T cell immunotherapies engage neutrophils to eliminate tumor antigen escape variants.

Cancer immunotherapies, including adoptive T cell transfer, can be ineffective because tumors evolve to display antigen-loss-variant clones. Therapies that activate multiple branches of the immune system may eliminate escape variants. Here, we show that melanoma-specific CD4+ T cell therapy in combination with OX40 co-stimulation or CTLA-4 blockade can eradicate melanomas containing antigen escape variants. As expected, early on-target recognition of melanoma antigens by tumor-specific CD4+ T cells was required. Surprisingly, complete tumor eradication was dependent on neutrophils and partly dependent on inducible nitric oxide synthase. In support of these findings, extensive neutrophil activation was observed in mouse tumors and in biopsies of melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade. Transcriptomic and flow cytometry analyses revealed a distinct anti-tumorigenic neutrophil subset present in treated mice. Our findings uncover an interplay between T cells mediating the initial anti-tumor immune response and neutrophils mediating the destruction of tumor antigen loss variants.

Economic Evaluations of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to systematically review evidence on the cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for patients with cancer. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched in October 2022 and updated in September 2023. Systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and economic evaluations that compared costs and effects of CAR-T therapy in patients with cancer were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, synthesized results, and critically appraised studies using the Philips checklist. Cost data were presented in 2022 US dollars. RESULTS: Our search yielded 1809 records, 47 of which were included. Most of included studies were cost-utility analysis, published between 2018 and 2023, and conducted in the United States. Tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, idecabtagene vicleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel, and relmacabtagene autoleucel were compared with various standard of care chemotherapies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for CAR-T therapies ranged from $9424 to $4 124 105 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in adults and from $20 784 to $243 177 per QALY in pediatric patients. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were found to improve over longer time horizons or when an earlier cure point was assumed. Most studies failed to meet the Philips checklist due to a lack of head-to-head comparisons and uncertainty surrounding CAR-T costs and curative effects. CONCLUSIONS: CAR-T therapies were more expensive and generated more QALYs than comparators, but their cost-effectiveness was uncertain and dependent on patient population, cancer type, and model assumptions. This highlights the need for more nuanced economic evaluations and continued research to better understand the value of CAR-T therapies in diverse patient populations.

A Comprehensive ddPCR Strategy for Sensitive and Reliable Monitoring of CAR-T Cell Kinetics in Clinical Applications.

In this study, we present the design, implementation, and successful use of digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for the monitoring of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) expansion in patients with B-cell malignancies treated with different CAR-T products at our clinical center. Initially, we designed a specific and highly sensitive ddPCR assay targeting the junction between the 4-1BB and CD3ζ domains of tisa-cel, normalized with RPP30, and validated it using blood samples from the first tisa-cel-treated patient in Switzerland. We further compared this assay with a published qPCR (quantitative real-time PCR) design. Both assays showed reliable quantification of CAR-T copies down to 20 copies/µg DNA. The reproducibility and precision were confirmed through extensive testing and inter-laboratory comparisons. With the introduction of other CAR-T products, we also developed a corresponding ddPCR assay targeting axi-cel and brexu-cel, demonstrating high specificity and sensitivity with a limit of detection of 20 copies/µg DNA. These assays are suitable for CAR-T copy number quantification across multiple sample types, including peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node biopsy material, showing robust performance and indicating the presence of CAR-T cells not only in the blood but also in target tissues. Longitudinal monitoring of CAR-T cell kinetics in 141 patients treated with tisa-cel, axi-cel, or brexu-cel revealed significant expansion and long-term persistence. Peak expansion correlated with clinical outcomes and adverse effects, as is now well known. Additionally, we quantified the CAR-T mRNA expression, showing a high correlation with DNA copy numbers and confirming active transgene expression. Our results highlight the quality of ddPCR for CAR-T monitoring, providing a sensitive, precise, and reproducible method suitable for clinical applications. This approach can be adapted for future CAR-T products and will support the monitoring and the management of CAR-T cell therapies.

