Robotic Ureteral Reimplant-the Current Role.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this article is to review the current role of robotic ureteral reimplant in pediatric patients, specifically in regard to indications, outcomes, and complications. RECENT FINDINGS: Robotic ureteral reimplant has become an increasingly popular alternative to open ureteral reimplant with overall published success rates between 77-100%. In recent years, larger, multi-institutional studies have been conducted revealing lower success rates and higher complications than previously reported, but the procedure still remains safe and effective in the hands of skilled surgeons. The robotic approach offers shorter hospital stay, decreased post-operative pain, and improved cosmesis, but also results in higher healthcare costs. Robotic ureteral reimplant serves as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplant for the properly selected patient in the hands of experience surgeons.

Prolonged urinary retention can and does occur after any type of ureteral reimplantantion.

OBJECTIVE: Transient urinary retention has been recognized as a complication of bilateral ureteroneocystostomy (UNC), when performed extravesically. The objective of this study was to review a collective surgeons' experiences of unilateral extra- and unilateral and/or bilateral intra-vesical ureteral reimplanation, where urinary retention greater than 6 weeks, or what we have termed, "prolonged urinary retention" (PUR), occurred. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts to identify PUR after any open or robotic reimplant, other than bilateral extravesical, between 1998 and 2015 as reported by five surgeons. RESULTS: During the review period, ten cases were documented where PUR was encountered. Bilateral Cohen reimplants (5), unilateral extravesical open reimplant with ureteral tapering (3), unilateral Cohen reimplant (1) and unilateral extravesical robotic reimplant with tapering (1) were associated with PUR. Younger males predominated (70%). The mean age at operation of the patients was 3.1 years. Eventually 7/10 patients were able to void normally, with periods ranging from 6 weeks to 8 years. The remaining three patients are still unable to void more than 5 years after UNC. A majority of the samples (6/10) were suspected to have bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD), but neurologically all were normal. CONCLUSION: PUR can occur as a potential complication following any type of UNC and is associated with the risk of significant morbidity, including permanent urinary retention. Patients and caregivers should be counseled accordingly.

Double-J Stent Misplacement in the Inferior Vena Cava and Right Atrium: A Urovascular Nightmare.

Ureteral injury may occur during abdominopelvic surgery given its anatomic path and proximity to surrounding organs. We present a case in which a patient required ureteral reimplantation following injury during a hysterectomy. The patient underwent a seemingly uncomplicated robotic ureteral reimplantation with ureteral stent placement. However, postoperative imaging demonstrated extension of the stent from the bladder to the right atrium. It appeared that the gonadal vein was reimplanted rather than the ureter. In a combined urology-vascular surgery case, gonadal vein implantation into the bladder was confirmed. Through-and-through access from the right internal jugular vein to the urethra was established. The ureteral stent was removed and the gonadal vein was embolized, with urology follow-up for planning and scheduling of ureteral reimplantation. Vascular involvement by ureteral stents has considerable risks and often requires further surgery. Ureteral injury can occur even in the hands of experienced surgeons and has a considerable impact on patients. Recognizing important anatomy and using operative techniques to differentiate from nearby structures, such as the gonadal vein, may help in preventing ureteral injury and assisting with repair of ureteral injury. Patient summary: We describe a case in which a patient had an injury to her ureter, the tube that transports urine from the kidney to the bladder. When trying to repair this, a blood vessel (the gonadal vein) instead of the ureter was accidentally connected to the bladder. We discuss the resulting complications and management, similar cases, and important anatomy concepts and surgical techniques to prevent this type of injury.

