Evaluation of Phenotypic Tests to Detect Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Klebsiella oxytoca Complex Strains.

Klebsiella oxytoca complex (KoC) species may overproduce their chromosomal class A OXY ß-lactamases, conferring reduced susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and aztreonam. Moreover, since clavulanate maintains its ability to inhibit these enzymes, the resulting resistance phenotype may falsely resemble the production of acquired extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs). In this work, a collection of 44 KoC strains of human and animal origin was characterized with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and broth microdilution (BMD) susceptibility testing. Comparison of ESBL producers (n = 11; including CTX-M-15 [n = 6] and CTX-M-1 [n = 5] producers) and hyperproducers of OXYs (n = 21) showed certain phenotypic differences: piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC90s: 16 versus >64 µg/mL), cefotaxime (MIC90s: 64 versus 4 µg/mL), ceftazidime (MIC90s: 32 versus 4 µg/mL), cefepime (MIC90s: 8 versus 4 µg/mL) and associated resistance to non-ß-lactams (e.g., trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: 90.9% versus 14.3%, respectively). However, a clear phenotype-based distinction between the two groups was difficult. Therefore, we evaluated 10 different inhibitor-based confirmatory tests to allow such categorization. All tests showed a sensitivity of 100%. However, only combination disk tests (CDTs) with cefepime/cefepime-clavulanate and ceftazidime/ceftazidime-clavulanate or the double-disk synergy test (DDST) showed high specificity (100%, 95.5%, and 100%, respectively). All confirmatory tests in BMD or using the MIC gradient strip did not perform well (specificity, ≤87.5%). Of note, ceftazidime/ceftazidime-avibactam tests also exhibited low specificity (CDT, 87.5%; MIC gradient strip, 77.8%). Our results indicate that standard antimicrobial susceptibility profiles can raise some suspicion, but only the use of cefepime/cefepime-clavulanate CDT or DDST can guarantee distinction between ESBL-producing KoC strains and those hyperproducing OXY enzymes.

Copy-number analysis by base-level normalization: An intuitive visualization tool for evaluating copy number variations.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) facilitates comprehensive molecular analyses that help with diagnosing unsolved disorders. In addition to detecting single-nucleotide variations and small insertions/deletions, bioinformatics tools can identify copy number variations (CNVs) in NGS data, which improves the diagnostic yield. However, due to the possibility of false positives, subsequent confirmation tests are generally performed. Here, we introduce Copy-number Analysis by BAse-level NormAlization (CABANA), a visualization tool that allows users to intuitively identify candidate CNVs using the normalized single-base-level read depth calculated from NGS data. To demonstrate how CABANA works, NGS data were obtained from 474 patients with neuromuscular disorders. CNVs were screened using a conventional bioinformatics tool, ExomeDepth, and then we normalized and visualized those data at the single-base level using CABANA, followed by manual inspection by geneticists to filter out false positives and determine candidate CNVs. In doing so, we identified 31 candidate CNVs (7%) in 474 patients and subsequently confirmed all of them to be true using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. The performance of CABANA was deemed acceptable by comparing its diagnostic yield with previous data about neuromuscular disorders. Despite some limitations, we expect CABANA to help researchers accurately identify CNVs and reduce the need for subsequent confirmation testing.

Japan Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism 2021.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates than essential hypertension. The Japan Endocrine Society (JES) has developed an updated guideline for PA, based on the evidence, especially from Japan. We should preferentially screen hypertensive patients with a high prevalence of PA with aldosterone to renin ratio ≥200 and plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) ≥60 pg/mL as a cut-off of positive results. While we should confirm excess aldosterone secretion by one positive confirmatory test, we could bypass patients with typical PA findings. Since PAC became lower due to a change in assay methods from radioimmunoassay to chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, borderline ranges were set for screening and confirmatory tests and provisionally designated as positive. We recommend individualized medicine for those in the borderline range for the next step. We recommend evaluating cortisol co-secretion in patients with adrenal macroadenomas. Although we recommend adrenal venous sampling for lateralization before adrenalectomy, we should carefully select patients rather than all patients, and we suggest bypassing in young patients with typical PA findings. A selectivity index ≥5 and a lateralization index >4 after adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation defines successful catheterization and unilateral subtype diagnosis. We recommend adrenalectomy for unilateral PA and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for bilateral PA. Systematic as well as individualized clinical practice is always warranted. This JES guideline 2021 provides updated rational evidence and recommendations for the clinical practice of PA, leading to improved quality of the clinical practice of hypertension.