The Current Landscape of Secondary Malignancies after CAR T-Cell Therapies: How Could Malignancies Be Prevented?

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have revolutionised the field of haematological malignancies by achieving impressive remission rates in patients with highly refractory haematological malignancies, improving overall survival. To date, six commercial anti-CD19 and anti-BCMA CAR T-cell products have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell haematological malignancies and multiple myeloma. The indications for CAR T-cell therapies are gradually expanding, with these therapies being investigated in a variety of diseases, including non-malignant ones. Despite the great success, there are several challenges surrounding CAR T-cell therapies, such as non-durable responses and high-grade toxicities. In addition, a new safety concern was added by the FDA on 28 November 2023 following reports of T-cell malignancies in patients previously treated with either anti-CD19 or anti-BCMA autologous CAR T-cell therapies both in clinical trials and in the real-world setting. Since then, several reports have been published presenting the incidence and analysing the risks of other secondary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapies. In this opinion article, the current landscape of secondary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapies is presented, along with a proposed strategy for future research aiming at potentially diminishing or abrogating the risk of developing secondary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapies.

Impact of ARID1A and TP53 mutations in pediatric refractory or relapsed mature B-Cell lymphoma treated with CAR-T cell therapy.

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been used to treat pediatric refractory or relapsed mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r MB-NHL) with significantly improved outcomes, but a proportion of patients display no response or experience relapse after treatment. To investigate whether tumor-intrinsic somatic genetic alterations have an impact on CAR-T cell treatment, the genetic features and treatment outcomes of 89 children with MB-NHL were analyzed. METHODS: 89 pediatric patients treated at multiple clinical centers of the China Net Childhood Lymphoma (CNCL) were included in this study. Targeted next-generation sequencing for a panel of lymphoma-related genes was performed on tumor samples. Survival rates and relapse by genetic features and clinical factors were analyzed. Survival curves were calculated using a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. The Wilcox sum-rank test and Fisher's exact test were applied to test for group differences. RESULTS: A total of 89 driver genes with somatic mutations were identified. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (66%), ID3 (55%), and ARID1A (31%). The incidence of ARID1A mutation and co-mutation of TP53 and ARID1A was high in patients with r/r MB-NHL (P = 0.006; P = 0.018, respectively). CAR-T cell treatment significantly improved survival in r/r MB-NHL patients (P = 0.00081), but patients with ARID1A or ARID1A and TP53 co-mutation had poor survival compared to those without such mutations. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that children with MB-NHL harboring ARID1A or TP53 and ARID1A co-mutation are insensitive to initial conventional chemotherapy and subsequent CAR-T cell treatment. Examination of ARID1A and TP53 mutation status at baseline might have prognostic value, and risk-adapted or more effective therapies should be considered for patients with these high-risk genetic alterations.

Complete spectrum of adverse events associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have been approved by FDA to treat relapsed or refractory hematological malignancies. However, the adverse effects of CAR-T cell therapies are complex and can be challenging to diagnose and treat. In this review, we summarize the major adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR T-cell associated HLH (carHLH), and discuss their pathophysiology, symptoms, grading, and diagnosis systems, as well as management. In a future outlook, we also provide an overview of measures and modifications to CAR-T cells that are currently being explored to limit toxicity.

Myxoid Liposarcomas: Systemic Treatment Options.

OPINION STATEMENT: Myxoid/round-cell liposarcoma (MRCL) account for 30% of liposarcomas and are the most chemo-sensitive subtype of liposarcoma. The 5-year local relapse and distant metastasis rates are 10% and 20%, respectively. In the advanced setting, the first-line median progression-free survival and overall survival is 9 and 30 months, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST with anthracycline-based chemotherapy is around 40% and with trabectedin is 20%, although response is higher when captured by CHOI criteria. Anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy regimens remain the standard of care first-line treatment option. However, trabectedin is also effective and may be considered in the first-line setting when anthracyclines cannot be prescribed. Beyond chemotherapy, new therapeutic classes are being developed, including autologous adoptive modified T cell receptor cellular therapies which have shown promising results thus far. These new therapies utilize the immunogenic potential of cancer testis antigens, NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4, which are expressed in the vast majority of MRCL. Early phase trials have shown encouraging results with up to 40% ORR and a median progression-free survival up to 8.7 months. Other innovative strategies are being developed, tailored to the molecular biology of MRCL. This review summarizes current evidence for the use of standard chemotherapy and the new biomarker-selected treatments under development.

Development of Cancer Immunotherapies.

Cancer immunotherapy, or the utilization of components of the immune system to target and eliminate cancer, has become a highly active area of research in the past several decades and a common treatment strategy for several cancer types. The concept of harnessing the immune system for this purpose originated over 100 years ago when a physician by the name of William Coley successfully treated several of his cancer patients with a combination of live and attenuated bacteria, later known as "Coley's Toxins", after observing a subset of prior patients enter remission following their diagnosis with the common bacterial infection, erysipelas. However, it was not until late in the twentieth century that cancer immunotherapies were developed for widespread use, thereby transforming the treatment landscape of numerous cancer types. Pivotal studies elucidating molecular and cellular functions of immune cells, such as the discovery of IL-2 and production of monoclonal antibodies, fostered the development of novel techniques for studying the immune system and ultimately the development and approval of several cancer immunotherapies by the United States Food and Drug Association in the 1980s and 1990s, including the tuberculosis vaccine-Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, IL-2, and the CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody. Approval of the first therapeutic cancer vaccine, Sipuleucel-T, for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and the groundbreaking success and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in the last decade, have driven an explosion of interest in and pursuit of novel cancer immunotherapy strategies. A broad range of modalities ranging from antibodies to adoptive T cell therapies is under investigation for the generalized treatment of a broad spectrum of cancers as well as personalized medicine. This chapter will focus on the recent advances, current strategies, and future outlook of immunotherapy development for the treatment of cancer.

Value of Reducing Wait Times for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trial Data on Tisagenlecleucel for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantify the value of reducing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatment wait times on patients with refractory and relapsed aggressive blood cancer who can newly gain access to treatment or access treatment earlier in their disease course. METHODS: Using data from the JULIET clinical trial, we first identified the number of additional patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that would have been treated with tisagenlecleucel CAR-T therapy if wait times were shortened. For these patients, we estimated mortality benefits using literature estimates of CAR-T effectiveness. Next, among patients who already received CAR-T, we estimated tumor burden progression over time using a linear probability regression model. The primary outcome variable was an indicator for having above-normal lactate dehydrogenase, and we controlled for time, use of bridging therapy, and time-invariant patient characteristics. The regression results, along with literature estimates relating lactate dehydrogenase to CAR-T effectiveness, were used to compute the survival benefits of earlier CAR-T treatment. RESULTS: Reducing wait times by 2 months increased the number of eligible patients receiving CAR-T by at least 10.7%. For patients already receiving tisagenlecleucel CAR-T, a 2-month reduction in wait times generated a 3.3% increase in survival gains per treated patient. Thus, among patients seeking treatment, the combined treatment efficacy increased by 14%, with approximately one-quarter of survival benefits accruing to existing patients receiving faster treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Delays affected not only access to CAR-T treatments but also treatment effectiveness. Our results highlight the survival benefits of expediting treatment access and may help explain some observed differences in CAR-T effectiveness across countries.

Joining Forces for Cancer Treatment: From "TCR versus CAR" to "TCR and CAR".

