Robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of literature reporting on long-term outcomes following robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study assessed the long-term survivorship, patient-reported satisfaction and pain scores following robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A single surgeon's database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA with a cemented, fixed-bearing prosthesis prior to May 2015. Patients were contacted to determine implant survivorship, satisfaction and pain. Kaplan-Meier models were applied to analyse survival. RESULTS: A total of 77 knees (70 patients) with a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 1.5 years (range: 8.1-13.3) were included. Five knees were revised, corresponding to a 10-year survivorship of 96.1% and estimated survival time of 12.7 ± 0.3 years (95% confidence interval: 12.2-13.2) with all-cause revision as the endpoint. Unexplained pain (40.0%) and progression of OA (40.0%) in contralateral compartments were the most reported reasons for revision. Among patients without revision, 94.4% were either satisfied or very satisfied with their lateral UKA and the average pain score was 1.1. CONCLUSION: Robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA led to high implant survivorship and patient satisfaction, and low pain scores at long-term follow-up. Progression of OA in contralateral compartments and unexplained pain were the most frequent reasons for revision. These findings support the continued use of robotic-arm-assisted lateral UKA for lateral compartment OA; however, its clinical value over conventional techniques remains to be established in prospective comparative studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.

Valgus stress knee radiographs accurately anticipate the bone resection in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Protocol validation using an image-based robotic system.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe a planning method for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) implantation using preoperative stress radiographs to measure the thickness of tibial and femoral bone resections and to validate this method with data from an image-based robotic surgery system. Having such method for preoperative planning would be of interest for surgeons performing UKA in order to anticipate optimal bone resection on both tibia and femoral sides. METHODS: A new planning method for medial UKA based on valgus stress knee radiographs validated it with an image-based robotic surgery system (Restoris MCK, MAKO®, Stryker Corporation) was proposed. This retrospective study involved radiographic measurements of 76 patients who underwent image-based robotic medial UKA between April 2022 and February 2023. Preoperative anteroposterior stress radiographs of the knee were used to simulate UKA implantation. The UKA technique was based on Cartier's angle and aimed at restoring the joint line. The total dimension measured was 14 mm (8 mm for minimal tibial component and polyethylene insert + 4 mm for femoral component + 2 mm for safety laxity). Bone resections were measured in the preoperative valgus stress radiographs and then against the intraoperative bone resection data provided by the robotic system. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed using 25 measurements. RESULTS: The mean planned tibial resection measured in the radiographs was 4.3 ± 0.4 [2.9-5.8], while the mean robotic resection was 4.2 ± 0.5 [2.7-5.8] (mean difference = 0.15 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.27 to 0.57]). There was a strong correlation between these two values (Pearson's rank R = 0.79, p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were also very strong (Pearson's rank R = 0.91, p < 0.001, and Pearson's rank R = 0.82, p < 0.001, respectively). The mean planned femoral bone resection measured in the radiographs was 2.7 ± 0.7 mm [1-4.5], while the mean robotic resection was 2.5 ± 0.9 [1-5] (mean difference = 0.21 mm, 95% CI [-0.66 to 1.08]). There was a strong correlation between these two values (Pearson's rank R = 0.82, p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were also strong (Pearson's rank R = 0.88, p < 0.001, and Pearson's rank R = 0.84, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study describes and validates with robotic information a simple and reproducible preoperative planning method to determine femoral and tibial bone resection for medial UKA implantation using antero-posterior valgus stress knee radiographs, leaving a medial safety laxity of 2 mm. It represents a very valuable contribution to the understanding of UKA principles, which can serve to extend its indications and increase reproducibility of the surgical technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective cohort study.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves mental health in patients with single compartment knee osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative mental health status improves following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with single compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A total of 163 patients underwent UKA [115 (71%) medial, 48 (29%) lateral] (mean age = 65 ± 11) completed preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative veterans RAND 12 item health survey (VR-12) mental component score (MCS). VR-12 MCS was the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures included VR-12 physical component summary score (PCS), knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and KOOS patient acceptable symptom state at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The median VR-12 MCS improved from 50.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 43.7-56.8] to 55.0 [IQR: 52.3-57.0] (p < 0.001) at a mean follow-up of 9.5 ± 4 years (range 2-19 years) following UKA. Preoperative VR-12 MCS was significantly correlated with patients postoperative VR-12 PCS (ρ = 0.294, p < 0.01), KOOS pain (ρ = 0.201, p = 0.012), KOOS ADL (ρ = 0.243, p = 0.002) and KOOS quality of life (ρ = 0.233, p < 0.01). Sixty-three (39%) patients improved from low VR-12 MCS (<50) to normal VR-12 MCS (≥50). One hundred forty-two (87%) achieved a normal VR-12 MCS score (≥50) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: At a mean of 10-year follow-up, patients who underwent UKA for single compartment osteoarthritic knee pain demonstrated significant improvement in mental health scores. UKA resulted in normal mental health in a majority of patients (87%). The resultant improved mental health scores were associated with improved patient pain and activities of daily living. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective cohort study.

