Treatment-Sensitive and Treatment-Dependent Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Yield Superior Failure-Free and Overall Survival Compared to Treatment-Resistant Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Response to treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) may help predict prognosis and outcomes. We hypothesized that the response of cGVHD to treatment and the ability to taper immunosuppression define distinct treatment response categories that differ in terms of risk factors and prognosis. Our aim was to determine specific clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with 3 distinct cGVHD treatment response groups based on the response to and duration of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) as treatment-sensitive (TS), treatment-resistant (TR), and treatment-dependent (TD) cGVHD. This retrospective single-institution cohort study included 1142 consecutive adult and pediatric recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) performed for malignant and nonmalignant disorders at the University of Minnesota between 2008 and 2016. All donor, graft, conditioning regimen, and GVHD prophylaxis strategies were included, but only patients who commenced systemic treatment within 30 days of cGVHD diagnosis were included. A total of 185 patients who developed cGVHD necessitating IST within 30 days of cGVHD diagnosis were included in this analysis. At 1 year after cGVHD onset, 13% of the patients were TS, 27% were TD, and 60% were TR (including 14% deceased), whereas at 2 years after cGVHD onset, 29% were TS, 5% were TD, and 66% were TR (including 22% deceased). In a landmark analysis starting at 1 year after cGVHD onset, 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were lowest in the TR group (FFS, 38%; OS, 70%), with comparable outcomes in the TD (74% and 82%, respectively) and TS (79% for both) groups. Compared to no cGVHD, TR cGVHD was associated with worse OS at 5 years after cGVHD (hazard ratio, 2.09 versus no cGVHD; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.3; P < .01). Our findings suggest that refining cGVHD classification into 3 treatment response states defines important predictors of early and late clinical outcomes and identifies patients needing more effective treatment.

Treatment-Responsive Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease after Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Prophylaxis: Incidence and Clinical Outcomes.

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has emerged as standard of care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention in adult patients without increasing malignant relapse. We previously defined acute GVHD (aGVHD) treatment response categories as corticosteroid-sensitive (SS), -dependent (SD), or -resistant (SR) based on response to first-line corticosteroids and reported their clinical outcomes following non-PTCy-based prophylaxis. More than one-third of patients developed aGVHD necessitating systemic therapy. Cases were predominantly SR, with a 14% overall incidence of SR aGVHD. The incidence and clinical outcomes of these 3 distinct aGVHD treatment response groups following PTCy-based prophylaxis have not been well described. The objective of this retrospective single-institution cohort study was to assess the incidence and clinical outcomes of SS, SD, and SR aGVHD following HCT with PTCy-based prophylaxis using a prophylactic regimen of PTCy, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). We included 196 consecutive adult and pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HCT for malignant and non-malignant disorders at the University of Minnesota between 2017 and 2021. Patients received PTCy on days +3 and +4 plus tacrolimus and MMF prophylaxis. Bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell graft sources and related and unrelated donors were included. Recipients received myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. Of the 196 allografts, 54 (28%) developed aGVHD before day +180, with a median time to onset of 50 days (interquartile range, 34 to 71 days). Of those, 32 patients (16% overall) developed maximum grade II-III aGVHD necessitating systemic corticosteroids, with the following response: 13 SS (41%), 10 SD (31%), and 9 SR (28%). The overall incidence of SR aGVHD was 4.6%. Only 12 patients (6%) developed maximum grade III aGVHD, and none had grade IV aGVHD. The 2-year overall survival analyzed from 80 days after initiation of systemic treatment was similar in the SS and SD groups (77 and 75%, respectively), comparable to those without aGVHD (81%), and was lowest in the SR group (20%), with GVHD the primary cause of death. Nonrelapse mortality was highest in the SR group. MN high-risk and higher GVHD grade at onset were risk factors for developing SR aGVHD. Overall, we report a low incidence (16%) of aGVHD requiring systemic corticosteroids with PTCy-based prophylaxis. aGVHD cases were predominantly SS aGVHD, with lower incidences of SD and SR aGVHD. Our findings suggest that PTCy-based prophylaxis reduces the rate of treatment-resistant aGVHD. Patients with SR aGVHD had the worst clinical outcomes and poorest survival. Those with SS and SD aGVHD had similar clinical outcomes, both better than seen with SR aGVHD.

Application of Treatment-dependent Prognosis Index (TPI) for determination of the prognosis in the cases of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Applied TNM-system for determination and prognostic classification of the cancer patients of Oral and Maxillofacial region does, however, only partly justice, if at all, to the nature of the tumor disease. And the TNM-system implies among other defects a crude simplification of the complex pattern of the tumor disease. But in clinical practice, the prognosis must be determined on the bases of a specific combination of clinical factors under consideration of various therapeutical conditions. For more reliable and objective prognosis determination for the cancer patients of Oral and Maxillofacial region, `Retrospective DOSAK(German-Austrian-Swiss Association for Head and Neck Tumors) study' introduced Treatment-dependent Prognosis Index TPI in 1982. Treatment-dependent Prognosis Index TPI gives the clinician an opportunity to determine the prognosis before starting therapy at the time of the first admission of the patient, during the therapy and immediately after complete of the therapy. The fundamental purpose of the TPI can be summarized as follows. 1) In clinical-therapeutical cancer research the TPI provides a sound basis for the planning and verification of therapy studies. 2) In clinical practice the TPI allows a reliable and objective determination of the prognosis for the individual patient and thus provides the clinician valuable assistance in planning the treatment. The authors estimated the survival curves of the 179 cases of squamous cell carcinoma from 1985.1.1 to 1992.8.31 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital according to Treatment-dependent Prognosis Index TPI of Retrospective DOSAK study and compared with the survival curves observed in long term study on prognosis of patients.