T cell-based immunotherapy has demonstrated great therapeutic potential in recent decades, on the one hand, by using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and, on the other hand, by engineering T cells to obtain anti-tumor specificities through the introduction of either engineered T cell receptors (TCRs) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). Given the distinct design of both receptors and the type of antigen that is encountered, the requirements for proper antigen engagement and downstream signal transduction by TCRs and CARs differ. Synapse formation and signal transduction of CAR T cells, despite further refinement of CAR T cell designs, still do not fully recapitulate that of TCR T cells and might limit CAR T cell persistence and functionality. Thus, deep knowledge about the molecular differences in CAR and TCR T cell signaling would greatly advance the further optimization of CAR designs and elucidate under which circumstances a combination of both receptors would improve the functionality of T cells for cancer treatment. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review about similarities and differences by directly comparing the architecture, synapse formation and signaling of TCRs and CARs, highlighting the knowns and unknowns. In the second part of the review, we discuss the current status of combining CAR and TCR technologies, encouraging a change in perspective from "TCR versus CAR" to "TCR and CAR".

Neurological Immunotoxicity from Cancer Treatment.

The emergence of immune-based treatments for cancer has led to a growing field dedicated to understanding and managing iatrogenic immunotoxicities that arise from these agents. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can develop as isolated events or as toxicities affecting multiple body systems. In particular, this review details the neurological irAEs from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapies. The recognition and treatment of neurological irAEs has variable success, depending on the severity and nature of the neurological involvement. Understanding the involved mechanisms, predicting those at higher risk for irAEs, and establishing safety parameters for resuming cancer immunotherapies after irAEs are all important fields of ongoing research.

Servier in oncology: bringing innovation to patients.

Interview conducted with Claude P Bertrand, PharmD, PhD, Executive Vice President of Servier Research and Development, Chief Scientific Officer, Servier, France. Claude Bertrand speaks to Roshaine Wijayatunga, Senior Editor: Oncology. Dr Claude Bertrand graduated in pharmacy (PharmD) from Strasbourg University, France, and obtained his PhD in Strasbourg with research in the fields of immunopharmacology and neurogenic inflammation. After a 2-year postdoctoral appointment at the University of California, San Francisco, USA, Claude joined the allergy and asthma unit at Ciba-Geigy (later Novartis) in Basel, Switzerland. In 1996, he moved to the Inflammatory Disease Unit at Roche Bioscience, CA, USA, where he became the head of the in vivo pharmacology group and was responsible for supporting projects in rheumatology and respiratory diseases. In 1999, he was recruited as Director of Biology for Inflammation, GI and Pain at Parke-Davies, which later became part of Pfizer where he headed drug discovery. In 2004, Dr Bertrand joined AstraZeneca as Vice President of Discovery for Respiratory and Inflammation Research at Alderley Park, UK, and, in 2005, he was appointed Global Senior Vice President for Respiratory and Inflammation Research Area overseeing research and development activities at three sites in the UK and Sweden. In 2009, Dr Bertrand joined Ipsen, France, as Executive Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer, and from June 2011 was the Executive Vice President for Research and Development, Chief Scientific Officer with a focus on oncology, neurology and endocrinology. In March 2017, he was appointed General Director R&D, Chief Scientific Officer at Servier and has recently been promoted to Executive Vice President R&D. As such, he joined the Executive Committee on 1 November 2018. Claude sits on the Board of Directors of Eclosion2 and ABIVAX, and is also part of the Scientific Advisory Board of MEDALIS. He was the President of ARIIS from 2011 to 2016. Since 2014, he has been on the Board of Hcéres. Claude has published more than 70 papers in peer-reviewed journals, authored 20 chapters and presented more than 100 communications at scientific meetings. Since 1996, he has been a visiting lecturer for PhD student programs at universities in London, Strasbourg, Nancy, Rennes, Orléans and Paris.

Targeting B-cell maturation antigen for treatment and monitoring of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: a comprehensive review.

Despite major therapeutic advancements in recent years, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease with nearly all patients experiencing relapsed and refractory disease over the course of treatment. Extending the duration and durability of clinical responses will necessitate the development of therapeutics with novel targets that are capable of robustly and specifically eliminating myeloma cells. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a membrane-bound protein expressed predominantly on malignant plasma cells and has recently been the target of several novel therapeutics to treat MM patients. This review will focus on recently approved and currently in development agents that target this protein, including bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. In addition, this protein also serves as a novel serum biomarker to predict outcomes and monitor disease status for MM patients; the studies demonstrating this use of BCMA will be discussed in detail.