Using at least 20% medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with improved patient-reported outcome measures across all knee arthroplasty patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of orthopaedic surgeons' arthroplasty distributions on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following knee arthroplasty, thus addressing the gap in knowledge regarding the optimal distribution of arthroplasties. METHODS: 2256 knee arthroplasties were included (total knee arthroplasty [TKA] or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [UKA]). All were conducted at a single centre between August 2016 and August 2022 with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and the Activity and Participation Questionnaire (APQ) were assessed preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Patients were categorized based on the surgeons' yearly surgeries: (1) TKA only, (2) TKA+ <20% medial UKA, (3) TKA+ ≥20% medial UKA and (4) TKA+ ≥20% medial UKA + lateral UKA + patellofemoral UKA. Linear regression models adjusted for demographic variables and preoperative PROM scores were used to estimate changes in mean PROM scores. RESULTS: Group 4 showed significantly higher improvements in PROM scores at 3 and 12 months compared to Group 1. In the 12-month adjusted analysis, Group 4 had 1.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-2.8) higher OKS-, 7.0 points (95% CI: 3.9-10.2) higher FJS- and 8.3 points (95% CI: 4.8-11.8) higher APQ-change than Group 1. There were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2, nor any clinically relevant differences between Groups 3 and 4. Additionally, the percentage of patients who achieved excellent OKS (>41) was significantly higher in Groups 3 + 4 compared to Groups 1 + 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite limitations, the findings of this study suggest that utilizing ≥20% medial UKA leads to greater postoperative improvements in PROM across all treated knee arthroplasty patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Enhancing robotic precision in medial UKA: Image-based robot-assisted system had higher accuracy in implant positioning than imageless robot-assisted system across 292 knees.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the degree of accuracy in implant positioning and limb alignment offered by two robot-assisted (RA) systems: an image-based robot-assisted (IBRA) versus an imageless robot-assisted (ILRA) system for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: This retrospective radiographic study included medial UKAs performed between 2011 and 2023. Radiographic measurements taken preoperatively and at 1-year postoperative control visit focusing on hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), tibial component coronal alignment relative to Cartier's angle and restoration of proper joint line (JL) height were analyzed. Outliers for postoperative measurements were defined as follows: HKA <175° or >180°, PTS <2° or >8°, >3° or <-3° alterations in Cartier's angle and ±2 mm changes in the height of the joint line. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 292 medial UKAs: 95 (32.5%) with an IBRA system and 197 (67.5%) with an ILRA system. Implant positioning and limb alignment were more accurate in the group of patients treated with IBRA, HKA (77.9% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.07), PTS (93.7% vs. 82.7%, p = 0.01), restoration of tibial varus relative to Cartier's angle (87.4% vs. 65%, p < 0.001) and restoration of JL height (81.1% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Medial UKA surgery using an IBRA system was associated with a higher degree of accuracy in implant positioning and postoperative limb alignment as compared to an ILRA system. This is a valuable contribution to help communicate the advantages of using this surgical technique and improve its reproducibility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

