Skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infection after obstetrics and gynecological abdominal surgery: A quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: One of the most common causes of postoperative morbidity is postoperative surgical site infection (SSI). Healthcare-associated infection is a subject of great concern in healthcare services. The goal of the present study is to estimate the relative effectiveness of skin preparation solution chlorhexidine scrub followed by povidone-iodine painting in the prevention of SSIs after caesarean delivery and abdominal gynecological surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a 1-year randomized prospective research done at a tertiary care institution in western Rajasthan. Women who underwent caesarean and gynecological operations were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to have the surgical site painted with 10% povidone-iodine or a chlorhexidine-alcohol preparatory scrub followed by povidone-iodine paint. According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, the outcomes were any SSI occurring within a week or during the 30-day follow-up period following the operation, including any superficial or deep SSI. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (povidone-iodine paint) received 121 patients, whereas Group B (chlorhexidine scrub + povidone-iodine paint) received 129 cases. The overall SSI rate in the present study was 8.76%. The SSI rate was lower in Group B (chlorhexidine scrub + povidone-iodine paint) as compared to Group A (povidone-iodine paint only) (5.4% vs. 12.4%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted that chlorhexidine-alcohol scrubbing followed by povidone-iodine painting provides superior skin antisepsis in comparison to povidone-iodine painting alone.

Cost-effectiveness analysis and safety of erythromycin 4% gel and 4% chlorhexidine scrub for pitted keratolysis treatment.

Background: Studies of Pitted keratolysis (PK) treatment are limited. Objectives: To study cost-effectiveness and to compare the safety of 4% chlorhexidine scrub with 4% erythromycin gel, for PK infections. Materials and methods: This cohort study was conducted on naval rating cadets with a clinical diagnosis of PK at Chumpol Naval Rating School, Thailand in 2016. Participants were randomly treated with either 4% erythromycin gel or 4% chlorhexidine scrub for 4 weeks. The clinical examinations were evaluated at the baseline and at 1 and 2 months after treatment. A decision-tree model was used to evaluate the costs, resource utilization and outcomes as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Results: Of 344 naval rating cadets, 125 (36.3%) were diagnosed with PK. Sixty-four were treated with erythromycin. Approximately 80% of participants had complete resolution Foot odor were significantly improved at 2 months (p < .001) for both groups. No adverse effects were reported. Total cost for 4 weeks' treatment with the erythromycin gel and chlorhexidine scrub was US$77.34, US$51.9, respectively. Chlorhexidine treatment and erythromycin gel had 0.1526 and 0.1425 QALYs, respectively. Conclusions: treatment of PK with either 4% chlorhexidine scrub or 4% erythromycin gel had similar outcomes. However, using chlorhexidine scrub was more cost-effective.