Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Transl Med ; 16(1): 197, 2018 07 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016963

RESUMO

BACKGROUNDS: UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A subfamily (UGT1A) enzymes can inactivate cytarabine (Ara-C) by glucuronidation, and thus serves as candidate genes for interindividual difference in Ara-C response. UGT1A1 is a major UGT1A isoform expressed in human liver. METHODS: UGT1A1*6 and *28 polymorphisms resulting in reduced UGT1A1 activity were genotyped in 726 adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated with Ara-C based regimens. Influences of both polymorphisms on chemosensitivity and disease prognosis of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: After one or two courses of Ara-C based induction chemotherapy, the complete remission (CR) rate was significantly higher in patients carrying the UGT1A1*6 (77.0%) or the UGT1A1*28 (76.4%) alleles as compared with corresponding wild-type homozygotes (66.9 and 68.5%, respectively). Carriers of the UGT1A1*6 or *28 alleles showed significantly decreased risk of non-CR (OR = 0.528, 95% CI 0.379-0.737, P = 1.7 × 10-4) and better overall survival (HR = 0.787, 95% CI 0.627-0.990, P = 0.040) as compared with homozygotes for both polymorphisms. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 are associated with improved clinical outcomes in Chinese AML patients treated with Ara-C.


Assuntos
Citarabina/uso terapêutico , Glucuronosiltransferase/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Adulto , Citarabina/farmacologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Estudos de Associação Genética , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/enzimologia , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Cancer ; 123(18): 3494-3501, 2017 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493308

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin in combination with either 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine is commonly used as first-line therapy for patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma. The addition of irinotecan improves survival in other gastrointestinal tumors but at the cost of hematologic toxicity. The authors performed a phase 2 cooperative group study (North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543, Alliance) using genotype-dosed capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (gCAPIRINOX), with dosing assigned based on UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) genotype to test: 1) whether the addition of irinotecan would improve outcomes; and 2) whether UGT1A1 genotype-based dosing could optimize tolerability. METHODS: Previously untreated patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma received irinotecan (day 1), oxaliplatin (day 1), and capecitabine (days 2-15) in a 21-day cycle and were dosed with gCAPIRINOX according to UGT1A1*28 genotypes (6/6, 6/7, and 7/7). RESULTS: A total of 33 patients (17 with the 6/6 genotype, 10 with the 6/7 genotype, and 6 with the 7/7 genotype) were enrolled from October 2007 to November 2013; 73% were male, with a mean age of 64 years (range, 41-77 years). Location of the primary tumor included the duodenum (58%), jejunum (30%), and ileum (9%). The regimen yielded a confirmed response rate of 37.5% (95% confidence interval, 21%-56%), with a median progression-free survival of 8.9 months and a median overall survival of 13.4 months. Neither hematologic toxicity (grade ≥3 in 52.9%, 30.0%, and 33.3%, respectively, of the 6/6, 6/7, and 7/7 genotype groups) nor tumor response rate (41.2%, 33%, and 33%, respectively) were found to differ significantly by UGT1A1 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: UGT1A1 genotype-directed dosing (gCAPIRINOX) appears to be feasible with favorable rates of hematologic toxicity compared with prior 3-drug studies in unselected patients. Larger studies would be needed to determine the regimen's comparability to oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOx) alone or if response/toxicity differs among patients with different UGT1A1 genotypes. Cancer 2017;123:3494-501. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Camptotecina/efeitos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , Institutos de Câncer , Capecitabina/efeitos adversos , Capecitabina/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Genótipo , Glucuronosiltransferase/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Intestinais/patologia , Intestino Delgado/efeitos dos fármacos , Irinotecano , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Compostos Organoplatínicos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Organoplatínicos/uso terapêutico , Oxaliplatina , Farmacogenética , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa