Overall survival and oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cT2a renal tumors: A collaborative international study from the French kidney cancer research network UroCCR.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended as first-line treatment for cT1 stage kidney tumors because of a better renal function and probably a better overall survival than radical nephrectomy (RN). For larger tumors, PN has a controversial position due to lack of evidence showing good cancer control. The aim of this study was to compare the results of PN and RN in cT2a stage on overall survival and oncological results. METHOD: A retrospective international multicenter study was conducted in the frame of the French kidney cancer research network (UroCCR). We considered all patients aged≥18 years who underwent surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stage cT2a (7.1-10cm) between 2000 and 2014. Cox and Fine-Gray models were performed to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and cancer-free survival (CFS). Comparison between PN and RN was realized after an adjustment by propensity score considering predefined confounding factors: age, sex, tumor size, pT stage of the TNM classification, histological type, ISUP grade, ASA score. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were included. OS at 3 and 5 years was 93.6% and 78.7% after PN and 88.0% and 76.2% after RN, respectively. CSS at 3 and 5 years was 95.4% and 80.2% after PN and 91.0% and 85.0% after RN. No significant difference between groups was found after propensity score adjustment for OS (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.05, P=0.75), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18-1.54, P=0.24) and CFS (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.50-2.09, P=0.96). CONCLUSION: PN seems equivalent to RN for OS, CSS and CFS in cT2a stage kidney tumors. The risk of recurrence is probably more related to prognostic factors than the surgical technique. The decision to perform a PN should depend on technical feasibility rather than tumor size, both to imperative and elective situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Surveillance of stage I testicular seminoma: 20 years oncological results]. / Surveillance des séminomes testiculaires de stade I: résultats oncologiques sur 20ans.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the oncological results of a population of patients which undergo surveillance after diagnosis of stage I testicular seminoma (2, 5 and 8 years overall, specific and recurrence free survival). We also research recurrence risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have looked at the data of all patients treated in our center since 1993 for a grade I testicular seminoma. We focused on age at diagnosis, biological (tumoral markers) and pathological (tumor size, rete testis, lymphovascular, tunica albuginea or spermatic cord invasion) data. During surveillance, we noted the number, the localization and the interval until recurrence and death. We calculated 2, 5 and 8 years overall, specific and recurrence-free survival and searched recurrence risk factors. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (mean age: 37) were followed during a mean time of 97 months. Sixty-three per cent of the tumours were less than 4 cm (50 lesions). Lymphovascular, rete testis, spermatic cord and tunica albuginea invasion were present in respectively 21%, 33%, 4% and 29% of the cases. LDH and HCG were above normal rate in respectively 44 and 27% of the cases. Eighteen patients (23%) relapsed at a mean time of 12 months. Recurrence-free survival was respectively 81%, 77% and 77% at 2, 5 and 8 years. Tumor size<4 cm (P = 0.002), rete testis invasion (P = 0.03) and stage ≥ pT2 (P = 0.012) were associated with recurrence in univariate analysis. Using multivariate analysis, only tumor size >4 cm was a recurrence risk factor (risk multiplied by 3). At the end of the study, 77 patients are alive (97.5%). Overall and specific survival was 97.5% at 2, 5 and 8 years. CONCLUSION: We show here the interest of surveillance in case of stage 1 testicular seminoma. The overall and specific survivals are the same as after chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Furthermore, we confirm the role of tumor size to stratify recurrence risk.

[Comparative oncologic and functional outcomes of prostate cancer surgery with other curative treatments]. / Comparaison des résultats oncologiques et fonctionnels de la chirurgie avec les autres traitements curatifs du cancer de la prostate.

