Gender-affirming care in urology: emergency care of the gender-affirming surgical patient-what the primary urologist needs to know.

OBJECTIVE: To present a narrative review of fundamental information needed to manage postoperative complications in patients who have undergone genital gender-affirming surgery (GAS). METHODS: A narrative review was performed using the following keywords: 'gender-affirming surgery', 'complications', 'emergency', 'postoperative'. Articles were included after being reviewed by two primary authors for relevance. Four clinicians with significant experience providing both primary and ongoing urological care to patients after GAS were involved in article selection and analysis. RESULTS: The most common feminising genital GAS performed is a vaginoplasty. The main post-surgical complications seen by urologists include wound healing complications, voiding dysfunction, postoperative bleeding, vaginal stenosis, acute vaginal prolapse and graft loss, rectovaginal fistula, and urethrovaginal fistula. The most common masculinising genital GAS options include metoidioplasty and phalloplasty. Complications for these surgeries include urethral strictures, urethral fistulae, and urethral diverticula. Penile implants may also accompany phalloplasties and their complications include infection, erosion, migration, and mechanical failure. CONCLUSION: Genital GAS is increasing, yet there are still many barriers that individuals face not only in accessing the surgeries, but in receiving follow-up care critical for optimal outcomes. Improved education and training programmes would be helpful to identify and manage postoperative complications. Broader cultural level changes are also important to ensure a safe, gender-inclusive environment for all patients.

Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing urinary dysfunction following gender-affirming genital surgery: A narrative review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Gender-affirming genital surgery is one of several surgical procedures available to transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals to improve congruence between their gender identity and sex assigned at birth. Despite increasing utilization of these procedures, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess subjective outcomes following gender-affirming genital surgery remain limited. Our aim was to provide a synopsis of PROMs currently being used to evaluate urinary outcomes among TGNB patients following gender-affirming genital surgery and to assess each PROM for content that is relevant to TGNB patients. METHODS: A multidatabase search was performed (Embase and PubMed) using search terms that included transgender, patient-reported outcome measures, questionnaire, and gender-affirming surgery. Studies that assessed subjective outcomes related to urinary outcomes and pelvic floor dysfunction following gender-affirming genital surgery were reviewed. Gender-affirming genital surgery included vaginal reconstruction (vaginoplasty) and penile reconstruction (phalloplasty and metoidioplasty). Included studies were evaluated for relevant content items and summarized in table. RESULTS: Our literature search identified 820 unique articles. Twenty-seven full articles were included in the final review. Until recently, measurement tools have been limited to unvalidated ad hoc questionnaires or PROMs developed for other conditions, such as urinary incontinence or vaginal prolapse, that are validated among the predominantly cisgender general population. Of the selected studies, PROMs used to evaluate urinary and pelvic floor dysfunction following gender-affirming genital surgery included self-construced ad hoc questionnaires (10 studies), Amsterdam Overactive Pelvic Floor Scale (four studies), King's Health Questionnaire (two studies), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20 (two studies), Sheffield Pelvic Organ Prolapse (one study), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-UI) (one study), and ICIQ-Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (one study). The PFDI-20 asked about the most relevant symptoms to TGNB patients following genital surgery; however, not all cisgender validated questionnaires included important questions about voiding position, splayed or misdirected stream. The Affirming Surgery Form and Function Individual Reporting Measure (AFFIRM) questionnaire is the first PROM for assessing subjective urinary outcomes that are validated for TGNB individuals, and the GENDER-Q is a promising new PROM with the aim of evaluating outcomes following surgical and other gender-affirming treatments. CONCLUSION: Despite recent advancements, a need remains for standardized assessment tools to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction and urinary symptoms following gender-affirming genital surgery. Questionnaires developed for the general population to assess symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse and other urinary dysfunction do not fully capture the experiences unique to TGNB individuals undergoing this type of surgery. Nonetheless, PROMs validated specifically for TGNB individuals are necessary to more accurately evaluate outcomes of gender-affirming genital surgery, allow for informed patient counseling, and create evidence-based changes to improve these interventions.

