C5a-licensed phagocytes drive sterilizing immunity during systemic fungal infection.

Systemic candidiasis is a common, high-mortality, nosocomial fungal infection. Unexpectedly, it has emerged as a complication of anti-complement C5-targeted monoclonal antibody treatment, indicating a critical niche for C5 in antifungal immunity. We identified transcription of complement system genes as the top biological pathway induced in candidemic patients and as predictive of candidemia. Mechanistically, C5a-C5aR1 promoted fungal clearance and host survival in a mouse model of systemic candidiasis by stimulating phagocyte effector function and ERK- and AKT-dependent survival in infected tissues. C5ar1 ablation rewired macrophage metabolism downstream of mTOR, promoting their apoptosis and enhancing mortality through kidney injury. Besides hepatocyte-derived C5, local C5 produced intrinsically by phagocytes provided a key substrate for antifungal protection. Lower serum C5a concentrations or a C5 polymorphism that decreases leukocyte C5 expression correlated independently with poor patient outcomes. Thus, local, phagocyte-derived C5 production licenses phagocyte antimicrobial function and confers innate protection during systemic fungal infection.

Regulatory Considerations in the Approval of Rezafungin (Rezzayo) for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis in Adults.

On 22 March 2023, the FDA approved rezafungin (Rezzayo) for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options. Rezafungin is an echinocandin that supports weekly dosing, enabling outpatient parenteral treatment that potentially avoids the need for a central venous catheter. Approval of rezafungin was based on a single adequate and well-controlled phase 3 study designed with a day 30 all-cause mortality primary end point and 20% noninferiority margin, which demonstrated that rezafungin is noninferior to the comparator echinocandin. Nonclinical studies of rezafungin in nonhuman primates identified a neurotoxicity safety signal; however, rezafungin's safety profile in the completed clinical studies was similar to other Food and Drug Administration-approved echinocandins. Here we describe the rationale for this approval and important considerations during the review process for a flexible development program intended to expedite the availability of antimicrobial therapies to treat serious infections in patients with limited treatment options. Clinical Trials Registration . NCT02734862 and NCT03667690.

Treatment Outcomes Among Patients With a Positive Candida Culture Close to Randomization Receiving Rezafungin or Caspofungin in the ReSTORE Study.

BACKGROUND: Rezafungin, a novel, once-weekly echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC) was non-inferior to caspofungin for Day 30 all-cause mortality (ACM) and Day 14 global cure in the Phase 3 ReSTORE trial (NCT03667690). We conducted pre-planned subgroup analyses for patients with a positive culture close to randomization in ReSTORE. METHODS: ReSTORE was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial in patients aged ≥18 years with candidemia and/or IC treated with once-weekly intravenous rezafungin (400 mg/200 mg) or once-daily intravenous caspofungin (70 mg/50 mg). This analysis comprised patients with a positive blood culture drawn between 12 hours before and 72 hours after randomization, or a positive culture from another normally sterile site sampled between 48 hours before and 72 hours after randomization. Efficacy endpoints included Day 30 ACM, Day 14 global cure rate, and Day 5 and 14 mycological response. Adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: This analysis included 38 patients randomized to rezafungin and 46 to caspofungin. In the rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively: Day 30 ACM was 26.3% and 21.7% (between-group difference [95% confidence interval] 4.6% [-13.7, 23.5]); Day 14 global response was 55.3% and 50.0% (between-group difference 5.3% [-16.1, 26.0]); and Day 5 mycological eradication was 71.1% and 50.0% (between-group difference 21.1% [-0.2, 40.2]). Safety was comparable between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the efficacy and safety of rezafungin compared with caspofungin for the treatment of candidemia and/or IC in patients with a positive culture close to randomization, with potential early treatment benefits for rezafungin.

Outcomes by Candida spp. in the ReSTORE Phase 3 trial of rezafungin versus caspofungin for candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis.

