Outcomes of umbilical hernia repair in cirrhotic veterans: a VASQIP study.

PURPOSE: Umbilical hernia repair (UHR) in cirrhotics with ascites is a challenging problem associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study examines the outcomes of UHR in veterans, comparing those undergoing elective versus emergent repair. METHODS: VASQIP was queried for all UHRs during the period 2008-2015. Data collection included demographics, operative details, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and postoperative outcomes. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed, and a p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, mean age was 58.9, 99.0% were males, mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.7 kg/m2, 98.2% had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ III, and 87.7% had independent functional status. More than 1/3 the patients underwent emergent UHR (37.6%). Compared with the elective UHR group, who underwent emergent repair were older, more likely to be functionally dependent, higher MELD score. Hypoalbuminemia, emergency repair and MELD score were found to be independent predictors of poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: UHR in cirrhotic veterans has worse outcomes when performed emergently. Diagnosis should be followed by medical optimization and elective repair, rather than waiting for an emergent indication in > 1/3 of patients.

Multicenter analysis of laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair with mesh: outcomes and quality of life (QoL).

INTRODUCTION: Umbilical hernia repair (UHR) is a common operation with varying surgical approaches. Laparoscopic (LUHR) and open (OUHR) operations are routinely performed, but their impact on quality of life (QoL) is not well described. Our aim was to evaluate perioperative outcomes and QoL of LUHR versus OUHR. METHODS: The prospectively collected International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for patients undergoing UHR with mesh placement. QoL was measured using the Carolinas Comfort Scale preoperatively and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Propensity match was performed controlling for hernia defect size (HDS), recurrent hernias, and BMI. RESULTS: 585 patients underwent 178 (30.4%) LUHR and 407 (69.6%) OUHR. LUHR patients had higher BMI, larger HDS, and more recurrent hernias (p < 0.05). Rates of other comorbidities were similar (p > 0.05). Tacks were used more frequently in LUHR (91.6% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), and suture was used more often in OUHR (97.1% vs 47.8%, p < 0.001). Postoperative outcomes were similar (p > 0.05) except LUHR had higher rates of seroma (13.9% vs 4.3%, p < 0.001). Overall recurrence rates trended to favor OUHR, but not significantly (4.7% vs 8.4%, p = 0.07). The propensity match yielded 138 matched pairs. LUHR had more seromas and OUHR had higher infection rates (p < 0.05). Hernia recurrence was higher following LUHR (9.4% vs 2.9%, p = 0.02). QoL data were available for an average of 457 patients at each time period. QoL was superior in the OUHR group for pain and overall QoL at each time point and activity limitations at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.05). When examining patients who were asymptomatic preoperatively, OUHR had improved one-month overall QoL, but both groups had over 90% of patients report being asymptomatic postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: OUHR is associated with higher rates of surgical site infections, but significantly lower rates of seroma formation and hernia recurrence compared to LUHR, while having superior QoL in both short- and long-term follow-up. Asymptomatic patients tend to have excellent QoL outcomes.

Umbilical hernia repair and recurrence: need for a clinical trial?

INTRODUCTION: Umbilical hernia repair, despite its perceived simplicity, is associated with recurrence between 2.7 and 27%, in mesh repair and non mesh repair respectively. Many factors are recognized contributors to recurrence however multiple defects in the linea alba, known to occur in up to 30% of patients, appear to have been overlooked by surgeons. AIMS: This systematic review assessed reporting of second or multiple linea alba defects in patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair to establish if these anatomical variations could contribute to recurrence along with other potential factors. METHODS: A systematic review of all published English language articles was undertaken using databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from January 2014 to 2019. The search terms 'Umbilical hernia' AND 'repair' AND 'recurrence' were used across all databases. Analysis was specified in advance to avoid selection bias, was registered with PROSPERO (154173) and adhered to PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty-six initial papers were refined to 10 following article review and grading. The presence of multiple linea alba defects as a contributor to recurrence was not reported in the literature. One paper mentioned the exclusion of six participants from their study due multiple defects. In all 11 factors were significantly associated with umbilical hernia recurrence. These included: large defect, primary closure without mesh, high BMI in 5/10 publications; smoking, diabetes mellitus, surgical site Infection (SSI) and concurrent hernia in 3/10. In addition, the type of mesh, advanced age, liver disease and non-closure of the defect were identified in individual papers. CONCLUSION: This study identified many factors already known to contribute to umbilical hernia recurrence in adults, but the existence of multiple defects in the linea, despite it prevalence, has evaded investigators. Surgeons need to be consider documentation of this potential confounder which may contribute to recurrence.