Barriers to Completing Preoperative Hair Removal for Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.

Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) is a gender-affirming surgical procedure where the skin of the penis and scrotum is reconstructed into the neovaginal lining. To prevent hair-bearing skin from becoming incorporated into the neovaginal canal, transgender patients are encouraged to undergo hair removal of their external genitalia. The goal of this preoperative hair removal is to minimize the risk of potential hair-related complications after vaginoplasty. To better support patients seeking preoperative hair removal and identify current treatment barriers, we surveyed patients about their progress and satisfaction with hair removal. A cross-sectional survey was constructed to assess patient experiences with hair removal in advance of PIV. Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 46 participated (68.7%). Both laser hair removal (LHR) and electrolysis were used. Although all patients had completed some preoperative hair removal at the time of survey (average of 14 sessions), the cohort completed only two-thirds of their total expected hair clearance. Multiple peri-procedural pain management therapies were employed, but overall satisfaction with pain management was low (57.4 ± 5.0 out of 100). LHR was associated with significantly lower procedural pain compared to electrolysis (p < .001). The average global satisfaction with the hair removal process was 57.9 ± 5.7 and incidents of mistreatment were associated with a statistically significant reduction in overall satisfaction (p = .02). Most patients felt that hair removal was important prior to surgery. Overall, LHR and electrolysis were both utilized as effective preoperative hair removal modalities; however, LHR has better pain tolerability than electrolysis.

Laparoscopic Sigmoid Vaginoplasty for the Treatment of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome in a Single Center: 20 years' Experience.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We investigate the feasibility, safety, and clinical therapeutic effect of laparoscopic sigmoid vaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case review cohort study of 56 patients with MRKHs undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid vaginoplasty in Wuhan Union Hospital between 2000 and 2020, and all patients were followed up. RESULTS: The median operating time was 165 min (120-420 min). The median hospital stay was 10 days (rang 7-15 days). A functional neovagina was created 11-15 cm in length and two fingers in breadth in all patients. No introitus stenosis was observed. No intra- or post-operative complications occurred. Two patients were lost to follow-up after 3 months of outpatient visits. Six patients had no intercourse and were required to wear a vaginal mold occasionally. None of the patients had complained of local irritation or dyspareunia. Patients who had post-surgery sexual intercourse were satisfied with their sexual life and the mean total Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score was 25.17 ± 0.63. The cosmetic results were excellent. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic sigmoid vaginoplasty can achieve the goal of making a functional neovagina. The main advantage of this surgical technique is that it is minimally invasive and that there are fewer complications post-operation. It is an acceptable procedure for patients with MRKH syndrome.

Wharton-Sheares-George vaginoplasty: a safe and efficient technique in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a condition with an underdeveloped or absent vagina and uterus due to embryological growth failure of the Müllerian ducts. Many techniques have been described to construct a neovagina with an acceptable depth that allows penetrative intercourse. This is a step-by-step video tutorial on the Wharton-Sheares-George surgical technique for vaginoplasty in patients with MRKH syndrome. METHOD: With Wharton-Sheares-George vaginoplasty, the rudimentary Müllerian ducts are incrementally dilated by pushing Hegar dilators in the direction of the pelvic axis, and the resulting median raphe is then intersected using diathermy. As a result, a neovagina is created and an estriol-coated vaginal mold is inserted for 3 days. The patient receives comprehensive discharge instructions, a self-dilation program three times a day, and a monthly follow-up. RESULTS: A 3-month follow-up showed a high subjective degree of satisfaction with surgery and sexual satisfaction in both patients. CONCLUSION: Wharton-Sheares-George vaginoplasty is a safe and efficient technique for creating a neovagina for patients with MRKH syndrome.

