Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Second-Generation Antihistamine 1 Receptor Blockers and Japanese Kampo Shoseiryuto for Treating Perennial Allergic Rhinitis in Outpatient Settings in Japan.

Objectives: Perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) is common in Japan. Second-generation antihistamines (SGAs) are commonly used for its treatment; however, it remains unclear which SGA is the most cost-effective. Additionally, the pharmacoeconomics of Japanese Kampo shoseiryuto (which was traditionally prescribed to treat PAR in Japan) remains poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of various SGAs and shoseiryuto for the treatment of PAR in Japanese outpatients, from the healthcare payer's perspective. Methods: The most cost- and clinically effective SGAs were determined from a list of 6 SGAs (bepotastine, 10 mg; cetirizine, 10 mg; ebastine, 10 mg; epinastine, 20 mg; loratadine, 10 mg; and olopatadine, 5 mg) together with shoseiryuto, using the overall improvement rate through a model-based analysis. The time horizon was 28 days. Costs were determined based on the Medical Fee Index in 2020. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to address the uncertainty of the base-case results. Results: Overall, bepotastine (10 mg) and ebastine (10 mg) were cost-effective. Shoseiryuto was less cost-effective than ebastine (10 mg) (dominated). Ebastine (10 mg) was the most cost-effective option based on deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Ebastine (10 mg) was the most cost-effective treatment strategy for PAR among the agents evaluated in this study. This insight could aid in establishing an appropriate formulary for treating PAR in hospitals and communities.

Inhibition of RAN attenuates influenza a virus replication and nucleoprotein nuclear export.

Nuclear export of the viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) is a critical step in the influenza A virus (IAV) life cycle and may be an effective target for the development of anti-IAV drugs. The host factor ras-related nuclear protein (RAN) is known to participate in the life cycle of several viruses, but its role in influenza virus replication remains unknown. In the present study, we aimed to determine the function of RAN in influenza virus replication using different cell lines and subtype strains. We found that RAN is essential for the nuclear export of vRNP, as it enhances the binding affinity of XPO1 toward the viral nuclear export protein NS2. Depletion of RAN constrained the vRNP complex in the nucleus and attenuated the replication of various subtypes of influenza virus. Using in silico compound screening, we identified that bepotastine could dissociate the RAN-XPO1-vRNP trimeric complex and exhibit potent antiviral activity against influenza virus both in vitro and in vivo. This study demonstrates the important role of RAN in IAV replication and suggests its potential use as an antiviral target.

Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Bepotastine for Determination of Optimal Dosage Regimen in Pediatric Patients with Allergic Rhinitis or Urticaria.

Bepotastine, a second-generation antihistamine for allergic rhinitis and urticaria, is widely used in all age groups but lacks appropriate dosing guidelines for pediatric patients, leading to off-label prescriptions. We conducted this study to propose an optimal dosing regimen for pediatric patients based on population pharmacokinetic (popPK) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models using data from two previous trials. A popPK model was built using NONMEM software. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and absorption lag time described our data well, with body weight incorporated as the only covariate. A PBPK model was developed using PK-Sim software version 10, and the model well predicted the drug concentrations obtained from pediatric patients. Furthermore, the final PBPK model showed good concordance with the known properties of bepotastine. Appropriate pediatric doses for different weight and age groups were proposed based on the simulations. Discrepancies in recommended doses from the two models were likely due to the incorporation of age-dependent physiological factors in the PBPK model. In conclusion, our study is the first to suggest an optimal oral dosing regimen of bepotastine in pediatric patients using both approaches. This is expected to foster safer and more productive use of the drug.

The Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Compared With Hydroxyzine Pamoate for Preventing Infusion Reactions to the First Dose of Rituximab in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Protocol for a Phase II, Double-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, can cause infusion reactions (IRs), especially during the initial rituximab infusion therapy. Generally, patients are administered a histamine H1-receptor antagonist before the rituximab infusion, along with an antipyretic analgesic, to prevent or reduce IRs. Multiple retrospective case-control studies indicate that the second generation of histamine H1-receptor antagonists might be more effective than the first generation in suppressing IRs caused by the rituximab infusion. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of first- and second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists for preventing IRs resulting from the initial infusion of rituximab in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: This is a phase II, double-blind, active-controlled randomized trial. It will be a multicenter study conducted across 3 facilities that aims to enroll a total of 40 patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma who will receive their initial rituximab infusion. Participating patients will be administered hydroxyzine pamoate or bepotastine besilate, representing first- or second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists, respectively. This will be combined with 400-mg acetaminophen tablets taken approximately 30 minutes before the first infusion of rituximab. The primary end point of this trial is to assess severe IRs, equivalent to grade 2 or higher as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, that occur within a 4-hour period after the initiation of rituximab infusion. The secondary end points include assessing the severity of the initial IR, the maximum severity of the IR, and the duration between rituximab infusion initiation and the onset of the first IR within a 4-hour period. Additionally, the trial will evaluate histamine H1-receptor antagonist-induced drowsiness using the visual analogue scale, with each patient providing their individual response. RESULTS: This study began with patient recruitment in April 2023, with 17 participants enrolled as of November 12, 2023. The anticipated study completion is set for February 2026. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of oral first- and second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists in preventing IRs induced by the initial administration of rituximab. The findings from this study hold the potential to establish the rationale for a phase III study aimed at determining the standard premedication protocol for rituximab infusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs051220169; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs051220169. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54882.

Comparative study on the efficacy and safety of bepotastine besilate versus levocetirizine in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A randomised, open-label, parallel study.

Background Urticaria is a common skin disease which often causes impairment in the quality of life. The ideal drug for chronic urticaria would have antihistaminic and anti-inflammatory actions. Bepotastine besilate is a recently approved novel anti-allergic agent with multiple mechanisms of action; levocetirizine is a potent and selective second-generation H1 receptor antagonist used in the treatment of urticaria. Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of bepotastine besilate versus levocetirizine in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Methods The study design is a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, prospective interventional study. The study subjects were randomly assigned to either of the two groups a and b, each group had 50 patients with chronic urticaria. Statistical analyses were performed using (SPSS, version 18) for all the variables. Chi-square test was used for comparison between categorical variables. An unpaired student's t-test was done for quantitative variables. Results There was a significant decrease in mean urticaria activity score (P < 0.001), chronic urticaria quality of life (P < 0.001) and clinical global improvement (P < 0.001) in both the treatment groups but this improvement was higher in the bepotastine than in the levocetirizine group. There was no significant difference in the mean of absolute eosinophil count, C-reactive protein, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase from baseline to 4th week between the two study groups. Visual analogue scale showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to 4th week (P < 0.001) of follow-up but this increase was higher in levocetirizine group (0.64-4.24) than in bepotastine group (0.56-2.56) Limitations Blinding was not done. To assess the efficacy and safety of bepotastine, a larger study can be planned. Conclusion This study found that bepotastine is superior to levocetirizine and showed a statistically significant reduction in mean urticaria activity score 7, improved quality of life and clinical global improvement in patients with urticaria.

Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Purpose: To study the efficacy and toxic effects of bepotastine besilate 1.5% preservative-free (BB-PF) and olopatadine 0.2% BAK-preserved (OL-BAK) drops on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Patients and Methods: Ninety-seven patients with allergic conjunctivitis diagnosis participated in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients received either BB-PF (n=48) or OL-BAK (n=49), both administered once daily in the morning. The patients were followed for 60 days. Ocular itching was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included ocular symptoms, signs, and non-ocular symptoms associated with rhinoconjunctivitis. Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) was performed to evaluate histopathological changes related to the toxic effects of preservatives. Results: BB-PF treatment was associated with a 1.30 more probability of diminished ocular itching than OL-BAK (odds ratio (OR)=1.30; 95% CI=(0.96-1.7); p=0.086). No statistically significant differences were found between treatments in the resolution of other ocular symptoms or signs, except for tearing, which was superior in the BB-PF (OR=1.37; 95% (1.26-1.47); p<0.0001). BB-PF was superior in terms of the resolution of rhinorrhea (p=0.040) and nasal itching (p=0.037). After 60 days of treatment, the BB-PF group exhibited 2.0 times higher probability of having a lower Nelson scale score compared to the OL-BAK group (OR=2.00; 95% CI=(1.19-3.34); p=0.010). Conclusion: Both medications presented a similar efficacy in terms of the resolution of ocular signs and symptoms associated with ocular conjunctivitis. BB-PF is superior in the resolution of non-ocular symptoms and safer for the ocular surface than OL-BAK.

Old versus new antihistamines: Effects on cognition and psychomotor functions.

Context: Antihistamines (AHs) are the most widely long-term therapeutic option to manage allergic diseases. This research aimed to study the effects of long-term administration of AHs: on cognitive (memory, mood, attention, sleep and executive function) and psychomotor performance. Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational study for a total duration of 30 months was carried out at the Dermatology OPD in adult patients with dermatological condition who were newly prescribed either chlorpheniramine (4 mg, BD), levocetirizine (10 mg, OD), fexofenadine (180 mg, OD) or bepotastine (10 mg, BD) for at least 28 days as per inclusion and exclusion criteria after taking written informed consent. A detailed history of the patients, memory (using PGI memory scale) and psychomotor functions, Brief Mood Introspection Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale were assessed at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks. Data obtained were analysed using paired sample t-test and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis (P-value <0.05 statistically significant). Results: A total of 22 in chlorpheniramine group, 23 in levocetirizine group, 20 in fexofenadine group and 18 in bepotastine group were analysed. Chlorpheniramine and levocetirizine had deteriorating effects on cognitive and psychomotor performance, whereas fexofenadine and bepotastine showed positive effect on various cognitive and psychometric tasks. The study results showed chlorpheniramine and levocetirizine to be having sedative effects, whereas fexofenadine was nonsedating. In bepotastine group, no effect on sleep was observed. No significant difference in mood scores was observed in between chlorpheniramine, levocetirizine and fexofenadine groups. In bepotastine group, arousal calm and positive tired scores increased at 4 week as compared to baseline. Conclusion: Patients with dermatological illnesses can be prescribed fexofenedine and bepotastine, as compared to chlorpheniramine and levocetirizine, and their cognitive and psychological functions should be evaluated periodically with suitable tests.

An Investigator-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Effectiveness, Safety of Levocetirizine and Bepotastine in Chronic Urticaria.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic urticaria is common and distressing dermatosis where the search for newer agents with improved effectiveness and tolerability profile is a felt need. Bepotastine, a second-generation antihistamine, with added effect on suppression of eosinophil migration has a prospect in the management of chronic urticaria. AIMS: To assess and compare effectiveness and safety of bepotastine versus levocetirizine in chronic urticaria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center, investigator-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group phase IV trial (CTRI REF/2018/04/019692) conducted on adult patients of chronic urticaria of either sex. Patients were randomized into receiving either bepotastine besilate 10 mg tablet twice daily or levocetirizine 5 mg tablet once daily with fortnightly follow-up for 6 follow-up visits after thebaseline evaluation. The primary outcome measures were Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) and Urticaria Total Severity Score (TSS). Routine hematological, biochemical tests, treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Thirty patients in the bepotastine group and 29 patients in the levocetirizine group were analyzed by modified-intention-to-treat criteria. The study groups were comparable at the baseline with respect to the severity of chronic urticaria. UAS7 and TSS reduced significantly (P < 0.001, Friedman's ANOVA) in both treatment groups from 1st follow-up visit and 2nd follow-up visits (P < 0.05, Post Hoc Dunn's test) At the test-of-cure visit, UAS7 (5.13 ± 8.21 vs 7.48 ± 8.96) and TSS (5.10 ± 4.06 vs 7.07 ± 4.48) were less with bepotastine than levocetirizine although not statistically significant (P = 0.188 and 0.073, respectively, Mann-Whitney U test). Sedation during daytime was found to be significantly more (P < 0.001, Fischer's exact test) with levocetirizine than bepotastine (73.3% vs 17.2%). CONCLUSION: Bepotastine is comparable to levocetirizine with respect to its effectiveness with an edge in terms of side-effect (sedation during day time); thus, it offers a new therapeutic option in chronic urticaria.