OBJECTIVE: Review of the comparative results of different treatment strategies (surgery, radiotherapy, ultrasound, surveillance) of prostate cancer, in which the main goal is the local control and the second target is the tolerance of the side effects of those treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of literature using Medline databases selected based on scientific relevance. Clinical keys centered on the oncological and functional outcomes of comparative series between different curative treatments. RESULTS: The numerous comparative series between surgery and other therapeutic modalities are essentially retrospective with significant methodological bias that is difficult to overcome in order to formulate the optimal thesis. However, there is a clear tendency toward surgery usually with young patients who have intermediate risk tumors without important comorbidity. CONCLUSION: In the absence of randomized comparative series with significant power, the oncological and functional results of the radical prostatectomy with or without adjuvant treatment seem at least the same, in a selected population of patients, compared with the combination of radiotherapy-hormonotherapy in terms of survival, without biochemical recurrence, disease-specific survival and overall survival, for the aggressive tumors necessitating curative local treatments.

Palliative radiotherapy: New prognostic factors for patients with bone metastasis.

PURPOSE: Many cancer patients develop bone metastases, however the prognosis of overall survival differs. To provide an optimal treatment for these patients, especially towards the end of life, a reliable prediction of survival is needed. The goal of this study was to find new clinical factors in relation to overall survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively 22 clinical factors were collected from 734 patients. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used. RESULTS: Most patients were diagnosed with lung cancer (29%), followed by prostate (19.8%) and breast cancer (14.7%). Median overall survival was 6.4months. Fourteen clinical factors showed significance in the univariate analyses. In the multivariate analyses 6 factors were found to be significant for the overall survival: Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor, gender, total organs affected, morphine use and systemic treatment options after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Morphine use and systemic treatment options after radiotherapy, Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor, gender and total organs affected are strong prediction factors on overall survival after palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastasis. These factors are easily applicable in the clinic.

Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy on thymoma.

PURPOSE: Thymoma is a rare tumour. The most common treatment for thymoma is surgical resection, while the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a monocentric observational study of 31 patients diagnosed with thymoma from June 2004 to July 2020 at cancer centre in Strasbourg, France. We analysed the outcomes of the patients. RESULTS: The 2- and 5- year locoregional relapse-free survival rates were 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76.5-99.5%) and 68.0% (95% CI: 43.8-83.5%), respectively. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly improved local tumour control (P=0.0008 and 0.04, respectively), while a larger initial tumour size significantly worsened local control rates (P=0.04). The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 87.1% (95% CI: 69.2-95%) and 81.7% (95% CI: 60.3-92.2%), respectively. The median overall survival was not reached, and no favourable factor was retrieved. For relapsed patients, the median overall survival after relapse was 115 months. CONCLUSION: Despite the inherent limitations of retrospective studies with a limited patient sample size, we demonstrated that chemotherapy and radiotherapy in addition to surgery were effective in achieving local control and contributed to improving patient outcomes in thymoma. Notably, an aggressive treatment strategy at the time of relapse resulted in favourable outcomes for retreated patients.

[State of results of HIPEC for epithelial ovarian cancer in the primary treatment or for relapse]. / État des lieux des résultats en termes de survie de la CHIP en primo-traitement et en récidive dans le cancer épithélial de l'ovaire.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is an unavoidable development of ovarian cancer, from the first treatment to relapses, and is the main cause of patients death. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), is a hope for cure for patients with ovarian cancer. HIPEC is based on direct application of chemotherapy on the perioneum with high concentration of chemotherapy enhanced with specific effects of hyperthermia. Theoretically, HIPEC could be proposed at different steps of ovarian cancer development. But the hypothesis of efficiency of a new treatment must be assessed before being routinely applied. Numerous clinical series are already published about HIPEC used in primary treatment of ovarian cancer or for relapses. These series are mostly retrospectives and based on heterogeneous parameters as inclusion criteria of patients, intra peritoneal chemotherapy, concentration, temperature, duration of HIPEC. Taking into account this heterogeneity it is not possible to draw strong scientific conclusions about HIPEC efficiency to treat ovarian cancer patients. We proposed a review allowing a better understanding of current recommendations of the use of HIPEC in ovarian cancer patients.