Long-Term Outcomes of the Restoration of Uterovaginal Continuity and Vaginoplasty-Utero-Colo-Neovaginoplasty-in Cervicovaginal Agenesis Using the Sigmoid Colon.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Congenital cervicovaginal agenesis in the presence of a functional endometrium is a rare Müllerian anomaly. The management ranges from hysterectomy historically to various reconstructive procedures more recently. We report our experience with utero-colo-vaginoplasty in the management of this anomaly and its long-term follow-up. METHODS: The case records of all the patients with vaginal or cervicovaginal agenesis in our hospital from January 2002 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were then called for an outpatient visit and examined in detail. The anatomical variations, surgical procedures and outcomes were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients aged 14 to 26 years were included during the study period. They presented with cyclical painful cryptomenorrhea. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed cervicovaginal or distal vaginal agenesis. All the patients underwent utero-colo-vaginoplasty. Intraoperative rectal injury led to post-operative faecal leak from the perineal wound in one patient in the post-operative period. Restoration of painless menstrual flow was possible in all 16 cases. Long-term complications were seen in 4 patients. These were stenosis of the perineal neovaginal orifice in 2 patients, obstruction at colo-uterine anastomosis in 1 patient and mucosal prolapse at the neovagina in 1 patient. Three of these patients needed secondary surgical procedures. Five were sexually active and reported consummation of penetrative intercourse. None of them had conceived. CONCLUSION: In our experience, utero-colo-vaginoplasty allows for regular painless menstruation and coitus with minimal long-term complications. The sole disadvantage is the failure to conceive.

Transgender women's perspectives on mental health care related to vaginoplasty for gender affirmation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe patient experiences and attitudes about the role of the mental health professional as it relates to pursuing gender affirmation surgery. METHODS: This was a mixed-models study with semi-structured interviews. Participants who presented for gender affirming vaginoplasty and had completed pre-surgical requirements but had not yet had the procedure were invited to participate in the study. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted from November 2019 and December 2020 until saturation of themes was achieved at a sample size of 14. Interviews were then transcribed verbatim and coded by theme. Qualitative analysis was performed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Almost half of the patients did not identify any barriers to obtaining mental health care, but a majority brought up concerns for less advantaged peers, with less access to resources. Some patients also felt that there was benefit to be obtained from the mental health care required before going through with surgery, while others felt the requirements were discriminatory. Finally, a large proportion of our participants reported concerns with the role of mental health care and the requirements set forth by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), and patients gave suggestions for future improvements including decreasing barriers to care while rethinking how guidelines impact patients. CONCLUSION: There are many competing goals to balance when it comes to the guidelines for gender affirmation surgery, and patients had differing and complex relationships with mental health care and the pre-surgical process.

Long-term Results of Sexual Function and Body Image After Vaginoplasty With Acellular Dermal Matrix in Women With Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term anatomic and sexual functional results of vaginoplasty with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) and to evaluate the changes in body image pre- and postoperatively in these patients. DESIGN: A retrospective study from March 2015 to September 2021. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with MRKH syndrome who underwent vaginoplasty with ADM (the MRKH group) and 30 sexually active, nulliparous, aged-matched women (the control group). INTERVENTION: The relevant data were retrospectively collected via our electronic medical record system and were analyzed statistically. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Vaginal length was assessed using a 3-cm-diameter mold. The Chinese version of the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire was used to evaluate sexual function. The Chinese version of the modified body image scale was applied to evaluate body image. The median follow-up time was 57 months (range, 13-91 months). Granulomatous polyps in the neovagina were the most common postoperative complication (7 of 42, 16.7%). Patients with MRKH syndrome can achieve long-term satisfactory outcomes both anatomically and functionally after vaginoplasty with ADM, comparable with those of healthy control women. The vaginal length in the MRKH group was comparable to that in the control group ( 8.04 ± 0.51 cm vs. 8.15 ± 0.46 cm, respectively). The FSFI scores were similar between the MRKH (26.54 ± 3.44) and control (26.80 ± 2.23) groups. The modified body image scale score was significantly decreased after vaginoplasty with ADM. CONCLUSION: Vaginoplasty with ADM is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for patients with MRKH syndrome.

