Impact of Refractive Status on Presbyopia Progression among Patients with Presbyopia.

PURPOSE: To explore the impact of refractive status on presbyopia progression among patients with presbyopia. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients with presbyopia who visited the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Shenzhen Polytechnic Medical College between May 2018 and August 2022. The amplitude of accommodation (AMP) and near addition power (ADD) at 6 months and 1 year were collected. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients with presbyopia were included in this study: 42 patients with myopia, 23 patients with emmetropia, and 38 patients with hyperopia. There were significant differences in ΔAMP(6-month) and ΔADD(6-month) among patients with different refractive statuses, and the values of emmetropic patients and hyperopic patients were higher than in myopic patients (all P < 0.001). The ΔAMP(1-year) and ΔADD(1-year) of hyperopic patients were significantly higher than in emmetropic patients and myopic patients (all P < 0.001). The ΔADD(1-year) of emmetropic patients was greater than in myopic patients (P = 0.045), but there were no significant differences in ΔAMP(1-year) between patients with emmetropia and myopia (P = 0.090). CONCLUSIONS: The progression of presbyopia in hyperopic patients was relatively more significant than for emmetropia, followed by myopia. The prescription of presbyopia glasses might need to be replaced more frequently in patients with hyperopia.

Age and the amplitude of accommodation measured using dynamic retinoscopy.

PURPOSE: Dynamic retinoscopy (DR) is a procedure for assessing the accommodative response using a standard clinical instrument. The present study compared measurements of the amplitude of accommodation (AA) obtained using this technique with two subjective methods (modified push-down and minus lens). Additionally, the expected ranges for AA when measured by DR were determined. METHOD: AA was measured in 1298 subjects between 5 and 60 years of age using the three techniques described above. Subjects were grouped into 5-year bins, and a descriptive univariate analysis of the data performed. Goodness-of fit plots were constructed to examine the overall model fit. Centile curves were calculated from the final model. RESULTS: Mean values of AA obtained using DR were significantly lower than for the two subjective techniques. For the DR findings, no significant change was observed between 5 and 19 years of age (mean AA = 8.3 D) and between 45 and 60 years of age (mean AA = 0.6 D). AA values as a function of age were best fit by the polynomial regression equation: logAA = 1.93 + 0.49(age) - 0.19(age)(2) . CONCLUSION: Measurements of AA determined using DR are significantly lower than the normative subjective findings published previously. This difference is at least partly due to the depth-of-field of the eye. These norms markedly overestimate accommodative responsivity. DR provides a simple technique for quantifying accommodation in the clinical setting.

Refractive Errors, Amplitude of Accommodation, and Myopia Progression in Kazakhstani Medical Students: 5-Year Follow-Up.

Background/Objectives: this longitudinal study aimed to investigate the refractive errors, the amplitude of accommodation, and myopia progression in Kazakhstani medical students as they progressed from the first to the fifth course of their studies. Methods: A total of 696 students from Semey Medical University underwent non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in the first course, and 655 were available for examination in the fifth year of study. The amplitude of accommodation was measured before the instillation of cycloplegics using the push-up and push-down methods. A self-administered questionnaire was applied to evaluate the risk factors associated with myopia progression. Results: In the first course, the median spherical equivalent was -0.75 Diopters before cycloplegia and -0.25 Diopters after cycloplegia. In the fifth course, it constituted -1.125 Diopters before cycloplegia and -0.5 Diopters after cycloplegia. The proportion of students with myopia following cycloplegic refraction increased from 44.7% in the first course to 47.5% in the fifth course. The proportion of emmetropic students declined from 31.5% to 30.3%, and hyperopia decreased from 23.8% to 16.8%. The dioptric power of accommodative excess increased from 0.375 in the first year to 0.50 in the fifth year. The hours spent on near-work activities, such as reading books, writing, working at a computer, and using a mobile device, were significantly associated with a myopia progression of ≥0.5 Diopters. Conclusions: the findings of this study suggest implications for public health policy and educational practice.

BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: Mechanism and optics.

