Precision of the ultrasonography-integrated tibial extramedullary guide for total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Precise determination of the tibial mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) requires intraoperative identification of the talus center. We present the ultrasonography-integrated tibial extramedullary guide (USG) that enables real-time visualization of the talus. This study assesses the precision of USG compared to computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and validates the efficacy of USG. METHODS: We evaluated 58 patients (62 knees) who underwent primary TKA retrospectively, categorizing them into USG and CAS groups (31 each). We statistically analyzed demographic data, the preoperative alignment of the tibial plateau to the mechanical axis, the postoperative alignment of the tibial component to planned alignment on 3D-CT, pain visual analog scale, and WOMAC scores. Additionally, the frequency of postoperative outlier from planned alignment over 2° was statistically compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the preoperative data between the groups. The accuracy (mean deviation from the planned alignment) in both groups was not statistically different. However, in terms of the precision of coronal alignment, the USG group exhibited lower variance than the CAS group in the F-test (F value = 2.76, p = 0.023). Moreover, there were no postoperative deviations beyond 2 degrees in the USG group, in contrast to a 20% outlier frequency in the CAS group (p = 0.024). Concerning the precision of sagittal alignment (variance and deviations over 2°), no statistical differences were identified. CONCLUSION: The USG demonstrated higher precision in the tibial coronal plane than CAS in coronal alignment. Direct identification of the individual talus may enhance precision.

Accuracy assessment of implant placement with versus without a CAD/CAM surgical guide by novices versus specialists via the digital registration method: an in vitro randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Many studies demonstrated that surgical guides might reduce discrepancies compared with freehand implant placement. This randomized crossover study aimed to assess the effects of approaches, practitioners' experience and learning sequences on the accuracy of single tooth implantation via digital registration method. No similar study was found. METHODS: This in vitro randomized crossover study enrolled 60 novice students (Group S) and 10 experienced instructors (Group I). Sixty students were randomly and evenly assigned to two groups (Group SA and SB). In Group SA, 30 students first performed single molar implant on a simulation model freehand (Group SAFH), and then with a CAD/CAM surgical guide (Group SASG). In Group SB, another 30 students first performed guided (Group SBSG) and then freehand (Group SBFH). Ten instructors were also divided into Group IAFH/IASG (n = 5) and IBSG/IBFH (n = 5) following the same rules. The accuracy of implant placement was assessed by the coronal and apical distance (mm) and angular (°) deviations using the digital registration method. T tests and nonparametric tests were used to compare the results among different groups of approaches, experience and sequences. RESULTS: For students, the coronal and apical distance and the angular deviations were significantly lower in surgical guide group than freehand group in total and in learning freehand first subgroup, but for learning surgical guide first subgroup the apical distance deviation showed no significant difference between two approaches. For students, the angular deviation of freehand group was significantly lower in learning surgical guide first group than learning freehand first group. For instructors, the coronal and apical distance and angular deviations showed no significant difference between two approaches and two sequences. For freehand approach, the coronal and apical distance and the angular deviations were significantly higher in student group than instructor group, while not significantly different between two groups for surgical guide approach. CONCLUSIONS: For novices, using a surgical guide for the first implant placement may reduce the potential deviations compared with freehand surgery, and may reach a comparable accuracy with that of specialists. For simple single molar implantation, the surgical guide may not be significantly helpful for experienced specialists.

Component gap measurement reflects the planned gap balance during total knee arthroplasty more accurately and reliably than bone surface gap measurement.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the reliability of two gap assessment methods (component and bone surface gap measurement vs. planned gap balance) and identify the contributors to component gaps other than planned gaps. METHODS: The prospectively collected data for 122 consecutive primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs; 114 patients). After femoral planning for gap balancing, the medial and lateral planned gaps were calculated (planned gap). The established medial extension and flexion gaps (MEG and MFG, respectively) and lateral extension and flexion gaps (LEG and LFG, respectively) were measured with and without the TKA components (bone surface and component gaps) at 0° and 90° flexion. The intraclass and Pearson correlation coefficients for each gap measurement method were assessed using planned gap values, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify the contributors to component gaps. RESULTS: Compared with the bone surface gap measurement, the component gap measurement showed higher reliability and stronger correlation with the planned gap balance for each gap. The changes in the medial posterior femoral offset contributed to the MEG and LEG, whereas those in the joint line height contributed to the LEG. The changes in the hip-knee-ankle angle and lateral posterior femoral offset contributed to the LFG. CONCLUSION: Component gap measurements of the established gap more accurately and reliably reflect the planned gap balance than do bone surface gap measurements. The established gaps are affected by several factors other than femoral planning.