Availability and financing of CAR-T cell therapies: A cross-country comparative analysis.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-T therapies) are a type of advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) that belong to a new generation of personalised cancer immunotherapies. This paper compares the approval, availability and financing of CAR-T cell therapies in ten countries. It also examines the implementation of this type of ATMP within the health care system, describing the organizational elements of CAR-T therapy delivery and the challenges of ensuring equitable access to all those in need, taking a more systems-oriented view. It finds that the availability of CAR-T therapies varies across countries, reflecting the heterogeneity in the organization and financing of specialised care, particularly oncology care. Countries have been cautious in designing reimbursement models for CAR-T cell therapies, establishing limited managed entry arrangements under public payers, either based on outcomes or as an evidence development scheme to allow for the study of real-world therapeutic efficacy. The delivery model of CAR-T therapies is concentrated around existing experienced cancer centres and highlights the need for high networking and referral capacity. Some countries have transparent and systematic eligibility criteria to help ensure more equitable access to therapies. Overall, as with other pharmaceuticals, there is limited transparency in pricing, eligibility criteria and budgeting decisions in this therapeutic area.

Immunotherapy for glioblastoma: current state, challenges, and future perspectives.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and lethal type of brain tumor in human adults. The standard of care offers minimal clinical benefit, and most GBM patients experience tumor recurrence after treatment. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the development of novel immunotherapies or other therapeutic strategies that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in many advanced cancers. However, the benefit of immune-based treatments in GBM is limited because of the unique brain immune profiles, GBM cell heterogeneity, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we present a detailed overview of current immunotherapeutic strategies and discuss the challenges and potential molecular mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance in GBM. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth discussion regarding the strategies that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in GBM, which will likely require combination therapies.

TACTUM: Trends in Access to Cellular Therapies in Multiple Myeloma, Perspectives of Treating Versus Referring Physicians.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) and bispecific T cell engagers (TCE) for multiple myeloma (MM) are readily available at many large US medical centers. However, many potentially eligible patients may not be referred to the specialized centers administering these therapies. Perspectives regarding potential barriers for MM cellular therapy from referring-center oncologists (ROs) versus treating-center oncologists (TOs) have not been reported previously. We conducted TACTUM-23, a survey of US oncologists who treat MM, to identify perceived barriers to these cellular therapies. This 24-question survey, which focused on demographics and perceived barriers to CAR-T and TCE, was conducted between June and August 2023. Of 247 oncologists, 37 (15%) completed the survey including 26 (70%) TOs who prescribed both CAR-T and TCEs, 4 (11%) TOs who only prescribed TCEs, and 7 (19%) ROs who referred patients. The top RO-stated barrier to CAR-T was financial toxicity, while the top TO-stated barrier to CAR-T was leukapheresis/ manufacturing slot availability. The top RO-stated barrier to TCE was financial toxicity, while the top TO-stated barrier to TCE was the hospitalization requirement. In conclusion, financial concerns are perceived by ROs to be the top barrier to both CAR-T and TCEs in myeloma. In contrast, TOs perceive logistical concerns to be the top barrier. Interventions to lower financial toxicity during these therapies, and outreach to raise awareness of such interventions among ROs, are needed alongside strategies to streamline manufacturing (for CAR-T) and monitoring.

The electrostatic landscape of MHC-peptide binding revealed using inception networks.

Predictive modeling of macromolecular recognition and protein-protein complementarity represents one of the cornerstones of biophysical sciences. However, such models are often hindered by the combinatorial complexity of interactions at the molecular interfaces. Exemplary of this problem is peptide presentation by the highly polymorphic major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecule, a principal component of immune recognition. We developed human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-Inception, a deep biophysical convolutional neural network, which integrates molecular electrostatics to capture non-bonded interactions for predicting peptide binding motifs across 5,821 MHC-I alleles. These predictions of generated motifs correlate strongly with experimental peptide binding and presentation data. Beyond molecular interactions, the study demonstrates the application of predicted motifs in analyzing MHC-I allele associations with HIV disease progression and patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.

Immunotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Anti-PD1/PDL1 and Beyond.

Sarcomas gather a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal malignant tumors including more than 150 different subtypes. Most of them represent aggressive tumors with poor prognosis at the advanced stage, despite the better molecular characterization of these tumors and the development of molecular-driven therapeutic strategies. During the last decade, immunotherapy has been developed to treat advanced cancers, mainly thanks to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as anti-PD1/PDL1 and later to adoptive immune cell therapies. In this review, we aim to summarize the state of the art of immunotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Overall, the clinical trials of ICI that included a wide diversity of STS subtypes reported limited efficacy with some outlying responders. Both emerging biomarkers are of interest in selecting good candidates and in the development of combination therapies. Finally, the recent breakthroughs of innovative adoptive therapies in STS seem highly promising.

LCL161 enhances expansion and survival of engineered anti-tumor T cells but is restricted by death signaling.

Background: The genesis of SMAC mimetic drugs is founded on the observation that many cancers amplify IAP proteins to facilitate their survival, and therefore removal of these pathways would re-sensitize the cells towards apoptosis. It has become increasingly clear that SMAC mimetics also interface with the immune system in a modulatory manner. Suppression of IAP function by SMAC mimetics activates the non-canonical NF-κB pathway which can augment T cell function, opening the possibility of using SMAC mimetics to enhance immunotherapeutics. Methods: We have investigated the SMAC mimetic LCL161, which promotes degradation of cIAP-1 and cIAP-2, as an agent for delivering transient costimulation to engineered BMCA-specific human TAC T cells. In doing so we also sought to understand the cellular and molecular effects of LCL161 on T cell biology. Results: LCL161 activated the non-canonical NF-κB pathway and enhanced antigen-driven TAC T cell proliferation and survival. Transcriptional profiling from TAC T cells treated with LCL161 revealed differential expression of costimulatory and apoptosis-related proteins, namely CD30 and FAIM3. We hypothesized that regulation of these genes by LCL161 may influence the drug's effects on T cells. We reversed the differential expression through genetic engineering and observed impaired costimulation by LCL161, particularly when CD30 was deleted. While LCL161 can provide a costimulatory signal to TAC T cells following exposure to isolated antigen, we did not observe a similar pattern when TAC T cells were stimulated with myeloma cells expressing the target antigen. We questioned whether FasL expression by myeloma cells may antagonize the costimulatory effects of LCL161. Fas-KO TAC T cells displayed superior expansion following antigen stimulation in the presence of LCL161, suggesting a role for Fas-related T cell death in limiting the magnitude of the T cell response to antigen in the presence of LCL161. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that LCL161 provides costimulation to TAC T cells exposed to antigen alone, however LCL161 did not enhance TAC T cell anti-tumor function when challenged with myeloma cells and may be limited due to sensitization of T cells towards Fas-mediated apoptosis.

Beyond Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in mantle cell lymphoma: bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, CAR T-cells, and novel agents.

Mantle cell lymphoma is a B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), representing 2-6% of all NHLs and characterized by overexpression of cyclin D1. The last decade has seen the development of many novel treatment approaches in MCL, most notably the class of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). BTKi has shown excellent outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory MCL and is now being studied in the first-line setting. However, patients eventually progress on BTKi due to the development of resistance. Additionally, there is an alteration in the tumor microenvironment in these patients with varying biological and therapeutic implications. Hence, it is necessary to explore novel therapeutic strategies that can be effective in those who progressed on BTKi or potentially circumvent resistance. In this review, we provide a brief overview of BTKi, then discuss the various mechanisms of BTK resistance including the role of genetic alteration, cancer stem cells, tumor microenvironment, and adaptive reprogramming bypassing the effect of BTK inhibition, and then provide a comprehensive review of current and emerging therapeutic options beyond BTKi including novel agents, CAR T cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates.