Current practice of concomitant surgeries in cartilage repair of the femorotibial compartment of the knee: baseline data of 4968 consecutive patients from the German cartilage registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU).

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of underlying comorbidities is a field of rising interest in cartilage repair surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the current practice of concomitant surgeries in cartilage repair of the knee especially in the medial or lateral femorotibial compartment. Type, frequency and distribution of additional surgeries for correction of malalignment, knee instability and meniscus deficiency should be evaluated. METHODS: Baseline data of 4968 patients of the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) were analyzed regarding the distribution of concomitant surgeries in addition to regenerative cartilage treatment. RESULTS: Beyond 4968 patients 2445 patients with cartilage defects in the femorotibial compartment of the knee could be identified. Of these patients 1230 (50.3%) received additional surgeries for correction of malalignment, instability and meniscus deficiency. Predominant procedures were leg axis corrections (31.3%), partial meniscectomy (20.9%) and ACL reconstruction (13.4%). The distribution of the concomitant surgeries varied between cartilage defects according to the different defect genesis. Patients with traumatic defects were younger (36y) and received predominantly ACL reconstructions (29.2%) (degenerative: 6.7%), whereas patients with degenerative defects were older (43y) and underwent predominantly leg axis corrections (38.0%; traumatic: 11.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the high frequency and distinct distribution of the concomitant surgeries in addition to regenerative cartilage treatment procedures. Understanding of the underlying cause of the cartilage defect and addressing the comorbidities as a whole joint therapy are of utmost importance for a successful regenerative cartilage treatment. These data provide a baseline for further follow up evaluations and long-term outcome analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Treatment of cartilage defects by Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in a sheep model.

Aim of this study was to evaluate effects of Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on repair of articular cartilage defects. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (Lipus) can induce the differentiation and activation of chondrocytes. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of Lipus on articular cartilage defects in a sheep. Eight sheep were divided in to two groups. The animals received bilateraly, articular cartilage defects 4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in deep on the patellar groove and experimental groups were treated with intensity 200 mW/cm2, 20 min/day with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for 2 month. Then both knee joints underwent surgery for remove of formed tissue sample from defects.The samples were evaluated by Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), Safranin-o staining, Immunofluorescence Staining and Morphological characterization. The best and worst sample per group according to Macroscopic and micriscopic scoring were icentified. The results showed that the operated groups with-Lipus-treatment and without-Lipus treatment had considered statistically significant. Gross photography revealed that the defects in experimental groups were filled with proliferative tissue, while in control groups, a thin layer of proliferative tissue was formed in defects. qRT-PCR results showed the expression of coll2, sox9, aggrecan and Osteocalcin in experimental groups. Intense safranin-O staining show the formation cartilage tissue in ultrasound treated group, while loose safranin-o-staining were observed at the control groups. Immunofluorescence staining showed the type 2 Collagen protein expression. We suggest that low-intensity pulsed ultrasound provide the mechanistic basis force for articular cartilage repair and effective treatment modality for improving of articular cartilage defects.

No evidence for combining cartilage treatment and knee osteotomy in osteoarthritic joints: a systematic literature review.

PURPOSE: To assess whether the combination of HTO and cartilage treatment produced an additional clinical benefit compared to HTO alone. The secondary aim was to identify if there was any difference among different cartilage procedures in terms of healing potential and clinical outcome. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed on PubMed database by three independent observers according to the following inclusion criteria: clinical reports of any level of evidence, written in the English language, with no time limitation, about HTO associated with cartilage surgical and injective treatment, including surveys reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look outcomes at any follow-up time. RESULTS: The database search identified 1956 records: 21 studies were included for the final analysis, for a total of 1068 patients; 10 case series and 11 comparative studies. While overall good results were reported in the case series, the analysis of the comparative studies showed less uniform results. Among the eight studies investigating HTO with cartilage surgical procedures, improved tissue regeneration was found in 5/8 studies, whereas a clinical improvement was reported only in two studies. Three studies on HTO combination with injective treatment showed better tissue regeneration and clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Literature presents low-quality studies, with only few heterogeneous comparative papers. While surgical treatments targeting only the cartilage layer did not achieve clinical improvements, injective treatments targeting the overall joint environment showed promising findings. This prompts further research towards the development of treatments able to improve knee osteotomies outcomes. However, until new evidence will prove otherwise, there is no indication for a combined cartilage treatment in routine clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Parylene scaffold for cartilage lesion.