Bilateral ureteral reimplantation at complete primary repair of exstrophy: Post-operative outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECTIVE: The value of bilateral ureteral reimplant (BUR) at the time of complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy (CPRE) has been suggested, however, outcomes are poorly characterized in current medical literature. We hypothesize that BUR at time of CPRE will decrease the rate of recurrent pyelonephritis, post-operative vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), and the need for subsequent ureteral surgery. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 64 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of classic bladder exstrophy (BE) who underwent CPRE at three institutions from 2013 to 2019.15 patients underwent cephalotrigonal BUR-CPRE and 49 patients underwent CPRE alone. Our primary outcome was >1 episode of pyelonephritis as documented in the medical record. Secondary outcomes were persistent vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), with a sub-analysis of number of refluxing renal units and presence of dilating VUR, and the need for subsequent ureteral surgery. Descriptive statistics in addition to standard, two tailed univariate statistics, were used to compare the groups where appropriate. RESULTS: BUR-CPRE was associated with a significant decrease in the rates of post-operative VUR, number of refluxing renal units, and need for subsequent ureteral surgery (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, and p = 0.048 respectively). There was a reduction in the rates of recurrent pyelonephritis and dilating reflux in patients undergoing BUR-CPRE, though it did not reach significance. Female gender was significantly associated with recurrent pyelonephritis regardless of BUR-CPRE status (p = 0.005). There were no reports of distal ureteral obstruction or other complications following BUR-CPRE. The mean post-operative follow up for the BUR-CPRE group was 46.33 (10.26) months vs. 53.76 (26.05) months for CPRE (p = 0.11). DISCUSSION: Recurrent pyelonephritis following bladder closure in patients with BE is a well-documented surgical complication, with centers performing CPRE reporting rates of post-operative pyelonephritis from 22 to 50%. Our series demonstrates similar efficacy of BUR-CPRE compared to other contemporary series and provides additional detail about need for subsequent ureteral surgeries and increased long term follow-up of these complex patients. Limitations of the study include male predominance of the cohort and lack of randomization of BUR-CPRE. CONCLUSIONS: BUR-CPRE decreases postoperative VUR and the need for additional ureteral surgery in select BE patients; it should be considered when technically feasible. While results continue to suggest a trend toward decreased recurrent pyelonephritis and dilating reflux, further longitudinal follow-up in our cohort will be needed.

Outcomes of complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation after failed ipsilateral endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic injection (EI) has been considered a minimally invasive option with high success rates. However, in clinical settings where EI has failed, and after repeat injections or worsening clinical presentation, different treatment modalities may be offered. Open ureteral reimplantation has emerged as a safe option in patients who have failed EI for VUR treatment. Currently there is limited literature describing success of complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) following primary EI for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe our surgical technique and outcomes using RALUR approach following failed EI for VUR. We hypothesize RALUR can be a safe, salvage option in patients who have failed EI for VUR in the setting of recurrent VUR or ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO). METHODS: A single site, retrospective study using electronic medical records of all patients who underwent RALUR between 2013 and 2019 following history of previous ipsilateral EI using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA) for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was conducted. Primary outcomes were radiographic resolution and/or clinical resolution. RESULTS: A total of 17 RALUR procedures were reviewed in 16 patients. There were 14 females (87.5%) and 2 males (12.5%). Seven patients had two prior EI. Median (range) age at time of RALUR was 10.1 (5.7-17.9) years, and the average time between EI and RALUR was 5.9 years [1-13]. The average VUR recurrence grade after failed EI was 3 (ranges 2-4) on preoperative VCUG. History of bilateral EI using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA), was observed in 14 patients. Surgical diagnosis at time of RALUR included persistent VUR (N = 10) or symptomatic ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO, N = 6). Mean console times were 102 min (range 70-240 min) for RALUR vs 128 min (range 70-180 min) for cases requiring ureteral tailoring. Six complications occurred in 16 patients (37.6%): Using the Clavien-Dindo classification scale, four patients (25%) were grade I, one (6.3%) grade II, and one (6.3%) was grade IIIb, which required additional procedures for ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSION: RALUR after failed EI should be considered a reasonably safe and effective surgical approach in older children with persistent VUR or acquired UVJO.

Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction.

