RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Many lymph nodes resected from early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients haven't metastasis. Selective lymph node dissection (SLND) can reduce surgical trauma by retaining non-metastatic lymph nodes, we aimed to investigate whether SLND could reduce immune impairment compared with systematic lymph node dissection. METHODS: According to the selection criteria, patients with no metastasis in hilar and regional lymph nodes were selected as the research subjects. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: the SLND group (Group SD) and the systematic lymph node dissection group (Group CD). At 24 hours before surgery and on the 1st and 3rd postoperative days (POD), fasting venous blood was sampled to detect cytokine indicators [interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP)], cellular immune indicators [lymphocytes, natural killer cells (NK cells), CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+], and humoral immune indicators (IgG, IgA, IgM). At the same time, clinically indicators of the patients were recorded. All indicators between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The comparison of clinical indicators between the two groups showed that SLND is more conducive to patients' rapid recovery after surgery. CRP and IL-6 levels in Group CD were significantly higher than those in Group SD after surgery (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups in the proportions of lymphocytes and NK cells after surgery (P>0.05). The proportions of CD4+ cells and CD4+/CD8+ in Group CD were significantly lower than those in Group SD at POD1 (P<0.05). The proportion of CD8+ cells was significantly higher in Group CD than in Group SD at POD3 (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in IgG, IgA, and IgM levels between the 2 groups at the same point in time (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with systematic lymph node dissection, SLND has the following advantages: (I) it is more conducive to patients' rapid recovery after surgery; (II) it can reduce the body's acute inflammatory response and non-specific immune damage; (III) it can reduce the damage to cellular immune function caused by surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100045893.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: More and more pulmonary nodules are detected by CT scan, and postoperative pathology reveals many lymph nodes without metastasis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of T1 stage lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to explore the indications for selective lymph node dissection (SLND). METHODS: A total of 841 patients with stage T1 of NSCLC were performed lobectomy and systemic lymphadenectomy. We analyzed the types of lymph node metastases and the relationship between lymph node metastasis and pulmonary pleural invasion, thrombosis of vascular carcinoma and tumor size in all patients. RESULTS: Among them, 257 cases of tumor in the right upper lobe (RUL) and 186 cases in the left upper lobe (LUL), and no metastasis was found in the inferior mediastinal lymph nodes. Tumor metastases occurred in subcarinal lymph nodes, with hilar and/or mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Among the 171 cases with right lower lobe (RLL) tumors and the 151 cases with left lower lobe (LLL) tumors, patients with superior lymph node metastasis were all associated with hilar and/or subcarinal lymph node metastasis. Among the 76 cases with right middle lobe (RML) tumors, no metastasis with inferior mediastinal lymph node was observed. Lymph node metastasis is much easier in patients with pulmonary pleural invasion or thrombosis of vascular cancer. The larger the tumor diameter, the greater the possibility of lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: SLND is a feasible treatment for clinical T1 stage NSCLC under the guidance of intraoperative frozen results of lobe-specific lymph nodes.