Evaluate parylene scaffold feasibility in cartilage lesion treatment, introducing a novel paradigm combining a reparative and superficial reconstructive procedure. Fifteen rabbits were used. All animals had both knees operated and the same osteochondral lesion model was created bilaterally. The parylene scaffold was implanted in the right knee, and the left knee of the same animal was used as control. The animals were euthanized at different time points after surgery: four animals at three weeks, three animals at six weeks, four animals at nine weeks, and four animals at 12 weeks. Specimens were analyzed by International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) macroscopic evaluation, modified Pineda histologic evaluation of cartilage repair, and collagen II immunostaining. Parylene knees were compared to its matched contra-lateral control knees of the same animal using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank. ICRS mean ± SD values for parylene versus control, three, six, nine and twelve weeks, respectively: 7.83 ± 1.85 versus 4.42 ± 1.08, p = 0.0005; 10.17 ± 1.17 versus 6.83 ± 1.17, p = 0.03; 10.89 ± 0.60 versus 7.33 ± 2.18, p = 0.007; 10.67 ± 0.78 versus 7.83 ± 3.40, p = 0.03. Modified Pineda mean ± SD values for parylene versus control, six, nine and twelve weeks, respectively: 3.37 ± 0.87 versus 6.94 ± 1.7, p < 0.0001; 5.73 ± 2.05 versus 6.41 ± 1.7, p = 0.007; 3.06 ± 1.61 versus 6.52 ± 1.51, p < 0.0001. No inflammation was seen. Parylene implanted knees demonstrated higher collagen II expression via immunostaining in comparison to the control knees. Parylene scaffolds are a feasible option for cartilage lesion treatment and the combination of a reparative to a superficial reconstructive procedure using parylene scaffolds led to better results than the reparative procedure alone.

Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To document the available evidence on the influence of cartilage lesions on the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and their management to optimize the final outcome. METHODS: A systematic review was performed on the PubMed database on articles dealing with cartilage lesions detected at the time of ACL reconstruction, by looking both for their influence on the clinical outcome and the results of their treatment. Reports on clinical, radiological, or second-look outcomes at any follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were preclinical studies, reviews, or studies not reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look outcome after primary ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included for the final analysis. Twenty-seven focused on the influence of cartilage lesions on clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction in 47,837 patients. In total, 21/27 articles showed a correlation with a poorer outcome in terms of subjective, objective, and radiographic findings. Lesion location and depth influenced final results. Only 9.0 % of these defects were treated in the analysed studies, and only 10 manuscripts of overall low level evaluated the results of combined cartilage-ACL treatments. CONCLUSION: The majority of the literature supports the clinical relevance of cartilage lesions which are correlated with a poorer outcome after ACL reconstruction. Nonetheless, a large amount of chondral defects are actually not addressed, also considering the poor evidence for the benefits provided by cartilage treatments. In fact, only a few studies specifically focused on how to manage cartilage lesions found during ACL reconstruction and there is a lack of indications for the most appropriate treatment approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Chondral and osteochondral operative treatment in early osteoarthritis.

In recent years treatment of early osteoarthritis came more and more into focus of orthopaedic research. In particular regenerative therapy options seem to have a high potential to fill the existing treatment gap for patients with early osteoarthritic changes. This article focuses on basic science, recent developments and available clinical data in the important field of operative regeneration procedures for treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects in early degenerative joints. It highlights current knowledge and perspectives of treatment options like microfracture, autologous or allogenous osteochondral transplantations and autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Further the role of biomaterials in a degenerative joint environment is illuminated. First clinical data of regenerative therapy in early osteoarthritis are encouraging to intensify research efforts in this important field. Future treatment perspectives for patients who suffer from early degenerative cartilage changes are discussed.

Cartilage failures. Systematic literature review, critical survey analysis, and definition.

