Indication Criteria of Hysteroscopic Surgery for Secondary Infertility due to Symptomatic Cesarean Scar Defect Based on Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Hysteroscopic surgery criteria for patients with cesarean scar defect (CSD) are unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the indication of hysteroscopic surgery for secondary infertility owing to CSD. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single university hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients with secondary infertility owing to symptomatic CSD who underwent hysteroscopic surgery under laparoscopy between July 2014 and February 2022 were included. INTERVENTIONS: Clinical data, including basic patient information, preoperative residual myometrial thickness (RMT), and postoperative pregnancy status, were collected from medical records. Patients were divided into postoperative pregnancy and nonpregnancy groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the optimal cutoff value was calculated based on the area under the curve to predict pregnancy after hysteroscopic surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No complications were observed in any cases. Among the 70 patients, 49 patients (70%) became pregnant after hysteroscopic surgery. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the pregnancy and nonpregnancy groups. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for patients aged <38 years, the value of the area under the curve was 0.77 (sensitivity, 0.83; specificity, 0.78) when optimal cutoff of RMT was 2.2 mm. There was a significant difference in preoperative RMT between the pregnancy and nonpregnancy groups (3.3 mm and 1.7 mm, respectively) in patients aged <38 years. CONCLUSION: For RMT ≥2.2 mm, hysteroscopic surgery was reasonable for secondary infertility owing to symptomatic CSD, particularly in patients aged <38 years.

Association between deficient cesarean delivery scar and cesarean scar syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to compare long-term morbidity after elective and emergency cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 200 women delivered by CD. Ultrasound examinations were performed transvaginally at 6 weeks and 18 months after CD. Clinical data were collected at the time of CD and after 18 months. RESULTS: In the group of 200 women, 29% underwent emergency and 71% elective CD. Then, 6 weeks and 18 months after CD, a severe scar defect was present in 7% and 5%, respectively (P = .4). After 18 months of CD, 17% (34/200) of women had evidence of adhesions of the vesicouterine pouch. Severe CD scar defects were significant predictors for adhesion formation in vesicouterine pouch (OR 3.14, 95% CI, 1.54-4.74), pelvic pain (OR 1.68, 95% CI, 0.22-3.14), dysmenorrhea (OR 2.12, 95% CI, 0.74-3.50), and dyspareunia (OR 1.38, 95% CI, 0.09-2.67). Uterine scar defects detected at 6 weeks after elective CD were detectable at 18 months in only 40% of cases, whereas uterine scar defects after emergency CD were still detectable in 87% of cases. CONCLUSION: Uterine scar defects are more frequent at 18 weeks after emergency CD, than after elective CD (40% vs 87%). Women with severe scar defects have higher risk of adhesion formation, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain.

Impact of hysteroscopic surgery for isthmocele associated with cesarean scar syndrome.

AIM: Cesarean scar syndrome (CSS) is characterized by increased risk of postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and infertility, due to a post-cesarean scar defect known as an isthmocele. This study aimed to assess the impact of hysteroscopic surgery on isthmocele associated with CSS. METHODS: Eighteen patients with CSS were enrolled. Surgical methods included resection of the inferior edge and superficial cauterization of the isthmocele via hysteroscopic surgery. We evaluated the residual myometrial thickness and isthmocele volume using magnetic resonance imaging, before and after hysteroscopic surgery. RESULTS: All patients underwent surgery without any complications. The residual myometrium was thicker after hysteroscopic surgery (median: 2.1 mm and 4.2 mm, before and after surgery, respectively; P = 0.0001). Isthmocele volume was significantly reduced after hysteroscopic surgery (median: 494.9 mm3 and 282.8 mm3 , before and after surgery, respectively; P = 0.0016). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that hysteroscopic surgery is effective in increasing the residual myometrial thickness and reducing the size of isthmocele.

Management of secondary infertility following cesarean section: Report from the Subcommittee of the Reproductive Endocrinology Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the current status and management of secondary infertility following cesarean section in Japan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A two-step questionnaire survey was performed in 1092 facilities, including teaching hospitals and artificial reproductive technology clinics, registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. In our questionnaires, we obtained data about symptoms, clinical findings, diagnostic methods, and pregnancy outcomes. Treatments were sorted into three groups, namely typical infertility treatment (group A), conservative treatment (group B), and operative treatment (group C). RESULTS: Of the 1092 facilities, 616 (56%) sent back reply forms to the first questionnaire; 56 (32%) of 176 facilities answered the second questionnaire, and 189 cases were able to be analyzed after completion of the two questionnaires. The commonest symptom was abnormal uterine bleeding during the follicular phase (91 cases; 48% of the 189 eligible cases), and the commonest clinical finding was fluid pooling in the area of cesarean scar dehiscence during the ovulatory phase (142 cases; 75%). The most commonly used diagnostic method was transvaginal ultrasound (153 cases, 81%). The pregnancy rate was 33% in group A, 50% in group B, and 60% in group C. In patients with abnormal uterine bleeding, painful symptoms and fluid pooling at the cesarean scar dehiscence, the pregnancy rate was significantly higher in group C (64%) than in group A (16%; P = 0.0063). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend operative treatment for secondary infertility following cesarean section with painful symptoms and fluid pooling at the site of cesarean scar dehiscence.

