Incidence of Secondary Cancers After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Whether neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) induces secondary cancers is controversial. This retrospective cohort study describes the incidence of secondary cancers in LARC patients. METHODS: We compared 364 LARC patients who received conventional (50.4 Gy) or short course neoadjuvant radiation (25 Gy x 5 fractions) followed by resection to 142 patients with surgically resected rectal cancer who did not receive radiation at a single institution from 2004 to 2018. Secondary cancer was defined as any nonmetastatic noncolorectal malignancy diagnosed via biopsy or definitive imaging criteria at least 6 mo after completion of neoadjuvant therapy or after resection in the comparison group. RESULTS: Among the neoadjuvant radiation group (364 patients, 40% female, age 61 ± 13 y), 32 patients developed 34 (9.3%) secondary cancers. Three cases involved a pelvic organ. Among the comparison group (142 patients, 39% female, age 64 ± 15 y), 15 patients (10.6%) developed a secondary cancer. Five cases involved pelvic organs. Secondary cancer incidence did not differ between groups. Latency period to secondary cancer diagnosis was 6.7 ± 4.3 y. Patients who received radiation underwent longer median follow-up (6.8 versus 4.5 y, P < 0.01) and were significantly less likely to develop a pelvic organ cancer (odds ratio 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.83; P = 0.02). No genetic mutations or cancer syndromes were identified among patients with secondary cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is not associated with increased secondary cancer risk in LARC patients and may have a local protective effect on pelvic organs, especially prostate. Ongoing follow-up is critical to continue risk assessment.

Risk factors of secondary cancer in laryngeal, oropharyngeal, or hypopharyngeal cancer after definitive therapy.

BACKGROUND: Our previous research showed that a high rate of secondary carcinogenesis is observed during follow-up after transoral surgery in patients with early-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers. We speculate that the contributing factors are alcohol drinking, smoking, and aging; however, we could not provide clear evidence. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for secondary carcinogenesis in patients with these cancers, particularly factors associated with drinking and/or smoking. METHODS: The medical records of all-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer patients who had undergone definitive treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Assessments included visual and endoscopic observations of the primary site, enhanced cervical CT or US of the primary site and regional lymph nodes, PET-CT, and enhanced whole-body CT. Clinical characteristics were compared in patients with and without secondary carcinogenesis and in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer and patients with other cancers. RESULTS: Hypopharyngeal cancer was an independent risk factor for secondary cancer. The 5-year incidence rate of secondary cancer was 25.5%, 28.6%, and 41.2% in laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers, respectively. Radiotherapy was defined as an independent risk factor in hypopharyngeal cancer patients with secondary cancers. No direct correlation was found between secondary carcinogenesis and alcohol consumption, smoking, or aging. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hypopharyngeal cancer require close follow-up as they are at high risk of developing secondary cancer, possibly because out-of-field radiation exposure may induce systemic secondary carcinogenesis in hypopharyngeal cancer patients with genetic abnormality induced by alcohol consumption.

Exploring tonsillar cancer associations in patients with base of tongue cancer: insights from a single-center study.

PURPOSE: To explore the prevalence of synchronous and metachronous tonsillar cancer in patients with base of tongue cancer, as well as identifying potential risk factors linked to these secondary malignancies. We aim to answer the following question: Should bilateral tonsillectomy be recommended to patients diagnosed with base of tongue cancer? METHODS: A case-series study was conducted at Aarhus University Hospital, including all patients with histologically confirmed base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma treated between January 2012 and December 2021. Data from electronic patient records, including diagnosis of prior, synchronous or metachronous tonsillar cancer, demographics, and clinical features were analysed. Fisher's exact test was performed to assess factors associated with synchronous and metachronous tonsillar cancer. RESULTS: Among 198 patients with base of tongue cancer, 5.6% had a history of tonsillar cancer, either prior to (4.5%), synchronous (0.5%), or metachronous (0.5%) to the base of tongue diagnosis. The prevalence of synchronous or metachronous tonsillar cancer among patients without previous bilateral tonsillectomy was 1.2%. Patients with tonsillar cancer were older, had heavier smoking histories, and exhibited less frequent P16-overexpression. CONCLUSION: Our findings deepen understanding of tonsillar cancer in patients with base of tongue cancer. The prevalence of synchronous or metachronous tonsillar cancer was found to be relatively low, suggesting that routine tonsillectomy for all base of tongue cancer patients is not warranted.

