Mechanisms of compensatory for cervical lordosis changes after laminectomy with fusion.

BACKGROUND: The compensatory mechanisms for cervical lordosis change after laminectomy with fusion was not clear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the compensatory behaviors for cervical lordosis change after laminectomy with fusion. METHODS: This was a retrospective radiological analysis of 43 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent laminectomy with fusion (LCF). The following cervical parameters were measured: C2-7 Cobb angle (C2-7), occiput-C2 angle (O-C2), the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and T1 slope (T1S). The difference was calculated for all angle parameters between the two time points using the following formula: the amount of change (Δ) = (value at the follow-up)-(preoperative value). Non-parametric tests and the t-test were used to compare the difference. The Pearson correlation test was performed, and stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the best correlation between ∆cSVA and ∆T1S. RESULTS: The mean age of 43 patients was 65.51 ± 9.80 years. All patients were classified into two subgroups based on ΔcSVA: Group M (maintained) and, Group I (increased). The preoperative O-C2, C2-7, T1S, and cSVA were similar between Group M and group I (p = 0.950, p = 0.731, p = 0.372, and p = 0.152, respectively). Postoperative O-C2 and postoperative cSVA were significantly different (p = 0.036 and p = 0.004, respectively). ∆O-C2, ∆T1S and ∆cSVA were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.006, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000, respectively). ΔcSVA had significant correlations with ΔO-C2 neutral angle (r = 0.377) and ΔT1S (r = 0.582). A linear regression equation was established: ΔcSVA = 0.602 + 0.103 * ΔT1S (R = 0.582, R2 = 0.339). CONCLUSIONS: The decrease of TIS should be the first and foremost compensation for the loss of lordosis in C2-7 segments after LCF. When the change of T1S alone can not prevent the deterioration of cervical sagittal balance, further increases in the O-C2 segment occur.

Clinical significance of the C2 slope after multilevel cervical spine fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The C2 slope (C2S) is one of the parameters that can determine cervical sagittal alignment, but its clinical significance is relatively unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the C2S after multilevel cervical spine fusion. METHODS: A total of 111 patients who underwent multilevel cervical spine fusion were included in this study. The C2S, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), C2-7 lordosis, and T1 slope (T1S) were measured in standing lateral cervical spine radiographs preoperatively and 2 years after the surgery. Clinical outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score, and patient-reported subjective improvement rate (IR) percentage. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired-samples t-test and Pearson's correlation, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cutoff values of C2S. RESULTS: C2S demonstrated a significant correlation with the cSVA, C2-7 lordosis, T1S, and T1S minus cervical lordosis. C2S revealed a significant correlation with the JOA, neck pain VAS, and NDI scores at 2 years after surgery. Change in the C2S correlated with postoperative neck pain and NDI scores. ROC curves demonstrated the cutoff values of C2S as 18.8°, 22.25°, and 25.35°, according to a cSVA of 40 mm, severe disability expressed by NDI, and severe myelopathy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: C2S can be an additional cervical sagittal alignment parameter that can be a useful prognostic factor after multilevel cervical spine fusion.

The discrepancy between preoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope predisposes inferior clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after cervical laminoplasty.

