Improved characterization of aminoglycoside penetration into human lung epithelial lining fluid via population pharmacokinetics.

Aminoglycosides are important treatment options for serious lung infections, but modeling analyses to quantify their human lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF) penetration are lacking. We estimated the extent and rate of penetration for five aminoglycosides via population pharmacokinetics from eight published studies. The area under the curve in ELF vs plasma ranged from 50% to 100% and equilibration half-lives from 0.61 to 5.80 h, indicating extensive system hysteresis. Aminoglycoside ELF peak concentrations were blunted, but overall exposures were moderately high.

Arbekacin-Loaded Inhalable Nanocomposite Particles Specific to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Prepared Using a Two-Solution Mixing-Type Spray Nozzle.

Hospital-acquired pneumonia is an important infectious disease that requires special management and therapy for patients with compromised immunity, as opportunistic infections with microorganisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be fatal. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery to lung tissue provides several advantages in the treatment of respiratory diseases. In the current study, inhalable nanocomposite particles consisting of microparticles containing solid-state arbekacin (ABK) nanoparticles coated with hydrophobic surfactant (ABK-SD nanoparticles) were prepared using a spray dryer equipped with a two-solution mixing-type spray nozzle we previously developed. ABK-SD/mannitol (MAN) nanocomposite particles were obtained from ABK-SD nanoparticles by varying the amounts of hydrophobic surfactant and ABK. The aerosol performance of ABK-SD/MAN nanocomposite particles was superior to that of ABK-MAN microparticles in terms of the fine particle fraction (28.4 ± 5.4%, ABK-SD/MAN nanocomposite particles; 11.4 ± 7.6%, ABK-MAN microparticles). These results suggest that ABK-SD/MAN nanocomposite particles are suitable for use in inhalation drug formulations and useful for the treatment of lung infections involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

A study of trends and factors associated with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) implementation for arbekacin treatment using a large Japanese medical claims database.

INTRODUCTION: Reimbursements for pharmacist interventions and infectious disease teams have recently been introduced in Japan. Arbekacin (ABK) is used to treat pneumonia and sepsis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended. This study aimed to clarify the trend in TDM implementation for ABK over time and the factors associated with TDM implementation using a claims database. METHODS: Data of patients aged ≥15 years who received ABK for ≥3 consecutive days between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from a large Japanese medical claims database. The proportion of reimbursements claimed for TDM, pharmacist interventions, and the setup of infectious disease teams for each year were calculated. The factors associated with TDM implementation were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The proportion of TDM implementation for ABK increased by 9.1% from 2010 to 2019, but it remained less than 40% throughout this period. The proportion of TDM implementation was higher in patients who claimed reimbursements for pharmacist interventions than in patients who did not. Logistic regression analysis showed that the stationing of pharmacists in wards and long-term ABK treatment were significantly associated with TDM implementation. CONCLUSIONS: From 2010 to 2019, the proportion of TDM implementation for ABK was significantly low. Moreover, the factors associated with TDM implementation were clarified. An environment wherein pharmacists can help implement TDM for patients receiving ABK would be beneficial.

Evaluation of once-daily dosing and target concentrations in therapeutic drug monitoring for arbekacin: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Arbekacin is the first aminoglycoside antibacterial agent approved for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Japan. Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended during arbekacin treatment, little evidence for the target exposure and once-daily dosing has been reported. This study aimed to clarify the target peak/trough concentrations and the effectiveness of once-daily dosing of arbekacin against nephrotoxicity or treatment failure via meta-analysis. METHODS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web. RESULTS: Nine observational cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. A peak arbekacin concentration of ≥15-16 µg/mL did not exhibit a statistically significant lower risk of treatment failure (risk ratio [RR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30-1.24). A trough arbekacin concentration of <2 µg/mL resulted in a significantly lower risk of nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.15-0.61). Once-daily dosing significantly reduced the risk of treatment failure (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39-0.97) but not nephrotoxicity (RR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.16-1.75). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily dosing can improve the therapeutic efficacy of arbekacin, and a trough arbekacin concentration of <2 µg/mL can reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity. A peak arbekacin concentration of ≥15-16 µg/mL did not exhibit the significant lower risk of treatment failure. Additional clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses To Support Dose Selection for ME1100, an Arbekacin Inhalation Solution.

