RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate whether smoking is an independent risk factor for central sensitization syndrome (CSS) in individuals with pain as measured by the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). METHODS: In 2020, we conducted an Internet survey targeting 2000 ordinary residents of Japan (aged 20-69 years) who had pain symptoms from October to November 2020. A multiple regression analysis was performed on the association between smoking status (nonsmokers and current smokers; Brinkman index) and CSI values. Moreover, compared to nonsmokers, the relative risk (RR) of the CSI cut-off score of 40 points or higher among current smokers was calculated using a modified Poisson regression model. Covariates included age, sex, body mass index, marital status, equivalized income, exercise habits, history of hypertension, history of hyperlipidemia, history of diabetes, pain chronicity, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale score. RESULTS: This study analyzed 1,822 individuals (1,041 men and 781 women). Among those experiencing pain, current smoking was associated with the increase in CSI values (ß = 0.07). The Brinkman index was also significantly associated with the increase in CSI values (ß = 0.06). Current smoking also increased the risk of being over the CSI cut-off score, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.29 (95% confidence intervals, 1.04-1.60). Younger age, being women, experiencing chronic pain, and higher pain catastrophizing thinking were also significantly associated with increased CSS severity, independent of smoking status. CONCLUSION: Smoking is an independent risk factor for CSS. This indicates that smoking may be an important factor in the management of central pain disorders.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Neuralgia , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Sensibilização do Sistema Nervoso Central , Estudos Transversais , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologiaRESUMO
While catastrophizing has traditionally been pathologized within psychoanalytic traditions, in this paper I suggest that cataclysmic realities of climate change call upon all of us to cultivate catastrophic thinking. Our new climatic normal demands of us not only new concepts and language, but also a new sort of thinking, building on Wilfred Bion's ideas that to think is to use our mind's capacity to be in touch with internal and external realities. I suggest that sometimes people are able to learn from their experiences of trauma in ways that disrupt the culturally dominant anenvironmental orientation, that is, an orientation that brackets out the more-than-human environment. Instead, they develop a capacity to think catastrophically about and to be permeable to the more-than-human environment. What I call their "traumatized sensibility" can offer guidance as we come to co-exist with and respond more consciously to our hotter planet.
Assuntos
Saúde da População , Psicanálise , Terapia Psicanalítica , Humanos , Planetas , Teoria PsicanalíticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients who present to hand surgery practices are at increased risk of psychological distress, pain, and disability. Greater catastrophic thinking about pain is associated with greater pain intensity, and initial evidence suggest that, together, catastrophic thinking about pain and cognitive fusion (i.e., interpretation of thoughts as true) are associated with poorer pain outcomes. PURPOSE: We tested whether cognitive fusion or catastrophic thinking interacts in relation to pain and upper extremity physical function among patients seeking care from a hand surgeon. METHODS: Patients (N = 110; mean age= 47.51; 59% women) presenting to an outpatient hand surgery practice completed computerized measures of sociodemographics, pain intensity, cognitive fusion, catastrophic thinking about pain, and upper extremity function. RESULTS: ANCOVA revealed an interaction between cognitive fusion and catastrophic thinking about pain with respect to pain intensity and upper extremity function (ps < .01). Participants who scored high on both cognitive fusion and catastrophic thinking about pain reported the greatest levels of pain, relative to those who scored high on a single measure. The lowest levels of upper extremity function were also observed among those who scored high on both catastrophic thinking about pain and cognitive fusion. A similar pattern of results was observed when we tested each catastrophizing subscale individually. CONCLUSION: Maladaptive cognitions about pain (i.e., catastrophic thinking) may be particularly problematic when interpreted as representative of reality (i.e., cognitive fusion). Psychosocial interventions addressing catastrophic thinking about pain and cognitive fusion concurrently merit investigation among people with hand and upper extremity illness.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/psicologia , Catastrofização/fisiopatologia , Dor/fisiopatologia , Pensamento/fisiologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Extremidade Superior/cirurgia , Adulto , Catastrofização/psicologia , Feminino , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Mãos/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/psicologiaRESUMO