Objective: Cervical sagittal parameters have been widely used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). This study aims to coin a novel cervical sagittal parameter defined as the ratio of cervical sagittal vertical axis to T1 slope (CSVA/T1S) and to investigate the correlation between CSVA/T1S and postoperative HRQOL after laminoplasty. Methods: A total of 102 CSM patients treated with cervical laminoplasty from our database were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were followed up for >12 months. Radiological parameters were measured using lateral cervical radiographs, including occiput-C2 lordosis (OC2), cervical lordosis (CL), CSVA, and T1S. Clinical parameters included the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and JOA recovery rate. Patients were grouped by preoperative T1S, T1S-CL, and CSVA/T1S value, respectively. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Patients with high CSVA/T1S had greater OC2 and CSVA but lower CL than those in the low CSVA/T1S group pre-and postoperatively. With respect to HRQOL results, the final NDI was 12.46 ± 9.11% in the low CSVA/T1S group, which was significantly lower than that in the high CSVA/T1S group (17.68 ± 8.81%, P = 0.040). Moreover, only CSVA/T1S was detected to be significantly correlated with final NDI (r = 0.310, P = 0.027). No significant correlation was found between clinical results and other cervical sagittal parameters, including T1S, CSVA, and T1S-CL. Conclusions: Preoperative CSVA/T1S was correlated with postoperative NDI in patients with CSM after cervical laminoplasty. Patients with low preoperative CSVA/T1S achieved better neurological function improvement after cervical laminoplasty. Cervical laminoplasty could be an appropriate choice for patients with lower preoperative CSVA/T1S.

The Effect of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis and Lordosis with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) can induce lordosis and improve cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA), but multilevel ACDF may inadvertently increase cervical SVA because of insufficient lordosis induction. METHODS: Patients who underwent 1-, 2-, or ≥3-level ACDF in the subaxial spine with minimum 2-year follow up were retrospectively studied. C2-C7 Cobb angle (lordosis), cervical SVA, and T1 slope were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at last follow-up. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 127 patients. There were no differences in baseline demographics among 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF groups. Mean follow-up was 43.7 months (range, 24-142 months). Increase of cervical SVA immediately postoperatively was 1.94 mm, -1.44 mm, and 7.25 mm for 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF (P = 0.041) and at last follow-up was 2.97 mm, 0.70 mm, and 9.32 mm for 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF (P = 0.026). At last follow-up, 2-level ACDF patients had the greatest decrease in T1 slope (-0.43°) compared with increase of 2.71° for 1-level and 2.84° for ≥3-level patients (P = 0.028). In all 3 groups, segmental (ACDF levels) lordosis, cervical SVA, and T1 slope did not decrease from immediate postoperative to last follow-up. Only 2-level ACDF maintained C2-7 lordosis (2.16°) compared with loss of lordosis in 1-level (-0.84°) and ≥3-level (-2.00°) ACDF (P = 0.008) at last follow-up. Linear regression analysis showed that T1 slope had no relationship with correction of cervical SVA (P = 0.5310) but had a significant correlation with Cobb angle loss of C2-C7 lordosis (P = 0.0016). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 1- and 2-level ACDF, ≥3-level ACDF resulted in significant increase of cervical SVA and loss of overall lordosis. Compared with 1- and ≥3-level ACDF, 2-level ACDF had the greatest ability to maintain lordosis. T1 slope had a significant correlation with loss of C2-C7 lordosis after ACDF.

Accuracy and Reliability of X-ray Measurements in the Cervical Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which compared artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. PURPOSE: Useful radiographic parameters for assessing cervical alignment include the Cobb angles, T1 slope (T1S), occipitocervical inclination (OCI), K-line tilt (KLT), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). This study aimed to determine measurement accuracy and reliability for these parameters. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Various authors have assessed repeatability by comparing different methods of measurement, but knowledge of measurement error and minimal detectable change is scarce. METHODS: We evaluated 758 lateral cervical radiographs. One medical student and one spine surgeon (i.e., measured ×2 within 4 weeks) independently measured the parameters obtaining 5,850 values. Standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each parameter. The accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle measurements were calculated for the different types of angles: cervical lordosis, prosthesis angle, segmental angle with two bone surfaces (SABB), and segmental angle with one bone and one metal surface. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: SEm was 1.8° and MDC was 5.0° for the Cobb angle, with an intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.958/0.886. All the different subtypes of Cobb angles had an ICC higher than 0.950, except SABB (intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.922/0.716). The most accurate and reliable measurement was for KLT. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normative data on SEm and MDC for Cobb angles, T1S, KLT, OCI, and cSVA in cervical lateral radiographs. Reliability was excellent for all parameters except SABB (e.g., good).

