Banff 2022 Liver Group Meeting report: Monitoring long-term allograft health.

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference.

Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods.

The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.

Association of BKV viremia and nephropathy with adverse alloimmune outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression reduction for BK polyoma virus (BKV) must be balanced against risk of adverse alloimmune outcomes. We sought to characterize risk of alloimmune events after BKV within context of HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch (mMM) risk score. METHODS: This single-center study evaluated 460 kidney transplant patients on tacrolimus-mycophenolate-prednisone from 2010-2021. BKV status was classified at 6-months post-transplant as "BKV" or "no BKV" in landmark analysis. Primary outcome was T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR). Secondary outcomes included all-cause graft failure (ACGF), death-censored graft failure (DCGF), de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA), and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Predictors of outcomes were assessed in Cox proportional hazards models including BKV status and alloimmune risk defined by recipient age and molecular mismatch (RAMM) groups. RESULTS: At 6-months post-transplant, 72 patients had BKV and 388 had no BKV. TCMR occurred in 86 recipients, including 27.8% with BKV and 17% with no BKV (p = .05). TCMR risk was increased in recipients with BKV (HR 1.90, (95% CI 1.14, 3.17); p = .01) and high vs. low-risk RAMM group risk (HR 2.26 (95% CI 1.02, 4.98); p = .02) in multivariable analyses; but not HLA serological MM in sensitivity analysis. Recipients with BKV experienced increased dnDSA in univariable analysis, and there was no association with ABMR, DCGF, or ACGF. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients with BKV had increased risk of TCMR independent of induction immunosuppression and conventional alloimmune risk measures. Recipients with high-risk RAMM experienced increased TCMR risk. Future studies on optimizing immunosuppression for BKV should explore nuanced risk stratification and may consider novel measures of alloimmune risk.

Characteristic changes in blood routine and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in recipients of different types of rejection. / ä¸åŒç±»åž‹æŽ’æ–¥ååº”å—è€ è¡€å¸¸è§„åŠå¤–å‘¨è¡€æ·‹å·´ç»†èƒžäºšç¾¤ç‰¹å¾æ€§å˜åŒ–.

OBJECTIVES: Rejection remains the most important factor limiting the survival of transplanted kidneys. Although a pathological biopsy of the transplanted kidney is the gold standard for diagnosing rejection, its limitations prevent it from being used as a routine monitoring method. Recently, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation testing has become an important means of assessing the body's immune system, however, its application value and strategy in the field of kidney transplantation need further exploration. Additionally, the development and utilization of routine test parameters are also important methods for exploring diagnostic strategies and predictive models for kidney transplant diseases. This study aims to explore the correlation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), as well as their diagnostic value, in conjunction with routine blood tests. METHODS: A total of 154 kidney transplant recipients, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were treated at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January to December, 2021, were selected as the study subjects. They were assigned into a stable group, a TCMR group, and an ABMR group, based on the occurrence and type of rejection. The basic and clinical data of these recipients were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. The transplant kidney function, routine blood tests, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulation data of the TCMR group and the ABMR group before rejection treatment were compared with those of the stable group. RESULTS: The stable, TCMR group, and ABMR group showed no statistically significant differences in immunosuppressive maintenance regimens or sources of transplanted kidneys (all P>0.05). However, the post-transplant duration was significantly longer in the ABMR group compared with the stable group (P<0.001) and the TCMR group (P<0.05). Regarding kidney function, serum creatinine levels in the ABMR group were higher than in the stable group and the TCMR group (both P<0.01), with the TCMR group also showing higher levels than the stable group (P<0.01). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had significantly higher blood urea nitrogen levels than the stable group (P<0.01), with no statistically significant difference between TCMR and ABMR groups (P>0.05). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in both TCMR and ABMR groups compared with the stable group (both P<0.01). In routine blood tests, the ABMR group had lower hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and platelet count than the stable group (all P<0.05). The TCMR group had higher neutrophil percentage (P<0.05) and count (P<0.05) than the stable group, and the ABMR group had a higher neutrophil percentage than the stable group (P<0.05). The eosinophil percentage and count in the TCMR group were lower than in the stable and ABMR groups (all P<0.05). Both TCMR and ABMR groups had lower basophil percentage and count, as well as lower lymphocyte percentage and count, compared with the stable group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in monocyte percentage and count among the 3 groups (all P>0.05). In lymphocyte subpopulations, the TCMR and ABMR groups had lower counts of CD45+ cells and T cells compared with the stable group (all P<0.05). The TCMR group also had lower counts of CD4+ T cells, NK cells, and B cells than the stable group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the T cell percentage, CD4+ T cell percentage, CD8+ T cell percentage and their counts, CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio, NK cell percentage, and B cell percentage among the stable, TCMR, and ABMR groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of rejection leads to impaired transplant kidney function, accompanied by characteristic changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in kidney transplant recipients. The different characteristics of changes in some parameters of routine blood tests and peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations during TCMR and ABMR may help predict and diagnose rejection and differentiate between TCMR and ABMR.