Spread patterns and effectiveness for surgery after ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block in adult day-case patients scheduled for umbilical hernia repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We conducted a prospective study to examine the local anesthetic (LA) spread and the effectiveness for surgical anesthesia of ultrasound (US)-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) in adult patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients received at T-10 level a bilateral US-guided injection of 20 mL levobupivacaine 0.375% + epinephrine 5 µg/mL behind the rectus muscle to detach it from its sheath. Anesthetic spread into the rectus sheath was evaluated ultrasonographically at T-9 and T-11 levels and scored from 0 to 4. The RSB was defined effective for surgical anesthesia if it was able to guarantee an anesthetic level sufficient for surgery without any mepivacaine supplementation. RESULTS: Overall, the block was effective for surgical anesthesia in 53.3% of patients (95% confidence interval, ±17.8). In the remaining patients, anesthesia supplementation was needed at cutaneous incision, whereas manipulation of the muscle and fascial planes was painless. No patients required general anesthesia. LA spreads as advocated (to T-9 and to T-11 bilaterally = spread score 4) in 8/30 patients (26.6%); in these cases, the block was 75% effective for surgery. The anesthetic spread was most negatively influenced by increased body mass index. Postoperative analgesia was excellent in 97% of patients. CONCLUSION: Use of RSB as an anesthetic management of umbilical herniorrhaphy is recommended only with anesthetic supplementation at the incision site.

Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Recent guidelines indicate the use of mesh in UHR for defects > 1 cm, as it reduces recurrence, with 10% recurrence rate compared to up to 54.5% with primary closure. However, Nguyen et al. shows that primary closure is still widely performed in UHR, especially for small defects (1-2 cm), for which there is no published data to determine the optimal approach. In addition, previous meta-analysis by Madsen et al. comparing mesh repair with primary closure in UHR didn't exclude emergency conditions and recurrent hernias; also, didn't report subgroup analysis on hernia defect size. Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the mesh repairs vs. primary closure of the defect in an open elective primary UHR. METHODS: We searched for studies comparing mesh with suture in open UHR in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Scielo, and Lilacs from inception until October 2023. Studies with patients ≤ 18 years old, with recurrent or emergency conditions were excluded. Outcomes were recurrence, seroma, hematoma, wound infection, and hospital length of stay. Subgroup analysis was performed for: (1) RCTs only, and (2) hernia defects smaller than 2 cm. We used RevMan 5.4. for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics, and random effect was used if I² > 25%. RESULTS: 2895 studies were screened and 56 were reviewed. 12 studies, including 4 RCTs, 1 prospective cohort, and 7 retrospective cohorts were included, comprising 2926 patients in total (47.6% in mesh group and 52.4% in the suture group). Mesh repair showed lower rates of recurrence in the overall analysis (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.79; P = 0.003; I2 = 24%) and for hernia defects smaller than 2 cm (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.93; P = 0.03; I2 = 0%). Suture repair showed lower rates of seroma (RR 1.88; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.32; P = 0.03; I2 = 0%) and wound infection (RR 1.65; 95%CI 1.12 to 2.43; P = 0.01; I2 = 15%) in the overall analysis, with no differences after performing subgroup analysis of RCTs. No differences were seen regarding hematoma and hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: The use of mesh during UHR is associated with significantly lower incidence of recurrence in a long-term follow-up compared to the suture repair, reinforcing the previous indications of the guidelines. Additionally, despite the overall analysis showing higher risk of seroma and wound infection for the suture repair, no differences were seen after subgroup analysis of RCTs. STUDY REGISTRATION: A review protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024476854).