Rezafungin is a long-acting, intravenously administered echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis (IC). Non-inferiority of rezafungin vs caspofungin for the treatment of adults with candidemia and/or IC was demonstrated in the Phase 3 ReSTORE study based on the primary endpoints of day 14 global cure and 30-day all-cause mortality. Here, an analysis of ReSTORE data evaluating efficacy outcomes by baseline Candida species is described. Susceptibility testing was performed for Candida species using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference broth microdilution method. There were 93 patients in the modified intent-to-treat population who received rezafungin; 94 received caspofungin. Baseline Candida species distribution was similar in the two treatment groups; C. albicans (occurring in 41.9% and 42.6% of patients in the rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively), C. glabrata (25.8% and 26.6%), and C. tropicalis (21.5% and 18.1%) were the most common pathogens. Rates of global cure and mycological eradication at day 14 and day 30 all-cause mortality by Candida species were comparable in the rezafungin and caspofungin treatment groups and did not appear to be impacted by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for either rezafungin or caspofungin. Two patients had baseline isolates with non-susceptible MIC values (both in the rezafungin group: one non-susceptible to rezafungin and one to caspofungin, classified as intermediate); both were candidemia-only patients in whom rezafungin treatment was successful based on the day 30 all-cause mortality endpoint. This analysis of ReSTORE demonstrated the efficacy of rezafungin for candidemia and IC in patients infected with a variety of Candida species.

Candida auris central line-associated blood stream infection in critically ill patients: the worst end of a bad scenario.

BACKGROUND: Candida auris (C. auris) is an emerging aggressive pathogen that causes severe infections in critically ill patients. Therefore, the assessment of this pathogen, characterized by inclination for biofilm formation, elevated colonization rate, and resistance to multiple drugs, holds a paramount importance. There is no data regarding the isolation of C. auris in our tertiary care hospitals' intensive care units (ICUs). The current case study was arranged to assess the incidence of C. auris central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) problem in our (ICUs). METHODS: Specimens of central venous catheter blood, peripheral blood, and catheter tips were collected from 301 critically ill patients with suspected (CLABSI). Microbiological cultures were utilized to diagnose bacterial and fungal superinfections. The fungal species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing were conducted using the Brilliance Chrome agar, VITEK® 2 compact system, and MALDI-TOF MS. RESULTS: All included specimens (100%) yielded significant growth. Only 14 specimens (4.7%) showed fungal growth in the form of different Candida species. When comparing the identification of C. auris, MALDI-TOF MS is considered the most reliable method. Brilliance CHROMagar demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%, whereas VITEK only showed a sensitivity of approximately 33%. All recovered isolates of C. auris were fluconazole resistant. CONCLUSION: C. auris is a highly resistant emerging pathogen in our ICUs that is often overlooked in identification using conventional methods.

Epidemiology of candidemia during COVID-19 pandemic era in a teaching hospital: A non-concurrent cohort study.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in the incidence of bloodstream infections caused by fungi of the Candida genus, also known as candidemia, was observed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study aimed to assess the incidence of candidemia, the factors related to COVID-19-associated candidemia (CAC), and prognostic factors. A non-concurrent cohort of 87 cases of patients aged over 18 years with candidemia between March 2020 and February 2022 was evaluated. Incidence density (ID) was calculated by the number of patient-days during the period. All causes of mortality within 30 days of observation were considered. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used, respectively, to determine factors associated with CAC and prognostic factors. Values <0.05 were considered significant. The ID of CAC was eight times higher than candidemia in patients without COVID-19 [2.40 per 1000 person-days vs. 0.27 per 1000 person-days; P < .01]. The corticosteroid therapy was as an independent factor associated with CAC [OR = 15.98 (3.64-70.03), P < .01], while abdominal surgery was associated with candidemia in patients without COVID-19 [OR = 0.09 (0.01-0.88), P = .04]. Both patients with and without COVID-19 had a high 30 days-mortality rate (80.8% vs. 73.8%, respectively; P = .59). Liver disease [HR = 3.36 (1.22-9.27); P = .02] and the Charlson score [HR = 1.17 (1.01-1.34); P = .03] were independent factors of death, while the use of antifungals [HR = 0.15 (0.07-0.33); P < .01] and removal of the central venous catheter [HR = 0.26 (0.12-0.56); P < .01] independently reduced the risk of death. These findings highlight the high incidence of candidemia in COVID-19 patients and its elevated mortality.

