Mutation of the SWI/SNF complex component Smarce1 decreases nucleosome stability in embryonic stem cells and impairs differentiation.

The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex consists of more than ten component proteins that form a large protein complex of >1 MDa. The catalytic proteins Smarca4 or Smarca2 work in concert with the component proteins to form a chromatin platform suitable for transcriptional regulation. However, the mechanism by which each component protein works synergistically with the catalytic proteins remains largely unknown. Here, we report on the function of Smarce1, a component of the SWI/SNF complex, through the phenotypic analysis of homozygous mutant embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Disruption of Smarce1 induced the dissociation of other complex components from the SWI/SNF complex. Histone binding to DNA was loosened in homozygous mutant ESCs, indicating that disruption of Smarce1 decreased nucleosome stability. Sucrose gradient sedimentation analysis suggested that there was an ectopic genomic distribution of the SWI/SNF complex upon disruption of Smarce1, accounting for the misregulation of chromatin conformations. Unstable nucleosomes remained during ESC differentiation, impairing the heterochromatin formation that is characteristic of the differentiation process. These results suggest that Smarce1 guides the SWI/SNF complex to the appropriate genomic regions to generate chromatin structures adequate for transcriptional regulation.

Evolving concepts in meningioma management in the era of genomics.

Meningioma is the most common type of primary brain tumor. Surgical resection followed by surveillance is the first-line treatment for the majority of symptomatic meningiomas; however, recent advances in molecular sequencing, DNA methylation, proteomics, and single-cell sequencing provide insights into further characterizing this heterogeneous group of tumors with a wide range of prognoses. A subset of these tumors are highly aggressive and cause severe morbidity and mortality. Therefore, identifying those individuals with a poor prognosis and intervening are critical. This review aims to help readers interpret the molecular profiling of meningiomas to identify patients with worse prognoses and guide the management and strategy for surveillance.

Assembly and interaction of core subunits of BAF complexes and crystal study of the SMARCC1/SMARCE1 binary complex.

The multi-subunit ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factor SWI/SNF complex is a fundamental regulator of gene transcription. The SWI/SNF complex in mammals, also called the BAF complex, consists of 9-12 subunits. Genomic functional studies have found that 20%-25% of human cancers are caused by mutations in genes encoding this complex. For the assembly of the BAF complex, BAF47 (SMARCB1), BAF57 (SMARCE1), BAF155 (SMARCC1)/BAF170 (SMARCC2), and BAF60 A/B/C (SMARCD1/2/3) form a core complex. However, the assembly mechanism of the BAF core subunit remains unclear. In this study, the assembly mechanism and structure of this complex and the interactions between its subunits were investigated. We co-expressed SMARCC1(447-966)/SMARCD1(129-471), SMARCC1(447-966)/SMARCE1(210-284) and SMARCC1(862-966)/SMARCE1(210-284) binary complex, SMARCC1(862-966)/SMARCD1(129-471)/SMARCE1(210-284) ternary complex SMARCC1(353-966)/SAMRCD1(129-471)/SMARCB1(110-385)/SAMRCE1(210-284) tetrameric complexes, and obtained crystals of the SMARCC1(862-966)/SMARCE1(210-284) and SMARCC1(883-966)/SMARCE1(210-284) binary complex，and the SMARCC1(883-966)/SMARCE1(210-284) crystal received a set of diffraction data of 3.2 Å. Our experimental results demonstrate the assembly mechanism between the core subunit quaternary complexes of the BAF complex and the interacting amino acid fragment regions and the SMARCC1/SMARCE1 optimal amino acid fragment binary complex crystals. Our study provides a theoretical basis for the development of cancer and related drug research based on protein structure.

Clear cell meningiomas are defined by a highly distinct DNA methylation profile and mutations in SMARCE1.

