Immediate SVF-Gel Injection Reduced Incision Scar Formation: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, Self-control Trial.

BACKGROUND: Skin incision scars are cosmetically displeasing; the effects of current treatments are limited, and new methods to reduce scar formation need to be found. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether immediate postoperative injection of stromal vascular fraction gel (SVF-gel) could reduce scar formation at skin incision sites. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, self-controlled trial was conducted in patients who underwent breast reduction. SVF-gel was intradermally injected into the surgical incision on one randomly selected side, with the other side receiving saline as a control. At the 6-month follow-up, the incision scars were evaluated using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Antera 3D camera was used for objective evaluation. RESULTS: The VSS score and VAS score were significantly different between the SVF-gel-treated side (3.80 ± 1.37, 3.37±1.25) and the control side (5.25 ± 1.18, 4.94 ± 1.28). Moreover, the SVF-gel-treated side showed statistically significant improvements in scar appearance, based on evidences from Antera 3D camera. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center, single-race, and single-gender study. Furthermore, the results were available only for the 6-month interim follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Postoperative immediate SVF-gel injection in surgical incisions can reduce scar formation, and exert a preventive effect on scars. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

A comprehensive reconstruction strategy for moderate to severe faciocervical scar contractures.

The focus of treatment of faciocervical scar contractures includes cervical reconstruction and elimination of hypertrophic scars. Unfortunately, most previous studies have neglected the esthetic appearance of scars. In this study, we tried to combine surgical therapy and ultrapulse fractional CO2 laser (UFCL) to eliminate facial scars while restoring neck reconstruction and to establish the optimal conventional management for faciocervical contracture. Thirty-eight individuals were enrolled and divided into two groups. After received cervical release surgeries, comprehensive UFCL therapy group received treatment of UFCL at 3-month intervals, silicone sheets, and pressure garments, while another group only received treatment of silicone sheeting and compression. Twelve months after the termination of therapy, faciocervical scars of both two groups were assessed by two uninvolved physicians according to the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and patients' satisfaction survey was also recorded by the study participants using a patient four-point satisfaction scale. Thirty-six patients completed the treatment and follow-up. The results show that the VSS scores of both two groups decreased after 12 months, but comprehensive UFCL therapy group dropped more significantly than the conventional treatment group at follow-up session, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001), and the patient satisfaction was higher than that of the conventional treatment group. This comprehensive treatment combined of surgery, UFCL, silicone sheets, and pressure garments works as an effective and esthetic reconstruction for moderate to severe postburn faciocervical scar contractures.

The efficacy of onion extract in the management of subsequent abdominal hypertrophic scar formation.

OBJECTIVE: Development of postoperative scars is often a problem. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of gel containing Allium cepa extract, allantoin and heparin (Contractubex, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) in reducing scarring after a caesarean section by comparing it with a control group, and also intra-individually, using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). METHOD: A total of 120 patients who underwent a second elective caesarean delivery and who presented with hypertrophic scar development after their first caesarean section were included in the study. A scar revision was performed for all patients during the second caesarean operation. Patients in the study group (n=60) were advised to apply the topical scar gel postoperatively for a period of 6 months. The control group (n=60) received no treatment. RESULTS: Significant reductions were observed in the vascularity, pigmentation and height subgroups of the VSS for those in the group who continued the treatment to 24 weeks. An intra-individual analysis showed that the gel effectively reduced scarring after the second caesarean section. CONCLUSION: The prophylactic use of the gel to reduce scar development offers better results for vascularity, pigmentation and height subscales of the VSS after surgical removal of the primary caesarean scar during the second caesarean section. The results were better both intra-individually, and also in comparison with the control group and support the use of a gel containing Allium cepa extract, allantoin and heparin to reduce scarring after a caesarean section.

Effect of orange polarized light on post burn pediatric scar: a single blind randomized clinical trial.