The efficacy of unicondylar knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthritis of the knee combined with anterior cruciate ligament dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the outcome and prognosis after Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with medial compartment arthritis of the knee combined with anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 122 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and treated with medial mobile platform unicondylar replacement at our center from January 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively included in the study, and were divided into two groups according to ACL function, namely the normal ACL function group (ACLF) and the poor ACL function (N-ACLF) group. The postoperative results and prognosis of the two groups were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: This study included 122 patients who underwent UKA surgery. There were no statistical differences in preoperative and postoperative posterior tibial tilt angle, knee mobility, KOOS, and prognosis between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For medial compartment arthritis of the knee combined with ACL malfunction, surgery resulted in pain relief, improved quality of life and a good prognosis for such patients. It is hoped that clinicians will perform UKA in patients with ACL dysfunction after a comprehensive evaluation to improve their quality of life.

Femoral Coronal Malalignment is Associated With Failure in Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Femur-first (FF) technique for mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been described as an alternative to tibia-first (TF) technique. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic results in UKAs using FF or TF techniques and their influence on failure rates. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 288 UKAs with a minimum 2-year follow-up. There were 147 knees in the TF and 141 knees in the FF cohorts. Alignment parameters and overhang were assessed as outliers and far outliers. The mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 16), the mean age was 63 years (range, 27 to 92), and 45% of patients were women. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were carried out with Cox regression models. RESULTS: There were 13 and 6 revisions in the TF and FF cohorts, respectively. The FF had lower rates of femoral coronal alignment (FCA) or femoral sagittal alignment outliers compared to the TF (5.7% versus 19%, P = .011). Tibial coronal alignment and tibial sagittal alignment did not significantly differ between the techniques (22.7% in FF versus 29.9% in TF, P = .119). Overhang outliers did not differ significantly between the groups. Younger age was associated with a higher revision rate (P = .006), while FF versus TF, sex, body mass index, and postoperative mechanical axis did not show statistically significant associations. In multivariate analysis, FCA outliers and younger age were significantly associated with revision. CONCLUSIONS: The FF technique in mobile-bearing UKA resulted in fewer FCA outliers compared to TF. Despite improved knee alignment with the FF technique, FCA outliers and younger age were associated with a higher revision rate, independent of technique.

Fixed-Bearing Lateral Unicompartment Knee Arthroplasty in Degenerative ACL-Deficient and ACL-Intact Knees: A Matched Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees are no longer considered a contra-indication for unicompartment knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who had an ACL-deficient knee who underwent lateral UKA had similar mean 10-year outcomes compared to patients who had an ACL-intact knee and lateral UKA. METHODS: Patients who underwent a lateral UKA with ACL deficiency by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2016 were identified. Preoperative magnetic resonance images were utilized to identify a torn or absent ACL in all knees. The absence of an ACL was confirmed during arthroscopy prior to UKA. Patients were matched 1:2 based on age and sex with patients who underwent lateral UKA with an ACL intact knee. The primary patient-reported outcome variable was survival without conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Secondary outcomes included Veterans Rand-12, the Lysholm score, the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score activities of daily living subscale, and Sport subscale. A power analysis showed that 14 patients were needed to identify differences of 10 points on the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score with a power of 80% (P = .05). RESULTS: The cohort of patients who had an ACL-deficient lateral UKA included 4 men and 12 women (43 to 82 years of age). The matched control group included 32 patients. The mean age of both groups was 67 years (range, 43 to 85). There were 2 patients in the ACL-deficient group who failed. At 10 years, survivorship in the ACL-deficient group was 85%, while survival in the ACL-intact group was 100% (P = .035). At an average follow-up of 11 years (range, 4 to 19.6), there was no difference in outcome scores between ACL-deficient and ACL-intact patients. CONCLUSION: Fixed-bearing lateral UKA in the ACL-deficient knee resulted in lower survival than patients who had an intact ACL. Patient-reported outcomes were similar in both groups. The ACL-deficient patient who wishes to undergo lateral UKA should be counseled on the lower survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. Retrospective cohort study.

Starting up a Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Practice - Is Outcome Affected?