Adenocarcinoma of Mullerian Origin Found Through an Elective Inguinal Hernia Resection: A Case Report.

We report an asymptomatic 59-year-old female undergoing an elective umbilical hernia excision who was found to have an ovarian adenocarcinoma within the excised hernia. Patients are rarely diagnosed with cancer after an umbilical hernia excision. An excised hernia is rarely the means for an initial diagnosis of cancer. We describe a case of an ovarian carcinoma incidentally found through an umbilical hernia excision with consequential treatment with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery with a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with a transoperative pathology report of a high-grade serous carcinoma located in the left fimbrial frond surrounded by a background of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas. This case demonstrates the need to perform histological examinations of all excised hernias, even in asymptomatic patients, as malignancy can be found inside a hernia, and it emphasizes the importance of considering adenocarcinomas of Mullerian origin in the differential diagnosis of a malignancy found in a hernia in an asymptomatic female patient.

Prolonged Ileus Due to Underlying Shigella Infection After Bilateral Open Inguinal Hernia Repair.

We present a rare case of prolonged ileus caused by underlying Shigella infection after surgical hernia repair. Infectious disease is an uncommon cause of postoperative prolonged ileus in adults. Our 48-year-old male patient underwent bilateral open inguinal hernia repair and open umbilical hernia repair without complication at an academic institution, with same-day discharge. Eight days later, he presented to the emergency department with complaints of severe cramping abdominal pain, nausea, emesis, and watery diarrhea. Physical examination, computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis, and abdominal X-ray were initially concerning for bowel obstruction. The patient was admitted to the general surgery service. Concern for ileus with underlying gastritis arose after a small bowel follow-through showed contrast eventually reaching the rectum. A subsequent gastrointestinal pathogens panel was positive for Shigella. The patient's symptoms resolved after appropriate antibiotic treatment. Shigellosis and other infectious diseases should be considered in the differential diagnosis of postoperative prolonged ileus.

Clinical efficacy of an ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block for umbilical hernia repair in calves: A prospective randomized trial.

Introduction: Surgical umbilical hernia repair is a frequent procedure in newborn calves, requiring mandatory pain management. This study aimed to develop an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) and to evaluate its clinical efficacy in calves undergoing umbilical herniorrhaphy under general field anesthesia. Methods: Gross and ultrasound anatomy of the ventral abdomen and the diffusion of a new methylene blue solution after injection within the rectus sheath were described in seven fresh calf cadavers. Then, fourteen calves undergoing elective herniorrhaphy were randomly assigned to receive either bilateral ultrasound-guided RSB with 0.3 mL/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% and 0.15 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine or 0.3 mL/kg of 0.9% NaCl (control). Intraoperative data included cardiopulmonary variables and anesthetic requirements. Postoperative data included pain scores, sedation scores and peri-incisional mechanical threshold assessed by force algometry at specific time points after anesthetic recovery. Treatments were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum, Student's t-test, and Cox proportional hazard model as appropriate. Mixed effect linear models on rank, with random effect calf; fixed effects time, treatment, and their interaction were used to compare pain scores and mechanical thresholds over time. Significance was set at p = 0.05. Results and Discussion: Calves receiving RSB recorded lower pain scores between 45 - 120 minutes (p < 0.05) and at 240 min after recovery (p = 0.02). And they recorded higher mechanical thresholds between 45 and 120 min after surgery (p < 0.05). Ultrasound-guided RSB provided effective perioperative analgesia in calves undergoing herniorrhaphy under field conditions.

Ventralex™ ST Hernia Patch Repair for Small Umbilical Hernia is Safe and Effective: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Hernia patches for umbilical hernia repair have gained popularity due to their short operation time and ease of use. However, up to 10% re-operation and 8% recurrence rates at 2-year follow-up have been published. This retrospective cohort study presents the long-term results of the hernia patch technique for umbilical hernia repair. Methods: All adult patients who underwent a primary umbilical hernia repair at Oulu University Hospital hernia surgery units during 2014-2018 were included in the study. The primary outcome measure was recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were complications and re-operation rate. Results: A total of 619 elective primary umbilical hernia repairs were performed during 2014-2018. The major technique used was Ventralex™ ST hernia patch repair (79.0%, 488/619) for small hernias with a mean width of 1.8 (SD 0.79) cm. Most of the patches (84.7%, 414/488) were placed in the preperitoneal space. Hernia recurrence rate of patient operated on using Ventralex™ ST hernia patch was 2.5% (12/488) during a mean follow-up time of 68 (SD 16, 43-98) months. Re-operation rate for another reason than recurrence was 1.6% (8/488). Clavien-Dindo complications ≥3 occurred in 4.1% (20/488) of cases and surgical site infection rate was 3.3% (16/488). Conclusion: Umbilical hernia repair using a Ventralex™ ST hernia patch placed in preperitoneal space have acceptable results in terms of recurrence and re-operations in this cohort study.

Persistent low rates of same-day umbilical hernia repair in Australia over the past 20 years: is there a need to change?

BACKGROUND: Several recent reports have identified significant variations in discharge practices following umbilical hernia repair (UHR). The primary aim of this paper is to determine Australian UHR same day discharge (SDD) rates over the past two decades. Secondary aims are to analyse factors which may contribute to variation in discharge practices, compare Australian UHR SDD rates internationally and determine LOS trends. METHODS: A retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted using de-identified data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (1 July 1998 to 30 June 2019). SDD rates and LOS were calculated for age, gender and complexity. Negative binomial models were used to investigate associations between characteristics. RESULTS: The overall mean UHR SDD rate was 41.2% with a modest improvement over the study period (36.5% to 44.4%, P < 0.0001). The mean LOS was 3.4 days, and this decreased over the study period (P = 0.01). Males had a higher rate of SDD (42.1% vs. 39.4%, P < 0.0001) and shorter LOS (3.0 vs. 3.7 days, P < 0.0001) compared with females. Increased age was associated with decreased SDD (P < 0.0001) and increased LOS (P < 0.0001). Australia's SDD rate was lower than in both New Zealand and the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION: While SDD and LOS following UHR improved across the study period, SDD rates remain below the RACS recommendation and compare unfavourably internationally. Advancing age and female gender were associated with decreased SDD and increased LOS demonstrating potential areas for improvement. Multiple strategies are discussed to address the persistently low rates of SDD after UHR.

Use of Seprafilm in a Patient With Recurrent Small Bowel Obstruction: A Case Report.

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is an emergency that should be managed early to reduce the risk of bowel perforation, strangulation and subsequent life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by sepsis. A prompt diagnostic workup including imaging and lab studies is required to assess the severity of the obstruction and to establish if emergency surgery is required. We report the case of a 55-year-old male with a history of recurrent SBO, previous ventral hernia repair and indications of previous colonic tubular adenoma per colonoscopy findings. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy procedure and adhesiolysis to release the SBO. This case report emphasizes the safety and efficacy of Seprafilm placement intraoperatively in decreasing the occurrence of postoperative adhesions in abdominal laparotomy procedures.

Opioid Prescribing and Use After Pediatric Umbilical Hernia Repair.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overuse is a concern in adult and pediatric populations. Physician education may improve appropriate opioid prescribing and patient instruction for use. Prescribing and use of opioids for pain control after pediatric umbilical hernia (UH) repair before and after surgeon education was evaluated. This is a substudy of a multi-institutional study assessing prescribing practice before and after surgeon education. This study further assessed patient prescription filling patterns and parent report of pain control. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed evaluating children who underwent UH 6 months before and after an educational presentation on opioid use. Prescriptions, prescription fills, patient medication use, and pain control effectiveness were assessed. Adverse events were collected. RESULTS: There were 78 subjects in the pre-education and 99 in the post-education group. Opioid prescribed changed from 98.7% to 61.6% (P < .0001), and nonopioid prescriptions increased following education (P = .0063). The number of opioid prescriptions filled decreased (P = .0296). There were limited data on opioid doses used and quality of pain control, but the post-education group showed good pain control. There was no difference in adverse events. DISCUSSION: Surgeon education on the current opioid epidemic and strategies for opioid stewardship improves opioid prescribing and use without adversely impacting pain control or clinical outcome.