[Purpose] This study was carried out to investigate the effect of orange filtered polarized polychromatic light on post burn pediatric scar. [Participants and Methods] Thirty children with post burn scar in wrist and hands participated in this study. They were between 3 to 7 years old, having hypertrophic burn scar ≥2 months post healing, free from concomitant skin disease and keloids. They were randomly assigned into two groups. The control group (A) (n=15) received Scar Standard Management (SSM) protocol and the study group (B) (n=15) received SSM protocol along with 15 min/area polarized light with medical range filter followed by 15 min/area orange filtered polarized light. All children received the study protocol once a day, 3 times/week for one month. Scar assessment was done before and after the study protocol by using Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). [Results] All participated children were analyzed. Comparison of post treatment results between groups revealed significant improvement of post burn scar for both groups with significant difference in favor to the study group. [Conclusion] Ultimately it was revealed that Orange filtered polarized light has a special and beneficial effect on decreasing post burn pediatric scar.

Fractional CO2 laser treatment of caesarean section scars-A randomized controlled split-scar trial with long term follow-up assessment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Caesarean section (c-section) scars can be pose functional and cosmetic challenges and ablative fractional laser (AFXL) treatment may offer benefit to patients. We evaluated textural and color changes over time in AFXL-treated versus untreated control scars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, controlled, intra-individual split-scar trial with three sessions of AFXL-treatments for mature c-section scars. Settings of AFXL were adjusted to each individual scar. End-points were blinded on-site clinical evaluations at 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale [POSAS] and Vancouver Scar Scale [VSS]), blinded photo-evaluations, reflectance measurements, tissue histology, and patients satisfaction. RESULTS: Eleven of 12 patients completed the study. At 1 month follow-up, AFXL-treated scars were significantly improved in pliability (POSAS P = 0.01 VSS P = 0.02) and smoother in surface relief (POSAS P = 0.03) compared to control scars. At 1-3 months, overall scar appearance was dominated by transient erythema and hyperpigmentation, confirmed by reflectance measurements (erythema% and pigmentation% peaked at 1 and 3 month follow-up, respectively). At 6 months follow-up, AFXL-treated scars improved on POSAS-total score though not significantly (P = 0.06). Correspondingly, blinded photo-evaluation found AFXL-treated scars significantly improved compared to controls (VAS P = 0.02). Histology indicated new dermal collagen and elastic fibers on AFXL-treated scars. At 6 months follow-up, a majority of patients (64%) favored subsequent AFXL-treatment of their untreated control scar tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Scar remodeling is initiated 1 month after AFXL treatment, but overall scar improvement is concealed until laser-induced color changes resolve. At 6 months follow-up, the benefit of AFXL treatment on c-section scars emerges. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:189-197, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ultrapulsed fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: evaluation of an in-patient controlled, standardized treatment approach.

In this study, we aimed to quantify the effects of fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser therapy in the treatment of widespread hypertrophic burn scars. While many different pilot studies have described the potential of the technology and expert groups and current guidelines, alike, recommend its use, the level of evidence for the efficacy of fractional CO2-laser treatment for burn scars is currently very low. Ten patients (three male, seven female) with hypertrophic burn scars were treated with a single course of fractional CO2-laser therapy in an in-patient controlled setup, using a standardized treatment paradigm. Documentation was based on modern scar scales and questionnaires, like the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), as well as state of the art clinical measurements (PRIMOS, Cutometer). Over the course of 6 months after treatment, VSS and POSAS scores showed significant improvement in the rating of scar parameters, as did the quality of life rating according to the DLQI. In the treated scars, surface relief improved significantly, as S max decreased by 1893 µm (-36.92%) (p = 0.0273) and S z by 1615 µm (-36.37%) (p = 0.0488). Scar firmness in treated scars could be reduced by 30% after one treatment session, as R 0 improved by 0.0797 mm (+30.38%) (p = 0.0212). Fractional ablative CO2-laser treatment is a safe and efficacious option for the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars. While more treatment sessions are required for satisfying results, significant improvement is already apparent after a single course of treatment.

Effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Autologous Split-Thickness Skin Graft in Treatment of Deep Tissue Defect: Esthetic Subjective and Objective Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: A split-thickness skin graft (STSG) is performed to cover a large full-thickness skin defect. Esthetic and functional deficits can result, and many studies have sought to overcome them. This study compared the effectiveness of the acellular dermal matrix (ADM) graft and STSG concerning esthetic and functional effectiveness of ADM on scar quality. METHODS: Of the patients who underwent anterolateral thigh free flap from 2011 to 2015, patients who received skin graft only (n = 10) or skin graft with ADM (n = 20) for coverage of the donor site were enrolled. In all cases, autologous STSG was performed with 1:1.5 meshed 0.008-0.010-inch-thick skin. In the skin graft with ADM group, 0.008-0.013-inch-thick meshed ADM (CGderm®; CGBio, Inc., Seungnam, Korea) was co-grafted. Negative-pressure wound therapy (CuraVAC®; CGBio, Inc., Seungnam, Korea) was applied to both groups in continuous mode at -120 mmHg. We investigate early outcomes (skin loss rate, duration of negative-pressure wound therapy, days to removal of stitches, days to achieve complete healing, and complications) and late outcomes in terms of scar quality (vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height) and graft-related symptoms (itching sensation and pain). Assessments used the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Skin fold was measured to evaluate the elasticity of scar tissue. RESULTS: In the Vancouver Scar Scale, vascularity subscore (p = 0.003) and total score (p = 0.016) were significantly lower in the skin graft with ADM group. In Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, the pain (p = 0.037) and stiffness subscores (p = 0.002), and total score (p = 0.017) were significantly lower in the skin graft with ADM group. CONCLUSIONS: Skin graft with ADM results in better scar quality in objective and subjective aspects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Effect of intense pulsed light on immature burn scars: A clinical study.

INTRODUCTION: As intense pulsed light (IPL) is widely used to treat cutaneous vascular malformations and also used as non-ablative skin rejunuvation to remodel the skin collagen. A study has been undertaken to gauze the effect of IPL on immature burn scars with regard to vascularity, pliability and height. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted between June 2013 and May 2014, among patients with immature burn scars that healed conservatively within 2 months. Photographic evidence of appearance of scars and grading and rating was done with Vancouver Scar Scale parameters. Ratings were done for both case and control scar after the completion of four IPL treatment sessions and were compared. RESULTS: Out of the 19 cases, vascularity, pliability and height improved significantly (P < 0.05) in 13, 14 and 11 scars respectively following IPL treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intense pulsed light was well-tolerated by patients, caused good improvement in terms of vascularity, pliability, and height of immature burn scar.

Comparison of combination skin substitutes and skin grafts versus skin grafts only for treating wounds measured by Vancouver Scar Scale: A comprehensive meta-analysis.

Background: Skin is the largest organ in the body and has multiple significant functions. A malformation or injury that compromises its integrity can lead to major issues or even mortality. Wound healing is a vital physiological process of the human skin which facilitates the repair of any damage and the preservation of homeostasis. Possible complications or infections that are fatal may ensue if the patient does not recover within the specified time. Therefore, it is essential to develop biomaterials which facilitate tissue regeneration and exhibit robust biological properties. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare combinations of skin replacements and skin grafts to skin grafts alone for wound treatment, as measured by the Vancouver Scar Scale. Methods: This meta-analysis utilized various databases, including as PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and ClinicalTrials.gov, to conduct a comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials that compared the effectiveness of combined skin substitutes and skin grafts to skin grafts alone in the treatment of wounds. The results primarily consisted of scar features assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale. Results: Meta-analysis was conducted on a sample of 216 participants from 7 randomized controlled trials. The trials were conducted from 2002 to 2015. The study demonstrated that the use of skin substitutes resulted in a statistically significant improvement in Vancouver Scar Scales ratings compared to skin grafts alone. The mean change was 1.38 (95% CI: 0.13-2.63; p = 0.03). Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that the use of skin replacements provides substantial advantages and effectively aids in the closure of wounds. There is no inherent superiority among different skin substitutes. Instead, their suitability for specific patient wound circumstances is the determining factor. A comprehensive and advantageous skin substitute of significant magnitude is needed, rather than relying solely on grafts.

Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Resection of Dorsal Wrist Ganglion with a Minimum of 3 Years Follow-up.

Introduction Ganglion cysts are the most common benign tumors of the wrist. Their arthroscopic resection is becoming common. However, there are a limited number of studies comparing arthroscopic and open surgeries. This study evaluated the subjective and objective results of arthroscopy with a minimum of 3 years follow-up. Patients and Methods Patients with dorsal wrist ganglion who underwent arthroscopic ganglionectomy were evaluated regarding pain (using visual analog scale) and satisfaction as subjective results. We also evaluated their scar (with the Vancouver scar scale), range of motion, and recurrence as objective results. Results There were 20 patients in the study. Mean of follow-up time was 52.5 months. Recurrence rate was 5%, and visual analog scale of pain decreased from 3.7 to 0.5 at the final follow-up. Sixteen patients were completely satisfied, three patients were partially satisfied, and one patient was unsatisfied. The mean of Vancouver scar scale was 1.4 (range of 0-3). Improvement in range of flexion and extension of the wrist was significant without a significant complication. Conclusion Arthroscopic excision of dorsal wrist ganglion in the way described in this study is a safe and effective method that improves pain and range of motion of the wrist without major complications. The rate of recurrence was less than those reported for open surgery in long-term follow-up. The surgery scar has a promising score in Vancouver scar scale.

Mid-Term Follow-Up Study of Children Undergoing Autologous Skin Transplantation for Burns.

Deep partial and full-thickness burns require surgical treatment with autologous skin grafts after necrectomy, which is the generally accepted way to achieve permanent wound coverage. This study sought to examine the grafted and donor areas of children who underwent autologous skin transplantation, using two assessment scales to determine the severity of the scarring and the cosmetic outcome during long-term follow-up. At the Surgical Unit of the Department of Paediatrics of the University of Pécs, between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019, children who had been admitted consecutively and received autologous skin transplantation were analyzed. Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria in this retrospective cohort study. The authors assessed the results using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). There was a significant difference in how parents and examiners perceived the children's scars. In the evaluation of the observer scale, the most critical variables for the area of skin grafted were relief and thickness. Besides color, relief was the worst clinical characteristic on the patient scale. However, when medical professionals evaluated the donor site, significantly better results were obtained compared to the transplanted area (average observer scale score: 1.4 and 2.35, p = 0.001; VSS: 0.85 vs. 2.60, p < 0.001), yet it was similar to the graft site in the parents' opinion (Patient Scale: 2.95 and 4.45, p = 0.181).

Minimally Invasive Harvesting Technique for Costal Cartilage Graft: Donor Site, Morbidity and Aesthetic Outcomes.

Cartilage grafts are well-known as being reliable in reconstructive surgery for craniofacial pathologies. The aim of this study is to describe a new technique which requires an incision smaller than 1.5 cm but is still effective for harvesting cartilage graft. Thirty-six patients who underwent costal cartilage harvesting for septorhinoplasty have been included in this study, admitted from January 2018 to December 2021. Out of 36 patients, 34 have not reported any major complications, and two cases were followed up for pneumothorax. There were no infections and no chest wall deformities. All patients reported minimal pain at the donor site. The Vancouver Scar Scale was used to evaluate the entity of the postoperative scarring phenomena. This scale total ranges from 0 (representing normal skin) to a maximum score of 13 (representing worst scar imaginable). The results were 1.53 SD ± 0.64 (on average) 1 week after the surgical procedure and 1.28 SD ± 0.45 (on average) at the 6 months follow-up. This minimally invasive method provided a valid and effective surgical technique for cartilage graft. Despite the limitations of the case series, it seems that this procedure might be comparable to other and well-established traditional procedures and could be even preferred when the minimal invasiveness is mandatory.