Perioperative risk predictors for gender affirming surgery in the NSQIP database.

INTRODUCTION: Gender affirming surgeries (GAS), such as phalloplasty (PLPs) and vaginoplasty (VGPs), are important aspects of medical care for transgender patients. Here, we aim to better characterize patient demographics and surgical outcomes for PLPs and VGPs using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). We hypothesized that frailty indices would be predictive of perioperative PLP and VGP risk and outcomes for PLPs and VGPs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary GAS, specifically PLPs and VGPs performed from 2006-2020 were identified in NSQIP. Baseline frailty was based on NSQIP's modified frailty index (mFI) and preoperative morbidity probability (morbprob) variable. RESULTS: Fifty-eight PLPs and 468 VGPs were identified. The overall 30-day complication rate for PLP was 26%, with 17% of total patients experiencing minor complications and 16% experiencing major complications. The overall, minor, and major complication rates for VGP were 14%, 7%, and 9% respectively. Readmissions and reoperations occurred in 7% PLP and 5% VGP patients. No deaths occurred in either group within 30 days. The mFI scores were not predictive of 30-day complications or LOS. NSQIP morbprob was predictive of 30-day complications for both PLP (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.08-19.59, p = 0.038) and VGP (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.46-3.97, p = 0.0005). NSQIP's morbprob was also predictive of extended LOS for PLP patients (6.3 ± 1.3 days, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes patient characteristics and complication rates of PLPs and VGPs. The NSQIP preoperative morbprob is an effective predictor of surgical complications and is better than the mFI.

A Case Report on Hendren's Technique for Managing Symptomatic Isolated Urogenital Sinus in an Infant.

Isolated urogenital sinus is a rare anomaly. These cases may have high confluence which adds complexity to surgical correction. There are controversies regarding timing and techniques of management. We present a case report on managing such a case in an infant with bladder outlet obstruction and pyocolpos.

Postoperative adverse events following gender-affirming vaginoplasty: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study.

BACKGROUND: As a part of gender-affirming care, many transgender women undergo vaginoplasty surgery, which is increasingly being performed in the United States. There are considerable knowledge gaps about adverse events associated with vaginoplasty as most published articles report single-center results. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe severe and overall 30-day adverse events after gender-affirming vaginoplasty using a large multicenter database. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of transgender women who underwent vaginoplasty between 2011 and 2019 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Cases were initially identified by diagnosis codes for gender identity disorders and procedure codes for male-to-female vaginoplasty. Adverse events at 30 days were identified, including unplanned reoperation or readmission, blood transfusion, wound dehiscence, surgical site infections, thromboembolic disease, sepsis, cerebrovascular or cardiac events, and urinary tract infection. Surgical procedures were further stratified by Clavien-Dindo grade, a standardized classification system for registering surgical complications. A score of 0 is given if there is no adverse event, whereas scores of 1 and 2 refer to deviations from the normal postoperative course, which may include additional pharmacologic treatment, bedside-managed wound complications, and blood transfusions. Clavien-Dindo grades of 3 to 4 include surgical interventions or life-threatening complications requiring intensive care unit management. A Clavien-Dindo grade of 5 is given for any complication resulting in death. RESULTS: A total of 488 cases were eligible for inclusion in this study. The mean age of the cohort was 37.5 years, and race distribution was as follows: 71.1% White, 15.2% Black, 5.5% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 8.2% other. Of the cohort, 18.6% were Hispanic. Surgeries were performed by plastic surgeons (87.9%), urologists (8.6%), gynecologists (1.8%), and other specialists (1.6%). Concurrent nongenital surgery was performed in 17% of cases. The median operative time for all cases was 271 minutes (interquartile range, 214-344). There was no reported death in the 30-day period (Clavien-Dindo grade 5), and 27 cases (5.5%) had a Clavien-Dindo grade of 3 to 4. On multivariate analysis, body mass index and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class were associated with higher odds of having a Clavien-Dindo grade of 3 to 4 (adjusted odds ratios, 2.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.21; P=.01] and 1.23 [95% confidence interval, 0.56-2.57; P=.05], respectively). Wound dehiscence, superficial surgical site infection, or deep surgical site infection occurred in 46 cases (9.0%). The readmission rate was 4.3% (n=21). Several preoperative factors had higher odds of readmission: body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 9.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-22.13; P=.005), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (adjusted odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-9.03; P=.003), diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio, 5.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-20.45; P=.006), and hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 3.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-10.47; P=.01). The reoperation rate was 4.7% (n=23), with no significant patient factor associated with this complication. Of the reoperations, 68.2% of cases were due to wound problems, vaginal bleeding, or hematoma. CONCLUSION: In transgender women undergoing vaginoplasty for gender affirmation, severe postoperative complications were rare, occurring in 1 of 20 patients. Most patients experienced minor complications or no complication after surgery.