ME1100 (arbekacin inhalation solution) is an inhaled aminoglycoside that is being developed to treat patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP and VABP, respectively). Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) target attainment analyses were undertaken to evaluate ME1100 regimens for the treatment of patients with HABP/VABP. The data used included a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) 4-compartment model with 1st-order elimination, nonclinical PK-PD targets from one-compartment in vitro and/or in vivo infection models, and in vitro surveillance data. Using the PPK model, total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentration-time profiles were generated for simulated patients with varying creatinine clearance (CLcr) (ml/min/1.73 m2) values. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment by MIC were determined based on the ratio of total-drug ELF area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) targets associated with 1- and 2-log10 CFU reductions from baseline for Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on PK-PD targets for a 1-log10 CFU reduction from baseline at MIC values above the MIC90 value for K. pneumoniae (8 µg/ml), P. aeruginosa (4 µg/ml), and S. aureus (0.5 µg/ml) were ≥99.8% for ME1100 600 mg twice daily (BID) in simulated patients with CLcr values >80 to ≤120 ml/min/1.73 m2 ME1100 600 mg BID, 450 mg BID, and 600 mg once daily in simulated patients with CLcr values >50 to ≤80, >30 to ≤50, and 0 to ≤30 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively, provided arbekacin exposures that best matched those for 600 mg BID in simulated patients with normal renal function. These data provide support for ME1100 as a treatment for patients with HABP/VABP.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses for Arbekacin after Administration of ME1100 Inhalation Solution.

ME1100, an inhalation solution of arbekacin, an aminoglycoside, is being developed for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. The objective of these analyses was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to describe the arbekacin concentration-time profile in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) following ME1100 administration. Data were obtained from a postmarketing study for an intravenous (i.v.) formulation of arbekacin, a phase 1 study of ME1100 in healthy volunteers, and a phase 1b study of ME1100 in mechanically ventilated subjects with bacterial pneumonia. Data from the postmarketing study were utilized to develop a population pharmacokinetic model following i.v. administration, and this model was subsequently utilized as the foundation for development of the model characterizing arbekacin disposition following inhalation of ME1100. The final model utilized two compartments for both plasma and ELF disposition, with movement of arbekacin between the ELF and plasma parameterized using linear first-order rate constants. A bioavailability term was included for the inhalational route of administration, which was estimated to be 19.5% for a typical subject. The model included normalized creatinine clearance (CLcrn) and weight as covariates on arbekacin clearance: CL = (weight/52.2)0.855·[(CLcrn-77)·0.0289 + 2.32]. The model simultaneously described arbekacin concentrations following both i.v. and inhaled administration and provided acceptable fits to the plasma and ELF data (r2 of 0.922 and 0.557 for observed versus fitted concentrations, respectively). The developed model will be useful for conducting future analyses to support ME1100 dose selection.

Population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in different infectious disease settings and evaluation of dosing regimens.

The efficacy of arbekacin in patients with MRSA infections is influenced by the peak concentration (Cpeak)/MIC ratio (≧8). A daily arbekacin dose of 4-6 mg/kg is primarily used for the treatment of MRSA infection. However, clinical pharmacokinetic studies of arbekacin that evaluate changes in patients with different infectious diseases have been limited. This study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in different infectious diseases and to evaluate its dosing regimens. This work describes a single-centre, retrospective study. The pharmacokinetic parameters of arbekacin were calculated from individual serum-concentration data using WinNonlin ver. 6.3. A total of 331 serum samples were obtained from 170 patients. Our drug concentration-time data were well described by a two-compartment open model. The final model showed that drug clearance was related to creatinine clearance and that the total distribution volume (Vd) was related to actual body weight and the presence of bacteremia. The individual Vd in bacteremia patients was significantly higher than those of other patients (bacteremia: 29.7 ± 0.5 L, pneumonia: 20.8 ± 0.4 L, other infections: 21.4 ± 0.4 L; p < 0.05). Additionally, Monte Carlo simulation showed that target (Cpeak/MIC â‰§ 8) attainment was only 10.1%, even at a dose of 6 mg/kg, especially for MRSA bacteremia patients with an arbekacin MIC = 2 µg/mL. In conclusion, our study revealed that the Vd may be higher in bacteremia patients than in patients with other infectious diseases. Therefore, an increase in the daily dose of arbekacin should be considered for bacteremia patients.