This study found that bloodstream infections by Candida spp. were significantly more common in patients with than without COVID-19, and Candida glabrata played a significant role in these infections. Liver disease and a higher number of comorbidities were associated with an increased risk of death.

Comparative efficacies of the three echinocandins for Candida auris candidemia: real world evidence from a tertiary centre in India.

Though echinocandins are the first line of therapy for C. auris candidemia, there is little clinical data to guide the choice of therapy within this class. This was the first study to compare the three echinocandins in terms of efficacy and outcomes for C. auris candidemia. This was a retrospective analysis of 82 episodes of candidemia caused by C. auris comparing outcomes across the three echinocandins. Majority patients in our study were treated with micafungin. Susceptibility rates were the lowest for caspofungin (35.36% resistance), with no resistance reported for the other two echinocandins. When a susceptible echinocandin was chosen, caspofungin resistance was not a factor significantly associated with mortality. Also, when a susceptible echinocandin was used for therapy, the choice within the class did not affect clinical cure, microbiological cure, or mortality (P > 0.05 for all). Failure to achieve microbiological cure (P = 0.018) and receipt of immune-modulatory therapy (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with increased mortality. Significant cost variation was noted among the echinocandins. Considering the significant cost variation, comparable efficacies can be reassuring for the prescribing physician.

This is the first study comparing efficacy of the three echinocandins in C. auris candidemia. The clinical efficacy of the three echinocandins was found to be comparable. Micafungin and anidulafungin had lower minimum inhibitory concentrations. A significant cost variation was noted.

Comparison of fungemia caused by Candida and non-Candida rare yeasts: a retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital.

Although Candida species are the most common cause of fungemia, non-Candida rare yeasts (NCY) have been increasingly reported worldwide. Although the importance of these yeast infections is recognized, current epidemiological information about these pathogens is limited, and they have variable antifungal susceptibility profiles. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics for fungemia caused by NCY by comparing with candidemia. The episodes of NCY fungemia between January 2011 and August 2023 were retrospectively evaluated in terms of clinical characteristics, predisposing factor, and outcome. In addition, a candidemia group, including patients in the same period was conducted for comparison. Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to the reference method. A total of 85 patients with fungemia episodes were included: 25 with NCY fungemia and 60 with candidemia. Fluconazole had high minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against almost all NCY isolates. The MIC values for voriconazole, posaconazole, and amphotericin B were ≤ 2 µg/ml, and for caspofungin and anidulafungin were ≥ 1 µg/ml against most of isolates. Hematological malignancies, immunosuppressive therapy, neutropenia and prolonged neutropenia, polymicrobial bacteremia/fungemia, preexposure to antifungal drugs, and breakthrough fungemia were associated with NCY fungemia, whereas intensive care unit admission, diabetes mellitus, urinary catheters, and total parenteral nutrition were associated with candidemia. In conclusion, the majority of fungemia due to NCY species was the problem, particularly in hematology units and patients with hematological malignancy. Preexposure to antifungal drugs likely causes a change in the epidemiology of fungemia in favor of non-albicans Candida and/or NCY.

Among all fungemia episodes, hematological malignancies, immunosuppressive therapy, neutropenia, and preexposure to antifungals were risk factors for non-Candida yeast fungemia; diabetes mellitus, urinary catheters, and total parenteral nutrition were risks for candidemia.

COVID-19 associated candidemia: From a shift in fungal epidemiology to a rise in azole drug resistance.

Our understanding of fungal epidemiology and the burden of antifungal drug resistance in COVID-19-associated candidemia (CAC) patients is limited. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective multicenter study in Iran to explore clinical and microbiological profiles of CAC patients. Yeast isolated from blood, were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) using the broth microdilution method M27-A3 protocol. A total of 0.6% of the COVID-19 patients acquired CAC (43/6174). Fluconazole was the most widely used antifungal, and 37% of patients were not treated. Contrary to historic candidemia patients, Candida albicans and C. tropicalis were the most common species. In vitro resistance was high and only noted for azoles; 50%, 20%, and 13.6% of patients were infected with azole-non-susceptible (ANS) C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. albicans isolates, respectively. ERG11 mutations conferring azole resistance were detected for C. parapsilosis isolates (Y132F), recovered from an azole-naïve patient. Our study revealed an unprecedented rise in ANS Candida isolates, including the first C. parapsilosis isolate carrying Y132F, among CAC patients in Iran, which potentially threatens the efficacy of fluconazole, the most widely used drug in our centers. Considering the high mortality rate and 37% of untreated CAC cases, our study underscores the importance of infection control strategies and antifungal stewardship to minimize the emergence of ANS Candida isolates during COVID-19.

