Differential properties of Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Janus kinases (JAKs) are a family of cytosolic tyrosine kinases that regulate cytokine signal transduction, including cytokines involved in a range of inflammatory diseases, such as RA, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and IBD. Several small-molecule JAK inhibitors (JAKis) are now approved for the treatment of various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. There are, however, key differences between these agents that could potentially translate into unique clinical profiles. Each JAKi has a unique chemical structure, resulting in a distinctive mode of binding within the catalytic cleft of the target JAK, and giving rise to distinct pharmacological characteristics. In addition, the available agents have differing selectivity for JAK isoforms, as well as off-target effects against non-JAKs. Other differences include effects on haematological parameters, DNA damage repair, reproductive toxicity and metabolism/elimination. Here we review the pharmacological profiles of the JAKis abrocitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib.

Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and comorbid allergies.

BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib efficacy by comorbidity status in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not been previously assessed. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with AD and allergic comorbidities. METHODS: Data were pooled from patients who received abrocitinib 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo in phase 2b (NCT02780167) and phase 3 (NCT03349060, NCT03575871) monotherapy trials. Patients with and without allergic comorbidities (allergic asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, or food allergy) were evaluated for Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response (clear [0] or almost clear [1]), ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) response (<2 with baseline score ≥2). Other outcomes were Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Of 942 patients, 498 (53%) reported at least one allergic comorbidity (asthma only, 33%; conjunctivitis only or rhinitis only or both, 17%; food allergies only, 15%; >1 allergic comorbidity, 34%). Regardless of comorbidity status, from Week 2 to Week 12, higher percentages of patients treated with either abrocitinib dose achieved IGA 0/1, EASI-75, PP-NRS4, or DLQI 0/1 versus placebo-treated patients. Changes from baseline in POEM, SCORAD, and PSAAD were greater with abrocitinib than with placebo in patients with and without allergic comorbidities. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety data support abrocitinib use to manage AD in patients with or without allergic comorbidities.

Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in the treatment of pediatric AD. RECENT FINDINGS: Adolescents with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis (AD) need systemic therapies, as stated several recent practice guidelines. (JAKi) have shown their efficacy in the treatment of adult AD, however, there is a lack of information concerning efficacy and safety of their use in pediatric AD. We found that the JAKi's abrocitinib (ABRO), baricitinib (BARI), and upadacitinib (UPA), are all an effective treatment option with a very fast onset of action for adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. BARI was not effective in children between 2 and 10 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Fortunately, major safety issues with JAKi in adolescents with AD have not been documented in the trials, so far, contrasting with the reports in adults with AD, where these events have very rarely occurred. There are some reports of herpes zoster (HZ) infection in adolescents on JAKi, but it is not a major safety concern. Acne is a relatively common AE with UPA in adolescents; however, it is responsive to standard treatment. This review will help the clinician to choose among the JAKi according to the needs and clinical features of patients with moderate and severe AD. In the following years, with the advent of new biologicals and JAKi, these therapies will fall into place in each phase of the evolution of patients with AD.

Abrocitinib Provides Rapid and Sustained Improvement in Skin Pain and Is Associated with Improved Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult and Adolescent Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Skin pain in atopic dermatitis (AD) increases with disease severity and is associated with substantial quality of life (QoL) burden. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate abrocitinib efficacy on skin pain and QoL in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included data with abrocitinib administered as monotherapy (pooled phase 2b [NCT02780167] and phase 3 JADE MONO-1 [NCT03349060] and JADE MONO-2 [NCT03575871]) or in combination with topical therapy (phase 3 JADE COMPARE [NCT03720470] and JADE TEEN [NCT03796676]). Patients received oral, once-daily abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, or placebo for 12 or 16 weeks (JADE COMPARE). Skin pain was rated using the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) skin pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) item ("How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?") on a scale from 0 (not painful) to 10 (extremely painful). Itch (Peak Pruritus NRS) and QoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index or Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index) were assessed. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline was analyzed using mixed-effects repeated measures modeling. RESULTS: A total of 1,822 patients (monotherapy pool, n = 942; JADE COMPARE, n = 595; and JADE TEEN, n = 285) were analyzed. LSM change from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score was significantly greater with abrocitinib versus placebo from week 2 through week 12 or 16 across all 3 study populations and occurred in a dose-dependent manner. A greater proportion of patients achieved a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score with abrocitinib (200 mg and 100 mg) versus placebo in the monotherapy pool (56% and 38% vs. 12%; week 12), JADE COMPARE (72% and 52% vs. 26%; week 16), and JADE TEEN (51% and 60% vs. 31%; week 12). Additionally, a greater proportion of patients achieved a stringent threshold of skin pain improvement (PSAAD skin pain score <2) with abrocitinib versus placebo. Adults and adolescents who achieved a ≥4-point improvement in skin pain reported greater QoL improvement than those who did not achieve a ≥4-point improvement. A positive correlation (≥0.3) was observed between skin pain and QoL and separately between skin pain and itch across the 3 study populations. CONCLUSION: Abrocitinib as monotherapy or in combination with topical therapy improved skin pain and was associated with improved QoL in both adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD across all evaluated studies.

Synthesis of organic solvent-free nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots as unique green fluorimetric probes for analysis of abrocitinib in human plasma.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a persistent, inflammatory skin condition that impacts approximately 15 to 20% of children and 1 to 3% of adults globally. Common skin manifestations include papules, papulovesicular, and brown or red patches with swelling, crusting, and flaking. Therefore, the drug abrocitinib (ABR) was approved by the US FDA as an oral treatment for atopic dermatitis. The present study outlines the development of innovative, thermostable, and pH-stable organic solvent-free nitrogen-doped carbon dots (N@CQDs) synthesized through a one-step method for evaluating ABR with a notable quantum yield of 33.84% to minimize the use of organic solvents. Their cost-effectiveness, eco-friendly characteristics, and outstanding photocatalytic properties have established them as a promising alternative to conventional luminescent techniques like fluorescent dyes and luminous derivatization technique. The reaction of ABR with N@CQDs led to a significant decrease in the luminescent response of the produced green and stable carbon quantum dots at 513 nm. The detection range was determined to be 1.0-150.0 ng mL-1, with a lower limit of quantitation (LOQ) equal to 0.52 ng mL-1 based on the linear graph. The green method effectively used for analysis of ABR in pharmaceutical tablets and pharmacokinetic study with high sensitivity.

Plant-based zinc nanoflowers assisted molecularly imprinted polymer for the design of an electrochemical sensor for selective determination of abrocitinib.

The first electrochemical sensor application in the literature is described for the sensitive and selective determination of the selective Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor abrocitinib (ABR). ABR is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. The molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based sensor was designed to incorporate zinc nanoflower (ZnNFs)-graphene oxide (GO) conjugate (ZnNFs@GO), synthesized from the root methanolic extract (RME) of the species Alkanna cappadocica Boiss. et Bal. to improve the porosity and effective surface area of the glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Furthermore, the MIP structure was prepared using ABR as a template molecule, 4-aminobenzoic acid (4-ABA) as a functional monomer, and other additional components. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to characterize the surface and structure of the synthesized nanomaterial and MIP-based surface. Among the electrochemical methods, cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were preferred for detailed electrochemical characterization, and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) was preferred for all other electrochemical measurements using 5.0 mM [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- solution as the redox probe. The MIP-based sensor, which was the result of a detailed optimization phase, gave a linear response in the 1.0 × 10-13 - 1.0 × 10-12 M range in standard solution and serum sample. The obtained limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values and recovery studies demonstrated the sensitivity, accuracy, and applicability of the sensor. Selectivity, the most important feature of the MIP-based sensor, was verified by imprinting factor calculations using ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, zonisamide, and acetazolamide.

Systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition with multiple systemic treatments and uncertainty regarding their comparative impact on AD outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD systemic treatments. METHODS: For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and GREAT databases from inception to November 29, 2022, for randomized trials addressing systemic treatments and phototherapy for AD. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/e5sna). RESULTS: The 149 included trials (28,686 patients with moderate-to-severe AD) evaluated 75 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, high-dose upadacitinib was among the most effective for 5 of 6 patient-important outcomes; high-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib were among the most effective for 2 outcomes. These Janus kinase inhibitors were among the most harmful in increasing adverse events. With high-certainty evidence, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab were of intermediate effectiveness and among the safest, modestly increasing conjunctivitis. Low-dose baricitinib was among the least effective. Efficacy and safety of azathioprine, oral corticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, phototherapy, and many novel agents are less certain. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with moderate-to-severe AD, high-certainty evidence demonstrates that high-dose upadacitinib is among the most effective in addressing multiple patient-important outcomes, but also is among the most harmful. High-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib are effective, but also among the most harmful. Dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab are of intermediate effectiveness and have favorable safety.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the risk of Herpes zoster with biological therapies and selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitors in atopic dermatitis.

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients have an increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). The relationship of dupilumab, tralokinumab, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib to HZ incidence in AD patients remains unclear. Aim: To evaluate and compare the incidence and risk of HZ among patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis treated with advanced systemic therapies. Material and methods: Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid Medline and Embase. The primary outcome was incidence of HZ in patients with moderate to severe AD receiving placebo or the aforementioned treatments. A frequentist random-effects NMA was conducted with odds ratio. Results: Our search identified 16 trials comprising 10,689 patients. Upadacitinib was associated with a dose-dependent increase in the incidence of HZ compared to placebo (OR = 2.55 [1.09, 5.95] and (OR = 4.29 [1.89, 9.74], respectively) and compared to various dupilumab doses (OR = 4.48 [1.29, 15.57], 3.61 [1.28, 10.18] and 7.54 [2.21, 25.68], 6.09 [2.24, 16.52], respectively). Upadacitinib 30 mg was associated with a higher incidence of HZ when compared to upadacitinib 15 mg (OR = 1.68 [1.19, 2.38]). Abrocitinib 200 mg was associated with a higher increase in HZ compared to placebo (OR = 3.34 [1.34, 8.31]). According to SUCRA ranks, both JAK-1 inhibitors had a higher cumulative incidence of HZ compared to dupilumab. Conclusions: JAK-1 inhibitors are associated with a significantly higher incidence of HZ compared to dupilumab and placebo. Our results suggest that recombinant HZ vaccination should be highly considered for all adult patients prior to starting oral JAK-1 inhibitors.

Deucravacitinib is an allosteric TYK2 protein kinase inhibitor FDA-approved for the treatment of psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a heterogeneous, inflammatory, autoimmune skin disease that affects up to 2% of the world's population. There are many treatment modalities including topical medicines, ultraviolet light therapy, monoclonal antibodies, and several oral medications. Cytokines play a central role in the pathogenesis of this disorder including TNF-α, (tumor necrosis factor-α) IL-17A (interleukin-17A), IL-17F, IL-22, and IL-23. Cytokine signaling involves transduction mediated by the JAK-STAT pathway. There are four JAKS (JAK1/2/3 and TYK2) and six STATS (signal transducer and activators of transcription). Janus kinases contain an inactive JH2 domain that is aminoterminal to the active JH1 domain. Under basal conditions, the JH2 domain inhibits the activity of the JH1 domain. Deucravacitinib is an orally effective N-trideuteromethyl-pyridazine derivative that targets and stabilizes the TYK2 JH2 domain and thereby blocks TYK2 JH1 activity. Seven other JAK inhibitors, which target the JAK family JH1 domain, are prescribed for the treatment of neoplastic and other inflammatory diseases. The use of deuterium in the trimethylamide decreases the rate of demethylation and slows the production of a metabolite that is active against a variety of targets in addition to TYK2. A second unique aspect in the development of deucravacitinib is the targeting of a pseudokinase domain. Deucravacitinib is rather specific for TYK2 and its toxic effects are much less than those of the other FDA-approved JAK inhibitors. The successful development of deucravacitinib may stimulate the development of additional pseudokinase ligands for the JAK family and for other kinase families as well.

Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors: A 2023 update.

Owing to the dysregulation of protein kinase activity in many diseases including cancer, this enzyme family has become one of the most important drug targets in the 21st century. There are 72 FDA-approved therapeutic agents that target about two dozen different protein kinases and three of these drugs were approved in 2022. Of the approved drugs, twelve target protein-serine/threonine protein kinases, four are directed against dual specificity protein kinases (MEK1/2), sixteen block nonreceptor protein-tyrosine kinases, and 40 target receptor protein-tyrosine kinases. The data indicate that 62 of these drugs are prescribed for the treatment of neoplasms (57 against solid tumors including breast, lung, and colon, ten against nonsolid tumors such as leukemia, and four against both solid and nonsolid tumors: acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, imatinib, and midostaurin). Four drugs (abrocitinib, baricitinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib) are used for the treatment of inflammatory diseases (atopic dermatitis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn disease, and ulcerative colitis). Of the 72 approved drugs, eighteen are used in the treatment of multiple diseases. The following three drugs received FDA approval in 2022 for the treatment of these specified diseases: abrocitinib (atopic dermatitis), futibatinib (cholangiocarcinomas), pacritinib (myelofibrosis). All of the FDA-approved drugs are orally effective with the exception of netarsudil, temsirolimus, and trilaciclib. This review summarizes the physicochemical properties of all 72 FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors including lipophilic efficiency and ligand efficiency.

Abrocitinib: A New FDA-Approved Drug for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to review abrocitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). DATA SOURCES: A literature search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was performed for articles from inception through end-March 2022 using the following search terms: atopic dermatitis, abrocitinib, PF-04965842, methotrexate, cyclosporine, dupilumab, ruxolitinib, and JAK-STAT pathway. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English articles relating to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of abrocitinib, and other conventional systemic medications for AD, were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Across phase IIb and phase III clinical trials, abrocitinib was efficacious with an average of 47.5% patients on 200 mg abrocitinib and 32.0% on 100 mg abrocitinib achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 at 12 weeks. In comparison with dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneously every other week, patients on abrocitinib 200 mg once daily had improved disease severity and itch response. The majority of adverse events were not severe and self-limited. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Prior to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of abrocitinib, prednisone was the only FDA-approved oral medication for AD. Although biologics such as dupilumab have revolutionized care, some patients prefer oral medications. Compared with clinical trials of conventional AD treatments, abrocitinib appears more effective. CONCLUSIONS: Abrocitinib is an efficacious oral JAK 1 inhibitor recently FDA-approved for patients ≥ 18 years old with moderate-to-severe AD who have not responded to systemic medications or when contraindicated otherwise.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis: New Perspectives. / Inhibidores de JAK en dermatitis atópica, nuevas perspectivas.

The JAK/STAT (Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription) pathway is an essential final step in the signaling process of most interleukins with a critical role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. By achieving broad, intermittent inhibition of the activity of multiple cytokines, JAK inhibitors help modulate T helper 2 cell-mediated inflammation, epidermal barrier dysfunction, and itch signaling. This comprehensive blockade, however, can result in a wider range of adverse effects. We review a number of JAK inhibitors that have been recently approved for use in atopic dermatitis, such as baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib, as well as others that are currently in the pipeline or under development, such as gusacitinib, delgocitinib, ruxolitinib, brepocitinib, tofacitinib, and cerdulatinib. The use of JAK inhibitors to block the signaling of numerous cytokines with a critical role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis has revolutionized the treatment of this pathogenically complex, phenotypically heterogeneous skin disease.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of neoplastic and inflammatory disorders.

The Janus kinase (JAK) family of nonreceptor protein-tyrosine kinases consists of JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2 (Tyrosine Kinase 2). Each of these proteins contains a JAK homology pseudokinase (JH2) domain that interacts with and regulates the activity of the adjacent protein kinase domain (JH1). The Janus kinase family is regulated by numerous cytokines including interferons, interleukins, and hormones such as erythropoietin and thrombopoietin. Ligand binding to cytokine receptors leads to the activation of associated Janus kinases, which then catalyze the phosphorylation of the receptors. The SH2 domain of signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) binds to the cytokine receptor phosphotyrosines thereby promoting STAT phosphorylation and activation by the Janus kinases. STAT dimers are then translocated into the nucleus where they participate in the regulation and expression of dozens of proteins. JAK1/3 signaling participates in the pathogenesis of inflammatory disorders while JAK1/2 signaling contributes to the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms as well as several malignancies including leukemias and lymphomas. An activating JAK2 V617F mutation occurs in 95% of people with polycythemia vera and about 50% of cases of myelofibrosis and essential thrombocythemia. Abrocitinib, ruxolitinib, and upadacitinib are JAK inhibitors that are FDA-approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Baricitinib is used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and covid 19. Tofacitinib and upadacitinib are JAK antagonists that are used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Additionally, ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of polycythemia vera while fedratinib, pacritinib, and ruxolitinib are approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis.

Phase 3 efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis after switching from dupilumab (JADE EXTEND).

BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib efficacy by prior dupilumab response status in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis has not previously been assessed in phase 3 studies. OBJECTIVE: Examine efficacy and safety of abrocitinib among patients who received prior dupilumab. METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis received abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg once daily in JADE EXTEND (phase 3 extension) after dupilumab in double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 JADE COMPARE. RESULTS: Among prior dupilumab responders, ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index was achieved in 93.5% and 90.2% of patients who received 12 weeks of abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively; ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale was achieved in 89.7% and 81.6%, respectively. Among prior dupilumab nonresponders, ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index was achieved with abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg in 80.0% and 67.7% and ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale in 77.3% and 37.8%, respectively. Most common adverse events among abrocitinib-treated patients were nasopharyngitis, nausea, acne, and headache. Conjunctivitis occurred less frequently with abrocitinib in comparison to prior dupilumab. LIMITATIONS: Short-term, 12-week analysis; no placebo arm. CONCLUSION: Efficacy and safety profile of abrocitinib in JADE EXTEND supports the role of abrocitinib as a treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, regardless of prior dupilumab response status.

Abrocitinib induction, randomized withdrawal, and retreatment in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from the JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety (JADE) REGIMEN phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The heterogeneous course of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis necessitates treatment flexibility. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the maintenance of abrocitinib-induced response with continuous abrocitinib treatment, dose reduction or withdrawal, and response to treatment reintroduction following flare (JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety [JADE] REGIMEN: National Clinical Trial 03627767). METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis responding to open-label abrocitinib 200 mg monotherapy for 12 weeks were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to blinded abrocitinib (200 or 100 mg) or placebo for 40 weeks. Patients experiencing flare received rescue treatment (abrocitinib 200 mg plus topical therapy). RESULTS: Of 1233 patients, 798 responders to induction (64.7%) were randomly assigned. The flare probability during maintenance was 18.9%, 42.6%, and 80.9% with abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Among patients with flare in the abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, and placebo groups, 36.6%, 58.8%, and 81.6% regained investigator global assessment 0/1 response, respectively, and 55.0%, 74.5%, and 91.8% regained eczema area and severity index response, respectively, with rescue treatment. During maintenance, 63.2% and 54.0% of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 and 100 mg, respectively, experienced adverse events. LIMITATIONS: The definition of protocol-defined flare was not established, limiting the generalizability of findings. CONCLUSION: Induction treatment with abrocitinib was effective; most responders continuing abrocitinib did not flare. Rescue treatment with abrocitinib plus topical therapy effectively recaptured response.

