Meta-analysis application to hERG safety evaluation in clinical trials.

One objective of meta-analysis, which synthesizes evidence across multiple studies, is to assess the consistency and investigate the heterogeneity across studies. In this project, we performed a meta-analysis on moxifloxacin (positive control in QT assessment studies) data to characterize the exposure-response relationship and determine the safety margin associated with 10-msec QTc effects for moxifloxacin based on 26 thorough QT studies submitted to the FDA. Multiple meta-analysis methods were used (including two novel methods) to evaluate the exposure-response relationship and estimate the critical concentration and the corresponding confidence interval of moxifloxacin associated with a 10-msec QTc effect based on the concentration-QTc models. These meta-analysis methods (aggregate data vs. individual participant data; fixed effect vs. random effect) were compared in terms of their precision and robustness. With the selected meta-analysis method, we demonstrated the homogeneity and heterogeneity of the moxifloxacin concentration-QTc relationship in studies. We also estimated the critical concentration of moxifloxacin that can be used to calculate the hERG safety margin of this drug.

Thorough QT Study To Evaluate the Effect of Zoliflodacin, a Novel Therapeutic for Gonorrhea, on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Adults.

Zoliflodacin is a novel spiropyrimidinetrione antibiotic being developed as single oral dose treatment to address the growing global threat of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. To evaluate the cardiac safety of zoliflodacin, a thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study was performed in healthy subjects. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period crossover study, 72 subjects in a fasted state received a single dose of zoliflodacin at 2 g (therapeutic), zoliflodacin at 4 g (supratherapeutic), placebo, and moxifloxacin at 400 mg as a positive comparator. Cardiac repolarization was measured by duration of the corrected QT interval by Fridericia's formula (QTcF). At each time point up to 24 h after zoliflodacin administration, the upper limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the placebo-corrected change from the predose baseline in QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was less than 10 ms, indicating an absence of a clinically meaningful increase in QT prolongation. The lower limit of the one-sided multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI of ΔΔQTcF for moxifloxacin was longer than 5 ms at four time points from 1 to 4 h after dosing, demonstrating adequate sensitivity of the QTc measurement. There were no clinically significant effects on heart rate, PR and QRS intervals, electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology, or laboratory values. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity and transient. This was a negative TQT study according to regulatory guidelines (E14) and confirms that a single oral dose of zoliflodacin is safe and well tolerated. These findings suggest that zoliflodacin is not proarrhythmic and contribute to the favorable assessment of cardiac safety for a single oral dose of zoliflodacin. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT03613649.).

PK/PD modeling of a clazosentan thorough QT study with hysteresis in concentration-QT and RR-QT.

Clazosentan's potential QT liability was investigated in a thorough QT study in which clazosentan was administered intravenously as a continuous infusion of 20 mg/h immediately followed by 60 mg/h. Clazosentan prolonged the placebo-corrected change-from-baseline QT interval corrected for RR with Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF) with the maximum QT effect occurring 4 h after the maximum drug concentration, apparently associated with vomiting. The delayed effect precluded the standard linear modeling approach. This analysis aimed at characterizing the concentration-QT relationship in consideration of RR-QT hysteresis, concentration-ΔΔQTcF hysteresis, and the influence of vomiting. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was applied to characterize pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, i.e., ΔΔQTcF. Simulations were used to predict ΔΔQTcF for expected therapeutic dose used in Phase 3 clinical development. Correction for RR-QT hysteresis did not influence ΔΔQTcF to a relevant extent. Pharmacokinetics of clazosentan were best described by a linear two-compartment model. The delayed QT prolongation was characterized by an indirect-response model with loglinear drug effect. Vomiting had no statistically significant influence on QT prolongation despite apparent differences between subjects vomiting and not vomiting, probably since vomiting occurred mostly after the main QT prolongation. Following a simulated 3-h infusion of 15 mg/h of clazosentan, the upper bound of the predicted 90% CI for mean ΔΔQTcF was expected to exceed the 10-ms regulatory threshold of concern with maximum effect 3.5 h after end of infusion. TRN: NCT03657446, 05 Sep 2018.

Randomized study of the effect of gadopiclenol, a new gadolinium-based contrast agent, on the QTc interval in healthy subjects.

AIMS: We investigated the effect of gadopiclenol, a new gadolinium-based contrast agent, on the QTc interval at clinical and supraclinical dose, considering the relative hyperosmolarity of this product. METHODS: This was a single centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, 4-way crossover study. Forty-eight healthy male and female subjects were included to receive single intravenous (i.v.) administrations of gadopiclenol at the clinical dose of 0.1 mmol kg-1 , standard for current gadolinium-based contrast agents, the supraclinical dose of 0.3 mmol kg-1 , placebo and a single oral dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin. RESULTS: The largest time-matched placebo-corrected, mean change from-baseline in QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was observed 3 hours after administration of 0.1 mmol kg-1 gadopiclenol (2.39 ms, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35, 4.43 ms) and 5 minutes after administration of 0.3 mmol kg-1 (4.81 ms, 90%CI: 2.84, 6.78 ms). The upper limit of the 90% CI was under the threshold of 10 ms, demonstrating no significant effect of gadopiclenol on QTc interval. From 1.5 to 4 hours postdose moxifloxacin, the lower limit of the 90% CI of ΔΔQTcF exceeded 5 ms demonstrating assay sensitivity. Although there was a positive slope, the concentration-response analysis estimated that the values of ΔΔQTcF at the maximal concentration of gadopiclenol at 0.1 and 0.3 mmol kg-1 were 0.41 and 2.23 ms, respectively, with the upper limit of the 90% CI not exceeding 10 ms. No serious or severe adverse events or treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: This thorough QT/QTc study demonstrated that gadopiclenol did not prolong the QT interval at clinical and supraclinical doses and was well tolerated in healthy volunteers. The positive slope of the QTc prolongation vs concentration relationship suggests that hyperosmolarity could be associated with QTc prolongation. However, the amplitude of this effects is unlikely to be associated with proarrhythmia.

Absence of QTc prolongation in a thorough QT study with imeglimin, a first in class oral agent for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: Imeglimin is the first in a new class of oral antidiabetic agents, the glimins, currently in development to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A thorough QT study was conducted to establish electrophysiological effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of imeglimin on cardiac repolarization. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, four-period, placebo and active controlled crossover study, healthy subjects were administered a single dose of imeglimin 2250 mg, imeglimin 6000 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg, and placebo. 12-Lead Holter ECGs were recorded from 1 h before dosing until at least 24 h after each dose. This study was performed at a single-center inpatient clinical pharmacology unit. RESULTS: The upper bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval for time-matched, placebo-subtracted, baseline-adjusted QTc intervals (ΔΔQTcF) did not exceed the regulatory threshold of 10 ms in any of the imeglimin dose groups. There were no QTcF values above 500 ms nor changes from pre-dose in QTcF above 60 ms in the imeglimin groups. Imeglimin did not exert a relevant effect on heart rate and PR or QRS intervals. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated by the effect of moxifloxacin 400 mg, with a lower bound two-sided 90% confidence interval for ΔΔQTcF of 10.6 ms. CONCLUSION: This thorough QT study demonstrated that therapeutic and supratherapeutic exposures of imeglimin did not induce a QT/QTc prolongation with a strong confidence as evidenced by the assay sensitivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER/DATE: NCT02924337/ October 5, 2016.

A Randomized Study of the Single-Dose Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Food Effect of Chinfloxacin and Its Effect on Thorough QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

Chinfloxacin hydrochloride is a novel tricyclic fluorinated quinolone in development for treatment of conventional and biothreat infections. This first-in-human randomized study in Chinese healthy subjects was divided into 5 parts. Part A was a single-ascending-dose study to assess safety and tolerability of chinfloxacin. The single-dose pharmacokinetic study, a food effect study, and a multiple-dose pharmacokinetics study were conducted in parts B, C, and D, respectively. Part E was a randomized, placebo-controlled and positive-control single-dose, crossover study to evaluate the effect of chinfloxacin on thorough electrocardiographic QT/corrected QT (QTc) interval. The results suggest that single and multiple oral administrations of chinfloxacin were well tolerated. The observed adverse events (AEs) were dizziness, nausea, weakness, photosensitive dermatitis, and increased frequency of defecation. All AEs were mild and were resolved spontaneously without any treatment. The time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax and Cmax, respectively) was about 2 h, and the half-life was 14 to 16 h. Food slightly affected the drug's rate and extent of absorption, increasing the Tmax from 1.60 to 2.59 h and reducing the Cmax by 13.6% and area under the concentration-time curve by 8.95%. Chinfloxacin at 400 mg had no effect on prolongation of QT/QTc intervals. Although 600 mg chinfloxacin had a mild effect on the prolongation of the QT/QTc interval, the effect was less pronounced than that of the positive control, 400 mg moxifloxacin. The pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of chinfloxacin in healthy Chinese volunteers support its once-daily dosing in future clinical investigations. (This study has been registered at www.ChiCTR.org.cn under identifiers ChiCTR-TRC-10001619 for parts A to D and ChiCTR1800015906 for part E.).

Effects of moxifloxacin on the proarrhythmic surrogate markers in healthy Filipino subjects: Exposure-response modeling using ECG data of thorough QT/QTc study.

Effects of moxifloxacin on QTc as well as proarrhythmic surrogate markers including J-Tpeakc, Tpeak-Tend and short-term variability (STV) of repolarization were examined by using both standard E14 time-based evaluation and exposure-response modeling. The study was conducted with a single-blind, randomized, single-dose, placebo-controlled and two-period cross-over design in healthy Filipino subjects. QT interval was corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF). In the E14 time-based evaluation of ECG data, the largest ΔΔQTcF with 90% confidence interval was 14.1 ms (11.2-16.9) with Cmax of 3.39 µg/mL at 3 h post-dose (n = 69; male: 35, female: 34), indicating a positive effect on the QTcF. Moxifloxacin significantly increased the ΔΔJ-Tpeakc and ΔΔTpeak-Tend, whereas the ΔΔSTV was not altered. Meanwhile in the exposure-response modeling of the same ECG data, the slope of moxifloxacin plasma concentration-ΔΔQTcF relationship was 4.84 ms per µg/mL and the predicted ΔΔQTcF with 90% confidence interval was 13.8 ms (13.1-15.1) at Cmax, also indicating a positive effect on the QTcF. Importantly, results in each proarrhythmic surrogate marker obtained by the exposure-response modeling also showed high similarity to those obtained by the E14 statistical evaluation. Thus, these results of moxifloxacin may become a guide to estimate proarrhythmic potential of new chemical entities.

A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo- and Moxifloxacin-Controlled, Four-Period Crossover Study To Evaluate the Effect of Gepotidacin on Cardiac Conduction as Assessed by 12-Lead Electrocardiogram in Healthy Volunteers.

Gepotidacin is a novel, first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic in development for treatment of conventional and biothreat infections. This was a single-dose, crossover thorough QT study in healthy subjects who were administered intravenous (i.v.) gepotidacin as a therapeutic (1,000-mg) dose and supratherapeutic (1,800-mg) dose, placebo, and 400 mg oral moxifloxacin in 4 separate treatment periods. Gepotidacin caused a mild effect on heart rate, with a largest placebo-corrected change-from-baseline heart rate of 7 and 10 beats per minute at the end of the 1,000-mg and 1,800-mg infusion, respectively. Gepotidacin caused an increase of change-from-baseline QTcF (ΔQTcF), with a peak effect at the end of infusion. The largest mean placebo-corrected ΔQTcF (ΔΔQTcF) was 12.1 ms (90% confidence interval [CI], 9.5 to 14.8) and 22.2 ms (90% CI, 19.6 to 24.9) after 1,000 mg and 1,800 mg, respectively. ΔΔQTcF rapidly fell after the end of the infusion, with a mean ΔΔQTcF of 6.1 ms 60 min after the 1,800-mg dose. Exposure-response analysis demonstrated a statistically significant positive relationship between gepotidacin plasma levels and ΔΔQTcF, with a slope of 1.45 ms per µg/ml (90% CI, 1.30 to 1.61). Using this model, the effect on ΔΔQTcF can be predicted to be 11 and 20 ms at the observed mean peak plasma concentration after the infusion of gepotidacin at 1,000 mg (7 µg/ml) and 1,800 mg (13 µg/ml), respectively. In conclusion, gepotidacin caused QT prolongation in this thorough QT study, and a mean effect can be predicted to less than 15 ms at the highest expected plasma concentration, 9 µg/ml. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02257398.).

