Intrathecal morphine delivery at prepontine cistern to control refractory cancer-related pain: a case report of extensive metastatic and refractory cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Extensive metastatic and refractory cancer pain is common, and exhibits a dissatisfactory response to the conventional intrathecal infusion of opioid analgesics. CASE PRESENTATION: The present study reports a case of an extensive metastatic esophageal cancer patient with severe intractable pain, who underwent translumbar subarachnoid puncture with intrathecal catheterization to the prepontine cistern. After continuous infusion of low-dose morphine, the pain was well-controlled with a decrease in the numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain score from 9 to 0, and the few adverse reactions to the treatment disappeared at a low dose of morphine. CONCLUSIONS: The patient achieved a good quality of life during the one-month follow-up period.

Availability of and factors related to interventional procedures for refractory pain in patients with cancer: a nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain may be refractory to standard pharmacological treatment. Interventional procedures are important for quality of analgesia. The aim of the present study was to clarify the availability of four interventional procedures (celiac plexus neurolysis/splanchnic nerve neurolysis, phenol saddle block, epidural analgesia, and intrathecal analgesia), the number of procedures performed by specialists, and their associated factors. In addition, we aimed to establish how familiar home hospice physicians and oncologists are with the different interventional procedures available to manage cancer pain. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted. Subjects were certified pain specialists, interventional radiologists, home hospice physicians, and clinical oncologists. RESULTS: The numbers of valid responses/mails were 545/1,112 for pain specialists, 554/1,087 for interventional radiology specialists, 144/308 for home hospice physicians, and 412/800 for oncologists. Among pain specialists, depending on intervention, 40.9-75.2% indicated that they perform each procedure by themselves, and 47.5-79.8% had not performed any of the procedures in the past 3 years. Pain specialists had performed the four procedures 4,591 times in the past 3 years. Among interventional radiology specialists, 18.1% indicated that they conduct celiac plexus neurolysis/splanchnic nerve neurolysis by themselves. Interventional radiology specialists had performed celiac plexus neurolysis/splanchnic nerve neurolysis 202 times in the past 3 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of patients seen for cancer pain and the perceived difficulty in gaining experience correlated with the implementation of procedures among pain specialists. Among home hospice physicians and oncologists, depending on intervention, 3.5-27.1% responded that they were unfamiliar with each procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Although pain specialists responded that the implementation of each intervention was possible, the actual number of the interventions used was limited. As interventional procedures are well known, it is important to take measures to ensure that pain specialists and interventional radiology physicians are sufficiently utilized to manage refractory cancer pain.

Methadone switching for refractory cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Methadone is commonly considered an alternative opioid treatment for refractory cancer pain. This study aims to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost of methadone in the treatment of refractory cancer pain. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in patients who used methadone for refractory cancer pain from April 2016 to December 2020 at a cancer specialized hospital. Pain control, evaluated via pain score and breakthrough pain frequency, and adverse events of methadone were compared with analgesic regimens prior to methadone administration. The factors potentially affecting the switching outcome were analyzed via multivariate analysis. Moreover, the cost of pain control was estimated. RESULTS: Ninety patients received methadone for poor pain control (74.4%), intolerable adverse events (10.0%), or both (15.6%) after prior opioid treatments. Sixty-four patients (71.1%) were successfully switched to methadone with median pain score significantly decreased from 4.0 to 2.0 (p < 0.001) and median daily frequency of breakthrough pain from 3.0 to 0.0 (p < 0.001) at a maintained median conversion ratio of 6.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 4.0-10.0] to prior opioid treatment. Similar adverse event profiles of constipation, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness were observed between methadone and prior opioid regimens. The median daily cost of analgesic regimens was significantly reduced from $19.5 (IQR: 12.3-46.2) to $10.8 (IQR: 7.1-18.7) (p < 0.01) after switching to methadone. The 3-day switch method significantly improved the rate of successful switching compared with the stop and go method (odds ratio = 3.37, 95% CI: 1.30-8.76, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Methadone is an effective, safe, and cost-saving treatment for patients with refractory cancer pain.

