Medial sural artery perforator free flap versus radial forearm free flap in oral cavity reconstruction and donor site morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: Radial Forearm Free flap (RFFF) is widely used in head and neck reconstruction, yet its donor site defect remains a significant drawback. The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap (MSAPFF) is considered an alternative flap to RFFF. This study aims to comprehensively analyze their characteristics, outcomes, and their impact on patient quality of life. METHODS: All patients who underwent oral cavity reconstruction using RFFF and MSAPFF between February 2017 and April 2023 were included in this study. Flap characteristics, outcomes and post-operative complications were recorded and compared. Subjective donor site morbidity, aesthetic and functional results, and quality of life were also analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 76 patients: 37 underwent reconstruction with RFFF, and 39 with MSAPFF. There was no significance difference between the RFFF and MSAPFF regarding the success rate (97.2% vs 97.4%), flap size (4.8 × 8.8 cm2 vs 5 × 9.8 cm2), hospital of stay (15.5 days vs 13.5 days) and recipient site complications (P > 0.05). However, MSAPFF showed larger flap thickness (P = 0.001), smaller arterial caliber (P = 0.008), shorter pedicle length (P = 0.001), and longer harvesting time (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the pre-and postoperative ranges of wrist and ankle movements or in recipient site complications. MSAPFF showed a significant difference in donor site morbidity (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The MSAPFF is an excellent alternative to the RFFF for repairing oral cavity defects, with additional advantage of a well-hidden scar on the posterior calf, a larger flap thickness, accepted pedicle length and arterial caliber. However, one should consider the harvesting time and surgical skills required in comparison to the RFFF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study highlights the importance of the MSAPFF as an alternative option for RFFF with less donor site morbidity and high success rate in oral cavity reconstruction and improved patient Quality of life after ablative surgery.

Comparative analysis of volumetric changes between resection volume of oral tongue cancer and post operative volume of radial forearm flaps.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the relationship between the total volume of oral tongue cancer pre-operatively and the RFFF volume post-operatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 DICOM imaging datasets (CT or MRI) of 26 patients were included in this study. The volume of the desired structure was quantified using semi-automatic segmentation using the software ITK-SNAP. All extracted measurements were validated by two further clinicians at separate instances. RESULTS: The variation of MeanVolTu can be predicted by MeanVolFlap moderately reliable with 59.1% confidence (R-Qua: 0.591). ANOVA Testing to represent how well the regression line fits the data, resulted in the overall regression model being statistically significant in predicting the MeanVolTu (p < 0.001). The flap volume may be predicted using the following algorithm: MeanVolFlap0 = 3241,633 + 1, 322 * MeanVolTu. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show positive correlation between tumor volume and flap volume, highlighting the significance of efficient flap planning with increasing tumor volume. A larger extraction volume of the radial forearm free flap from the donor site compromises the forearm more, thus increasing the probability of post-operative complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radial forearm free flap design in accordance with its corresponding 3D tumor volume.