Thorough QT study of the effect of intravenous amisulpride on QTc interval in Caucasian and Japanese healthy subjects.

AIM: The D2 /D3 antagonist amisulpride has shown promising efficacy against postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) at low doses. We investigated whether intravenous amisulpride has an effect on the QTc interval in a formal Thorough QT study (TQT). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo and positive-controlled, four-way crossover study. Forty healthy Caucasian and Japanese subjects were included to receive a single administration of 5 mg and 40 mg of i.v. amisulpride or a single oral dose of moxifloxacin or placebo per period. RESULTS: The therapeutic dose of 5 mg amisulpride was associated with a slight, transient increase in mean ΔΔQTcF, from 2.0 ms prior to dosing to a peak of 5 ms (90% CI: 2.8, 7.1 ms) at 8 min, decreasing to 2.1 ms at 30 min after dosing. The supra-therapeutic dose of 40 mg given at twice the infusion rate was associated with prolongation in ΔΔQTcF peaking at 23.4 ms (90% CI: 21.3, 25.5 ms) at the end of infusion (8 min), returning below 10 ms within 1.5 h. Assay sensitivity was confirmed; ΔΔQTcF had increased by 12.3 ms (90% CI 10.1, 14.6 ms) at 4 h post-dose. The PK-PD relationship revealed no differences between Caucasian and Japanese subjects (p-value > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Amisulpride has a plasma concentration-dependent effect on the QTc interval. The proposed therapeutic dose for management of PONV does not lead to a prolongation of QTcF above the threshold of regulatory concern, while such effect could not be excluded for the supratherapeutic dose.

Can an early phase clinical pharmacology study replace a thorough QT study? Experience with a novel H3-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of pitolisant on QTcF interval in a single ascending dose (SAD) study and a thorough QT (TQT) study. METHODS: The SAD study at three dose levels of pitolisant enrolled 24 males and the TQT study at two dose levels 25 males. Both studies intensively monitored ECGs and pitolisant exposure. Effect on QTcF interval was analysed by Intersection Union Test (IUT) and by exposure-response (ER) analysis. Results from the two studies were compared. RESULTS: In both studies, moxifloxacin effect established assay sensitivity. IUT analysis revealed comparable pitolisant-induced maximum mean (90 % confidence interval (CI)) placebo-corrected increase from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) in both the studies, being 13.3 (8.1; 18.5) ms at 200-mg and 9.9 (4.7; 15.1) ms at 240-mg doses in SAD study and 5.27 (2.35; 8.20) ms at 120-mg dose in TQT study. ER analysis revealed that ER slopes in SAD and TQT studies were comparable and significantly positive (0.031 vs 0.027 ms/ng/mL, respectively). At geometric mean concentrations, bootstrap predicted ΔΔQTcF (90 % CI) were 9.23 (4.68; 14.4) ms at 279 ng/mL (240-mg dose) in the SAD study and 4.97 (3.42; 8.19) ms at 156 ng/mL (120-mg dose) in the TQT study. CONCLUSION: Pitolisant lacked an effect of regulatory concern on QTc interval in both the studies, however analysed, suggesting that the results from the SAD study could have mitigated the need for a TQT study. Our findings add to the growing evidence that intensive ECG monitoring in early phase clinical studies can replace a TQT study.