Gabapentin enhances the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal morphine in refractory cancer pain patients.

PURPOSE: Morphine infusion through Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS) is widely used to relieve refractory cancer pain. However, continuous escalation of morphine dose caused by opioid tolerance and/or progress of cancer was commonly observed. Combining morphine with medications of different analgesic mechanisms is applied to blunt the rate of morphine increase. The purpose of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of combining gabapentin with morphine after IDDS implantation. METHODS: This study compared patients that received IDDS implantation from January 1, 2017 to November 10, 2018 in our institute. Key outcomes included change in mean pain score, dose of morphine used in patients, percentage of patients with 30% and 50% reduction in mean pain score, Patient Global Impression of Change scores, breakthrough pain characters and side effects. RESULTS: 34 patients in the combination group (morphine + gabapentin) and 40 patients in the monotherapy group(morphine)were analyzed. The results showed that both therapy groups achieved similar analgesic efficacy, demonstrated by Numerical rating scale (2.42 ± 0.88 vs 2.57 ± 0.85; Combination vs Monotherapy), PGIC and responder status. Mean daily dose of morphine was significantly lower in combination group compared to monotherapy group (3.54 ± 1.29 mg vs 4.64 ± 1.28 mg, P = 0.007). More patients experienced dizziness and somnolence after receiving combination therapy compared to morphine-alone treatment although no statistical significance was found (P = 0.49). CONCLUSION: Addition of gabapentin achieved similar analgesic efficacy with lower dose of morphine compared to morphine alone accompanying with higher incidence of dizziness and somnolence.

Methadone in Cancer Pain.

Methadone has been an unique, versatile, cost effective, synthetic opioid utilized in nociceptive as well as neuropathic pain. Pain and palliative care physicians started accepting methadone in treatment of complex pain associated with advanced cancer and neuropathic pain syndromes in which conventional opioids were no longer effective. The challenge is in accepting methadone as a main stream first line opioid, from being considered as a second line replacement/substitution drug all these years. Methadone has a significant role as opioid rotation in refractory cancer pain, especially when started early leading to successful conversion. Advantages of methadone in paediatric patients with advanced cancer were its safety and efficacy as a first-choice opioid, availability as a liquid formulation and its infrequent dose requirements. Methadone is neither recommended nor justified to be used as an anti-cancer drug and its role as an anti-cancer agent is a misconception. Many guidelines were proposed after 2008 to address methadone safety. Most of them emphasized on prevention of cardiac arrhythmia and association of methadone with QTc prolongation rather than address the real issue. Methadone has been established to be safe when used in opioid naïve patients with careful titration instituted in an ambulatory setting and has equal success in opioid rotation in outpatient setup. Methadone prescription should be carried out by experienced pain and palliative care providers with careful dose titration and clinical monitoring.

Implementing practice change in chronic cancer pain management: clinician response to a phase III study of ketamine.

BACKGROUND: An adequately powered, double-blind, multisite, randomised controlled trial has shown no net clinical benefit for subcutaneous ketamine over placebo in the management of cancer pain refractory to combination opioid and co-analgesic therapy. The results of the trial were disseminated widely both nationally and internationally. AIM: To determine whether the trial had impacted on clinical practice in Australasia. METHODS: Members of the Australia and New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine were sent an online ketamine utilisation survey. RESULTS: A total of 123/392 clinicians responded (31% response rate). The majority of respondents had practised for more than 10 years in a metropolitan hospital setting. Ketamine had been prescribed by 91% of respondents, and 92% were aware of the trial. As a result, 65% of respondents had changed practice (17% no longer prescribed ketamine, 46% used less and 2% more). Thirty-five per cent had not changed practice. Reasons for change included belief in the results of the study, concerns over the toxicity reported or because there were alternatives for pain control. Of those who prescribed less, over 80% were more selective and would now only use the drug in certain clinical situations or pain types, or when all other medications had failed. CONCLUSIONS: Although two-thirds of respondents reported practice change as a result of the randomised controlled trial, a minority remained convinced of the benefit of the drug from their own observations and would require additional evidence.