The Sagittal Balance of the Cervical Spine: Radiographic Analysis of Interdependence between the Occipitocervical and Spinopelvic Alignment.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective clinical study. PURPOSE: Previous studies have indicated that cervical lordosis is a parameter influenced by segmental and global spinal sagittal balance parameters. However, this correlation still remains unclear. Therefore, a better understanding of the normal values and interdependencies between inter-segmental alignment parameters is needed. This is a preliminary analysis that helps to understand these factors. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Change in global sagittal alignment is associated with poor health-related quality of life. Questions regarding which parameters play the primary roles in the progression of spinal sagittal imbalance and which might be compensatory factors remain unanswered. METHODS: Prospectively, 420 adults (105 asymptomatic, 105 cervical symptomatic, 105 lumbar symptomatic, and 105 post-surgical) were selected. Whole-spine standing lateral radiographs were taken, and spinopelvic, thoracic, and cervical parameters were measured. Then, the data were analyzed using correlation coefficient test and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: All the parameters showed a normal distribution. The mean values of the cervical parameters are as follows: C1C2 Cobb angle, -27.07°±4.3°; C2C7 Cobb angle, -16.4°±5.6°; OCC2 Cobb angle, -14.5°±3.8°; OCC7 Cobb angle, -29.8°±5.6°; C2C7 Harrison angle, 20.4°±4.3°; and C7 slope, -25.4°±5.6°. The analysis of these parameters revealed no statistically significant difference between asymptomatic, symptomatic, and post-surgical patients. C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correlated with the C2C7 Cobb angle (r =0.7) in all groups. No significant correlation was noted between cervical and spinopelvic parameters in asymptomatic patients. However, C1C2 Cobb angle correlated significantly with pelvic incidence (PI, r =-0.2), lumbar lordosis (LL, r =0.2), and pelvic tilt (PT, r =-0.2) in cervical symptomatic patients. Irrespective of the patient symptom sub-group (n=420), C1C2 Cobb angle correlated with LL (r =0.1) and C2C7 Harrison angle correlated with PI and PT (r =0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate significant interdependence between the spinopelvic and cervical alignment, especially in cervical symptomatic patients. In addition, strong correlation was found between the C7 SVA and C2C7 Cobb angle. Overall, the results of this study could help to better understand the cervical sagittal alignment and serve as preliminary data for planning surgical reconstruction procedures.

Neutral cervical sagittal vertical axis and cervical lordosis vary with T1 tilt.

OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a study to determine whether a change in T1 tilt results in a compensatory change in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in a cadaveric spine model. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadavers (occiput [C0]-T1) were cleaned of soft tissue and mounted on a customized test apparatus. A 5-kg mass was applied to simulate head weight. Infrared fiducials were used to track segmental motion. The occiput was constrained to maintain horizontal gaze, and the mounting platform was angled to change T1 tilt. The SVA was altered by translating the upper (occipital) platform in the anterior-posterior plane. Neutral SVA was defined by the lowest flexion-extension moment at T1 and recorded for each T1 tilt. Lordosis was measured at C0-C2, C2-7, and C0-C7. RESULTS: Neutral SVA was positively correlated with T1 tilt in all specimens. After increasing T1 tilt by a mean of 8.3° ± 2.2°, neutral SVA increased by 27.3 ± 18.6 mm. When T1 tilt was reduced by 6.7° ± 1.4°, neutral SVA decreased by a mean of 26.1 ± 17.6 mm.When T1 tilt was increased, overall (C0-C7) lordosis at the neutral SVA increased from 23.1° ± 2.6° to 32.2° ± 4.4° (p < 0.01). When the T1 tilt decreased, C0-C7 lordosis at the neutral SVA decreased to 15.6° ± 3.1° (p < 0.01). C0-C2 lordosis increased from 12.9° ± 9.3° to 29.1° ± 5.0° with increased T1 tilt and decreased to -4.3° ± 6.8° with decreased T1 tilt (p = 0.047 and p = 0.041, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Neutral SVA is not a fixed property but, rather, is positively correlated with T1 tilt in all specimens. Overall lordosis and C0-C2 lordosis increased when T1 tilt was increased from baseline, and vice versa.