Recent Advances in Digital Technology in Implant Dentistry.

Digital technology has emerged as a transformative tool in dental implantation, profoundly enhancing accuracy and effectiveness across multiple facets, such as diagnosis, preoperative treatment planning, surgical procedures, and restoration delivery. The multiple integration of radiographic data and intraoral data, sometimes with facial scan data or electronic facebow through virtual planning software, enables comprehensive 3-dimensional visualization of the hard and soft tissue and the position of future restoration, resulting in heightened diagnostic precision. In virtual surgery design, the incorporation of both prosthetic arrangement and individual anatomical details enables the virtual execution of critical procedures (e.g., implant placement, extended applications, etc.) through analysis of cross-sectional images and the reconstruction of 3-dimensional surface models. After verification, the utilization of digital technology including templates, navigation, combined techniques, and implant robots achieved seamless transfer of the virtual treatment plan to the actual surgical sites, ultimately leading to enhanced surgical outcomes with highly improved accuracy. In restoration delivery, digital techniques for impression, shade matching, and prosthesis fabrication have advanced, enabling seamless digital data conversion and efficient communication among clinicians and technicians. Compared with clinical medicine, artificial intelligence (AI) technology in dental implantology primarily focuses on diagnosis and prediction. AI-supported preoperative planning and surgery remain in developmental phases, impeded by the complexity of clinical cases and ethical considerations, thereby constraining widespread adoption.

Patient-specific plates for facial fracture surgery: A retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVES: Surgeons often encounter challenges when treating maxillofacial fractures using conventional methods that involve trimming or bending ready-made titanium plates for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) since it can be time-consuming, imprecise, and inconvenient. This retrospective case series aimed to introduce a novel bone reduction method that utilizes virtual planning, patient-specific surgical guides, and titanium plates. METHODS: Seven patients with mandibular symphysis or subcondylar fractures resulting from facial trauma underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or facial CT scans, and their medical histories were documented. Virtual surgery was conducted based on three-dimensional (3D) stereolithography images derived from CT scans using the FaceGide software (MegaGen, Daegu, Korea). ORIF was performed using patient-specific surgical guides and plates that were designed, printed, and milled. Radiographic, clinical, and occlusal evaluations were conducted at two weeks and six weeks postoperatively. Subsequently, 3D images from virtual surgery and postoperative CT scans were compared. RESULTS: The comparison of 3D virtual surgery and postoperative images revealed minimal surface differences of less than 1 mm. T-scan evaluations indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the two- and six-week postoperative assessments. Favorable clinical outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION: This novel method demonstrated stable outcomes in terms of occlusion and healing, with no notable complications. Consequently, this approach may serve as a viable alternative to conventional methods. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Facial fracture surgery that utilizes patient-specific surgical guides and plates within a digital workflow can facilitate meticulous surgical planning, reducing the risk of complications and minimizing operation time.

Digital guides to facilitate retained root removal and simultaneous implant placement.

The aim of this study was to report the use of digital guides to locate impacted residual roots (IRR) (location guide) and to simultaneously insert dental implants (surgical guide). This case series included five patients. The IRR was first removed through a lateral window approach using the digital location guide, then the implant was placed simultaneously with the implant surgical guide. Definitive restorations were completed after a 6-month healing period. An average of 13.0 ± 3.1 minutes was required to locate the IRR. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was obtained during surgery and before digital coping using a non-invasive resonance frequency measurement. The average ISQ during surgery for the five dental implants was 60.2 ± 6.3, and the value increased to 66.6 ± 4.8 before final restoration. The average deviations at the implant neck and root apex were 0.48 ± 0.25 mm and 0.74 ± 0.46 mm, respectively. The average angular deviation was 3.5 ± 1.4°. Bone resorption at the implant neck was a mean 0.072 ± 0.041 mm before final restoration. All implants functioned well at 1 year after final restoration. The application of surgical guides in the extraction of IRR enabled crestal bone preservation and simultaneous implant placement.