Comparison of Arbekacin and Vancomycin in Treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media by Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of ear infections. We attempted to evaluate the clinical usefulness of arbekacin in treating chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) by comparing its clinical efficacy and toxicity with those of vancomycin. Efficacy was classified according to bacterial elimination or bacteriologic failure and improved or failed clinical efficacy response. Ninety-five subjects were diagnosed with CSOM caused by MRSA. Twenty of these subjects were treated with arbekacin, and 36 with vancomycin. The bacteriological efficacy (bacterial elimination, arbekacin vs. vancomycin: 85.0% vs. 97.2%) and improved clinical efficacy (arbekacin vs. vancomycin; 90.0% vs. 97.2%) were not different between the two groups. However, the rate of complications was higher in the vancomycin group (33.3%) than in the arbekacin group (5.0%) (P=0.020). In addition, a total of 12 adverse reactions were observed in the vancomycin group; two for hepatotoxicity, one for nephrotoxicity, eight for leukopenia, two for skin rash, and one for drug fever. It is suggested that arbekacin be a good alternative drug to vancomycin in treatment of CSOM caused by MRSA.

Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of arbekacin: a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Arbekacin (ABK) was approved and widely used in Japan for treatment of patients infected with MRSA, and TDM was introduced in clinical practice. The Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring decided to develop a clinical practice guidelines for TDM of ABK for the following reasons. First, although the daily dose of 150-200 mg was approved in Japan, recent PK-PD studies revealed that higher serum concentration is required to achieve better clinical efficacy and several findings concerning the usefulness of higher dosage regimen have obtained recently. Second, although maximal concentrations that obtained immediately after the end of administration (Cmax) was generally adopted, the serum concentration at 1 h after initiation of administration [peak serum concentration (Cpeak)] proved to be more suitable as an efficacy indicator of aminoglycosides. Lastly, as ABK is approved only in Japan, no international practice guideline for TDM has not been available in ABK to date. This guideline evaluated the scientific data associated with serum ABK monitoring and provided recommendations based on the available evidence. Potential limitations of this guideline, however, include the findings that few prospective clinical trials of TDM of ABK are available in the treatment of MRSA infections and that most of the published literature describes observational studies.

Pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in bronchial epithelial lining fluid of healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Arbekacin is a unique aminoglycoside antibiotic with anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity. The efficacy of aminoglycosides is related to their serum maximum concentration. Local concentration of antibiotics in pulmonary epithelial lining fluid, rather than its serum concentration, can help determine its clinical efficacy more precisely for treatment of respiratory infectious disease. The objective of this study was to sequentially measure arbekacin concentration in epithelial lining fluid after infusion of a single clinically available dose. METHOD: After the initial blood sampling, arbekacin was intravenously infused into 6 healthy volunteers over 1 h. Epithelial lining fluid and serum samples were collected by bronchoscopic microsampling 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h after the start of 200 mg arbekacin infusion. RESULTS: Each probe sampled 10.1 ± 5.2 µl bronchial epithelial lining fluid. The sample dilution factor was 266.7 ± 157.1. Drug concentration was successfully measured in all but 2 of the epithelial lining fluid samples. The maximum concentration of arbekacin in epithelial lining fluid and serum was 10.4 ± 1.9 µg/ml and 26.0 ± 12.2 µg/ml, respectively. The ratio of the maximum drug concentration in the epithelial lining fluid to that in the serum was 0.47 ± 0.19. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum concentration of epithelial lining fluid reached levels that would effectively treat most clinical strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Analysis of impurity profiling of arbekacin sulfate by ion-pair liquid chromatography coupled with pulsed electrochemical detection and online ion suppressor-ion trap-time off light mass spectrometry.