BACKGROUND: In the past, the utilization of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been limited at national levels, despite the fact that an estimated 10% of patients who have an indication for arthroplasty, present with isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA). Units dedicated to UKA have reported good outcomes. Identifying patients for the procedure has been less clear, and the procedure has been perceived to be technically more demanding than medial UKA. This may result in a reluctance to start a lateral UKA practice and challenge the early phase. Therefore, this paper aimed to present the outcomes and learning curve when starting up a lateral UKA practice, as this theme remains unelucidated. METHODS: There were 85 primary fixed-bearing lateral UKAs, with a minimum of 1-year follow-up, performed between 2016 and 2022 by 2 arthroplasty surgeons with existing UKA practices. The indications were primary (n = 79) or post-traumatic (n = 6) OA. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at 3, 12, and 24 months. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to evaluate surgical duration and the 12-month Oxford Knee Score (OKS). RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) 12-month OKS, activity and participation questionnaire, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were 43 (37.5 to 46), 78 (42.5 to 98.5), and 72 (55 to 90), respectively. The OKS outcomes did not reveal adverse effects from the learning curve. A performance shift in surgical duration was observed around case 33. Kaplan-Meier implant survival reached 95.4% at 7 years for the endpoint "implant revision" and 93.5% for "implant revision or implant addition." CONCLUSIONS: Starting up a lateral UKA practice is safe and efficient for surgeons who have prior medial UKA experience, provided strict adherence to indications. While surgical duration indicated a learning curve over approximately 33 cases, PROMs remained stable, suggesting proficient outcomes irrespective of the learning curve.

Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis sought to compare the efficacy of cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA) for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the following databases was conducted: Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, the Web of Science, and MEDLINE. The objective was to identify literature comparing cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis. Duplicate literature, low-quality literature, literature with incompatible observations, and literature for which the full text was not available were excluded. Two independent researchers employed the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included literature. The data then were extracted and subsequently meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.4. RESULTS: A total of 12 papers were included in the analysis, encompassing a cumulative of 2558 cumulative cases. Of these, 1258 were cemented and 1300 were cementless. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes of cemented versus cementless Oxford UKA. The Oxford UKA group exhibited a significantly longer surgery time than the cementless Oxford UKA group [mean difference (MD) = 9.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) (7.64,12.17)]. Additionally, the cemented Oxford UKA group demonstrated a significantly lower knee OKS score compared to the cementless Oxford UKA group. The mean difference (MD) was - 1.58 (95% CI: -2.30, -0.86), indicating a significantly lower score for the cemented Oxford UKA group. Similarly, the mean difference (MD) was - 1.8 for the knee KSS clinical score, indicating a significantly lower score for the cemented Oxford UKA group. The results demonstrated that the knee KSS functional score was significantly lower in the cemented Oxford UKA group than in the cementless Oxford UKA group [MD=-1.72, 95% CI (-3.26, -0.37)]. 95% CI (-3.27,-0.17)], the cemented Oxford UKA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of radiolucent lines around the prosthesis than the cementless Oxford UKA group [ratio of ratios (OR) = 3.62, 95% CI (1.08,12.13)]. The revision rate was significantly higher in the cemented Oxford UKA group than in the cementless Oxford UKA group [OR = 2.22, 95% CI (1.40,3.53)]. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of reoperation rate, five-year prosthesis survival rate, and complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated that, in comparison to cemented Oxford UKA, cementless Oxford UKA resulted in a reduction in surgical time, an improvement in knee OKS score, KSS clinical score, and KSS functional score, and a decrease in the incidence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines and the rate of revisions.

