Can proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction replace total gastrectomy? a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.

BACKGROUND: According to the 5th edition of the Japanese Guidelines for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer, proximal gastrectomy is recommended for patients with early upper gastric cancer who can retain the distal half of the residual stomach after R0 resection. However, a large number of recent clinical studies suggest that surgical indications for proximal gastrectomy in the guidelines may be too narrow. Therefore, this meta-analysis included patients with early and advanced gastric cancer and compared short- and long-term postoperative outcomes between the two groups. At the same time, we only had high-quality clinical studies such as propensity score-matched studies and randomized controlled trials, which made our research more authentic and credible. METHODS: Data were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library up to June 2023, and included treatment outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The primary results were Early-phase complications(Anastomotic leakage, Anastomotic bleeding, Abdominal abscess, Abdominal infection, Pulmonary infection, Incision infection, Intestinal obstruction, Dumping syndrome, Pancreatic fistula), Late-phase complications(Intestinal obstruction, Anastomosis stricture, Dumping syndrome, Reoperation, Internal hernia, Incidence of endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux), Serious complications (≥ Grade III C-D score), Quality of life[Gastroesophageal reflux symptom evaluation (Visick score)(≥ III), Los Angeles classification(C or D)], Nutritional status(Hemoglobin, Receipt of vitamin B12 supplementation), Oncologic Outcomes(The 5-year overall survival rates). Secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes (Operative time, Estimated blood loss, Postoperative hospital stay, Number of harvested lymph nodes, Gas-passing, Postoperative mortality).The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle‒Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: After screening, 11 studies were finally included, including 1154 patients. Results from the combined literature showed that total gastrectomy had a significant advantage over proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in mean operating time (MD = 4.92, 95% CI: 0.22∼9.61 P = 0.04). However, meta-analysis results showed that Hemoglobin (MD = 7.12, 95% CI:2.40∼11.84, P = 0.003) and Receipt of vitamin B12 supplementation (OR = 0.12, 95% CI:0.05∼0.26, P < 0.00001) in the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction group were better than those in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction group. There is no significant difference between the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction group in Early-phase complications(OR = 1.14,95% CI:0.79∼1.64, P = 0.50), Late-phase complications(OR = 1.37,95% CI:0.78∼2.39, P = 0.27), Gastroesophageal reflux symptom evaluation (Visick score)(≥ III)(OR = 0.94,95% CI:0.14∼1.07 P = 0.07), Los Angeles classification(C or D)(OR = 0.33,95% CI:0.01∼8.21, P = 0.50), the 5-year overall survival rates (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.83 ~ 1.23, P = 0.89). CONCLUSION: Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract anastomosis is a safe and feasible treatment for upper gastric carcinoma. However, the operating time was slightly longer in the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract group compared to the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group. The two groups were comparable to the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group in terms of serious complications (≥ Grade III C-D score), early-phase complications, late-phase complications, and quality of life. Although the scope of proximal gastrectomy is smaller than that of total gastrectomy, it does not affect the 5-year survival rate, indicating good tumor outcomes for patients. Compared to total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group, proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction had higher hemoglobin levels, lower probability of vitamin B12 supplementation, and better long-term efficacy. In conclusion, proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction is considered one of the more rational surgical approaches for upper gastric cancer.

Distal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction for refractory reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis reconstruction.

Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease can develop after proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy. We introduce a new method that combines distal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction to treat refractory reflux esophagitis in patients who have undergone proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis reconstruction. This novel method may be useful not only for alleviating the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease but also for preventing future esophageal malignancies arising from long-term reflux esophagitis.

To cut or not to cut? A prospective randomized controlled trial on short-term outcomes of the uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomoses have been widely used in distal gastrectomy, while the incidence of Roux stasis syndrome remains common. Uncut R-Y anastomosis maintains the neuromuscular continuity, thus avoiding the ectopic pacemaker of the Roux limb and reducing the occurrence of Roux stasis. However, retrospective studies of Uncut R-Y anastomosis remain scarce and randomized controlled trials have not been reported. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the surgical safety, nutritional status, and postoperative quality of life (QOL) between uncut and classic Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction patients. Patients with Stage I gastric cancer were randomly enrolled and underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy followed by uncut or classic R-Y reconstruction. Body mass index and blood test were used to evaluate the nutritional status. QOL was evaluated using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire (STO22) and laboratory examinations at postoperative month (POM) 3, 6, 9, and 12. Computed tomography scanning was used to evaluate the skeletal muscle index (SMI) at POM 6 and 12. Endoscopy was performed at POM 12. RESULTS: Operation time, blood loss, time to recovery, complication morbidities, and overall survival were similar between the two groups. Compared with the classic R-Y group, the uncut R-Y group displayed a significantly decreased QOL at POM 9, possibly due to loop recanalization, determined to be occupied 34.2% of the uncut R-Y group. Post-exclusion of recanalization, the QOL was still higher in the classic R-Y group than in the uncut R-Y group, despite their hemoglobin and total protein levels being better than those in the classic R-Y group. Preoperative pre-albumin level and impaired fasting glycemia significantly correlated with the postoperative recanalization. CONCLUSION: We found no significant benefit of uncut over classic R-Y reconstruction which challenges the superiority of the uncut R-Y reconstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02644148.

Functional evaluations comparing Billroth I with a large remnant stomach and Roux en Y with a small remnant stomach following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An investigation including laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: This study compared the pros and cons of two post-distal gastrectomy (DG) reconstruction methods by comparing the patient quality of life and functional dynamics at one year postoperatively. METHODS: We compared functional outcomes between Billroth I following laparoscopic 1/2 DG (L-B1; n = 27) and Roux en Y following laparoscopic 4/5 DG (L-RY; n = 24), including laparoscopic total gastrectomy (L-TG; n = 25), at one year postoperatively. Clinical investigations were performed in each patient, and functional evaluations by the acetaminophen (AAP) absorption test and plasma gastrointestinal hormone measurements were performed in consenting patients in each group (L-B1: n = 10, L-RY: n = 10, L-TG: n = 5). RESULTS: Postoperative/preoperative body weight ratios were significantly higher in the L-B1 and L-RY groups, in descending order than the L-TG group, although the meal intake ratio was not significantly different between the L-B1 and L-RY groups. The incidence of remnant gastritis was significantly higher in the B1 than in the RY group. AAP levels, glucose and glucagon-like peptide 1 were significantly lower in the L-B1 than in the L-RY group. Active ghrelin levels (AGL) were similar between the L-B1 and L-RY groups. CONCLUSIONS: L-B1 maintains gradual intestinal absorption and physiological meal passage and prevents postoperative weight loss. L-RY results in maintenance of the postoperative meal intake via high AGL, equivalent to that in the L-B1 group.

Comparison of the prognosis of four different surgical strategies for proximal gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the long-term prognosis and short-term postoperative complications of different surgical strategies for proximal gastric cancer (PGC). METHODS: We searched for articles published in Embase (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science between January 1, 1990, and February 1, 2021. We screened out the literature comparing different surgical strategies. We then evaluated the long-term and short-term outcome of different surgical strategies using a network meta-analysis, which summarizes the hazard ratio, odds ratio, mean difference, and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between different surgical strategies for 5-year overall survival (OS), anastomotic leakage, or weight loss after 1 year. Compared with total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TG-RY) and proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction (PG-DTR), the proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy (PG-EG) strategy significantly increased the incidence of reflux esophagitis; and the operation time and blood loss of the PG-EG strategy were significantly less than those of the other surgical strategies. The anastomotic stenosis rates of the PG-EG and proximal gastrectomy with jejunum interstitial (PG-JI) strategies were significantly higher than those of TG-RY and PG-DTR; the hemoglobin level after 1 year for the PG-DTR strategy was significantly higher than that of the TG-RY strategy. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive literature research found that different surgical strategies had no significant difference in the long-term survival of PGC, but the incidence of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stenosis after PG-DTR and TG-RY was significantly reduced.

Migrating contractions of the afferent and Roux limbs show peristaltic movement independently of each other in conscious dogs after Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: The Roux-en-Y (RY) procedure is used frequently for surgical reconstruction after gastrectomy. However, a minority of patients suffer a serious motility disorder of the Roux and afferent limb postoperatively. We conducted this study to clarify the association between the motility and peristaltic direction of two limbs in conscious dogs. METHODS: We performed distal gastrectomy on five dogs and implanted seven force transducers on the serosal surfaces of the remnant gastric body and afferent and Roux limbs. We then analyzed the electric signals from these force transducers. RESULTS: Migrating contractions were observed in the two limbs, but not in the gastric remnant body. Migrating contractions in the forward direction propagated independently from the most proximal side in each limb. There was no propagation of contraction across the jejunojejunostomy between the two limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Each proximal part of the Roux and afferent limbs has an independent motility pacemaker in conscious dogs after gastrectomy with RY reconstruction.

Evaluation of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short type double balloon endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a single-center retrospective study of 1,576 procedures.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using balloon-assisted endoscope such as double-balloon endoscope is even effective for patients with surgically altered anatomy. Yet comprehensive studies on complications of ERCP using balloon-assisted endoscope have not been made. We analyzed the characteristics and the causes of complications of ERCP using double-balloon endoscope (DB-ERCP) procedures and aimed to suggest effective managements. METHODS: A total of 1576 procedures of DB-ERCP in 714 patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy in our hospital were evaluated retrospectively using a statistic analysis. RESULTS: The overall complication occurrence rate was 5.8%. By type of complications are perforation 3.2%, mucosal laceration 0.5%, hemorrhage 1.0%, pancreatitis 0.6%, respiratory disorder 0.4%, and others 0.2%. By type of surgical reconstruction methods were Roux-en-Y reconstruction with choledocho-jejunal anastomosis 4.2%, Roux-en-Y reconstruction without choledocho-jejunal anastomosis 6.7%, pancreaticoduodenectomy 4.5%, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy 4.2%, Billroth II gastrectomy (B-II) 11.6%, and other reconstruction method (others) 7.4%. The contributing factors calculated by a multivariate analysis were B-II (odds ratio: 1.864, 95% confidence interval: 1.001-3.471, P = 0.050) and the presence of naïve papilla (odds ratio: 3.268, 95% confidence interval: 1.426-7.490, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: DB-ERCP is a safe method with a total complication rate of 5.8% that could be considered within an acceptable range. The most common complication was the injury of the digestive tract such as perforation. Affecting risk factors for complications were B-II and the presence of naïve papilla. DB-ERCP procedures should be performed carefully of these factors.

Intracorporeal classic circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy during laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: A simple, safe "intraluminal poke technique" for anvil placement.

BACKGROUND: Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is being increasingly performed. However, an optimal procedure to achieve intracorporeal gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy for Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy remains to be established. Compared with the simple and preferable circular-stapled Roux-en-Y reconstruction in open gastrectomy, application of intracorporeal circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy of Roux-en-Y reconstruction during laparoscopic distal gastrectomy have been limited (no report of intracorporeal circular-stapled jejunojejunostomy) because of the difficulties of intracorporeal purse-string suture and anvil placement. To address these problems, a simple and safe intraluminal poke technique of universal surgical concept and procedure was introduced and evaluated. METHODS: Between March 2018 and August 2018, 24 consecutive patients with gastric cancer underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in our hospital. Roux-en-Y reconstruction of intracorporeal circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy with the intraluminal poke technique was performed in all patients. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 203.6±26.2min, both proximal and distal tumor-free margins were achieved in all patients. The time for anvil placement at stomach and intestine was 5.9±1.3min and 3.9±0.7min, respectively. Intracorporeal gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy were successively completed following anvil placement with no any anastomosis-related sutures. There were 5 postoperative complications. Morbidities included pancreas fistula (n=1), stasis (n=2), atelectasis (n=1), pneumonia (n=1). These all patients recovered after conservative treatment. No postoperative anastomosis-related complications, such as anastomotic bleeding and leakage, or stenosis occurred during the median follow-up of 6.5 months. CONCLUSION: The initial results suggest that the technique allowing easy and common anvil placement at stomach and intestine may be a simple, safe, preferable and time-saving procedure to accomplish intracorporeal circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy of Roux-en-Y reconstruction in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy as open surgery.