With over a billion adults worldwide currently affected, presbyopia remains a ubiquitous, global problem. Despite over a century of study, the precise mechanism of ocular accommodation and presbyopia progression remains a topic of debate. Accordingly, this narrative review outlines the lenticular and extralenticular components of accommodation together with the impact of age on the accommodative apparatus, neural control of accommodation, models of accommodation, the impact of presbyopia on retinal image quality, and both historic and contemporary theories of presbyopia.

Understanding Presbyopia in Asmara: Prevalence, Association with Refractive Error, and Age-Based Addition.

Background: Presbyopia is an age-related progressive decrease of near vision, corrected by near addition glasses. These age-appropriate glasses, however, vary across different geographical locations and populations. But there is no existing information on the age-based addition for Asmara and high number of uncorrected presbyopes, so this study determined the required age-based addition for the presbyopes in Asmara. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients aged 35-60 years who visited all eye centers in the city. Patients with best-corrected visual acuity in both eyes better than 6/9 were included in the study. Near add was calculated using Monocular Estimation Method (MEM) and amplitude of accommodation results. Data entry and analysis were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v. 20. Results: This study included 1310 participants of whom 48.5% were females and 51.5% were males. The prevalence of presbyopia was found to be 74.1% out of which 44% were females. There were 35.6% of the participants with a previous prescription for glasses, though only 24% of the participants presented with glasses on. Among the different occupational categories, laborers were the ones who had the highest number of presbyopes (79.5%), office workers (73%), and housewives (68.7%). The mean age of those with presbyopes was 49.5 ± 5.8 years. Multivariable analysis performed for presbyopia showed that older age and female sex were associated with a higher likelihood of presbyopia (<0.005). An addition table was prepared separately for males and females. On post-hoc tests, no significant association was found between the given and the different refractive status. Conclusion: The study showed that there is a high level of uncorrected presbyopes in the city, so the availability of refraction sites and glasses accessibility needs to increase. The near addition demand for this population varies from the previously stated amount in other countries. Therefore, guidelines specifically prepared for a society are necessary.

Evidence of the Amplitude of Accommodation of School-Going Children in the 21st Century.

Purpose: The study sought to compare the normative amplitude of accommodation (AoA) in school-going children from studies in the 21st century, based on pooled estimates from meta-analyses, to assess their agreement to Hofstetter's average formula. Methods: A PRISMA checklist was used to conduct the review. PubMed, EBSCOHOST and Medline electronic databases were employed, and hand searching resulting in 259 studies up to July 2021. After title and abstract screening, 12 studies underwent full-text screening, resulting in five studies for data extraction. The pooled effect size was determined using meta-analyses for sub-groups by age. A one-sample t-test was used to compare the pool-effect size estimates (monocular) to the expected AoA from Hofstetter's average formula. Results: The comparison of pool estimates of AoA with the expected Hofstetter's average formula for the age sub-groups showed significant mean differences for: six-year olds: mean difference of -3.4 D (95% CI: -5.85; -1.04; p = 0.025); nine-year olds: mean difference of -4.1D (95% CI: -7.95; -0.20; p = 0.043); ten-year olds: mean difference of -4.6D (95% CI: -8.57; -0.54; p = 0.035) and 11-year olds: mean difference of -5.2 D (95% CI: -8.06; -2.40; p = 0.005). According to the quality assessment tool used, overall, the body of evidence was of good quality. Conclusion: Hofstetter's prediction of normative amplitude of accommodation today may over-estimate for children aged six, nine, 10 and 11. The observed under-accommodation estimates from these comparisons may warrant consideration in assessing for a larger lag of accommodation in these age groups with myopia or pre-myopia, as part of the surveillance for progression.

Transient effects of smoking on the eye.