Establishing assay sensitivity in QT studies: experience with the use of moxifloxacin in an early phase clinical pharmacology study and comparison with its effect in a thorough QT study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of moxifloxacin as a positive control in a single ascending dose (SAD) study with that in a thorough QT (TQT) study. METHODS: Moxifloxacin was used as a positive control in a SAD study and a TQT study during the evaluation of the QT liability of a new drug. The SAD study had enrolled 24 males and the TQT study 25 males. Both studies intensively monitored electrocardiograms (ECGs) and pharmacokinetic sampling. Effect of moxifloxacin on QTc interval was analysed in each study by intersection union test (IUT) and by exposure-response (ER) analysis and the results compared. Cost-effectiveness of this approach was computed. RESULTS: Analysis by IUT revealed that the maximum mean (90 % confidence interval (CI)) placebo-corrected change from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) in the SAD study and the TQT study were remarkably similar (10.7 (6.5; 14.9) ms vs. 9.09 (6.20; 11.98) ms, respectively). In both studies, assay sensitivity was established by the 90 % lower bound exceeding 5 ms. ER analysis revealed the slopes in both studies to be significantly different from zero and comparable. Bootstrap-predicted effects of moxifloxacin at geometric mean concentrations of ~3000 ng/mL were 8.19 (90 % CI 5.86; 10.7) ms in the SAD study and 7.33 (90 % CI 5.69; 9.70) ms in the TQT study. CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin can be integrated effectively in a SAD study to establish assay sensitivity, and a TQT study may be replaced by a SAD study which has the required assay sensitivity. Further experience is warranted to verify this conclusion.

Detection of QTc effects in small studies--implications for replacing the thorough QT study.

BACKGROUND: ECG assessment with exposure response analysis applied to data from First-in-Man studies has been proposed to replace the thorough QT study for the detection of small QT effects. METHODS: Data from five thorough QT studies, three with moxifloxacin, one study with a drug with a large QTc effect (∼25 ms) and one with ketoconazole with a smaller QT effect (∼8 ms) were used. By subsampling, studies with 6-18 subjects on drug and six on placebo were simulated 1000 times per sample size to assess whether small QTc effects using ICH E14 criteria could be excluded and the impact of sample size on the estimate and variability of the slope of the concentration/QTc relation. RESULTS: With a sample size of nine or more on drug and six on placebo, the fraction of "false negative studies" was at or below 5% with data from the studies with moxifloxacin and from the drug with a large QTc effect. With the same sample size and no underlying QTc effect (placebo), the fraction of studies in which an effect above 10 ms could be excluded was above 85%. A treatment effect in the linear concentration-effect model resulted in a lower proportion of "false negatives." Sample size had little influence on the average slope estimate of the concentration/QTc relationship. CONCLUSIONS: For drugs with a QTc effect of around 12-14 ms, exposure response analysis applied to First-in-Man studies with careful ECG assessment can be used to replace the through QT study.

Macitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, does not affect cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects.

Macitentan is an orally active dual endothelin receptor antagonist, which demonstrated a reduction of the risk of morbidity/mortality events in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. This double-blind, randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, four-way crossover thorough QTc study was designed to investigate the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of macitentan on cardiac repolarization in healthy male and female subjects. Each subject received the following treatments: moxifloxacin 400 mg, macitentan 10 mg, macitentan 30 mg, and placebo. Each treatment period lasted 9 days and was followed by at least 10 days of washout. The primary endpoint of this study was the baseline-adjusted, placebo-corrected QT interval corrected using the Fridericia method (ΔΔQTcF). Pharmacokinetic (PK), safety, and tolerability assessments were performed during each treatment. A total of 64 subjects were randomized. The upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval for ΔΔQTcF following macitentan was <10 ms at all time points and no correlation was observed between ΔΔQTcF and PK parameters. Findings in the analysis of the morphological patterns of the ECGs were randomly distributed across all treatments and did not indicate an association with macitentan. Macitentan was well tolerated in this study. Headache and nasopharyngitis were the most frequently reported adverse events. No effects on clinical laboratory and vital signs parameters were observed. In summary, repeated doses of macitentan 10 mg and 30 mg did not indicate any pro-arrhythmic potential.