Liver transplantation immunology: Immunosuppression, rejection, and immunomodulation.

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

Polyfunctional donor-reactive T cells are associated with acute T-cell-mediated rejection of the kidney transplant.

Acute T-cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) still remains a clinical problem after kidney transplantation despite significant improvements in immunosuppressive regimens. Polyfunctional T cells, i.e. T cells producing multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines, are believed to be the most relevant T cells in an immune response. The aim of this study was to determine whether polyfunctional donor-reactive T cells are associated with aTCMR. In a case-control study, 49 kidney transplant recipients with a biopsy-proven aTCMR in the first year after transplantation were included, as well as 51 controls without aTCMR. Circulating donor-reactive T cells were identified by the expression of CD137 after short-term co-culture with donor antigen-presenting cells. Polyfunctional donor-reactive T cells were further characterized by dissection into different T-cell subsets encompassing the spectrum of naïve to terminally differentiated effector T cells. Prior to kidney transplantation, proportions of donor-reactive CD4+ (0.03% versus 0.02%; P < 0.01) and CD8+ (0.18% versus 0.10%; P < 0.01) CD137++ T cells were significantly higher in recipients with a biopsy-proven aTCMR versus non-rejectors. Polyfunctionality was higher (P = 0.03) in this subset of CD137-expressing T cells. These cells were predominantly of the EM/EMRA-phenotype, with polyfunctional donor-reactive CD137++CD4+ T cells predominantly co-expressing CD28 whereas approximately half of the polyfunctional CD137++CD8+ T cells co-expressed CD28. In addition, at the time of aTCMR, polyfunctional donor-reactive CD137++ CD4+, but not CD8+, T cells, were specifically decreased by 75% compared to before transplantation in recipients with as well as those without an aTCMR. Prior to transplantation, the proportion of polyfunctional donor-reactive CD137++ T cells is associated with the occurrence of a biopsy-proven aTCMR within the first year after transplantation.

Daratumumab Use Prior to Kidney Transplant and T Cell-Mediated Rejection: A Case Report.

There is growing interest in daratumumab in the solid organ transplant realm owing to the potential immunomodulatory effects on CD38-expressing cells, primarily plasma cells, as they have a key role in antibody production. In particular there is interest in use of daratumumab for desensitization and potential treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. However, ongoing investigation with daratumumab has shown potential immunologic concerns in vitro, with a significant increase in populations of CD4-positive cytotoxic T cells and CD8-positive helper T cells in both peripheral blood and bone marrow that could lead to acute T cell-mediated rejection in the solid organ transplant patient. To date, there are no published reports of an association with daratumumab use and T cell-mediated rejection in vivo. In this case report we present what is to our knowledge the first documented case of an early severe T cell-mediated rejection in a low-immunologic-risk living-donor kidney transplant recipient who received daratumumab for multiple myeloma maintenance prior to transplant.