Tongue cancer developing after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia: A case report.

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) is a form of acute myelogenous leukaemia. APL is characterised by anaemia due to suppression of normal haematopoiesis and infection. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is current option for the treatment of haematopoietic malignancies and is proving to be successful. Although HSCT has been effective for the treatment of haematopoietic malignant tumours, chronic graft-versushost disease (GVHD) but secondary cancers can occur, which is a serious complication and frequently involves the oral cavity and skin. Here, we report the case of tongue cancer occurring 17 years after transplantation in a patient who developed GVHD after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and APL remission. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of secondary oral cancer after HSCT with APL as the primary disease.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) vs. volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer patients-comparative analysis of dose distribution and estimation of projected secondary cancer risk.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare two techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim of the study was estimation of the projected risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer for both radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 25 patients who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), three treatment plans were generated: one using a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and two using volumetric modulated arc therapy. First VMAT-DIBH geometry consisted of three partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 3A) and second consisted of four partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 4A). Cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], ipsilateral and contralateral lung [IL, CL], and contralateral breast [CB]). Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) and organ equivalent doses (OEDs) were calculated using the differential DVHs. Excess absolute risks (EARs) for second cancers were estimated using Schneider's full mechanistic dose-response model. RESULTS: All plans fulfilled the criterium for PTV V95% ≥ 95%. The PTV coverage, homogeneity, and conformity indices were significantly better for VMAT-DIBH. VMAT showed a significantly increased mean dose and V5Gy for all OARs, but reduced LAD Dmax by 15 Gy. For IL, CL, and CB, the 3D-CRT DIBH method achieved the lowest values of EAR: 28.38 per 10,000 PYs, 2.55 per 10,000 PYs, and 4.48 per 10,000 PYs (p < 0.001), compared to 40.29 per 10,000 PYs, 15.62 per 10,000 PYs, and 23.44 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 3A plans and 41.12 per 10,000 PYs, 15.59 per 10,000 PYs, and 22.73 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 4A plans. Both techniques provided negligibly low NTCPs for all OARs. CONCLUSION: The study shows that VMAT-DIBH provides better OAR sparing against high doses. However, the large low-dose-bath (≤ 5 Gy) is still a concern due to the fact that a larger volume of normal tissues exposed to lower doses may increase a radiation-induced risk of secondary cancer.

Dose comparison of robustly optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) vs IMRT and VMAT photon plans for testicular seminoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with stage II seminoma have traditionally been treated with photons to the retroperitoneal and iliac space, which leads to a substantial dose bath to abdominal and pelvic organs at risk (OAR). As these patients are young and with excellent prognosis, reducing dose to OAR and thereby the risk of secondary cancer is of utmost importance. We compared IMPT to opposing IMRT fields and VMAT, assessing dose to OAR and both overall and organ-specific secondary cancer risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comparative treatment planning study was conducted on planning CT-scans from ten patients with stage II seminoma, treated with photons to a 'dog-leg' field with doses ranging from 20 to 25 Gy and a 10 Gy sequential boost to the metastatic lymph node(s). Photon plans were either 3-4 field IMRT (Eclipse) or 1-2 arc VMAT (Pinnacle). Proton plans used robust (5 mm; 3.5%) IMPT (Eclipse), multi field optimization with 3 posterior fields supplemented by 2 anterior fields at the level of the iliac vessels. Thirty plans were generated. Mean doses to OARs were compared for IMRT vs IMPT and VMAT vs IMPT. The risk of secondary cancer was calculated according to the model described by Schneider, using excess absolute risk (EAR, per 10,000 persons per year) for body outline, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, bowel, bladder and spinal cord. RESULTS: Mean doses to all OARs were significantly lower with IMPT except similar kidney (IMRT) and spinal cord (VMAT) doses. The relative EAR for body outline was 0.59 for IMPT/IMRT (p < .05) and 0.33 for IMPT/VMAT (p < .05). Organ specific secondary cancer risk was also lower for IMPT except for pancreas and duodenum. CONCLUSION: Proton therapy reduced radiation dose to OAR compared to both IMRT and VMAT plans, and potentially reduce the risk of secondary cancer both overall and for most OAR.

Hybrid planning techniques for early-stage left-sided breast cancer: dose distribution analysis and estimation of projected secondary cancer-relative risk.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (h-IMRT), and hybrid Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (h-VMAT, h-ARC), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim was to estimate the projected relative risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers for hybrid techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three treatment plans were prepared in 3D-CRT, h-IMRT, and h-VMAT techniques for each of the 40 patients, who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). For hybrid techniques, plans were created by combining 3D-CRT and dynamic fields with an 80%/20% dose ratio for 3D-CRT and IMRT or VMAT. Cumulative dose-volume histograms were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], left and right lung [LL, RL], right breast [RB]). Projected risk ratios for secondary cancers were estimated relative to 3D-CRT using the organ equivalent dose (OED) concept for the Schneider's linear exponential, plateau, and full mechanistic dose-response model. RESULTS: All plans fulfilled the PTV criterium: V95%≥95%. Compared to 3D-CRT, both hybrid techniques showed significantly better target coverage (PTV: V95%>98%, p < 0.001), and the best conformality was achieved by h-ARC plans (CI: 1.18 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). Compared to 3D-CRT and h-ARC, h-IMRT increased the average sum of monitor units (MU) over 129.9% (p < 0.001). H-ARC increased the mean dose of contralateral organs and the LL V5Gy parameter (p < 0.001). Both hybrid techniques significantly reduced the Dmax of the heart by 5 Gy. Compared to h-IMRT, h-ARC increased secondary cancer projected relative risk ratios for LL, RL, and RB by 18, 152, and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed that both hybrid techniques provide better target quality and OARs sparing than 3D-CRT. Hybrid VMAT delivers less MU compared to hybrid IMRT but may increase the risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies.

Secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation: case series and comprehensive literature review.

BACKGROUND: Secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation, so-called radiation-induced meningioma, is one of the important late effects after cranial radiation therapy. In this report, we analyzed our case series of secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation and conducted a critical review of literature to reveal the characteristics of secondary meningioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review by using Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google scholar databases and investigated pathologically confirmed individual cases. In our institute, we found pathologically diagnosed seven cases with secondary meningioma between 2000 and 2018. Totally, 364 cases were analyzed based on gender, WHO grade, radiation dose, chemotherapy. The latency years from irradiation to development of secondary meningioma were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the relationship between age at irradiation and the latency years. RESULTS: The mean age at secondary meningioma development was 35.6 ± 15.7 years and the mean latency periods were 22.6 ± 12.1 years. The latency periods from irradiation to the development of secondary meningioma are significantly shorter in higher WHO grade group (P = 0.0026, generalized Wilcoxon test), higher radiation dose group (P < 0.0001) and concomitant systemic chemotherapy group (P = 0.0003). Age at irradiation was negatively associated with the latency periods (r = -0.23231, P < 0.0001, Spearman's correlation test). CONCLUSION: Cranial irradiation at older ages, at higher doses and concomitant chemotherapy was associated with a shorter latency period to develop secondary meningiomas. However, even low-dose irradiation can cause secondary meningiomas after a long latency period. Long-term follow-up is necessary to minimize the morbidity and mortality caused by secondary meningioma after cranial irradiation.