[Application of aided three-dimension CT navigation system in craniocervical junction malformation disease surgery].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the related problems of three-dimension CT navigation system applied to craniocervical junction malformation diseases surgery. METHODS: The clinical data of 61 patients with craniocervical junction malformation disease who underwent surgical treatment from July 2015 to March 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 39 males and 22 females aged from 25 to 73 years old with a mean of (46.20±12.09) years. According to the different ways of screw placements, these patients were divided into navigation group (30 cases) and non navigation group (31 cases). The screws insertion in the navigation group were guided under three-dimension CT computer-aided navigation system, while the screws insertion were guided by C-arm fluoroscopy and intraoperative anatomical landmarks in non-navigation group. All surgeries were performed by the same group of surgeons. All cases were scanned by CT after operation to assess the accuracy of the screw insertion. RESULTS: A total of 122 screws were inserted in the study, including 60 screws in navigation group and 62 screws in non-navigation group. The screw positions in navigation group were all satisfactory, and there were no screw-related complications. The position of 3 screws (4.83%) in non-navigation group was not satisfactory, and there was no obvious neurological symptoms after operation. The operation time of navigation group was from 87.5 to 112.5 min with a mean of (99.6± 12.0) min;and non-navigation group was from 87.5 to 107.5 min, with a mean of (97.5±10.5) min. There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time between two groups (P>0.05). The screw insertion time in navigation group was from 1.50 to 4.20 min, with a mean of (2.51±1.02) min;and non navigation group was from 1.80 to 5.10 min, with a mean of (3.25±1.05) min. The screw insertion time in navigation group was shorter than that in non-navigation group (P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in navigation group was from 122 to 153 ml, with a mean of (137.57±9.48) ml, which in non-navigation group wasfrom 121 to 158 ml, with a mean of (138.75±8.56) ml, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The three-dimensional CT computer-aided navigation system has the characteristics of clear imaging and accurate positioning, which can help improve the accuracy and safety of the screw insertion in craniocervical junction malformation disease surgery.

Computer-assisted versus traditional freehand technique for mandibular reconstruction with free vascularized fibular flap: A matched-pair study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to perform a surgery-related and patient-related outcome analysis of a case-matched series of patients treated with computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and traditional freehand surgery. METHODS: A total of 153 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction by VFF were included from Jan 1999 to Dec 2019. The mandibular resection and reconstruction were performed by four experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Reasons for reconstruction were oncologic, osteoradionecrosis, trauma, and osteoporosis. All the patients were followed up postoperatively for at least 1 year. Eighteen pairs were formed with the matched cohort consisting of a total of 36 patients who underwent primary mandibular reconstruction without additional combined flaps. The surgery-related and patient-related continuous and categorical parameters were assessed in both groups. RESULTS: The average operation time and bleeding volume in the CAS group were less than those in the non-CAS group. Additionally, both hospitalization and ICU days were lower in the CAS group without any significant difference. The only significant finding related to surgical parameters was observed for the ischemia time, which was lower in the CAS group. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted surgery indicated improved efficiency considering reduced ischemia time, operation time, and length of hospital stay with lower early complications than that of conventional surgical procedures. It can thus be considered as an optimized alternative to the freehand approach.

Role of Navigation in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Surgeon's Perspectives.

Surgeries related to the maxillofacial area deal with an intricate network of anatomical structures. With the complexity of the vital structures, it necessitates a surgical team to respect each anatomical boundary. In the past, there was an exceptionally high number of cases with surgical errors. These errors were not because of flaws in the surgeon's skills or techniques but owing to lack of resources. Visualisation is one of the key factors that determines the precision of any surgical outcome. Advances in surgical planning have led to the introduction of a "Navigation" system that helps surgeons to see more, know more and ultimately do more for their patients. The usefulness of the navigation system in oral surgeries has been indicated by its surgical applications in craniomaxillofacial trauma, orthognathic surgeries, head and neck pathological resections, complex skull base surgeries and surgery involving temporomandibular joint. A vast majority of research literature has suggested remarkable improvement in surgical outcomes under the guidance of 3d planning and navigation. However, with such an inordinate advancement, financial expenses and a gradual learning curve are always a constraining factor in surgical navigation. This article overviews indication of navigation in craniofacial surgeries with a focus on applied aspect, planning and solution to the future problem.