Evaluation of Geenius HIV-1/2 Confirmatory Assay for the confirmatory and differential diagnosis of HIV-1/HIV-2 in Japan and reliability of the Geenius Reader in the diagnosis of HIV-2.

BACKGROUND: NEW LAV BLOT I and II (LAV I and LAV II), they were only option for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) confirmatory test, following HIV screening test using HIV Ag/Ab combination test in Japan. We evaluated the performance of Geenius HIV-1/2 Confirmatory Assay (Geenius), both as a confirmatory test and for differentiation between HIV-1 and HIV-2, in comparison with LAV I and LAV II. METHODS: Eighty-nine HIV-1-positive plasma specimens, one anti-HIV-1 low-titer performance panel, 10 seroconversion panels, and two anti-HIV-1/2 combo performance panels were tested. The results were read with the Geenius Reader and by visual reading. RESULTS: All 89 HIV-1-positive plasma specimens were identified as HIV-1-positive using Geenius; this 100% success rate was superior to that with LAV I (95.5% using WHO criteria, 98.9% using CDC criteria). The HIV-1-positive specimens showed low cross-reactivity with HIV-2 lines in Geenius. The sensitivity of Geenius for HIV-1 detection was the same as or greater than that of LAV I, but less than that of Genscreen HIV Ag-Ab ULT, in our analysis of the commercial performance and seroconversion panels. In contrast, five of the 13 HIV-2-positive specimens that had been identified as HIV-positive untypable by visual reading because of their cross-reactivity to HIV-1 lines were successfully identified by the Geenius Reader as HIV-2-positive with cross-reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Geenius provides strong performance for HIV confirmatory tests and HIV-1 differentiation tests. However, when visual reading is used, its performance in HIV-2 differentiation is less reliable. Because HIV-2 infection has been sporadically reported in Japan, the use of the Geenius Reader is preferable to ensure more reliable HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation.

Establishment of a novel diagnostic test algorithm for human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 infection with line immunoassay replacement of western blotting: a collaborative study for performance evaluation of diagnostic assays in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The reliable diagnosis of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection is important, particularly as it can be vertically transmitted by breast feeding mothers to their infants. However, current diagnosis in Japan requires a confirmatory western blot (WB) test after screening/primary testing for HTLV-1 antibodies, but this test often gives indeterminate results. Thus, this collaborative study evaluated the reliability of diagnostic assays for HTLV-1 infection, including a WB-based one, along with line immunoassay (LIA) as an alternative to WB for confirmatory testing. RESULTS: Using peripheral blood samples from blood donors and pregnant women previously serologically screened and subjected to WB analysis, we analyzed the performances of 10 HTLV-1 antibody assay kits commercially available in Japan. No marked differences in the performances of eight of the screening kits were apparent. However, LIA determined most of the WB-indeterminate samples to be conclusively positive or negative (an 88.0% detection rate). When we also compared the sensitivity to HTLV-1 envelope gp21 with that of other antigens by LIA, the sensitivity to gp21 was the strongest. When we also compared the sensitivity to envelope gp46 by LIA with that of WB, LIA showed stronger sensitivity to gp46 than WB did. These findings indicate that LIA is an alternative confirmatory test to WB analysis without gp21. Therefore, we established a novel diagnostic test algorithm for HTLV-1 infection in Japan, including both the performance of a confirmatory test where LIA replaced WB on primary test-reactive samples and an additional decision based on a standardized nucleic acid detection step (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) on the confirmatory test-indeterminate samples. The final assessment of the clinical usefulness of this algorithm involved performing WB analysis, LIA, and/or PCR in parallel for confirmatory testing of known reactive samples serologically screened at clinical laboratories. Consequently, LIA followed by PCR (LIA/PCR), but neither WB/PCR nor PCR/LIA, was found to be the most reliable diagnostic algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Because the above results show that our novel algorithm is clinically useful, we propose that it is recommended for solving the aforementioned WB-associated reliability issues and for providing a more rapid and precise diagnosis of HTLV-1 infection.