Ion-pair liquid chromatography with pulsed electrochemical detection (LC-PED) was established for the analysis of impurities in arbekacin (ABK) sulfate. APursuit pentafluorophenylpropyl (PFP) column was used as stationary phase. This novel method showed greater separation and sensitivity ability. In a representative ABK sample, 24 impurity peaks were detected in LC-PED, where of only 9 were monitored by a post-column derivatization method prescribed by the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP). For identification of the chemical structures of the impurities detected by LC-PED, LC-Mass Spectrometry (MS) was used. Two challenges had to be overcome in this work. The first was the transfer of the MS incompatible mobile phase to an MS compatibleone while maintaining the elution order of the peaks in the chromatograms. Previously reported approaches such as two-dimensional (2D)LC were hardly applicable in this case due to the lack of ultraviolet (UV) absorbing chromophores in ABK and its impurities. The sodium hydroxide solution was replaced by aqueous ammonia to adjust the pH of the mobile phase used in LC-PED. The other challenge encountered was the ion suppression effect caused by trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and pentafluoroproponic acid (PFPA) in the mobile phase. Some strategies such as "TFA-fixed" and its modifications were tried, but they were inconvenient and severe contamination of the MS was observed. A cationself-regenerating suppressor (CSRS), which was originally designed for increasing analyte conductivityof ammonia and amines analysis in ion chromatography (IC), was coupled between the LC and Ion Trap-Time of Flight (IT-TOF)-MS and almost all TFA and PFPA in the mobile phase were removed. The limit of detection (LOD) of ABK in this integrated system improved significantly to 20 ng/mL. The chemical structures of the 28 impurities were elucidated and 15 impurities were reported for the first time.

In vitro activity of arbekacin against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli.

BACKGROUND: Arbekacin is a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside with activity against some Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: Arbekacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined for 296 drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, and compared to previously determined plazomicin, amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin MIC values. RESULTS: The MIC values required to inhibit 50% and 90% of isolates (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively) were 16 and >128 µg/ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Arbekacin showed similar MIC50 values to amikacin and gentamicin, a lower MIC50 value than tobramycin, and a higher MIC50 value than plazomicin.

Clinical Usefulness of Arbekacin.

Arbekacin is a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Arbekacin has antibacterial activities against high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococci, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii et al. Here, we reviewed in vitro data on arbekacin in Staphylococci and Gram-negative microorganisms. We also reviewed clinical studies for clinical efficacy and microbiologic efficacy data in patients with identified MRSA and suspected MRSA infections. The overall clinical efficacy ranged from 66.7% to 89.7%. The microbiologic efficacy rate ranged from 46.2% to 83%. In comparative studies between arbekacin and glycopeptides, arbekacin was similar to other glycopeptides with respect to clinical and microbiological efficacy rates. Combination trials with other antibiotics suggest that arbekacin will be a promising strategy to control Enterococcus spp. multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa. The major adverse reaction was nephrotoxicity/hepatotoxicity, but patients recovered from most adverse reactions without any severe complications. Based on these results, arbekacin could be a good alternative to vancomycin/teicoplanin in MRSA treatment. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to maximize clinical efficacy and decrease nephrotoxicity.

Clinical efficacy and safety of arbekacin for high-risk infections in patients with hematological malignancies.

We performed a clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of arbekacin (ABK), a unique aminoglycoside with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), in patients with hematological malignancies complicated by high-risk infections. ABK was administered intravenously at a dose of approximately 5 mg/kg with various broad-spectrum ß-lactams, followed by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A total of 54 febrile or infectious episodes were registered, and TDM was performed in 44 (81%) cases. The absolute neutrophil count was below 500/µl in 49 (91%) cases, and cytotoxic chemotherapy was being administered in 47 (87%) cases. Before initiation of ABK, 52 (96%) patients had received fluoroquinolones (n = 37) and/or broad-spectrum ß-lactams (n = 34). There were 10 cases of documented infections including one of MRSA pneumonia, and 44 cases of febrile neutropenia. The efficacy at the end of treatment was 80% for all patients, and efficacy was significantly higher in patients attaining maximum concentrations ≥ 16 µg/ml or receiving TDM-guided dose-adjustment of ABK (n = 19, 95 vs. 71%, P = 0.039). Renal toxicity was observed in six cases (11%) but was generally acceptable. This study demonstrated that TDM-guided ABK administration may be applicable under limited conditions for patients with hematological malignancies.

Antibacterial activity and nephrotoxicity of two novel 2″-amino derivatives of arbekacin.

