Radiographic and surgery-related predictive factors for increased segmental lumbar lordosis following lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate preoperative (pre-op) radiographic characteristics and specific surgical interventions in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) who underwent lumbar fusion surgery (LFS), with a focus on analyzing predictors of postoperative restoration of segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL). METHODS: A retrospective review at a single center identified consecutive single-level DLS patients who underwent LFS between 2016 and 2022. Radiographic measures included disc angle (DA), SLL, lumbar lordosis (LL), anterior/posterior disc height (ADH/PDH), spondylolisthesis percentage (SP), intervertebral disc degeneration, and paraspinal muscle quality. Surgery-related measures included cage position, screw insertion depth, spondylolisthesis reduction rate, and disc height restoration rate. A change in SLL ≥ 4° indicated increased segmental lumbar lordosis (ISLL), and unincreased segmental lumbar lordosis (UISLL) < 4°. Propensity score matching was employed for a 1:1 match between ISLL and UISLL patients based on age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, and osteoporosis condition. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients with an average follow-up of 20.9 months were enrolled. Compared to UISLL patients, ISLL patients had significantly lower pre-op DA (6.78° vs. 11.84°), SLL (10.73° vs. 18.24°), LL (42.59° vs. 45.75°), and ADH (10.09 mm vs. 12.21 mm) (all, P < 0.05). ISLL patients were predisposed to more severe intervertebral disc degeneration (P = 0.047) and higher SP (21.30% vs. 19.39%, P = 0.019). The cage was positioned more anteriorly in ISLL patients (67.00% vs. 60.08%, P = 0.000), with more extensive reduction of spondylolisthesis (- 73.70% vs. - 56.16%, P = 0.000) and higher restoration of ADH (33.34% vs. 8.11%, P = 0.000). Multivariate regression showed that lower pre-op SLL (OR 0.750, P = 0.000), more anterior cage position (OR 1.269, P = 0.000), and a greater spondylolisthesis reduction rate (OR 0.965, P = 0.000) significantly impacted SLL restoration. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-op SLL, cage position, and spondylolisthesis reduction rate were identified as significant predictors of SLL restoration after LFS for DLS. Surgeons are advised to meticulously select patients based on pre-op SLL and strive to position the cage more anteriorly while minimizing spondylolisthesis to maximize SLL restoration.

Longitudinal impact of multi-segment spinal fixation surgery on mobility status and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To investigate changes in postoperative mobility status in patients with ASD, and the determining factors that influence these changes and their impact on clinical outcomes, including the rate of home discharge and long-term mobility. METHODS: A total of 299 patients with ASD who underwent multi-segment posterior spinal fusion were registered in a multi-center database were investigated. Patient mobility status was assessed using walking aids and classified into five levels (1: independent, 2: cane, 3: walker, 4: assisted, and 5: wheelchair) preoperatively, at discharge, and after 2 years. We determined improvements or declines in the patient's mobility based on changes in the classification levels. The analysis focused on the factors contributing to the deterioration of postoperative mobility. RESULTS: Two years postoperatively, 87% of patients maintained or improved mobility. However, 27% showed decreased mobility status at discharge, associated with a lower rate of home discharge (49% vs. 80% in the maintained mobility group) and limited improvement in mobility status (35% vs. 5%) after 2 years. Notably, postoperative increases in thoracic kyphosis (7.0 ± 12.1 vs. 2.0 ± 12.4°, p = 0.002) and lower lumbar lordosis (4.2 ± 13.1 vs. 1.8 ± 12.6°, p = 0.050) were substantial factors in mobility decline. CONCLUSION: Postoperative mobility often temporarily decreases but generally improves after 2 years. However, an overcorrection in sagittal alignment, evidenced by increased TK, could detrimentally affect patients' mobility status. Transient mobility decline associated with overcorrection may require further rehabilitation or hospitalization. Further studies are required to determine the biomechanical effects of surgical correction on mobility.

Validation of Roussouly classification in predicting the occurrence of adjacent segment disease after short-level lumbar fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that restoring sagittal alignment to the original Roussouly type can remarkably reduce complication rates after adult spinal deformity surgery. However, there is still no data proving the benefit of maintaining ideal Roussouly shape in the lumbar degenerative diseases and its association with the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Thus, this study was performed to validate the usefulness of Roussouly classification to predict the occurrence of ASD after lumbar fusion surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 234 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent 1- or 2-level fusion surgery. Demographic and radiographic data were compared between ASD and non-ASD groups. The patients were classified by both "theoretical" [based on pelvic incidence (PI)] and "current" (based on sacral slope) Roussouly types. The patients were defined as "matched" if their "current" shapes matched the "theoretical" types and otherwise as "mismatched". The logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with ASD. Finally, clinical data and spinopelvic parameters of "theoretical" and "current" types were compared. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up duration of 70.6 months, evidence of ASD was found in the 68 cases. Postoperatively, ASD group had more "current" shapes classified as type 1 or 2 and fewer as type 3 than the non-ASD group (p < 0.001), but the distribution of "theoretical" types was similar between groups. Moreover, 80.9% (55/68) of patients with ASD were mismatched, while 48.2% (80/166) of patients without ASD were mismatched (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.058)], 2-level fusion (OR = 2.9830), postoperative distal lordosis (DL, OR = 0.949) and mismatched Roussouly type (OR = 4.629) as independent risk factors of ASD. Among the four "theoretical" types, type 2 had the lowest lumbar lordosis, DL, and segmental lordosis. When considering the "current" types, current type 2 was associated with higher rates of 2-level fusion, worse DL, and greater pelvic tilt compared with other current types. CONCLUSIONS: DL loss and mismatched Roussouly type were significant risk factors of ASD. To decrease the incidence of ASD, an appropriate value of DL should be achieved to restore sagittal alignment back to the ideal Roussouly type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Radiographic predictors of reaching minimal clinically important difference following lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to (1) compare sagittal alignment between patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) who reached or missed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for clinical outcomes following lumbar fusion surgery (LFS) and (2) identify radiographic predictors associated with MCID achievement in DLS patients. METHODS: A total of 91 single-level DLS patients who underwent LFS and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up were enrolled in this study. The assessed radiographic parameters included thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL), slip percentage, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and sagittal vertical axis. Changes in radiographic parameters were determined by subtracting the preoperative value from the final follow-up measurement. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for both back and leg pain. MCID values were set at 10 points for ODI, 2.1 points for VAS back pain, and 2.8 points for VAS leg pain. Patients were assigned to the reached MCID (rMCID) and missed MCID (mMCID) groups based on the postoperative (post-op) recovery of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, 68.1% (62/91), 72.5% (66/91), and 76.9% (70/91) of patients reached MCID for ODI, VAS back pain, and VAS leg pain, respectively. Concerning ODI, the rMCID group exhibited higher post-op LL (47.93° vs. 42.95°, P = 0.044), higher post-op SLL (17.08° vs. 14.41°, P = 0.032), higher post-op SS (34.46° vs. 30.63°, P = 0.027), higher ∆LL (5.90° vs. 2.44°, P = 0.017), higher ∆SLL (4.63° vs. - 1.03°, P < 0.001), higher ∆SS (4.76° vs. 1.23°, P = 0.002), lower post-op PT/PI (36.95% vs. 42.01%, P = 0.049), lower ∆PT (- 3.71° vs. 1.05°, P < 0.001), lower ∆PT/PI (- 7.45% vs. 1.97%, P < 0.001), and lower ∆PI-LL (- 5.43° vs. - 3.71°, P = 0.011) than the mMCID group. Regarding VAS back pain, the rMCID group showed higher post-op SLL (17.06° vs. 14.05°, P = 0.021), higher post-op SS (34.34° vs. 30.33°, P = 0.027), higher ∆SLL (3.93° vs. - 0.09°, P < 0.001), and lower ∆PT (- 2.91° vs. - 0.30°, P = 0.039) than the mMCID group. For VAS leg pain, higher ∆SLL (3.55° vs. 0.41°, P = 0.003) was observed in the rMCID group than in the mMCID group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher ∆SLL, higher ∆SS, and higher post-op SS were independent predictors for the achievement of MCID in patients with DLS. CONCLUSION: DLS patients who reached MCID following LFS demonstrated improved post-op spinopelvic alignment. Higher ∆SLL, higher ∆SS, and higher post-op SS were the critical parameters associated with MCID achievement in patients with DLS.