Anteromedial knee osteoarthritis (AMOA) evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a cohort study of 100 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are increasingly used for knee osteoarthritis evaluation and preoperative planning before unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and often patients already have MRI scans before their initial surgeon consultation. This highlights the need for surgeons to understand anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) patterns on MRI. Hence, we aim to describe MRI findings in patients with AMOA meeting current indications for medial UKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed MRI scans from 100 knees evaluated for UKA between 2006 and 2013. Inclusion criteria comprised full-thickness medial compartment loss and intact lateral compartment joint space on preoperative radiographs. Assessment included cartilage lesions, osteophytes, meniscal damage, and anterior-cruciate ligament (ACL) status on tibial and femoral surfaces. Final decision to proceed with UKA relied on intraoperative findings, independent of MRI. RESULTS: Complete anteromedial tibial and femoral cartilage loss preserved posterior cartilage rims was evident in all cases. Cartilage thinning occurred in the lateral compartment in 34% of cases. While 62% displayed lateral osteophytes, only 6 exhibited small areas of full-thickness cartilage loss. ACL abnormalities varied: 27% normal, 3% ruptured, and 70% had intrasubstance high signal. Larger osteophytes in the medial (p = 0.012) and lateral (p = 0.002) intercondylar notch correlated significantly with ACL damage. All underwent medial UKA, with no evidence of areas with full lateral compartment cartilage loss intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The MRI findings confirmed the radiographic diagnosis of bone-on-bone medial disease but highlights a range of findings in the ACL, lateral compartment, and patellofemoral joint compartment for patients who met the current x-ray and intraoperative indication for UKA. Further research is required to understand if these MRI changes will affect long-term outcomes.

Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial periprosthetic fractures (TPF) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are a rare condition that affects about 1% of cases. Known risk factors include age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and bone density, as well as surgical technique and prosthesis design. The purpose of the study was to determine if undersizing of the tibial component in relation to the femoral component increases the risk of tibial periprosthetic fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over a 6-year-period 1542 patients with cemented (n = 363) and uncemented (n = 1179) medial UKA were retrospectively evaluated. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were identified and classified, and epidemiologic data were documented at follow-up. Undersizing was defined as a smaller tibial component compared to the femoral implant. The association of potential risk factors for TPF with the incidence of TPF was investigated with binominal logistic regression. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (0.9%) suffered from TPF at a median of 1 month after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 5.9 ± 1.7 years. Fractures were more common in cases with undersized tibial components [odds ratio (OR) 3.2, p < 0.05]. Furthermore, older age (OR 1.1, p < 0.05) and female sex (OR 6.5, p < 0.05) were identified as significant risk factors, while BMI (p = 0.8) and cemented implantation (p = 0.2) had no effect on fracture rate. Revision surgery included open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Undersizing of implant sizes in UKA increases the risk for TPF especially in patients with small tibial implants. Therefore, mismatched implants should be avoided for UKA particularly when risk factors like obesity, older age, or female gender are present. Tibial periprosthetic fractures were successfully treated by open reduction and internal fixation or conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

Change in patellar height in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on patellar height changes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is lacking. Therefore, this study compared the patella height in patients who underwent medial versus lateral UKA. Moreover, a subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate whether sex, age, and BMI of the patients exert an influence on the postoperative patellar height. METHODS: Radiographs and hospital records of patients undergoing UKA were prospectively collected. Surgeries were performed by one author with long experience in UKA in a highly standardised fashion. The implants were fixed-bearing medial PPK (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) and fixed-bearing lateral ZUK (Lima Corporate, Udine, Italy). The patellar height was measured using the Insall-Salvati and Caton-Deschamps indices. RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were included: 119 patients were included in the medial and 84 in the lateral UKA. The mean age of the patients was 68.9 ± 6.7 years, and the mean BMI was 28.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2. 54% (110 of 203 patients) were women. On admission, between-group comparability was found in age, BMI, sex, and length of the follow-up. No between-group and within-group difference was detected pre- and post-operatively in the Insall-Salvati and Caton-Deschamps indices in patients who have undergone medial versus lateral UKA. Concerning the subgroup analyses, no between-group and within-group difference was detected pre- and post-operatively in all comparisons according to sex, age, and BMI. CONCLUSION: No difference was found in patella height in patients who have undergone medial compared to lateral UKA. Furthermore, there was no evidence of an association between patient characteristics (sex, age, BMI) and patella height between medial and lateral UKA.