Duodenal stump reinforcement might reduce both incidence and severity of duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although duodenal stump leakage (DSL) is a relatively rare complication after gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction, it is difficult to treat and can be fatal. We investigated the impact of duodenal stump reinforcement on DSL after laparoscopic gastrectomy with R-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study of 965 patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic distal or total gastrectomy (LDG or LTG) with R-Y reconstruction compared surgical outcomes between two groups, the duodenal stump reinforcement group (reinforcement group) (n = 895) and that without duodenal stump reinforcement (non-reinforcement group) (n = 70). RESULTS: Mean operative duration was significantly longer in the reinforcement than in the non-reinforcement group (LDG; 291 min versus 258 min, p < 0.001, LTG; 325 min versus 285 min, p < 0.001). DSL occurred less frequently in the reinforcement than in the non-reinforcement group (0.67% vs. 5.71%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, non-reinforcement was an independent risk factor for DSL in multiple logistic regression analysis with adjustment for potential confounding factors. Patients with DSL in the non-reinforcement group all required re-operation, while all but one patient with DSL in the reinforcement group recovered with conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: Duodenal stump reinforcement in laparoscopic gastrectomy with R-Y reconstruction may reduce the risk of DSL development and minimize its severity.

Billroth-I reconstruction using an overlap method in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: propensity score matched cohort study of short- and long-term outcomes compared with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Delta-shaped anastomosis is an established procedure for intracorporeal Billroth-I reconstruction (B-I). However, this procedure has several technical and economic problems. The aim of the current study was to present the technique of B-I using an overlap method (overlap B-I), which is a side-to-side intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), and to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of this overlap B-I procedure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 533 patients who underwent LDG with overlap B-I (n = 247) or Roux-en-Y reconstruction (R-Y) (n = 286). Patients with overlap B-I were propensity score matched to patients with R-Y in a 1:1 ratio. Short- and long-term outcomes of the two procedures were compared after matching. RESULTS: In the total cohort, anastomosis-related complications occurred in 2.4% of patients with overlap B-I, and 3.2% of those with R-Y (P = 0.794). Morbidity rate, including anastomosis-related complications, and postoperative course were comparable after overlap B-I performed by qualified versus general surgeons. Of 247 patients with overlap B-I, 169 could be matched. After matching, morbidity rate and postoperative course were comparable between the two procedures. Median operation time was significantly shorter for overlap B-I (205 min) than R-Y (252 min; P < 0.001). The incidence of readmission due to gastrointestinal complications was significantly lesser after overlap B-I (2.4%) compared with R-Y (21.9%; P < 0.001). The main causes of readmission after R-Y were bowel obstruction (7.3%) and gallstones (8.0%). Regarding the development of common bile duct (CBD) stones, 11 patients (3.8%) who underwent R-Y were readmitted due to CBD stones, whereas no patients who underwent B-I developed CBD stones. CONCLUSIONS: Overlap B-I is feasible and safe, even when performed by general surgeons. B-I was superior to R-Y concerning operation time and readmission due to gastrointestinal complications.

The crossover technique for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy following laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a simple and safe technique using a linear stapler and two barbed sutures.

BACKGROUND: Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is preferred over open gastrectomy because it allows safe anastomosis, a small wound, and early bowel recovery. However, esophagojejunostomy (EJS) following laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) remains technically challenging. To popularize LTG, a secure method of reconstruction must be developed. We present a simple and safe technique for intracorporeal EJS following LTG. METHODS: Our modified technique for intracorporeal EJS as a part of Roux-en-Y reconstruction following LTG incorporates an isoperistaltic stapled EJS with closure of the entry hole using two unidirectional barbed sutures. First, a side-to-side isoperistaltic EJS is created between the dorsal and left side of the esophagus and the jejunal arm. Second, the opening for the stapler is closed with a two-layer continuous suture using two 15-cm 3-0 V-Loc suture devices. The full-thickness inner layer closure commences from the sides of the staple lines and progresses toward the center of the enterotomy. During suturing, the remaining thread is utilized to apply tension and lift the enterotomy. Once the full-thickness layer closure is complete at the center of the enterotomy, suturing of the second seromuscular layer is started in the forward direction toward each corner to give a crossover-shaped suturing line. RESULTS: From February 2012 to October 2017, 27 patients with gastric cancer underwent LTG with intracorporeal stapled EJS as a part of Roux-en-Y reconstruction. All procedures were successfully performed without any intra- or postoperative anastomosis-related complications. No conversion to other procedures was required. The mean suturing time was 19.1 ± 9.5 min. The mean postoperative time to tolerating a liquid diet was 3.3 days, and the mean hospital stay was 12.1 days. CONCLUSIONS: We herein report our procedure for intracorporeal EJS using a linear stapler and barbed sutures. This technique is simple and feasible and has acceptable morbidity.