PURPOSE: To investigate the immediate short-term effects of smoking in habitual smokers, on the tear film, pupil size and accommodative ability of the human eye. METHODS: Habitual smokers were tested within 5 min of smoking a cigarette. The tear film analysis was undertaken using tear break-up time (TBUT), tear lipid layer thickness and tears meniscus height (TMH) measurements. Three different ways of tear break-up time (TBUT) were used; using fluorescein; a non-invasive TBUT using tearscope; and a video captured method with a corneal topographer. Pupil size was measured objectively using the video capture on the corneal topographer. Accommodative ability was checked by performing a 'push up test' to measure amplitudes of accommodation (AoA) and by measuring defocus curves. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were enrolled (mean age 22.0 ± 4.4 years). TBUT was reduced after smoking a cigarette with all three assessment methods and this reduction was statistically significant (p < 0.001). A reduction in lipid layer thickness was seen after smoking a cigarette with both methods used and was statistically significant (p < 0.01). A significant reduction in pupil size (p < 0.01) and in AoA (p < 0.001) was observed after smoking a cigarette. The difference in TMH and defocus curves, before and after smoking, were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study shows that there is an immediate adverse effect of smoking on TBUT and AoA which seems to be very transient.

Accommodative insufficiency in post-COVID-19 case with refractive error.

The aim of the case report is to present refractive error with accommodative insufficiency as a possible postinfectious manifestation of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Three weeks after the COVID-19 infection, a 22-year-old subject presented with blurring of distance and near vision with a frontal headache after prolonged near work. The patient was not using any refractive correction before the COVID-19 infection. This case report describes the diagnosis, management, and treatment of accommodative dysfunction in a patient with a history of COVID-19 infection.

Comparison of the Amplitude of Accommodation Measured Using a New-Generation Closed-Field Autorefractor with Conventional Subjective Methods.

Purpose: This study aims to compare and assess the agreement of the objective amplitude of accommodation (AA) measured using a new-generation closed-field autorefractor with conventional subjective methods. Methods: In total, 84 healthy individuals with an age range of 19 to 50 years participated in this cross-sectional study. AA was measured objectively with a Nidek autorefractor (AR-1a; Nidek Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and subjectively using push-up (PU) and minus-lens (ML) methods in a random order. Comparison between different methods was performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test for pairwise comparisons. In addition to the Pearson correlation, the Bland and Altman method and the intraclass correlation coefficient were used to determine the agreement between the three techniques. Only the right-eye results were used for analysis. Results: AA measured using the Nidek autorefractor (3.43 ± 1.94 D) was significantly lower than that measured with PU (7.67 ± 2.38 D; p < 0.001) and ML (7.60 ± 2.81 D; p < 0.001) methods. The difference between the subjective methods was not significant statistically (p = 1.0). The correlation for Nidek measurements and PU and ML methods was moderate (r = 0.5502 and r = 0.6832, respectively), while it was strong when comparing subjective methods (r = 0.7821). The limits of agreement for Nidek vs. PU, Nidek vs. ML, and PU vs. ML methods were −8.28 to −0.23 D, −8.19 to −0.15 D, and −3.38 to 3.51 D, respectively. Conclusions: There was a moderate agreement between AA obtained with subjective methods and objective Nidek measurements. The objective AA measurements obtained with a new Nidek autorefractor were significantly lower than subjective measurements.

The Impact of Clinical Atropine Use in Taiwanese Schoolchildren: Changes in Physiological Characteristics and Visual Functions.

Taiwan is commonly noted for its high prevalence of myopia, as well as a long history of more than 20 years of using atropine to control myopia. However, the clinical implications are rarely discussed. This is a cross-sectional study investigating the influence of topical atropine instillation on ocular physiology, visual function, and visual discomfort in children. Aged 7 to 12 years, 212 schoolchildren were recruited and divided into the atropine group and the non-atropine group. Physiological characteristics such as pupil size and intraocular pressure were measured, and a variety of visual functions was also evaluated. A questionnaire was used to investigate the side effects and visual complaints caused by atropine treatment. There was a significant difference in pupil size (OD: 5.40 ± 0.90 vs. 6.60 ± 1.01 mm; OS: 5.42 ± 0.87 vs. 6.64 ± 1.00 mm, p < 0.001) between the two groups. Reductions in near visual acuity, accommodation, convergence ability, and stereopsis were observed in the atropine group. The horizontal pupil diameter enlarged, and visual functions were greatly affected after administration of topical atropine. The changes in visual function during atropine therapy need to be carefully monitored by clinicians, while patient compliance is usually the key to success.

Disparity vergence differences between typically occurring and concussion-related convergence insufficiency pediatric patients.

