The role of automated insulin delivery technology in diabetes.

The role of automated insulin delivery systems in diabetes is expanding. Hybrid closed-loop systems are being used in routine clinical practice for treating people with type 1 diabetes. Encouragingly, real-world data reflects the performance and usability observed in clinical trials. We review the commercially available hybrid closed-loop systems, their distinctive features and the associated real-world data. We also consider emerging indications for closed-loop systems, including the treatment of type 2 diabetes where variability of day-to-day insulin requirements is high, and other challenging applications for this technology. We discuss issues around access and implementation of closed-loop technology, and consider the limitations of present closed-loop systems, as well as innovative approaches that are being evaluated to improve their performance.

Comparison between a tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system and a tubeless, on-body sensor-augmented pump in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study compares the efficacy and safety of a tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery (AID) system with that of a tubeless, on-body sensor-augmented pump (SAP). METHODS: This multicentre, parallel-group, RCT was conducted at 13 tertiary medical centres in South Korea. Adults aged 19-69 years with type 1 diabetes who had HbA1c levels of <85.8 mmol/mol (<10.0%) were eligible. The participants were assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive a tubeless, on-body AID system (intervention group) or a tubeless, on-body SAP (control group) for 12 weeks. Stratified block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Blinding was not possible due to the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in range (TIR), blood glucose between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/l, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. ANCOVAs were conducted with baseline values and study centres as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 104 participants underwent randomisation, with 53 in the intervention group and 51 in the control group. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 40±11 years. The mean (±SD) TIR increased from 62.1±17.1% at baseline to 71.5±10.7% over the 12 week trial period in the intervention group and from 64.7±17.0% to 66.9±15.0% in the control group (difference between the adjusted means: 6.5% [95% CI 3.6%, 9.4%], p<0.001). Time below range, time above range, CV and mean glucose levels were also significantly better in the intervention group compared with the control group. HbA1c decreased from 50.9±9.9 mmol/mol (6.8±0.9%) at baseline to 45.9±7.4 mmol/mol (6.4±0.7%) after 12 weeks in the intervention group and from 48.7±9.1 mmol/mol (6.6±0.8%) to 45.7±7.5 mmol/mol (6.3±0.7%) in the control group (difference between the adjusted means: -0.7 mmol/mol [95% CI -2.0, 0.8 mmol/mol] (-0.1% [95% CI -0.2%, 0.1%]), p=0.366). No diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia events occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The use of a tubeless, on-body AID system was safe and associated with superior glycaemic profiles, including TIR, time below range, time above range and CV, than the use of a tubeless, on-body SAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) KCT0008398 FUNDING: The study was funded by a grant from the Korea Medical Device Development Fund supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT; the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy; the Ministry of Health and Welfare; and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (grant number: RS-2020-KD000056).

Effect of artificial pancreas system use on glycaemic control among pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIM: To assess the efficacy of artificial pancreas systems (APS) use among pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) by conducting a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched five databases, including EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library and SCOPUS, for literature on APS use among pregnant women with T1DM before October 9, 2023. The primary endpoint was 24-hour time in range (TIR; 3.5-7.8 mmol/L). Secondary endpoints included glycaemic metrics for 24-hour (mean blood glucose [MBG], time above range [TAR], time below range [TBR]), and overnight TIR and TBR. RESULTS: We identified four randomized controlled trials involving 164 participants; one study with 16 participants focused on overnight APS use, and the other three focused on 24-hour APS use. Compared with standard care, APS exhibited a favourable effect on 24-hour TIR (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25, 0.80, P < 0.001), overnight TIR (SMD = 0.67, 95% CI 0.39, 0.95, P < 0.001), and overnight TBR (<3.5 mmol/L; SMD = -0.49, 95% CI -0.77, -0.21 P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in 24-hour TAR, 24-hour TBR, or MBG between the two groups. We further conducted subgroup analyses after removing the trial focused on overnight APS use and showed that 24-hour APS use reduced not only the 24-hour TIR (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.12, 0.71; P = 0.007) but also the 24-hour TBR (<2.8 mmol/L; SMD = -0.77, 95% CI -1.32, -0.23, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that APS might improve 24-hour TIR and overnight glycaemic control, and 24-hour APS use also significantly reduced 24-hour TBR (2.8 mmol/L) among pregnant women with T1DM.