Sacral incidence to pubis: a novel and alternative morphologic radiological parameter to pelvic incidence in assessing spinopelvic sagittal alignment.

BACKGROUND: Although pelvic incidence (PI) is a key morphologic parameter in assessing spinopelvic sagittal alignment, accurate measurements of PI become difficult in patients with severe hip dislocation or femoral head deformities. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of our novel morphologic parameters and the correlations with established sagittal spinopelvic parameters. METHODS: One hundred healthy volunteers (25 male and 75 female), with an average age of 38.9 years, were analysed. Whole-body alignment in the standing position was measured using a slot-scanning X-ray imager. We measured the established spinopelvic sagittal parameters and a novel parameter: the sacral incidence to pubis (SIP). The correlation coefficient of each parameter, regression equation of PI using SIP, and regression equation of lumbar lordosis (LL) using PI or SIP were obtained. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated as an evaluation of the measurement reliability. RESULTS: Reliability analysis showed high intra- and inter-rater agreements in all the spinopelvic parameters, with ICCs > 0.9. The SIP and pelvic inclination angle (PIA) demonstrated strong correlation with PI (R = 0.96) and pelvic tilt (PT) (R = 0.92). PI could be predicted according to the regression equation: PI = - 9.92 + 0.905 * SIP (R = 0.9596, p < 0.0001). The ideal LL could be predicted using the following equation using PI and age: ideal LL = 32.33 + 0.623 * PI - 0.280 * age (R = 0.6033, p < 0.001) and using SIP and age: ideal LL = 24.29 + 0.609 * SIP - 0.309 * age (R = 0.6177, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both SIP and PIA were reliable parameters for determining the morphology and orientation of the pelvis, respectively. Ideal LL was accurately predicted using the SIP with equal accuracy as the PI. Our findings will assist clinicians in the assessment of spinopelvic sagittal alignment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ( UMIN000042979 ; January 13, 2021).

Impact of Spinopelvic sagittal alignment on the surgical outcomes of dropped head syndrome: a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Most of the previous studies about the surgical treatment of dropped head syndrome (DHS) are small case series, and their primary outcome measures were cervical alignment parameters. Therefore, little is known about the associations between pre- and postoperative global sagittal alignment in the whole spine and the clinical outcomes of the surgical treatment of DHS. In this study, we investigated the surgical outcomes of DHS, including correction of cervical and global spinal sagittal alignment. METHODS: This study was a retrospective observational study. Fifteen patients with DHS who had undergone correction surgery were enrolled. Surgical outcomes, including complications and implant failures, were investigated. We assessed cervical alignment parameters as well as spinopelvic global alignment parameters, including pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and C7-sacral sagittal vertical axis (SVA). We examined the changes in these parameters using pre- and posoperative whole spine lateral radiographs. The parameters were compared between the failure and nonfailure groups. RESULTS: Recurrence of sagittal imbalance and horizontal gaze difficulty was observed in 6 cases (40%). In all, 3 cases (20%) exhibited a distal junctional failure and required multiple surgeries with extension of fusion. Of all the radiographic parameters compared between the failure and nonfailure groups, significant differences were only observed in pre and postoperative SVA and PI-LL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the global sagittal alignment parameters, including PI-LL and SVA, were different between the patients with failure and non failure, and these parameters might have notable impacts on surgical outcomes. Surgeons should consider PI-LL and SVA while determining the surgical course for patients with DHS.

Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals.

PURPOSE: This study aims to establish normative data for parameters of spino-pelvic and spinal sagittal alignment, gender related differences and age-related changes in asymptomatic subjects. METHODS: A total of 626 asymptomatic volunteers from Japanese population were enrolled in this study, including 50 subjects at least for each gender and each decade from 3rd to 8th. Full length, free-standing spine radiographs were obtained. Cervical lordosis (CL; C3-7), thoracic kyphosis (TK; T1-12), lumbar lordosis (LL; T12-S1), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured. RESULTS: The average values (degrees) are 4.1 ± 11.7 for CL, 36.0 ± 10.1 for TK, 49.7 ± 11.2 for LL, 53.7 ± 10.9 for PI, 14.5 ± 8.4 for PT, and 39.4 ± 8.0 for SS. Mean SVA is 3.1 ± 12.6 mm. Advancing age caused an increase in CL, PT and SVA, and a decrease in LL and SS. There was a significant gender difference in CL, TK, LL, PI, PT and SVA. From 7th decade to 8th decade, remarkable decrease of LL & TK and increase of PT were seen. A large increase of SVA was also seen between 60' and 70'. CONCLUSION: Standard values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment were established in each gender and each decade from 20' to 70'. A remarkable change of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment was seen from 7th decade to 8th decade in asymptomatic subjects.