A simple technique for neoumbilical reconstruction for congenital hernia associated proboscis deformity.

INTRODUCTION: Umbilical reconstruction in pediatric patients who have developed a large proboscoid redundancy can be challenging after standard umbilical repair. We present a simple and unique surgical technique that results in a cosmetically appealing reconstruction. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: The operation is initiated with circumferential redundant skin excision and isolation of the hernia sac. Primary fascial repair is performed. Reconstruction utilizes the cut dermal/epidermal edge by approximating it to the exposed fascia just below the skin edge outside of the fascial repair in a purse string fashion for the creation of a neoumbilicus. CONCLUSION: This simple technique is unique from any currently published methods and results in a cosmetically pleasing reconstruction without evidence of any incision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V: Expert Opinion.

Open mesh vs. suture umbilical hernia repair: systematic review and updated trial sequential meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To examine the updated evidence on safety, effectiveness, and outcomes of mesh versus suture elective umbilical hernia (UH) repair and to explore the timely tendency variations favouring one treatment over another. METHODS: MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases were consulted. A systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were conducted. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included for a total of 742 patients. Overall, 383 (51.6%) underwent mesh, while 359 (48.4%) underwent suture repair. The estimated pooled postoperative recurrence RR was 0.27 (95% CI 0.13-0.53; p < 0.001). The TSA showed a statistically significant timely tendency in favour of mesh repair with a boundary cross curve (Z = 1.96) before reaching the information size. The estimated pooled seroma, haematoma, and wound infection RR were 1.45 (p = 0.368), 0.54 (p = 0.196), and 0.71 (p = 0.375), respectively. The TSA for wound-related complications showed partial, non-significant results. CONCLUSIONS: Elective UH mesh repair seems to be associated with reduced risk of postoperative recurrence compared to simple suture repair with a statistically significant timely trend endorsed by the TSA. Definitive considerations concerning the cumulative effect for seroma, haematoma, and wound infection are premature. Further studies are warranted to endorse these results and deeply investigate the timely tendency variations.

Provider education decreases opioid prescribing after pediatric umbilical hernia repair.

PURPOSE: To improve opioid stewardship for umbilical hernia repair in children. METHODS: An educational intervention was conducted at 9 centers with 79 surgeons. The intervention highlighted the importance of opioid stewardship, demonstrated practice variation, provided prescribing guidelines, encouraged non-opioid analgesics, and encouraged limiting doses/strength if opioids were prescribed. Three to six months of pre-intervention and 3 months of post-intervention prescribing practices for umbilical hernia repair were compared. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients were identified in the pre-intervention cohort and 346 in the post-intervention cohort. The percent of patients receiving opioids at discharge decreased from 75.8% pre-intervention to 44.6% (p < 0.001) post-intervention. After adjusting for age, sex, umbilicoplasty, and hospital site, the odds ratio for opioid prescribing in the post- versus the pre-intervention period was 0.27 (95% CI = 0.18-0.39, p < 0.001). Among patients receiving opioids, the number of doses prescribed decreased after the intervention (adjusted mean 14.3 to 10.4, p < 0.001). However, the morphine equivalents/kg/dose did not significantly decrease (adjusted mean 0.14 to 0.13, p = 0.20). There were no differences in returns to emergency departments or hospital readmissions between the pre- and post-intervention cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid stewardship can be improved after pediatric umbilical hernia repair using a low-fidelity educational intervention. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Validation and educational impact study of the NANEP high-fidelity simulation model for open preperitoneal mesh repair of umbilical hernia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop, validate and analyze the educational impact of a high-fidelity simulation model for open preperitoneal mesh repair of an umbilical hernia. The number of surgical simulators available for training residents is limited. Primary for ethical reasons and secondary for the emerging pay-per-quality policies, practicing-on simulators rather than patients is considered gold standard. Validated full-procedural surgical models will become more and more important in training residents. Such models may assure that evidence-based standards regarding technical aspects of the procedures become integral part of the curriculum. Furthermore, they can be employed as a quality control of residents' skills (Fonseca et al. in J Surg Educ 70:129-137, 2013). METHODS: In a repeated measures design, medical students, residents in their last year of training and attending surgeons performed an open preperitoneal mesh repair on the NANEP model [NANEP stands for the German acronym Nabelhernien-Netzimplatation-Präperitonal (English: Umbilical hernia mesh implantation preperitoneal)]. Subjects were categorized as "Beginners" (internship students) or "Experts" (residents and surgeons). Content validity was analyzed by criteria of subject-matter-experts. Blinded raters assessed surgical skills by means of the Competency Assessment Tool (CAT) using the online platform "CATLIVE". Differential validity was measured by group differences. Proficiency gain was analyzed by monitoring the learning curve (Gallagher et al. in Ann Surg 241:364-372, 2005). Post-operative examination of the simulators shed light on criterion validity. RESULTS: The NANEP model-proofed content and construct-valid significant Bonferroni-corrected differences were found between beginners and experts (p < 0.05). Beginners showed a significant learning increase from the first to the second surgery (p < 0.05). Post-operative examination data confirmed criterion validity. CONCLUSION: The NANEP model is an inexpensive, simple and efficient simulation model. It has highly realistic features, it has been shown to be of high-fidelity, full-procedural and benchtop-model. The NANEP model meets the main needs of surgical educational courses at the beginning of residency.

Safety and effectiveness of umbilical hernia repair in patients with cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: Umbilical hernia is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis. Early studies have reported a high morbidity and mortality associated with hernia repair. The traditional approach has been to non-operatively manage umbilical hernias in patients with cirrhosis. There are emerging data suggesting that an elective repair is a preferable approach. This study examined the outcomes of umbilical hernia repair in patients with advanced liver disease and compared this with a control group of non-cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Prospective data were collected regarding the outcome of umbilical hernia repairs performed between 2004 and 2013 at the Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Outcomes at 90 days were compared between patients with and without cirrhosis. RESULTS: 79 patients with cirrhosis and 249 controls were analysed. Of the patients with cirrhosis, 9% were classified as Child-Pugh A, 61% were Child-Pugh B and 30% were Child-Pugh C. Emergency repairs for complicated hernias was undertaken in 18% of the cirrhosis population and 10% in controls (P = 0.10). Post-operative complications occurred more commonly in patients with cirrhosis (26%) compared with controls (11%) (P < 0.01). Emergency hernia repairs were associated with a higher complication rate in both patients with cirrhosis (62%) and controls (20%) (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the rate of hernia recurrence as assessed by clinical examination between patients with cirrhosis (2.7%) and controls (6.8%) (P = 0.17) nor in 90-day mortality between patients with cirrhosis (n = 1, 1.3%) and the controls (n = 0) (P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of a small study cohort and therefore an underpowered study, elective surgical repair of umbilical hernias in patients with cirrhosis, including decompensated cirrhosis, may not be associated with a significant increase in mortality when compared to a control cohort. Whilst complications are higher in cirrhotic patients, there is no difference in the rate of hernia recurrence. Emergency repairs of umbilical hernias are associated with a high complication rate in cirrhotic patients.

