Umbrella review and network meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging test accuracy studies in Differentiating between brain tumor progression versus pseudoprogression and radionecrosis.

PURPOSE: In this study we gathered and analyzed the available evidence regarding 17 different imaging modalities and performed network meta-analysis to find the most effective modality for the differentiation between brain tumor recurrence and post-treatment radiation effects. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive systematic search on PubMed and Embase. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) instrument. For each meta-analysis, we recalculated the effect size, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio from the individual study data provided in the original meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Imaging technique comparisons were then assessed using NMA. Ranking was assessed using the multidimensional scaling approach and by visually assessing surface under the cumulative ranking curves. RESULTS: We identified 32 eligible studies. High confidence in the results was found in only one of them, with a substantial heterogeneity and small study effect in 21% and 9% of included meta-analysis respectively. Comparisons between MRS Cho/NAA, Cho/Cr, DWI, and DSC were most studied. Our analysis showed MRS (Cho/NAA) and 18F-DOPA PET displayed the highest sensitivity and negative likelihood ratios. 18-FET PET was ranked highest among the 17 studied techniques with statistical significance. APT MRI was the only non-nuclear imaging modality to rank higher than DSC, with statistical insignificance, however. CONCLUSION: The evidence regarding which imaging modality is best for the differentiation between radiation necrosis and post-treatment radiation effects is still inconclusive. Using NMA, our analysis ranked FET PET to be the best for such a task based on the available evidence. APT MRI showed promising results as a non-nuclear alternative.

SAFESTEREO: phase II randomized trial to compare stereotactic radiosurgery with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a frequently chosen treatment for patients with brain metastases and the number of long-term survivors is increasing. Brain necrosis (e.g. radionecrosis) is the most important long-term side effect of the treatment. Retrospective studies show a lower risk of radionecrosis and local tumor recurrence after fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS, e.g. five fractions) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery in one or three fractions. This is especially true for patients with large brain metastases. As such, the 2022 ASTRO guideline of radiotherapy for brain metastases recommends more research to fSRS to reduce the risk of radionecrosis. This multicenter prospective randomized study aims to determine whether the incidence of adverse local events (either local failure or radionecrosis) can be reduced using fSRS versus SRS in one or three fractions in patients with brain metastases. METHODS: Patients are eligible with one or more brain metastases from a solid primary tumor, age of 18 years or older, and a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70. Exclusion criteria include patients with small cell lung cancer, germinoma or lymphoma, leptomeningeal metastases, a contraindication for MRI, prior inclusion in this study, prior surgery for brain metastases, prior radiotherapy for the same brain metastases (in-field re-irradiation). Participants will be randomized between SRS with a dose of 15-24 Gy in 1 or 3 fractions (standard arm) or fSRS 35 Gy in five fractions (experimental arm). The primary endpoint is the incidence of a local adverse event (local tumor failure or radionecrosis identified on MRI scans) at two years after treatment. Secondary endpoints are salvage treatment and the use of corticosteroids, bevacizumab, or antiepileptic drugs, survival, distant brain recurrences, toxicity, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Currently, limiting the risk of adverse events such as radionecrosis is a major challenge in the treatment of brain metastases. fSRS potentially reduces this risk of radionecrosis and local tumor failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov, trial registration number: NCT05346367 , trial registration date: 26 April 2022.

Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis comparing imaging modalities.

PURPSOSE: Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN) is often a delayed phenomenon occurring several months to years after the completion of radiation treatment. Differentiating RN from tumor recurrence presents a diagnostic challenge on standard MRI. To date, no evidence-based guidelines exist regarding imaging modalities best suited for this purpose. We aim to review the current literature and perform a diagnostic meta-analysis comparing various imaging modalities that have been studied to differentiate tumor recurrence and RN. METHODS: A systematic search adherent to PRISMA guidelines was performed using Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were determined using a random-effects or fixed-effects proportional meta-analysis based on heterogeneity. Using diagnostic odds ratios, a diagnostic frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed, and studies were ranked using P-score hierarchical ranking. RESULTS: The analysis included 127 studies with a total of 220 imaging datasets, including the following imaging modalities: MRI (n = 10), MR Spectroscopy (MRS) (n = 28), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (n = 7), dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (n = 36), MR arterial spin labeling (n = 5), diffusion-weighted imaging (n = 13), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (n = 2), PET (n = 89), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (n = 30). MRS had the highest pooled sensitivity (90.7%). DTI had the highest pooled specificity (90.5%). Our hierarchical ranking ranked SPECT and MRS as most preferable, and MRI was ranked as least preferable. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest SPECT and MRS carry greater utility than standard MRI in distinguishing RN from tumor recurrence.

Bevacizumab for Cerebral Radionecrosis: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral radionecrosis, a subacute or late effect of radiotherapy, can be debilitating and difficult to treat. Steroids can reduce symptoms, but have significant long-term side effects. Bevacizumab has been shown to reduce edema and other radiologic features associated with radionecrosis and improve patient symptoms. We report our experience using bevacizumab for cerebral radionecrosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients treated at our institution with bevacizumab for non-glioma-associated cerebral radionecrosis. We recorded change in symptoms, change in steroids, change in performance status, time to tumor progression, and time to death. We delineated the volume of necrosis pre- and post-bevacizumab on T1-post-gadolinium and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI scans. RESULTS: We identified 15 patients, 8 with brain metastases, 6 with meningioma, and 1 with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Most received four doses of bevacizumab, 7.5 mg/kg q 3 weeks × 4 doses. Neuroimaging demonstrated a reduced T1 gadolinium-enhancing volume and edema in 14/15 patients (the average reduction in T1-post-gadolinium volume was 3.0 cm3, and average reduction in FLAIR volume was 27.9 cm3). There was no appreciable change in patient performance status. Steroid doses decreased in five of nine patients. There was a high rate (26%) of adverse events, including pulmonary embolism, stroke, and wound dehiscence. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 months. CONCLUSION: Although bevacizumab is commonly prescribed for cerebral radionecrosis, in our retrospective cohort, the clinical benefits were modest and there was significant toxicity.

Radionecrosis (RN) in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist regarding radionecrosis (RN) rates when patients receive immunotherapy (IT) and SRS for brain metastases. This study assesses the influence of such treatments on the rate of RN. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 352 lesions from 105 patients with metastatic melanoma or NSCLC treated with SRS and IT from 2012 to 2018. Lesions were excluded from analysis if patients had received WBRT or prior GK to the same lesion, if RN occurred before IT, or if IT had been discontinued >6 months pre-SRS or initiated >1 year post-SRS. IT was delivered concurrently (±30 days of SRS) or sequentially. Overall survival and RN rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to identify characteristics predicting RN. RESULTS: Of 195 lesions from 63 patients included in analysis, the median prescription dose, IDL, lesion volume, and maximum tumor dimension (MTD) were 19 Gy, 50%, 0.15 cc and 0.8 cm, respectively. RN rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 7.3%, 10.4% and 10.4%. On UVA, RN risk increased with, isodose volume (IDV), MTD, and tumor volume (TV) whereas conformity index was associated with a trend toward decreased RN risk. Two-year RN rates increased with TV ≥ 0.3 cc (16% vs 1.1% p = 0.001), MTD ≥ 1.3 cm (19.1% vs 1.8% p < 0.003), and IDV ≥ 1.5 cc (19.6% vs 1.7% p = 0.001). Concurrent vs sequential timing of IT did not predict for RN. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received IT and SRS had acceptably low rates of RN. Timing of IT did not predict for RN. Further investigation is warranted to define RN risk with combined SRS and IT.

Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors.

Research regarding the mechanisms of brain damage following radiation treatments for brain tumors has increased over the years, thus providing a deeper insight into the pathobiological mechanisms and suggesting new approaches to minimize this damage. This review has discussed the different factors that are known to influence the risk of damage to the brain (mainly cognitive disturbances) from radiation. These include patient and tumor characteristics, the use of whole-brain radiotherapy versus particle therapy (protons, carbon ions), and stereotactic radiotherapy in various modalities. Additionally, biological mechanisms behind neuroprotection have been elucidated.

Successful treatment of radiation-induced vaginal soft tissue radionecrosis with HBO2.