The relationship between changes of cervical sagittal alignment after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and spino-pelvic sagittal alignment under roussouly classification: a four-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely used in the treatment of cervical degenerative disease; however, the variation of cervical sagittal alignment changes after ACDF has been rarely explored. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between changes of cervical sagittal alignment after ACDF and spino-pelvic sagittal alignment under Roussouly classification. METHODS: A cohort of 133 Chinese cervical spondylotic patients who received ACDF from 2011 to 2012 was recruited. All patients were categorized with Roussouly Classification. Lateral X-ray images of global spine were obtained, and preoperative and postoperative parameters were measured and analyzed, including C2-C7 angles (C2-C7), C0-C7 angles (C0-C7), external auditory meatus (EAM) tilt, sacral slope (SS), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), spinal sacral angles (SSA), Superior adjacent inter-vertebral angle (SAIV), inferior adjacent inter-vertebral angle (IAIV) and et al. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for intragroup comparisons preoperatively and at postoperative 48 months. RESULTS: Among the parameters, C2-C7 and C0-C7 showed significant increase, while EAM TK, and IAIV decreased significantly. In type I, EAM and TK decreased significantly, however SS showed a significant increase; in type II, TK showed a significant decrease, but SSA showed a significant increase; in type III, a significant increase of C0-C7 was observed with a significant decrease in EAM, nevertheless, LL, SS and SSA showed significant decreases; and in type IV, C2-C7 showed a significant increase and EAM decreased significantly. The percentage of lordotic alignment in cervical spine increased, which was presenting in type I, III and IV. Nevertheless, the amount of patients with straight cervical alignment increased in type II. CONCLUSION: The backward movement of head occurs is the compensatory mechanism in cervical sagittal alignment modifications after ACDF. The compensatory alteration of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment varied in different Roussouly type.

The correlation of sacral table angle to spinopelvic sagittal alignment in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: The sacrum plays an important role in sagittal balance of the spine, whereas the exact association between sacral parameters, specifically the sacral table angle (STA) and spinopelvic parameters has been only scarcely assessed. It aims to investigate the correlations between the sacral parameters and spinopelvic sagittal alignment parameters in healthy adults. METHODS: A cohort of 142 Northern Chinese healthy adults between 18 and 45 years old were recruited between April 2019 and March 2021. Full-spine standing X-ray films were performed for every volunteer. The sacral parameters were measured: sacral table angle (STA), sacral inclination (SI) and sacral slope (SS). The spinopelvic sagittal alignment parameters included: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis and the apex of lumbar lordosis (LLA). The correlations analysis, as well as the linear regression analysis, were performed between STA, SI and the spinopelvic parameters. RESULTS: An equation 'STA = SI + 90 - SS' was revealed to represent the interrelationships between STA, SI and SS. STA was statistically correlated with PI (rs = - 0.693), PT (rs = - 0.342), SS (rs = - 0.530), LL (rs = 0.454), and LLA (rs = 0.438). SI correlated with STA (rs = 0.329), PT (rs = - 0.562), SS (rs = - 0.612) and LL (rs = 0.476). Simple linear regression analysis also verified the correlation between STA and PI (y = - 1.047x + 149.4), SS (y = - 0.631x + 96.9), LL (y = 0.660x - 117.7), LLA (y = 0.032x + 0.535), and SI (y = 0.359x + 8.23). CONCLUSION: The equation 'STA = SI + 90 - SS' indicates the exact geometric relationship between STA, SI and SS. The sacral parameters, both STA and SI, correlate to the spinopelvic sagittal alignment parameters in healthy adults. The linear regression analysis results also give predictive models for spinopelvic sagittal alignment parameters based on the invariant parameter STA, which are helpful for surgeons in designing an ideal therapeutic plan.

