Synaptobrevin transmembrane domain determines the structure and dynamics of the SNARE motif and the linker region.

The vesicular protein synaptobrevin II (sybII) constitutes a central component of the SNARE complex, which mediates vesicle fusion in neuronal exocytosis. Previous studies revealed that the transmembrane domain (TMD) of sybII is playing a critical role in the fusion process and is involved in all distinct fusion stages from priming to fusion pore opening. Here, we analyzed sequence-dependent effects of sybII and of mutants of sybII on both structure and flexibility of the protein and the interactions with a phospholipid bilayer by means of microsecond atomistic simulations. The sybII TMD was found to direct the folding of both the juxtamembrane helix and of the connecting linker and thus to influence both the intrinsic helicity and flexibility. Fusion active peptides revealed two helical segments, one for the juxtamembrane region and one for the TMD, connected by a flexible linker. In contrast, a fusion-inactive poly-leucine TMD mutant assumes a structure with a comparably rigid linker that is suggested to hinder the formation of the trans-SNARE complex during fusion. Kinking of the TMD at the central glycine together with anchoring of the TMD via conserved tryptophans and a lysine in position 94 likely yields an enhanced flexibility of sybII for different membrane thickness. All studied peptides were found to deform the outer membrane layer by altering the lipid head group orientation, causing partial membrane dehydration and enhancing lipid protrusions. These effects weaken the integrity of the outer membrane layer and are attributed mainly to the highly charged linker and JM regions of sybII.

SNARE Modulators and SNARE Mimetic Peptides.

The soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein (SNAP) receptor (SNARE) proteins play a central role in most forms of intracellular membrane trafficking, a key process that allows for membrane and biocargo shuffling between multiple compartments within the cell and extracellular environment. The structural organization of SNARE proteins is relatively simple, with several intrinsically disordered and folded elements (e.g., SNARE motif, N-terminal domain, transmembrane region) that interact with other SNAREs, SNARE-regulating proteins and biological membranes. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the development of functional peptides that can modify SNARE-binding interfaces and modulate SNARE function. The ability of the relatively short SNARE motif to assemble spontaneously into stable coiled coil tetrahelical bundles has inspired the development of reduced SNARE-mimetic systems that use peptides for biological membrane fusion and for making large supramolecular protein complexes. We evaluate two such systems, based on peptide-nucleic acids (PNAs) and coiled coil peptides. We also review how the self-assembly of SNARE motifs can be exploited to drive on-demand assembly of complex re-engineered polypeptides.

Characteristics of SNARE proteins are defined by distinctive properties of SNARE motifs.

BACKGROUND: Syntaxin-1A and Sso1 are syntaxin family SNARE proteins engaged in synaptic vesicle fusion and yeast exocytosis. The syntaxin-1A SNARE motif can form a fusogenic SNARE complex with Sso1 partners. However, a chimera in which the SNARE motif in syntaxin-1A is introduced into Sso1 was not functional in yeast because the chimera is retained in the ER. Through the analysis of the transport defect of Sso1/syntaxin-1A chimeric SNAREs, we found that their SNARE motifs have distinctive properties. METHODS: Sso1, syntaxin-1A, and Sso1/syntaxin-1A chimeric SNAREs were expressed in yeast cells and their localization and interaction with other SNAREs are analyzed. RESULTS: SNARE proteins containing the syntaxin-1A SNARE motif exhibit a transport defect because they form a cis-SNARE complex in the ER. Ectopic SNARE complex formation can be prevented in syntaxin-1A by binding to a Sec1/Munc-18-like (SM) protein. In contrast, the SNARE motif of Sso1 does not form an ectopic SNARE complex. Additionally, we found that the SNARE motif in syntaxin-1A, but not that in Sso1, self-interacts, even when it is in the inactive form and bound to the SM protein. CONCLUSIONS: The SNARE motif in syntaxin-1A, but not in Sso1, likely forms ectopic SNARE complex. Because of this property, the SM protein is necessary for syntaxin-1A to prevent its promiscuous assembly and to promote its export from the ER. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Properties of SNARE motifs affect characteristics of SNARE proteins. The regulatory mechanisms of SNARE proteins are, in part, designed to handle such properties.