Comparative clinical study of short-term outcomes between table fenestrated and chimney endovascular aneurysm repair for hostile neck aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Hostile neck abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is challenging for standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We sought to compare fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) and chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (chEVAR) for hostile neck AAA. METHODS: Patients were identified retrospectively. Hostile neck anatomy was defined as a proximal neck length of <15 mm or angulation >60°. The choice of fEVAR or chEVAR was based on neck anatomy and physician preference. Type I endoleak (T1EL) was the primary outcome. Other outcomes included type III endoleak (T3EL), visceral stent occlusion, renal insufficiency, reintervention, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were included from April 2012 to December 2021. fEVAR and chEVAR patients were 48 and 36 cases, respectively. Both groups showed similar rate of T1EL, T3EL, visceral stent occlusion, renal insufficiency, reintervention, and mortality. However, chEVAR patients had a more tortuous neck (61.1% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.001), while fEVAR patients had a greater neck size (29.5 ± 6.3 mm vs. 24.5 ± 4.8 mm, p < 0.001) and more reconstructing target arteries (2.2 ± 1.1 vs 1.3 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: fEVAR and chEVAR show similar safe and effective outcomes in well-selected hostile neck. fEVAR might be able to reconstruct multiple visceral arteries, and chEVAR seems justified in patients with poor anatomical suitability for fEVAR.

Successful chimney endovascular aortic repair with reconstruction of three visceral branches for huge saccular juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm after trans-thoracoabdominal esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Conventional graft replacement for a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JRAAA) remains challenging for high-risk patients since it often requires the reconstruction of some visceral arteries. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old woman was diagnosed with an 87 × 48 mm saccular JRAAA. Open graft replacement was contraindicated because of frailty and a past history of trans-thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. Chimney endovascular aortic repair (ChEVAR) with three chimney endografts was successfully performed without any endoleaks, and each visceral circulation was kept intact. The patient was discharged uneventfully on postoperative day 8. Significant shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac and preservation of flow through each chimney graft were observed on computed tomography 6 months postoperatively, with no significant increase in serum creatinine levels on laboratory testing. CONCLUSIONS: ChEVAR can be a useful surgical option instead of conventional operations, especially for high-risk cases.

Endovascular Repair of a Ruptured Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm With the Sandwich Technique: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: aortic aneurysms involving the renal and visceral arteries are endovascular challenges, especially for emergencies. We report a case of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in a morbidly obese 71-year-old man. The patient was admitted with a stable hemodynamic state. A computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed a contained ruptured TAAA with an occluded celiac trunk and left renal artery due to previous nephrectomy. Due to the emergency and his comorbidities, we performed an endovascular aortic repair with the sandwich technique and 2 chimneys. Two bridging stents (chimneys) were deployed between the aorta and the target vessels (superior mesenteric and right renal arteries) in a space created in-between 2 aortic straight endografts. Ten days postoperative, acute renal failure appeared and right renal stent occlusion was diagnosed on CTA. Unfortunately, no adequate kidney revascularization could be obtained, requiring permanent hemodialysis. At a 3-month follow-up visit, the patient did well with stable aneurysm dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: encouraging outcomes of chimney-EVAR techniques, comparable to those in published reports of fenestrated-EVAR and branched-EVAR, support this procedure as a valid off-the-shelf available alternative in emergency situations. Nevertheless, only few midterm results achieved are actually available and long-term outcomes are actually unknown.