Incidence risk assessment of secondary cancer due to radiotherapy of women with rectal cancer using BEIR VII, EPA, and ICRP models.

Background: Radiotherapy has a significant side effect known as radiation-induced secondary cancer. This study aims to evaluate the dose and secondary cancer risk for women with rectal cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) to the organs at risk (OARs) and some sensitive organs using different types of radiation-induced cancer risk prediction models, including Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIRVII), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), and compare the results of the different models for same organs. Materials and methods: Thirty female patients with rectal cancer were considered and dose calculations were based on the PCRT-3D treatment planning system, while the radiotherapy of the patients had been performed using Shinva linear accelerator with a total dose of 45 Gy at 25 fractions. Planning target volume (PTV), OARs, and some sensitive organs were contoured, three models were used to evaluate secondary cancer risk (SCR) using the excess relative risk (ERR) and excess absolute risk (EAR). Results: The bladder presents the highest risk, in terms of ERR, and the femur head and uterus in terms of EAR from the three models (BEIR VII, EPA, and ICRP). Conclusion: Based on the obtained results, radiotherapy of rectal cancer is relatively higher for the bladder and femur head, compared to the risk for other organs, the kidney risk is significantly lower. It was observed that the SCR from the ICRP model was higher compared to BEIR VII and EPA models.

Incidence rate and factors associated with the development of secondary cancers after radioiodine therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of secondary cancers and the factors associated with their development among patients who underwent radioiodine therapy (RIT) with differentiated thyroid cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively collected medical records for patients who underwent first RIT between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005, from seven tertiary hospitals in South Korea after total thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. Cancer incidence and calculated standardized rate ratio were compared with Korean cancer incidence data. The association between the development of secondary cancers and various parameters was analyzed by Cox-proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: A total of 3106 patients were included in this study. Mean age at the time of diagnosis of thyroid cancer was 45.7 ± 13.3 years old, and 2669 (85.9%) patients were female. The follow-up period was 11.9 ± 4.6 (range, 1.2-19.6) years. A total of 183 secondary cancers, which included 162 solid and 21 hematologic cancers, occurred in 173 patients (5.6%). There was no significant difference between solid cancer incidence in our study population who underwent RIT and the overall Korean population, but the incidence of hematologic cancers and total cancer in our study was significantly higher compared with that of the Korean population. A multivariate analysis identified independent prognostic factors for the development of secondary cancer including age at 1st RIT, male, and total cumulative dose over 200 mCi. CONCLUSION: We need to assess the risk benefit for patients who receive over 200 mCi of a total cumulative dose.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in the irradiation of infra diaphragmatic Hodgkin Lymphoma in female patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of infra diaphragmatic intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for female Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients and to estimate the risk of secondary cancer and ovarian failure. METHODS: A comparative treatment planning study was performed on 14 patients, and the results were compared according to conventional dose-volume metrics. In addition, estimates of the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer induction were determined for the bowel, the bladder and the rectum. For the ovaries, the risk of ovarian failure was estimated. RESULTS: The dosimetric findings demonstrate the equivalence between VMAT and IMPT in terms of target coverage. A statistically significant reduction of the mean and near-to-maximum doses was proven for the organs at risk. The EAR ratio estimated for IMPT to VMAT was 0.51 ± 0.32, 0.32 ± 0.35 and 0.05 ± 0.11 for the bowel, bladder and rectum, respectively. Concerning the risk of ovarian failure for the chronologic age ranging from 18 to 46 years, the expected net loss in fertility years ranged from 4.8 to 3.0 years for protons and 12.0 to 5.7 years for photons. CONCLUSION: This in-silico study confirmed the beneficial role of IMPT from a dosimetric point of view. Mathematical models suggested that the use of protons might be further advantageous due to the expected reduction of the risk of secondary cancer induction and its milder impact on the reduction of fertility.