[Impact of NGS results on patient outcome with a multiform glioblastoma]. / Analyse de l'impact des résultats du séquençage de nouvelle génération chez les patients atteints de glioblastome.

PURPOSE: Although some genetic alterations in glioblastoma (GBM) have been characterized, the prognostic value of these gene mutations is not yet established in patients treated with standard therapy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 40 patients with newly diagnosed GBM, treated between July 2017 and December 2019, and who had genomic analysis were analyzed. Next-generation sequencing techniques (NGS) were used with a panel of 26 genes. Patients were grouped according to MGMT status, the presence or absence of at least one mutated gene on the panel, and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: the median follow-up was 11.5 months (1.0-37). For all patients, the median duration of progression-free survival was 8 months (95% CI, 5.3-10.7) and the median overall survival (OS) was 17 months (95% CI, 7.5-26.5). Progression-free and overall survival were significantly different according to MGMT status but not according to NGS and p53 status. Three groups of patients according to different combined status could be distinguished due to significant differences in overall survival. CONCLUSION: we have shown that the presence of MGMT promoter methylation is a good prognostic factor. By grouping the patients according to their MGMT, NGS and p53 status, three groups of patients could be separated according to their overall survival. However, these results must be confirmed on a larger number of patients.

Clinical outcome after CyberKnife® radiosurgery re-irradiation for recurrent brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to elucidate the impact on clinical outcomes resulting from re-irradiation for locally recurrent (LR) brain metastases (BM) using CyberKnife® stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with 254 LR BM lesions treated using SRS re-irradiation between January 2014 and December 2018 were analysed in this retrospective study. The local control (LC), overall survival (OS) rates, and adverse events were assessed. The adverse events were classified according to the Common terminology for adverse event (CTCAE) v5.0. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 8.9 months. The median age of the patients was 55 years (IQR: 47-62). The 3, 6, and 9-month LC and OS rates were 92.2%, 73.4%, and 73.4% and 79.2%, 61.0%, and 48.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis the gender (male vs. female; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.06-3.01; P=0.028), type of first brain radiation (WBI vs. SRS) followed by re-irradiation using SRS (HR, 9.32; 95% CI, 2.77-15.27; P<0.001) tumour volume (>12cc vs. ≤12cc; HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.10-3.11; P=0.02), and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) (I vs. II & III; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.70; P=0.001) were independent predictive factor for OS. Radionecrosis was reported in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: With acceptable toxicity, SRS re-irradiation for LR BM showed a favourable rate for LC and OS and reported better OS for the female gender, a patient undergoing first brain radiation with SRS, tumour volume ≤12cc, and RPA-I. This result needs to be further evaluated in future clinical studies.

[What is the place of surgery in the management of brain metastases in 2020?] / Quelle est la place de la chirurgie dans la prise en charge des métastases cérébrales en 2020 ?

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and are associated with a dismal prognosis. The management of patients with brain metastases has become more important because of the increased incidence of these tumours, the better treatment of the systemic disease and the improvement of surgical techniques. The treatment requires multidisciplinary approaches and become complex because of new emerging systemic therapy and advancements in neurosurgery and radiation oncology. The surgical treatment has an indispensable role to obtain a tissue diagnosis, in relieving intracranial effect mass and improving neurological status by improving induced encephalopathy. An understanding of the role and indications of the surgery in patients with metastatic brain lesions is essential for the effective management of this growing population.

[Does orbital exenteration still has a place in 2019?] / L'exentération orbitaire a-t-elle encore sa place en 2019 ?