Background Catastrophic thinking has been associated with occupational disability in individuals with debilitating pain conditions. The relation between catastrophic thinking and occupational disability has not been previously examined in individuals with debilitating mental health conditions. The present study examined the relation between catastrophic thinking and occupational disability in individuals with major depression. Methods The study sample consisted of 80 work-disabled individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) who were referred to an occupational rehabilitation service. Participants completed measures of depressive symptom severity, catastrophic thinking and occupational disability at admission and termination of a rehabilitation intervention. Return-to-work outcomes were assessed 1 month following the termination of the rehabilitation intervention. Results Cross-sectional analyses of admission data revealed that catastrophic thinking contributed significant variance to the prediction of self-reported occupational disability, beyond the variance accounted for by depressive symptom severity. Prospective analyses revealed that reductions in catastrophic thinking predicted successful return to work following the rehabilitation intervention, beyond the variance accounted for by reductions in depressive symptom severity. Conclusions The findings suggest that catastrophic thinking is a determinant of occupational disability in individuals with major depressive disorder. The findings further suggest that interventions designed to reduce catastrophic thinking might promote occupational re-integration in individuals with debilitating mental health conditions.
Assuntos
Catastrofização/complicações , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/complicações , Retorno ao Trabalho/psicologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto , Catastrofização/prevenção & controle , Catastrofização/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/reabilitação , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Retorno ao Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , AutorrelatoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between the total area marked on pain and numbness diagrams and psychosocial factors (depression, pain catastrophic thinking, and health anxiety). METHODS: A total of 155 patients marked painful and numb areas on separate hand diagrams. Patients also completed demographic, condition-related, and psychosocial (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression Computer Adaptive Test, and Short Health Anxiety Inventory) questionnaires. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine factors associated with total area marked on the pain and numbness diagrams. RESULTS: The total area marked on the pain diagram correlated with catastrophic thinking, symptoms of depression, and health anxiety. In multivariable analysis, catastrophic thinking was the sole predictor of marked pain area, accounting for 10% of variance in the hand pain diagram. The total area marked on the numbness diagram correlated with the interval between onset and visit, diagnosis, catastrophic thinking, and symptoms of depression. In multivariable analysis, the interval between onset and visit, a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, and catastrophic thinking were independently associated with total area marked on the hand numbness diagram. CONCLUSIONS: Catastrophic thinking was independently associated with larger pain and numbness areas on a hand diagram. This suggests that larger symptom markings on hand diagrams may indicate less effective coping strategies. Hand diagrams might be used as a basis for discussion of coping strategies and illness behavior in patients with upper extremity conditions. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/psicologia , Catastrofização/psicologia , Medição da Dor/métodos , Adaptação Psicológica , Ansiedade/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Mãos , Humanos , Hipestesia/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Symptoms are determined in large part by mindsets. Feelings of distress and unhelpful thoughts (misinterpretations) of symptoms account for much of the variability in comfort and capability with the severity of the underlying pathophysiology making a more limited contribution. Incorporating this experimental evidence into the daily practice of hand surgery will help us find ways to develop healthy mindsets, to prioritize the alleviation of distress and the gentle redirection of unhelpful thoughts, to avoid unnecessary surgery, and to provide better psychological and social support for people recovering from injury and surgery.