Measurement of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in the relaxed seated position rather than in the straight seated position is suitable for assessing spinopelvic mobility in patients before total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The relationship between spinopelvic mobility and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has recently attracted attention. This study aimed to investigate the differences in sacral slope (SS) between two types of upright seated positions and to determine which seated position was appropriate for assessing spinopelvic mobility (change in SS from standing to sitting) before THA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 75 hips from 75 patients who had undergone primary THA. Each patient underwent preoperative lateral spinopelvic radiography in standing (st) and two seated positions: relaxed (rs) and straight (ss). The change in SS between each position (Δ) was measured. RESULTS: Differences in all spinopelvic sagittal alignment parameters between the two seated positions were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The range, median, and mean values of ΔSSss-rs were -2.0° to 26.5°, 6.8°, and 8.3°, respectively. ΔSSss-rs was significantly correlated with SS, LLA, and PFA in the relaxed seated position (r = -0.52, -0.39, and 0.37; p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively), but was not correlated to these parameters in the straight seated position. Of the 52 patients with normal spinopelvic mobility in the relaxed seated position (ΔSSst-rs > 10°), 24 (46%) patients were misrepresented as having a stiff spine in the straight seated position (ΔSSst-ss < 10°). CONCLUSION: The change in SS from the straight to the relaxed seated position widely varied in patients before THA. The spinopelvic radiograph in the relaxed seated position is appropriate when evaluating spinopelvic mobility for preoperative planning.

Correlation between the cervical sagittal alignment and spine - pelvic sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adults.

Background: Although there are studies that adequately document the linear correlation between pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis, few have analyzed the pelvic-spine correlation including the cervical spine. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study, wherein the cervical spine was evaluated using radiography and computed tomography (CT) scans, the lumbosacral spine and the pelvis was evaluated using radiography, in adult patients without spinal pathology. Using the Surgimap tool, cervical and spinopelvic parameters were calculated by several investigators. To evaluate the correlation between cervical and spinopelvic parameters, Spearman's coefficient was calculated. To evaluate the concordance correlation of the measured parameters of cervical sagittal alignment on tomography and conventional radiography, Lin's coefficient was calculated and Bland-Altman plots were performed. Results: A total of 51 healthy adults were included in a follow-up from January 2019 to December 2020. Cervical sagittal alignment and sagittal spinopelvic alignment were assessed using radiography, and a correlation was observed between T1 slope (T1S) and lumbar mismatch (coefficient of 0.28, P = 0.047). Then, cervical sagittal alignment was evaluated using CT and sagittal spinopelvic alignment using radiography, and no correlation was observed between PI and thoracic inlet angle or cervical mismatch with lumbar mismatch. Conclusion: In asymptomatic patients, in whom cervical sagittal alignment and spinal-pelvic alignment were evaluated, only a positive correlation was found between lumbar mismatch and T1S, which lacks clinical significance. No concordance was identified between lumbar mismatch and cervical mismatch. Therefore, it is inferred that there is an independence between the sagittal spine-pelvic alignment with respect to the sagittal cervical alignment.

Relationship Between Age-Related Spinopelvic Sagittal Alignment and Low Back Pain in Adults of Population-Based Cohorts: The ROAD Study.

PURPOSE: The demand for surgical correction in elderly patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) has recently increased with the growth of the aging population. Age-related changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment have been recently reported; thus, sagittal realignment should consider age-related changes. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between age-specific sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters and low back pain (LBP) to support the establishment of age-specific realignment targets for patients with ASD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population-based cohort consisting of 1461 subjects (466 men and 995 women) was used. The participants were divided into five groups based on their age: (1) younger than 50 years, (2) 50-59 years, (3) 60-69 years, (4) 70-79 years, and (5) 80 years and older. Standing lateral whole-spine radiographs were assessed to measure lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). In addition, all participants were asked if they had LBP or not, using the following question: "Have you experienced LBP on most days during the past month and/or now?". RESULTS: The crucial parameter associated with LBP was the mismatch between PI and LL (PI-LL). The mean values of all the radiographic parameters increased with age. PI-LL and PT reached 11.5° and 25.6°, respectively, for women without LBP in the super-aged group (age >80 years), which did not lie in the range of optimal values reported in the previous literature. CONCLUSION: A new optimal age-related target may be needed for the management of patients with ASD.