INTRODUCTION: Orbital exenteration is a radical anatomically and psychologically disfiguring procedure. It is mostly performed for management of orbital cancers or cancers with orbital involvement. The lack of benefit in terms of overall survival and the development of new molecular therapies (targeted therapies, immunotherapy) in recent years leads us to question its use. The goal of our review is to answer to the following question: is orbital exenteration a viable procedure in 2019? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed using the PUBMED and MEDLINE databases. The following terms were used then crossed with each other: "orbital exenteration", "exenterated socket", "overall survival", "life expectancy", "orbital reconstruction", "socket reconstruction". Oncology articles from the past 15 years were included and separated into those in the oculoplastic literature and those in the ENT literature. RESULTS: Nineteen articles were included in this review. Eyelid tumours represent the main etiology of orbital exenteration. Basal cell carcinoma is the most frequently incriminated tumor, while sebaceous carcinoma and conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma are the most frequently encountered in Asian series. Non-conservative orbital exenteration is the most prevalent surgery performed. Orbital reconstruction depends on the surgeon's speciality: healing by secondary intention and split thickness skin grafts are mostly performed by oculoplastic surgeons, whereas regional or free flaps are mostly performed by ENT surgeons. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage is the most common intraoperative complication, encountered in 0 to 13 % of cases. The most common postoperative complications are ethmoid fistula and infection of the operative site, encountered in 0 to 50 % and 0 to 43 % of cases respectively. Orbital exenteration allows surgical resection of R0 tumors in 42.5 % to 97 % of cases. Overall survival following orbital exenteration is 83 % (50.5-97) and 65 % (37-92) at 1 and 5 years respectively. Identified risk factors for poor overall survival are: age, tumor histology (worse prognosis with choroidal melanoma, better prognosis with basal cell carcinoma), non-R0 surgical resection, locally advanced tumors (size>20mm, BCVA<20/400 and the presence of metastases at diagnosis). Recent studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes when managing locally advanced basal cell carcinoma, lacrimal gland cancer and conjunctival melanoma with targeted therapies or immunotherapies without performing orbital exenteration. CONCLUSION: Orbital exenteration remains a major part of our therapeutic arsenal. Although orbital exenteration has failed to demonstrate any overall survival benefit, it allows satisfactory local control of the disease with an increasingly less invasive procedure. The development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies may change our therapeutic decisions in the future.

[Physical activity after breast cancer diagnosis and survival: A systematic review]. / Activité physique après diagnostic de cancer du sein et survie : revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: The benefits of physical activity (PA) in breast cancer are currently recognized in primary prevention. The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and then the National Cancer Institute (INCa) have reported conflicting results regarding the impact of post-diagnosis PA on breast cancer outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the association between PA after breast cancer diagnosis and overall mortality, specific mortality and risk of breast cancer recurrence in the literature. METHODS: Randomized trials, prospective cohorts and meta-analyses studying post-diagnosis PA and overall mortality, breast cancer mortality or risk of recurrence after breast cancer published between January 1, 2014 and October 1, 2019 were included. The articles selected by the INCa report prior to 2014 were included in the literature review. RESULTS: Eighteen articles have been selected. Studies unanimously concluded that overall mortality was reduced by post-diagnosis PA practice. For specific mortality, 5 meta-analyses showed a significant decrease in breast cancer mortality and 2 found a decrease in the risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Post-diagnosis PA reduces overall mortality and appears to impact specific breast cancer mortality and risk of recurrence. However, these results need to be confirmed by larger randomized trials.

[Acceptability and effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with melanoma]. / Acceptabilité et efficacité des immunothérapies dans le traitement du mélanome.

The immunotherapies known as "inhibitors of checkpoint" (ICP) are monoclonal antibodies used since 2010 and have dramatically modified the management of the advanced or metastatic melanomas. By reactivating the anti-tumoral immune response, these antibodies can activate the immune system in all the tissues with a risk to induce immune related adverse events (IrAE). Thus, the adverse effect's profile of ICP is considered as very different from that usually associated with conventional chemotherapies. The objectives of our retrospective monocentric study were the evaluation of the real life's safety and efficiency of the ipilimumab and the pembrolizumab in patients with an advanced melanoma. Seventy-two patients treated by ipilimumab and\or pembrolizumab between August 1st, 2008 and December 31st, 2016 were investigated. The main IrAE occurring involved the gastro- intestinal, skin, and the endocrine systems. The average onset time of IrAE was 39, 104 and 68 days, respectively and their respective duration was of 67, 50 and 111 days. There were 13 events of grade III and IV along with one death. The overall survival was 5 months for the patients treated in monotherapy with ipilimumab, and 14 months for those treated by pembrolizumab. Our real life's study tends to confirm the current safety profile of ICP treatment. Moreover and according to our analyses, the drug sequence seems to have a global survival impact.