Assuntos
Mãos , Extremidade Superior , Humanos , Mãos/cirurgiaRESUMO
Introduction: Patients with chronic pain and high-level catastrophic thoughts often do not respond to acupuncture. This may be related to hypofunctioning of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the descending pain inhibitory system. Therefore, we examined the relationship between the level of catastrophic thinking and the analgesic effect of electroacupuncture using the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS). We also evaluated the descending pain inhibitory system using conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and offset analgesia (OA). The relationship between catastrophic thinking and the descending pain inhibitory system was also examined. Materials and Methods: After testing the hospital anxiety and depression scale and the PCS in 14 healthy adults, the current pain threshold (CPT), CPM, and OA were measured, in order, before the intervention. Thereafter, electroacupuncture was applied to 3 limbs (the dominant hand and both lower extremities) at 4 Hz, and to the scalp at 100 Hz, for 30 minutes, and the CPT was measured again immediately after the intervention. The difference in the CPT before and after the intervention was taken as the analgesic effect. Results: The participants were divided into 2 groups, the H-PCS group (≥16 points) and the L-PCS group (≤15 points), according to the PCS score, and the analgesic effects of electroacupuncture were significantly different (P = 0.04). However, no relationship was found between the PCS score and the CPM (r = -0.02, P = 0.94) and OA effects (r = -0.19, P = 0.49). Conclusion: It was suggested that people with high-level catastrophic thinking may find it difficult to obtain the analgesic effects of electroacupuncture.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on improving the level of pain and disability to find out the possible correlation between psychological factors with pain management satisfaction and physical function in patients with femoral neck fractures. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four adult patients with stable femoral neck fractures (type I and II, Garden classification) who underwent internal fixation, were prospectively enrolled including 62 patients in the DEX group and 62 patients in the control group. The magnitude of disability using Harris Hip Score, Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE score), Quality of Recovery (QoR-40), pain-related anxiety (PASS-20), pain management and pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) were recorded on the first and second day after surgery. RESULTS: The DEX group on the first and second days after surgery exhibited higher quality of recovery scores, greater satisfaction with pain management, low disability scores, less catastrophic thinking, lower pain anxiety, greater mini mental state examination scores and less opioid intake and the differences were statistically significant compared with the control group (P<0.001). Emergence agitation and incidence of POCD were significantly less in the DEX group (P<0.001). Decreased disability was associated with less catastrophic thinking and lower pain anxiety, but not associated with more opioid intake (P<0.001). Higher QoR-40 scores had a negative correlation with more catastrophic thinking and more opioid intake (P<0.001). Greater satisfaction with pain management was correlated with less catastrophic thinking and less opioid intake (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Using DEX as an adjunct to anesthesia could significantly improve postoperative cognitive dysfunction and the quality of recovery and these improvements were accompanied by decrease in pain, emergence agitation, and opioid consumption by DEX administration. Since pain relief and decreased disability were not associated with prescribing greater amounts of opioid intake in the patients, improving psychological factors, including reducing catastrophic thinking or self-efficacy about pain, could be a more effective strategy to reduce pain and disability, meanwhile reducing opioid prescription in the patients. Our findings showed that DEX administration is safe sedation with anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antiemetic effects and it could help change pain management strategy from opioidcentric towards improved postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
Assuntos
Dexmedetomidina , Delírio do Despertar , Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Complicações Cognitivas Pós-Operatórias , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Delírio do Despertar/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da DorRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The pain and limitations associated with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee have a notable variation that does not correspond directly with pathophysiology. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of location of the arthritis on pain intensity and magnitude of limitations accounting for personal and psychological factors. METHODS: One hundred and fifty four patients with osteoarthritis of the hip (41 patients) or the knee (113 patients) were enrolled in this prospective cross sectional cohort study. Patients answered questionnaires which included demographics, site of arthritis (hip or knee), laterality (unilateral or bilateral), pain intensity, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS PF CAT), and psychologic questionnaires including the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-4), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-4), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS Dep CAT). Kellgren-Lawrence classification was classified by the treating surgeon. Associations of these factors with pain and function were assessed using bivariate and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: In a multivariable model accounting for potential confounding, magnitude of limitations was independently associated with years of education, work status, time spent exercising, catastrophic thinking (PCS-4), and symptoms of depression. They accounted for 50% of variability in physical function, with the major contributor being catastrophic thinking. The model for pain intensity included time spent exercising and fear of painful movement (TSK-4). Anatomic site and radiographic severity of arthritis were not associated with either physical function or pain in our patient sample. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that limitations and pain from osteoarthritis of the hip and knee are more closely related to personal and psychological factors, less effective cognitive coping strategies such as catastrophic thinking and kinesiophobia in particular, than to pathological and anatomical factors such as location and severity of arthritis. Care that incorporates incremental correction of common misconceptions that accompany the nociception from osteoarthritis have the potential to improve function and comfort in people with osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Symptom Catastrophizing Scale (SCS). The SCS items were drawn from the Pain Catastrophizing Scale but were modified to make them better suited to the context of debilitating mental health conditions that are not necessarily associated with pain. The number of items was reduced from 13 to 7, and the response scale was simplified. METHODS: The SCS was administered to individuals diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (N = 79) or with a chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) condition (N = 88). RESULTS: Exploratory factor analyzes revealed single factor solutions of the SCS for both the MSK and MDD samples. The internal consistency of the SCS was good. The SCS was significantly correlated with measures of pain severity, depressive symptom severity and disability in both samples. Individuals with MDD scored higher on the SCS than individuals with MSK. The SCS was shown to be sensitive to treatment-related reductions in catastrophic thinking. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary analyzes suggest that the SCS is a reliable and valid measure of symptom-related catastrophic thinking associated with debilitating mental health conditions. Implications for Rehabilitation Although catastrophic thinking has been identified as a risk factor for disability, current assessment tools are not well suited for individuals with debilitating mental health conditions. This paper describes a brief assessment instrument that can be used to assess catastrophic thinking in individuals with debilitating mental health conditions. The results of this study suggest that targeting catastrophic thinking might yield reductions in symptom severity and disability in work-disabled individuals with major depressive disorder.
Assuntos
Catastrofização/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/psicologia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , PsicometriaRESUMO
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often report fatigue. However, the reasons for this are poorly understood. In this study of people with IBD, we demonstrate that all-or-nothing behavior (being very active then needing to resting a while) and catastrophic thinking (making very negative assumptions about outcomes) both predict worsening in fatigue over time.
RESUMO
Skills to refrain from catastrophic thinking were negatively related to worry and a wide range of psychological distress. Repetitive negative thinking (including worry) is proposed as a common etiological factor for a wide range of psychological distress. Therefore, reduced repetitive negative thinking would mediate the negative relation between refraining from catastrophic thinking and psychological distress (depression, social anxiety, phobia, generalized anxiety, and obsessions and compulsions). As an overlap between five indices of psychological distress was expected, we first computed latent factors underlying them, which were then predicted by refraining from catastrophic thinking and repetitive negative thinking. Cross-sectional questionnaire data from 125 nonclinical voluntarily participating students (M age = 19.0 years, SD = 3.6; 54% women) supported the predictions: refraining from catastrophic thinking was negatively correlated with depression, social anxiety, phobia, generalized anxiety, and obsession and compulsion. Repetitive negative thinking mediated the negative relationship between refraining from catastrophic thinking and latent factors underlying psychological distress (Fear and Distress). Refraining from catastrophic thinking may be negatively correlated with psychological distress due to its negative relation to repetitive negative thinking.
Assuntos
Catastrofização/epidemiologia , Comportamento Compulsivo/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Comportamento Obsessivo/epidemiologia , Pessimismo , Fobia Social/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Knowledge of factors associated with patient's requests for a second opioid prescription after volar plate fixation of a fracture of the distal radius might inform better pain management protocols and encourage decreased and safer use of opioids. This study tested the primary null hypothesis that there is no difference in demographics, prior opioid prescriptions, injury characteristics, and psychological factors between patients that do and do not receive a second opioid prescription following treatment volar locking plate after distal radius fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data on 206 patients enrolled in one of two prospective studies. Their mean age was 53 years ± SD 15, and 60 (30 %) were men. Forty-seven (23 %) patients received a second opioid prescription. We recorded additional demographics, AO fracture type, American Society for Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, radiographic parameters at the time of injury prior to reduction and after surgery, and catastrophic thinking. RESULTS: Male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.0-4.6, partial pseudo R (2) = 0.018, P = 0.044) and greater dorsal angulation of the articular surface on the lateral post injury radiograph (OR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.96 to 1.0, partial pseudo R (2) = 0.033, P = 0.040) were associated with a second opioid prescription after surgery (pseudo R (2) 0.12, P = 0.0071). CONCLUSIONS: One measure of fracture severity (dorsal displacement) was independently associated with a second opioid prescription, but alone it accounted for 3.3 % of the variation. Other factors such as the patient's expectation prior to surgery, in particular the realization that injury and surgery hurt, might be addressed in future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.