Favorable early outcomes of medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty in active patients presenting a degenerative medial meniscus root tear with meniscal extrusion and mild radiographic osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: There is only limited literature available evaluating the preferable treatment for active mid-age or elderly patients presenting with a degenerative medial meniscus root tear (d-MMRT) with medial meniscal extrusion (MME) and early-phase radiographic osteoarthritis (OA), failing to provide solid evidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate early outcomes of medial unicompartimental arthroplasty (mUKA) in active patients presenting a d-MMRT with meniscal extrusion and mild radiographic OA of the knee. To prove this claim we hypothesized that (1) patients with a d-MMRT with initial grade 1-3 KL OA of the medial compartment of the knee present the same pre-operative symptoms as patients with an end-stage grade 4 K-L OA, and that (2) those patients with d-MMRT and low-grade OA achieve the same early clinical and functional outcomes when treated with mUKA compared to patients with end-stage medial OA. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of 185 patients undergoing robotic-assisted image-based mUKA from January 2021 to July 2022 at a single Institution. We identified two different cohorts of non-consecutive patients: a group of 24 patients undergoing mUKA surgery following d-MMRT combined with K-L grades 1-3 OA (group 1), and a group of 161 patients who underwent mUKA but presenting with an end-stage bone-on-bone K-L grade 4 OA (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative clinical assessments at one-year follow-up included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L score), and a standard weight-bearing X-ray protocol. The paired t-test was used to compare clinical outcomes and radiologic values of the two cohorts and in-between the two cohorts. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean follow-up for group 1 was 16.4 ± 2.5 months, and the mean age at the time of operation was 63 ± 8.6 years with a mean time from diagnosis to intervention of 53 ± 47.5 days. Preoperative impairment was greater in group 1 compared to group 2, but with no significant difference. Postoperatively, both groups showed excellent mean outcomes at 1-year follow-up, with no significant difference. The mean preoperative HKA, mPTA, and LDFA were 176.3 ± 3.1, 88.1 ± 2.3, and 86.6 ± 1.7 respectively. The mean postoperative HKA, coronal femoral component angle, and coronal tibial component angle were 179.1 ± 2.6, 87.2 ± 2.3, and 87.2 ± 3.3. No difference was found between preoperative age, BMI, between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable early clinical outcomes were obtained after mUKA in active mid-age and elderly patients presenting with degenerative medial meniscus root tear and mild isolated medial OA. Patients with mild no bone-on-bone OA but with degenerative medial meniscus root tear and medial meniscal extrusion presented the same or worse pre-operative symptoms as patients with end-stage medial OA and benefit the same from mUKA.

Return to work following knee arthroplasty: a retrospective review in urban Asian population.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of working adults undergo knee arthroplasty in Singapore. There is limited data concerning Southeast Asian patients returning to work (RTW) following knee replacement surgery. Our aim was to identify and study factors influencing patients RTW following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: Patients who underwent TKA or UKA between August 2017 and March 2020 in our center were included in this study. Outcomes include RTW and duration prior to RTW. RESULTS: 441 patients underwent TKA (295 women, 146 men, mean age 67.3 years) and 69 underwent UKA (48 women, 21 men, mean age 61.1 years). Patients who underwent TKA returned to work earlier (mean 83.7 ± 27.1 days) compared to UKA (mean 94.4 ± 42.3 days). 90.0% of TKA patients RTW compared to 95.5% who underwent UKA. Of patients who RTW, 94.3% of the TKA group returned to employment of the same nature compared to 92.9% of UKA patients. Patients who RTW were of a younger age (p = 0.03), white collared workers (p = 0.04), and had independent preoperative ambulatory status (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Younger and independently ambulating patients may have better capacity for rehabilitation and RTW post arthroplasty surgery.