Thorough QT study of the effect of oral moxifloxacin on QTc interval in the fed and fasted state in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

AIMS: The aims of this study were three-fold and were to (i) investigate the effect of food (fasted and fed state) on the degree of QT prolongation caused by moxifloxacin under the rigorous conditions of a TQT study, (ii) differentiate the effects on QTc that arise from changes in PK from those arising as a result of electrophysiological changes attributable to raised levels of C-peptide [11] offsetting in part the IKr blocking properties of moxifloxacin and (iii) characterize the QTc F profile of oral moxifloxacin (400 mg) in healthy Japanese volunteers compared with Caucasian subjects. METHODS: The study population consisted of 32 healthy non-smoking, Caucasian (n = 13) and Japanese (n = 19), male and female subjects, aged between 20-45 years with a body mass index of between 18 to 25 kg m(-2). Female volunteers were required to use an effective contraceptive method or be abstinent. Subjects with ECGs which were deemed unsuitable for evaluation in a TQT study were excluded. ECGs were recorded in triplicate with subsequent blinded manual adjudication of the automated interval measurements. Electrocardiograms in the placebo arm were recorded twice in fasted and fed condition. RESULTS: The results demonstrated a substantial change in the typical moxifloxacin effect on the ECG. The effect on ΔΔQTc in the fed state led to a significant delay and a modest reduction compared with the fasted state correcting both conditions with the corresponding placebo data. The largest QTc F change from baseline in the fed state was observed at 4 h with a peak value of 11.6 ms (two-sided 90% CI 9.1, 14.1). In comparison, the largest QTc F change observed in the fasted state was 14.4 ms (90% CI 11.9, 16.8) and occurred at 2.5 h post-dose. The PK of moxifloxacin were altered by food and this change was consistent with the observed QTc F change. In the fed state plasma concentrations of moxifloxacin were considerably and consistently lower in comparison with the fasted state, and this applied to both ethnicities. The concentration-effect analysis revealed that there was no change in slope and confirmed that the difference in this analysis was caused by a change in the PK profile of moxifloxacin. Comparisons of the moxifloxacin effect in the fed state compared with fasted placebo also revealed a pharmacodynamic effect whereby a meal appears to antagonize the effects of moxifloxacin on the lengths of the QTc interval. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the food effect by itself leads to a shortening of the QTc interval offsetting in part the effects of a 400 mg single dose of oral moxifloxacin. The typical moxifloxacin PK profile is also altered by food prior to dosing reducing the Cmax and delays the peak effects on QTc up to several hours thereby reducing the overall magnitude of the effect and delaying the peak QTc prolongation. The contribution of the two effects was clearly discernible. Given that moxifloxacin is sometimes given with food in TQT studies, consideration should be given to adequate baseline corrections and appropriate sampling time points. In this study the PK-PD relationship was similar for Japanese and Caucasian subjects in the fed and fasted conditions, thereby providing further evidence that the sensitivity to the QTc prolonging effects of fluoroquinolones was likely to be independent of ethnicity. The small differences observed between the two subpopulations were not statistically significant. However, future studies should give consideration to formal ethnic comparisons as a secondary outcome parameter as very little is known about the relationship between ethnicity and drug effects on cardiac repolarization.

Comparison of two methods of estimating reader variability in QT interval measurements in thorough QT/QTc studies.

BACKGROUND: Two methods of estimating reader variability (RV) in QT measurements between 12 readers were compared. METHODS: Using data from 500 electrocardiograms (ECGs) analyzed twice by 12 readers, we bootstrapped 1000 datasets each for both methods. In grouped analysis design (GAD), the same 40 ECGs were read twice by all readers. In pairwise analysis design (PAD), 40 ECGs analyzed by each reader in a clinical trial were reanalyzed by the same reader (intra-RV) and also by another reader (inter-RV); thus, variability between each pair of readers was estimated using different ECGs. RESULTS: Inter-RV (mean [95% CI]) between pairs of readers by GAD and PAD was 3.9 ms (2.1-5.5 ms) and 4.1 ms (2.6-5.4 ms), respectively, using ANOVA, 0 ms (-0.0 to 0.4 ms), and 0 ms (-0.7 to 0.6 ms), respectively, by actual difference between readers and 7.7 ms (6.2-9.8 ms) and 7.7 ms (6.6-9.1 ms), respectively, by absolute difference between readers. Intra-RV too was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: RV estimates by the grouped- and pairwise analysis designs are comparable.