Molecular typing and antifungal susceptibility profile of Candida krusei bloodstream isolates from Türkiye.

Candida krusei also known as Pichia kudriavzevii is a potentially multidrug-resistant yeast because it is intrinsically resistant to fluconazole and develops acquired resistance to echinocandins and polyenes. Here, we aim to provide a better understanding of the epidemiology and transmission modes of C. krusei infections by comparing invasive bloodstream (n = 35) and non-invasive vaginal (n = 20) C. krusei isolates. The genetic relatedness of the isolates was assessed using a newly described short tandem repeat (STR) analysis and their sensitivity to eight antifungal compounds was evaluated by antifungal susceptibility testing using the CLSI microbroth dilution method. All C. krusei isolates revealed unique STR genotypes, indicating the absence of clonal transmission in the study group. Furthermore, no drug-resistant or non-wild-type isolates were identified. Our findings demonstrated high resolution of STR genotyping for the detection and simultaneous genetic analysis of multiple C. krusei strains in clinical samples and excellent in vitro activity of common antifungal agents against invasive strains.

Candidemia in Adult Patients in the ICU: A Reappraisal of Susceptibility Testing and Antifungal Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To provide updates on the epidemiology and recommendations for management of candidemia in patients with critical illness. DATA SOURCES: A literature search using the PubMed database (inception to March 2023) was conducted using the search terms "invasive candidiasis," "candidemia," "critically ill," "azoles," "echinocandin," "antifungal agents," "rapid diagnostics," "antifungal susceptibility testing," "therapeutic drug monitoring," "antifungal dosing," "persistent candidemia," and "Candida biofilm." STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical data were limited to those published in the English language. Ongoing trials were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 109 articles were reviewed including 25 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies and 30 studies including patient data, 13 of which were randomized controlled clinical trials. The remaining 54 articles included fungal surveillance data, in vitro studies, review articles, and survey data. The current 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis provides recommendations for selecting empiric and definitive antifungal therapies for candidemia, but data are limited regarding optimized dosing strategies in critically ill patients with dynamic pharmacokinetic changes or persistent candidemia complicated. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Outcomes due to candidemia remain poor despite improved diagnostic platforms, antifungal susceptibility testing, and antifungal therapy selection for candidemia in critically ill patients. Earlier detection and identification of the species causing candidemia combined with recognition of patient-specific factors leading to dosing discrepancies are crucial to improving outcomes in critically ill patients with candidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of candidemia in critically ill patients must account for the incidence of non-albicans Candida species and trends in antifungal resistance as well as overcome the complex pathophysiologic changes to avoid suboptimal antifungal exposure.

Towards the automatic calculation of the EQUAL Candida Score: Extraction of CVC-related information from EMRs of critically ill patients with candidemia in Intensive Care Units.

OBJECTIVES: Candidemia is the most frequent invasive fungal disease and the fourth most frequent bloodstream infection in hospitalized patients. Its optimal management is crucial for improving patients' survival. The quality of candidemia management can be assessed with the EQUAL Candida Score. The objective of this work is to support its automatic calculation by extracting central venous catheter-related information from Italian text in clinical notes of electronic medical records. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample includes 4,787 clinical notes of 108 patients hospitalized between January 2018 to December 2020 in the Intensive Care Units of the IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital in Genoa (Italy). The devised pipeline exploits natural language processing (NLP) to produce numerical representations of clinical notes used as input of machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify CVC presence and removal. It compares the performances of (i) rule-based method, (ii) count-based method together with a ML algorithm, and (iii) a transformers-based model. RESULTS: Results, obtained with three different approaches, were evaluated in terms of weighted F1 Score. The random forest classifier showed the higher performance in both tasks reaching 82.35%. CONCLUSION: The present work constitutes a first step towards the automatic calculation of the EQUAL Candida Score from unstructured daily collected data by combining ML and NLP methods. The automatic calculation of the EQUAL Candida Score could provide crucial real-time feedback on the quality of candidemia management, aimed at further improving patients' health.

Mucositis-associated bloodstream infections in adult haematology patients with fever during neutropenia: risk factors and the impact of mucositis severity.

PURPOSE: Haematology patients with high-risk neutropenia are prone to mucosal-barrier injury-associated laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections (MBI-LCBI). We assessed risk factors for MBI-LCBI including candidaemia in neutropenic haematology patients with fever. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in six dedicated haematology units in the Netherlands. Eligible haematology patients had neutropenia < 500/mL for ≥ 7 days and had fever. MBI-LCBIs were classified according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions and were followed until the end of neutropenia > 500/mL or discharge. RESULTS: We included 416 patients from December 2014 until August 2019. We observed 63 MBI-LCBIs. Neither clinical mucositis scores nor the blood level of citrulline at fever onset was associated with MBI-LCBI. In the multivariable analysis, MASCC-score (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.29 per point decrease), intensive chemotherapy (OR 3·81, 95% CI 2.10 to 6.90) and Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly Candida krusei) colonisation (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.75 to 16.7) were retained as risk factors for MBI-LCBI, while quinolone use seemed protective (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.92). Citrulline level (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.31 per µmol/L decrease), active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 15.4, 95% CI 1.61 to 14.7) and colonisation with fluconazole-resistant Candida (OR 8.54, 95% CI 1.51 to 48.4) were associated with candidaemia. CONCLUSION: In haematology patients with fever during neutropenia, hypocitrullinaemia at fever onset was associated with candidaemia, but not with bacterial MBI-LCBI. Patients with intensive chemotherapy with a low MASCC-score and colonisation with Pichia kudriavzevii had the highest risk of MBI-LCBI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02149329) at 19-NOV-2014.

Natural history and prognostic factors of candidemia in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective, multinational study.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of candidemia in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate mortality, prognostic factors and overall graft loss after candidemia in KTRs. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre study enrolling all KTRs ≥15 years old with candidemia diagnosed at hospitals in Brazil, Spain and Italy from 2010 to 2020. Primary endpoints were mortality rates at 14 and 30 days. Secondary endpoints were prognostic factors of 14-day mortality and overall graft loss. RESULTS: We enrolled 93 KTRs of which 75 were from Brazil. The mean time interval from transplantation to the onset of candidemia was 45.2 ± 61.5 months. 42% of all patients were on haemodialysis, 31.3% had an episode of sepsis and 39% underwent surgery within 30 days before fungemia. European patients were more likely to receive echinocandin (32 vs. 72%, p < .001). 22.7% of Brazilian patients did not receive any antifungal before death. All-cause mortality at 14 days was higher in Brazil (41.3 vs. 11.1%, p = .016). Candida colonisation (OR 6.91 [95% CI: 1.08-44.3], p = .042) and hypotension (OR 4.87 [95% CI: 1.62-14.66], p = .005) were associated with 14-day mortality. Echinocandin treatment had a protective effect (OR 0.19 [95% CI: 0.05-0.73], p = .015). Graft loss at 90 days occurred in 48% of patients (70.7 in Brazil vs. 22.2% in Europe, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Candidemia in KTR is usually documented late after engraftment in patients requiring HD, surgical procedures and dysbiosis secondary to antibiotic use. Mortality was higher in Brazil. Echinocandin therapy was associated with improved survival.