Early Penile and Donor Site Sensory Outcomes After Innervated Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty: A Pilot Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Radial forearm free flap phalloplasty (RFFF) is a set of complex reconstructive procedures aimed at creating an aesthetic and functional penis in transgender patients. Sensory recovery in the neophallus and donor site is crucial for optimizing outcomes, but the few prior studies that exist assess neophallus sensation at limited locations and time points. The purpose of this study was to prospectively quantify sensory outcomes in the neophallus and donor site following RFFF phalloplasty. METHODS: Sensation testing occurred prospectively over February 2019-January 2021 on Stage 1 RFFF phalloplasty patients using the Pressure Specified Sensory Device (PSSD). On the neophallus, one-point discrimination (1PS) pressure threshold and lengthwise sensory recovery were measured at six circumferential locations proximally to distally. On the donor site, 1PS was measured at three locations on the donor hand. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included (average age 34.0 years old, range 18-53 years). Among patients that received neophallus testing (n = 13), eight had at least two follow-up appointments. Six of these patients had sensation as of their most recent measurement (75.0%), with an average of 73 days to regain sensation. There was a significantly greater proportion of patients with sensation at the right ventral (80.0% after 3 months vs. 11.1%-60.0% before 3 months, p = 0.024) and right lateral (100.0% after 3 months vs. 11.1%-60.0% before 3 months, p = 0.004) aspects of the neophallus over time. Pressure required to elicit sensation decreased by 18.0% from 1 week-1 month postoperatively to 3-7.7 months postoperatively in the right ventral neophallus (96.2 g/mm2 ± 11.3 g/mm2 to 56.6 ± 39.9 g/mm2, p = 0.037). Among patients that received donor site testing (n = 11), mixed effects regression analysis with random intercepts demonstrated significant changes in the thumb (3.4 g/mm2 ± 1.4 g/mm2, p < 0.05) and webspace (13.5 g/mm2 ± 4.9 g/mm2, p < 0.01) that returned to baseline at 3 months postoperatively (1.7 g/mm2 ± 1.0 g/mm2, p > 0.05, and 2.3 g/mm2 ± 4.0 g/mm2, p > 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrates that quantitative sensory testing can be used to monitor post-phalloplasty sensory changes. Recovery was significantly associated with contralateral (i.e, right side in a left forearm RFF) aspects of the neophallus, suggesting a possible pattern of circumferential sensory innervation via RFFF sensory nerves. Future studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-ups are necessary to fully characterize sensory recovery in phalloplasty patients.

An update on gender-affirming phallus construction using the radial forearm free-flap.

AIMS: The history of phallus construction parallels the advances made in plastic and reconstructive surgery whereby the era of microsurgery revolutionized numerous techniques. In 1993, we reported our early experience in phalloplasty. While the originally presented technique was a modification of the original design reported by Chang and Hwang, we now present further modifications of the past 30 years. METHODS: Through critical review of our technical modifications, as well as others', we present a comprehensive review of elements of the radial forearm free flap phallus construction. RESULTS: A radial forearm free flap is harvested and tubed to form the following components: urethra, shaft, and glans of the neophallus. When excess adipose tissue exists, the excess thickness is accommodated by increasing the proximal width of the flap. To optimize the venous drainage, the radial and ulnar superficial veins as well as the radial deep veins are included within the flap; however, venous flow is optimized through creation of an arteriovenous fistula within neo-glans. To lengthen the native urethra, labia minora and vaginal mucosal flaps are employed at a preliminary stage during vaginectomy. New coronoplasty modifications offer esthetic refinements. Updates in scrotal reconstruction and implantation of erectile devices complete the total genitourinary reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Phallus construction has evolved significantly over time. While numerous techniques exist, no standard of care has been identified. Continue surgical evolution will provide modern solutions for problems most often encountered to improve overall outcomes for transgender and gender-diverse patients pursuing masculinizing genitourinary reconstruction.

Comparing donor site morbidity in osteocutaneous radial forearm versus fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap has gained popularity as a less morbid option for oromandibular reconstruction compared to the fibular free flap. However, there is a paucity of data regarding direct outcome comparison between these techniques. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 94 patients who underwent maxillomandibular reconstruction intervened from July 2012-October 2020 at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. All other bony free flaps were excluded. Endpoints retrieved encompassed demographics, surgical outcomes, perioperative data, and donor site morbidity. Continuous data points were analyzed using independent sample t-Tests. Qualitative data was analyzed using Chi-Square tests to determine significance. Ordinal variables were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The cohort was equally male and female, with a mean age of 62.6 years. There were 21 and 73 patients in the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap and fibular free flap cohorts, respectively. Excluding age, the groups were otherwise comparable, including tobacco use, and ASA classification. Bony defect (OC-RFFF = 7.9 cm, FFF = 9.4 cm, p = 0.021) and skin paddle (OC-RFFF = 54.6 cm2, FFF = 72.21 cm2, p = 0.045) size were larger in the fibular free flap group. However, no significant difference was found between cohorts with respect to skin graft. There was no statistically significant difference between cohorts regarding the rate of donor site infection, tourniquet time, ischemia time, total operative time, blood transfusion, or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in perioperative donor site morbidity was found between patients undergoing fibular forearm free flap and osteocutaneous radial forearm flap for maxillomandibular reconstruction. Osteocutaneous radial forearm flap performance was associated with significantly older age, which may represent a selection bias.