[Venous thromboembolism and pancreatic cancer]. / Maladie thromboembolique veineuse et cancer du pancréas.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a devastating malignancy with an overall 5-year survival of 8% for all stages combined. Most of the PC patients diagnosed have an advanced disease (40%) or metastatic stage (40%), which eliminates surgery as a potentially curative treatment. The disease course is often complicated by venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, which per se account for significant morbidity and mortality, with significantly worsen survival. PC is associated with the highest risk of VTE among all cancer patients. We review the literature data to address the incidence and clinical outcomes of VTE in PC patients. VTE incidence varies from 5 to 41% according to epidemiological studies and is as high as 57% in postmortem series. Since 2013, international clinical practice guidelines recommend primary thromboprophylaxis with a grade 1B level of evidence as an adjuvant therapy in advanced PC. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating the benefit and risk of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) in ambulatory advanced PC patients under chemotherapy showed that the incidence of VTE was 2.1% in patients treated with LMWH and 11.2% in controls (risk ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.083-0.39; P<0.0001). In conclusion, improved earlier diagnosis and effective management of VTE, a frequent and life-threatening complication in PC, is warranted to improve PC patient outcomes.

Pretreatment blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is associated with metastasis and predicts survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of systemic inflammatory markers has been explored in various types of cancer. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the association between pretreatment neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and tumor metastasis in pancreatic cancer, and the values of NLR as a prognostic factor of overall survival. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data from 256 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients were analyzed retrospectively. The NLR was recorded before treatment and analyzed along with clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that pretreatment NLR (HR: 2.393; 95% CI: 1.326-4.320; P=0.004) was an independent risk factor for distant metastasis. Furthermore, COX regression analysis showed that in addition to pretreatment NLR (HR: 1.871; 95% CI: 1.413-2.477; P<0.001), metastasis and stage were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment NLR values were significantly associated with distant metastasis in pancreatic cancer patients. Higher NLR values were detected in metastatic disease and may be an independent prognostic factor of overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients.

[Not Available]. / Quelles exigences pour qu'un biomarqueur puisse être un critère de substitution acceptable ?

HOW A BIOMARKER CAN BECOME AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTION CRITERIA ?: Numerous biomarkers of the treatment activity are now available as a result of the fascinating progresses in biology and biotechnology. Together with the rapidly growing understanding of the mechanisms of action of new agents, these biomarkers provide promising tools to evaluate early the effect of treatments against cancer. It is tempting to use these new markers of activity as primary endpoints to evaluate new treatments in the context of randomized clinical trials. Nevertheless, a mandatory preliminary step is to demonstrate that the two endpoints carry the same information in order to validate whether the biomarker is a surrogate of the final endpoint. We illustrate on several examples in prostate, gastric and early breast cancer that it is important to distinguish two levels of information: the individual level that allows to monitor a patient to anticipate treatment failure, and the trial level that enables to predict the treatment effect on the final endpoint based on the treatment effect measured on the surrogate endpoint. In several cases, the formal validation turned out to be disappointing despite strong biological rational.

Correlation between overall survival and other endpoints in metastatic breast cancer with second- or third-line chemotherapy: Literature-based analysis of 24 randomized trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Correlations between overall survival (OS) and other endpoints have been evaluated in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who received first-line chemotherapy. However, no corresponding analysis has been accomplished for patients who have undergone second- or third-line chemotherapy. METHODS: We evaluated the potential of progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (ORR) as surrogates of OS when OS data were not available. Correlations were evaluated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) and weighted linear regression model. Subgroup analyses were performed for previous chemotherapy, regimen, study endpoint, study period and HER2 status. RESULTS: Twenty-four randomized trials involving 8617 patients were included for analysis. The correlation between PFS/TTP and OS was 0.7824 (95% CI: 0.6034-0.8702), whereas ORR did not strongly correlate with OS (rs=0.5398, 95%CI: 0.2942-0.7233). Further, the association between hazard ratios (HRs) of PFS/TTP and OS of the 22 randomized studies showed a moderate correlation (rs=0.5725, 95%CI: 0.1735-0.8277); the slope of the regression model (ß) was 0.5366 (95%CI: 0.3479-0.7253). In particular, the PFS/OS correlation for HER2-positive MBC patients was stronger (rs=0.9515, 95%CI: 0.7009-1.0000; ß=0.8728, 95%CI: 0.0795-1.6661). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PFS/TTP is a useful early endpoint for patients with MBC who have undergone second- or third-line chemotherapy, especially for those who are HER2-positive.

[Polymorphism in HLA and KIR genes and the impact on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes and unrelated donor selection: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]. / Polymorphisme des gènes HLA et KIR et l'impact sur le devenir de la greffe et le choix du donneur non apparenté de cellules souche hématopoïétiques : recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC).

In an attempt to harmonize clinical practices among French hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers, the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) held its sixth annual workshop series in September 2015 in Lille. This event brought together practitioners from across the country with the purpose of offering careful analysis of published studies on clinical practice issues that remain to be disputed. This article addresses the impact of HLA and KIR gene polymorphism on the outcome of the transplantation in order to optimize unrelated donor selection.

Toxicity and efficacy of cetuximab associated with several modalities of IMRT for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has shown its interest for head and neck cancer treatment. In parallel, cetuximab has demonstrated its superiority against exclusive radiotherapy. The objective of this study was to assess the acute toxicity, local control and overall survival of cetuximab associated with different IMRT modalities compared to platinum-based chemotherapy and IMRT in the ARTORL study (NCT02024035). PATIENTS AND METHOD: This prospective, multicenter study included patients with epidermoid or undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma, epidermoid carcinoma of oropharynx and oral cavity (T1-T4, M0, N0-N3). Acute toxicity, local control and overall survival were compared between groups (patients receiving cetuximab or not). Propensity score analysis at the ratio 1:1 was undertaken in an effort to adjust for potential bias between groups due to non-randomization. RESULTS: From the 180 patients included in the ARTORL study, 29 patients receiving cetuximab and 29 patients treated without cetuximab were matched for the analysis. Ten patients (34.5%) reported acute dermal toxicity of grade 3 in the cetuximab group versus three (10.3%) in the non-cetuximab group obtained after matching (P=0.0275). Cetuximab was not significantly associated with more grade 3 mucositis (P=0.2563). There were no significant differences in cutaneous or oral toxicity for patients treated with cetuximab between the different IMRT modalities (P=1.000 and P=0.5731, respectively). There was no significant difference in local relapse-free survival (P=0.0920) or overall survival (P=0.4575) between patients treated with or without cetuximab. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with cetuximab had more cutaneous toxicities, but oral toxicity was similar between groups. The different IMRT modalities did not induce different toxicity profiles.

[Use of maintenance therapy and complete discontinuation for therapeutic management of non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer]. / Place des traitements d'entretien et de la pause thérapeutique complète dans la prise en charge des cancers colorectaux métastatiques non résécables.

Management of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer dramatically changed over the past 20 years. News standards of care combine cytotoxic drugs like fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, with targeted therapies such as anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and anti-angiogenic agents. Survival benefit results from these new options but correlates with more exposure to chemotherapy and cumulative toxicities. The main concern for these patients remains to find the optimal balance between efficacy, toxicity and quality of life. This article reviewed the main studies designed to evaluate the concept of maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy and discontinuation strategy. Available therapeutic standards and options to shorten duration of chemotherapy and reduce toxicities are reported and discussed.