Comparative analysis of safety and efficacy of Alcaftadine 0.25%, Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% and Bepotastine besilate 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of Alcaftadine 0.25%, Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2%, and Bepotastine besilate 1.5% ophthalmic solutions in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Methods: This is a prospective, observer-masked, comparative study of 180 patients with mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis, randomized into three groups of 60 patients each. Each group was assigned to be treated with one of the three treatment options namely Alcaftadine 0.25%, Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% and Bepotastine besilate 1.5% ophthalmic solutions. Patients were followed-up at regular intervals with relief and resolution of symptoms and signs noted using Total Ocular Scoring System (TOSS) and hyperaemia scale. Results: All three topical medications were effective in resolving symptoms of the patients with mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis. Baseline mean TOSS scores for Alcaftadine group, Olopatadine group and Bepotastine besilate group were (7.68±2.32), (7.65±2.32) and (7.45±2.27) respectively as compared to the corresponding TOSS scores on 14th Day (4th visit) which were (0.2 ± 0.43), (0.4 ± 0.56) and (0.1 ± 0.36) respectively. The resolution of symptoms in the Bepotastine and Alcaftadine groups was significantly profound as compared to the Olopatadine group (p = 0.008). Bepotastine and Alcaftadine groups significantly reduced allergic conjunctivitis symptoms compared to Olopatadine group (p = 0.008). Conclusion: All three topical ophthalmic medications used in the study are safe and effective in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. However, Bepotastine and Alcaftadine appear to outweigh Olopatadine in resolving the symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution and bepotastine 1.5% ophthalmic solution in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis in a tertiary care hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Vernal conjunctivitis comprises 0.5% of allergic eye diseases. The study is intended to collate the effectiveness of drugs by observing the reduction in signs and symptoms. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic drops with bepotastine besilate 1.5% ophthalmic drops in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, comparative study conducted in Sarojini Devi Eye Hospital, Telangana. The study included 50 patients diagnosed with VKC, of which Group A and Group B were given olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic drops and bepotastine besilate 1.5% ophthalmic drops, respectively, twice a day for 8 weeks. The reduction in signs and symptoms in both groups was compared. The observations and results were tabulated accordingly, and data were analyzed using the SPSS. The unpaired t-test is used as the test of significance in between two groups. P value is statistically significant when it is less than 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 50 cases were included in the study, 72% of total patients were in the age group of 5-10 years, and 28% were in the age group of 11-15 years. There were 39 males and 11 females. After 8 weeks of follow-up, the mean reduction in the scoring of symptoms and signs provided better and quicker relief of watering, ocular discomfort, and conjunctival hyperemia with bepotastine 1.5% eye drops. Olopatadine 0.1% eye drops provided faster improvement in papillary hypertrophy. Both drugs were equally effective in reducing itching. Laboratory findings of absolute eosinophil count had no statistical significance in between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, based on the evaluation of therapeutic performance, bepotastine eye drops proved quicker relief of symptoms and signs compared to olopatadine eye drops but was not statistically significant which would prove beneficial for the patients.

Characterization of Photodegradation Products of Bepotastine Besilate and In Silico Evaluation of Their Physicochemical, Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicity Properties.

Bepotastine (BPT) is a H1-receptor antagonist. It is used as a besilate salt in ophthalmic solution for allergic conjunctivitis and orally for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria/pruritus. Its systematic forced degradation study is unreported. The same was carried out in different conditions prescribed by International Conference on Harmonisation. The stressed solutions were subjected to reversed phase liquid chromatographic analysis, and BPT was observed to be labile under photobasic condition only, yielding 5 photodegradation products. The structures of the latter were elucidated from data generated by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and multistage mass spectrometry. Of the 5, 4 products were further isolated and subjected to nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to justify the proposed structures. Two of them, with similar accurate mass, were additionally and unambiguously characterized from their heteronuclear multiple bond correlation data, hydrogen deuterium exchange mass data, and quantum chemical analysis using density functional theory calculations. One degradation product had a structure that could only be explained by unusual rearrangement involving conversions of N-oxide into hydroxylamine, similar to Meisenheimer rearrangement. The physicochemical, as well as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties of BPT and its characterized photodegradation products were evaluated in silico by ADMET Predictor™ software.

Observer-masked trial comparing efficacy of topical olopatadine (0.1%), bepotastine (1.5%), and alcaftadine (0.25%) in mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis.

Purpose: With increasing environmental pollution, the incidence of allergic conjunctivitis is increasing. Newer anti-allergic medications with combined anti-histaminic and mast cell stabilization action can help reducing the use of topical steroids for milder form of disease. There is no study directly comparing olopatadine (0.1%), bepotastine (1.5%), and alcaftadine (0.25%) for mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis cases. Hence, we decided to methodically study the efficacy of three topical medications. Methods: Prospective, observer-masked clinical trial enrolled 45 patients with 15 patients in each of the three groups. Patients with mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis were sequentially assigned to respective groups, and relief of symptoms and signs were noted upto 1-month follow-up. Results: All three topical medications faired almost equally in resolving symptoms of the patients with mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis, and most of them reported complete relief after 1 week of use of medication. Few cases with limbal or palpebral papillae reported symptomatic relief after use of medication, but the resolution of these signs was not noted in all three groups. Conclusion: We concluded similar efficacy of three medications in relieving symptoms and inefficacy in regressing palpebral and limbal papillae in cases of allergic conjunctivitis.

Simultaneous determination of bepotastine and hydroxychloroquine concentrations in human breast milk by LC-MS/MS / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To establish a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry （LC-MS/MS） method for the simultaneous determination of bepotastine and hydroxychloroquine concentrations in human breast milk and apply it in clinical practice. METHODS The milk samples （50 μL） were precipitated with 200 μL methanol containing the internal standard （100 ng/mL chloroquine）， and the supernatant was taken for analysis after vortexing and centrifugation. The separation was performed on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column with mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid-10 mmol/L ammonium acetate solution （phase A） and methanol （phase B） at gradient elution of 0.35 mL/min. The injection volume was 2 μL， and the analysis time was 4 min. The detection of the analytes was performed by electrospray ionization in positive mode by multiple reaction monitoring with the transition of m/z 388.9→201.9 （bepotastine）， m/z 336.3→247.1 （hydroxychloroquine）， and m/z 320.2→247.2 （chloroquine）. The established LC-MS/MS method was researched in methodology and used to determine the drug concentrations in the breast milk of 1 case of lactating patient. RESULTS The linear range of bepotastine was 2-200 ng/mL（ r＝0.999）， and hydroxychloroquine was 50-1 000 ng/mL （r＝0.998）. The intra-assay and inter-assay precisions were both ≤15%， and the accuracy， extraction recovery， matrix effect， and stability all met the acceptance criteria for bioanalytical method validation. The concentration result of bepotastine and hydroxychloroquine in the breast milk of the lactating patient showed， after 2 h and 14 h， the concentrations of bepotastine in the breast milk of the patient were 34.95 ng/mL and 5.72 ng/mL； those of hydroxychloroquine were 211.92 ng/mL and 104.18 ng/mL， respectively. The relative infant doses were 1.83% and 0.56%， respectively. CONCLUSIONS The established method is simple， rapid， and sensitive. It is suitable for simultaneous determination of bepotastine and hydroxychloroquine concentrations in human milk and can provide reference for safe drug use during lactation.

Simultaneous determination of bepotastine and hydroxychloroquine concentrations in human breast milk by LC-MS/MS / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To establish a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry （LC-MS/MS） method for the simultaneous determination of bepotastine and hydroxychloroquine concentrations in human breast milk and apply it in clinical practice. METHODS The milk samples （50 μL） were precipitated with 200 μL methanol containing the internal standard （100 ng/mL chloroquine）， and the supernatant was taken for analysis after vortexing and centrifugation. The separation was performed on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column with mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid-10 mmol/L ammonium acetate solution （phase A） and methanol （phase B） at gradient elution of 0.35 mL/min. The injection volume was 2 μL， and the analysis time was 4 min. The detection of the analytes was performed by electrospray ionization in positive mode by multiple reaction monitoring with the transition of m/z 388.9→201.9 （bepotastine）， m/z 336.3→247.1 （hydroxychloroquine）， and m/z 320.2→247.2 （chloroquine）. The established LC-MS/MS method was researched in methodology and used to determine the drug concentrations in the breast milk of 1 case of lactating patient. RESULTS The linear range of bepotastine was 2-200 ng/mL（ r＝0.999）， and hydroxychloroquine was 50-1 000 ng/mL （r＝0.998）. The intra-assay and inter-assay precisions were both ≤15%， and the accuracy， extraction recovery， matrix effect， and stability all met the acceptance criteria for bioanalytical method validation. The concentration result of bepotastine and hydroxychloroquine in the breast milk of the lactating patient showed， after 2 h and 14 h， the concentrations of bepotastine in the breast milk of the patient were 34.95 ng/mL and 5.72 ng/mL； those of hydroxychloroquine were 211.92 ng/mL and 104.18 ng/mL， respectively. The relative infant doses were 1.83% and 0.56%， respectively. CONCLUSIONS The established method is simple， rapid， and sensitive. It is suitable for simultaneous determination of bepotastine and hydroxychloroquine concentrations in human milk and can provide reference for safe drug use during lactation.

Bepotastine besilate for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

INTRODUCTION: Bepotastine besilate (BB) is a second-generation H1-antihistamine that, as an ophthalmic solution, is approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. In other countries, the oral presentation of BB is widely used for the improvement of symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR) as well as urticaria and chronic pruritus with results similar to those by other drugs of the same class. Areas covered: This article was created from a comprehensive literature search with information taken from clinical trials. The articles that have been selected evaluate the clinical and non-clinical pharmacology of BB as well as its use in AR and its efficiency in the improvement of symptoms, its safety, common adverse effects, and overall experiences of its use. Expert opinion: BB is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Side effects are infrequent in patients with AR who do not have kidney or liver disease. Clinical trial experience with oral bepotastine outside the United States has confirmed its safety. BB can be useful as a therapeutic option in patients with AR who would like to explore an alternative to the currently available once-daily oral H1-antihistamines.

Bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution 1.5% for alleviating nasal symptoms in patients with allergic conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution (BBOS) 1.5% is a topical antihistamine for the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis (AC). Allergic rhinitis and AC are common comorbid conditions. We explored the efficacy of BBOS 1.5% in alleviating nasal symptoms in an integrated analysis of two Phase III conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) studies and a Phase IV environmental allergen study. METHODS: In the Phase III trials, a CAC was performed 15 minutes, 8 hours, and 16 hours following ocular instillation of BBOS 1.5% (n=78) or placebo (n=79), and subjects evaluated nasal symptoms. In the environmental study, subjects instilled BBOS 1.5% (n=123) or placebo (n=122) twice daily and nasal symptoms were evaluated over 2 weeks. RESULTS: In the Phase III trials, BBOS 1.5% had reduced CAC-induced nasal congestion and pruritus at 15 minutes and 8 hours postdosing and rhinorrhea and a non-ocular composite-symptom score (sum of nasal scores plus ear or palate pruritus) at all time points postdosing (all P≤0.01 vs placebo). In the Phase IV environmental study, BBOS 1.5% reduced sneezing and nasal pruritus over 2 weeks and median number of days to improvement of nasal pruritus and total nasal symptom score (sum for rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal pruritus, and nasal congestion; P≤0.04 vs placebo). Additionally, investigator-reported improvement in overall ocular (pruritus, hyperemia, tearing) and nasal symptoms was greater with BBOS 1.5% vs placebo (P≤0.03). CONCLUSION: Results of these exploratory analyses indicate that topical ocular BBOS 1.5% reduced nasal symptoms, supporting its use for alleviating rhinitis symptoms associated with AC.