Correlation between Collagen Type I/III Ratio and Scar Formation in Patients Undergoing Immediate Reconstruction with the Round Block Technique after Breast-Conserving Surgery.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the collagen type I/III ratio and scarring in patients who underwent immediate reconstruction with the round block technique (RBT) after breast conservation surgery. Seventy-eight patients were included, and demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. The collagen type I/III ratio was measured using immunofluorescence staining and digital imaging, and scarring was assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). The mean VSS scores were 1.92 ± 2.01 and 1.79 ± 1.89, as assessed by two independent plastic surgeons, with good reliability of the scores. A significant positive correlation was found between VSS and the collagen type I/III ratio (r = 0.552, p < 0.01), and a significant negative correlation was found between VSS and the collagen type III content (r = -0.326, p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the collagen type I/III ratio had a significant positive effect on VSS (ß = 0.415, p = 0.028), whereas the collagen type I and collagen type III content had no significant effect on VSS. These findings suggest that the collagen type I/III ratio is associated with scar development in patients undergoing RBT after breast conservation surgery. Further research is needed to develop a patient-specific scar prediction model based on genetic factors affecting the collagen type I/III ratio.

Post-operative Scar Comparison With Supraorbital Eyebrow and Upper Blepharoplasty Approach in the Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures.

Study Design: A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the postsurgical scar with Supraorbital Eyebrow (SE) Approach and Upper Blepharoplasty (UB) Approach used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. Objective: To evaluate and compare the post-operative scar using Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) following ORIF of ZMC fractures with SE and UB approaches. Methods: In this study, 88 patients with ZMC fractures requiring ORIF and meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited between 2019 and 2020. Patients were randomly divided into SE and UB group, 44 patients in each. Clinical and radiological assessment was done preoperatively and post-operative scar evaluation was carried out at different intervals over a period of 6 months using VSS. A blinded observer rated the scar. Results: The results showed that after 6 months of surgery, all the 44 (100%) patients in UB group had a mild scar (VSS score 1-5), while in the SE group 34 (77.3%) patients had a mild scar (VSS score 1-5) and 10 (22.7%) had a moderate scar (VSS score 6-10). The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P-value = .001). Conclusions: The UB approach has been established to be superior to SE approach in terms of post-operative scar as the results were statistically significant. This study can be used to advocate more frequent use of UB approach as compared to the previously popular SE approach for the management of ZMC fractures.

Long-term results of split-thickness skin grafting with and without additional dermal matrix in severe traumatic soft tissue defects of the lower limb.

PURPOSE: Aim of this study was to compare the use of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) with and without additional MatriDerm® application in a predominantly one-step procedure for the treatment of severe traumatic soft tissue defects of the lower limb. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients treated in a European level I trauma center between June 2013 and July 2018 in terms of a severe traumatic soft tissue defect of the lower extremity using STSG alone or in combination with the acellular dermal substitute MatriDerm®. The healing of the soft tissue defect was measured by assessment of the take rate. Outcome quality of the scar tissue was assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale. RESULTS: A total of 147 cases were included in this study. The overall healing rate (number of patients with take rate ≥ 75%) was 88/147 (60%) and did not demonstrate significant differences between the treatment groups (p = 0.15). Despite the difference in wound complexity between the treatment groups, there was no difference regarding the scar tissue quality 12 months postoperatively. In about 25% of all cases, a post-operative event was mentioned that had to be revised surgically. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment with STSG and additional MatriDerm® application can be recommended as satisfactory alternative for dermis replacement in patients with severe skin defects, independent of age. The additional MatriDerm® use allows for bridging of exposed ligaments, tendons, vessels or bones without relevant differences in cosmetical outcome.

Analysis of the predictors of hypertrophic scarring pain and neuropathic pain after burn.

INTRODUCTION: Burn hypertrophic scarring pain is a common and perennial complaint which not only affects patients' quality of life, but also their recovery and reintegration. Physical therapy and medicine regimens are all available for the treatment of hypertrophic scarring pain. Unfortunately, the efficacy of clinical practice is not very satisfactory and the management of hypertrophic scarring pain remains challenging. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to explore the risk factors for hypertrophic scarring pain and further identify whether it is neuropathic pain, aiming to guide the clinical therapy and help patients live a pain-free life. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients with postburn hypertrophic scarring pain between 2017 and 2020 in a burn center in Shanghai. Research objects were included strictly according to the inclusion criteria and every enrolled patient was included in the study only once. Demographic information, burn and scar characteristics, and pain scores were collected through the Changhai Hospital Medical Information System, patient questionnaire and physician assessment. Using SPSS 26.0 software, the data were first processed by descriptive statistics, and linear and logistic regression analyses were further employed to explore the significant factors. RESULTS: The sample involving 123 patients was consisted of 56.9% males, 79.7% caused by fire with a median age 40.5 years, total body surface burn-area (TBSA) 44.4%, wound healing time of target scar 57.9 days, hyperplasia time 9.3 months and the scar location mainly in the limbs (55.3%). Of all the included objects, the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) total, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, brief pain inventory (BPI) total and the percentage of neuropathic pain were 9.6, 3.3, 36.0 and 74.8%, respectively. Integrating covariates with a P value of <0.10 through preliminary univariate analysis, multivariable linear regression showed sex (P = 0.049), age (P = 0.020), target scar location (P = 0.017, P = 0.254), and pliability (P = 0.016) were linked with severe VAS score; and burn depth of target scar (P = 0.023), hyperplasia time (P = 0.027, P = 0.001), vascularity (P = 0.028), and pliability (P = 0.001) were associated with higher BPI score. Adjusting for potential confounders, hyperplasia time (P = 0.005, P = 0.039) was found to be the only independent risk factor for hypertrophic scarring neuropathic pain in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, with mVSS total of P = 0.062. CONCLUSIONS: The model in our study has clarified that sex, age, target scar location, burn depth of target scar, hyperplasia time, and vascularity, especially pliability, may provide excellent prediction of hypertrophic scarring pain outcome; for neuropathic pain, only hyperplasia time has further prospects, with mVSS total as a potential forecast. In an era increasingly aware of life quality, this work may contribute to the elaboration of strategies to hypertrophic scarring pain management, provide an individualized therapy, and help patients live a pain-free life.

Evaluation of burned hand function after enzymatic debridement.

Hand burns are common injuries that can result in long-term impairment of hand function. Enzymatic debridement (ED) prevents damage to the viable dermis due to the procedure's selectivity and has become an option for obtaining an accurate depth assessment and enabling wound re-epithelialization with less skin graft use. We conducted a prospective study from July 2015 to July 2018, which enrolled patients with deep partial-thickness hand burns and treated them with ED using bromelain. After a specified period, we assessed the patients' hand function, using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) to assess their disabilities and activities of daily life, respectively. We assessed the hand joint range of motion using a goniometer and assessed scar quality with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). We analyzed 72 patients with 90 burned hands at 3 months and, at the final assessment, 69 patients with 86 burned hands. Fire was the most common cause of the burns. Bromelain allowed for early debridement (73.6% during the first 24 h). At the 3-month evaluation, the mean DASH and MHOQ scores were 2.35 and 97.9%, respectively, with a high inverse correlation between the 2 types of scores (Spearman's rho, -0.78; p < .001). The mean wrist flexion and extension were 85.7 and 80°, respectively, the mean metacarpophalangeal flexion was 88.3°, the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) flexion was 112.9°, and the thumb opposition was 77°. The mean VSS score was 2.87. At the final evaluation, with a minimum follow-up of 391 days, the mean DASH and MHOQ scores were 0.18 and 99.71%, respectively. ED with bromelain in deep partial-thickness hand burns resulted in normal values at 3 months and at over 1 year of follow-up, with complete restoration of function and quality of life and good scar results.