Introduction: Radiation therapy to the pelvis can result in radiation-induced vaginal soft tissue necrosis. This significantly impacts quality of life. Studies evaluating the efficacy of HBO2 are limited. Methods: In this retrospective report, we reviewed the medical records of patients treated with once-daily HBO2 for radiation-induced vaginal soft tissue necrosis. We included females between the ages of 18 to 90 with history of pelvic cancer treated with radiotherapy and resultant soft tissue radionecrosis. Data collected included age, comorbid disease, cancer type, radiation dose, HBO2 treatment pressure, time, and total treatments. Primary outcome was improvement of radionecrosis; secondary outcomes were improvement of pelvic pain, reduction in need for analgesia, and improvement of vaginal bleeding. Results: Seven patients were identified, of which six received HBO2. One patient had a vaginal fistula. Four patients had documented improvement of radionecrosis. Four out of five patients with pelvic pain had resolution of their pain, with two patients no longer requiring opioid analgesia. Two patients who presented with vaginal bleeding showed improvement with one resolved and one significantly decreased requiring no further hospitalization or transfusion. One patient experienced no documented improvement in any of the measured outcomes. Conclusion: In this case series, five out of six (83%) patients treated with HBO2 for radiation-induced vaginal necrosis improved in at least one outcome measure. While the sample size is small, these results add to the data available that supports the use of HBO2 in suitable candidates without contraindications who have symptoms related to radiation-induced vaginal soft tissue necrosis.

Advances in treatments of patients with classical and emergent neurological toxicities of anticancer agents.

The neurotoxicity associated to the anticancer treatments has received a growing body of interest in the recent years. The development of innovating therapies over the last 20years has led to the emergence of new toxicities. Their diagnosis and management can be challenging in the clinical practice and further research is warranted to improve the understanding of their pathogenic mechanisms. Conventional treatments as radiation therapy and chemotherapy are associated to well-known and under exploration emerging central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) toxicities. The identification of the risk factors and a better understanding of their pathogeny through a "bench to bedside and back again" approach, are the first steps towards the development of toxicity mitigation strategies. New imaging techniques and biological explorations are invaluable for their diagnosis. Immunotherapies have changed the cancer treatment paradigm from tumor cell centered to immune modulation towards an efficient anticancer immune response. The use of the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and CAR-T cells (chimeric antigen receptor) lead to an increase in the incidence of immune-mediated toxicities and new challenges in the neurological patient's management. The neurological ICI related adverse events (n-irAE) are rare but potentially severe and may present with both CNS and PNS involvement. The most frequent and well characterized, from a clinical and biological standpoint, are the PNS phenotypes: myositis and polyradiculoneuropathy, but the knowledge on CNS phenotypes and their treatments is expanding. The n-irAE management requires a good balance between dampening the autoimmune toxicity without impairing the anticancer immunity. The adoptive cell therapies as CAR-T cells, a promising anticancer strategy, trigger cellular activation and massive production of proinflammatory cytokines inducing frequent and sometime severe toxicity known as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome. Their management requires a close partnership between oncologist-hematologists, neurologists, and intensivists. The oncological patient's management requires a multidisciplinary clinical team (oncologist, neurologist and paramedical) as well as a research team leading towards a better understanding and a better management of the neurological toxicities.

Focal cavity radiotherapy after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases: sparing neurotoxicity without compromising locoregional control.

PURPOSE: Does focal cavity radiotherapy after resection of brain metastasis "spare" whole-brain radiotherapy, which is associated with toxicity for patients, through the complete course of their disease without compromising long-term local control of the brain? METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent adjuvant focal cavity radiotherapy between 2014 and 2021 at our center. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients with 86 resected brain metastases were analyzed. 64% had singular, 36% two to four brain metastases. In cases with multiple metastases, omitted lesions were treated with radiosurgery. Median follow-up was 7.3 months (range 0-71.2 months), 1­year overall survival rate was 57.8% (95% CI 44.9-68.8%). Radiotherapy was administered with a median biologically effective dose (α/ß 10) surrounding the planning target volume of 48 Gy (range 23.4-60 Gy). Estimated 1­year local control rate was 82.7% (95% CI 67.7-91.2%), estimated 1­year distant brain control rate was 55.7% (95% CI 40.5-68.4%), estimated 1­year leptomeningeal disease rate was 16.0% (95% CI 7.3-32.9%). Eleven distant brain recurrences could be salvaged with radiosurgery. In the further course of disease, 14 patients (17%) developed disseminated metastatic disease in the brain. Estimated 1­year free of whole-brain radiotherapy rate was 72.3% (95% CI 57.1-82.9%). All applied treatments led to an estimated 1­year neuro-control rate of 79.1% (95% CI 65.0-88.0%), estimated 1­year radionecrosis rate was 23% (95% CI 12.4-40.5%). CONCLUSION: In our single-center study, focal cavity radiotherapy was associated with high local control. In three out of four patients, whole-brain radiotherapy could be avoided in the complete course of disease, using radiosurgery as salvage approach without compromising neuro-control.

