RESUMO
Background: The optimal management of first-time patellar dislocations remains a subject of debate. While surgical intervention is often recommended to reduce the risk of redislocation, the benefits over conservative treatment regarding knee function and complication rates are not clearly established. This systematic review aims to compare the effectiveness of surgical versus conservative treatment in preventing redislocation and improving knee function, while also considering complication rates. Methods: A comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, was conducted up to July 2024. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 411 participants were included. The primary outcome was the redislocation rate, with secondary outcomes including knee function, complication rates, and the need for re-interventions. The quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Results: Surgical treatment generally resulted in lower redislocation rates compared to conservative management. However, the improvement in knee function was inconsistent, with some studies showing no significant differences or even favoring conservative treatment. Surgical intervention was associated with a higher risk of complications and re-interventions, particularly in older studies with less advanced techniques. Conclusions: Surgical intervention appears effective in reducing redislocation rates but comes with a risk of complications. Conservative treatment remains a viable option, particularly for patients with lower activity levels or higher surgical risks. The decision between surgical and conservative management should be individualized, taking into account patient-specific factors and potential risks. Further high-quality research is needed to provide more definitive guidance.
RESUMO
Purpose: There is no consensus for management of patellar instability, even in the case of malalignment. The purpose of the review is to evaluate outcomes in the literature of MPFL reconstruction with and without tibial tubercle osteotomy. Methods: Two databases PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies comparing MPFL reconstruction with and without concomitant tibial tuberosity osteotomy. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Data on functional outcomes via Kujala score, redislocation rates and return to sport rates were reported. Results: 9 studies included data from 806 knees: 463 submitted to isolated MPFL reconstruction, and 343 submitted to the combined surgery. Patients submitted to the combined procedure had all TT-TG values superior to 18, while the ones with isolated reconstruction had more heterogeneous values, varying between 13 and 20 mm. 77.78% of the studies reported on postoperative Kujala scores, with a mean value of 83.53 in patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction alone and 83.72 in those who underwent the combined procedure. The mean difference between the two groups was -0.83, with the improvement of the score statistically significant in 22.22% of the studies, regardless of the surgery. Concerning redislocation rate, odds ratio comparing both procedures was 0.84 (p = 0.67). Conclusion: The principal finding is that the MPFL reconstruction with or without TTO resulted in similar functional outcomes, assessed by the Kujala score, and low complications concerning recurrent patellar dislocation. More robust literature is needed in the setting of a high TT-TG distance. Level of evidence: IV.