Methadone Conversion Using a 3-Day Switch Strategy in Patients with Cancer on High-Dose Opioids: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Methadone has shown effectiveness in pain control in patients with cancer who are intolerant to other opioids in China. However, the optimal strategy for methadone conversion from previous high doses of opioids in refractory cancer pain remains debatable. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of a 3-day switch (3DS) strategy for methadone conversion in patients with refractory cancer pain on high doses of opioids. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30-day medical records of 70 patients with refractory cancer pain who used a 3DS strategy for methadone conversion from previous high doses of opioids from July 2018 to December 2022. The 3DS strategy indicated that the methadone dose was increased by one third every day for 3 days. Data on the rate of successful conversion, the time to stable analgesia after conversion, the conversion efficiency, the corrected QT (QTc) interval, the actual conversion ratios, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy patients received 3DS methadone conversion and 64 patients were eligible for analysis. Fifty patients (78%) achieved stable analgesia, and the median time to stable analgesia was 8.14 ± 2.70 (range 6-14) days. The average dose of methadone was 77.94 ± 42.74 mg. The most common AEs (≥ 10%) included constipation, dry mouth, nausea, and cold sweats. The incidence of constipation was reduced post-methadone conversion, and a statistically significant but asymptomatic prolongation of the QTc interval was observed. Additionally, the actual conversion ratios were lower than Ayonrinde's recommended ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The 3DS strategy for methadone conversion is applicable in Chinese patients with refractory cancer pain on high doses of opioids.

The Efficacy of Ketamine for Acute and Chronic Pain in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Managing cancer-related pain poses significant challenges, prompting research into alternative approaches such as ketamine. This systematic review aims to analyze and summarize the impact of ketamine as an adjuvant to opioid therapy for cancer-related pain. We conducted a literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus from 1 January 1982 to 20 October 2023. Abstracts were screened against inclusion criteria, and eligible studies underwent a full-text review. Data was extracted from the included studies, and a framework analysis approach summarized the evidence regarding ketamine's use in patients with cancer. A total of 21 randomized clinical trials were included, and the quality of all the included studies was good or fair. Significant improvements in pain scores and reduced morphine consumption were consistently observed with intravenous ketamine administration for postoperative pain control, particularly when combined with other analgesics such as morphine. Ketamine was less effective when used as an analgesic for chronic pain management, with several studies on neuropathic pain or chemotherapy-induced neuropathy finding minimal significant effect on reduction of pain scores or morphine requirements. The efficacy of ketamine in pain management appears to depend on factors such as dosage, route of administration, and patient population.

Ganglion Impar Neurolysis to Treat Refractory Chronic Pain From Vulvar Cancer: A Case Report.

Cancer pain treatment currently consists of the administration of pain medications, radiation therapy, tumor ablation as well as neurolytic plexus blocks. Neurolytic plexus blocks target both sensory afferent fibers and sympathetic fibers innervating visceral organs. Finding the right block for a specific type and location of cancer-related pain is crucial for the successful control of pain. One such example is a ganglion impar block for perineal pain. We report a case of a patient with chronic severe perineal pain from vulvar cancer and multiple surgeries, for whom a ganglion impar block followed by neurolysis provided significant pain relief.