Timing of pre-dose baseline electrocardiograms in clinical trials: increased sampling over a prolonged baseline period worsens variance of QTc.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) currently recommends recording of electrocardiograms (ECGs) prior to drug administration in thorough QT studies over an hour or more time to improve reliability of baseline ECG values. However, the baseline period is usually in the morning during a period of intense trial activity and rapid circadian change in QTc. The purpose of this study was to determine if the practice of recording an extended baseline does, in fact, decrease QTc variance at baseline. METHODS: ECG data from three thorough QT studies (TQTS) in which three ECGs (commonly referred to as triplicates) were recorded at each of three pre-specified time points during the 60 to 90 minutes before drug administration were analyzed by determining the intra-subject and inter-subject standard deviation (SD) of QTcF (Fridericia-correct QT) for each of the three pre-drug time points and for the three time points combined. RESULTS: QTcF was relatively normally distributed in each study. Intra-subject variability of QTcF was greater for the combined triplicate recordings than for the individual triplicates at baseline treatment time points in 39 of 42 cases (93%). This was the case in 48% of the comparisons in the inter-subject analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of recording three sets of triplicate ECGs over an hour or more before drug administration in a TQTS increases variability of baseline QTcF consistently in cross-over designed trials, and in roughly half of parallel comparisons. Higher variability suggests that the three-triplicate approach does not provide a more reliable baseline value. Less variability of QTcF can be obtained by simply recording one triplicate prior to drug administration. This principal may apply to other ECG and other physiological variables that have a monotonic circadian trend or that may be affected by intense trial activity during the pre-drug hour.

Concentration-QTcF Modeling of Icenticaftor from a Randomized, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Thorough QT Study in Healthy Participants.

Icenticaftor (QBW251) is a potentiator of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor. Based on its mechanism of action, icenticaftor is expected to provide benefits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by restoring mucociliary clearance, which would eventually lead to a reduction of bacterial colonization and related inflammatory cascade. A placebo- and positive-controlled, 4-way crossover thorough QT study was conducted in 46 healthy participants with the objective to assess the effect of therapeutic (300 mg twice daily for 6 days) and supratherapeutic (750 mg twice daily for 6 days) oral doses of icenticaftor on electrocardiogram parameters, including concentration-corrected QT (QTc) analysis. Moxifloxacin (400 mg, oral) was used as a positive control. In the concentration-QTc analysis performed on pooled data from Day 1 and Day 6 (steady state), the estimated population slope was shallow and slightly negative: -0.0012 ms/ng/mL. The effect on the Fridericia corrected QT (QTcF) interval (∆ΔQTcF) was predicted to be -1.3 milliseconds at the icenticaftor 300-mg twice-daily peak concentration (geometric mean was 1094 ng/mL) and -5.5 milliseconds at the 750-mg twice-daily peak concentration (geometric mean Cmax was 4529 ng/mL) indicated a mild shortening effect of icenticaftor on QTcF interval length. The results of the by-time-point analysis indicated least squares placebo corrected mean ∆∆QTcF across time points ranged from -7.9 to 0.1 milliseconds at 1 and 24 hours after dosing both on Day 6 in the 750-mg dose group compared with -3.7 to 1.6 milliseconds at 1.5 and 24 hours after dosing on Day 1 in the 300-mg dose group. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated with moxifloxacin. The large accumulation of exposures, especially the 4.3-fold increase in peak plasma concentration observed at the icenticaftor 750-mg twice-daily dosage compared with Icenticaftor 300 mg twice daily (2.3-fold) on Day 6 provided a large concentration range (up to 9540 ng/mL) to evaluate the effect of icenticaftor on ΔΔQTcF. Based on the concentration-QTc analysis, an effect on ΔΔQTcF exceeding 10 milliseconds can be excluded within the full observed ranges of plasma concentrations on icenticaftor, up to approximately 9540 ng/mL. Icenticaftor at the studied doses demonstrated a mild shortening in QTcF, which is unlikely to be of clinical relevance in a therapeutic setting.

Early QT assessment--how can our confidence in the data be improved?

Exposure-response (ER) analysis has emerged as an important tool to interpret QT data from thorough QT (TQT) studies and allows the prediction of effects in the targeted patient population. Recently, ER analysis has also been applied to data from early clinical pharmacology studies, such as single and multiple ascending dose studies, in which high plasma concentrations are often achieved. In line with this, there is an on-going discussion between sponsors, academicians and regulators on whether 'early QT assessment' can provide sufficiently high confidence in assessment of QT prolongation to replace the TQT study. In this article, we discuss how QT assessment can be applied to early clinical studies ('early QT assessment') and what we believe is needed to achieve the same high confidence in the data as we currently obtain from data from the TQT study. The power to exclude a QTc effect exceeding 10 ms in small sample sizes using ER analysis will be discussed and compared with time-matched analysis, as described in the ICH E14 guidance. Two examples of early QT assessment are shared; one negative and one positive, and the challenge in terms of demonstrating assay sensitivity in the absence of a pharmacological positive control will be discussed. Finally, we describe a recent research proposal, which may generate data to support the replacement of the TQT study with data from QT assessment in early phase 1 studies.

Lomitapide at supratherapeutic plasma levels does not prolong the Qtc interval--results from a TQT study with moxifloxacin and ketoconazole.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of high plasma levels of lomitapide and its main metabolite on ECG parameters. METHODS: In this randomized five-way cross-over thorough QT study, 56 healthy subjects were enrolled. Study treatments were administered orally for 3 days in five separate periods in which subjects were dosed with (1) a single dose of 75 mg lomitapide on Day 1 followed by a single dose of 200 mg on Day 3; (2) ketoconazole 200 mg BID; (3) ketoconazole with a single dose of 75 mg lomitapide on Day 3; (4) a single dose of 400 mg moxifloxacin on Day 3 and (5) placebo. RESULTS: Single doses of 75 and 200 mg lomitapide alone or in combination with ketoconazole caused minor changes in the change-from-baseline QTcI (ΔQTcI), whereas moxifloxacin and ketoconazole caused an increase of ΔQTcI with a peak effect at 1 and 3 hours postdosing, respectively. The largest mean placebo-corrected ΔQTcI (ΔΔQTcI) for lomitapide did not exceed 3 ms (upper bound of 90% CI: 4.7 ms) at any time points postdosing. Ketoconazole caused mild QT prolongation with mean ΔΔQTcI of 5.9 and 6.5 ms at 2 and 3 hours postdosing, and exposure-response analysis demonstrated a significantly positive slope of 1.3 ms per µg/mL (90% CI: 1.0-1.7). Moxifloxacin met the criteria for assay sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Lomitapide does not have an effect on cardiac repolarization. The study's ability to detect small QTc changes was demonstrated with both moxifloxacin and ketoconazole.

Comparative TQT analysis with three fully-automated platforms: comparison to core laboratory semi-automated results.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Technological advances in machine-read QT measurement now enable detailed and precise cardiac repolarization assessments. This study assessed the applicability of three state-of-art ECG measurement applications to provide reliable continuous analyses from data obtained in a positive thorough QT study previously characterized with sparse semi-automated measurements performed by an ECG core laboratory. METHODS: Continuous RR, QT, QTc measurements, and individual QT/RR relationships and their associated intra- and inter-subject variability were derived in parallel with BioQT, Ponemah PRO, and WinAtrec analysis software. RESULTS: Despite slight vendor-specific differences in measurement variability and QTc, all machine-read methods demonstrated requisite assay sensitivity and yielded similar conclusions in accordance with SA analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Three commercially available ECG analytical software applications reliably detected the drug-induced QT prolonging effects and replicated the SA core-laboratory conclusions, with greatly improved temporal resolution and reduced analytical costs. With broader experience, these data suggest that current SA methodologies could be effectively replaced by fully automated ECG analysis.