Comparison of perioperative complications following posterior column osteotomy versus posterior-based 3-column osteotomy for correction of rigid cervicothoracic deformity: a single-surgeon series of 95 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: The correction of severe cervicothoracic sagittal deformities can be very challenging and can be associated with significant morbidity. Often, soft-tissue releases and osteotomies are warranted to achieve the desired correction. There is a paucity of studies that examine the difference in morbidity and complication profiles for Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO) versus 3-column osteotomy (3CO) for cervical deformity correction. METHODS: A retrospective comparison of complication profiles between posterior-based SPO (Ames grade 2 SPO) and 3CO (Ames grade 5 opening wedge osteotomy and Ames grade 6 closing wedge osteotomy) was performed by examining a single-surgeon experience from 2011 to 2018. Patients of interest were individuals who had a cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4 cm and/or cervical kyphosis > 20° and who underwent corrective surgery for cervical deformity. Multivariate analysis was utilized. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included: 49 who underwent 3CO and 46 who underwent SPO. Twelve of the SPO patients underwent an anterior release procedure. The patients' mean age was 63.2 years, and 60.0% of the patients were female. All preoperative radiographic parameters showed significant correction postoperatively: cSVA (6.2 cm vs 4.5 cm [preoperative vs postoperative values], p < 0.001), cervical lordosis (6.8° [kyphosis] vs -7.5°, p < 0.001), and T1 slope (40.9° and 35.2°, p = 0.026). The overall complication rate was 37.9%, and postoperative neurological deficits were seen in 16.8% of patients. The surgical and medical complication rates were 17.9% and 23.2%, respectively. Overall, complication rates were higher in patients who underwent 3CO compared to those who underwent SPO, but this was not statistically significant (total complication rate 42.9% vs 32.6%, p = 0.304; surgical complication rate 18.4% vs 10.9%, p = 0.303; and new neurological deficit rate 20.4% vs 13.0%, p = 0.338). Medical complication rates were similar between the two groups (22.4% [3CO] vs 23.9% [SPO], p = 0.866). Independent risk factors for surgical complications included male sex (OR 10.88, p = 0.014), cSVA > 8 cm (OR 10.36, p = 0.037), and kyphosis > 20° (OR 9.48, p = 0.005). Combined anterior-posterior surgery was independently associated with higher odds of medical complications (OR 10.30, p = 0.011), and preoperative kyphosis > 20° was an independent risk factor for neurological deficits (OR 2.08, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in complication rates between 3CO and SPO for cervicothoracic deformity correction, but absolute surgical and neurological complication rates for 3CO were higher. A preoperative cSVA > 8 cm was a risk factor for surgical complications, and kyphosis > 20° was a risk factor for both surgical and neurological complications. Additional studies are warranted on this topic.

How does the cervical spine respond to hyperkyphosis correction in Scheuermann's disease?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the response of the cervical spine to the surgical correction of Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK) and to postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (mean age 14.6 ± 2.3 years) were enrolled in the study: 35 patients in a thoracic SK (T-SK) group and 24 in a thoracolumbar SK (TL-SK) group. The mean follow-up period was 47.2 ± 17.6 months. Radiographic data, PJK-related complications, and patient-reported outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: The global kyphosis significantly decreased postoperatively, and similar correction rates were observed between the two groups (mean 47.1% ± 8.6% [T-SK] vs 45.8% ± 9.4% [TL-SK], p = 0.585). The cervical lordosis (CL) in the T-SK group notably decreased from 21.4° ± 13.3° to 13.1° ± 12.4° after surgery and was maintained at 14.9° ± 10.7° at the latest follow-up, whereas in the TL-SK group, CL considerably increased from 7.2° ± 10.7° to 11.7° ± 11.1° after surgery and to 13.8° ± 8.9° at the latest follow-up. PJK was identified in 16 patients (27.1%). Its incidence in the TL-SK group was notably higher than it was in the T-SK group (41.6% [n = 10] vs 17.1% [n = 6], p = 0.037). Compared with non-PJK patients, PJK patients had greater CL and lower pain scores on the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperkyphosis correction eventually resulted in reciprocal changes in the cervical spine, with CL notably decreased in the T-SK group but significantly increased in the TL-SK group. Patients developing PJK have increased CL, which seems to have a negative effect on patients' health-related quality of life.