Management of asymptomatic pediatric umbilical hernias: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Uncomplicated pediatric umbilical hernias are common and most close spontaneously. No formal practice guidelines exist regarding the optimal timing and indications for repair. The objective of this review is to examine the existing literature on the natural history of pediatric umbilical hernias, known complications of repair and non-operative approaches, and management recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic literature search was performed to identify publications relating to pediatric umbilical hernias. Inclusion criteria comprised studies addressing recommendations for optimal timing of repair, evidence examining complications from hernias not operatively repaired, and research exploring the likelihood of pediatric umbilical hernias to close spontaneously. In addition, the websites of all pediatric hospitals in the United States were examined for recommendations on operative timing. RESULTS: A total of 787 manuscripts were reviewed, and 28 met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Studies examined the likelihood of spontaneous closure based on child's age and size of hernia defect, complications of unrepaired umbilical hernias including incarceration, strangulation and evisceration based on child's age and size of defect, incidence of postoperative complications and current recommendations for timing of repair. In addition, 63 (27.5%) of the United States pediatric hospital websites published a wide range of management recommendations. CONCLUSION: Despite the high prevalence of pediatric umbilical hernias, there is a paucity of high quality data to guide management. The literature does suggest that expectant management of asymptomatic hernias until age 4-5years, regardless of size of hernia defect, is both safe and the standard practice of many pediatric hospitals. TYPE OF STUDY: Review Article. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The Effect of Rectus Sheath Block as a Supplement of General Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patient Undergoing Umbilical Hernia Repair.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guided rectus sheath block can block the ventral rami of the 7th to 12th thoracolumbar nerves by injection of local anesthetic into the space between the rectus muscle and posterior rectus sheath. The aim of this randomized double-blind study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of the bilateral ultrasound guided rectus sheath block as supplement of general anesthesia on patents undergoing elective umbilical hernia repair. METHODS: After the hospital ethics committee approval, 60 (ASA I-II) adult patients scheduled for umbilical hernia repair were included in this study. The group I (n=30) patents received only general anesthesia. In the group II (n = 30) patents after induction of general anesthesia received a bilateral ultrasound guided rectus sheath block with 40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. In this study we assessed demographic and clinical characteristics, pain score - VAS at rest at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after operation and total analgesic consumption of morphine dose over 24-hours. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in VAS scores between the groups I and II at all postoperative time points - 2hr, 4 hr, 6 hr, 12 hr and 24 hr. (P < 0.00001). The cumulative 24 hours morphine consumption after the operation was significantly lower in the group II (mean = 3.73 ± 1. 41) than the group I (mean = 8.76 ± 2.41). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00076). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound guided rectus sheath block used for umbilical hernia repair could reduce postoperative pain scores and the amount of morphine consumption in 24 hours postoperative period.

Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Para-Umbilical Hernia- A Prospective Comparative Study of Short Term Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Para-Umbilical Hernia (PUH) is one of the most common surgical problems. Since the prosthetic repair has become the standard of practice for inguinal hernia management, the same has been adapted for para-umbilical hernia management with better outcome. There is still debate going on regarding the optimal surgical approach. There are very few prospective studies comparing the laparoscopic and open method of para-umbilical hernia mesh repair. This study compared the short term outcomes following laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of PUH. AIM: To compare the early complications of open repair with laparoscopic repair of PUH. To compare the post-operative hospital stay of open repair with laparoscopic repair of PUH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective comparative clinical study done from August 2014 to August 2016. All the patients above the age of 13 who attended our surgical outpatient department with PUH were taken into our study. Exclusion criteria included 1) Patients with obstructed or strangulated PUH 2) Patients with abdominal malignancies 3) Patients with coagulopathy, severe cardiopulmonary disease, ascites and renal failure 4) Patients who had PUH repair in combination with another major surgical operation such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair 5) Patients with recurrent PUH. Institute Ethical Committee clearance was obtained for this study. RESULTS: Out of 40 patients with PUH, 20 received open meshplasty and 20 patients received laparoscopic meshplasty. Postoperative pain and length of hospital stay is significantly less in laparoscopic PUH repair. Postoperative complications like wound infection, seroma, and haematoma are relatively less in laparoscopic group though statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic PUH repair has significantly better outcome in terms of postoperative pain and postoperative hospital stay.