Robotically assisted laparoscopic techniques may be used for proximal and distal ureteral strictures. Distal strictures may be approached with ureteroneocystotomy, psoas hitch, and Boari flap. Ureteroureterostomy, buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty, and appendiceal flap ureteroplasty are viable techniques for strictures anywhere along the ureter. Ileal ureteral substitution is reserved for more extensive disease, and autotransplantation is reserved for salvage situations.

Bilateral ureteric re-implant for an 18 months old boy with a huge bilateral hutch diverticulum presented with recurrent urinary retention.

Huge bladder diverticulum is uncommon but serious cause of obstructive uropathy in children. This study investigated an 18 months old boy with a huge bilateral Hutch diverticulum presented with recurrent urinary retention, underwent bilateral bladder diverticulectomy. The operative management entailed meticulous reconstruction of the lower urinary tract. Post operatively the patient restored normal voiding dynamics, and he is on regular follow up. We are reporting this case due to its rarity and to share our experience with the management and outcome in such cases.

Ureteral Reimplantation via Robotic Nontransecting Side-to-Side Anastomosis for Distal Ureteral Stricture.

Objective: To describe a novel technique of ureteral reimplantation through robotic nontransecting side-to-side anastomosis. Although the standard approach to ureteroneocystostomy has a high rate of success, it involves transection of the ureter that may impair vascularity and contribute to recurrent strictures. Our method seeks to maximally preserve distal ureteral blood flow that may reduce this risk. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a multi-institutional ureteral reconstruction database to identify patients who underwent this operation between 2014 and 2018, analyzing perioperative and postoperative outcomes. Results: Our technique was utilized in 16 patients across three U.S. academic institutions. Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 178 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 150-204) and 50 mL (IQR 38-100), respectively. The median length of stay was 1 day (IQR 1-2). No intraoperative complications or postoperative complications with Clavien score ≥3 were reported. Postoperatively, 15 of 16 (93.8%) patients reported clinical improvement in flank pain, and all patients who underwent follow-up imaging had radiographic improvement with decrease in hydronephrosis at a median follow-up of 12.5 months. Conclusions: Ureteral reimplantation through a robotic nontransecting side-to-side anastomosis is a feasible and effective operation for distal ureteral stricture that may have advantages over the standard of care transecting ureteroneocystostomy.

Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for mid and lower ureteric strictures: Experience from a tertiary center.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate our experience of laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for mid and lower ureteral stricture in a tertiary center in North India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy were performed with or without bladder flap procedures in 20 patients (13 females and 7 males) with various etiologies such as ureteric stricture, ureterovaginal fistula, endometriosis, and distal ureteric tumor at our hospital in a time frame from August 2013 to January 2017. Eight cases each presented after laparoscopic/open hysterectomy and postureterorenoscopic stone removal while two cases each presented secondary to endometriosis and distal ureteric tumor. Simple laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in 4, psoas hitch in 9, and Boari flap was done in 7 cases. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 44.2 years (range 19-65), mean surgical time was 184.25 min (115-250 min.), mean amount of bleeding was 153.25 mL (90-250 mL), and mean hospital stay was 3.05 days (2-7 days). Female-to-male ratio was 1.3:0.7. There was one conversion to open during laparoscopic Boari reimplant because of inadvertent injury to external iliac vein. The mean follow-up was 22.35 months (6-45). All the patients were asymptomatic with the resolution of hydronephrosis on ultrasound and without any significant obstruction on renal scan. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with or without bladder flap (Boari) provides good functional outcomes with excellent success rates and minimal morbidity comparable to open surgery in patients with ureteric stricture.