The morphology of cervical deformities: a two-step cluster analysis to identify cervical deformity patterns.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical deformity (CD) is difficult to define due to the high variability in normal cervical alignment based on postural- and thoracolumbar-driven changes to cervical alignment. The purpose of this study was to identify whether patterns of sagittal deformity could be established based on neutral and dynamic alignment, as shown on radiographs. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter database of CD patients who underwent surgery from 2013 to 2015. Their radiographs were reviewed by 12 individuals using a consensus-based method to identify severe sagittal CD. Radiographic parameters correlating with health-related quality of life were introduced in a two-step cluster analysis (a combination of hierarchical cluster and k-means cluster) to identify patterns of sagittal deformity. A comparison of lateral and lateral extension radiographs between clusters was performed using an ANOVA in a post hoc analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 75 patients were identified as having severe CD due to sagittal malalignment, and they formed the basis of this study. Their mean age was 64 years, their body mass index was 29 kg/m2, and 66% were female. There were significant correlations between focal alignment/flexibility of maximum kyphosis, cervical lordosis, and thoracic slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL) flexibility (r = 0.27, 0.31, and -0.36, respectively). Cluster analysis revealed 3 distinct groups based on alignment and flexibility. Group 1 (a pattern involving a flat neck with lack of compensation) had a large TS-CL mismatch despite flexibility in cervical lordosis; group 2 (a pattern involving focal deformity) had focal kyphosis between 2 adjacent levels but no large regional cervical kyphosis under the setting of a low T1 slope (T1S); and group 3 (a pattern involving a cervicothoracic deformity) had a very large T1S with a compensatory hyperlordosis of the cervical spine. CONCLUSIONS: Three distinct patterns of CD were identified in this cohort: flat neck, focal deformity, and cervicothoracic deformity. One key element to understanding the difference between these groups was the alignment seen on extension radiographs. This information is a first step in developing a classification system that can guide the surgical treatment for CD and the choice of fusion level.

Small C7-T1 lordotic angle and muscle degeneration at C7 level were independent radiological characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) of ≥40 mm is recognized as the key factor of poor health-related quality of life, poor surgical outcomes, and correction loss after surgery for cervical deformity. However, little is known about the radiological characteristics of patients with cSVA≥40 mm. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the radiological characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of weight-bearing cervical magnetic resonance (MR) images. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive 1,500 MR images of symptomatic patients in weight-bearing position. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical sagittal vertical axis, cervical alignment, cervical balance parameters (T1 slope, Co-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, C7-T1 angle, neck tilt, and thoracic inlet angle), disc degeneration (Pfirmann and Suzuki classification), end plate degeneration (Modic change), spondylolisthesis (antero- and retrolisthesis), anteroposterior (AP) diameter of dural sac, cross-sectional area (CSA), and fat infiltration ratio of the transversospinalis muscles at C4 and C7 levels. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups: cSVA≥40 mm and cSVA<40 mm. Gender, age, and cervical alignment were analyzed. Subsequently, matched imbalance (cSVA≥40 mm) and control (<40 mm) groups were created using the propensity score to adjust for age, gender, and cervical alignment. Cervicothoracic angular parameters, disc degeneration, Modic change, spondylolisthesis, and degeneration of the transversospinalis muscles at C4 and C7 were compared. Variables with p<.05 were included in the multinomial logistic regression model to identify factors that relate to the cervical balance grouping. RESULTS: The incidence of patients with cervical imbalance was 2.5% (37 patients). Those patients had a higher incidence of kyphosis, were older, and there were more male patients. In the matched imbalance group, the T1 slope was greater (p=.028), C7-T1 lordotic angle was smaller (p<.001), the number of anterolisthesis was greater (p=.012), and the fat infiltration ratio at C4 and C7 was higher (p=.023, 0.030) compared with the control. Logistic regression analysis showed that the C7-T1 angle (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.592, p=.001) and fat infiltration ratio at C7 level (aOR=1.178, p=.030) were significant independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller C7-T1 lordotic angle and severe muscle degeneration at C7 level were independent characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance.