Clear cell meningioma represents an uncommon variant of meningioma that typically affects children and young adults. Although an enrichment of loss-of-function mutations in the SMARCE1 gene has been reported for this subtype, comprehensive molecular investigations are lacking. Here we describe a molecularly distinct subset of tumors (n = 31), initially identified through genome-wide DNA methylation screening among a cohort of 3093 meningiomas, of which most were diagnosed histologically as clear cell meningioma. This cohort was further supplemented by an additional 11 histologically diagnosed clear cell meningiomas for analysis (n = 42). Targeted DNA sequencing revealed SMARCE1 mutations in 33/34 analyzed samples, accompanied by a nuclear loss of expression determined via immunohistochemistry and a decreased SMARCE1 transcript expression in the tumor cells. Analysis of time to progression or recurrence of patients within the clear cell meningioma group (n = 14) in comparison to those with meningioma WHO grade 2 (n = 220) revealed a similar outcome and support the assignment of WHO grade 2 to these tumors. Our findings indicate the existence of a highly distinct epigenetic signature of clear cell meningiomas, separate from all other variants of meningiomas, with recurrent mutations in the SMARCE1 gene. This suggests that these tumors may arise from a different precursor cell population than the broad spectrum of the other meningioma subtypes.

The importance of genetic counseling and screening for people with pathogenic SMARCE1 variants: A family study.

Clear cell meningioma (CCM) is a rare variant of meningioma. In recent years, an association between cranial and spinal CCMs and germline loss of function mutations in the SMARCE1 gene (SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex subunit gene) has been discovered. We report a family with an incidental large spinal clear cell meningioma in a young adult following reflex screening for a germline loss of function pathogenic variant (PV) in the SMARCE1 gene. The index patient's mother and maternal grandfather were both also tested positive presymptomatically for SMARCE1. His mother developed intracranial and spinal meningiomas and his maternal grandfather developed a spinal CCM 4 years following a clear spinal MRI scan which required surgical excision. In this report we particularly emphasize the importance of genetic counseling and screening in siblings, parents and offspring of patients who are diagnosed with intracranial or spinal CCM in the context of SMARCE1 PVs. We recommend brain and spine Imaging screening of asymptomatic SMARCE1 PV carriers at least every 3 years, even if the baseline scan did not show any tumors.

An update on the CNS manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 2.

Neurofibromatosis type II (NF2) is a tumor predisposition syndrome characterized by the development of distinctive nervous system lesions. NF2 results from loss-of-function alterations in the NF2 gene on chromosome 22, with resultant dysfunction of its protein product merlin. NF2 is most commonly associated with the development of bilateral vestibular schwannomas; however, patients also have a predisposition to development of other tumors including meningiomas, ependymomas, and peripheral, spinal, and cranial nerve schwannomas. Patients may also develop other characteristic manifestations such as ocular lesions, neuropathies, meningioangiomatosis, and glial hamartia. NF2 has a highly variable clinical course, with some patients exhibiting a severe phenotype and development of multiple tumors at an early age, while others may be nearly asymptomatic throughout their lifetime. Despite the high morbidity associated with NF2 in severe cases, management of NF2-associated lesions primarily consists of surgical resection and treatment of symptoms, and there are currently no FDA-approved systemic therapies that address the underlying biology of the syndrome. Refinements to the diagnostic criteria of NF2 have been proposed over time due to increasing understanding of clinical and molecular data. Large-population studies have demonstrated that some features such as the development of gliomas and neurofibromas, currently included as diagnostic criteria, may require further clarification and modification. Meanwhile, burgeoning insights into the molecular biology of NF2 have shed light on the etiology and highly variable severity of the disease and suggested numerous putative molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Here, we review the clinicopathologic features of NF2, current understanding of the molecular biology of NF2, particularly with regard to central nervous system lesions, ongoing therapeutic studies, and avenues for further research.

SMARCE1 is required for the invasive progression of in situ cancers.