Construction of a predictive scoring system as a guide to screening and confirmation of the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent cause of secondary hypertension. In Southern Thailand, the aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR) is only available within a small number of tertiary centres, necessitating need for a simple clinical assessment to determine the requirement for ARR. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify predictive factors for the diagnosis of PA and generate a predictive scoring system (PSS) for use in screening and diagnosis of PA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 420 patients aged >15 years with paired plasma aldosterone concentration and plasma renin activity values allowing calculation of ARR were identified from the electronic hospital database between 2011 and 2016. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of PA was 16.7% (range; adrenal incidentaloma 5.6% to hypokalaemia 30%). Predictive factors for diagnosis of PA were as follows: age <60 years, BMI < 25 kg/m2 , presence of diabetes, ≥3 antihypertensive agents, serum sodium ≥ 141 mmol/L and serum potassium < 3.5 mmol/L. A predictive scoring system (PSS) (range -2 to 13) was generated by the coefficients of the variables with ROC curve AUC 0.87 [95% CI: 0.83-0.91]. Using the PSS, a total score <4 provided a robust negative predictive value (sensitivity, 0.97; specificity, 0.48; NPV, 0.99; PPV, 0.27) for PA. In patients at high risk of PA (PAC > 15 ng/dL and PRA < 1.0 ng/mL/hr), a PSS score > 9 had specificity and PPV of 100%, essentially confirming PA in these individuals. CONCLUSION: The proposed PSS for PA will enable more focused and cost-effective use of ARR screening and confirmatory testing. In our cohort, 40% and 42% of patients would not require ARR screening or confirmatory tests, respectively.

[Update and Research Progress in the Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism].

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension. The diagnosis procedure of PA includes screening, confirmatory diagnosis and subtype classification. International and national guidelines recommended plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) to plasma renin activity (PRA) ratio (ARR) to detect possible cases of PA, and one or more tests (fludrocortisone suppression test, saline infusion test, oral sodium loading test, or captopril challenge test) to confirm ARR positive patients. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is also recommended as the best method to distinguish unilateral and bilateral adrenal disease when surgical treatment is feasible and desired by the patient. However, many studies find that each of the above diagnostic method has shortcomings. Recently, more and more studies are attempting to explore new methods with higher diagnostic efficiency and more conveniences, including new screening tests, new confirmatory diagnostic tests, new imaging and pathological histology methods. In our studies, the regression model, which included upright PAC, upright PRA, and lowest potassium, is superior to ARR for PA screening; the blood potassium and the ratio of blood potassium to blood sodium after the saline infusion test are not suitable for PA subtyping. This article will review the advances and progress in PA diagnosis.

Confirmatory tests for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Saline infusion test (SIT), captopril challenge test (CCT), fludrocortisone suppression test (FST) and oral sodium loading test (SLT) are recommended by the Endocrine Society's Clinical Practice Guidelines to diagnose primary aldosteronism, but which one is the best remains controversial. We aimed to summarize the available comparative data and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these four tests. DESIGN: We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published between January 1980 and January 2018. PATIENTS: Eligible studies reported on the accuracy of one or more of the four confirmatory tests in patients suspected of PA. MEASUREMENTS: Two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction of all selected studies, which consisted of study characteristics and data to estimate the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and the corresponding summary area under the curve (SAUC), pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: We identified 26 articles including 3686 patients. Fifteen articles evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CCT, 10 of SIT, 1 of FST and none of SLT. For CCT, the SAUC was 0.9207, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.89) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86), respectively. For SIT, the SAUC was 0.9232, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.87) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85-0.89), respectively. For FST, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.66-0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.82-0.99), respectively. Overall, we found no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy of CCT and SIT. CONCLUSIONS: CCT and SIT exhibit high and comparable accuracy for diagnosing PA. CCT may be a more feasible alternative as it is safe and much easier to perform.

Modified interpretation criteria significantly improve performance of commercially available confirmatory assays for the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: a case-control study with clinically defined serum samples.

Case-control study for the evaluation of innovative test formats for second-tier testing for the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis (LB). A head-to-head comparison was performed with the test systems ViraStripe, SeraSpot, ViraChip, and recomBead. Serum samples from 62 patients (21 erythema migrans, 33 Lyme neuroborreliosis, 8 late LB) and 91 controls (including 29 potentially cross-reacting sera) were tested. For ViraChip and recomBead, optimised interpretation criteria were developed for both IgG and IgM. The most important modification for the proposed interpretation criteria for ViraChip is the interpretation of strong (> 2.5-fold above cutoff) singular IgG reactions against VlsE as positive. This significantly improves sensitivity (32 to 85%, p < 0.0001) without significant changes in specificity (borderline reactions interpreted as negative). By application of our modified rules, specificity of ViraChip IgM is significantly increased (89 to 97%, p < 0.05; borderline results included to negatives), and sensitivities of recomBead IgG and IgM are also significantly improved (69 to 87%, p < 0.01, and 57 to 74%, p < 0.01, respectively; borderline results included to positives). Further improvement of sensitivity by the rating of strong singular IgG reactions against VlsE as positive can also be shown for recomBead. IgG/IgM result combinations must be interpreted as a function of the assumed disease stage, and the best combinations differ for the various assays. Application of our proposed interpretation criteria significantly improve the discriminatory abilities of two assays; however, this must be confirmed with other data sets. Recommendations from Scientific Societies should be updated as may be necessary.

Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?

INTRODUCTIONIn 2010, we published an initial Point-Counterpoint on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). At that time, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) were just becoming commercially available, and the idea of algorithmic approaches to CDI was being explored. Now, there are numerous NAATs in the marketplace, and based on recent proficiency test surveys, they have become the predominant method used for CDI diagnosis in the United States. At the same time, there is a body of literature that suggests that NAATs lack clinical specificity and thus inflate CDI rates. Hospital administrators are taking note of institutional CDI rates because they are publicly reported. They have become an important metric impacting hospital safety ratings and value-based purchasing; hospitals may have millions of dollars of reimbursement at risk. In this Point-Counterpoint using a frequently asked question approach, Ferric Fang of the University of Washington, who has been a consistent advocate for a NAAT-only approach for CDI diagnosis, will discuss the value of a NAAT-only approach, while Christopher Polage of the University of California Davis and Mark Wilcox of Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom, each of whom has recently written important articles on the value of toxin detection in the diagnosis, will discuss the impact of toxin detection in CDI diagnosis.

Captopril challenge test: an underutilized test in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of endocrine hypertension and is often underdiagnosed. This condition is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in comparison to age and blood pressure matched individuals with essential hypertension (EH). The diagnostic pathway for PA consists of three phases: screening, confirmatory testing, and subtyping. The lack of specificity in the screening step, which relies on the aldosterone to renin ratio, necessitates confirmatory testing. The Endocrine Society's clinical practice guideline suggests four confirmatory tests, including the fludrocortisone suppression test (FST), saline suppression test (SST), captopril challenge test (CCT), and oral sodium loading test (SLT). There is no universally accepted choice of confirmatory test, with practices varying among centers. The SST and FST are commonly used, but they can be resource-intensive, carry risks such as volume overload or hypokalemia, and are contraindicated in severe/uncontrolled HTN as well as in cardiac and renal impairment. In contrast, CCT is a safe and inexpensive alternative that can be performed in an outpatient setting and can be applied when other tests are contraindicated. Despite its simplicity and convenience, the variability in captopril dose, testing posture, and diagnostic threshold limit its widespread use. This narrative review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the CCT across different populations, addresses controversies in its usage, and proposes recommendations for its use in the diagnosis of PA. Furthermore, suggestions for future research aimed at promoting the wider utilization of the CCT as a simpler, safer, and more cost-effective diagnostic test are discussed.

Investigating the cut-off values of captopril challenge test for primary aldosteronism using the novel chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay method: a retrospective cohort study.

The measurement evolution enabled more accurate evaluation of aldosterone production in hypertensive patients. However, the cut-off values for novel assays have been not sufficiently validated. The present study was undertaken to validate the novel chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for aldosterone in conjunction with other methods. Moreover, we also aimed to establish a new cut-off value for primary aldosteronism in the captopril challenge test using the novel assay. First, we collected 390 plasma samples, in which aldosterone levels measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry ranged between 0.18 and 1346 ng/dL. The novel chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay showed identical correlation of plasma aldosterone with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, in contrast to conventional radioimmunoassay. Further, we enrolled 299 and 39 patients with primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension, respectively. Plasma aldosterone concentrations measured using the novel assay were lower than those measured by radioimmunoassay, which resulted in decreased aldosterone-to-renin ratios. Subsequently, positive results of the captopril challenge test based on radioimmunoassay turned into "negative" based on the novel assay in 45% patients with primary aldosteronism, using the conventional cut-off value (aldosterone-to-renin activity ratio > 20 ng/dL per ng/mL/h). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that aldosterone-to-renin activity ratios > 8.2 ng/dL per ng/mL/h in the novel assay was compatible with the conventional diagnosis (sensitivity, 0.874; specificity, 0.980). Our study indicates the great measurement accuracy of the novel chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for aldosterone, and the importance of measurement-adjusted cut-offs in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

A 120-Minute Saline Infusion Test for the Confirmation of Primary Aldosteronism: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The saline infusion test (SIT) to confirm primary aldosteronism requires infusing 2 L of normal saline over 240 minutes. Previous studies raised concerns regarding increased blood pressure and worsening hypokalemia during SIT. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic applicability of a SIT that requires 1 L of saline infusion over 120 minutes. METHODS: A cross-sectional study, including all patients in a large medical center who underwent SIT from 1 January 2015 to 30 April 2023. Blood samples were drawn for baseline renin and aldosterone (t = 0) after 2 hours (t = 120 min) and after 4 hours (t = 240 min) of saline infusion. We used ROC analysis to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of various aldosterone cut-off values at t = 120 to confirm primary aldosteronism. RESULTS: The final analysis included 62 patients. A ROC analysis yielded 97% specificity and 90% sensitivity for a plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) of 397 pmol/L (14 ng/dL) at t = 120 to confirm primary aldosteronism, and an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% CI [0.93, 1.00], P < 0.001). Almost half (44%) of the patients did not suppress PAC below 397 pmol/L (14 ng/dL) at t = 120. Of them, only one (4%) patient suppressed PAC below 276 pmol/L (10 ng/dL) at t = 240. Mean systolic blood pressure increased from 140.1 ±â€…21.3 mm Hg at t = 0 to 147.6 ±â€…14.5 mm Hg at t = 240 (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: A PAC of 397 pmol/L (14 ng/dL) at t = 120 has high sensitivity and specificity for primary aldosteronism confirmation.

Establishment of qualitative human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleic acid amplification test as an adjunct confirmatory test in low-prevalence areas and small- and medium-sized diagnostic laboratories.

Two simple and inexpensive in-house qualitative human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleotide amplification tests (HIV-1 NATs) were established as adjunct confirmatory HIV test for HIV antigen (Ag)-positive specimens identified from HIV screening test and for patients with indeterminate or negative HIV antibody (Ab) confirmatory test results. The limit of detection was <1000 copies/mL, which is lower than that of the HIV Ag/Ab combination assay. One test using QL1 detected all 11 HIV-1 subtypes/circulating recombinant forms/group samples with almost equal analytical sensitivity, and the other test, using QL2, also detected all, except for two group O samples. In the examination of 28 HIV-1 Ag-positive samples using Determine HIV Early Detect, 27 samples were reactive and one HIV-1 Ag-pseudo-positive sample was non-reactive using both methods. These in-house qualitative HIV-1 NATs are useful for confirming HIV-1 Ag-positive cases and excluding HIV-1 Ag false-positive cases in areas with low HIV prevalence and small- and medium-sized diagnostic laboratories.

Brief communication: comparison the diagnostic performance of four HBsAg ELISA kits.