Association between anti-endothelial antigen antibodies and allograft rejection in kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial cells are vital in the transplant immune system as semiprofessional antigen-presenting cells. Few studies have investigated the importance of anti-endothelin subtype A receptor (ETAR) antibodies in kidney transplantation. Here, we aimed to analyze the association between anti-angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) and anti-ETAR antibodies and the association between the presence of anti-endothelial antibodies and the risk of allograft rejection in kidney transplantation. METHODS: In total, 252 patients who underwent kidney transplantation were enrolled in this study. Antibodies for human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and non-HLAs were analyzed immediately before transplantation. Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) or T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) by 2017 Banff classification. All p-values were two-tailed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Patients with anti-AT1R antibodies had a 3.49-fold higher risk of TCMR than those without anti-AT1R antibodies. Patients with anti-ETAR antibodies had a 5.84-fold higher risk of AMR than those without anti-ETAR antibodies. The hazard ratio of AMR in patients with both HLA DSAs and anti-ETAR antibodies, relative to patients without anti-ETAR antibodies and HLA DSAs, was 32.85 (95% CI = 1.82-592.91). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that anti-ETAR antibodies are associated with AMR, and patients with both anti-ETAR antibodies and de novo HLA DSAs were at a high risk of AMR.

The negative impact of T cell-mediated rejection on renal allograft survival in the modern era.

The prevalence and long-term impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is poorly defined in the modern era of tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based maintenance therapy. This observational study evaluated 775 kidney transplant recipients with serial histology and correlated TCMR events with the risk of graft loss. After a ~30% incidence of a first Banff Borderline or greater TCMR detected on for-cause (17%) or surveillance (13%) biopsies, persistent (37.4%) or subsequent (26.3%) TCMR occurred in 64% of recipients on follow-up biopsies. Alloimmune risk categories based on the HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet molecular mismatch correlated with the number of TCMR events (p = .002) and Banff TCMR grade (p = .007). Both a first and second TCMR event correlated with death-censored and all-cause graft loss when adjusted for baseline covariates and other significant time-dependent covariates such as DGF and ABMR. Therefore, a substantial portion of kidney transplant recipients, especially those with intermediate and high HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch scores, remain under-immunosuppressed, which in turn identifies the need for novel agents that can more effectively prevent or treat TCMR.

Association of Predicted HLA T-Cell Epitope Targets and T-Cell-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The relationship between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatches and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is unknown. We investigated the associations between the different donor HLA-derived T-cell targets and the occurrence of TCMR and borderline histologic changes suggestive of TCMR after kidney transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All kidney transplant recipients at a single center between 2004 and 2013 with available biopsy data and a DNA sample for high-resolution HLA donor/recipient typing (N = 893). EXPOSURE: Scores calculated by the HLA matching algorithm PIRCHE-II and HLA eplet mismatches. OUTCOME: TCMR, borderline changes suggestive of TCMR, and allograft failure. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariable cause-specific hazards models were fit to characterize the association between HLA epitopes targets and study outcomes. RESULTS: We found 277 patients developed TCMR, and 134 developed only borderline changes suggestive of TCMR on at least 1 biopsy. In multivariable analyses, only the PIRCHE-II scores for HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 were independently associated with the occurrence of TCMR and with allograft failure; this was not the case for HLA class I molecules. If restricted to rejection episodes within the first 3 months after transplantation, only the T-cell epitope targets originating from the donor's HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1, but not class I molecules, were associated with the early acute TCMR. Also, the median PIRCHE-II score for HLA class II was statistically different between the patients with TCMR compared to the patients without TCMR (129 [IQR, 60-240] vs 201 [IQR, 96-298], respectively; P < 0.0001). These differences were not observed for class I PIRCHE-II scores. LIMITATIONS: Observational clinical data and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of HLA-DSA, HLA class II but not class I mismatches are associated with early episodes of acute TCMR and allograft failure. This suggests that current immunosuppressive therapies are largely able to abort the most deleterious HLA class I-directed alloimmune processes; however, alloresponses against HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 molecular mismatches remain insufficiently suppressed. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Genetic differences in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex between kidney transplant donors and recipients play a central role in T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), which can lead to failure of the transplanted kidney. Evaluating this genetic disparity (mismatch) in the HLA complex at the molecular (epitope) level could contribute to better prediction of the immune response to the donor organ posttransplantation. We investigated the associations of the different donor HLA-derived T-cell epitope targets and scores obtained from virtual crossmatch algorithms with the occurrence of TCMR, borderline TCMR, and graft failure after kidney transplantation after taking into account the influence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. This study illustrates the greater importance of the molecular mismatches in class II molecules compared to class I HLA molecules.