RESUMO
Meditation has a long tradition with substantial implications for many psychotherapies. It has been postulated that meditation may cultivate therapeutic processes similar to various psychotherapies. A previous study used joint factor analysis to identify five common factors of items of scales purported to capture psychological states cultivated by meditation, focusing, and cognitive behavioral therapy, namely, refraining from catastrophic thinking, logical objectivity, self-observation, acceptance, and detached coping. The present study aimed to extend previous research on these five factors by examining their longitudinal relationship to symptoms of depression, obsession and compulsion, and worrying, with two correlational surveys without intervention. Potential mediators of their effect on worrying were also explored. Longitudinal questionnaire studies from two student samples (n = 157 and 232, respectively) found that (a) detached coping was inversely related to obsessive-compulsive symptoms about 5 weeks later; (b) detached coping was inversely related to depressive symptoms about 5 weeks later; (c) refraining from catastrophic thinking was inversely related to worrying, while self-observation was positively related to worrying about 2 months later; and (d) the relation of refraining from catastrophic thinking to worrying was mediated by negative beliefs about worrying, while the relation of self-observation to worrying was mediated by negative beliefs about worrying and monitoring of one's cognitive processes. As refraining from catastrophic thinking involves being detached from one's negative thinking and detached coping involves distancing oneself from external circumstances and problems, the results suggest that distancing attitudes are useful for long-term reduction of various psychological symptoms.
RESUMO
Recent studies have demonstrated that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for children and adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia. Unfortunately, the specific psychological changes that occur during treatment that explain why CBT works are not well understood. Historically, the increased use of specific coping strategies learned during CBT was thought to be the primary reason for why CBT was effective. However, evidence to support the notion that increases in adaptive coping directly lead to patient improvement is minimal. Instead, a growing number of studies in adults suggest that CBT results in more global changes of psychological perceptions of the pain itself (cognitive appraisals) and one's ability to manage the pain. This report discusses the role of coping and aspects of cognitive appraisal as potential psychological changes that explain CBT-related improvements for youths with juvenile fibromyalgia.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Unexpected diagnoses and treatment recommendations can be awkward for both hand specialist and patient. We tested the hypothesis that psychological factors predict an unexpected hand specialist diagnosis after referral from a primary care provider (PCP) for management of an atraumatic hand condition. METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients referred to a hand surgeon by their PCP were asked to complete measures of symptoms of depression, catastrophic thinking, hypochondriacal attitudes and beliefs, and disability prior to the visit. Patients indicated their impression of the diagnosis and treatment recommendations. The hand specialist recorded a diagnosis and treatment recommendations after the visit. RESULTS: Patients receiving unexpected diagnoses had more psychological symptoms than patients receiving expected diagnoses. In logistic regression analysis, symptoms of depression were the sole predictor of an unexpected diagnosis. Patients receiving unexpected treatment recommendations had greater catastrophic thinking and hypochondriacal attitudes and beliefs than patients receiving expected treatment recommendations. In logistic regression analysis, catastrophic thinking was the sole predictor of unexpected treatment recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Given that unexpected hand diagnoses or treatment recommendations are both inherently awkward and associated with greater symptoms of depression, catastrophic thinking, and hypochondriacal beliefs, a practiced, thoughtful, and empathetic communication strategy may improve patient satisfaction and health outcomes.