The antibacterial activity of 2″-amino-2″-deoxyarbekacin (AmABK) and 2″-amino-5,2″-dideoxy-5-epiaminoarbekacin (Am2ABK) was comparable to, or slightly less than, that of arbekacin (ABK) against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including 60 stock cultures and 50 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but more potent against 31 isolates of MRSA possessing an aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme APH(2″)/AAC(6'). AmABK and Am2ABK showed in vivo activity which paralleled in vitro MICs, and were less toxic than ABK in acute toxicity in mice and nephrotoxicity in rats. These results indicate that the 2″-amino group introduced to ABK confers high stabilization to the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, while reducing acute and renal toxicities. l infect Chemother 1996;2:84-89.

Arbekacin treatment of a patient infected with a Pseudomonas putida producing a metallo-beta-lactamase.

Treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas species is difficult because few antibiotics active against such organisms are available. Arbekacin, a relatively new aminoglycoside, is effective against Pseudomonas spp. in vitro. However, no clinical report on arbekacin treatment of a human infection with a multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas has appeared to date. We encountered a case of pneumonia caused by a Pseudomonas strain producing a metallo-beta-lactamase; the patient was successfully treated with arbekacin. A 69-year-old male presented to our hospital experiencing cardiac arrest after rescue from water. Spontaneous circulation had earlier resumed after brief application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient was subjected to induced hypothermia. He experienced severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. The patient regained consciousness on day 8 post-admission. Episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia were recorded on days 5 and 12. The causative organism was a strain of Pseudomonas putida that produced a metallo-beta-lactamase. Combination therapy with arbekacin and levofloxacin successfully resolved the pneumonia. The patient was transferred to another hospital on day 37 to undergo further rehabilitation. Strains of P. putida producing metallo-beta-lactamases have become more widespread in recent years. Colistin is traditionally the drug of last resort to treat infections with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas. However, colistin use is associated with a very high frequency of adverse effects, and the costs of such therapy are not covered by the Japanese health insurance system. Our results indicate that arbekacin is an efficient alternative to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas.

The efficacy and safety of arbekacin and vancomycin for the treatment in skin and soft tissue MRSA infection: preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a one of the most important causes of nosocomial infections, and use of vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infection has increased. Unfortunately, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus have been reported, as well as vancomycin-resistant S. aureus. Arbekacin is an antibacterial agent and belongs to the aminoglycoside family of antibiotics. It was introduced to treat MRSA infection. We studied the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety of arbekacin compared to vancomycin in the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of patients who were admitted to tertiary Hospital from January 1st, 2009 to December 31st, 2010, and received the antibiotics arbekacin or vancomycin. All the skin and soft tissue MRSA infected patients who received arbekacin or vancomycin were enrolled during the study period. The bacteriological efficacy response (BER) was classified with improved and failure. The improved BER was defined as no growth of MRSA, where failure was defined as growth of MRSA, culture at the end of therapy or during treatment. Clinical efficacy response (CER) was classified as improved and failure. Improved CER was defined as resolution or reduction of the majority of signs and symptoms related to the original infection. Failure was defined as no resolution and no reduction of majority of the signs and symptoms, or worsening of one or more signs and symptoms, or new symptoms or signs associated with the original infection or a new infection. RESULTS: Totally, 122 patients (63/99 in arbekacin, 59/168 in vancomycin group) with skin and soft tissue infection who recieved arbekacin or vancomcyin at least 4 days were enrolled and analysed. The bacteriological efficacy response [improved, arbekacin vs vancomycin; 73.0% (46/63), 95% confidence interval (CI) 60.3 to 83.4% vs 83.1% (49/59), 95% CI 71.0 to 91.6%] and clinical efficacy response [improved, arbekacin vs vancomycin; 67.2% (41/61), 95% CI 52.0 to 76.7% vs 78.0% (46/59), 95% CI 65.3 to 87.7%] were similar between the two groups (P=0.264, 0.265). The complication rate was significantly higher in the vancomycin group [29/59(49.2%), 95% CI 35.9 to 62.5%] than arbekacin [10/63(15.9%), 95% CI 8.4 to 29.0%] (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Arbekacin could be considered as an alternative antibiotics for vancomycin in skin and soft tissue infection with MRSA. However, further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Clinical Usefulness of Arbekacin / 감염과화학요법

Arbekacin is a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Arbekacin has antibacterial activities against high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococci, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii et al. Here, we reviewed in vitro data on arbekacin in Staphylococci and Gram-negative microorganisms. We also reviewed clinical studies for clinical efficacy and microbiologic efficacy data in patients with identified MRSA and suspected MRSA infections. The overall clinical efficacy ranged from 66.7% to 89.7%. The microbiologic efficacy rate ranged from 46.2% to 83%. In comparative studies between arbekacin and glycopeptides, arbekacin was similar to other glycopeptides with respect to clinical and microbiological efficacy rates. Combination trials with other antibiotics suggest that arbekacin will be a promising strategy to control Enterococcus spp. multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa. The major adverse reaction was nephrotoxicity/hepatotoxicity, but patients recovered from most adverse reactions without any severe complications. Based on these results, arbekacin could be a good alternative to vancomycin/teicoplanin in MRSA treatment. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to maximize clinical efficacy and decrease nephrotoxicity.

Comparison of Arbekacin and Vancomycin in Treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media by Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of ear infections. We attempted to evaluate the clinical usefulness of arbekacin in treating chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) by comparing its clinical efficacy and toxicity with those of vancomycin. Efficacy was classified according to bacterial elimination or bacteriologic failure and improved or failed clinical efficacy response. Ninety-five subjects were diagnosed with CSOM caused by MRSA. Twenty of these subjects were treated with arbekacin, and 36 with vancomycin. The bacteriological efficacy (bacterial elimination, arbekacin vs. vancomycin: 85.0% vs. 97.2%) and improved clinical efficacy (arbekacin vs. vancomycin; 90.0% vs. 97.2%) were not different between the two groups. However, the rate of complications was higher in the vancomycin group (33.3%) than in the arbekacin group (5.0%) (P=0.020). In addition, a total of 12 adverse reactions were observed in the vancomycin group; two for hepatotoxicity, one for nephrotoxicity, eight for leukopenia, two for skin rash, and one for drug fever. It is suggested that arbekacin be a good alternative drug to vancomycin in treatment of CSOM caused by MRSA.

The Efficacy and Safety of Arbekacin and Vancomycin for the Treatment in Skin and Soft Tissue MRSA Infection: Preliminary Study / 감염과화학요법

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a one of the most important causes of nosocomial infections, and use of vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infection has increased. Unfortunately, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus have been reported, as well as vancomycin-resistant S. aureus. Arbekacin is an antibacterial agent and belongs to the aminoglycoside family of antibiotics. It was introduced to treat MRSA infection. We studied the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety of arbekacin compared to vancomycin in the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of patients who were admitted to tertiary Hospital from January 1st, 2009 to December 31st, 2010, and received the antibiotics arbekacin or vancomycin. All the skin and soft tissue MRSA infected patients who received arbekacin or vancomycin were enrolled during the study period. The bacteriological efficacy response (BER) was classified with improved and failure. The improved BER was defined as no growth of MRSA, where failure was defined as growth of MRSA, culture at the end of therapy or during treatment. Clinical efficacy response (CER) was classified as improved and failure. Improved CER was defined as resolution or reduction of the majority of signs and symptoms related to the original infection. Failure was defined as no resolution and no reduction of majority of the signs and symptoms, or worsening of one or more signs and symptoms, or new symptoms or signs associated with the original infection or a new infection. RESULTS: Totally, 122 patients (63/99 in arbekacin, 59/168 in vancomycin group) with skin and soft tissue infection who recieved arbekacin or vancomcyin at least 4 days were enrolled and analysed. The bacteriological efficacy response [improved, arbekacin vs vancomycin; 73.0% (46/63), 95% confidence interval (CI) 60.3 to 83.4% vs 83.1% (49/59), 95% CI 71.0 to 91.6%] and clinical efficacy response [improved, arbekacin vs vancomycin; 67.2% (41/61), 95% CI 52.0 to 76.7% vs 78.0% (46/59), 95% CI 65.3 to 87.7%] were similar between the two groups (P=0.264, 0.265). The complication rate was significantly higher in the vancomycin group [29/59(49.2%), 95% CI 35.9 to 62.5%] than arbekacin [10/63(15.9%), 95% CI 8.4 to 29.0%] (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Arbekacin could be considered as an alternative antibiotics for vancomycin in skin and soft tissue infection with MRSA. However, further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm this finding.