Kidney Transplant T Cell-Mediated Rejection Occurring After Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy for Refractory Aggressive Burkitt-like Lymphoma With 11q Aberration: A Case Report.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder is a growing complication of kidney transplantation and is associated with a poor prognosis. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an important new treatment option modifying the outcome of refractory hematological cancers. Here, we report the case of a 40-year-old kidney transplant recipient who developed a Burkitt-like lymphoma with 11q aberration 5 years after transplantation. After 3 unsuccessful lines of chemotherapy, it was decided to treat the patient with anti-CD19 CAR T cells as a salvage therapy. Three months after CAR T-cell infusion, she experienced a grade IIB T cell-mediated rejection with severe tubulitis (T3), slight interstitial inflammation (I1), and severe intimal arteritis (V2) with blood suffusion. Among T cells infiltrating the graft, some of them expressed the anti-CD19 CAR. CAR T cells within the graft and in blood samples were also detected by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Function of the kidney transplant improved after corticosteroid treatment and remained stable. However, lymphoma progressed, with a massive pulmonary mass leading to the patient's death 10 months after CAR T-cell infusion.

The impact of methodological choices when developing predictive models using urinary metabolite data.

The continuous evolution of metabolomics over the past two decades has stimulated the search for metabolic biomarkers of many diseases. Metabolomic data measured from urinary samples can provide rich information of the biological events triggered by organ rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. With additional validation, metabolic markers can be used to build clinically useful diagnostic tools. However, there are many methodological steps ranging from data processing to modeling that can influence the performance of the resulting metabolomic classifiers. In this study we focus on the comparison of various classification methods that can handle the complex structure of metabolomic data, including regularized classifiers, partial least squares discriminant analysis, and nonlinear classification models. We also examine the effectiveness of a physiological normalization technique widely used in the clinical and biochemical literature but not extensively analyzed and compared in urine metabolomic studies. While the main objective of this work is to interrogate metabolomic data of pediatric kidney transplant recipients to improve the diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), we also analyze three independent datasets from other disease conditions to investigate the generalizability of our findings.

The combination of exposure to Tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, Inosine 5'-Monophosphate Dehydrogenase activity and inhibition in the first week define early histological outcomes in renal transplant recipients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring is routine for Tacrolimus, while levels are not routinely monitored for mycophenolic acid (MPA). This study investigated the effect of early post-transplant pharmacokinetics (PK) of MPA and Tacrolimus along with the pharmacodynamics (PD) of MPA on biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) after renal transplantation. A prospective PK/PD study with limited sampling (three blood samples) was conducted in renal transplant recipients on week 1, around Day 6 (n = 42) and at the 3rd-month biopsy on Day 90 (n = 23). The partial exposures (area under curve [AUC]0-3.5 h ) of both MPA and Tacrolimus obtained during the first week were more predictive of rejection (combined clinical and subclinical rejection) by Day 90 than their trough concentrations or Day 90 exposures. Patients with rejection had significantly worse renal function (eGFR) and a comparatively lower exposure to MPA during the first post-transplant week. The lower MPA exposure was also associated with sub-optimal inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibition in patients with rejection, and the probability of rejection was higher in the presence of an increased pre-transplant IMPDH activity. A composite of parameters, including MPA exposure and IMPDH activity was found to predict acute rejection and may be beneficial along with tacrolimus monitoring early after renal transplantation.

Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation.

The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability-and ambiguity-in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation.

Evolution of the Definition of Rejection in Kidney Transplantation and Its Use as an Endpoint in Clinical Trials.

This article outlines the evolving definition of rejection following kidney transplantation. The viewpoints and evidence presented were included in documentation prepared for a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), relating to clinical trial endpoints in kidney transplantation. This request was initiated by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) in 2016 and finalized following discussions between the EMA and ESOT in 2020. In ESOT's opinion, the use of "biopsy-proven acute rejection" as an endpoint for clinical trials in kidney transplantation is no longer accurate, although it is still the approved histopathological endpoint. The spectrum of rejection is now divided into the phenotypes of borderline changes, T cell-mediated rejection, and antibody-mediated rejection, with the latter two phenotypes having further subclassifications. Rejection is also described in relation to graft (dys)function, diagnosed because of protocol (surveillance) or indication (for-cause) biopsies. The ongoing use of outdated terminology has become a potential barrier to clinical research in kidney transplantation. This article presents these perspectives and issues, and provides a foundation on which subsequent articles within this Special Issue of Transplant International build.

Dysbiosis and Depletion of Fecal Organic Acids Correlate With the Severity of Rejection After Rat Liver Transplantation.

The impact of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after liver transplantation (LT) on the alterations in the gut microbiota (GM) and associated intestinal environment represented by fecal organic acids (OAs) require further elucidation. A rat allogeneic LT model was prepared without immunosuppressants or antibiotics, and a syngeneic model was used as a control. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of fecal samples at fixed time points were performed. Correlation analyses were also performed between liver function and GMs and OA levels. In the allogeneic TCMR group, the number of predominant obligate anaerobes decreased as liver function declined. Clostridioides difficile, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus were significantly increased. Regarding fecal OA concentration, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were depleted as liver function declined. In contrast, in the syngeneic group, GM and OAs exhibited only slight, transient, and reversible disturbances. In addition, alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin were positively correlated with the number of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus, and negatively correlated with the fecal concentration of SCFAs. The allogeneic TCMR model demonstrated distinct dysbiosis and depletion of fecal OAs as TCMR progressed after LT. The degree of graft injury was closely related to the number of specific bacterial strains and the concentrations of fecal SCFAs.

Hematological and biochemical characteristics and diagnostic imaging results in acute T cell-mediated rejection after pediatric liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing TCMR after LT. However, complications caused by liver biopsy may occur especially during the immediate post-transplantation period and other effective methods for predicting TCMR have not been established. Thus, we investigated whether hematological and biochemical characteristics and Doppler ultrasonography findings are associated with acute TCMR. METHODS: A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors of acute TCMR, defined as a RAI ≥4. Then, a ROC curve analysis was conducted to evaluate for diagnostic performance. The relationship between prognostic factors and each histological category of RAI was investigated. RESULTS: Eighty-nine liver biopsies were performed on 85 patients between January 2012 and December 2019. The RAI of 62 (69.7%) liver biopsies was ≥4. AEC (×104 /µl), direct bilirubin level (mg/dl), and MHVV (cm/s) were found to be associated with acute TCMR (OR: 4.96, 95% CI: 1.44-17.0, p = .011; OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.91, p = .025; OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08, p < .001, respectively). The area under the ROC curves for predicting acute TCMR was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.94). There was a correlation between AEC, direct bilirubin level, and MHVV as well as the severity of RAI. CONCLUSIONS: AEC, direct bilirubin level, and MHVV were the independent risk factors for acute TCMR. This study could provide information regarding the identification of patients requiring liver biopsy.