Understanding clinical outcomes and factors influencing mortality in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19-associated candidemia.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID pandemic, research has shown an increase in candidemia cases following severe COVID infection and the identification of risk factors associated with candidemia. However, there is a lack of studies that specifically explore clinical outcomes and mortality rates related to candidemia after COVID infection. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this international study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and identify factors influencing mortality in patients who developed candidemia during their COVID infection. PATIENTS/METHODS: This study included adult patients (18 years of age or older) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and diagnosed with COVID-associated candidemia (CAC). The research was conducted through ID-IRI network and in collaboration with 34 medical centres across 18 countries retrospectively, spanning from the beginning of the COVID pandemic until December 2021. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients diagnosed with CAC were included. The median age of the patients was 67, and 63% of them were male. The most common Candida species detected was C. albicans. The crude 30-day mortality rate was recorded at 62.4%. The logistic regression analysis identified several factors significantly impacting mortality, including age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.07, p < .0005), SOFA score (OR 1.307, 95% CI 1.17-1.45, p < .0005), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 7.95, 95% CI 1.44-43.83, p < .017) and duration of mechanical ventilation (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p < .020). CONCLUSIONS: By recognising these prognostic factors, medical professionals can customise their treatment approaches to offer more targeted care, leading to improved patient outcomes and higher survival rates for individuals with COVID-associated candidemia.

Application of machine learning for mortality prediction in patients with candidemia: Feasibility verification and comparison with clinical severity scores.

BACKGROUND: Clinical severity scores, such as acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), Pitt Bacteremia Score (PBS), and European Confederation of Medical Mycology Quality (EQUAL) score, may not reliably predict candidemia prognosis owing to their prespecified scorings that can limit their adaptability and applicability. OBJECTIVES: Unlike those fixed and prespecified scorings, we aim to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) approach that is able to learn predictive models adaptively from available patient data to increase adaptability and applicability. METHODS: Different ML algorithms follow different design philosophies and consequently, they carry different learning biases. We have designed an ensemble meta-learner based on stacked generalisation to integrate multiple learners as a team to work at its best in a synergy to improve predictive performances. RESULTS: In the multicenter retrospective study, we analysed 512 patients with candidemia from January 2014 to July 2019 and compared a stacked generalisation model (SGM) with APACHE II, SOFA, PBS and EQUAL score to predict the 14-day mortality. The cross-validation results showed that the SGM significantly outperformed APACHE II, SOFA, PBS, and EQUAL score across several metrics, including F1-score (0.68, p < .005), Matthews correlation coefficient (0.54, p < .05 vs. SOFA, p < .005 vs. the others) and the area under the curve (AUC; 0.87, p < .005). In addition, in an independent external test, the model effectively predicted patients' mortality in the external validation cohort, with an AUC of 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: ML models show potential for improving mortality prediction amongst patients with candidemia compared to clinical severity scores.

Fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis complex candidemia and analysis of mutations in the ERG11 gene from Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports of the emergence of fluconazole resistance in Candida parapsilosis species complex poses a challenge, more specifically in settings where echinocandin-based treatment regime is not feasible. OBJECTIVE: This study reported emergence of fluconazole resistance in C. parapsilosis species complex strains isolated from blood cultures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted from 2018 to 2020 at a tertiary care laboratory from Pakistan. Fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis species complex fungemia cases were identified from laboratory database and clinical details were collected. Identification of C. parapsilosis species complex was done using API 20C AUX and Cornmeal Tween80 agar morphology. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using Sensititre YeastONE and interpretation was done with CLSI M60 ED1:2017. ERG11 gene region was amplified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing and analysed by MEGA 11 Software. RESULTS: A total of 13 (8.5%) fluconazole-resistant isolates were identified from 152 C. parapsilosis species complex candidemia cases. Fluconazole MICs of resistant isolates ranged between 8 and 256 µg/mL. Analysis of ERG11 gene revealed nonsynonymous mutations at position Y132F in 86% of the fluconazole-resistant isolates. Diabetes and hospitalization were important risk factors for candidemia with fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis complex. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the emergence and molecular mechanisms of fluconazole resistance in C. parapsilosis species complex from Pakistan. Y132F mutation in the ERG11 gene was the most common mutation in fluconazole-resistant strains. These findings are concerning and necessitate better diagnostics, newer antifungals, ongoing surveillance and further insights on resistance mechanisms in the country.

Factors influencing outcomes in candidemia: A retrospective study of patients in a Swedish county.

