RESUMO
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common malignancy with the aggressive cSCC subtype being especially worrisome due to its higher metastatic and mortality rate. An 80-year-old immunocompetent Caucasian man presented with a locally advanced and recurrent cSCC for which he underwent six Mohs surgeries, radiation therapy, and standard immunotherapy treatments. Throughout treatment, the patient's cancer continued to progress across different regions of the face. Biopsy and analysis were performed and showed that the cSCCs had a high mutational burden and oncogenes known to be present in tumors with aggressive nature. After the algorithmically applied standard of care failed to cure or control the progressing disease, the genetic analysis favored dostarlimab as a suitable option. With only three doses of 500 mg dostarlimab q3 weeks, the patient showed a fast response with macroscopic resolution of clinically discernible disease of, the previously noted, locally advanced cSCC on his right forehead, as well as other primary keratinocyte carcinomas on his left contralateral face, nose, left leg, and neck. This remarkable case can present an option for complex patients with locally advanced and recurrent cSCC who failed the current standard of care. Moreover, it warrants a proper clinical trial to assess efficacy and potential indication of dostarlimab in such patients. Of note is the presence of a KMT2D mutation and its well-identified correlation with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and poor prognosis, which can play an informative role in clinical decision making and precision therapeutic choice at the point of care.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We reviewed outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent (LRR) or new primary (NP) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated at our institution with reirradiation (RRT). METHODS: Patients received definitive RRT (DRRT) or post-operative RRT following salvage surgery (PRRT) from 2003 to 2011. Measured survival outcomes included loco-regional relapse free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 81 patients (PRRT, 42; DRRT, 39), median PRRT and DRRT doses were 60 Gy (12-70 Gy) and 69.6 Gy (48-76.8 Gy). The majority of patients received IMRT-based RRT (n = 77, 95 %). With median follow-up of 78.1 months (95 % CI, 56-96.8 months), 2-year OS was 53 % with PRRT and 48 % with DRRT (p = 0.12); 23 % of patients were alive at last follow-up. LRFS at 2 years was 60 %, and did not differ significantly between PRRT and DRRT groups. A trend toward inferior LRFS was noted among patients receiving chemotherapy with RRT versus RRT alone (p = 0.06). Late serious toxicities were uncommon, including osteoradionecrosis (2 patients) and carotid artery bleeding (1 patient, non-fatal). CONCLUSIONS: OS of PRRT- and DRRT-treated patients in this series appears superior to the published literature. We used IMRT for the majority of patients, in contrast to several series and trials previously reported, which may account in part for this difference. Future studies should seek to improve outcomes among patients with LRR/NP SCCHN via alternative therapeutic modalities such as proton radiotherapy and by incorporating novel systemic agents.