Treatment of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: A retrospective cohort study of 37 transplants.

AIM: Data on the treatment of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (CA-TCMR) are scarce, and therapeutical strategies for CA-TCMR have not been established. We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes and effects of treatment on pathological and clinical findings in patients with CA-TCMR. METHODS: This study comprised 37 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our institute who were diagnosed with CA-TCMR between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were followed until October 2021. RESULTS: A total of 32 of the 37 patients were treated. During the observation period, two patients died (5%), and five patients developed allograft loss (13%). A univariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that indication biopsy, higher spot urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and Banff ci/ct scores were risk factors for allograft loss. Of the treated patients, 23 underwent follow-up biopsies. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant improvement in the Baff scores for "ti", "i-IFTA", "t" and "t-IFTA" after treatment. On pathology, 13 (57%) of the patients who underwent follow-up biopsy improved to "no evidence of rejection" or "borderline change." Assuming that improvement in pathology to "borderline change" or "no evidence of rejection" on follow-up biopsy indicates response to treatment, multivariate logistic analysis showed that lower UPCR was a predictive factor for response to treatment. No specific effect of treatment type was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that treatment could improve the pathological findings in CA-TCMR.

The Biology and Molecular Basis of Organ Transplant Rejection.

Allograft rejection is defined as tissue injury in a transplanted allogeneic organ produced by the effector mechanisms of the adaptive alloimmune response. Effector T lymphocytes and IgG alloantibodies cause two different types of rejection that can occur either individually or simultaneously: T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). In TCMR, cognate effector T cells infiltrate the graft and orchestrate an interstitial inflammatory response in the kidney interstitium in which effector T cells engage antigen-presenting myeloid cells, activating the T cells, antigen-presenting cells, and macrophages. The result is intense expression of IFNG and IFNG-induced molecules, expression of effector T cell molecules and macrophage molecules and checkpoints, and deterioration of parenchymal function. The diagnostic lesions of TCMR follow, i.e. interstitial inflammation, parenchymal deterioration, and intimal arteritis. In ABMR, HLA IgG alloantibodies produced by plasma cells bind to the donor antigens on graft microcirculation, leading to complement activation, margination, and activation of NK cells and neutrophils and monocytes, and endothelial injury, sometimes with intimal arteritis. TCMR becomes infrequent after 5-10 years post-transplant, probably reflecting adaptive mechanisms such as checkpoints, but ABMR can present even decades post-transplant. Some rejection is triggered by inadequate immunosuppression and non-adherence, challenging the clinician to target effective immunosuppression even decades post-transplant.

Chronic active T cell-mediated rejection is variably responsive to immunosuppressive therapy.

Chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (CA TCMR) is a newly described variant of kidney allograft rejection associated with long-term graft loss. Whether this form of rejection is related to under immunosuppression is debated and the benefit of immunosuppressive therapy in CA TCMR is unknown. Here we investigate the amenability of CA TCMR to treatment and examine the impact of clinical, histologic, and molecular parameters on outcomes. In a retrospective single institution review, we identified 48 cases of isolated CA TCMR, of which 44 were treated with pulse steroids or anti-thymocyte globulin, or both. Defining treatment response as an at least 50% estimated glomerular filtration rate recovery, a response was achieved in 20% of cases at four weeks post initiation of immunosuppressive therapy. Treatment responsiveness did not reflect the presence of concomitant acute T cell-mediated rejection, and was not significantly different between cases with mild, moderate, and severe parenchymal scarring. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward greater treatment responsiveness in cases with moderate as opposed to severe tubulitis. By targeted transcriptional profiling, increased allograft mast cells and alterations in lipid metabolism were identified as possible features of treatment resistant CA TCMR. Thus, our study shows that although its prognosis is generally poor, CA TCMR is not a homogenous entity and in a subset of cases, improvement in kidney function can be achieved with immunosuppressive therapy.