Comparative efficacy and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A network meta-analysis.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have become promising treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD), however no study directly comparing JAK inhibitors with each other has been reported. We conducted this network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of three common oral JAK inhibitors including abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe AD. We first identified eligible studies from published meta-analyzes, then we searched PubMed to obtain additional studies published between February and July 2021. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated as primary and secondary outcome, respectively. After extracting data and assessing methodological quality, we utilized ADDIS 1.4 software to conduct pair-wise and network meta-analyzes. Ten eligible studies were included in the final analysis. Pooled results that abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib obtained higher investigator global assessment (IGA), eczema area, and severity index (EASI) response, however abrocitinib and upadacitinib caused more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) regardless of doses, compared with placebo. Network meta-analyzes revealed that upadacitinib 30 mg was superior to all regimens and upadacitinib 15 mg was better than remaining regimens except for abrocitinib 200 mg in terms of IGA and EASI response. Moreover, abrocitinib 200 mg was superior to abrocitinib 100 mg, baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg for clinical efficacy. However, upadacitinib 30 mg caused more TEAEs. Abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib were consistently effective therapies in adult and adolescent patients with AD; however, upadacitinib 30 mg may be the optimal option in short-term studies. More efforts should be done to reduce the risk of TEAEs caused by upadacitinib 30 mg.

Janus Kinase and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Dermatology: A Review of Their Utilization, Safety Profile and Future Applications.

Janus kinase inhibitors, also commonly referred to as JAK inhibitors, are a novel drug class that target and block cytokine signaling mediated by the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway, thereby regulating immune response and cell growth. Although JAK inhibitors are mainly used for rheumatological conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, their application in the field of dermatology is actively being investigated. Tofacitinib is US FDA-approved for psoriatic arthritis and showing promise for treating psoriasis. Most recently, regulatory approvals for the US were gained by ruxolitinib as a first-inclass, selective, topical therapy for atopic dermatitis and oral upadacitinib for active psoriatic psoriasis. Additionally, abrocitinib and upadacitinib have demonstrated efficacy in atopic dermatitis and are pending FDA approval for this indication. The therapeutic potential of JAK inhibitors in dermatological conditions such as alopecia areata, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, and dermatomyositis are showing promising results in clinical trials. Adverse events for JAK inhibitors seem to be similar to that of biologic drugs. Common adverse effects include increased risk of infections and thromboembolic events. Further investigation is needed to not only better understand the safety profile of JAK inhibitors, but also their full utility within the field of dermatology.

Efficacy of abrocitinib for atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: The efficacy of abrocitinib for atopic dermatitis remains controversial. Aim: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of abrocitinib versus placebo on the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Material and methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of abrocitinib versus placebo for patients with atopic dermatitis. This meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model. Results: Four RCTs involving 932 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with the control group for atopic dermatitis, abrocitinib has a remarkably positive impact on IGA response (OR = 6.60; 95% CI: 4.41-9.87; p < 0.00001), EASI-75 (OR = 9.19; 95% CI: 6.20-13.61; p < 0.00001), EASI-90 (OR = 10.50; 95% CI: 5.54-19.93; p < 0.0001), NRS response (OR = 6.99; 95% CI: 4.43-11.01; p < 0.00001) and adverse events (OR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.23-2.52; p = 0.002), but showed no obvious influence on serious adverse events (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.20-1.44; p = 0.22). Conclusions: Abrocitinib exerts a favorable effect on the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

Abrocitinib 100 mg versus 200 mg for atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: It is elusive to compare the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib 100 mg versus 200 mg once daily in patients with atopic dermatitis. Aim: This meta-analysis aims to explore the influence of abrocitinib 100 mg versus 200 mg on the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Material and methods: Several databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library were systematically searched through July 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of abrocitinib 100 mg versus 200 mg for patients with atopic dermatitis. Results: Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with abrocitinib 100 mg for atopic dermatitis, abrocitinib 200 mg had a remarkably positive impact on IGA response (OR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.39-2.28; p < 0.00001), EASI-75 (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.60-2.57; p < 0.00001), NRS response (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.27-3.08; p = 0.003), and adverse events (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.11-1.84; p = 0.005), but it showed no obvious influence on serious adverse events (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.25-1.37; p = 0.22). Conclusions: Abrocitinib 200 mg is better than abrocitinib 100 mg for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.