A single pedicled robotic peritoneal flap in penile inversion vaginoplasty augmentation.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a surgical technique to achieve greater depth of the neovaginal cavity in transgender patients undergoing scrotovaginoplasty, and to propose a method for restoring neovaginal integrity in case of lack of genital skin or reduction of the depth due to scarring after infections or ischaemic processes. METHODS: Eight patients were selected to undergo scrotovaginoplasty with scrotal graft and peritoneal flap augmentation in one operating session as a modification of Zhao's original technique. The age of the patients ranged from 25 to 65 years. The first step of the procedure was standard penile inversion vaginoplasty, avoiding suturing of the superior side of the skin cylinder. The skin cylinder was pushed into the abdominal cavity through the perineal access. Afterwards a laparoscopic/robotic approach was used: a single peritoneal flap was harvested from the posterior bladder surface, incised, dissected, pedicled on the neovaginal dome, overturned and and sutured all-round to the neovagina. The sides were adapted to obtain a 'cul-de-sac'. RESULTS: The average operating time was 6 ± 1.5 h, and patients' hospitalization lasted 6 days. There were no intra- or postoperative complications. Postoperative management was the same as that usually reported in BJUI for patients undergoing standard scrotovaginoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The use of this technique represents a good solution for increasing neovaginal depth by harvesting a large peritoneal vascularized flap, without significantly affecting postoperative management or increasing complications, as frequently observed using the colovaginoplasty technique.

Shallow-depth vaginoplasty: preoperative goals, postoperative satisfaction, and why shallow-depth vaginoplasty should be offered as a standard feminizing genital gender-affirming surgery option.