This study sought to test the hypothesis that significant differences would be observed in clinical measures, symptoms, and objective assessments of vergence eye movements between children with typically developing convergence insufficiency (TYP-CI) and children with persistent post-concussion symptoms with convergence insufficiency (PPCS-CI). Data from age-matched binocularly normal controls (BNC) were used for comparison. Data from three groups of children 11 to 17 years of age are presented: BNC (N = 11), TYP-CI (N = 10), and PPCS-CI (N = 15). Clinical measures of vergence, accommodation, and symptom severity were collected. Symmetrical 4° disparity vergence eye movements were quantified with an eye tracker integrated into a head-mounted display (Oculus DK2). Peak velocity and final response amplitude of convergence and divergence eye movement responses were assessed. The mean near point of convergence (break) was more receded (worse), the amplitude of accommodation more deficient, and convergent and divergent peak velocities slower in the PPCS-CI group compared with the TYP-CI and BNC groups. These results suggest that PPCS-CI may be a different clinical entity than TYP-CI. Hence, more research is warranted to determine whether the therapeutic interventions that are effective for TYP-CI can also be used for PPCS-CI populations.

Comparative Study of Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation in Treating Four Degrees of Myopia: Six-Month Observation of Visual Results, Higher-Order Aberrations, and Amplitude of Accommodation.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and amplitude of accommodation (AA) after implantable collamer lens (ICL) model V4c implantation in four degrees of myopia. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven myopic eyes (137 patients) undergoing ICL implantation were included and divided into four groups: Group 1 with spherical equivalent (SE) ≤-6.0D, Group 2 with SE from -6.13D to -9.0D, Group 3 with SE from -9.13D to -12.0D, and Group 4 with SE from -12.13D to -18.0D. The postoperative visits were scheduled at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Visual and refractive outcomes, HOAs and AA were observed and compared. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in Group 4 was worse than the values in the other groups (all p < .05). Meanwhile, Group 4 had more eyes with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improvement than the other groups. Furthermore, 96%, 100%, 100%, and 81% of eyes had an SE within ±0.5D in Group 1, Group 2, Group 3, and Group 4 (p < .05 between Group 4 and the other groups), respectively. The postoperative UDVA and SE remained stable in all groups. No significant change in total HOAs was found between preoperative and postoperative values for each group. However, quatrefoil increased in each group, whereas trefoil was induced in all groups except for Group 1. Negative spherical aberration was induced in Group 3 and Group 4. AA significantly decreased 1 week postoperatively and gradually improved in each group. Although AA improved to the preoperative level in Group 1 at 3 months postoperatively, it was still lower than the preoperative level in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: In treating different degrees of myopia with ICL implantation, differences were observed in terms of CDVA improvement, SE predictability, HOAs induction, and accommodation recovery.

Accommodative anomalies in children.

Asthenopic and related symptoms are a major problem in school-going children. With the inception of computers and other gadgets for near work, the unseen problems arising out of constant and continuous near work, are on the rise. Parents wander from pillar to post, seeking respite from their child's constant complaints from near work; but despite best spectacle correction and avoidance of excessive near work, the complaints continue. Studies have shown that the majority of these problems arise from defects in accommodation, even in a young child. Therefore, various aspects of accommodation deficiencies have to be studied clinically, detected, and treated to ameliorate the symptoms.

Sources of error in clinical measurement of the amplitude of accommodation.

Measurement of the amplitude of accommodation is established as a procedure in a routine optometric eye examination. However, clinical methods of measurement of this basic optical function have several sources of error. They are numerous and diverse, and include depth of focus, reaction time, instrument design, specification of the measurement end-point, specification of the reference point of measurement, measurement conditions, consideration of refractive error, and psychological factors. Several of these sources of inaccuracy are composed of multiple sub-sources, and many of the sub-sources influence the common methods of measurement of amplitude of accommodation. Consideration of these sources of measurement error casts doubt on the reliability of the results of measurement, on the validity of established normative values that have been produced using these methods, and on the value of reports of the results of surgery designed to restore accommodation. Clinicians can reduce the effects of some of the sources of error by modifying techniques of measurement with existing methods, but a new method may further improve accuracy.

Accommodative Insufficiency: Prevalence, Impact and Treatment Options.

PURPOSE: Accommodative insufficiency (AI), defined as the inability to stimulate accommodation in pre-presbyopic individuals, has gained much attention over recent years. Despite the enormity of the available information, there is a significant lack of clarity regarding the criteria for definition, methodology adopted for testing and diagnosis, and the varied prevalence across the globe. This review aims to gather evidence that is pertinent to the prevalence, impact and efficacy of available treatment options for AI. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Collaboration search engines were used with the keywords prevalence, accommodative insufficiency, symptoms, plus lens, vision therapy and treatment. Peer-reviewed articles published between 1992 and 2019 were included in the review. After reviewing the studies for study methodology and robustness, 83 articles were chosen for this literature review. RESULTS: The prevalence of AI ranges between <1.00% and 61.6% across studies. The prevalence shows considerable variation across ethnicities and age groups. There is significant variation in the study methodology, diagnostic criteria and number of tests performed to arrive at the diagnosis. Not many studies have explored the prevalence beyond 20 years of age. The prevalence of AI is high among children with special needs. There is no high-quality evidence regarding the standard treatment protocol for AI. Both vision therapy and low plus lenses have shown efficacy in independent studies, and no studies have compared these two treatment options. CONCLUSION: The understanding of AI prevalence is currently limited owing to the lack of a standard set of diagnostic criteria and wide variations in the study methodology. There is a lack of high-quality evidence suggesting the best possible treatment for AI. The current gaps in the literature have been identified and future scope for exploration is elucidated.

The Influence of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Amplitude of Accommodation.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the amplitude of accommodation (AA) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) and without diabetic retinopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two age- and sex-matched groups - one with twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients with type 1 DM, the other with twenty-nine eyes of 29 healthy individuals - retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and macular volume were determined by using optic coherence tomography in all quadrants, whereas AA was measured with the minus lens technique. The mean values of all three measurements were compared between the groups, and the effect of age, disease duration, (HbA1c and fasting blood glucose on AA were analysed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: On average, participants were 25.0 ± 3.3 years old (range 19-30) in both groups (P = 1.000), and patients had type 1 DM for an average of 13.0 ± 3.3 years. Mean AA in the right eye was 7.3 ± 1.1 D among patients and 8.1 ± 1.1 D among controls (P = .005), as well as significantly negatively correlated with age in both groups (r = -0.735, P <.001 and r = -0.819, P < .001, respectively) and disease duration among patients (r = -0.434, P = .019). In multivariable regression, age and disease duration significantly affected AA in patients, with an R2 value of 0.623 (P < .001 and P = .025, respectively). Average RNFL thickness was significantly different between the groups (P = .014). Mean macular volumes for areas 1, 3 or 5 mm in diameter were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: AA was significantly lower among patients with type 1 DM than among healthy individuals, which suggests that the former might experience presbyopia earlier in life than the general population.

Difference in Pupillary Diameter as an Important Factor for Evaluating Amplitude of Accommodation: A Prospective Observational Study.

Presbyopia is increasing globally due to aging and the widespread use of visual display terminals. Presbyopia is a decrease in the eye's amplitude of accommodation (AA) due to loss of crystalline lens elasticity. AA differs widely among individuals. We aimed to determine the factors that cause presbyopia, other than advanced age, for early medical intervention. We examined 95 eyes of 95 healthy volunteers (33 men, 62 women) aged 22-62 years (mean: 37.22 ± 9.77 years) with a corrected visual acuity of ≥1.0 and without other eye afflictions except ametropia. Subjective refraction, AA, maximum and minimum pupillary diameters during accommodation, axial length of the eye, and crystalline lens thickness were measured. AA was measured using an auto refractometer/keratometer/tonometer/pachymeter. The difference between maximum and minimum pupillary diameters was calculated. On multiple regression analysis, age and difference in pupillary diameter were both significantly and independently associated with AA in participants aged <44 years, but not in those aged ≥45 years. Our results suggest that the difference in pupillary diameter could be an important age-independent factor for evaluating AA in healthy individuals without cataract. Thus, improving the difference in pupillary diameter values could be an early treatment target for presbyopia.

A systematic review about the impact of phakic intraocular lenses on accommodation.

Phakic intraocular lenses (pIOL) are the main treatment for patients who have either high ametropia or contraindications for laser refractive surgery. The main feature that makes this kind of lenses suitable for its implantation in young adults searching for independence of optical prescription is the conservation of accommodation, since lens extraction is not required. A systematic review has been performed to evaluate the scientific literature on the effect of pIOL implantation on accommodation. Critical assessment of the articles included in the review was achieved using the tool Critical Appraisal Skills Programme in its Spanish form (CASPe). After revising the complete text of 10 articles pre-selected, two quasi-experimental pre-post studies evaluating the outcomes of a specific model of posterior chamber pIOL were included in the systematic review. The CASPe scoring of both studies were 5/11. According to this outcome, the evidence describing the impact of the pIOL implantation on the accommodative function can be defined poor. Some trends are reported as the decrease in the amplitude of accommodation, a decrease positive relative accommodation and improvement of accommodation. However, these results should be confirmed in future controlled studies.

The role of clinical diagnosis criteria on the frequency of accommodative insufficiency.

AIM: To estimate and compare the frequency of accommodative insufficiency (AI) within the same clinical population sample depending on the type of clinical criteria used for diagnosis. Comparing the frequency within the same population would help to minimize bias due to sampling or methodological variability. METHODS: Retrospective study of 205 medical records of symptomatic subjects free of any organic cause and symptoms persisting despite optical compensation evaluated. Based on the most commonly clinical diagnostics criteria found in the literature, four diagnostics criteria were established for AI (I, II, III and IV) based on subjective accommodative tests: monocular accommodative amplitude two or more diopters below Hofstetter's minimum value [15-(0.25×age)] (I, II, III, IV); failing monocular accommodative facility with minus lens, establishing the cut-off in 0 cycles per minute (cpm) (I) and in 6 cpm (II, III); failing binocular accommodative facility with minus lens, establishing the cut-off in 0 cpm (I) and in 3 cpm (II). RESULTS: The proportion of AI (95%CI) for criteria I, II, III and IV were 1.95% (0.04%-3.86%), 2.93% (0.31%-4.57%), 6.34% (1.90%-7.85%) and 41.95% (35.14%-48.76%) respectively, with a statistically significant difference shown between these values (χ2 =226.7, P<0.001). A pairwise multiple comparison revealed that the proportion of AI detected for criterion IV was significantly greater than the proportion for the rest of the criteria (P-adjusted<0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of cases of AI within the same clinical population varies with the clinical diagnostic criteria selected. The variation is statistically significant when considering the monocular accommodative amplitude as the only clinical diagnostic sign.

Objective Accommodation Amplitude Measurements Using a New Autorefractometer Device.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the value of objective accommodation amplitude (AA) in patients using the new autorefractometer device and to evaluate the effects of age, refraction errors, pupil diameter on objective AA measurements. METHODS: Three hundred subjects who were divided into five groups according to age were enrolled in this study. AA and pupil diameter were measured three times from both eyes using Tonoref III (NIDEK Co., Ltd.). RESULTS: The mean AA was 1.6325±0.061 Diopter (D) (0.13-9.11 D). The mean AA values were statistically significantly different between the groups (p=0.000). It was not observed gender effect on AA (p=0.115). Although there was no significant difference between emmetropic and myopic groups, there were significant differences between emmetropic and hyperopic groups and also between myopic and hyperopic groups concerning AA (p=0.000, for both). A statistically significant difference was found for the mean AA between the groups with and without refractive surgery (p=0.028). Correlation analysis revealed that AA is increased as the mean pupil diameter increases (p=0.000, r=0.202) and the mean pupil diameter decreases with increasing age (p=0.000, r=-0.308). When the AA obtained from the patients in group 1 were compared with the AA values obtained by subjective accommodation tests, the AA values obtained by autorefractometer device were found to be correlated with push up, push down and minus lens tests (r=0.577, r=0.682, r=0.427) AA values obtained by autorefractometer device were found to be statistically significantly lower than other subjective tests (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The Tonoref III device seems to provide objective AA measurements in presbyopic or non-presbyopic individuals. Age, refractive error, pupil diameter and history of refractive surgery were effective on AA values, while the gender was not effective.