Advances in mammography have sparked an exponential increase in the detection of early-stage breast lesions, most commonly ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). More than 50% of DCIS lesions are benign and will remain indolent, never progressing to invasive cancers. However, the factors that promote DCIS invasion remain poorly understood. Here, we show that SMARCE1 is required for the invasive progression of DCIS and other early-stage tumors. We show that SMARCE1 drives invasion by regulating the expression of secreted proteases that degrade basement membrane, an ECM barrier surrounding all epithelial tissues. In functional studies, SMARCE1 promotes invasion of in situ cancers growing within primary human mammary tissues and is also required for metastasis in vivo. Mechanistically, SMARCE1 drives invasion by forming a SWI/SNF-independent complex with the transcription factor ILF3. In patients diagnosed with early-stage cancers, SMARCE1 expression is a strong predictor of eventual relapse and metastasis. Collectively, these findings establish SMARCE1 as a key driver of invasive progression in early-stage tumors.

Pediatric clear cell meningioma involving the middle cranial fossa in the context of NF2 and SMARCE1 mutations.

Meningiomas are an uncommon entity in children and adolescents. <30 cases of pediatric clear cell meningioma (CCM), a World Health Organization (WHO) Grade II tumor, have been reported in the literature. These tumors are more likely to recur than the more common WHO Grade I meningiomas, especially with incomplete surgical resection. CCMs are most commonly found in the spine and posterior cranial fossa. Recently, SMARCE1 mutations have been linked to the development of CCM. To evaluate the progression of pediatric CCM in the context of emerging genetic knowledge, we reviewed all 45 cases of CCM at our institution for a 23 year period (1997-2019) to identify pediatric cases. Forty-four of the tumors arose in adults from age 34-81 years. The one pediatric case originally presented at age 4 years; the patient was found to have a CCM in the left cavernous sinus projecting into the posterior fossa, associated with a novel germline SMARCE1 mutation and somatic NF1 and DMD mutations. After two years, the patient had a recurrence of the tumor and underwent a second resection. This is the 5th reported case of CCM in the middle cranial fossa, and the only recurrent case, as well as the only reported case of recurrent pediatric CCM associated with a germline SMARCE1 mutation. Further study of the natural history of tumors associated with germline SMARCE1 loss could potentially inform prognosis.

[The role of SMARCE1 in the diagnosis of clear cell meningioma].

Objective: To analyze the expression of SMARCE1 in clear cell meningioma (CCM), and evaluate the role of SMARCE1 in the differential diagnosis in morphologically similar diseases. Methods: Thirteen samples/11 cases of CCMs were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University and Thaihe Hospital of Hubei Province from January 2000 to December 2018, as well as 17 cases of meningiomas with clear-cell-like morphology, 782 cases of other types of meningiomas and other intracranial tumors with clear-like morphology. A tissue microarray was made using these cases, on which immunohistochemical/histochemical staining of SMARCE1, SSTR2, EMA, Ki-67, p53, PAS and D-PAS were performed. Result: The tumor cells of CCM had sheet-like architecture, without typical whorl formation.The CCM had round to polygonal cells, with clear, glycogen-rich cytoplasm and prominent blocky perivascular and interstitial collagen. The immunohistochemistry staining showed that none of the CCMs expressed SMARCE1(0/13).However, all of the other types of lesions, including meningioma(782/782), meningiomas with clear-like morphology(17/17), intracranial metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma(10/10), haemangioblastoma(10/10), central neurocytoma(10/10), oligodendroglioma(10/10), ependymoma(13/13), lioblastoma(42/42), and solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma(35/35) showed positive nuclear staining of SMARCE1. Ki-67 index were 1%-5%, and p53 positive-rate were 0-40% in CCMs. PAS stain showed cytoplasmic granular positive and D-PAS were negative in all CCMs and meningiomas with clear-like morphology. Conclusion: SMARCE1 is a useful marker for the diagnosis of CCM and its mimickers.

SMARCE1 mutation screening in classification of clear cell meningiomas.

