Indonesian Study: Triiodothyronine for Infants Less than 5 Months Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of oral triiodothyronine on time to extubation for infants less than 5 months undergoing heart surgery in Indonesia, and primarily relates to patients in emerging programs with high malnutrition and mortality. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, oral triiodothyronine (T3, Tetronine®) 1 µg/kg-body weight/dose or placebo (saccharum lactis) was administered via nasogastric tube every 6 h for 60 h to treatment group. A total of 120 patients were randomized into T3 (61 patients) and placebo (59 patients) groups. The majority of the patients had moderate to severe malnutrition (55.83%) with a high post-operative mortality rate of 23.3%. The T3 group showed significantly higher serum FT3 levels from 1 until 48 h post cross-clamp removal (p < 0.0001), lower incidence of low cardiac output syndrome at both 6 h (28 [45.9%] vs. 39 [66.1%] patients, p = 0.03, OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.10-4.81) and 12 h after cross-clamp removal (25 [41.7%] vs. 36 [63.2%], p = 0.02, OR 2.40, 95% CI: 1.14-5.05). Although not statistically significant, the treatment group had shorter median (IQR) intubation time (2.59 [1.25-5.24] vs. 3.77 [1.28-6.64] days, p = 0.16, HR 1.36, 95% CI: 0.88-2.09)] and lower mortality (10 [16.4%] vs. 18 [30.5%], p = 0.07]. Patients with Aristotle score < 10.0 (low risk) receiving T3 had faster extubation than placebo patients (p = 0.021, HR of 1.90, 95% CI: 1.10-3.28) and were significantly less likely to require CPR or experience infection (p = 0.027, OR 8.56, 95% CI:0.99-73.9 and p = 0.022, OR 4.09 95% CI: 1.16-14.4, respectively). Oral T3 supplementation reduced overall incidence of low cardiac output syndrome and significantly reduced the time to extubation in low-risk patients. Therefore, prophylactic oral T3 administration may be beneficial in these patients.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02222532.

Does a combined intravenous-volatile anesthesia offer advantages compared to an intravenous or volatile anesthesia alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In anesthesia, additive drug interactions are used for reducing dose and dose-dependent side-effects. The combination of propofol with volatile anesthetics is rather unusual but might have advantages compared to the single use regarding PONV, time to extubation, movement during surgery and postoperative pain perception. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for relevant studies comparing combined intravenous volatile anesthesia with total intravenous or balanced anesthesia. The studies identified were summarized in a meta-analysis with the standardized mean difference or risk ratio as the effect size. RESULTS: Ten studies provided data. The risk for PONV in the recovery room was significantly reduced for a combined anesthesia compared to a balanced anesthesia (RR 0.657, CI 0.502-0.860, p-value 0.002). There was no significant difference detected either in the time to extubation or in pain perception. Movement during surgery was significantly reduced for a combined compared to a total intravenous anesthesia (RR 0.241, CI 0.135-0.428, p-value 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of propofol and volatiles may have some advantages in the early occurrence of PONV compared to a balanced anesthesia. To sufficiently evaluate potential advantages of a combination of volatiles and propofol further high-quality trials are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019126627 .

The Effect of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia on the Time-to-Extubation in Adult and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) ranks as a prominent hospital-acquired infection. VAP has been shown to have a detrimental impact on patients and healthcare facilities, leading to extended hospital stays, increased demands on medical resources, and higher financial expenses. This study aims to assess the influence of VAP on time-to-extubation and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours in pediatric and adult intensive care units (ICU). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult and pediatric ICU patients admitted to King Abdul-Aziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from June 2016 to May 2020. The study encompassed ICU patients who required mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. Time-to-extubation and LOS were measured in days and compared between those who developed VAP and those who did not. A Kaplan-Meier curve was employed to estimate and compare both groups' survival functions (time-to-event). RESULTS: The study involved 367 subjects, with 226 adults and 141 pediatric patients. Among the 367 mechanically ventilated patients, 33 (8.99%) developed VAP during their ICU stay, with 9 of them being children. VAP patients experienced a significantly longer time to extubation than non-VAP patients (13.5 vs. six days, p<0.0001). Likewise, ICU stays for VAP patients were significantly longer than those for non-VAP patients (19.5 vs. 13 days, p<0.002). However, the mortality rate at 28 days from intubation did not exhibit significant differences between the VAP and non-VAP groups (36.36% vs. 27.54%, p=0.283). CONCLUSION: This study underscores that VAP patients face a substantial delay in time-to-extubation and an increased length of ICU stay compared to non-VAP patients. Such findings substantially impact the cost of hospital care and the risk of exposure to other infection-related complications while under mechanical ventilation. Enhanced preventive measures are warranted to reduce the occurrence and consequences of VAP.

Effects of hypercapnia versus normocapnia during general anesthesia on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of mild changes in CO2 levels to organ perfusion and tissue inflammation are well known, whereas an influence of hypercapnia under general anesthesia on adverse events as nausea and vomiting, or length of hospital stay is barely examined. The goal of our meta-analysis was to identify possibly positive effects of hypercapnia versus normocapnia in general anesthesia in adult patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of parallel-arm randomised controlled trials comparing hypercapnia versus normocapnia in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. In July 2018 and September 2019 we searched "CENTRAL‿, "MEDLINE‿, and "Embase‿, checked reference lists of all included studies and relevant systematic reviews for additional references to trials. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data, and completed a "Risk of bias‿ assessment for all included studies. RESULTS: Our search identified 297 records after abstract screening 30 full-text papers remained for further examination. Ten publications met our inclusion criteria and were used for narrative description of this systematic review. Three studies were eligible for the meta-analysis normocapnia versus hypercapnia with the outcomes: time to extubation and adverse events. On average, time to extubation was significantly reduced in the hypercapnia group with a mean difference 3.78 (95% CI 0.85 to 6.71). No difference was found regarding adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study do not enable us to produce evidence of a positive influence of increased CO2 partial pressure levels during general anesthesia. A well-planned, adequately powered randomized controlled trial would be desirable in the future.

The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for postoperative sedation in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION: The α2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine is an effective postoperative sedative without clear advantages over midazolam or propofol. We hypothesized that routine use of dexmedetomidine allows early extubation in cardiac surgery patients. Secondary outcomes included the use of narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics during the first 48 hours, early postoperative functional status, and the incidence of bradycardia or hypotension. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit after cardiac surgery. Patient charts and the Society of Thoracic Surgery National database were reviewed. Patients who received no sedation were compared to those who received dexmedetomidine. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (52 receiving no sedation and 47 receiving dexmedetomidine) were included in this study. The median time to extubation was 3.9 (2.8-5.4) hours in the control group versus 4.7 (3.45-6.52) hours in the dexmedetomidine (P=.16). The incidence of bradycardia, hypotension, the ability to ambulate, and Glascow Coma Scores = 15 on postoperative day 0 did not differ significantly. Acetaminophen was used more frequently in the first 48 hours postoperatively in dexmedetomidine patients (P=.02) and a trend toward higher opioid (P=.09) and ketorolac use (P=.30) over the first 48 hours was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dexmedetomidine did not allow earlier extubation or less use of analgesics when compared to no sedation. Bradycardia and hypotension were not a problem with the use of dexmedetomidine.