A risk factor for newly diagnosed secondary cancer in patients with early-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, or hypopharyngeal cancer: sub-analysis of a prospective observation study.

BACKGROUND: We previously identified hypopharyngeal cancer as an independent risk factor for the incidence of newly diagnosed secondary cancers after the treatment of early-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers. We subsequently used a different patient cohort to validate the usefulness of this factor during the follow-up period in these patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent transoral surgery (TOS) as a definitive treatment between April 1, 2016, and September 30, 2020, were included. The incidence of secondary cancer was evaluated in hypopharyngeal and other cancers. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analyses based on the risk factors were also performed. RESULTS: Incidence of new secondary cancer was 30% in hypopharyngeal cancer patients as compared to 11% in other cancer patients, and the risk was 3.60-fold (95% confidence interval 1.07-12.10) higher after definitive treatment for initial head and neck cancers. The 3-year OS, RFS, and DFS rates were 98%, 86%, and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with early-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, who were initially treated with TOS, hypopharyngeal cancer patients had a higher risk of newly diagnosed secondary cancers as observed during the follow-up period.

Out-of-field effects: lessons learned from partial body exposure.

Partial body exposure and inhomogeneous dose delivery are features of the majority of medical and occupational exposure situations. However, mounting evidence indicates that the effects of partial body exposure are not limited to the irradiated area but also have systemic effects that are propagated outside the irradiated field. It was the aim of the "Partial body exposure" session within the MELODI workshop 2020 to discuss recent developments and insights into this field by covering clinical, epidemiological, dosimetric as well as mechanistic aspects. Especially the impact of out-of-field effects on dysfunctions of immune cells, cardiovascular diseases and effects on the brain were debated. The presentations at the workshop acknowledged the relevance of out-of-field effects as components of the cellular and organismal radiation response. Furthermore, their importance for the understanding of radiation-induced pathologies, for the discovery of early disease biomarkers and for the identification of high-risk organs after inhomogeneous exposure was emphasized. With the rapid advancement of clinical treatment modalities, including new dose rates and distributions a better understanding of individual health risk is urgently needed. To achieve this, a deeper mechanistic understanding of out-of-field effects in close connection to improved modelling was suggested as priorities for future research. This will support the amelioration of risk models and the personalization of risk assessments for cancer and non-cancer effects after partial body irradiation.

Skin changes in hairy cell leukemia.

Skin lesions have been reported in about 10-12% of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) patients. Most are etiologically related to autoimmune or infectious processes, although secondary cutaneous neoplasms and drug-induced lesions are also reported. However, leukemia cutis with the direct infiltration of the skin by leukemic cells is extremely rare in HCL patients. This paper reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical symptoms, diagnosis, and approach to treating skin lesions in HCL. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles in English concerning hairy cell leukemia, skin lesions, leukemia cutis, adverse events, infectious, cutaneous, drug reactions, neutrophilic dermatoses, secondary neoplasms, and vasculitis was conducted via PubMed. Publications from January 1980 to September 2020 were scrutinized. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles.

Risk of second HPV-associated cancers in men with penile cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the risk of HPV-associated oral cavity, oropharyngeal or anal cancer in men with penile cancer to test the hypothesis of an increased risk to develop a second HPV-associated cancer later in life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based register study including all men in Sweden diagnosed with penile cancer between 2000 and 2012. For each patient, six men without penile cancer were matched based on age and county of residence. Data were retrieved from Swedish cancer and population registers, to assess the risk of oral cavity, oropharyngeal or anal cancer in patients with penile cancer. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risks in men with penile cancer were also compared with the background Swedish male population by use of standardized incidence ratios. RESULTS: In total, 1634 men with and 9804 without penile cancer were included in the study. Among men with penile cancer, four men were subsequently diagnosed with oral cavity cancer, one with oropharyngeal cancer and one with anal cancer. Corresponding numbers among the penile cancer-free men were ten, two and three, respectively. There was evidence of an increased risks of all three cancers under study with an HR of 2.84 (95% CI 0.89-9.06) for oral cavity cancer, 3.66 (95% CI 0.33-40.39) for oropharyngeal cancer and 2.34 (95% CI 0.24-22.47) for anal cancer. When comparing the incidence of these malignancies between penile cancer patients and the background population, the patterns of association were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that men with penile cancer are at an increased risk of a second HPV-associated cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx and anal canal. Considering that our study was based on small numbers reflecting the rarity of these cancers, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