New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by post-cesarean scar defect (PCSD). Our investigation focused on the validity of new diagnostic criteria and selection methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects were 22 women with secondary infertility due to PCSD with retention of bloody fluid in the uterine cavity. Women with a residual myometrial thickness of ≥ 2.5 mm and an anteflexed or straight uterus underwent hysteroscopic surgery, while all others underwent laparoscopic repair. Hysteroscopic surgery involved resection and coagulation of scarred areas, whereas laparoscopic surgery involved removal of scarred areas combined with hysteroscopy, followed by resuturing. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 22 women (63.6%) who were followed up for ≥ 1 year after surgery achieved pregnancy. Pregnancies occurred in all four women (100%) who underwent hysteroscopic surgery and in 10 of the 18 women (55.6%) who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Three out of four women who underwent hysteroscopic surgery had term deliveries. Among the women who underwent laparoscopic surgery, five had term deliveries. No cases of uterine rupture were experienced, and the delivery method was cesarean section in all cases. CONCLUSION: We propose that infertility associated with PCSD, cesarean scar syndrome, is caused by the retention of bloody fluid in the uterine cavity and scarring. Endoscopic treatment, such as hysteroscopy or laparoscopy, was effective for cesarean scar syndrome.

Barbed vs conventional sutures for cesarean uterine scar defects: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of barbed sutures in preventing myometrial defects and enhancing postpartum outcomes after cesarean section (C-section) is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study compared clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of uterine scar defects after C-section with barbed and conventional smooth thread sutures. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Four obstetrics and gynecology departments across three Japanese healthcare regions were included. The participants were women requiring their first cesarean delivery between May 2020 and March 2023. Of the 1211 participants enrolled, 298 underwent C-section and 253 were followed up until July 2023. Participants with singleton pregnancies were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either conventional or spiral thread sutures with a double-layer continuous suture. The study period comprised the time of consent to the 6- to 7-month examination. The primary endpoint was the rate of scar niches >2 mm evaluated using transvaginal ultrasonography at 6 to 7 months after surgery. Additional metrics included the total operative time, suture application time, operative blood loss, number of additional sutures required for hemostasis, maternal surgical complications, postoperative infections, surgeon's years of experience, and individual subscale scores. RESULTS: All data of the 220 participants (barbed suture group: 110; conventional suture group: 110) were available, thus enabling a full analysis set. A comparison of the barbed and conventional suture groups, respectively, revealed the following: niche length, 2.45±1.65 mm (range: 1.0-6.7) vs 3.79±1.84 mm (range: 1.0-11.0) (P<.001); niche depth, 1.78±1.07 mm (range: 1.0-5.7) vs 2.70±1.34 mm (range: 1.0-7.3) (P<.001); residual myometrial thickness (RMT), 8.46±1.74 mm (range: 4.8-13.0) vs 7.07±2.186 mm (range: 2.2-16.2) (P<.001); and niche width, 1.58±2.73 mm (range: 0.0-14.0) vs 2.88±2.36 mm (range: 0.0-11.0) (P<.001), respectively. The barbed suture group exhibited no defects and an RMT <3 mm. Furthermore, the barbed suture group had a lower rate of uterine niches (29.1%; n=32/110) than the conventional suture group (68.2%; n=75/110). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in operative times, maternal surgical complications, or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Double-layer barbed sutures during cesarean delivery may prevent C-section scar defects and postoperative complications. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

A Trimming Technique: A Case Report of a Novel Surgical Approach for Cesarean Scar Dehiscence During Cesarean Section.

Cesarean section can lead to residual myometrial thickness thinning and cesarean scar syndrome. We report a novel trimming technique for residual myometrial thickness recovery in women with cesarean scar syndrome. Case 1: A 33-year-old woman who developed cesarean scar syndrome (CSS) and abnormal uterine bleeding post-cesarean scar became pregnant following hysteroscopic treatment. The myometrium at previous scar was dehiscent; therefore, a transverse incision was made above the scar. Post-operative uterine recovery failed owing to lochia retention, and developed cesarean scar syndrome again. Case 2: A 29-year-old woman who developed cesarean scar syndrome post-cesarean section became pregnant spontaneously. The myometrium at the previous scar was dehiscent like case 1. Scar repair was performed using a trimming technique during cesarean section; there were no subsequent complications and she conceived again spontaneously. Performing this novel surgical procedure during cesarean section may contribute to residual myometrial thickness recovery in women with cesarean scar syndrome.