Characteristics of Cervical Sagittal Alignment at Different C0-C2 Correcting Angles in Fusion Treatment of Atlantoaxial Dislocations.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the appropriate range of C0-C2 correction angles by analyzing cervical sagittal alignment parameters and evaluating clinical outcomes. METHODS: The preoperative and postoperative radiographs, visual analogue scale, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and neck disability index of 65 atlantoaxial dislocation patients were retrospectively collected. The C0-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) were measured from the radiographs, and an assessment of cervical degenerative disc disease was made. According to the 2-year postoperative C0-C2 angles, all patients were categorized into a <10° subgroup, 10°-20° subgroup, and >20° subgroups. RESULTS: The postoperative C2-C7 angles and cSVA of the 10°-20° subgroup were significantly different from those of the <10° subgroup. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score of the 10°-20° subgroup was significantly different from those of the <10° and >20° subgroups. All patients (26/26) in the 10°-20° subgroup exhibited a cSVA 0-40 mm, 25% of patients (6/24) in the >20° subgroup exhibited a cSVA >40 mm, and 40% of patients (6/15) in the <10° subgroup showed a cSVA <0 mm. The postoperative incidence of cervical degenerative disc disease did not increase in the 10°-20° subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Atlantoaxial dislocation patients with different C0-C2 postoperative angles had different cervical sagittal alignments and clinical outcomes. In our study, the patients within the C0-C2 10°-20° subgroup exhibited superior clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment.

Factors Associated with Neck and Shoulder Pain in Volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of the present study were 1) to examine the association between neck and shoulder pain (NSP) and lifestyle in the general population and 2) to examine if sagittal spino-pelvic malalignment is more prevalent in NSP. METHODS: A total of 107 volunteers (mean age, 64.5 years) were recruited in this study from listings of resident registrations in Kihoku region, Wakayama, Japan. Feeling pain or stiffness in the neck or shoulders was defined as an NSP. The items studied were: 1) the existence or lack of NSP and their severity (using VAS scale), 2) Short Form-36 (SF-36), 3) Self-Rating Questionnaire for Depression (SRQ-D), 4) Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), 5) a detailed history consisting of 5 domains as being relevant to the psychosocial situation of patients with chronic pain, 6) A VAS of pain and numbness to the arm, and from thoracic region to legs. The radiographic parameters evaluated were also measured. Participants with a VAS score of 40 mm or higher and less were divided into 2 groups. Association of SF-36, SRQ-D, and PCS with NSP were assessed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: In terms of QoL, psychological assessment and a detailed history, bodily pain in SF-36, SRQ-D, and family stress were significantly associated with NSP. A VAS of pain and numbness to the arm, and from thoracic region to legs, was significantly associated with NSP. There were no statistical correlations between the VAS and radiographic parameters of the cervical spine. Among the whole spine sagittal measurements, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were significantly associated with NSP. CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed the factors associated with NSP. Large SS and reduced SVA were significantly associated with NSP, while cervical spine measurements were not.