Usefulness of an interprofessional work manual for perioperative glucose control of an artificial pancreas.

BACKGROUND: A closed-loop bedside-type artificial pancreas for perioperative glucose control has previously been introduced. However, artificial pancreas therapy was often interrupted due to continuous blood sampling failure. We developed an interprofessional work manual to reduce the interruption time of artificial pancreatic therapy for perioperative blood glucose control due to continuous blood sampling failure. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of this manual. METHODS: The manual consisted of the following sections: (1) the roles of the professionals in the preparation and management of the artificial pancreas, (2) how to address continuous blood sampling failure, and (3) checkpoints for interprofessional transfer of the artificial pancreas. We compared the results before the introduction of the manual and 2 years after the introduction of the manual. RESULTS: There were 35 and 37 patients in the Before and After groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient backgrounds between the two groups, although there was significantly less blood loss in the After group (1164 vs. 366 mL; p < 0.001). The mean artificial pancreas therapy and artificial pancreas therapy interruption times were 847 min and 20 min, respectively. Artificial pancreas therapy interruption time (34 vs. 8 min; p = 0.078) and time per interruption (24 vs. 4 min; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the After group than in the Before group. CONCLUSIONS: The interprofessional working manual was useful in reducing the artificial pancreatic therapy interruption time for perioperative glucose control.

An arteriovenous mock circulatory loop and accompanying bond graph model for in vitro study of peripheral intravascular bioartificial organs.

BACKGROUND: Silicon nanopore membrane-based implantable bioartificial organs are dependent on arteriovenous implantation of a mechanically robust and biocompatible hemofilter. The hemofilter acts as a low-resistance, high-flow network, with blood flow physiology similar to arteriovenous shunts commonly created for hemodialysis access. A mock circulatory loop (MCL) that mimics shunt physiology is an essential tool for refinement and durability testing of arteriovenous implantable bioartificial organs and silicon blood-interfacing membranes. We sought to develop a compact and cost-effective MCL to replicate flow conditions through an arteriovenous shunt and used data from the MCL and swine to inform a bond graph mathematical model of the physical setup. METHODS: Flow physiology through bioartificial organ prototypes was obtained in the MCL and during extracorporeal attachment to swine for biologic comparison. The MCL was tested for stability overtime by measuring pressurewave variability over a 48-h period. Data obtained in vitro and extracorporeally informed creation of a bond graph model of the MCL. RESULTS: The arteriovenous MCL was a cost-effective, portable system that reproduced flow rates and pressures consistent with a pulsatile arteriovenous shunt as measured in swine. MCL performance was stable over prolonged use, providing a cost-effective simulator for enhanced testing of peripherally implanted bioartificial organ prototypes. The corresponding bond graph model recapitulates MCL and animal physiology, offering a tool for further refinement of the MCL system.

Effects of an artificial pancreas on postoperative inflammation in patients with esophageal cancer.

PURPOSES: Subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (EC) is associated with high morbidity rates. Tight glycemic control using an artificial pancreas (AP) is one of the promising strategies to reduce postoperative inflammation and morbidities. However, the effects of tight glycemic control using AP in patients with EC are yet to be fully elucidated. METHOD: This study reviewed 96 patients with EC who underwent subtotal esophagectomy. The postoperative inflammation parameters and morbidity rates were compared between patients who used the AP (n = 27) or not (control group, n = 69). AP is a closed-loop system that comprises a continuous glucose monitor and an insulin pump. RESULTS: The numbers of white blood cells (WBC) and Neutrophils (Neut) were noted to be lower in the AP group than in the control group, but with no significant difference. The ratio in which the number of WBC, Neut, and CRP on each postoperative day (POD) was divided by those tested preoperatively was used to standardize the results. The ratio of WBC and Neut on 1POD was significantly lower in the AP group than in the control group. The rate of surgical site infection was lower in the AP group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: AP significantly decreased WBC and Neut on 1POD; this suggests the beneficial effects of AP in alleviating postoperative inflammation.

Real-world use of Control-IQ™ technology automated insulin delivery in pregnancy: A case series with qualitative interviews.

BACKGROUND: Most commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems are not approved for pregnancy use. Information regarding use of the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ™ technology in pregnancy is lacking. AIMS: This case series aimed to explore glycaemic and qualitative experiences of four early adopters of Control-IQ technology in pregnancy. METHODS: Participants used Control-IQ technology in pregnancy and postpartum and consented to analysis of glycaemic data and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Case 1 began Control-IQ technology at 10 weeks gestation. Her pregnancy glucose time-in-range (3.5-7.8 mmol/L [63-140 mg/dL]) increased from 58.7% to 73.3% by third trimester. Cases 2-4 began using Control-IQ technology 0-2 months preconception. Pregnancy time-in-range glucose increased from 73.4% to 78.7%, 78% to 83.6%, and 46.5% to 71.9% between first and third trimesters, respectively. A mid-pregnancy decline in time-in-range glucose was observed in two of the four participants related to suboptimal pump setting adjustments and delays in sensor and infusion set replacement. No diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia occurred. All participants reported reduced diabetes management burden and improved sleep with Control-IQ technology use. CONCLUSIONS: Early adopters of Control-IQ technology safely used this system off-label in pregnancy and reported reduced diabetes management burden and improved sleep. The largest glycaemic improvements were observed among those with the lowest pregnancy time-in-range glucose at the beginning of pregnancy. Participants with low pregnancy glucose time-in-range increased their time-in-range with Control-IQ technology use and participants with high pregnancy glucose time-in-range maintained and increased their time-in-range with less diabetes management burden.

Time requirements for perioperative glucose management using fully closed-loop versus standard insulin therapy: A proof-of-concept time-motion study.

AIMS: To compare the time required for perioperative glucose management using fully automated closed-loop versus standard insulin therapy. METHODS: We performed a time-motion study to quantify the time requirements for perioperative glucose management with fully closed-loop (FCL) and standard insulin therapy applied to theoretical scenarios. Following an analysis of workflows in different periods of perioperative care in elective surgery patients receiving FCL or standard insulin therapy upon hospital admission (pre- and intra-operatively, at the intermediate care unit and general wards), the time of process-specific tasks was measured by shadowing hospital staff. Each task was measured 20 times and its average duration in combination with its frequency according to guidelines was used to calculate the cumulative staff time required for blood glucose management. Cumulative time was calculated for theoretical scenarios consisting of elective minor and major abdominal surgeries (pancreatic surgery and sleeve gastrectomy, respectively) to account for the different care settings and lengths of stay. RESULTS: The FCL insulin therapy reduced the time required for perioperative glucose management compared to standard insulin therapy, across all assessed care periods and for both perioperative pathways (range 2.1-4.5). For a major abdominal surgery, total time required was 248.5 min using FCL versus 753.9 min using standard insulin therapy. For a minor abdominal surgery, total time required was 68.6 min and 133.2 min for FCL and standard insulin therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery for inpatient glucose management has the potential to alleviate the workload of diabetes management in an environment with adequately trained staff.

UK's Association of British Clinical Diabetologist's Diabetes Technology Network (ABCD-DTN): Best practice guide for hybrid closed-loop therapy.

This best practice guide is written with the aim of providing an overview of current hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems in use within the United Kingdom's (UK) National Health Service (NHS) and to provide education and advice for their management on both an individual and clinical service level. The environment of diabetes technology, and particularly HCL systems, is rapidly evolving. The past decade has seen unprecedented advances in the development of HCL systems. These systems improve glycaemic outcomes and reduce the burden of treatment for people with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D). It is anticipated that access to these systems will increase in England as a result of updates in National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance providing broader support for the use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for pwT1D. NICE is currently undertaking multiple-technology appraisal into HCL systems. Based on experience from centres involved in supporting advanced technologies as well as from the recent NHS England HCL pilot, this guide is intended to provide healthcare professionals with UK expert consensus on the best practice for initiation, optimisation and ongoing management of HCL therapy.

One-year real-world performance of the DBLG1 closed-loop system: Data from 3706 adult users with type 1 diabetes in Germany.

AIM: The Diabeloop Generation 1 (DBLG1) system is an interoperable hybrid closed-loop solution that was commercialized in Germany in March 2021. We report the longitudinal glycaemic outcomes among the first 3706 users in a real-world setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective data collection of all consenting adult patients with type 1 diabetes who were equipped in Germany with the DBLG1 system before 30 April 2022, and with a minimum 14 days of closed-loop usage. RESULTS: In total, 3706 users (41% women, age 45.1 ± 14.5 years) met the inclusion criteria, reaching a mean follow-up of 131.0 ± 85.1 days, an overall 485 600 days of continuous glucose monitoring data, and a median time spent in closed-loop of 95.0% (IQR 89.1-97.4). The median percentage time in range (70-180 mg/dl) was 72.1% (IQR 65.0-78.9); the time below 70 mg/dl was 0.9% (0.5-1.7), the time below 54 mg/dl was 0.1% (0.1-0.3), and the median Glucose Management Index was 7.0% (6.8-7.3). Exploratory analysis of a subset of 2460 patients in whom baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was available [7.4% (IQR 6.9-8.0)] showed that the achieved mean time in range was influenced by baseline HbA1c, ranging from 65.8 ± 9.9% (A1c ≥8.5%) to 81.3 ± 6.8% (A1c <6.5%). CONCLUSION: This large real-world analysis confirms the relevance of the DBLG1 automated insulin delivery solution for the achievement of standards of care in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.

Offline reinforcement learning for safer blood glucose control in people with type 1 diabetes.

The widespread adoption of effective hybrid closed loop systems would represent an important milestone of care for people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). These devices typically utilise simple control algorithms to select the optimal insulin dose for maintaining blood glucose levels within a healthy range. Online reinforcement learning (RL) has been utilised as a method for further enhancing glucose control in these devices. Previous approaches have been shown to reduce patient risk and improve time spent in the target range when compared to classical control algorithms, but are prone to instability in the learning process, often resulting in the selection of unsafe actions. This work presents an evaluation of offline RL for developing effective dosing policies without the need for potentially dangerous patient interaction during training. This paper examines the utility of BCQ, CQL and TD3-BC in managing the blood glucose of the 30 virtual patients available within the FDA-approved UVA/Padova glucose dynamics simulator. When trained on less than a tenth of the total training samples required by online RL to achieve stable performance, this work shows that offline RL can significantly increase time in the healthy blood glucose range from 61.6±0.3% to 65.3±0.5% when compared to the strongest state-of-art baseline (p<0.001). This is achieved without any associated increase in low blood glucose events. Offline RL is also shown to be able to correct for common and challenging control scenarios such as incorrect bolus dosing, irregular meal timings and compression errors. The code for this work is available at: https://github.com/hemerson1/offline-glucose.

The Evolution of Diabetes Technology - Options Toward Personalized Care.

OBJECTIVE: Advances in diabetes technology, especially in the last few decades, have transformed our ability to deliver care to persons with diabetes (PWDs). Developments in glucose monitoring, especially continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, have revolutionized diabetes care and empowered our patients to manage their disease. CGM has also played an integral role in advancing automated insulin delivery systems. OBSERVATIONS: Currently available and upcoming advanced hybrid closed-loop systems aim to decrease patient involvement and are approaching the functionality of a fully automated artificial pancreas. Other advances, such as smart insulin pens and daily patch pumps, offer more options for patients and require less complicated and costly technology. Evidence to support the role of diabetes technology is growing, and PWD and clinicians must choose the right type of technology with a personalized strategy to manage diabetes effectively. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Here, we review currently available diabetes technologies, summarize their individual features, and highlight key patient factors to consider when creating a personalized treatment plan. We also address current challenges and barriers to the adoption of diabetes technologies.

Closed-loop insulin delivery in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CRISTAL): a multicentre randomized controlled trial - study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII, insulin pumps) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) in pregnancy, achieving recommended pregnancy glycaemic targets (3.5-7.8 mmol/L or 63-140 mg/dL) remains challenging. Consequently, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes remains high. Outside pregnancy, hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems have led to a paradigm shift in the management of T1D, with 12% higher time in glucose target range (TIR) compared to conventional CSII. However, most commercially available HCL systems are currently not approved for use in pregnancy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of the MiniMed™ 780G HCL system (Medtronic) in T1D in pregnancy. METHODS: In this international, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT), we will compare the MiniMed™ 780G HCL system to standard of care (SoC) in T1D in pregnancy. Women aged 18-45 years with T1D diagnosis of at least one year, HbA1c ≤ 86 mmol/mol (≤ 10%), and confirmed singleton pregnancy up to 11 weeks 6 days will be eligible. After providing written informed consent, all participants will wear a similar CGM system (Guardian™ 3 or Guardian™ 4 CGM) during a 10-day run-in phase. After the run-in phase, participants will be randomised 1:1 to 780G HCL (intervention) or SoC [control, continuation of current T1D treatment with multiple daily injections (MDI) or CSII and any type of CGM] stratified according to centre, baseline HbA1c (< 53 vs. ≥ 53 mmol/mol or < 7 vs. ≥ 7%), and method of insulin delivery (MDI or CSII). The primary outcome will be the time spent within the pregnancy glucose target range, as measured by the CGM at four time points in pregnancy: 14-17, 20-23, 26-29, and 33-36 weeks. Prespecified secondary outcomes will be overnight TIR, time below range (TBR: <3.5 mmol/L or < 63 mg/dL), and overnight TBR. Other outcomes will be exploratory. The planned sample size is 92 participants. The study will end after postpartum discharge from hospital. Analyses will be performed according to intention-to-treat as well as per protocol. DISCUSSION: This large RCT will evaluate a widely used commercially available HCL system in T1D in pregnancy. Recruitment began in January 2021 and was completed in October 2022. Study completion is expected in May 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04520971. Registration date: August 20, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04520971.

What is the optimal range of glycemic control for non-diabetic patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery? A single-center randomized controlled trial using an artificial pancreas.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the optimal target range of perioperative glycemic control for gastroenterological surgery. A closed-loop-type artificial pancreas (AP) was used to diminish the negative impact of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability during tight glycemic control. METHODS: In this single-center randomized trial, non-diabetic patients were assigned to tight (80-110 mg/dL) or moderate glycemic control (110-140 mg/dL) groups between August 2017 and May 2021. AP was used from the intraoperative period until discharge from the intensive care unit. The primary endpoint was the serum interleukin (IL)-6 level on the third postoperative day (3POD), and the secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Recruitment was closed before reaching the planned number of patients due to slow enrollment. Tight glycemic control (n = 62) resulted in lower mean glucose levels than moderate glycemic control (n = 66) (121.3 ± 10.8 mg/dL vs. 133.5 ± 12.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Insulin was administered at a 65% higher rate for tight glycemic control, achieving appropriate glucose control more than 70% of the treatment time. No hypoglycemia occurred during the AP treatment. No significant difference was observed in serum IL-6 levels on 3POD (23.4 ± 31.1 vs. 32.1 ± 131.0 pg/mL, p = 0.64), morbidity rate, surgical mortality rate, or length of hospital stay between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant short-term results did not differ, implying that 80-110 and 110-140 mg/dL are permissible glycemic control ranges when using AP in non-diabetic patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery. (Registered in UMIN; UMIN000028036).

Control of blood glucose levels by an artificial pancreas in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia experience hyperglycemia. It is often difficult to control blood glucose (BG) levels in such patients using standard intravenous insulin infusion therapy. Therefore, we used an artificial pancreas. This study aimed to compare the BG status of the artificial pancreas with that of standard therapy. METHODS: Fifteen patients were included in the study. BG values and the infusion speed of insulin and glucose by the artificial pancreas were collected. Arterial BG and administration rates of insulin, parenteral sugar, and enteral sugar were recorded during the artificial pancreas and standard therapy. The target BG level was 200 mg/dl. RESULTS: Arterial BG was highly correlated with BG data from the artificial pancreas. A higher BG slightly increased the difference between the BG data from the artificial pancreas and arterial BS. No significant difference in arterial BG was observed between the artificial pancreas and standard therapy. However, the standard deviation with the artificial pancreas was smaller than that under standard therapy (p < 0.0001). More points within the target BG range were achieved with the artificial pancreas (180-220 mg/dl) than under standard therapy. The hyperglycemic index of the artificial pancreas (8.7 ± 15.6 mg/dl) was lower than that of standard therapy (16.0 ± 21.5 mg/dl) (p = 0.0387). No incidence of hypoglycemia occurred under the artificial pancreas. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of achieving target BG was higher using artificial pancreas than with standard therapy. An artificial pancreas helps to control BG in critically ill patients.

Effect of intensive insulin therapy on inflammatory response after cardiac surgery using bedside artificial pancreas: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hyperglycemia leads to poor postoperative clinical outcomes, including compromised immune function, cardiovascular events, and mortality. The optimal perioperative blood glucose levels during cardiac surgery remain unclear. A closed-loop glycemic control system (artificial pancreas, target blood glucose range:120-150 mg/dl) prevents postoperative inflammatory response more effectively than conventional insulin therapy (<200 mg/dl). However, the clinical effects of intensive insulin therapy with strict glycemic control (80-110 mg/dl) are controversial. This study aimed to determine whether intensive insulin therapy would further suppress postoperative inflammatory reactions. METHODS: This study analyzed 262 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The patients were divided into two groups according to their target blood glucose range: 80-110 mg/dl and 120-150 mg/dl. The primary outcome was the difference in the C-reactive protein levels between the two groups. RESULTS: Propensity score matching resulted in 95 patients in each group based on their covariates. There was no difference in the postoperative maximum C-reactive protein levels between the two groups (14.81 ± 5.93 mg/dl vs. 14.34 ± 5.52 mg/dl; p = 0.571) following propensity score matching. Hypoglycemia did not occur during intensive insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass did not demonstrate significant advantages in the suppression of postoperative inflammatory reactions compared to that with mild glycemic control. However, intensive insulin therapy using an artificial pancreas was found to be safe, with no hypoglycemic events.

A case of perioperative artificial pancreas therapy for a patient with esophageal cancer with type 1 diabetes.

A 72-year-old female with type 1 diabetes, a history of interstitial pneumonia, and diabetic ketoacidosis was admitted to our hospital with dysphagia. Endoscopy revealed a circumferential neoplastic lesion in the upper to middle esophagus, and a biopsy revealed squamous cell carcinoma. Computed tomography revealed invasion of the left main bronchus, and induction chemotherapy was initiated with a diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. After one course of induction chemotherapy, the tumor size reduced, bronchial invasion improved, and thoracoscopic esophagectomy was performed. During surgery and until 3 days after surgery, the patient's blood glucose level was controlled using an artificial pancreas, and the target blood glucose range was set at 140-180 mg/dL. On the fourth postoperative day, the patient was managed using a sliding scale. Mean blood glucose was 186.7 ± 70.0 mg/dL for 3 days before surgery, 190.5 ± 25.0 mg/dL during artificial pancreas therapy from the surgery to the next day, 169.8 ± 22.0 mg/dL during artificial pancreas therapy on the second to third postoperative days, and 174.5 ± 25.0 mg/dL during sliding scale therapy for 4-15 days after surgery. No hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis was noted.

APSec1.0: Innovative Security Protocol Design with Formal Security Analysis for the Artificial Pancreas System.

The Medical Internet-of-Things (MIoT) has developed revolutionary ways of delivering medical care to patients. An example system, showing increasing demand, is the artificial pancreas system that offers convenience and reliable support care to patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Despite the apparent benefits, the system cannot escape potential cyber threats that may worsen a patient's condition. The security risks need immediate attention to ensure the privacy of the patient and preserve safe functionality. Motivated by this, we proposed a security protocol for the APS environment wherein support to essential security requirements is guaranteed, the security context negotiation is resource-friendly, and the protocol is resilient to emergencies. Accordingly, the security requirements and correctness of the design protocol were formally verified using BAN logic and AVISPA, and proved its feasibility through the emulation of APS in a controlled environment using commercial off-the-shelf devices. Moreover, the results of our performance analysis indicate that the proposed protocol is more efficient than the other existing works and standards.

Adaptive Personalized Prior-Knowledge-Informed Model Predictive Control for Type 1 Diabetes.

This work considers the problem of adaptive prior-informed model predictive control (MPC) formulations that explicitly incorporate prior knowledge in the model development and is robust to missing data in the output measurements. The proposed prediction model is based on a latent variables model to extract glycemic dynamics from highly-correlated data and incorporates prior knowledge of exponential stability to improve the prediction ability. Missing data structures are formulated to enable model predictions when output measurements are missing for short periods of time. Based on the latent variables model, the MPC strategy and adaptive rules are developed to automatically tune the aggressiveness of the MPC. The adaptive prior-knowledge-informed MPC is evaluated with computer simulations for the control of blood glucose concentrations in people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) using simulated virtual patients. Due to the variability among people with T1D, the hyperparameters of the prior-knowledge-informed model are personalized to individual subjects. The percentage of time spent in the target range is 76.48% when there are no missing data and 76.52% when there are missing data episodes lasting up to 30 mins (6 samples). Incorporating the adaptive rules further improves the percentage of time in target range to 84.58% and 84.88% for cases with no missing data and missing data, respectively. The proposed adaptive prior-informed MPC formulation provides robust, effective, and safe regulation of glucose concentration in T1D despite disturbances and missing measurements.

Safety and effectiveness of do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusions in combination with free style libre in people with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: The use of do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems (DIYAPS) among people with type 1 diabetes is increasing. At present, it is unclear how DIYAPS compares with other technologies such as FreeStyle Libre (FSL) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The aim of this analysis is to compare safety, effectiveness and quality-of-life outcomes of DIYAPS use with the addition of FSL to CSII. METHOD: Data from two large UK hospitals were extracted from the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) DIYAPS and FSL audits. Outcomes included HbA1c , glucose TBR (time-below-range), TIR (time-in-range), Diabetes Distress Score (DDS), and Gold hypoglycaemia score. Any adverse events were noted. Changes at follow-up were assessed using paired t-tests and ANOVA in Stata; TIR/TBR at follow-up assessed using unpaired t-tests; chi-square tests assessed the change in frequency of health utilisation (e.g. hospital admissions). RESULTS: DIYAPS (n = 35) and FSL+CSII (n = 149) users, with median follow-up duration of 1.4 (IQR 0.8-2.1) and 1.3 (IQR 0.7-1.8) years, respectively, were included. HbA1c with DIYAPS use changed by -10 mmol/mol [0.9%] (p < 0.001, 95% CI 5, 14 [0.5, 1.3%]) significantly lower (p < 0.001) than in the FSL+CSII group -3 mmol/mol [0.25%] (p < 0.001, 95% CI 1, 4 [0.1, 0.4%]). TIR was higher and TBR was lower in the DIYAPS group. Adverse events were rare in both groups and no significant differences were observed in the frequency of healthcare utilisation. CONCLUSION: DIYAPS use was associated with a lower HbA1c levels, higher TIR and lower TBR compared with FSL+CSII. There was no significant increase in adverse events, although this should be interpreted cautiously given the low numbers of users. Full results from the ABCD DIYAPS audit are awaited.