Negative-pressure wound therapy for donor-site closure in radial forearm free flap: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is often used for skin graft site dressing, and several studies have reported that its use improves skin graft failure in the forearm flap donor site. The present systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT with skin graft for donor-site closure in radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction. A systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. The search terms used for PubMed were ([radial forearm]) AND ([donor]) AND ([negative pressure or vacuum]). This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews and performed in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement. Three prospective randomised controlled trials and three retrospective comparative studies were included. Compared with conventional bolster dressing, the use of NPWT dressing did not lead to significant improvements in partial skin graft loss, tendon exposure, and other complications. NPWT improved hand functionality earlier; nonetheless, the cost of the device and dressings was a disadvantage. The use of NPWT for skin graft fixation in the RFFF donor site is not generally recommended.

Donor site sequelae and patient satisfaction after head and neck reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap.

PURPOSE: Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) being a workhorse flap in head and neck reconstruction, we investigated its donor site delayed consequences. METHODS: Multicentric case series evaluating 189 patients who underwent RFFF for carcinologic reasons at least 6 months before. Patients and surgeon's appreciation regarding the aesthetic and functional consequences of the flap harvest on their daily life were evaluated by questionnaires using likert scales. Medical data were collected from patients' charts retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients had at least one sequelae. Experiencing a graft necrosis did not worsen long-term results. Cosmetic satisfaction was significantly worst for women, according to patients' and surgeons' opinion. For 81% and 92% patients, respectively, the flap harvest had no impact on daily life nor sport practice. Ratio between the benefits of reconstruction and the sequelae at the donor site was judged "excellent" for 77% patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although objectively important, RFFF morbidity has little impact in head and neck cancer patient's life.

[Use of radial forearm free flap for the reconstruction of hard and soft palate]. / Ispol'zovanie kozhno-fastsial'nogo luchevogo loskuta dlya rekonstruktsii defektov tverdogo i myagkogo neba.

OBJECTIVE: Improvement functional and aesthetic results of treatment patients with defects of the hard and soft palate after resections for malignant tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period from 2014 to 2020, 30 patients underwent microsurgical reconstruction of hard and soft palate defects using a radial forearm free flap. For the primary tumor process, surgery was performed in 21 patients (70%), for relapse after chemotherapy, combined or complex treatment - in 9 patients (30%). The majority of patients at the time of surgery had a locally advanced process of the T2 category (12 patients - 40%), T3 (2 patients - 7%) and T4 - 2 patients (7%). Localized stage T1 process was diagnosed in 5 patients (17%). RESULTS: Total flap necrosis was noted in 3 cases (10%) due to venous thrombosis on the 2nd and 3rd days after surgery and arterial thrombosis on the 2nd day. In one observation, on the 2nd day after surgery, a tense hematoma was diagnosed in the zone of formation of microanastomoses without signs of impaired flap perfusion, which required an emergency surgical intervention. All patients returned to their normal meals. No rhinolalia was observed in any of the cases. In one case, a patient with a defect in the anterior part of the hard palate obtained an unsatisfactory aesthetic result deformity of the midface; in all other cases, an excellent aesthetic result was obtained. CONCLUSION: For defects of the hard palate of posterior localization and minimal or no defect of the alveolar edge of the maxilla (class I, a, b according to Braun, class Ia, Ib according to Okay, class V according to Armany), as well as for the defects of the soft palate, the method of choice is radial forearm free flap. The size of the skin area of the flap can reach 6X8 cm, which makes it possible to replace the combined defects of the hard and soft palate, the lateral wall of the oropharynx, and the retromolar region. The plasticity of the flap makes it possible to reconstruct the total defects of the soft palate by forming it in the form of a duplication.

Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes: A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon submental flap (SMF) practice patterns and to evaluate variables associated with SMF complications. METHODS: The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between 11/11/16 and 12/31/16. Surgeon demographics, training, practice patterns and techniques were characterized and evaluated for associations with frequency of SMF complications. RESULTS: Among 212 AHNS surgeons, 108 (50.9%) reported performing SMFs, of whom 86 provided complete responses. Most surgeons who performed the SMF routinely reconstructed oral cavity defects with the flap (86.1%, n = 74). Thirty-seven surgeons (43.0%) experienced "very few" complications with the SMF. Surgeons who practiced in the United States versus internationally (p = 0.003), performed more total career SMFs (p = 0.02), and routinely reconstructed parotid and oropharyngeal defects (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001) with SMFs were more frequently perceived to have "very few" complications. SMF surgeons reported more perceived complications with the SMF compared to pectoralis major (p = 0.001) and radial forearm free flaps (p = 0.01). However, similar perceived complications were reported between all three flaps when surgeons performed >30 SMF. Among 94 surgeons not performing SMFs, 71.3% had interest in a SMF training course. CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns of surgeons performing SMFs are diverse, although most use the flap for oral cavity reconstruction. While 43% of surgeons performing the SMF reported "very few" complications, overall complication rates with the SMF were higher compared to other flaps, potentially due to limited experience with the SMF. Increased training opportunities in SMF harvest and inset are indicated.

Predictive factors for prolonged operative time in head and neck patients undergoing free flap reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Defining the predictive factors associated with prolonged operative time may reduce post-operative complications, improve patient outcomes, and decrease cost of care. The aims of this study are to 1) analyze risk factors associated with prolonged operative time in head and neck free flap patients and 2) determine the impact of lengthier operative time on surgical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 282 head and neck free flap reconstruction patients between 2011 and 2013 at a tertiary care center. Perioperative factors investigated by multivariate analyses included gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, tumor subsite, stage, flap type, preoperative comorbidities, and perioperative hematocrit nadir. Association was explored between operative times and complications including flap take back, flap survival, transfusion requirement, flap site hematoma, and surgical site infection. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 418.2 ± 88.4 (185-670) minutes. Multivariate analyses identified that ASA class III (beta coefficient + 24.5, p = .043), stage IV tumors (+34.8, p = .013), fibular free flaps (-44.8, p = .033 for RFFF vs. FFF and - 67.7, p = .023 for ALT vs FFF) and COPD (+36.0, p = .041) were associated with prolonged operative time. History of CAD (-43.5, p = .010) was associated with shorter operative time. There was no statistically significant association between longer operative time and adverse flap outcomes or complications. CONCLUSION: As expected, patients who were medically complex, had advanced cancer, or underwent complex flap reconstruction had longer operative times. Surgical planning should pay special attention to certain co-morbidities such as COPD, and explore innovative ways to minimize operative time. Future research is needed to evaluate how these factors can help guide planning algorithms for head and neck patients.

Use of amniotic membrane for radial forearm free flap donor site coverage: clinical, functional and cosmetic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, functional and aesthetic outcomes for radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor sites covered with amniotic membrane (AM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The healing process of patients with RFFF donor sites covered with AM was prospectively followed for 1 year. Additionally at the 12-month evaluation, objective scoring systems were used to assess the aesthetic (Vancouver scar scale, VSS: range 1-13) and functional outcome (skin sensibility, hand/wrist functionality [goniometer], grip strength [score 1 = excellent, 5 = poor]). By using a subjective rating system (score 1 = excellent, 5 = poor), the patient-reported aesthetic and functionality outcome was correlated with objective data analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one out of 23 patients were followed for 12 months (dropout: 2 patients at 3 months). In 17/23 (73.9%) patients RFFF defect covered with AM showed an uneventful healing period (< 3 months). Prolonged healing periods (> 3 months < 6) for 6 patients (26.1%) were attributed to wound infections (4×), seroma (1×) and inflammation (1×). At the 1-year evaluation, there was a significant (p < 0.01) correlation between subjective (2.0 ± 0.71) and objective aesthetic scores (VVS 3.74 ± 2.18), and a successful grip strength (score 1.67 ± 0.86); however, thumb hyposensibility in 76.2% was seen. A high body mass index (BMI) was in conjunction with a negative (p = 0.012) and the use of antihypertensive medications provided positive effects (p = 0.041) on the aesthetic outcome. CONCLUSION: RFFF donor site defects covered using AM show excellent clinical, aesthetic and functional outcome representing patient comorbidities (BMI, antihypertensive drugs) might affect the aesthetic outcome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In relation to the excellent outcomes found, the use of AM offers an alternative treatment procedure for RFFF defect covering.

A novel radial forearm free flap design to treat pharyngoesophageal stenosis in combination with the posterior wall of the trachea.

Pharyngoesophageal stenosis (PES) is a common and serious complication of head and neck cancer treatments such as radiation therapy, chemotherapy, tracheoesophageal puncture placement, and total laryngectomy surgery. Dilation-resistant stenosis requires surgical reconstruction, often with a radial forearm free flap (RFFF). With the present technique, the authors refine their previous bipaddled free flap design used to reconstruct a persistent tracheoesophageal fistulae (TEF) in combination with PES. Accordingly, we present a novel bipaddled triangular RFFF design ideally suited to address the shape of the defect in the posterior tracheal wall that results when the TEF is opened and the esophageal and tracheal components are restored.

Anatomical Variations of the Superficial Radial Nerve Encountered during Radial Forearm Free Flap Elevation.

A frequently encountered anatomical structure in the elevation of a radial forearm free flap is the superficial branch of the radial nerve. This structure has a relatively consistent anatomic location, but variations do occur. We present a case where the superficial branch of the radial nerve was in an usual position but remained superficial to the brachioradialis throughout its course. Two previous reports also describe the superficial branch of the radial nerve remaining superficial to the brachioradialis, although, in these reports, the nerve was more medial than is typical. We postulate that one of the most common anatomic variations of the superficial branch of the radial nerve is for it to remain superficial to the brachioradialis. As this variation could potentially be confused with the medial or lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerves, it is important for the reconstructive surgeon to be aware of this to prevent inadvertent injury.

Comparative Analysis of Radial Forearm Free Flap and Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Tongue Reconstruction after Radical Resection of Tongue Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is still the preferred treatment for tongue cancer. Reconstruction should be performed immediately after extensive resection of the tumor. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effect, advantages, and disadvantages of radial forearm free (RFF) flap and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in tongue reconstruction after radical resection of tongue cancer. METHODS: Thirty-nine cases of tongue reconstruction with RFF flap or ALT flap from 2014 to 2018 were analyzed. The survival of the flap, the functional status after repair, and the influence on the donor area were examined, in addition to the advantages and disadvantages of the flap and the critical points of the technique. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases with RFF flaps and 18 cases with ALT flaps showed complete flap survival. Among them, 1 case involved a venous vessel crisis after an ALT operation, and the flap survived after reoperation after thrombus removal and anastomosis. The recovery of tongue function was as follows: 41.0% patients exhibited normal speech, 43.6% patients exhibited near-normal speech, 12.8% patients exhibited vague speech, and 2.6% patients could not speak. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.134). The recovery of tongue flexibility was as follows: 41.0% of the patients had normal postoperative tongue flexibility, 43.6% of the patients had slightly limited tongue flexibility, 12.8% of the patients had severely limited tongue flexibility, and 2.6% of the patients were completely limited. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (p = 0.045). The postoperative diet of patients was as follows: 51.3% of patients had a regular diet, 33.3% of patients had soft foods, 12.8% of patients received a fluid diet, and 2.6% of patients could not eat after the operation. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.209). The satisfaction of donor area was as follows: 46.2% of the patients were satisfied with the donor area, 51.3% of the patients were basically satisfied with the donor area satisfaction, and 2.6% of the patients were not satisfied with the donor area satisfaction. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.809). CONCLUSION: The RFF flap is the most widely used technique in tongue reconstruction, especially in patients with tongue defects less than half of tongue tissue. However, for a large number of tissue defects caused by radical resection of advanced tongue cancer, the ALT flaps can provide a sufficient tissue volume, conceal scars after the operation, cause fewer complications in the donor area, and facilitate tongue function and aesthetic quality.