Comparison of joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the Forgotten Joint Score-12(FJS) outcomes and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the FJS after high tibial osteotomy (HTO), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with short-term follow-up (at least 2 years). Another objective of the study is to investigate the factors influencing FJS. It is hypothesized that there are differences in FJS outcomes among the three procedures. METHODS: Patients who underwent HTO, UKA, and TKA from January 2016 to December 2020 and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years were included in the study. The FJS were analyses from a cohort of people who submitted data to two years. The preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes were compared and evaluated the patient-related factor. The FJS scores were predicted using multiple linear regression analysis. Additionally, Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) questions were used as anchors to determine the achievement of the forgotten joint, and FJS MCID were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-nine patients were included in the final study, and there were 111 patients in HTO groups,128patients in UKA groups, and 150 patients in TKA groups. The mean follow-up was 47.0 months. There was a significant difference in the total FJS, between the HTO, UKA, and TKA groups (FJS:59.38 ± 7.25, 66.69 ± 7.44 and 56.90 ± 6.85, p < 0.001. We found the MCID of the FJS of HTO, UKA, and TKA were 63.54, 69.79, and 61.45, respectively. In multiple linear regression, younger age, and higher FS were significant predictors of better FJS. CONCLUSION: Medial UKA demonstrated lower patient awareness in comparison to HTO and TKA, as assessed by the FJS. Younger age and higher FS were identified as significant predictors of improved FJS, providing valuable guidance for surgical decision-making.

Better post-operative outcomes at 1-year follow-up are associated with lower levels of pre-operative synovitis and higher levels of IL-6 and VEGFA in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients.

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with inflammation, and residual inflammation may influence outcomes following knee arthroplasty. This may be more relevant for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to larger remaining areas of native tissue. This study aimed to: (1) characterise inflammatory profiles for medial UKA patients and (2) investigate whether inflammation markers are associated with post-operative outcomes. METHODS: This prospective, observational study has national ethics approval. Bloods, synovial fluid, tibial plateaus and synovium were collected from medial UKA patients in between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. Cytokine and chemokine concentrations in serum and synovial fluid (SF) were measured with multiplexed assays. Disease severity of cartilage and synovium was assessed using validated histological scores. Post-operative outcomes were measured with Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and pain scores. RESULTS: The study included 35 patients. SF VEGFA was negatively correlated with pre-operative pain at rest (r - 0.5, p = 0.007), and FJS-12 at six-week (r 0.44, p = 0.02), six-month (r 0.61, p < 0.01) and one-year follow-up (r 0.63, p = 0.03). Serum and SF IL-6 were positively correlated with OKS at early follow-up (serum 6 weeks, r 0.39, p = 0.03; 6 months, r 0.48, p < 0.01; SF 6 weeks, r 0.35, p = 0.04). At six weeks, increased synovitis was negatively correlated with improvements in pain at rest (r - 0.41, p = 0.03) and with mobilisation (r - 0.37, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Lower levels of synovitis and higher levels of IL-6 and VEGFA were associated with better post-operative outcomes after UKA, which could be helpful for identifying UKA patients in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV case series.

Higher incidence of patellar incongruence after under correction of pre-arthritic coronal alignment following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare patellofemoral joint alignment of knees with restored pre-arthritic coronal alignment versus knees with under- or overcorrection from their pre-arthritic coronal alignment following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and evaluate the effect of patellofemoral joint alignment on patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 517 knees following robotic-arm assisted medial UKA was conducted. Postoperative mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA) was compared to estimated pre-arthritic coronal alignment, using the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA). Knees were considered restored to the pre-arthritic coronal alignment if mHKA was within 2.0° of aHKA (Group 1). Non-restored knees were subdivided into > 2.0° over correction (Group 2), or > 2.0° under correction (Group 3) from the pre-arthritic coronal alignment. Patellar congruence and patellar tilt angles were compared between groups. The Kujala score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) were analyzed by group. Continuous data was compared using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Chi-squared tests were used to compare discrete variables. Logistic regressions were conducted to estimate the probability of postoperative patellofemoral malalignment. RESULTS: Group 1 included 357 knees (69.1%), Group 2 included 57 knees (11.0%), and Group 3 included 57 knees (11.0%). The prevalence of postoperative abnormal patellar congruence (i.e. ≥ 17°) was higher in Group 3 at 40.4% (p = 0.009), with a higher odds ratio of having an abnormal patellar congruence angle (2.3, p = 0.01) compared to Group 1. The prevalence of postoperative abnormal patellar tilt (i.e. ≥ 14°) was comparable between groups (n.s.). At mean follow up of 4.4 ± 1.6 years, Kujala was worse in Group 3 (76.6 ± 17.4 compared to 84.0 ± 14.9 and 85.0 ± 14.4 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively; p = 0.006). Mean KOOS, JR outcomes were comparable among groups. No significantly inferior Kujala or KOOS, JR outcomes were observed in patients across all groups with abnormal patellar congruence or tilt angles. CONCLUSION: Knees with under correction from their pre-arthritic coronal alignment following medial UKA were associated with a two-fold higher probability of having postoperative patellofemoral incongruence, as well as inferior mid-term Kujala scores compared to knees with restored pre-arthritic coronal alignment and knees with overcorrection from their pre-arthritic coronal alignment. Patellofemoral incongruence alone did not negatively impact functional outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

No difference in sports participation and patient-reported functional outcomes between total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at minimum 2-year follow-up in a matched control study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare (1) sports participation and type of sports activity between TKA and UKA patients; (2) functional outcome and activity level between TKA and UKA; and (3) survivorship of the prosthesis in both the groups. METHODS: Prospectively collected data were obtained from an arthroplasty database to identify patients who underwent primary TKA and UKA. Both the cohorts of TKA and UKA were matched, controlling for age, sex, BMI and preoperative patient-reported outcomes, which include Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score. After matching the two groups, 287 TKA and 69 UKA cases were available to be included in the study. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively at 2 years for sports participation and sports preference, patient-reported outcomes, activity levels, and improvement in knee pain. RESULTS: The mean age of the TKA and UKA groups were 75.7 ± 8.1 and 74.2 ± 8.8, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the demographic variables. Significant improvement was noted in the weekly sports participation at the final follow-up compared to preoperative sports participation in both the TKA and UKA groups (p < 0.05). All patients were able to return to their desired sporting activity. No significant difference was noted between the two groups in sports participation preoperatively and postoperatively (p > 0.05). OKS, Tegner activity level and VAS for pain demonstrated a significant improvement from preoperative to 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). However, preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the TKA and UKA groups (p > 0.05). No case of revision surgery was found at a 2-year follow-up in both groups. CONCLUSION: Traditionally, in isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis, UKA has been considered to be the procedure with better functional outcomes, but the current study demonstrates that when confounding factors are controlled, both TKA and UKA are effective, and offer similar functional outcomes and result in similar improvement in sports participation. These findings will be helpful to counsel the patients to choose the best suitable operative procedure between UKA and TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Image-based robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides high survival and good-to-excellent clinical outcomes at minimum 10 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence of revision and report on clinical outcomes at a minimum of 10 years follow-up in patients who had received a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with an three-dimensional image-based robotic system. METHODS: A total of 239 patients (247 knees), who underwent medial robotic-arm assisted (RA)-UKA at a single center between April 2011 and June 2013, were assessed. The mean age at surgery was 67.0 years (SD 8.4). Post-operatively, patients were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and asked about their satisfaction (from 1 to 5). Post-operative complications were recorded. Failure mechanisms, revisions and reoperations were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated, considering revision as the event of interest. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients (196 knees) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 11.1 years (SD 0.5, range 10.0-11.9), resulting in a 79.4% follow-up rate. Seven RA-UKA underwent revision, resulting in a survivorship rate of 96.4% (CI 94.6%-99.2%). Causes of revision included aseptic loosening (2 cases), infection (1 case), post-traumatic (1 case), and unexplained pain (3 cases). The mean FJS-12 and satisfaction were 82.2 (SD 23.9) and 4.4 (SD 0.9), respectively. Majority of cases (174/196, 88.8%) attained the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS, FJS-12 > 40.63). Male subjects had a higher probability of attaining a "forgotten joint" (p < 0.001) and high satisfaction (equal to 5, p < 0.05), when compared to females. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional image-based RA-UKA demonstrated high implant survivorship and good-to-excellent clinical outcomes at minimum 10 years follow-up. Pain of unknown origin represented the most common reason for RA-UKA revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.