BACKGROUND: Comparison of diagnostic efficiency of four ELISA kits for determining HBsAg. METHODS: Collecting 348 serum samples from clinical laboratory of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University without specific gender and age requirements, determining HBsAg by the four ELISA kits, simultaneously. Confirmatory test was carried out when the initial results are positive. RESULTS: 329 out of 348 samples results were consistent (94.5%), 152 out of 329 were positive, and 177 out of 329 were negative, and all the positive results can be confirmed; 19 samples were not consistent (5.5%), and only 1 sample was confirmed by the confirmatory test. After calculation, the diagnostic efficiencies of the four ELISA kits (Beijing Wantai, Xiamen Xinchuang, Zhuhai Lizhu, and Shanghai Kehua) were 98.6%, 98.0%, 99.7%, and 97.4%, respectively, the sensitivities were 100%, 99.4%, 99.4%, and 100%, respectively, the specificities were 97.5%, 96.9%, 100%, and 95.4%, respectively, the false positive rates were 2.5%, 3.1%, 0, and 4.6%, respectively, and the false negative rates were 0, 0.6%, 0.6%, and 0, respectively. All the initial absorbencies of the false positive samples were less than 1.0. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic efficiency of Lizhu is the highest, while Kehua is the lowest. False positive or false negative results would take place in any of the kits, an HBsAg confirmatory test is essential for initially positive samples, especially with absorbance <1.0, because it can exclude most false positives.

Phenotypic characterization of ESBL producing Enterobacter cloacae among children.

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of ESBL producing Enterobacter cloacae in clinical isolates is posing a serious threat for treating nosocomial infections. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacter cloacae and to compare the phenotypic methods used for the characterization of ESBL producing strains. METHODOLOGY: This cross sectional observational study was conducted during April 2011 to March 2012 at Microbiology department of The Children's Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore. A total number of 20,257 various clinical samples were analyzed during the study period. Enterobacter cloacae were identified using API 20E system and ESBL detection was carried out using double-disk synergy test (DDST) and CLSI confirmatory test. RESULTS: Enterobacter cloacae were isolated from 221 samples, out of which 33 (14.93%) were ESBL producers and 188 (85.07%) were non-ESBL producers. The gender distribution of ESBL producing Enterobacter cloacae was 21 (63.6%) in males and 12 (36.4%) in females. Highest frequency (63%) of ESBL producing Enterobacter cloacae was detected in blood samples. Comparison of DDST and CLSI confirmatory test showed that 25 (75.75%) isolates were characterized by DDST and 33 (100%) using CLSI confirmatory test. CONCLUSION: The present study shows moderately high frequency of ESBL producing Enterobacter cloacae among children. DDST was found to be less efficient in ESBL detection as compared to CLSI confirmatory test.

Efficacy of Oral Furosemide Test for Primary Aldosteronism Diagnosis.

Context: Confirmatory tests represent a fundamental step in primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosis, but they are laborious and often require a hospital environment due to the risks involved. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of oral furosemide as a new confirmatory test for PA diagnosis. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of 80 mg of oral furosemide in 64 patients with PA and 22 with primary hypertension (controls). Direct renin concentration (DRC) was measured before, and 2 hours and 3 hours after the oral furosemide. In addition, the oral furosemide test was compared with 2 other confirmatory tests: the furosemide upright test (FUT) and saline infusion test (SIT) or captopril challenge test (CCT) in all patients with PA. Results: The cut-off of 7.6 µU/mL for DRC at 2 hours after oral furosemide had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 82%, and accuracy of 90% for PA diagnosis. In 5 out of 6 controls with low-renin hypertension, which might represent a PA spectrum, renin remained suppressed. Excluding these 6 controls with low-renin hypertension, the DRC cut-off of 10 µU/mL at 2 hours after oral furosemide had a sensitivity of 95.3%, specificity of 93.7% and accuracy of 95% for PA diagnosis. DRC after 3 hours of oral furosemide did not improve diagnostic performance. Using the cut-off of 10 µU/mL, the oral furosemide test and the FUT were concordant in 62 out of 64 (97%) patients with PA. Only 4 out of 64 cases with PA (6.4%) ended the oral furosemide test with potassium <3.5 mEq/L. Hypotension was not evidenced in any patient with PA during the test. Conclusion: The oral furosemide test was safe, well-tolerated and represents an effective strategy for PA investigation.