Radial forearm free flap: A dynamic flap for single-staged multiple subunit reconstruction.

We report the case of a middle aged patient with biopsy proven squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa who presented to us in Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi in April, 2017 and required reconstruction of buccal mucosa, upper lip and lower lip. As per protocol of our institute the lesion was excised by the head and neck surgeon and the defect was reconstructed by our team. The defect was large comprising of buccal mucosa including the left oral commissure, upper lip and the lower lip. It was reconstructed via a free flap and a radial forearm free flap. A specially designed radial forearm free flap was harvested and used for reconstruction which resulted in a good aesthetic and functional outcome.

Reconstruction of a subtotal upper lip defect with a facial artery musculomucosal flap, kite flap, and radial forearm free flap: a case report.

BACKGROUND: For reconstructive surgeons, massive midface defects, including large, full-thickness wounds on the upper lip, can be very challenging. Although there are many methods for reconstruction of upper lip defects, it is difficult to obtain satisfactory restoration of oral functions and good cosmetic results. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report presents a man with massive midface defects, including upper lip, left nose, and cheek defects. Over the previous 2 years, the patient had three reconstructions with sequential free flaps for the resection of recurrent tumors, the first of which was in March of 2016; this resulted in the patient having massive midface defects, including an upper lip defect, a defect on the left side of the nose, and one on the left cheek. The defects were reconstructed using a radial forearm free flap (RFFF), a facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap, and a kite flap. In June 2016, he underwent a second reconstruction, this time of the left nose defect, using a left anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. In March of 2017, the patient underwent a third reconstruction with the use of a free ALT on the left intraoral cheek and the defects on the neck. All flaps survived. No complications were encountered postoperatively. The patient regained good oral sphincter function with no reports of drooling. Although the patient underwent three surgeries, the reconstruction results were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: For massive midface defects, including large, full-thickness wounds on the upper lip, the combination of a FAMM flap, kite flap, and RFFF promotes the reconstruction of the complex midface structure and improves the resulting functionality.

Functional and cosmetic donor site morbidity of the radial forearm-free flap: comparison of two different coverage techniques.

BACKGROUND: The use of the radial forearm-free flap is a well-established and reliable reconstruction method in head and neck surgery. Usually, the defect of the donor site is covered with full or split-thickness skin grafts. Since 09/2013, a direct closure of the radial forearm donor site has been performed at the ENT University Hospital Leipzig to avoid secondary donor site morbidity. However, few data are available in the literature on long-term cosmetic and functional results compared to the established indirect donor site defect coverage. METHODS: This study investigated patients with radial forearm-free flap harvest from 01/2012 until 03/2015. A total of n = 39 patients were included, with n = 18 being operated by indirect (group 1) and n = 21 by direct closure technique (group 2). For the validation of surgical revisions and wound healing disorders, we carried out clinical investigations as well as interviews. The "POSAS Observer and Patient Scale" was used for assessing the cosmetic outcome and the "Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ)" for functional criteria. RESULTS: Group 2 showed an increased rate of wound healing problems, however it was not statistically different compared to group 1. Revision surgery was necessary in both groups only each in one case. Using the POSAS, there were no significant differences between both groups in the observer scale for the items vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and even for pain, scar itching, color, stiffness, thickness and relief in the patient scale. The functional results (MHOQ) also showed no significantly inferior results for group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The direct closure procedure is quick, simple and can be performed without secondary donor site morbidity. For wound healing, cosmetic and function of the forearm and hand, no inferior results can be measured for the direct procedure compared to the indirect coverage technique.

Extended adipofascial wrap around radial forearm flap for hard palate reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: While using radial forearm free flap in palate reconstruction, the pedicle lies in the nasal floor, constantly exposed to the nasal secretions and turbulent air current. To overcome this problem, we have designed a procedure which utilises the adipofascial extension to wrap the pedicle and nasal side of the flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was done during 2017 and 2018, 2 years' period. Totally 13 consecutive patients with defect in the palate status post-oncological resection and those in whom local flaps were not enough to cover the defect were included into the study. These patients were divided into two groups. First group in whom adipofascial extension was not used to cover the pedicle and second group in whom adipofascial extension was used to cover the pedicle. The incidence of nasal crusting, secondary haemorrage, blow out and flap necrosis were analysed and compared. RESULTS: In Group 1, we had 2 among 6 (33%) patients with secondary haemorrage. One patient had partial flap loss. On exploring, we noticed thrombosis of cephalic vein. We did not had any incidence of blow out of the pedicle. In Group 2, none of the patients had any secondary haemorrage. All flaps healed well. On doing nasal endoscopy at 6 months of follow-up, all flaps showed complete mucosalisation at the nasal side. CONCLUSION: Use of adipofascial extension while planning a radial forearm free flap to cover the nasal side of the flap and pedicle in the nasal floor helps to reduce the nasal crusting and secondary haemorrhage.

MatriDerm Decreases Donor Site Morbidity After Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest in Transgender Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Phalloplasty with the radial forearm free flap is associated with a large donor site defect. AIM: To compare two methods of donor site closure for functional and cosmetic long-term results: full-thickness skin grafting vs split-thickness skin grafting with MatriDerm. METHODS: Thirty-seven transgender patients had a neophallus created from a radial forearm free flap, and all were operated on by the same senior surgeon. Eight patients had their donor site defect closed by total skin grafting and 29 patients, operated on after 2009, received a split-thickness skin graft with MatriDerm closure. All 37 patients were evaluated by questionnaire and by careful clinical examination. Pressure perception was assessed with the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test. Sensory recovery, skin quality, and cosmetic result also were compared. The contralateral arm was used as the control. OUTCOMES: Pressure perception values showed better sensory return in the MatriDerm group. Split-thickness skin grafting with MatriDerm achieved superior results in skin sensibility, superficial radial nerve recovery, and cosmetic aspect. RESULTS: Our findings support the hypothesis that MatriDerm can be used to preserve sensory function and decrease morbidity of the donor site. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The use of a dermal substitute decreases the morbidity of the forearm free flap donor site. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The strength of this study is its retrospective nature conducted of a prospectively maintained database of 37 consecutive radial forearm free flaps with superimposable dimensions and location performed by the same surgeon, thus limiting biases. A limitation is its small sample (particularly for the control group). CONCLUSION: Our experience showed that the combination of a split-thickness skin graft with MatriDerm substantially decreases postoperative complications at the donor site defect on the forearm of transgender patients. Watfa W, di Summa PG, Meuli J, et al. MatriDerm Decreases Donor Site Morbidity After Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest in Transgender Surgery. J Sex Med 2017;14:1277-1284.

[An original "double-arched" radial forearm flap for soft palate reconstruction. Case report]. / Conformation du lambeau antébrachial en arche sur mesure pour la reconstruction du voile du palais. Cas clinique.

INTRODUCTION: Reconstruction of the soft palate after oncologic resection remains a surgical challenge. Speech and swallowing problems are the consequences of velopharyngeal incompetence following soft palate resection. Free tissue transfer like radial forearm flaps can be used in larger defects for complex reconstruction. The conformation of the flap in order to be closer to the shape of the soft palate improves the functional outcome. In the same way, we describe an original "double-arched" flap design. METHODS: A double arch of the exact length of the soft palate tumor resection is designed. After suturing, the flap spontaneously formed a double arch of the exact dimensions of the resected piece. RESULTS: The patient achieved good functional recovery without any surgical complications. CONCLUSION: The original "double-arched" forearm flap design allows a tailored reconstruction with exactly the same shape and dimensions, preserving the functional requirements of speech and deglutition.