BACKGROUND: Shallow-depth vaginoplasty (SDV), also referred to as vaginoplasty without creation of a vaginal canal, is an understudied alternative to full-depth vaginoplasty (FDV), or vaginoplasty with creation of a vaginal canal. SDV is associated with fewer short- and long-term risks and shorter recovery, and does not require a lifelong commitment to vaginal dilation and douching. AIM: To describe a surgical technique for SDV that creates a dimpled introitus, together with clinical outcomes, decision-making prioritization, and satisfaction data. We hypothesize that SDV patients prioritize comparable appearance and sexual function to FDV over shorter-term risk factors, and experience high satisfaction. METHODS: We describe (1) a surgical technique for SDV; (2) the proportion of patients who underwent SDV vs. FDV, with SDV complication rates; and (3) the results of an anonymous, electronic questionnaire administered via Qualtrics that assessed SDV patient demographics, terminology preferences, prioritization of decision-guiding factors for choosing SDV over FDV, and postoperative satisfaction across various domains. OUTCOMES: A total of 110 patients underwent primary feminizing genital gender-affirming surgery at a single institution between April 2017 and July 2022: 35 (32%) of 110 underwent SDV and 75 (68%) underwent FDV. The 35 SDV patients were invited to answer the study questionnaire, of which 29 (83%) completed it (mean age 51.9 ± 16.7 years, mean body mass index 27.3 ± 5.3 kg/m2). RESULTS: All but one survey respondent met one or more of the following characteristics: (1) ≥40 years of age, (2) exclusively feminine-identifying sexual partners, and/or (3) significant aversion to performing long-term vaginal dilation and douching. Ranking of 8 decision-guiding factors revealed prioritization of long-term over short-term outcomes. Postoperatively, patients reported high satisfaction across all 3 domains. When asked if they had to choose between SDV and FDV over again, 86% reported that they would choose SDV. While 14% would choose FDV, all but one reported new interest in receptive vaginal intercourse due to finding masculine-identifying partners post-SDV surgery. A total of 27% of SDV patients experienced complications that required additional surgeries; 82% of complications were related to urinary spraying. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SDV is a lower-risk alternative to FDV and is associated with reduced postoperative maintenance and high postoperative satisfaction. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study describes the clinical outcomes of the largest documented cohort of patients to undergo SDV to date. Limitations include recall bias due to the retrospective survey and use of nonvalidated questions attributed to the paucity of validated gender-affirming surgery questionnaires. CONCLUSION: SDV's appeal to a large subset of patients (32% in this study), low complication rate, high satisfaction, and low decisional regret suggests that this surgical option should be offered to all patients seeking feminizing genital gender-affirming surgery.

Gynecological concerns and vaginal practices and exposures among transfeminine individuals who have undergone vaginoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Vaginoplasty is a gender-affirming surgery that is medically necessary for some transfeminine individuals. Little research exists describing vaginal health after the initial recovery from surgery, and evidence-based guidelines for vaginal care practices are unavailable. AIM: The study sought to describe self-reported gynecological concerns and vaginal care practices among transfeminine persons who have undergone vaginoplasty. METHODS: A total of 60 transfeminine participants 18+ years of age, living in Canada, and who had undergone vaginoplasty at least 1 year prior were recruited through social media, community groups, healthcare provider referrals, and study recontact. Participants completed a cross-sectional, online questionnaire detailing demographics, gynecological concerns, and genital practices and exposures. Hierarchical clustering was used to group participants based on behavioral practices and exposures. Associations between clusters and gynecological concerns were assessed. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included self-reported gynecological concerns within the past year, recent vulvar or vaginal symptoms (past 30 days), and behavioral practices/exposures, including douching with varied products and dilating. RESULTS: Participants reported a variety of concerns in the past year, including urinary tract infection (13%) and internal hair regrowth (23%). More than half (57%) had experienced at least 1 recent vaginal symptom, most commonly malodor (27%) and vaginal bleeding (21%). Of participants, 48% were dilating weekly and 52% reported douching in the past 30 days. Four distinct clusters of vaginal practices/exposures were identified: limited exposures; dilating, no douching; dilating and douching; and diverse exposures. No significant associations between cluster membership and gynecological concerns were identified, though cluster membership was significantly associated with surgical center (P = .03). Open-text write-ins provided descriptions of symptoms and symptom management strategies. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results provide insight for clinicians on common patient-reported gynecological concerns and current vaginal care practices and exposures, including symptom management strategies. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This was the first study to investigate vaginal health and genital practices/exposures among a community sample of transfeminine individuals. As participants self-enrolled for a detailed survey and swab collection, individuals experiencing concerns were likely overrepresented. CONCLUSION: Transfeminine individuals reported a range of gynecological concerns outside of the surgical healing period. Genital practices/exposures varied across clusters, but no clear associations between clusters and symptoms were identified; instead, practice/exposure clusters were dependent on where the individual underwent vaginoplasty. There is a need for evidence to inform diagnostics, treatments, and vaginal care guidelines to support vaginal health.