Trastuzumab emtansine increases the risk of stereotactic radiosurgery-induced radionecrosis in HER2 + breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we investigate factors associated with radionecrosis (RN) in HER2 + (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) patients with brain metastases (BrM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Patients with HER2 + breast cancer BrM treated with SRS (2010-2020) were identified from an institutional database. The incidence of RN was determined per treated BrM according to serial imaging and/or histology. Factors associated with RN such as age, RT dose, BrM volume, and initiation of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) were investigated with univariate and multivariable analyses (MVA). RESULTS: 67 HER2 + patients with 223 BrM were identified. 21 patients (31.3%) were treated with T-DM1 post-SRS, including 14 patients (20.9%) who received T-DM1 within 12 months of SRS. The median follow-up was 15.6 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.4-35.3) months. The overall probability of RN post-SRS was 21.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-10.7), and the 1 and 2 year risk was 6.7% (95% CI 2.7-10.7) and 15.2% (95% CI 9.2-21.3). MVA identified T-DM1 treatment post-SRS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.3, p = 0.02) and equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) > 90 Gy2 (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.1, p = 0.02) as predictors of RN. Patients treated with T-DM1 and SRS had a 29.9% (95% CI 15.3-44.6%) probability of RN, with a 25.2% (95% CI 12.8-37.6%) risk at 1- and 2 years post-T-DM1. The majority of RN were symptomatic (71%), with a median time to RN of 4.8 months. CONCLUSION: T-DM1 exposure post-SRS was associated with a higher risk of RN among patients with HER2 + BrM.

The incidence of brainstem toxicity following high-dose conformal proton therapy for adult skull-base malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Dose escalation for skull-based malignancies often presents risks to critical adjacent neural structures, including the brainstem. We report the incidence of brainstem toxicity following fractionated high-dose conformal proton therapy and associated dosimetric parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a single-institution review of patients with skull-base chordoma or chondrosarcoma who were treated with proton therapy between February 2007 and January 2020 on a prospective outcomes-tracking protocol. The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity. No patients received concurrent chemotherapy, and brainstem toxicity was censored for analysis if it coincided with local disease progression. RESULTS: We analyzed 163 patients who received a minimum of 45 GyRBE to 0.03 cm3 of the brainstem. Patients were treated to a median total dose of 73.8 (range 64.5-74.4) GyRBE at 1.8 GyRBE per fraction with 17 patients undergoing twice-daily treatment at 1.2 GyRBE per fraction. With a median follow-up of 4 years, the 5-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 brainstem injury was 1.3% (95% CI 0.25-4.3%). There was one grade 2, one grade 3, and no grade 4 or 5 events, with all patients recovering function with medical management. CONCLUSION: In delivering curative-intent radiotherapy for skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma in adults, small volumes of the brainstem can safely receive at least 64 GyRBE with minimal risk of serious brainstem injury.

Neurological side effects of radiation therapy.

Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the main treatments administered to patients with cancer. The development of technology has improved RT accuracy by allowing more precise delivery of high doses to the target volumes with reduced exposure of healthy tissue. Life expectancy has increased due to these therapeutic advancements and the patients' quality of life remains a major concern. The adverse events related to RT are quite various and most likely will impair essential neurological functions, e.g. cognitive status. This literature review aims to describe the physiopathological processes, the neurological symptoms as well as the local modifications observed in magnetic resonance imaging following RT. The specific therapeutic options and preventive actions will also be discussed.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain oligometastases.

Brain metastases, the most common metastases in adults, will develop in up to 40% of cancer patients, accounting for more than one-half of all intracranial tumors. They are most associated with breast and lung cancer, melanoma and, less frequently, colorectal and kidney carcinoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for diagnosis. For the treatment plan, computed tomography (CT ) images are co-registered and fused with a gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI where tumor volume and organs at risk are contoured. Alternatively, plain and contrast-enhanced CT scans are co-registered. Single-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) is used to treat patients with good performance status and up to 4 lesions with a diameter of 30 mm or less that are distant from crucial brain function areas. Fractionated SRT (2-5 fractions) is used for larger lesions, in eloquent areas or in proximity to crucial or surgically inaccessible areas and to reduce treatment-related neurotoxicity. The single-fraction SRT dose, which depends on tumor diameter, impacts local control. Fractionated SRT may encompass different schedules. No randomized trial data compared the safety and efficacy of single and multiple fractions. Both single-fraction and fractionated SRT provide satisfactory local control rates, tolerance, a low risk of transient acute adverse events and of radiation necrosis the incidence of which correlated with the irradiated brain volume.

Intraoperative radiotherapy with low-energy x-rays after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases-an Augsburg University Medical Center experience.

PURPOSE: External-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the predominant method for localized brain radiotherapy (LBRT) after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50-kV x­rays is an alternative way to focally irradiate the resection cavity after BM surgery, with the option of shortening the overall treatment time and limiting normal tissue irradiation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent neurosurgical resection of BM and 50-kV x­ray IORT between 2013 and 2020 at Augsburg University Medical Center. RESULTS: We identified 40 patients with 44 resected BM treated with 50-kV x­ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 2.8 cm (range 1.5-5.9 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including 3­monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14.4 months, with a median MRI FU for alive patients of 12.2 months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 26.4 months (estimated 1­year OS 61.6%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 88.6% (estimated 1­year LC 84.3%). Distant brain control (DC) was 47.5% (estimated 1­year DC 33.5%). Only 25% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radionecrosis rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSION: IORT with 50-kV x­rays is a safe and appealing way to apply LBRT after neurosurgical resection of BM, with low toxicity and excellent LC. Close MRI FU is paramount to detect distant brain failure (DBF) early.

Risk of radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastasis by anatomical location.

PURPOSE: In this retrospective study, we have explored the anatomical factors that lead to the development of radiation necrosis (RN) in the setting of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for melanoma brain metastases (MBM). METHODS: Between 2014 and 2018, 137 patients underwent SRS for 311 MBM. Lesions were assessed according to anatomical zones: zone 1-peripheral grey-white matter junction and cortical mantle, zone 2-deep white matter, including tumours located at base of sulci, zone 3-tumours adjacent to ependymal lining or in deep locations such as brainstem, basal ganglia and thalamus. Other anatomical factors including lobes, medial-peripheral, supra or infratentorial locations were also recorded. RESULTS: In all, 12.4% (n = 17) of patients and 6.1% (n = 20) of lesions developed RN, actuarial incidence of RN at 12 and 24 months was 10% and 14.2% respectively. Zone 2 lesions recorded the highest rate of development of RN (n = 7/19; 36%), zone 3 (N = 4/24; 16%) and zone 1 (n = 9/268; 3%). Five of 17 patients developed symptomatic RN and 7/17 patients underwent surgery for RN. CONCLUSION: This study raises awareness of the increased likelihood of deep lesions particularly in white matter structures to develop RN after SRS. Further studies including larger cohorts would be useful in identifying statistical differences in the rate of development of RN in different anatomical zones.

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: the STEP study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, phase-II trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is an important therapeutic option for brain metastases. Currently, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRT) leads to 6-month and 1-year local control estimated at 70 and 62% respectively. However, there is an increased risk of radio-necrosis and leptomeningeal relapse. Preoperative SRT might be an alternative, providing local control remains at least equivalent. It is an innovative concept that could enable the stereotactic benefits to be retained with advantages over post-operative SRT. METHODS: STEP has been designed as a national, multicentre, open-label, prospective, non-randomized, phase-II trial. Seventeen patients are expected to be recruited in the study from 7 sites and they will be followed for 12 months. Patients with more than 4 distinct brain metastases, including one with a surgical indication, and an indication for SRT and surgery, are eligible for enrolment. The primary objective of the trial is to assess 6-month local control after preoperative SRT. The secondary objectives include the assessment of local control, radio-necrosis, overall survival, toxicities, leptomeningeal relapse, distant control, cognitive function, and quality of life. The experimental design is based on a Flemming plan. DISCUSSION: There is very little data available in the literature on preoperative SRT: there have only been 3 American single or two-centre retrospective studies. STEP is the first prospective trial on preoperative SRT in Europe. Compared to postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy, preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy will enable reduction in the irradiated volume, leptomeningeal relapse and the total duration of the combined treatment (from 4 to 6 weeks to a few days). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04503772 , registered on August 07, 2020. Identifier with the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM): N°ID RCB 2020-A00403-36, registered in February 2020. PROTOCOL: version 4, 07 December 2020.

Peri-radiosurgical administration of bevacizumab improves radiographic response to single and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a standard of care for brain metastases (BM) patients, yet large BM are at a greater risk for radionecrosis and local progression (LP). Concomitant bevacizumab and radiotherapy has been shown to improve outcomes in primary and metastatic brain tumors. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of concurrent bevacizumab and SRS for large BM. METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, patients with a BM diameter ≥ 2 cm who received either combination therapy (n = 49, SRS + BVZ group), or SRS alone (n = 73, SRS group) were enrolled. Bevacizumab was given peri-radiosurgically with a 2-week interval. Radiographic response was assessed using the RECIST version 1.1. Competing risk and logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate prognostic factors. RESULTS: Radiographic response was achieved in 41 patients (84%) in the SRS + BVZ group and 37 patients (51%) in the SRS group (p = 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, concurrent bevacizumab was independently associated with a better radiographic response (p = 0.003). The cumulative incidences of LP and ≥ grade 2 radionecrosis at 12 months between the SRS + BVZ group and SRS group were 2% versus 6.8%, and 14.3% versus 14.6%, respectively. For patients with BM size ≥ 3 cm, the cumulative incidence of LP was significantly lower in the SRS + BVZ group (p = 0.03). No ≥ grade 4 toxicity was observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent bevacizumab and SRS for large BM is highly effective, with a better radiographic response and minimal excessive treatment-related toxicities. Peri-radiosurgical bevacizumab preferentially reduced the risk of LP, especially for BM size ≥ 3 cm.

Is the Risk to Develop Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaws Following IMRT for Head and Neck Cancer Related to Co-Factors?

Background and Objectives: Determine the contribution of coexisting factors to the risk to develop Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaws among patients who have received radiotherapy by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) between 2013 and 2016, in a single medical center. Materials and Methods: The records of all patients treated with IMRT for HNC between 2013 and 2016 in The Davidoff Center for the treatment and Research of Cancer in Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel were screened. Patients who have received a minimum mean dose of 40 Gy to the oral cavity entered the research and their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Collected background data included: age, gender, smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM), ASA score, mean and maximal radiation doses (Gy), and diseases characteristics including histological diagnosis, primary tumor site, and disease stage. Results: A total of 1232 patients were surveyed. Out of all screened patients, 93 received a minimum mean dose of 40 Gy to the oral cavity. Out of the 93 patients, 7 (7.52%) developed ORN (ORN+) and 86 did not develop ORN (ORN-). Tumor type in all seven patients in the ORN+ group was Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC). In three out of those seven patients (42.9%), the tumor was located in the mandible. Conclusions: within the limits of the relatively small cohort in the current study, we suggest that the development of ORN due to Radiation therapy (RT) with IMRT is related significantly only to the location of a tumor in the mandible. Other co-factors do not significantly increase the risk to develop ORN when RT is delivered via IMRT.

Current multidisciplinary management of brain metastases.

Brain metastasis (BM), the most common adult brain tumor, develops in 20% to 40% of patients with late-stage cancer and traditionally are associated with a poor prognosis. The management of patients with BM has become increasingly complex because of new and emerging systemic therapies and advancements in radiation oncology and neurosurgery. Current therapies include stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiation therapy, surgical resection, laser-interstitial thermal therapy, systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Determining the optimal treatment for a specific patient has become increasingly individualized, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary discussions of patients with BM. Recognizing and addressing the sequelae of BMs and their treatment while maintaining quality of life and neurocognition is especially important because survival for patients with BMs has improved. The authors present current and emerging treatment options for patients with BM and suggest approaches for managing sequelae and disease recurrence.

Radiation ulcer treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy and haemoglobin spray: case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of a combination of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and haemoglobin spray in radiation ulcer treatment. METHOD: We reviewed the available literature and present a case report in which radiation ulcer was treated with a combination of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and haemoglobin spray. RESULTS: After 30 sessions of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (2.4 ATA; 90 minutes each session) and administration of haemoglobin spray, the wounds showed gradual progress towards healing and a good granulating base was achieved. The wounds were closed after two months using a small split thickness skin graft. CONCLUSION: A combination of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and haemoglobin spray was effective as a short course of treatment for radiation ulcers.