The effect of C2-3 disc angle on postoperative adverse events in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVEComplete radiographic and clinical evaluations are essential in the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Prior studies have correlated cervical sagittal imbalance and kyphosis with disability and worse health-related quality of life. However, little is known about C2-3 disc angle and its correlation with postoperative outcomes. The present study is the first to consider C2-3 disc angle as an additional radiographic predictor of postoperative adverse events.METHODSA retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with CSM who underwent surgeries from 2010 to 2014. Data collected included demographics, baseline presenting factors, and postoperative outcomes. Cervical sagittal alignment variables were measured using the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Univariable logistic regression analyses were used to explore the association between dependent and independent variables, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created using stepwise variable selection.RESULTSThe authors identified 171 patients who had complete preoperative and postoperative radiographic and outcomes data. The overall rate of postoperative adverse events was 33% (57/171), and postoperative C2-3 disc angle, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and C2-7 Cobb angle were found to be significantly associated with adverse events. Inclusion of postoperative C2-3 disc angle in the analysis led to the best prediction of adverse events. The mean postoperative C2-3 disc angle for patients with any postoperative adverse event was 32.3° ± 17.2°, and the mean for those without any adverse event was 22.4° ± 11.1° (p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSIn the present retrospective analysis of postoperative adverse events in patients with CSM, the authors found a significant association between C2-3 disc angle and postoperative adverse events. They propose that C2-3 disc angle be used as an additional parameter of cervical spinal sagittal alignment and predictor for operative outcomes.

Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients.

OBJECTIVE: A high prevalence of cervical deformity (CD) has been identified among adult patients with thoracolumbar spinal deformity undergoing surgical treatment. The clinical impact of this is uncertain. This study aimed to quantify the differences in patient-reported outcomes among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) based on presence of CD prior to treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of a multicenter prospective database of patients with ASD who underwent surgical treatment with 2-year follow-up. Patients were grouped by the presence of preoperative CD: 1) cervical positive sagittal malalignment (CPSM) C2-7 sagittal vertical axis ≥ 4 cm; 2) cervical kyphosis (CK) C2-7 angle > 0; 3) CPSM and CK (BOTH); and 4) no baseline CD (NONE). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores included the Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22), and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of these scores at 2 years. Standard radiographic measurements were conducted for cervical, thoracic, and thoracolumbar parameters. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two patients were included in this study: CPSM, 45; CK, 37; BOTH, 16; and NONE, 84. Patients with preoperative CD and those without had similar baseline thoracolumbar radiographic measurements and similar correction rates at 2 years. Patients with and without preoperative CD had similar baseline HRQOL and on average both groups experienced some HRQOL improvement. However, those with preoperative CPSM had significantly worse postoperative ODI, PCS, SRS-22 Activity, SRS-22 Appearance, SRS-22 Pain, SRS-22 Satisfaction, and SRS-22 Total score, and were less likely to meet MCID for ODI, PCS, SRS-22 Activity, and SRS-22 Pain scores with the following ORs and 95% CIs: ODI 0.19 (0.07-0.58), PCS 0.17 (0.06-0.47), SRS-22 Activity 0.23 (0.09-0.62), SRS-22 Pain 0.20 (0.08-0.53), and SRS-22 Appearance 0.34 (0.12-0.94). Preoperative CK did not have an effect on outcomes. Interestingly, despite correction of the thoracolumbar deformity, 53.3% and 51.4% of patients had persistent CPSM and persistent CK, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with thoracolumbar deformity without preoperative CD are likely to have greater improvements in HRQOL after surgery than patients with concomitant preoperative CD. Cervical positive sagittal alignment in adult patients with thoracolumbar deformity is strongly associated with inferior outcomes and failure to reach MCID at 2-year follow-up despite having similar baseline HRQOL to patients without CD. This was the first study to assess the impact of concomitant preoperative cervical malalignment in adult patients with thoracolumbar deformity. These results can help surgeons educate patients at risk for inferior outcomes and direct future research to identify an etiology and improve patient outcomes. Investigation into the etiology of the baseline cervical malalignment may be warranted in patients who present with thoracolumbar deformity.