Current Status of Cognition and Clinical Practice of Refractory Cancer Pain in Shanghai: A Questionnaire Survey.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the current status of clinical practice of refractory cancer pain (RCP) among a sample of physicians specializing in cancer pain management in Shanghai. Methods: From 2019 to 2021, a questionnaire survey was conducted among physicians engaged in diagnosis and treatment of cancer pain through the questionnaire WJX network platform in Shanghai, China. Results: A total of 238 responses participated in the survey. This survey reports physicians' understanding and incidence rate of breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP). The choice of analgesics and satisfaction of analgesic effect were investigated. We also investigated doctors' knowledge of the diagnostic criteria for RCP and their tendency to choose analgesics. Oral immediate-release morphine and intravenous or subcutaneous morphine injection have been the common treatment approach for transient cancer pain exacerbations. The main barriers to pain management are lack of standardized treatment methods for RCP, lack of knowledge related to RCP, and single drug dosage form. Doctors believe the most necessary measures to improve the current situation of poor cancer pain control include improving medical staff's understanding and treatment techniques for RCP, updating treatment techniques and methods, and improving the configuration of drug types in medical institutions. Clinicians expect to improve understanding and treatment techniques through systematic training. Conclusion: Despite multiple available analgesic measures, the treatment of RCP remains challenging. Improving the understanding of medical staff towards RCP, improving treatment techniques, and increasing the accessibility of multiple drug types are important ways to improve the satisfaction of cancer pain management in the future.

A Phase II Study About Efficacy and Safety of the Continuous IntraVenous Infusion of Ketamine as Adjuvant to Opioids in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients With Refractory Cancer Pain (CIVIK Trial).

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has been used to control refractory cancer pain as an adjuvant to opioids. We conducted a prospective phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 5-day continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) of Ketamine in terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain. METHODS: Hospitalized terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain were enrolled. Refractory cancer pain was indicated by requirements for 4 or more rescue opioids or pain intensity using numerical rating scale > personalized pain goal (PPG) despite of intravenous morphine equivalent daily dose (IV MEDD) ≥ 120 mg/day. The CIVI of ketamine was increased from .05 mg/kg/hour to .5 mg/kg/hour by .05 every 8 hours if pain intensity exceeded PPG or if number of rescue opioids ≥2 during prior 8 hours was required. The primary end-point was overall pain response rate, which indicates complete response (both rescue opioid ≤3/day and pain intensity ≤ PPG) plus partial response (rescue opioid ≤3/day), without unacceptable toxicities. RESULTS: Among 21 eligible patients enrolled between September 2019 and January 2023, 20 were analyzed. Most pain mechanisms were mixed type (n = 15, 75%), with neuropathic component (n = 17, 85%). The baseline background opioids were IV MEDD 186 mg/24hour (range, 124-592), number of rescue opioids was 6 (IQR, 5-9), and median PPG was 4 (IQR, 3-4). The overall pain response rate was 50% (n = 10) including 40% (n = 8) for complete pain response and 10% (n = 2) for partial pain response. CONCLUSION: This study showed efficacy of gradually increasing CIVI of ketamine for terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain. CIVI of ketamine could be a useful tool in these patients considering the limited treatment options. (NCT03362073, Initial Release: November 15, 2017).

Caudal Neuraxial Blocks for Pain Relief From Pelvic Neuropathy Caused by Extensive Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Central neuraxial blocks can be a vital therapeutic tool for neuropathic pain, but they are infrequently implemented for pain management in cancer patients. Upon a literature review, further data on the role or efficacy of central nerve blocks for neuropathic cancer pain would be beneficial. Additionally, evidence-based guidelines and practices are lacking regarding additional interventions for neuropathic pain relief, a common manifestation of cancer burden. Here, we report the case of a 29-year-old male patient who presented in the ED with intractable neuropathic pain from extensive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The patient demonstrated left lower extremity pain, fevers, chills, and tenderness with erythema over the site of his port-a-catheter on his chest. The patient was also hypotensive, despite IV fluid resuscitation. Recent imaging showed a hypermetabolic soft tissue mass in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen. There was also extensive cancer spread in the peripheral pelvis, presacral region, and within multiple sacral foramina, with a secondary perineural spread of the tumor. The patient previously positively responded to a caudal nerve block at an outpatient pain clinic. The patient was admitted to the ICU for three days, and following the resolution of sepsis, the patient received caudal and sciatic nerve blocks on admission day 8. Upon further imaging showing metastasis to the brain, the patient was discharged to inpatient hospice on hospitalization day 10 following a palliative conversation with the patient and family.

Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analyses in Thailand of Continuous Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Compared with Conventional Therapy in Cancer Pain: A 10-year Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Background: Because of the high initial cost of intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD) therapy, this study investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ITDD therapy in refractory cancer pain management in Thailand over the past 10 years. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted in patients with cancer pain who underwent ITDD therapy from January 2011 to 2021 at three university hospitals. Clinical outcomes included the numerical rating scale (NRS), Palliative Performance Scale, and the EQ-5D. The direct medical and nonmedical as well as indirect costs were also recorded. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were performed comparing ITDD therapy with conventional therapy (extrapolated from costs of the same patient before ITDD therapy) from a societally oriented economic evaluation. Results: Twenty patients (F:M: 10:10) aged 60 ± 15 years who underwent implantation of an intrathecal percutaneous port (IT port; n = 15) or programmable intrathecal pump (IT pump; n = 5) were included. The median survival time was 78 (interquartile range = 121-54) days after ITDD therapy. At 2-month follow-up, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/pain reduction of an IT port (US$2065.36 (CA$2829.54)/2-point NRS reduction/lifetime) was lower than for patients with an IT pump (US$5479.26 (CA$7506.58)/2-point NRS reduction/lifetime) compared with continued conventional therapy. The ICER/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained for an IT port compared with conventional treatment was US$93,999.31(CA$128,799.06)/QALY gained, which is above the cost-effectiveness threshold for Thailand. Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of IT port therapy for cancer pain was high relative to the cost of living in Thailand, above the cost-effectiveness threshold. Prospective cost analysis studies enrolling more patients with diverse cancers that investigate the benefit of early ITDD therapy with devices over a range of prices are warranted.

Contexte: En raison du coût initial élevé du traitement par administration intrathécale de médicaments (AIM), cette étude a étudié le rapport coût-efficacité et le rapport coût-utilité du traitement par AIM dans la prise en charge de la douleur cancéreuse réfractaire en Thaïlande au cours des 10 dernières années.Méthodes: L'étude rétrospective a été menée auprès de patients souffrant de douleur cancéreuse ayant subi un traitement par AIM de janvier 2011 et 2021 dans trois hôpitaux universitaires. Les résultats cliniques comprenaient l'échelle d'évaluation numérique (EEN), l'échelle de performance palliative et l'EQ-5D. Les coûts médicaux et non médicaux directs et indirects ont également été consignés. Les analyses coûts-efficacité et coût-utilité ont été effectuées en comparant le traitement par AIM au traitement conventionnel (extrapolé à partir des coûts pour le même patient avant le traitement par AIM) à partir d'une évaluation économique sociétale.Résultats: Vingt patients (F : M : 10 : 10) âgés de 60 ± 15 ans ayant subi l'implantation d'un port percutané intrathécal (port IT; n = 15) ou d'une pompe intrathécale programmable (pompe IT; n = 5) ont été inclus. Le temps de survie médian était de 78 jours (intervalle interquartile = 121­54) après le traitement par AIM. À deux mois de suivi, le ratio coût-efficacité incrémental (RCEI/réduction de la douleur d'un port IT (2 065,36 $ US (2 829,54 $ CA) /réduction de 2 points sur l'EEN/durée de vie) était inférieur à celui des patients avec une pompe IT (5479,26 $ US (7506,58 $ CA) /réduction de 2 points sur l'EEN/durée de vie) comparativement au traitement conventionnel en continu. Le RCEI/année de vie pondérée par la qualité (AVPQ) gagnée pour un port IT comparativement au traitement conventionnel était de 93 999,31 $ US (128 799,06 $ CA) /AVPQ gagné, ce qui est au-dessus du seuil de rentabilité pour la Thaïlande.Conclusion: Le rapport coût-efficacité et le rapport coût-utilité du traitement par port IT pour la douleur cancéreuse étaient élevés par rapport au coût de la vie en Thaïlande, soit au-dessus du seuil de rentabilité. Les études d'analyse de coût prospectives portant sur un plus grand nombre de patients atteints de divers cancers qui étudient les avantages des traitements par AIM précoces à l'aide d'appareils de prix différents sont justifiées.