Stenosis after esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-double-stapling technique using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™) in Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the patient's left side following laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The drawback of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with the double-stapling technique (DST) using a transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) following laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is not only the high incidence of stenosis but also the presence of intractable stenosis that is refractory to endoscopic treatments. METHODS: From November 2013 to December 2016, 24 patients with gastric cancer underwent intracorporeal circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-double-stapling technique (hemi-DST) using the OrVil™ in antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the left side of the patient following LTG to prevent twisting of the esophagojejunostomy and lifted jejunum, which might cause intractable stenosis of the esophagojejunostomy. RESULTS: In this patient series, no twisting of the esophagojejunostomy and lifted jejunum was encountered intraoperatively or postoperatively. Two stenoses of the esophagojejunostomy occurred. Because neither was involved with twisting and both were localized at the anastomotic plane, endoscopic treatments including balloon dilation and electrocautery incisional therapy were successful in both cases. There were no patients with intractable stenosis in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-DST using the OrVil™ in antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the left side of the patient can be one option for a circular stapling technique in LTG due to its prevention of intractable stenosis of the esophagojejunostomy that is refractory to endoscopic treatments.

Mortality and postoperative complications after different types of surgical reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy-a systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy/PD is a technically demanding pancreatic resection. Options of surgical reconstruction include (1) the child reconstruction defined as pancreatojejunostomy/PJ followed by hepaticojejunostomy/HJ and the gastrojejunostomy/GJ "the standard/s-Child," (2) the s-child reconstruction with an additional Braun enteroenterostomy "BE-Child," or (3) Isolated-Roux-En-Y-pancreaticojejunostomy "Iso-Roux-En-Y," in which the pancreas anastomosis is reconstructed in a separate loop after the GJ. Yet, the impact of these reconstruction methods on patients' outcome has not been sufficiently compared in a systematic manner. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred-Reporting-Items-for-Systematic-review-and-Meta-Analysis/PRISMA-guidelines by screening Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web-of-Science. Articles meeting predefined criteria were extracted and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were identified comparing BE-Child or Isolated-Roux-En-Y vs. s-Child. Compared to s-Child neither BE-Child (p = 0.43) nor Iso-Roux-En-Y (p = 0.94) displayed an impact on postoperative mortality, whereas BE-Child showed less postoperative complications (p = 0.02). BE-Child (p = 0.15) and Iso-Roux-En-Y (p = 0.61) did not affect postoperative pancreatic fistula/POPF in general, but BE-Child was associated with a decrease of clinically relevant POPF (p = 0.005), clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying/DGE B/C (p = 0.004), bile leaks (p = 0.01), and hospital stay (p = 0.06). BE-Child entailed also an increased operation time (p = 0.0002) with no impact on DGE A/B/C, hemorrhage, surgical site infections and pulmonary complications. CONCLUSION: BE-Child is associated with a decreased risk for postoperative complications, particularly a decreased risk for clinically relevant DGE, POPF, and bile leaks, whereas Iso-Roux-En-Y does not seem to affect the clinical course after PD. Therefore, BE seems to be a valuable surgical method to improve patients' outcome after PD.

