Clinical activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab, and TMZ in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: There are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m²orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria. RESULTS: The mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217-4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0-55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: In this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate.

MRI Treatment Response Assessment Maps (TRAMs) for differentiating recurrent glioblastoma from radiation necrosis.

BACKGROUND: MRI treatment response assessment maps (TRAMs) were introduced to distinguish recurrent malignant glioma from therapy related changes. TRAMs are calculated with two contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences and reflect the "late" wash-out (or contrast clearance) and wash-in of gadolinium. Vital tumor cells are assumed to produce a wash-out because of their high turnover rate and the associated hypervascularization, whereas contrast medium slowly accumulates in scar tissue. To examine the real value of this method, we compared TRAMs with the pathology findings obtained after a second biopsy or surgery when recurrence was suspected. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated TRAMs in adult patients with histologically demonstrated glioblastoma, contrast-enhancing tissue and a pre-operative MRI between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. Only patients with a second biopsy or surgery were evaluated. Volumes of the residual tumor, contrast clearance and contrast accumulation before the second surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 339 patients with mGBM who underwent MRI, we identified 29 repeated surgeries/biopsies in 27 patients 59 ± 12 (mean ± standard deviation) years of age. Twenty-eight biopsies were from patients with recurrent glioblastoma histology, and only one was from a patient with radiation necrosis. We volumetrically evaluated the 29 pre-surgery TRAMs. In recurrent glioblastoma, the ratio of wash-out volume to tumor volume was 36 ± 17% (range 1-73%), and the ratio of the wash-out volume to the sum of wash-out and wash-in volumes was 48 ± 21% (range 22-92%). For the one biopsy with radiation necrosis, the ratios were 42% and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Typical recurrent glioblastoma shows a > 20%ratio of the wash-out volume to the sum of wash-out and wash-in volumes. The one biopsy with radiation necrosis indicated that such necrosis can also produce high wash-out in individual cases. Nevertheless, the additional information provided by TRAMs increases the reliability of diagnosis.

Health-related quality of life and neurocognitive functioning in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition.

PURPOSE: After glioblastoma (GB) recurrence, prognosis is very cumbersome. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and neurocognitive functioning (NCF) have become important endpoints in clinical trials when evaluating novel treatments. We aimed to evaluate the HRQoL and NCF in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) treated with a combination of surgical intervention (reoperation or biopsy) and intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition. METHODS: Patients who participated in the trial (N = 23), at a single-center university hospital were included. Data were collected using 3 patient-reported outcome measures (EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BN20, and HADS) and computerized NCF testing. In the responder group, baseline values were compared to results at a 6-month follow-up. Additionally, exploratory analyses compared baseline HRQoL and NCF between responders and non-responders. RESULTS: There were five responders and 18 non-responders. When comparing the mean and individual baseline with follow-up results for the responders, we observed overall a stable to slight clinically relevant improvement of HRQoL in multiple subsets of the questionnaires while maintaining a stable NCF. One patient deteriorated on anxiety and depression symptoms from baseline to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients that responded to intracerebral immunotherapy in our institutional trial, HRQoL and NCF remained stable over time, suggesting that no detrimental effect on cognitive function or quality of life may be expected with this treatment approach. Furthermore, there seems to be an overall tendency for responders to score better on HRQoL and NCF than non-responders at baseline.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus combined stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma; a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.

Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is a brain tumor that is resistant to standard treatments. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive radiation technique, it cannot fully prevent tumor recurrence and progression. Bevacizumab blocks tumor blood supply and has been approved for rGBM. However, the best way to combine SRS and bevacizumab is still unclear. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing SRS alone and SRS plus bevacizumab for rGBM. We searched three databases for articles published until June 2023. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA v.17. Our meta-analysis included 20 studies with 926 patients. We found that the combination therapy had a significantly lower rate of overall survival (OS) than SRS alone at 6-month 0.77[95%CI:0.74-0.85] for SRS alone and (100%) for SRS plus bevacizumab. At 1-year OS, 0.39 [95%CI: 0.32-0.47] for SRS alone and 0.61 [95%CI:0.44-0.77] for SRS plus bevacizumab (P-value:0.02). However, this advantage was not seen in the long term (18 months and two years). Additionally, the combination therapy had lower chances of progression-free survival (PFS) than SRS alone at the 6-month and 1-year time points, but the differences were insignificant. Our study indicates that incorporating bevacizumab with SRS may lead to a short-term increase in OS for rGBM patients but not long-term. Additionally, the PFS rate did not show significant improvement in the group receiving combination therapy. Further clinical trials are necessary to validate the enhanced overall survival with combination therapy for rGBM.

Whole genome sequencing in (recurrent) glioblastoma: challenges related to informed consent procedures and data sharing.

Increased use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) in neuro-oncology for diagnostics and research purposes necessitates a renewed conversation about informed consent procedures and governance structures for sharing personal health data. There is currently no consensus on how to obtain informed consent for WGS in this population. In this narrative review, we analyze the formats and contents of frameworks suggested in literature for WGS in oncology and assess their benefits and limitations. We discuss applicability, specific challenges, and legal context for patients with (recurrent) glioblastoma. This population is characterized by the rarity of the disease, extremely limited prognosis, and the correlation of the stage of the disease with cognitive abilities. Since this has implications for the informed consent procedure for WGS, we suggest that the content of informed consent should be tailor-made for (recurrent) glioblastoma patients.

Recurrent Glioblastoma-Molecular Underpinnings and Evolving Treatment Paradigms.

Glioblastoma is the most common and lethal central nervous system malignancy with a median survival after progression of only 6-9 months. Major biochemical mechanisms implicated in glioblastoma recurrence include aberrant molecular pathways, a recurrence-inducing tumor microenvironment, and epigenetic modifications. Contemporary standard-of-care (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and tumor treating fields) helps to control the primary tumor but rarely prevents relapse. Cytoreductive treatment such as surgery has shown benefits in recurrent glioblastoma; however, its use remains controversial. Several innovative treatments are emerging for recurrent glioblastoma, including checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, oncolytic virotherapy, nanoparticle delivery, laser interstitial thermal therapy, and photodynamic therapy. This review seeks to provide readers with an overview of (1) recent discoveries in the molecular basis of recurrence; (2) the role of surgery in treating recurrence; and (3) novel treatment paradigms emerging for recurrent glioblastoma.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals tumor heterogeneity, microenvironment, and drug-resistance mechanisms of recurrent glioblastoma.

Glioblastomas are highly heterogeneous brain tumors. Despite the availability of standard treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), i.e., Stupp protocol, which involves surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, glioblastoma remains refractory to treatment and recurrence is inevitable. Moreover, the biology of recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. Increasing evidence has shown that intratumoral heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment contribute to therapeutic resistance. However, the interaction between intracellular heterogeneity and drug resistance in recurrent GBMs remains controversial. The aim of this study was to map the transcriptome landscape of cancer cells and the tumor heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment in recurrent and drug-resistant GBMs at a single-cell resolution and further explore the mechanism of drug resistance of GBMs. We analyzed six tumor tissue samples from three patients with primary GBM and three patients with recurrent GBM in which recurrence and drug resistance developed after treatment with the standard Stupp protocol using single-cell RNA sequencing. Using unbiased clustering, nine major cell clusters were identified. Upregulation of the expression of stemness-related and cell-cycle-related genes was observed in recurrent GBM cells. Compared with the initial GBM tissues, recurrent GBM tissues showed a decreased proportion of microglia, consistent with previous reports. Finally, vascular endothelial growth factor A expression and the blood-brain barrier permeability were high, and the O6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase-related signaling pathway was activated in recurrent GBM. Our results delineate the single-cell map of recurrent glioblastoma, tumor heterogeneity, tumor microenvironment, and drug-resistance mechanisms, providing new insights into treatment strategies for recurrent glioblastomas.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Re-irradiation and Anti-PDL1 Durvalumab Combination in Recurrent Glioblastoma: STERIMGLI Phase I Results.

BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT) is a salvage option for recurrent glioblastoma (GB) which may synergize anti-PDL1 treatment. This phase I study evaluated the safety and the recommended phase II dose of anti-PDL1 durvalumab combined with hFSRT in patients with recurrent GB. METHODS: Patients were treated with 24 Gy, 8 Gy per fraction on days 1, 3, and 5 combined with the first 1500 mg Durvalumab dose on day 5, followed by infusions q4weeks until progression or for a maximum of 12 months. A standard 3 + 3 Durvalumab dose de-escalation design was used. Longitudinal lymphocytes count, cytokines analyses on plasma samples, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were collected. RESULTS: Six patients were included. One dose limiting toxicity, an immune-related grade 3 vestibular neuritis related to Durvalumab, was reported. Median progression-free interval (PFI) and overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 16.7 months, respectively. Multi-modal deep learning-based analysis including MRI, cytokines, and lymphocytes/neutrophil ratio isolated the patients presenting pseudoprogression, the longest PFI and those with the longest OS, but statistical significance cannot be established considering phase I data only. CONCLUSION: Combination of hFSRT and Durvalumab in recurrent GB was well tolerated in this phase I study. These encouraging results led to an ongoing randomized phase II. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02866747).

Using EGFR amplification to stratify recurrent glioblastoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

PURPOSE: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have had success with various malignancies, their efficacy in brain cancer is still unclear. Retrospective and prospective studies using PD-1 inhibitors for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) have not established survival benefit. This study evaluated if ICI may be effective for select patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with first recurrence GBM and received pembrolizumab or nivolumab with or without concurrent bevacizumab. Archival tissue was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and targeted DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. RESULTS: Median overall survival (mOS) from initial diagnosis was 24.5 months (range 10-42). mOS from onset of ICI was 10 months (range 1-31) with 75% surviving > 6 months and 46% > 12 months. Additional IHC analysis on tumors from eight patients demonstrated a trend of longer survival after ICI for those with elevated PD-L1 expression. NGS of samples from 15 patients identified EGFR amplification at initial diagnosis and at any time point to be associated with worse survival after ICI (HR 12.2, 95% CI 1.37-108, p = 0.025 and HR 3.92, 95% CI 1.03-14.9, p = 0.045, respectively). This significance was corroborated with previously tested EGFR amplification via in situ hybridization. CONCLUSION: ICI did not extend overall survival for recurrent GBM. However, molecular sequencing identified EGFR amplification as associated with worse survival. Prospective studies can validate if EGFR amplification is a biomarker of ICI resistance and determine if its use can stratify responders from non-responders.

Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary tumor in the brain, with poor prognosis and limited effective therapies. Although Bevacizumab (BEV) has shown promise in extending progression-free survival (PFS) treating GBM, there is no evidence for its ability to prolong overall survival (OS). Given the uncertainty surrounding BEV treatment strategies, we aimed to provide an evidence map associated with BEV therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the period from January 1, 1970, to March 1, 2022, for studies reporting the prognoses of patients with rGBM receiving BEV. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). The secondary endpoints were PFS, steroid use reduction, and risk of adverse effects. A scoping review and an evidence map were conducted to explore the optimal BEV treatment (including combination regimen, dosage, and window of opportunity). RESULTS: Patients with rGBM could gain benefits in PFS, palliative, and cognitive advantages from BEV treatment, although the OS benefits could not be verified with high-quality evidence. Furthermore, BEV combined therapy (especially with lomustine and radiotherapy) showed higher efficacy than BEV monotherapy in the survival of patients with rGBM. Specific molecular alterations (IDH mutation status) and clinical features (large tumor burden and double-positive sign) could predict better responses to BEV administration. A low dosage of BEV showed equal efficacy to the recommended dose, but the optimal opportunity window for BEV administration remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Although OS benefits from BEV-containing regimens could not be verified in this scoping review, the PFS benefits and side effects control supported BEV application in rGBM. Combining BEV with novel treatments like tumor-treating field (TTF) and administration at first recurrence may optimize the therapeutic efficacy. rGBM with a low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCL), large tumor burden, or IDH mutation is more likely to benefit from BEV treatment. High-quality studies are warranted to explore the combination modality and identify BEV-response subpopulations to maximize benefits.

Recent advances and future challenges of tumor vaccination therapy for recurrent glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant CNS tumor with a highest incidence rate, and most patients would undergo a recurrence. Recurrent GBM (rGBM) shows an increasing resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, leading to a significantly poorer prognosis and the urgent need for novel treatments. Immunotherapy, a rapidly developing anti-tumor therapy in recent years, has shown its potential value in rGBM. Recent studies on PD-1 immunotherapy and CAR-T therapy have shown some efficacy, but the outcome was not as expected. Tumor vaccination is the oldest approach of immunotherapies, which has returned to the research focus because of the failure of other strategies and subversive understanding of CNS. The isolation effect of blood brain barrier and the immunosuppressive cell infiltration could lead to resistance existing in all phases of the anti-tumor immune response, where novel tumor vaccines have been designed to overcome these problems through new tumor antigenic targets and regulatory of the systematic immune response. In this review, the immunological characteristics of CNS and GBM would be discussed and summarized, as well as the mechanism of each novel tumor vaccine for rGBM. And through the review of completed early-phase studies and ongoing large-scale phase III clinical trials, evaluation could be conducted for potential immune response, biosecurity and initial clinical outcome, which further draw a panorama of this vital research field and provide some deep thoughts for the prospective tendency of vaccination strategy. Video Abstract.

A phase I clinical trial of sonodynamic therapy combined with temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is poor, and there is currently no effective treatment strategy. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is a new method for cancer treatment that uses a combination of low-frequency ultrasound and sonosensitisers to produce antitumor effects, which have shown good therapeutic effects in preclinical studies. Therefore, we initiated an open, prospective pilot study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of SDT for the treatment of rGBM. METHODS: Nine patients with rGBM were enrolled who had received multiple treatments, but the nidus continued to progress without additional standard treatments. After MRI localisation, porphyrin drugs were injected, and intermittent low-frequency ultrasound therapy was performed for five days. RESULTS: None of the nine patients in this clinical trial showed any clinical, neurological, haematological, or skin-targeted adverse effects associated with SDT. After the completion of the trial, one patient maintained stable disease, and eight patients experienced disease progression. Among the eight with progressive disease, the median progression-free survival time was 84 days. Four patients died, and the median overall survival duration after recurrence was 202.5 days. CONCLUSION: The number of patients in this study was small; therefore, a long-term survival benefit was not demonstrated. However, this study suggests that SDT has potential as a treatment for rGBM and warrants further exploration. Trial information: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/ ): ChiCTR2200065992. November 2, 2022, retrospectively registered.

The evolving role of reirradiation in the management of recurrent brain tumors.

Despite aggressive management consisting of surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and systemic therapy given alone or in combination, a significant proportion of patients with brain tumors will experience tumor recurrence. For these patients, no standard of care exists and management of either primary or metastatic recurrent tumors remains challenging.Advances in imaging and RT technology have enabled more precise tumor localization and dose delivery, leading to a reduction in the volume of health brain tissue exposed to high radiation doses. Radiation techniques have evolved from three-dimensional (3-D) conformal RT to the development of sophisticated techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic techniques, either stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Several studies have suggested that a second course of RT is a feasible treatment option in patients with a recurrent tumor; however, survival benefit and treatment related toxicity of reirradiation, given alone or in combination with other focal or systemic therapies, remain a controversial issue.We provide a critical overview of the current clinical status and technical challenges of reirradiation in patients with both recurrent primary brain tumors, such as gliomas, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and meningiomas, and brain metastases. Relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate radiation technique and patient selection, the optimal radiation dose and fractionation, tolerance of the brain to a second course of RT, and the risk of adverse radiation effects have been critically discussed.

Magnetic resonance imaging-derived parameters to predict response to regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor, approved as a preferred regimen for recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). Although its effects on prolonging survival could seem modest, it is still unclear whether a subset of patients, potentially identifiable by imaging biomarkers, might experience a more substantial positive effect. Our aim was to evaluate the potential value of magnetic resonance imaging-derived parameters as non-invasive biomarkers to predict response to regorafenib in patients with rGB. METHODS: 20 patients with rGB underwent conventional and advanced MRI at diagnosis (before surgery), at recurrence and at first follow-up (3 months) during regorafenib. Maximum relative cerebral blood volume (rCBVmax) value, intra-tumoral susceptibility signals (ITSS), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and contrast-enhancing tumor volumes were tested for correlation with response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Response at first follow-up was assessed according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. RESULTS: 8/20 patients showed stable disease at first follow-up. rCBVmax values of the primary glioblastoma (before surgery) significantly correlated to treatment response; specifically, patients with stable disease displayed higher rCBVmax compared to progressive disease (p = 0.04, 2-group t test). Moreover, patients with stable disease showed longer PFS (p = 0.02, 2-group t test) and OS (p = 0.04, 2-group t test). ITSS, ADC values, and contrast-enhancing tumor volumes showed no correlation with treatment response, PFS nor OS. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that rCBVmax of the glioblastoma at diagnosis could serve as a non-invasive biomarker of treatment response to regorafenib in patients with rGB.

Repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma in the temozolomide era: a real-world multi-centre study.

INTRODUCTION: In contrast to standard-of-care treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, there is limited consensus on therapy upon disease progression. The role of resection for recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. This study aimed to identify factors for overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) as well as to validate an existing prediction model. METHODS: This was a multi-centre retrospective study that reviewed consecutive adult patients from 2006 to 2019 that received a repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma. The primary endpoint was PPS defined as from the date of second surgery until death. RESULTS: 1032 glioblastoma patients were identified and 190 (18%) underwent resection for recurrence. Patients that had second surgery were more likely to be younger (<70 years) (adjusted OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.6), to have non-eloquent region tumours (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.6) and received temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (aOR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.4). Resection for recurrent tumour was an independent predictor for OS (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3-1.7) (mOS: 16.9 months versus 9.8 months). For patients that previously received temozolomide chemoradiotherapy and subsequent repeat resection (137, 13%), the median PPS was 9.0 months (IQR: 5.0-17.5). Independent PPS predictors for this group were a recurrent tumour volume of >50cc (aOR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4-0.9), local recurrence (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-3.3) and 5-ALA fluorescence-guided resection during second surgery (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.8). A National Institutes of Health Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Scale score of 0 conferred an mPPS of 10.0 months, a score of 1-2, 9.0 months and a score of 3, 4.0 months (log-rank test, p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgery for recurrent glioblastoma can be beneficial in selected patients and carries an acceptable morbidity rate. The pattern of recurrence influenced PPS and the NIH Recurrent GBM Scale was a reliable prognostication tool.

Comparison between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [18F]FET PET as Imaging Biomarkers in Adult Recurrent Glioblastoma.

The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the potential of the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting ligand, [68Ga]-PSMA-Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-2-naphthyl-L-Ala-cyclohexane-DOTA ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617) as a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging biomarker in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET scans on two separate days. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 tumour selectivity was assessed by comparing tumour volume delineation and by assessing the intra-patient correlation between tumour uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [18F]FET PET images. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 tumour specificity was evaluated by comparing its tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR) with [18F]FET TBR and its tumour volume with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast-enhancing (CE) tumour volume. Ten patients were recruited in this study. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617-avid tumour volume was larger than the [18F]FET tumour volume (p = 0.063). There was a positive intra-patient correlation (median Pearson r = 0.51; p < 0.0001) between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [18F]FET in the tumour volume. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 had significantly higher TBR (p = 0.002) than [18F]FET. The [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617-avid tumour volume was larger than the CE tumour volume (p = 0.0039). Overall, accumulation of [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-617 beyond [18F]FET-avid tumour regions suggests the presence of neoangiogenesis in tumour regions that are not overly metabolically active yet. Higher tumour specificity suggests that [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-617 could be a better imaging biomarker for recurrent tumour delineation and secondary treatment planning than [18F]FET and CE MRI.

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of neuropathology in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults.

TARGET POPULATION: These recommendations apply to adult patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does testing for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 mutations provide new additional management or prognostic information beyond that derived from the tumor at initial presentation? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Repeat IDH mutation testing is not necessary if the tumor is histologically similar to the primary tumor and the patient's clinical course is as expected. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does repeat testing for MGMT promoter methylation provide new or additional management or prognostic information beyond that derived from the tumor at initial presentation and what methods of detection are optimal? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Repeat MGMT promoter methylation is not recommended. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does EGFR amplification or mutation testing provide management or prognostic information beyond that provided by histologic analysis and if performed on previous tissue samples, does it need to be repeated? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: In cases that are difficult to classify as glioblastoma on histologic features EGFR amplification testing may help in classification. If a previous EGFR amplification was detected, repeat testing is not necessary. Repeat EGFR amplification or mutational testing may be recommended in patients in which target therapy is being considered. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does large panel or whole genome sequencing provide management or prognostic information beyond that derived from histologic analysis? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Primary or repeat large panel or whole genome sequencing may be considered in patients who are eligible or interested in molecularly guided therapy or clinical trials. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma should immune checkpoint biomarker testing be performed to provide management and prognostic information beyond that obtained from histologic analysis? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: The current evidence does not support making PD-L1 or mismatch repair (MMR) enzyme activity a component of standard testing. QUESTION: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma are there meaningful biomarkers for bevacizumab responsiveness and does their assessment provide additional information for tumor management and prognosis beyond that learned by standard histologic analysis? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: No established Bevacizumab biomarkers are currently available based upon the inclusion criteria of this guideline.

Comparison of tumor immune environment between newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma including matched patients.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal primary brain tumor in adult patients. The disease progression, response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy at initial diagnosis, and prognosis are profoundly associated with the tumor microenvironment, especially the features of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TII). Recurrent GBM is even more challenging to manage. Differences in the immune environment between newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM and an association with tumor prognosis are not well defined. METHODS: To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed the clinical data and tissue specimens from 24 GBM patients (13 at initial diagnosis and 11 at recurrence). The expression levels of multiple immunobiological markers in patients' GBM at initial diagnosis versus at recurrence were compared, including five patients with both specimens available (paired). The distribution patterns of TII were evaluated in both the intratumoral and perivascular regions. RESULTS: We found that tumors from recurrent GBM have significantly more tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and macrophages and higher PD-L1 and PD-1 expression than tumors at primary diagnosis and benign brain specimens from epilepsy surgery. The pattern changes of the TILs and macrophages of the five paired specimens were consistent with the unpaired patients, while the CD8 to CD4 ratio remained constant from diagnosis to recurrence in the paired tissues. The levels of TILs, macrophages, PD-1 or PD-L1+ cells at initial diagnosis did not correlate with OS. TILs, macrophages, and PD-1+ cells were increased in recurrent tumors both in intratumoral and perivascular areas, with higher distribution levels in intratumoral than perivascular regions. Higher CD4 or CD8 infiltration at recurrence was associated with a worse prognosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study elucidated that TIL and TAM tend to accumulate in perivascular region and are more abundant in recurrent GBM than newly diagnosed GBM.

Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in recurrent glioblastoma: a new prognostic factor?

BACKGROUND: For recurrent glioblastoma (GB) patients, several therapy options have been established over the last years such as more aggressive surgery, re-irradiation or chemotherapy. Age and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) are used to make decisions for these patients as these are established as prognostic factors in the initial diagnosis of GB. This study's aim was to evaluate preoperative patient comorbidities by using the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) as a prognostic factor for recurrent GB patients. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis we could include 123 patients with surgery for primary recurrence of GB from January 2007 until December 2016 (43 females, 80 males, mean age 57 years (range 21-80 years)). Preoperative age, sex, ACCI, KPSS and adjuvant treatment regimes were recorded for each patient. Extent of resection (EOR) was recorded as a complete/incomplete resection of the contrast-enhancing tumor part. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.1-10.9 months) after first re-resection. Preoperative KPSS > 80% (P < 0.001) and EOR (P = 0.013) were associated with significantly improved survival in univariate analysis. Including these factors in multivariate analysis, preoperative KPSS < 80 (HR 2.002 [95% CI: 1.246-3.216], P = 0.004) and EOR are the only significant prognostic factor (HR 1.611 [95% CI: 1.036-2.505], P = 0.034). ACCI was not shown as a prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: For patients with surgery for recurrent glioblastoma, the ACCI does not add further information about patient's prognosis besides the well-established KPSS and extent of resection.

Does interventional MRI-guided brain cryotherapy cause a blood-brain barrier disruption? Radiological analysis and perspectives.

Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor with an incidence of 5/100,000 inhabitants/year and a 5-year survival rate of 6.8%. Despite recent advances in the molecular biology understanding of glioblastoma, CNS chemotherapy remains challenging because of the impermeable blood-brain barrier (BBB). Interventional MRI-guided brain cryotherapy (IMRgC) is technique that creates a tissue lesion by making a severe targeted hypothermia and possibly a BBB disruption. This study goal was to analyze the effect of IMRgC on human BBB glioblastoma through its gadolinium enhancing features. All patients harboring a local glioblastoma recurrence and meeting all the inclusion criteria were consecutively included into this retrospective study during a 2-year period. The primary endpoint was to analyze the modification of the gadolinium enhancement on MRI T1 sequences using MR perfusion weighted images during follow-up. The secondary endpoint was to assess any ischemic/hemorrhagic complication following cryotherapy procedure using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). Among the 6 patients studied, all (100%) showed a BBB disruption on the cryotherapy site through the analysis of the perfusion weighted images with an average delay of 2.83 months following the procedure. The gadolinium enhancement located around the cavity then spontaneously decreased in 4/6 patients (67%). No ischemic or hemorrhagic complication was recorded. This study confirms the IMRgC capacity to disrupt BBB as already suggested by the literature. IMRgC might represent a new option in the management of GBM allowing the combined effect of direct cryoablation and enhanced chemotherapy.