Comparison of external system and implanted system in intrathecal therapy for refractory cancer pain in China: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal therapy (ITT) via an implanted system was demonstrated for the treatment of refractory cancer pain for decades. Recently, the dissemination of ITT is enhanced in an external system way in Asia for a lower implantation cost. This study compares the efficacy, safety, and cost of the two ITT systems in refractory cancer pain patients in China. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine cancer pain patients who underwent implantation of the ITT system were included. One hundred and three patients received ITT via the external system (external group), while 36 patients received ITT via the implanted system (implanted group). A 1:2 propensity score matching procedure was used to yield a total of 89 patients for the final analysis. Medical records of included patients were retrospectively reviewed and pain scores, incidences of complications, and costs were compared. RESULTS: ITT via the external system provided pain relief as potent as ITT via the implanted system but was less time-consuming in the implantation phase (13 vs. 19 days, p < .01). Nausea/vomiting and urinary retention were the most frequent adverse events in both external and implanted groups (32.14%, 16.07% vs. 36.36%, 21.21%). No significant difference was found in the incidences of all kinds of complications. Compared to the implanted group, the external group cost less for the initial implantation (7268 vs. 26,275 US dollar [USD], p < .001) but had a significant higher maintenance cost (606.62 vs. 20.23 USD calculated monthly, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ITT via the external system is as effective and safe as that via the implanted system and has the advantage of being cheap in the upfront implantation but costs more during the maintenance process in China.

Using a multimodal approach to manage difficult visceral cancer pain: A case study.

Difficult visceral cancer pain is defined as pain that does not improve with conventional non-pharmacological and pharmacological strategies, including opioids and adjuvants, and occurs in up to 15% of patients with cancer. In oncological practice, we must be prepared to establish strategies for dealing with such complex cases. Different analgesic strategies have been described in the literature, including managing refractory pain through palliative sedation; however, this might become a dilemma from a clinical and bioethical point of view in end-of-life situations. We present the case of a young male patient with moderately differentiated intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the left colon, with intra-abdominal sepsis, and for whom despite the multimodal treatment for difficult visceral cancer pain, the pain was refractory leading to palliative sedation. Difficult visceral cancer pain is a pathology that affects the quality of life of patients and is a challenge for pain specialists, for both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management.

A Case Report of Subanesthetic Ketamine Bolus and Infusion for Opioid Refractory Cancer Pain.

Opioids and traditional adjuvant medications are frequently prescribed for the management of moderate to severe cancer pain with good effect. However, there are many cases, in which patients experience severe opioid refractory cancer pain. Ketamine is being used more frequently in the hospice and palliative setting to manage opioid refractory pain, although high-quality evidence regarding its effectiveness is lacking. It seems certain patients respond favorably to ketamine, while others experience no effect. Studies have not yet identified factors associated with a favorable response to ketamine. We present a case describing the successful treatment of high-dose opioid refractory cancer pain with a subanesthetic ketamine infusion and propose the novel use of a preinfusion test bolus of ketamine to identify patients who are likely to respond favorably to an infusion.

Fluoroscopy-Guided Splanchnic Nerve Block for Cancer-Associated Pain.

Pain associated with abdominal malignancies or metastasis can be very severe and can be intractable and resistant to conventional pharmacologic therapies. Typically, narcotics and non-narcotics are used in combination to alleviate the cancer pain, but these are often unsuccessful. Neurolysis and radio-frequency ablation of the celiac plexus and splanchnic nerves is being used with great success for management of the pain associated with abdominal malignancies with added advantages of improving quality of life, pain relief and decreased narcotic consumption. The tumor or associated lymphadenopathy may result in distortion of the celiac plexus anatomy, thus making it hard to reach the celiac plexus. In such cases, splanchnic nerve block can be employed with relative ease as compared to celiac plexus block. Given the nature of the debilitating pain associated with these conditions and inadequate pain relief with narcotics, these blocks are a boon in disguise to such patients with altered anatomy. Post administration of the splanchnic block, the functioning and quality of life of patients with abdominal malignancies improve. Hence, these blocks can be used to decrease the morbidity associated with abdominal malignancies.