Reconstruction method as an independent risk factor for postoperative bone mineral density loss in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: No study has compared the incidence of postoperative bone metabolic disorders between Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstructions after distal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we wished to examine the impact of reconstruction method on postoperative bone mineral density (BMD) loss. METHODS: We investigated a total of 148 consecutive patients who underwent DG with B-I or R-Y reconstruction for stage I GC between 2008 and 2012. We retrospectively assessed the BMD data using computed tomography attenuation values of the first lumbar vertebra after surgery. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis for the whole study series, R-Y reconstruction was identified as an independent risk factor for BMD loss after DG (P < 0.0001; OR = 5.60; 95% CI = 2.38-13.98). Propensity score match analysis was used to overcome bias because of the different covariates for the two groups; even though the 37 patients in the B-I group and the 37 patients in the R-Y group had no significant difference among characteristics, B-I reconstruction was validated to have superiority over R-Y reconstruction for preventing BMD loss in the first 3 years after DG. The cumulative hazard ratio of osteoporosis after gastrectomy was significantly higher in the R-Y group than in the B-I group (P = 0.0427). CONCLUSIONS: Billroth-I reconstruction might be a preferable method for preventing BMD loss after gastrectomy in GC patients.

Laparoscopic revision of Billroth II with Braun anastomosis into Roux-en-Y anatomy in a patient with intestinal malrotation.

INTRODUCTION: Various reconstructions of the gastro-intestinal tract have been described in the past after distal gastrectomy. Among these, a Billroth II (BII) anastomosis can be performed with the addition of the Omega entero-enterostomy that may theoretically reduce the alkaline reflux. Given the significant complications associated with this procedure such as biliary reflux, marginal ulceration, and afferent loop syndrome, a revision into a Roux-en-Y anatomy is generally recommended. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A 73-year-old healthy male was referred to our foregut surgery service for treatment of severe biliary gastritis. The patient previously underwent an open distal gastrectomy with a BII reconstruction followed by a Braun-type entero-enterostomy 6 months later. His main complaint was worsening daily biliary reflux with constant regurgitations, which were non-responsive to medical treatment. The preoperative endoscopy confirmed the diagnosis of severe biliary gastritis secondary to alkaline reflux. The distance between the gastro-jejunostomy and the Braun anastomosis was also measured with a pediatric colonoscope and the length of the efferent limb was estimated to be 80 cm. RESULTS: Identification of the afferent and efferent limb was complicated by the patient's incomplete intestinal malrotation with the angle of Treitz being present in the right hypochondrium. Intra-operative gastroscopy enabled visualization of the jejuno-jejunostomy and ensured correct interpretation of the anatomy. Subsequently, resection of the afferent limb completed the revision into a Roux-en-Y anatomy. The patient recovered well after the surgery and was discharged home on post-operative day 2. At 6 months follow-up, the patient's reflux symptoms have completely disappeared. CONCLUSION: BII reconstruction with or without Braun entero-enterostomy is a classic historical option following distal gastrectomy. Surgical revision of a BII into a Roux-en-Y anatomy is a good solution for severe biliary reflux and other long-term complications. Intra-operative endoscopy is a great adjunct to laparoscopic exploration in case of complex surgical procedures.

Utility of newly developed short-type double-balloon endoscopy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in postoperative patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The utility of conventional short-type double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) for pancreatobiliary disease in patients with postoperative anatomy had been widely acknowledged and accepted. However, some technical difficulties yet remained. In an attempt to solve these problems, the new short-type DBE (N-short DBE) was uniquely designed for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in postoperative patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of N-short DBE for ERC in postoperative patients. METHODS: From August 2015 to April 2016, ERC using N-short DBE (DB-ERC) was performed in 100 postoperative patients (112 procedures). We retrospectively studied the success rate of reaching the blind end, the median time to reach the blind end, the diagnostic success rate, the therapeutic success rate, the median time to complete ERC-related interventions, the overall success rate, the median time to complete DB-ERC, and adverse events. RESULTS: The success rate of reaching the blind end was 99.1%. The median time to reach the blind end was 10 min (interquartile range [IQR], 6-19 min). The diagnostic success rate was 98.2%. The therapeutic success rate was 100%. The median time to complete ERC-related interventions was 36 min (IQR, 22-62 min). The overall DB-ERC success rate was 97.3%. The median time to complete DB-ERC was 54 min (IQR, 37-73 min). The occurrence of adverse events was 2.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The N-short DBE for ERC in postoperative patients is useful and safe. DB-ERC is promising therapeutic modality in such patients and should be selected as the first-line policy.

Double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for Roux-en-Y reconstruction patients with papilla of Vater or bilioenteric anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE: Roux-en-Y reconstructions can be divided into intact papilla of Vater and bilioenteric anastomosis (BEA) with respect to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERC (DBE-ERC) may produce different results between the two populations but lacks studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis undergoing 73 procedures of DBE-ERC were enrolled between July 2007 and August 2013. There were 14 patients with intact papilla of Vater (group A) and 33 patients with BEA (group B). The effectiveness of DBE-ERC, including data of reaching the blind end, performance of ERC, results of endoscopic therapies, and follow-up were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: For reaching the blind end, the success rate was not different between the groups (85.7% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.7), but the mean procedure time was significantly shorter for group A (28 min vs. 52 min, p = 0.01). For ERC, the success rate was not different between the groups (91.7% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.53), but the mean procedure time was significantly longer for group A (28.4 min vs. 4 min, p < 0.001). All endoscopic therapies could be successfully performed in both groups. No group A patients and five (23.8%) group B patients developed recurrent biliary stricture/stones requiring interventions during a mean follow-up period of 26.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: DBE-ERC was effective for both populations with biliary disorders. Reaching the blind end was more difficult but ERC was easier for patients with BEA in terms of procedure time rather than success rates.

Reconstruction method as an independent risk factor for the postoperative decrease in hemoglobin in stage I gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: No study has compared the incidence of postoperative anemia between two reconstruction methods, Billroth-I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstructions, after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we wished to examine the postoperative decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) as an indicator of iron-deficiency anemia. METHODS: We investigated a total of 119 consecutive patients who underwent distal gastrectomy with B-I or R-Y reconstruction for Stage I GC between 2006 and 2012. We retrospectively assessed the clinical data, including Hb results, of the first 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Compared with B-I reconstruction, R-Y reconstruction was performed more frequently in older patients (P = 0.017), and it was associated with a longer surgical duration (P < 0.001), a larger amount of blood loss (P = 0.031), a higher incidence of stasis (P = 0.044), and a greater decrease in Hb for the first 2 years after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified that R-Y reconstruction was the only risk factor (P = 0.0487; odds ratio = 2.755; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-7.91) for a decrease in Hb, independent of age, tumor location, postoperative complications, and other factors. In addition, an age ≥ 75 was identified as an independent risk factor for a decrease in Hb, particularly for patients underwent R-Y reconstruction (P = 0.033; odds ratio = 6.99; 95% confidence interval = 1.15-68.3) according to the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Billroth-I reconstruction might be preferable for the purpose of preventing a decrease in Hb in stage I GC patients, particularly in older patients.

Technique of Roux-en-Y reconstruction using overlap method after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 100 consecutively successful cases.

BACKGROUND: We have established a standard procedure for Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction in laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) using esophagojejunostomy by the overlap method (OL). We report on our RY reconstruction technique and special approaches, and evaluate the usefulness of our reconstruction method based on the surgical results of 100 patients we have experienced to date. METHODS: We performed LTG in 100 patients with gastric cancer. After total gastrectomy using five ports, the resected stomach was extracted through a small laparotomy. Through that, we performed sacrifice of the jejunum, Y limb anastomosis, creation of the lifted jejunum. As the OL, a side-to-side anastomosis of the lifted jejunum to the esophageal stump was laparoscopically performed using a linear stapler in an isoperistaltic direction, and the entry hole was closed with full-thickness suturing. The lifted jejunum was fixed with suture to the duodenal stump at a location where the esophagojejunostomy site was made linear, and the duodenal stump was buried. The mesenteric gap was laparoscopically closed with suture. RESULTS: The median operative time in 100 patients undergoing LTG was 385 min, the median blood loss was 65 mL, and the median time required for the OL was 32 min. The mean hospitalization period was 10 days, and postoperative complications included bleeding requiring reoperation in one patient; other complications such as pancreatic fistula in five patients (5 %) were treated conservatively. No complication associated with anastomosis occurred. CONCLUSION: In RY reconstruction using the OL, there were no complications associated with the anastomosis site in 100 consecutive patients, such as anastomotic leak or stenosis, indicating that it is a very useful and safe reconstruction method.