The impact of closed incisional negative pressure therapy on anterior lateral thigh flap donor site healing and scarring: A retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether closed incisional negative pressure therapy (cINPT) is suitable to improve anterior lateral thigh (ALT) flap donor site healing and scarring. METHODS: We identified 271 ALT free flaps of widths between 7 and 9 cm and primary donor site closure performed between January 2012 to December 2019. Patients were divided into cases of cINPT versus controls without cINPT as part of this retrospective case-control review. We compared the incidences of postoperative donor site complications (wound dehiscence, infection, seroma, hematoma) and the degree of scarring severity using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales (POSAS). RESULTS: A total of 106 ALT donor sites received cINPT (39%), whereas the remaining 165 donor sites received conventional dressings (61%). The distribution of gender, age, body mass index, comorbidities, and mean flap sizes were comparable between both groups. The occurrence of surgical wound dehiscence was significantly lower in the cINPT group (2.8%), when compared to controls (9.0%) (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the mean length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the cINPT group (19 ± 8 days versus 21 ± 11 days; p = 0.03). CINPT was associated with a more favorable donor site scar quality when assessed by VSS (p = 0.03) and POSAS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The use of cINPT was associated with significantly less ALT donor site complications and superior scar quality accelerating patients' postoperative recovery.

A combined protocol for improving reconstruction of scrotal skin avulsions: The experience of the University Hospital Center of Foggia.

OBJECTIVE: Scrotal degloving injuries are rare and constitute a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. The authors describe their successful experience with a combined reconstruction protocol using an acellular dermal matrix (ADM), negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and a split-thickness skin graft (STSG), and the retrospective assessment of overall morbidity and esthetic outcomes. METHODS: Five consecutive patients underwent a wide excision of necrotic scrotal skin and a reconstruction procedure using a combined protocol with NPWT, Pelnac®, and STSG. The efficacy of this treatment was determined by assessing overall morbidity and esthetic outcomes with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). RESULTS: The combined protocol made it possible to create an environment that promoted wound healing, improved graft intake, and gage the reconstructed site a more natural look. No significant problems were observed. Satisfactory cosmetic and functional results were obtained in all patients as shown by VSS scores obtained. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that this combined protocol is a reliable alternative to flaps and should be considered an excellent option in scrotal reconstruction, especially in critical patients.

Two-stage skin grafting using a basic fibroblast growth factor-impregnated artificial dermis.

For traditional artificial dermises, a waiting period of approximately three weeks is required after the first implantation before they are adequately vascularized. The objective of this retrospective case series was to investigate whether full-thickness skin defects, requiring surgical reconstruction, could be successfully treated by implantation of a basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)-impregnated artificial dermis and secondary skin grafting with a shorter waiting period. Between January 2019 and January 2021, 19 skin defects in 14 patients (7 male and 7 female) were treated with two-stage skin grafting using bFGF-impregnated collagen-gelatin sponge (CGS). All of them were included in this case series, and the waiting period for skin grafting, success rate of skin grafting, infection during the waiting period, and scar quality 6-12 months postoperatively were retrospectively investigated. As a result, all skin grafting surgeries were successfully performed with a waiting period of 13.3 ± 4.3 days. Infection during the waiting period was observed in three lesions (15.8%); however, all infections were controllable. Postoperative scar quality was acceptable (Vancouver Scar Scale score range, 1-8). In conclusion, compared to traditional artificial dermises, bFGF-impregnated CGSs have the potential to shorten the waiting period without decreasing the success rate of skin grafting. Further studies are required to confirm this finding.