The incidence of newly diagnosed secondary cancer; sub-analysis the prospective study of the second-look procedure for transoral surgery in patients with T1 and T2 head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Our prospective study of patients with early T-stage head and neck cancer indicated a high incidence of newly diagnosed secondary malignancies during the follow-up period. We aimed to determine the incidence rate and risk factors of secondary malignancies in early-stage head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: We sub-analyzed the patient data of a previous study focusing on secondary cancer incidence. The endpoints were statistical analyses of risk factors and survival and incidence rates. RESULTS: The incidence rate of secondary cancer was 37%, the crude incidence of second primary cancers was 10.6 per 100 person-years, and the 5 year secondary cancer-free survival rate was 63%. The hypopharynx as the primary site was an independent significant predictive factor (odds ratio 3.96, 95% confidence interval 1.07-14.6, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Early stages of laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer had a risk of secondary cancer, especially hypopharyngeal cancer. Attention to the secondary cancer has to be paid during the follow-up period after controlling the early-stage disease. These findings highlight the need for awareness of the incidence of secondary cancer in cases of early-stage primary head and neck cancer.

Risk of second primary cancers among survivors of gynecological cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Survivors of gynecologic cancers have an increased risk of developing second primary cancers (SPC); however it is unclear which sites have higher risks. We aimed to ascertain risk of SPC among survivors of gynecological cancer, and identify anatomic sites at risk of SPC. METHODS: We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2000-2016) for confirmed cases of index gynecological (cervix uteri [cervical], corpus and uterus [endometrial], ovarian, vaginal, and vulvar) cancers. Risk of SPC was estimated using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs: observed/expected cases) and excess absolute risks (EARs: observed - expected cases) per 10,000 person-years at risk (PYR). SIRs and EARs were stratified by index anatomic site and latency interval. RESULTS: Among the cohort of 301,210 gynecological cancer survivors, 19,005 (6.31%) developed an SPC (SIR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.15-1.18 and EAR = 17.2 cases per 10,000 PYR) compared with the general population. All gynecological cancer survivors (except survivors of ovarian) had a significant risk of developing SPC (SIR range 1.06-2.16), with survivors of vulvar cancer having the highest risk (SIR = 2.16; 95% CI, 2.06-2.27; EAR = 139.5 per 10,000 PYR). Risk of SPC was highest within the first 5 years post-diagnosis for survivors of cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancers. CONCLUSIONS: While most index gynecological cancer sites are associated with increased risk of SPC, risk is highest among survivors of vulvar cancer. These findings have the potential to inform lifelong surveillance recommendations for gynecological cancer survivors.

Thyroid tumor surveillance using ultrasound in childhood cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: The optimal method for thyroid cancer screening in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) who received radiation involving the thyroid gland is still debated. We describe a case series of ultrasound surveillance for thyroid tumor in CCSs in our institute. METHODS: We conducted thyroid tumor surveillance for CCSs with a history of radiation therapy involving the thyroid. The basic screening method was palpation. Thyroid ultrasound was also performed for patients who agreed after its benefits and risks were explained to them. We surveyed CCSs who visited the long-term follow-up outpatient clinic in our institution between October 2014 and September 2018. RESULTS: Of 82 CCSs who visited our institution during the study period, 44 were eligible for inclusion. None had a mass identified by palpation. Thyroid ultrasound was performed in 39 CCSs, and we identified thyroid nodules in 27. Four patients had a nodule with malignant echo features. Two of these cases received biopsies, and one patient was ultimately diagnosed with an early stage thyroid carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood cancer survivors irradiated in the thyroid had a higher prevalence of thyroid nodules than the general population. Ultrasound screening contributed to early detection of impalpable thyroid cancer and enabled us to perform minimal surgery. Thus, ultrasound appears to be a useful option for secondary thyroid cancer screening. The thyroid tumor surveillance modality should be considered according to the individual case, and the patient must receive a clear explanation of the benefits and risks. These results could help doctors consider how to screen for secondary thyroid cancer.