AIMS: Clear cell meningioma (CCM) is a rare subtype of meningioma and shows not only unusual histology, but also unique clinical features. Recently, SMARCE1 mutations have been shown to cause spinal and cranial CCMs. We present 12 cases which were diagnosed with CCM in a single institution between 1997 and 2014, and investigate their SMARCE1 mutation status. METHODS AND RESULTS: To investigate the SMARCE1 mutation status of these tumours, we used a combination of Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis and also performed SMARCE1 immunohistochemical staining. We found both SMARCE1 mutational hits, including novel SMARCE1 mutations, in six of eight tested patients. Immunohistochemical analysis showed loss of SMARCE1 protein staining in all but two cases. Two individuals who were diagnosed originally with CCM were negative for SMARCE1 mutations, but tested positive for NF2 mutations. As a result, these two tumours were re-analysed and eventually reclassified, as a microcystic and a mixed pattern of meningothelial meningioma with focal clear cell areas, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results expand the spectrum of pathogenic variants in SMARCE1 and show that mutation screening can help to facilitate meningioma classification. This may have implications for prognosis and future clinical management of patients, as CCMs are classed as grade II tumours, while microcystic and meningothelial meningiomas are classed as grade I.

A heritable form of SMARCE1-related meningiomas with important implications for follow-up and family screening.

Childhood meningiomas are rare. Recently, a new hereditary tumor predisposition syndrome has been discovered, resulting in an increased risk for spinal and intracranial clear cell meningiomas (CCMs) in young patients. Heterozygous loss-of-function germline mutations in the SMARCE1 gene are causative, giving rise to an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. We report on an extended family with a pediatric CCM patient and an adult CCM patient and several asymptomatic relatives carrying a germline SMARCE1 mutation, and discuss difficulties in genetic counseling for this heritable condition. Because of the few reported cases so far, the lifetime risk of developing meningiomas for SMARCE1 mutation carriers is unclear and the complete tumor spectrum is unknown. There is no surveillance guideline for asymptomatic carriers nor a long-term follow-up recommendation for SMARCE1-related CCM patients as yet. Until more information is available about the penetrance and tumor spectrum of the condition, we propose the following screening advice for asymptomatic SMARCE1 mutation carriers: neurological examination and MRI of the brain and spine, yearly from diagnosis until the age of 18 and once every 3 years thereafter, or in between if there are clinical symptoms. This advice can also be used for long-term patient follow-up. More data is needed to optimize this proposed screening advice.

SMARCE1 regulates metastatic potential of breast cancer cells through the HIF1A/PTK2 pathway.

BACKGROUND: While aberrant activation of the chromatin-remodeling SWI/SNF complexes has been associated with cancer development and progression, the role of each subunit in tumor cells is poorly defined. This study is aimed to characterize the role of SMARCE1/BAF57 in regulating metastasis of breast cancer cells. METHODS: Genetic approaches and chemical inhibitors were used to manipulate the activities of SMARCE1 and its downstream targets in multiple breast cancer cell lines. Xenograft mouse models were used to analyze the role of SMARCE1 in lung metastasis in vivo. Nonadherent culture conditions were used to elucidate the role of SMARCE1 in regulating anoikis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting assays were designed to dissect the mechanism of action of SMARCE1. Public databases were used to investigate the relationship between SMARCE1 deregulation and breast cancer prognosis. RESULTS: SMARCE1 knockdown reduced lung metastasis of breast cancer cells and sensitized tumor cells to anoikis. In response to loss of attachment, SMARCE1 interacted with and potentiated transcriptional activity of HIF1A, resulting in rapid PTK2 activation. Both HIF1A and PTK2 were indispensable for SMARCE1-mediated protection against anoikis by promoting activation of ERK and AKT pathways while suppressing the expression of pro-apoptotic BIM protein. Expression data analysis of a large cohort of human breast tumors revealed that high expression of SMARCE1 or PTK2 is associated with poor prognosis and tumor relapse, and PTK2 expression is positively correlated with SMARCE1 expression in basal-like and luminal B subtypes of breast tumors. CONCLUSIONS: SMARCE1 plays an essential role in breast cancer metastasis by protecting cells against anoikis through the HIF1A/PTK2 pathway. SMARCE1-mediated PTK2 activation likely plays a key role in promoting metastasis of basal-like and luminal B subtype of breast tumors.

SMARCE1, a rare cause of Coffin-Siris Syndrome: Clinical description of three additional cases.

Coffin-Siris syndrome (CSS, MIM 135900), is a well-described, multiple congenital anomaly syndrome characterized by coarse facial features, hypertrichosis, sparse scalp hair, and hypo/aplastic digital nails and phalanges, typically of the 5th digits. Mutations in the BAF (SWI/SNF)-complex subunits (SMARCA4, SMARCE1, SMARCB1, SMARCA2, ARID1B, and ARID1A) have been shown to cause not only CSS, but also related disorders including Nicolaides-Baraitser (MIM 601358) syndrome and ARID1B-intellectual disability syndrome (MIM 614562). At least 200 individuals with CSS have been found to have a mutation in the BAF pathway. However, to date, only three individuals with CSS have been reported to have pathogenic variants in SMARCE1. We report here three additional individuals with clinical features consistent with CSS and alterations in SMARCE1, one of which is novel. The probands all exhibited dysmorphic facial features, moderate developmental and cognitive delay, poor growth, and hypoplastic digital nails/phalanges, including digits not typically affected in the other genes associated with CSS. Two of the three probands had a variety of different organ system anomalies, including cardiac disease, genitourinary abnormalities, feeding difficulties, and vision abnormalities. The 3rd proband has not had further investigative studies. Although an increasing number of individuals are being diagnosed with disorders in the BAF pathway, SMARCE1 is the least common of these genes. This report doubles the number of probands with these mutations, and allows for better phenotypic information of this rare syndrome. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Germline SMARCE1 mutations predispose to both spinal and cranial clear cell meningiomas.

We recently reported SMARCE1 mutations as a cause of spinal clear cell meningiomas. Here, we have identified five further cases with non-NF2 spinal meningiomas and six with non-NF2 cranial meningiomas. Three of the spinal cases and three of the cranial cases were clear cell tumours. We screened them for SMARCE1 mutations and investigated copy number changes in all point mutation-negative samples. We identified two novel mutations in individuals with spinal clear cell meningiomas and three mutations in individuals with cranial clear cell meningiomas. Copy number analysis identified a large deletion of the 5' end of SMARCE1 in two unrelated probands with spinal clear cell meningiomas. Testing of affected and unaffected relatives of one of these individuals identified the same deletion in two affected female siblings and their unaffected father, providing further evidence of incomplete penetrance of meningioma disease in males. In addition, we found loss of SMARCE1 protein in three of 10 paraffin-embedded cranial clear cell meningiomas. Together, these results demonstrate that loss of SMARCE1 is relevant to cranial as well as spinal meningiomas. Our study broadens the spectrum of mutations in the SMARCE1 gene and expands the phenotype to include cranial clear cell meningiomas.

The genetic basis of intradural spinal tumors and its impact on clinical treatment.

Genetic alterations in the cells of intradural spinal tumors can have a significant impact on the treatment options, counseling, and prognosis for patients. Although surgery is the primary therapy for most intradural tumors, radiochemothera-peutic modalities and targeted interventions play an ever-evolving role in treating aggressive cancers and in addressing cancer recurrence in long-term survivors. Recent studies have helped delineate specific genetic and molecular differences between intradural spinal tumors and their intracranial counterparts and have also identified significant variation in therapeutic effects on these tumors. This review discusses the genetic and molecular alterations in the most common intradural spinal tumors in both adult and pediatrie patients, including nerve sheath tumors (that is, neurofibroma and schwannoma), meningioma, ependymoma, astrocytoma (that is, low-grade glioma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and glioblastoma), hemangioblastoma, and medulloblastoma. It also examines the genetics of metastatic tumors to the spinal cord, arising either from the CNS or from systemic sources. Importantly, the impact of this knowledge on therapeutic options and its application to clinical practice are discussed.