PURPOSE: While midterm results of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) are now available, less attention has been paid to the evaluation of failures of this surgical approach. Aim of this study was to analyse how "failures" are generally defined in cartilage surgery, in order to understand how the survival rate may change according to different definitions of failure. METHODS: A systematic review on MACT in the knee was conducted to report failure rates as well as different failure definitions in the available literature. Afterwards, we analysed the survival curve at 8.5-year follow-up of a survey of 193 patients treated with MACT. Using different definitions to identify failures, we compared how the survival rate changed according to the different definitions of failure. RESULTS: The systematic review on 93 papers showed that the average failure rate reported on 3,289 patients was 5.2 % at a mean 34 months of follow-up. However, 41 studies (44.1 %) did not even consider this aspect, and failures were variously defined, thus generating confusing data that make a meta-analysis or a study comparison meaningless. The failure analysis of the MACT survey showed that the survival curve changed significantly depending on the definition applied; in fact, the failure rate ranged from 3.6 to 33.7 %. According to a critical literature and survey analysis, we proposed a combined surgical- and improvement-based definition which led to a failure rate of 25.9 % at midterm/long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Nowadays, failure definitions of cartilage treatments differ in scientific articles, thus generating confusion and heterogeneous data even when applied to the same cohort of patients. While the literature analysis shows a low number of failures, this study demonstrated that if properly addressed with a comprehensive definition, the real failure rate of cartilage surgical procedures in the knee is higher than previously reported. Recognizing failures would give a better understanding and a more realistic prognosis to patients and physicians seeking treatment for cartilage lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Acute Treatment of Osteochondral Detachment Following Patellar Dislocation: Clinical and Short-Term MRI Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to emphasizes the significance of prompt diagnosis and intervention in younger patients affected by osteochondral detachment after patellar dislocation, where the first objective is to minimize in the shortest possible time complications and ingravescence. The method involves a clinical patient assessment and MRI follow-up in subjects who underwent to an immediate surgical intervention for osteochondral damage. METHODS: From January 2020 to December 2022, 22 patellar dislocation cases were assessed; osteochondral lesions were identified in 12 (54%) patients; nine of these patients were treated immediately with knee arthroscopy, while in seven instances the osteochondral fragment was reattached using bioabsorbable pins. Post-operative clinical evaluations were conducted at one-, three-, and six-month intervals; finally, a six-month post-operative MRI was performed for all surgically treated patients. RESULTS: The MRI evaluations, conducted six months post-operation for all seven patients, indicated successful integration of the reattached osteochondral fragment. Every patient returned to their pre-injury activities after surgery. However, two of them reported mild pain in the anterior region of the knee post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: in young patients, swift diagnosis and immediate surgical intervention for osteochondral detachment resulting from patellar dislocation are crucial. This approach has been identified as the best practice, since it substantially minimizes immediate functional restrictions and significantly lowers the long-term risk of femoral-patellar osteoarthritis.

Post-Adipose-Derived Stem Cells (ADSC) Stimulated by Collagen Type V (Col V) Mitigate the Progression of Osteoarthritic Rabbit Articular Cartilage.

Collagen is essential for cartilage adhesion and formation. In the present study, histology, immunofluorescence, morphometry, and qRT-PCR suggested that adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) stimulated by type V collagen (Col V) induce a significant increase of type II collagen (Col II) in the degenerative area of surgical-induced osteoarthritic rabbit articular cartilage (OA). In vitro, the effects of Col V on the proliferation and differentiation of ADSC were investigated. The expression of the cartilage-related genes Col2a1 and Acan was significantly upregulated and Pou5fl was downregulated post-ADSC/Col V treatment. Post-ADSC/Col V treatment, in vivo analyses revealed that rabbits showed typical signs of osteoarthritic articular cartilage regeneration by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Safranin O/Fast Green staining. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that the volume of Col II fibers and the expression of Col II protein were significantly increased, and apoptosis Fas ligand positive significantly decreased post-ADSC/Col V treatment. In conclusion, the expression of Col II was higher in rabbits with surgical-induced osteoarthritic articular cartilage; hence, ADSC/Col V may be a promising therapeutic target for OA treatment.

Age Is Not a Contraindication for Cartilage Surgery: A Critical Analysis of Standardized Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Age is commonly accepted as a negative prognostic factor in cartilage surgery, and cutoff values of 30 to 40 years have been previously suggested as treatment indication. However, the lower outcome scores documented in older patients do not take in consideration the decreasing requirements of an aging joint. PURPOSE: To analyze the real effect of age in terms of recovery with respect to the functional level expected for different age categories of patients treated for cartilage lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients with International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3-4 defects, involving femoral condyles or trochlea without osteoarthritis, were treated with arthroscopic matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation; 157 patients were evaluated with IKDC subjective and Tegner scores before surgery and then after 2 and 10 years. Results were first evaluated by dividing patients into 2 age groups according to the generally approved cutoff value of 40 years. The analysis was then repeated after the scores of each patient were standardized according to the score achievable per the normative data in healthy patients for the corresponding sex and age category. RESULTS: A significant improvement in all scores was observed. IKDC subjective score improved from 38.9 ± 14.5 to 74.7 ± 21.8 at 10 years. When a cutoff value of 40 years was used, older patients reached a significantly worse IKDC subjective value at 10 years (65.8 ± 24.3 vs 77.2 ± 20.4, P = .007). However, different findings were obtained after the scores were standardized. Although optimal results were still found in younger patients (<30 years), patients older than 40 years also appeared to benefit from the treatment, and no significant differences were noted compared with the younger population. CONCLUSION: The benefit of cartilage treatments in patients with increasing age but without any sign of osteoarthritis was higher than previously reported in literature. In fact, when the decreasing functional level expected by an aging population was considered, standardized results showed an overall benefit after cartilage treatment in patients older than 40 years that was not significantly different from the outcome achieved in younger patients. Thus, age is not a strict contraindication as previously suggested, and future studies should consider standardization of data to prove the real age limit of cartilage treatments.