Temporal trends of subsequent breast cancer among women with ovarian cancer: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: To examine trends, characteristics and outcomes of women who develop both ovarian and breast cancers. METHODS: This is a retrospective study examining the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 1973 to 2013. Among ovarian cancer (n = 133,149) and breast cancer (n = 1,143,219) cohorts, women with both diagnoses were identified and temporal trends, tumor characteristics and survival were examined. RESULTS: There were 6446 women with both malignancies, representing 4.8% of the ovarian cancer cohort and 0.6% of the breast cancer cohort. Women with ovarian cancer who had secondary breast cancer were younger than those without secondary breast cancer early in the study period (52.3 versus 59.2 in 1973) but older in more recent years (68.5 versus 62.1 in 2013, P < 0.001). The number of breast cancer survivors who developed postcedent ovarian cancer decreased from 1.5 to 0.2% from 1979 to 2008 (relative risk reduction 90.0%, P < 0.05). Similarly, the number of ovarian cancer survivors who developed postcedent breast cancer decreased from 7.2 to 2.0% from 1973 to 2008 (relative risk reduction 72.4%, P < 0.05). Tumor characteristics were more likely to be favorable in women with ovarian cancer who developed postcedent breast cancer but unfavorable in those who had antecedent breast cancer (all, P < 0.05). Women with ovarian cancer who had secondary breast cancer had superior cause-specific survival compared to those who did not develop breast cancer regardless of breast cancer timing (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the demographics of women who develop breast cancer and ovarian cancer have changed over time and diagnosis of secondary breast cancer after ovarian cancer has decreased.

Estimation of secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients with pelvic irradiation.

We aimed to estimate the risk of secondary cancer after radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients with pelvic irradiation. Computed tomography data of five biopsy-proven HRPC patients were selected for this study. Two different planning target volumes (PTV1 and PTV2 ) were contoured for each patient. The PTV1 included the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvic lymphatics, while the PTV2 included only the prostate and seminal vesicles. The prescribed dose was 54 Gy for the PTV1 with a sequential boost (24 Gy for the PTV2 ). Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques were used to generate treatment plans with 6 and 10 MV photon energies with the flattening filter (FF) or flattening filter-free (FFF) irradiation mode. The excess absolute risks (EARs) were calculated and compared for the bladder, rectum, pelvic bone, and soft tissue based on the linear-exponential, plateau, full mechanistic, and specific mechanistic sarcoma dose-response model. According to the models, all treatment plans resulted in similar risks of secondary bladder or rectal cancer and pelvic bone or soft tissue sarcoma except for the estimated risk of the bladder according to the full mechanistic model using IMRT(6MV;FF) technique compared with VMAT techniques with FFF options. The overall estimation of EAR indicated that the radiation-induced cancer risk due to RT in HRPC was lower for bladder than the rectum. EAR values ranged from 1.47 to 5.82 for bladder and 6.36 to 7.94 for rectum, depending on the dose-response models used. The absolute risks of the secondary pelvic bone and soft tissue sarcoma were small for the plans examined. We theoretically predicted the radiation-induced secondary cancer risk in HRPC patients with pelvic irradiation. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials, with larger patient cohorts with a long-term follow-up, are needed to validate these model predictions.