The long-term outcomes of vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa grafts in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A case series.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes for Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH) patients undergoing vaginoplasty using acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa grafts (SIS). DESIGN: A case series. POPULATION: Seventy-eight MRKH syndrome patients and a post-SIS patient who delivered a baby following the world's first robot-assisted uterus transplantation. METHODS: Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome patients were grouped based on the postoperative time and the diagnosis-surgery interval. Outcomes of sexual function and psychological status were assessed using the female sexual function index (FSFI), self-rating scale of body image (SSBI) and self-acceptance questionnaire (SAQ). Anatomical outcomes were measured by clinicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was restoration of sexual function, defined by an FSFI score in the 'good' range. Anatomical and psychological outcomes were also analysed. RESULTS: Sexual function was restored in 42.3% (33/78) of patients and the total FSFI score was 23.44 ± 4.43. Three factors (body defect, recognition of physical appearance and willingness to change physical appearance scores) in the SSBI and two in the SAQ decreased as the postoperative time increased. Based on the interval between diagnosis and surgery, the total SSBI score was lower in the short-interval group than in the long-interval group (7.25 ± 5.55 versus 12.04 ± 10.21, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of MRKH patients in our study had good long-term sexual function after SIS vaginoplasty. Sexual function and psychological status improved as postoperative time increased. In addition, reducing the diagnosis to surgery interval was associated with improved psychological function.

Updates on feminizing genital affirmation surgery (vaginoplasty) techniques.

Vaginoplasty is a gender affirming surgery performed for transgender women who desire feminizing genital reconstruction. Over the last decade, access to surgical care has improved for patients, and vaginoplasty has been increasingly performed. Several vaginoplasty techniques exist, many of which are modifications of the traditional penile inversion vaginoplasty. In this paper, we review the penile inversion vaginoplasty, the intestinal segment vaginoplasty and the peritoneal flap vaginoplasty. An overview of the techniques employed to perform these procedures is provided, as well as an update on their published outcomes and complications.

Outcomes of penile inversion vaginoplasty and robotic-assisted peritoneal flap vaginoplasty in obese and nonobese patients.

AIM: To explore the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of gender-affirming vaginoplasty. METHODS: A cohort consisting of all gender-affirming vaginoplasties in our practice between September 27th, 2018, and September 1st, 2022 were identified, and data were retrospectively collected. Patients were classified as obese if their BMI was ≥30 kg/m2 at the time of surgery and nonobese if their BMI was <30 kg/m2 . Complications were assigned a Clavien-Dindo grade and grouped as Grade ≥2 versus Grade ≤1. Patient-reported functional outcomes of intact erogenous sensation, tactile sensation, ability to achieve penetrative vaginal intercourse, and cosmetic satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients with a mean follow-up time of 6.9 months were included. Seventeen patients (mean BMI = 36.8 kg/m2 ) were classified as obese and 41 patients (mean BMI = 25.1 kg/m2 ) were classified as nonobese. No significant differences in outcomes were identified in the obese versus nonobese groups in terms of the incidence of complications. Patient-reported functional outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Similar results can be achieved with gender-affirming vaginoplasty in obese patients when compared to their nonobese counterparts. Eligibility for this procedure should not be restricted based on BMI alone.