Genotype-phenotype correlation of Coffin-Siris syndrome caused by mutations in SMARCB1, SMARCA4, SMARCE1, and ARID1A.

Coffin-Siris syndrome (CSS) is a rare congenital malformation syndrome, recently found to be caused by mutations in several genes encoding components of the BAF complex. To date, 109 patients have been reported with their mutations: SMARCB1 (12%), SMARCA4 (11%), SMARCE1 (2%), ARID1A (7%), ARID1B (65%), and PHF6 (2%). We review genotype-phenotype correlation of all previously reported patients with mutations in SMARCB1, SMARCA4, SMARCE1, and ARID1A through reassessment of their clinical and molecular findings. Cardinal features of CSS included variable degrees of intellectual disability (ID) predominantly affecting speech, sucking/feeding difficulty, and craniofacial (thick eyebrows, long eyelashes), digital (hypoplastic 5th fingers or toes, hypoplastic 5th fingernails or toenails), and other characteristics (hypertrichosis). In addition, patients with SMARCB1 mutations had severe neurodevelopmental deficits including severe ID, seizures, CNS structural abnormalities, and no expressive words as well as scoliosis. Especially, those with a recurrent mutation "p.Lys364del" represented strikingly similar phenotypes including characteristic facial coarseness. Patients with SMARCA4 mutations had less coarse craniofacial appearances and behavioral abnormalities. Patients with SMARCE1 mutations had a wide spectrum of manifestations from severe to moderate ID. Patients with ARID1A also had a wide spectrum of manifestations from severe ID and serous internal complications that could result in early death to mild ID. Mutations in SMARCB1, SMARCA4, and SMARCE1 are expected to exert dominant-negative or gain-of-function effects, whereas those in ARID1A are expected to exert loss-of-function effects.

Lumbar clear cell meningioma mimicking schwannoma 7 years after resection of the same type of intracranial tumor: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Meningioma is the second most common intradural extramedullary tumor, following schwannoma. Meningioma is primarily categorized as benign World Health Organization grade 1, but clear cell meningioma is grade 2 of the intermediate malignant category. Clear cell meningiomas are rare, accounting for less than 1% of all meningioma tumors. There is no previous report of multiple intraspinal clear cell meningiomas without dural attachment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 27-year-old Asian male patient presented with lower right extremity pain, and had undergone tumor resection for intracranial clear cell meningioma 7 years previously, with re-resection and radiotherapy for local tumor recurrence at our hospital's department of neurosurgery being carried out 4 years previously. No recurrence was observed since then. Preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging showed two tumors at the L1 and L4 levels, both mimicking schwannoma with well-defined margins, no dural tail sign and homogeneous internal contrast. Intraoperative findings on tumor resection showed two tumors contiguous with the right L2 and L5 roots, which were not attached to the dura mater, similar to a schwannoma. After gross total resection, the postoperative pathology revealed no nuclear SMARCE1 antibody staining. The patient was diagnosed with clear cell meningioma. The patient's postoperative course went well, with no symptoms of nerve dropout and no recurrence 2 years after surgery. In this case, both lumbar lesions were well demarcated and spherical in shape, occurring with single roots. Tumor characteristics suggested a primary rather than a metastatic lesion. Clear cell meningioma is characterized by a SMARCE1 mutation and is different from other types of meningiomas. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of multiple intraspinal clear cell meningiomas without dural attachment at the lumbar spine after resection of intracranial clear cell meningioma. We speculate that the two tumors were de novo lesions on the basis of the features of the tumors, although they were detected 7 years after the resection of intracranial clear cell meningioma.

Coffin-Siris syndrome and the BAF complex: genotype-phenotype study in 63 patients.

De novo germline variants in several components of the SWI/SNF-like BAF complex can cause Coffin-Siris syndrome (CSS), Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome (NCBRS), and nonsyndromic intellectual disability. We screened 63 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CSS for these genes (ARID1A, ARID1B, SMARCA2, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, and SMARCE1) and identified pathogenic variants in 45 (71%) patients. We found a high proportion of variants in ARID1B (68%). All four pathogenic variants in ARID1A appeared to be mosaic. By using all variants from the Exome Variant Server as test data, we were able to classify variants in ARID1A, ARID1B, and SMARCB1 reliably as being pathogenic or nonpathogenic. For SMARCA2, SMARCA4, and SMARCE1 several variants in the EVS remained unclassified, underlining the importance of parental testing. We have entered all variant and clinical information in LOVD-powered databases to facilitate further genotype-phenotype correlations, as these will become increasingly important because of the uptake of targeted and untargeted next generation sequencing in diagnostics. The emerging phenotype-genotype correlation is that SMARCB1 patients have the most marked physical phenotype and severe cognitive and growth delay. The variability in phenotype seems most marked in ARID1A and ARID1B patients. Distal limbs anomalies are most marked in ARID1A patients and least in SMARCB1 patients. Numbers are small however, and larger series are needed to confirm this correlation.

SMARCA4 and SMARCE1 in gastric cancer: Correlation with ARID1A, and microsatellite stability, and SMARCE1/ERBB2 co-amplification.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown an association between certain subunits of the SWI/SNF complex with specific tumor characteristics in gastric cancer (GC). In an earlier study, we applied multiregional whole exome sequencing on multiple primary tumor samples and found alterations of the SWI/SNF complex in 78% of the cases. ERBB2, which encodes for Her2/neu, is a well-known predictive biomarker used to guide the treatment of GC in the palliative setting. SMARCE1, which encodes for a subunit of the SWI/SNF complex, is localized in close genetic proximity to ERBB2. AIM: As little is known about the significance of the SWI/SNF complex in GC biology and the potential relationship between ERBB2 and SMARCE1 upregulation, we examined the expression patterns of SMARCA4 and SMARCE1, two mutually exclusive catalytic ATPase subunits of the SWI/SNF complex, in a well characterized GC cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression of SMARCA4 and SMARCE1 was studied by immunohistochemistry in connection with clinicopathological patient characteristics in a cohort of 468 GCs. Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction was performed for amplification analysis on ERBB2 and SMARCE1. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical staining of whole-mount tissue sections found a diffusely "gray scale" expression of SMARCA4 in 446 (95.2%) GCs and of SMARCE1 in 463 (98.8%) GCs. The expression of SMARCA4 and SMARCE1 correlated significantly with ARID1A, p53, and microsatellite status. No correlation was found with the patient prognosis. The amplification analysis of SMARCE1 showed amplification in 4 of 34 cases. In 3 of 34 cases, SMARCE1 was co-amplified with ERBB2. We also found a co-expression of SMARCE1 and Her2/neu in a subset of patients. CONCLUSION: While the effect of a co-amplification is currently unknown, synergistic effects of SMARCE1 and Her2/neu overexpression should be explored in future studies, holding potential for an improved treatment of GC.

Smarce1 and Tensin 4 Are Putative Modulators of Corneoscleral Stiffness.

The biomechanical properties of the cornea and sclera are important in the onset and progression of multiple ocular pathologies and vary substantially between individuals, yet the source of this variation remains unknown. Here we identify genes putatively regulating corneoscleral biomechanical tissue properties by conducting high-fidelity ocular compliance measurements across the BXD recombinant inbred mouse set and performing quantitative trait analysis. We find seven cis-eQTLs and non-synonymous SNPs associating with ocular compliance, and show by RT-qPCR and immunolabeling that only two of the candidate genes, Smarce1 and Tns4, showed significant expression in corneal and scleral tissues. Both have mechanistic potential to influence the development and/or regulation of tissue material properties. This work motivates further study of Smarce1 and Tns4 for their role(s) in ocular pathology involving the corneoscleral envelope as well as the development of novel mouse models of ocular pathophysiology, such as myopia and glaucoma.