Establishment of a risk index for early complications after trans-canal endoscopic ear surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with early postoperative complications of trans-canal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES), then to develop a risk index. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study reviewed TEESs from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019 in a tertiary hospital. In the derivation cohort, univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify factors significantly associated with early postoperative complications of TEES. Then these parameters were integrated into a trans-canal endoscopic ear surgery risk index (TEESRI). The performance of TEESRI was compared with that of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification using the validation cohort. RESULTS: 932 TEESs were enrolled in total and 151 (16.2%) developed early postoperative complications. In the derivation set, 8 factors including state of the opposite ear and presence of nasal or pharyngeal diseases were found to be independently associated with the occurrence of early postoperative complications on multivariable regression analysis [area under the curve (AUC), 0.806; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.765-0.848]. Using the validation cohort, the AUC of the TEESRI was 0.776 [95%CI, 0.711-0.842], with a sensitivity of 82.2% and specificity of 65.5%, while the AUC of the ASA classification was 0.512 (95%CI, 0.421-0.603). The TEESRI outperformed the ASA classification when evaluating the risk for early postoperative complications of TEES. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the 8 risk factors, the TEESRI was established with satisfactory predicting capacity. Surgeons should pay extra attention to the risk factors in the TEESRI, when treating patients.

Characterization of patient head motion in otologic surgery: Implications for TEES.

PURPOSE: Middle ear disease is increasingly being managed via transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES). A limitation of TEES is that it restricts the surgeon to single-handed dissection. One solution to this would be an endoscope holder to facilitate two-handed dissection. Current endoscope holders are stationary, and can cause potential damage from endoscope contact with the ossicles or ear canal if unintended head motion occurs from inadequate anesthetic. A dynamic device that could detect and react to patient motion would mitigate these concerns, but currently there is little formal characterization of the frequency, velocity and acceleration of unintended patient head motion during otologic procedures performed under general anesthesia. The present study aims to characterize intraoperative patient head motion kinematics during cases utilizing TEES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of adults undergoing otologic procedures performed with general anesthesia and without paralysis. Head motion was characterized using a nine-axis inertial measurement unit (IMU), (LPMS-B2, Life Performance Research) mounted to each patient's forehead for the procedure duration. RESULTS: Data was collected across 10 cases; 50% of patients were female and mean age was 50 ± 14 years. There was observed patient head motion in 40% of cases with maximum linear acceleration of 0.75 m/s2 and angular velocity of 12.50 degrees/s. CONCLUSIONS: Patient movement during otologic procedures was commonly observed, demonstrating the need for a dynamic holder to allow two-handed TEES. Results from this study are the first objective characterization of patient head motion kinematics during otologic procedures performed under general anesthesia.

Characterization of patient head motion in otologic surgery: Implications for TEES.

PURPOSE: Middle ear disease is increasingly being managed via transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES). A limitation of TEES is that it restricts the surgeon to single-handed dissection. One solution to this would be an endoscope holder to facilitate two-handed dissection. Current endoscope holders are stationary, and can cause potential damage from endoscope contact with the ossicles or ear canal if unintended head motion occurs from inadequate anesthetic. A dynamic device that could detect and react to patient motion would mitigate these concerns, but currently there is little formal characterization of the frequency, velocity and acceleration of unintended patient head motion during otologic procedures performed under general anesthesia. The present study aims to characterize intraoperative patient head motion kinematics during cases utilizing TEES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of adults undergoing otologic procedures performed with general anesthesia and without paralysis. Head motion was characterized using a nine-axis inertial measurement unit (IMU), (LPMS-B2, Life Performance Research) mounted to each patient's forehead for the procedure duration. RESULTS: Data was collected across 10 cases; 50% of patients were female and mean age was 50 ± 14 years. There was observed patient head motion in 40% of cases with maximum linear acceleration of 0.75 m/s2 and angular velocity of 12.50 degrees/s. CONCLUSIONS: Patient movement during otologic procedures was commonly observed, demonstrating the need for a dynamic holder to allow two-handed TEES. Results from this study are the first objective characterization of patient head motion kinematics during otologic procedures performed under general anesthesia.