Gender-affirming vaginoplasty: Technical considerations in patients with genital skin deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Gender dysphoria affects over 1 million American adults. Vaginoplasty is a critical step in gender affirmation, and many patients have insufficient genital skin for full-depth penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV). We reviewed the literature for technical considerations addressing this and present our data supporting the use of peritoneal flaps (Davydov technique). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive review of modern literature was conducted. Second, we present a retrospective case review of our experience with PIV, including data from procedures utilizing peritoneal flaps. RESULTS: We identified 20 original articles, including retrospective and prospective case and cohort studies. Approaches included the application of local soft tissue grafts and flaps, peritoneal flaps, and intestinal segments. Between June 2018 and February 2021, 47 patients at our institution, underwent PIV for the treatment of gender dysphoria. Nineteen of those patients underwent robotic-assisted peritoneal flap procedure in addition to PIV. In this cohort, the mean follow-up was 200.6 ± 124.8 days. Mean neovaginal depth was 13.1 ± 3.0 cm intra-operatively and 11.0 cm at the last follow-up. Twenty-six percent of complications were Clavien Grade 1 or 2; others included wound dehiscence (30.4%), perianal and urethral fistula (13.0%), and neovaginal stenosis (8.7%). The majority of patients reported satisfactory results in terms of sexual function with intact tactile and erogenous sensation. Almost half were able to have penetrative vaginal intercourse at the last follow-up. We did not aim to perform statistical calculations to compare the outcomes of PIV with and without robotic-assisted peritoneal flap augmentation, as the groups were not constructed in that manner. However, it is evident that anatomical and functional results as well as the distribution of postoperative complications seem similar. CONCLUSION: Vaginoplasty is indicated in a growing population of patients with a wide range of medical histories and anatomic variations. Genitourinary reconstructive surgeons must have several methods to achieve full-depth vaginoplasty in cases of inadequate genital skin. Peritoneal flaps serve as a versatile, safe, and functionally advantageous solution.

Patient reported symptoms and adverse outcomes seen in Canada's first vaginoplasty postoperative care clinic.

IMPORTANCE: Vaginoplasty is a relatively common gender-affirming surgery with approximately 200 Ontarians seeking this surgery annually. Although Ontario now offers vaginoplasty in province, the capacity is not meeting demand; the majority of trans and gender-diverse patients continue to seek vaginoplasty out of province. Out-of-province surgery presents a barrier to accessing postsurgical follow-up care leaving most patients to seek support from their primary care providers or providers with little experience in gender-affirming surgery. OBJECTIVE: To provide an account of the common postoperative care needs and neovaginal concerns of Ontarians who underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty out of province and presented for care at a gender-affirming surgery postoperative care clinic. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective chart review of the first 80 patients presenting to a gender-affirming surgery postoperative care clinic who had undergone vaginoplasty at an outside surgical center was performed. Descriptive analyses were performed for all variables. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 80 individuals with the mean age of 39 years (19-73). Most patients had surgery at another surgical center in Canada (76.3%). Many patients (22.5%) accessed care in the first 3 months after surgery, with the majority (55%) seeking care within the first perioperative year. Most patients (61.3%) were seen for more than one visit and presented with more than two symptoms or concerns. Common patient-reported symptoms during clinical visit included pain (53.8%), dilation concerns (46.3%), and surgical site/vaginal bleeding (42.5%). Sexual function concerns were also common (33.8%) with anorgasmia (11.3%) and dyspareunia (11.3%) being the most frequent complications. The most common adverse outcomes identified by health care providers included hypergranulation (38.8%), urinary dysfunction (18.8%), and wound healing issues (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings from chart review offer valuable insights into the postoperative needs and neovaginal concerns of Ontarians who have had vaginoplasty out of province. This study demonstrates the need for routine postoperative care in patients undergoing vaginoplasty. Patients experience numerous symptoms and concerns that often correlate with clinical findings and require multiple follow-up appointments. Health care providers may benefit from further education on the more common nonsurgical issues identified in this study.

Wound healing complications in gender-affirming surgery.

AIMS: Gender-affirming surgery consists of a group of surgical procedures for patients presenting with gender incongruence. Patients may seek treatment of anatomic areas including the face, chest, breast, and genitalia. The aim of this scoping review is to provide a general understanding of wound healing to optimize outcomes and manage complications. METHODS: A scoping review was performed to include wound healing principles, outcomes related to gender-affirming surgery, and management of postsurgical wounds. RESULTS: Based on the review performed and clinical experience, strategies to manage complications are recommended. These include an understanding of wound healing principles, patient optimization, and postoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive understanding of wound healing principles, perioperative optimization, and postoperative management of wounds assists the provider in mitigating and managing complications.