Unilateral open extravesical ureteral reimplanation with contralateral dextronomer/hyaluronic acid injection performed as an outpatient therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, patients with unilateral high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and contralateral low-grade or resolved VUR have been treated with bilateral intravesical ureteral reimplantation, which requires postoperative admission. If the high-grade VUR side is treated alone, then the contralateral side is at risk of developing recurrent or worsening VUR. Bilateral subureteric injection of dextronomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA) is another option that can be performed as an outpatient therapy, but a single injection is less effective for high-grade VUR. OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of an outpatient combination of open extravesical ureteral reimplantation (EVUR) and contralateral DHA injection were investigated. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of children who had concomitant EVUR and subureteric injection of DHA between January 2005 and December 2015 was performed. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis other than VUR, repeat procedures, and patients with no follow-up. Patient characteristics, postsurgical complications, and follow-up imaging were evaluated. Febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) was defined as ≥50,000 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of an organism from clean-catch or catheterized urine and temperature ≥ 101.5 F. Clinical success is defined as no fUTI for 1 year after the initial operation. Univariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for treatment failure. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 6.0 years, and 85% were female. The mean pre-operative grade of VUR was 3.3 on the EVUR side and 0.6 on the contralateral side (42% resolved before treatment). Median follow-up was 12.2 months (interquartile range, 3.1-25.4). Sixteen patients (14%) had documented fUTI within 1 year, with a clinical success rate of 86%. Of these, five had a postoperative imaging showing resolution of VUR, increasing overall success to 91%. Postoperative fUTI was more common in patients with pre-operative bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) (P = 0.003), but this was not associated with a higher reoperation rate (P = 0.168). There were 11 total complications, with three grade 3 complications. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to report safety and outcomes of EVUR and contralateral DHA injection for patients with high-grade VUR with contralateral low-grade or resolved VUR. It was shown that it is an effective and safe treatment that can be performed as an outpatient therapy. Limitations to this study include the retrospective design and the clinical definition of success that is used in a cohort of patients from across the mountain west region without routine postoperative voiding cystourethrogram. CONCLUSION: Extravesical ureteral reimplantation and contralateral DHA injection can safely be performed as an outpatient therapy and are effective in the treatment of higher grade VUR with contralateral low-grade or resolved VUR. Treatment failure is more likely in patients with BBD.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral re-implant (RALUR): Can post-operative urinary retention be predicted?