Can bispectral index be an early marker in the diagnosis of brain death?

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of brain death is a clinical condition in which it is difficult to perform confirmatory tests due to the ineligible clinical status of the patient. Prior to confirmatory tests, the use of a BIS monitor to determine the time of brain death is important for organ transplants, cost-effectiveness and reducing stressful wait of the family. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use BIS monitoring for early detection of brain death. METHODS: BIS monitoring was performed in 12 patients who were clinically diagnosed with brain death in our intensive care unit during a two-year period. RESULTS: All patients had diffuse brain injury. The BIS score was zero in all patients. However, two patients could not be legally diagnosed with brain death because confirmatory tests could not be performed due to the clinical status. In one patient, the BIS score was zero and blood flow was present on the first computed tomography angiography of the brain; however, the cerebral blood flow was absent on the second imaging after two days. CONCLUSION: It was believed that BIS monitoring could be a parameter to use for detection of brain death in patients with severe brain injury. However, future research is needed in this regard.

Captopril challenge test in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism: consistency between 1- and 2- h sampling.

Objective: To examine the consistency of plasma aldosterone concentration at 1 and 2 h in the captopril challenge test (CCT) and to explore the possibility of replacing 2-h aldosterone concentration with 1-h aldosterone concentration for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA). Methods: This retrospective analysis included a total of 204 hypertensive patients suspected of having PA. Subjects received oral captopril challenge at 50 mg (25 mg if the systolic blood pressure was <120 mmHg), and plasma aldosterone concentration and direct renin concentration were measured at 1 and 2 h afterward (chemiluminescence immunoassay Liaison® DiaSorin, Italy). Sensitivity and specificity were used to reflect the diagnostic performance of 1-h aldosterone concentration using 2-h aldosterone concentration (11 ng/dl as the cutoff) as the reference. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was also conducted. Results: Among the 204 included patients [median age of 57.0 (48.0-61.0) years, 54.4% men], a diagnosis of PA was established in 94 patients. Aldosterone concentration in the patients with essential hypertension was 8.40 (interquartile range 7.05-11.00) ng/dl at 1 h and 7.65 (5.98-9.30) ng/dl at 2 h (P < 0.001). In patients with PA, aldosterone concentration was 16.80 (12.58-20.50) ng/dl at 1 h and 15.55 (12.60-20.85) ng/dl at 2 h (P > 0.999). At a cutoff of 11 ng/dl, the sensitivity and specificity of using 1-h aldosterone concentration to diagnose PA were 87.2% and 78.2%, respectively. A higher cutoff of 12.5 ng/ml increased specificity to 90.0% but decreased sensitivity to 75.5%. A lower cutoff of 9.3 ng/ml increased sensitivity to 97.9% but decreased specificity to 65.4%. Conclusions: When diagnosing PA with CCT, 1-h aldosterone concentration could not be used to replace 2-h aldosterone concentration.

Quarantine Disinfestation of Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) Using Gamma and X-rays Irradiation.

Paracoccus marginatus is a highly polyphagous invasive pest that poses a significant quarantine threat to tropical and subtropical countries. Infested commodities in international trade should undergo phytosanitary treatment, and irradiation is recommended as a viable alternative to replace methyl bromide fumigation. Dose-response tests were conducted on the 2-, 4-, and 6-day-old eggs and gravid females of P. marginatus using the X-ray radiation doses of 15-105 Gy with an interval of 15 Gy. Radiotolerance was compared using ANOVA, fiducial overlapping and lethal dose ratio (LDR) test, resulting in no significant difference among treatments, except for the overall mortality and LDR at LD90 (a dose causing 90% mortality at 95% confidence level). The estimated dose for LD99.9968 was 176.5-185.2 Gy, which was validated in the confirmatory tests. No nymphs emerged from a total of 60,386 gravid females exposed to a gamma radiation dose range of 146.8-185.0 Gy in the confirmatory tests. The largest dose in confirmatory tests should be the minimum threshold for phytosanitary treatment, consequently, a minimum dose of 185 Gy is recommended for the phytosanitary irradiation treatment of papaya mealybug-infested commodities, ensuring a treatment efficacy of ≥99.9950% at 95% confidence level.