Double-blind placebo-controlled study of bepotastine besilate in pediatric patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Although second-generation antihistamines, such as bepotastine besilate, are recommended as a first-line treatment option for adult perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR), few non-sedating second-generation antihistamines are safe for children. OBJECTIVE: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study of 473 pediatric PAR patients (7 - 15 years old) to determine the superiority and safety of bepotastine besilate (10 mg twice daily) relative to placebo for improved total and individual nasal symptom scores compared with baseline. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects were randomized to placebo (n = 233) or bepotastine besilate (n = 240, 10 mg orally twice daily for 2 weeks). Interference of daily life by PAR was assessed by measuring change in individual nasal symptom scores from baseline. RESULTS: Bepotastine besilate was superior to placebo in terms of total nasal symptom scores, with improved overall nasal symptoms of PAR compared with baseline values. Subgroup analyses demonstrated bepotastine besilate was effective irrespective of age, sex or body weight. No clinically significant adverse drug reactions often observed with first-generation antihistamines were reported and no difference in adverse events between groups was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bepotastine besilate is effective and safe for pediatric PAR patients aged 7 - 15 years, and has a significant clinical impact on PAR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01861522 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01861522 ).

Comparative fasting bioavailability of 2 bepotastine formulations in healthy male Chinese volunteers: an open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-way crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Bepotastine is a second-generation histamine1 receptor antagonist that is used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, urticaria, and pruritus associated with skin disease. A new generic formulation of bepotastine has been developed in China, and information concerning bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties in the Chinese population has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of 2 tablet formulations of bepotastine, the 10-mg generic formulation (test) and a branded formulation (reference), in healthy male Chinese volunteers to obtain registration approval of the test formulation. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study with a 1-week washout period was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers. Blood samples were collected for 16 hours after a single dose of the 10-mg bepotastine test formulation or the reference formulation. Plasma bepotastine concentrations were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and t½ were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for the log-transformed Cmax and AUC values were within the predetermined interval of 75% to 133% and 80% to 125%, respectively, according to the guidelines of the China Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and reference drugs, including Cmax (74.81 [9.91] ng/mL vs 78.60 [29.58] ng/mL), AUC0-t (295.55[115.29] ng·h/mL vs 299.17[109.29] ng·h/mL), and AUC0-∞ (305.28 [118.50] ng·h/mL vs 310.90 [112.20] ng·h/mL). The mean (SD) t½ values of the test and reference formulations were 2.53 (0.50) hours and 2.62 (0.41) hours, respectively. The 90% CIs of the treatment ratios for the logarithmic transformed values of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 86.96% to 101.80%, 93.22% to 104.13%, and 92.66% to 103.30%, respectively. All values were within the predetermined bioequivalence range. Two adverse events were reported as neutropenia (1 volunteer [4.2%]) and neutrophilia (1 volunteer [4.2%]). Both adverse events were transient and considered mild by physicians. CONCLUSION: The test and reference tablets met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence as defined by the China Food and Drug Administration. Both formulations were well tolerated. Chinese Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ChiCTR-TTRCC-13003723.

Preparation and Quality Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate Film-coated Tablets / 中国药师

Objective: To prepare bepotastine besilate film-coated tablets, determine the dissolution rate by HPLC, and evaluate the similarity of dissolution curves for self-made tablets and the original tablets. Methods: Bepotastine besilate tablets were prepared by using microcrystalline cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, mannitol, aspartame and magnesium stearate as the accessories. Bepotas-tine besilate film-coated tablets were prepared by using OpadryⅡpremixed spray-coating liquid. The formulation was screened with the angle of repose, disintegration time, content uniformity and dissolution rate as the indices. The coating material amount was screened with the dissolution rate as the index. Results: The optimal formulation of bepotastine besilate film-coated tablet contained bepotastine besilate 5 mg,mannitol 43 mg,microcrystalline cellulose 21. 5mg,aspartame 0. 5 mg,magnesium stearate 0. 5 mg and hydroxypropyl cellulose 15 mg. The optimal weight of coating material was 5% . The self-made tablets and the original tablets had similar dissolution behavior in 4 media including water, hydrochloric acid(pH 1. 2), acetate buffer solution(pH 4. 5) and phosphate buffer solution(pH 6. 8). Conclusion:The self-made tablets have similar dissolution behavior in vitro with the original tablets, and their quality is similar.