OBJECTIVE: Urinary retention following robotic-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) is proposed to be due to traction or injury of the pelvic parasympathetic nerve plexus during distal ureteral dissection. Nerve-sparing techniques have been employed to avoid injury to the pelvic plexus, either directly or indirectly. This single-center study assessed postoperative urinary retention rates after extravesical RALUR and investigated whether demographic or operative factors could predict this occurrence. METHODS: All RALUR cases entered into an Institutional Review Board-approved registry were retrospectively reviewed, and the rate of postoperative retention was determined. Postoperative urinary retention was defined as the need for catheterization at any time in the postoperative period during hospital admission or within 1 week after the operation. This included acute urinary retention episodes (AUR) as well as high post-void residuals (>50% of expected bladder capacity). Univariate analysis was performed to analyze for predictors of postoperative retention. Factors assessed included age, gender, clinical presentation, bowel bladder dysfunction (BBD), pre-operative urinary tract infection (UTI), procedure length, grade of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), and operative laterality. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients underwent extravesical RALUR in 179 ureters during the study period 2012-2016. Male:female ratio was 1:2.6. Median age at surgery was 4 years. Bilateral RALUR was performed in 52 cases (40.6%), and unilateral in 76 (59.4%). Urinary retention requiring catheterization occurred in 11 cases (8.59%). Of these, seven were post-bilateral RALUR, while the remaining four were unilateral. In seven cases, postoperative retention occurred within 24 h following RALUR. The remaining four instances occurred within 1 week, despite successful voiding in the immediate postoperative period. Univariate analysis revealed male gender (P = 0.009) and operating room time (P = 0.029) as predictors of retention. No association was found with age, weight, BBD, pre-operative UTI, grade of VUR, or laterality. CONCLUSION: Urinary retention after RALUR was an infrequent complication. When it did occur, urinary retention appeared to be secondary to covariates such as male gender and length of surgical time - possibly an indication of technical difficulty - rather than laterality of repair.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplant: A critical look at surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Published reports of outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) show mixed results that, on average, are inferior to open ureteral reimplant. We present a retrospective analysis of a prospective series of children who had RALUR from 2013 to June 2015. We hypothesized that surgical outcomes are based on identifiable risk variables. We provide a critical analysis of the relationship between patient characteristics and several surgical and non-surgical outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed the records of children who had Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic (RAL) Ureteral Reimplant (UR) at Nationwide Children's Hospital. Patient age and gender, preoperative presentation, presence of preoperative bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD), VUR grade and laterality, indication for operation, operative time, surgical outcome, surgical complications, post-operative prevalence of UTI, and pre- and post-operative status of BBD were recorded. We also recorded techniques for ureteral dissection, and closing the detrusorrhaphy. Surgical outcome was defined by post-operative VCUG. We define BBD based on publications by the standardization committee of International Children's Continence Society (ICCS). All statistical calculations were performed with STATA version 11. RESULTS: We performed extravesical RALUR on 54 children for a total of 72 ureters. Overall the study children were 74% female. The mean and median age was 5.2 and 4.9 years, respectively. Mean overall hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1.64 days. The mean LOS was 1.26 for unilateral (RALUUR) and 2.39 days for bilateral (RALBUR) surgeries and was significant (p < 0.05). Overall surgical success was 85.2% of ureters and 84.7% of children. Stratified by unilateral and bilateral surgeries, unilateral success was 91.7%, and bilateral success was 77.8% of ureters, and 72.2% of children. In the 3 failures in the RALUUR group the mean postoperative VUR grade was 1.3 from a pre-op mean grade of 3.3, whereas in the RALBUR group, the mean VUR grade among the failures was 3.0 from a mean pre-op VUR grade of 3.7. Urinary leak from ureteral injury, and urinary obstruction were more common in the RALBUR group. Post-operative urinary retention occurred in 4 children in the RALBUR and none in the RALUUR groups. Four with VUR after RALBUR and one child after RALUUR had open ureteral reimplant. Post-op UTI and non-surgical readmissions were higher in the RALBUR group. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral RALUR is associated with higher failure rates, higher complication rates, higher re-operation rates, and more postoperative UTIs and nonsurgical readmissions compared with unilaterasl RALUR.

Is There Hope for Renal Growth on Imaging Studies Following Ureteral Reimplant for Boys With Fetal Hydronephrosis and Urinary Reflux?

Reflux nephropathy is thought to be the etiology for renal maldevelopment. We present two boys with fetal hydronephrosis and sterile vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). There was lack of renal growth of the refluxing renal units on surveillance renal ultrasound. Parents elected to undergo open ureteral reimplants. Post-surgical ultrasounds demonstrated improved renal growth.

Carbon dioxide laser for detrusor tunnel creation in robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplant.

OBJECTIVE: Demonstrate and report initial results using a carbon dioxide (CO2) laser for detrusor tunnel creation in robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplant (RALUR). METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for cases of RALUR from 2011 to 2014. Patients undergoing complex reconstruction (ureteral tailoring, dismembered reimplant, concomitant ureteroureterostomy), and those who had incomplete follow-up were excluded. Variables, including use of the CO2 laser, were collected and correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: 23 patients representing 40 ureteral units were included for analysis. A CO2 laser was used in 9/23 (39%) patients and 16/40 (40%) ureteral units. Intraoperative mucosotomy was reported in 3/14 (21%) patients for the electrocautery group and 1/9 (11%) patients for the CO2 laser group. Resolution of VUR was observed in 11/14 (79%), and 9/9 (100%) of patients for the electrocautery group and the CO2 laser group, respectively. Two complications were identified in the electrocautery group of patients: ileus (Clavien 2), and transient bilateral ureteral obstruction requiring placement of ureteral stents (Clavien 3B). There were no complications in the CO2 laser group. CONCLUSIONS: Creation of the detrusor tunnel with a CO2 laser is safe and effective, and is associated with a lower rate of failure and complication in this cohort.