Effectiveness of Low-Dose Ketamine Infusion in Opioid Refractory Cancer Pain: A Case Report.

Most patients with advanced cancer experience debilitating pain, which significantly affects their quality of life and has both physical and psychological implications. Opioids have been the mainstay of treatment for chronic cancer pain, but some people develop serious adverse effects or may become refractory to opioid use. There is always a need and search for alternative non-opioid analgesics with an acceptable safety profile, and one such drug is ketamine. In this era of evolving analgesic therapeutics, ketamine has been noted to have favourable results. Ketamine, a phencyclidine analogue, is an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist (NMDA), and it has been shown to have an analgesic effect at sub-anaesthetic doses by blocking NMDA-induced pain sensitization and enhancing opioid receptor sensitization. This is a case report of a 46-year-old Indian female with recurrent metastatic adenocarcinoma endometrium (International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) Grade II) involving the vaginal vault, rectum, and adrenal glands, along with para-rectal, bilateral iliac, and retroperitoneal nodal metastases, in which ketamine infusion was used successfully to alleviate the pain that was initially not controlled with an incremental dose of opioids. The patient presented with progressive pain in the peri-anal region, rated 8/10 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS), following which she was treated with escalating doses of intravenous (IV) fentanyl, but with little to no relief. In view of the patient's opioid-resistant pain, she was started on a low-dose ketamine IV infusion (50 mg in 50 ml of 0.9% NS) as "burst therapy," at infusion rates of 0.02 mg/kg/hr-0.08 mg/kg/hr, with adequate pain relief occurring at 0.08 mg/kg/hr. Literature suggests weight-based dosing of ketamine ranging from 0.06 mg/kg/hr to 0.8 mg/kg/hr was previously used to achieve satisfactory results. In this patient, even lower doses were effectively used to achieve optimum long-term analgesia, cause an upliftment in the patient's overall mood and quality of life, and cause a significant reduction in opioid usage. However, further research is required to assess the efficacy of ketamine at such doses and its effect on opioid consumption. This case report will promote further study regarding optimum IV ketamine dosing and administration in the management of opioid-refractory pain in cancer patients, especially in the Indian population.

Dextrose Prolotherapy to Treat Pain, Improve Activities of Daily Living, and Improve Quality of Life in an Ewing's Sarcoma Patient Following Radiation and Chemotherapy Treatment.

Advances in the treatment and survival of Ewing's sarcoma patients create a need to treat underlying symptoms that limit activities of daily living and quality of life. This case describes the treatment of pain in a 25-year-old female pediatric nurse with Ewing's sarcoma of the pelvis that was in remission following radiation and chemotherapy. She reported medication side effects and limitations in her activities of daily living and quality of life with the chronic use of topical and oral pain medications. A dextrose prolotherapy approach was used to treat her pain, which allowed her to discontinue her pain medication regimen, resulting in an improvement in her activities of daily living and quality of life. The improvement was sustained at the three-year follow-up after the last procedure.

Successful Treatment of Refractory Cancer Pain and Depression with Continuous Intrathecal Administration of Dexmedetomidine and Morphine: A Case Report.

Patients who have refractory cancer pain suffer both physically and psychologically. Cancer pain management has improved over the past few decades. However, the treatment of refractory cancer pain is still challenging all over the world. Intraspinal analgesia has become an effective strategy to treat refractory pain in patients with cancer. In this report, we present a patient receiving a large dose of intrathecal opioids for refractory cancer pain, and who is also afflicted with pain-induced depression. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) was used as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen that successfully alleviated both the patient's pain and depression. An intrathecal infusion of DEX may serve as an adjuvant drug in the treatment of cancer pain and pain-related depression.