BACKGROUND: Candidemia is a diverse condition and associated with a broad spectrum of clinical presentation. As mortality is high, timely diagnosis of candidemia and start of correct therapeutic treatment are essential. OBJECTIVES: To investigate characteristics and factors influencing outcomes for patients with candidemia in a Swedish setting. METHOD: All positive blood cultures for any Candida species in Östergötland County from 2012 to 2016 were screened. Medical records of patients fulfilling all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed to obtain data on risk factors, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and at what wards candidemia was diagnosed. Univariate logistic regression and multivariable regression analysis were used to obtain odds ratio to determine risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality associated with candidemia. A p-value <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of all analysed risk factors, increasing age, renal failure with haemodialysis, immunosuppressant treatment, and severity of the infection (i.e. if septic shock was present) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality in univariate analysis (p < .05). Removal of a central venous catheter or an infectious diseases consultant was associated with a significantly lower odds ratio for death at 30 days (p < .05). With multivariable analysis, age, time to start of treatment and infectious disease consultant remained significant (p < .05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study provides an update of the epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in a Swedish setting, highlighting that patients with candidemia are present at various departments and indicates the importance of an infectious disease consultant when candidemia is present.

Risk factors associated with fluconazole resistance in Candida parapsilosis candidemia: A case-case study.

BACKGROUND: Candida species are among the most important invasive pathogens in intensive care units (ICUs). Non-albicans species including Candida parapsilosis (C. parapsilosis) has increased in recent years. Fluconazole is the leading antifungal agent but resistance is a concern among C. parapsilosis species. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with fluconazole resistance in patients with candidemia due to C. parapsilosis in ICUs. METHODS: This case-case study was conducted in a 750-bed, tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2021. Patients with fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis candidemia constituted the 'cases of interest' group and patients with fluconazole-susceptible C. parapsilosis candidemia constituted the 'comparison cases' group. Demographic and clinical data of the patients were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the backward elimination method to determine the independent predictors of fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis bloodstream infections. RESULTS: The study included 177 patients. In the cultures of these patients, 76 (43%) fluconazole-resistant, 13 (7.3%) fluconazole-reduced susceptible, and 88 (49.7%) fluconazole-susceptible isolates were found. In the regression analysis the risk factors for fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis bloodstream infection, malignancy, immunosuppressive treatment, history of intra-abdominal surgery, hypoalbunemia, previous fluconazole use, and SOFA score were found to be associated in univariate analysis. In multivariate regression analysis, history of intra-abdominal surgery (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.05-4.44), hypoalbuminemia (OR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.06-6.17) and previous fluconazole use (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.02-11) were found to be independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a significant correlation was found between candidemia due to fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis in ICUs and intra-abdominal surgery, hypoalbuminemia, and previous fluconazole use. C. parapsilosis isolates and fluconazole resistance should be continuously monitored, strict infection control measures should be taken and antifungal stewardship programs should be implemented.

Questioning the 14-day dogma in candidemia treatment duration.

The growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global concern. With AMR directly causing 1.27 million deaths in 2019 and projections of up to 10 million annual deaths by 2050, optimising infectious disease treatments is imperative. Prudent antimicrobial use, including treatment duration, can mitigate AMR emergence. This is particularly critical in candidemia, a severe condition with a 45% crude mortality rate, as the 14-day minimum treatment period has not been challenged in randomised comparison. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in August 2023, revealing seven original articles and two case series discussing treatment durations of less than 14 days for candidemia. No interventional trials or prospective observational studies assessing shorter durations were found. Historical studies showed varying candidemia treatment durations, questioning the current 14-day minimum recommendation. Recent research observed no significant survival differences between patients receiving shorter or longer treatment, emphasising the need for evidence-based guidance. Treatment duration reduction post-blood culture clearance could decrease exposure to antifungal drugs, limiting selection pressure, especially in the context of emerging multiresistant Candida species. Candidemia's complexity, emerging resistance and potential for shorter in-hospital stays underscore the urgency of refining treatment strategies. Evidence-driven candidemia treatment durations are imperative to balance efficacy with resistance prevention and ensure the longevity of antifungal therapies. Further research and clinical trials are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for candidemia treatment duration.