Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(7): e7142, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the use of steroids as antiemetics in clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy. METHODS: Focusing on phase III trials registered before August 2023, it evaluated the consistency of steroid use guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 3452 trials screened, 44 were selected for in-depth review. The findings indicate a considerable variation: 13 trials did not specify the use of antiemetics, while 31 provided criteria for antiemetics, with 13 conforming to local standards, six to international guidelines, and five allowing either. Seven trials recommended effective antiemetics without detailed criteria. This inconsistency led to a range of steroid dosages, with only 11 trials advocating for minimizing or avoiding steroids for antiemetic purposes. CONCLUSION: The research highlights the lack of uniformity in antiemetic steroid use in trials, reflecting diverse clinical practices and underscoring the need for further research to understand the implications on treatment outcomes.


Assuntos
Antieméticos , Humanos , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/prevenção & controle
2.
Cancer Med ; 13(9): e7235, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716626

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab both demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the CheckMate 648 trial, leading to approvals of both nivolumab-containing regimens in many countries. We report longer-term follow-up data. METHODS: This open-label, phase III trial (NCT03143153) enrolled adults with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥1% and then in the overall population. RESULTS: A total of 970 patients were randomly assigned. After 29 months of minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate improvement in OS versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59 [95% CI: 0.46-0.76]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.65-0.93]) and with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.62 [95% CI: 0.48-0.80]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.65-0.92]). In patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated PFS benefit versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51-0.89]); PFS benefit was not observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 1.04 [95% CI: 0.79-1.36]). Among all treated patients (n = 936), Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 151 (49%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy), 105 (32%, nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and 110 (36%, chemotherapy) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS benefit versus chemotherapy with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up, further supporting use as first-line standard treatment options for patients with advanced ESCC.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Ipilimumab , Nivolumabe , Humanos , Ipilimumab/administração & dosagem , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Ipilimumab/efeitos adversos , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/patologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Seguimentos , Adulto , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
3.
Cancer Med ; 12(8): 9541-9546, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36808819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with elevated cardiovascular risks, evidence of any association between ICIs and myocardial infarction (MI) was scarce, especially in Asians. METHODS: Using prospectively collected population-based data, this self-controlled case series included patients prescribed an ICI between 1/1/2014 and 31/12/2020 in Hong Kong who had MI within January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2021. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for MI during and after ICI exposure were estimated, compared to the year before ICI initiation. RESULTS: Of 3684 identified ICI users, 24 had MI during the study period. MI incidence increased significantly in the first 90 days of exposure (IRR 3.59 [95% confidence interval: 1.31-9.83], p = 0.013), but not days 91-180 (p = 0.148) or ≥181 (p = 0.591) of exposure, nor postexposure (p = 0.923). Sensitivity analyses excluding patients with MI-related death and incorporating extended exposure periods produced consistent results separately. CONCLUSIONS: ICIs were associated with increased MI incidence in Asian Chinese patients during the first 90 days of use, but not later.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio/induzido quimicamente , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Incidência , Hong Kong/epidemiologia
4.
Cancer Med ; 12(8): 9384-9391, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36806947

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding associations between peripheral blood biomarkers (PBBMs) and survival, response, and toxicity in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (R/M HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, a dataset of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with ICIs between 08/2012-03/2021 was established, including demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics. Pretreatment PBBMs were collected and evaluated for associations with grade ≥3 adverse events (G ≥ 3AE) by CTCAEv5, objective response (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable models for each outcome were created using elastic net variable selection. RESULTS: Our study included 186 patients, with 51 (27%) demonstrating complete or partial response to immunotherapy. Multivariable models adjusted for ECOG performance status (PS), p16, and smoking demonstrated that pretreatment higher LDH and absolute neutrophils, as well as lower percent lymphocytes correlated with worse OS and PFS. Higher LDH and lower % lymphocytes also correlated with worse ORR. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to date examining PBBMs in ICI-treated R/M HNSCCs, our variable selection method revealed PBBMs prognostic for survival and response to immunotherapy. These biomarkers warrant further investigation in a prospective study along with validation with CPS biomarker.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , L-Lactato Desidrogenase , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Linfócitos/patologia , Biomarcadores
5.
Cancer Med ; 12(22): 20783-20797, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37962239

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient survival in advanced/metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has improved with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Biomarkers' role in prognosis and treatment has been limited by conflicting trial results. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study analyzed baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data versus outcomes of The US Oncology Network adult outpatients. Patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma, NSCLC, or RCC treated between January 1, 2015 and November 30, 2020 were given ICI monotherapy or combination therapy with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab. Treatment outcomes (overall survival [OS], time to treatment discontinuation, time to next treatment) were followed longitudinally until May 31, 2021, last patient record, or date of death. Baseline blood cell counts, including absolute monocyte count (AMC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and eosinophil count, were subdivided into quintiles for univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Data from 18,186 patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma (n = 3314), NSCLC (n = 12,416), and RCC (n = 2456) were analyzed. Better OS correlated with increased baseline serum albumin concentration, increased eosinophil and lymphocyte counts, and Western United States physician practice location. Decreased OS correlated with increased AMC, MLR, ANC, age, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the largest to date to associate baseline survival indicators and outcomes in outpatients with advanced/metastatic melanoma, NSCLC, or RCC and receiving ICIs. Results may inform disease-specific prognostic models and help providers identify patients most likely to benefit from ICI therapy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Melanoma , Adulto , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Contagem de Linfócitos , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa