Developmental outcomes of children born through ICSI versus conventional IVF (cIVF) in couples with non-male factor infertility.

STUDY QUESTION: In non-male factor infertile couples, are there any differences in the developmental outcomes between children born through ICSI and conventional IVF (cIVF)? SUMMARY ANSWER: In this preliminary study, ICSI and cIVF seem to have a comparable effect on developmental outcomes after 12 months in children born to non-male factor infertile couples. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ICSI, an invasive technique, has raised concerns about potential developmental abnormalities in children. Limited data are available regarding the developmental outcomes of ICSI-conceived infants born to non-male factor infertile couples. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective cohort study involved a follow-up of all children aged 12 months or older who were born from pregnancies resulting from either ICSI or cIVF as part of a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) (NCT03428919). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In the original RCT, 1064 women were randomly assigned to the ICSI or cIVF groups (532 women for each group). Follow-up was conducted with 155 couples (195 children) in the ICSI group and 141 couples (185 children) in the cIVF group. The Vietnamese version of the Ages & Stages Third Edition Questionnaires (ASQ-3) and the Development Red Flags questionnaires were completed by the participants. A total of 141 (90.1%) women (177 children) in the ICSI group and 113 (80.1%) women (145 children) in the cIVF group returned fully completed questionnaires. The primary outcomes were the developmental outcomes based on responses to the ASQ-3 and the Red Flags questionnaire. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The mean age of children at follow-up was 19.5 ± 5.0 months in the ICSI group and 19.3 ± 5.5 months in the cIVF group. The mean height and weight of children in both groups were similar. The overall proportion of children with any abnormal ASQ-3 score did not differ significantly between the ICSI and cIVF groups (16.9% vs 13.1%, P = 0.34). The proportion of children with Red Flag signs was also comparable between the two groups (6.2% vs 9.2%, P = 0.36, ICSI vs cIVF, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Despite a reasonably high follow-up response rate, there is a potential risk of sampling bias, and overall, the number of children with developmental abnormalities was very small. The study relied solely on questionnaires as screening tools, rather than incorporating additional behavioral observations or physical developmental tests; this may have affected the statistical power and the significance of between-group comparisons. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The current findings contribute to the existing evidence and support the comparative safety of ICSI and cIVF regarding early childhood development. However, more extensive and prolonged follow-up data for these children are needed to draw definitive conclusions. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was received for this study, and no authors reported conflicting interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04866524 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Conventional in vitro fertilisation rather than intracytoplasmic sperm injection when only one oocyte is retrieved: Time to overcome irrational fears.

BACKGROUND: The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) currently extends beyond male factor infertility, notably replacing conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in scenarios like limited oocyte availability, where it is used as a precaution against complete fertilisation failure. While existing studies on the use of conventional IVF in such situations provide some reassurance, the available evidence is somewhat insufficient and ICSI is commonly used. AIMS: To evaluate whether conventional IVF can be a feasible option when only one oocyte is retrieved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the fertilisation rate with conventional IVF in women retrieving only one oocyte and whose partner had normal semen. The study aimed at evaluating whether the fertilisation rate was aligned with the threshold indicated by recognized IVF laboratory performance indicators (Vienna Consensus). Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 304 cycles with a single oocyte inseminated with conventional IVF, 209 achieved normal fertilisation and 82 did not. Thirteen had no mature oocytes. The fertilisation rate was 69% (95% CI: 63-74%) and increased to 72% (95% CI: 66-77%) when immature oocytes were excluded. The fertilisation rate surpassed the minimum competency threshold of the Vienna Consensus (60%), even if below the benchmark value (75%). Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per oocyte retrieval were 10% and 8%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses failed to identify any predictive factor of fertilisation. CONCLUSION: Conventional IVF with one oocyte met Vienna Consensus standards even if it fell short of higher benchmarks.

Effect of noninvasive embryo viability testing versus conventional IVF on the live birth rate in IVF/ICSI patients: a study protocol for a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was demonstrated to be superior to conventional IVF in reducing the incidence of miscarriage and abnormal offspring after the first embryo transfer (ET). PGT-A requires several embryo trophectoderm cells, but its negative impacts on embryo development and long-term influence on the health conditions of conceived children have always been a concern. As an alternative, noninvasive PGT-A (niPGT-A) approaches using spent blastocyst culture medium (SBCM) achieved comparable accuracy with PGT-A in several pilot studies. The main objective of this study is to determine whether noninvasive embryo viability testing (niEVT) results in better clinical outcomes than conventional IVF after the first embryo transfer. Furthermore, we further investigated whether niEVT results in higher the live birth rate between women with advanced maternal age (AMA, > 35 years old) and young women or among patients for whom different fertilization protocols are adopted. METHODS: This study will be a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) studying patients of different ages (20-43 years) undergoing different fertilization protocols (in vitro fertilization [IVF] or intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI]). We will enroll 1140 patients at eight reproductive medical centers over 24 months. Eligible patients should have at least two good-quality blastocysts (better than grade 4 CB). The primary outcome will be the live birth rate of the first embryo transfer (ET). Secondary outcomes will include the clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, cumulative live birth rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and time to pregnancy. DISCUSSION: In this study, patients who undergo noninvasive embryo viability testing (niEVT) will be compared to women treated by conventional IVF. We will determine the effects on the pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate and adverse events. We will also investigate whether there is any difference in clinical outcomes among patients with different ages and fertilization protocols (IVF/ICSI). This trial will provide clinical evidence of the effect of noninvasive embryo viability testing on the clinical outcomes of the first embryo transfer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) Identifier: ChiCTR2100051408. 9 September 2021.

Conventional IVF is feasible in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of the application of conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF) for couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) with non-male factor infertility. METHODS: To evaluate the efficiency of sperm whole-genome amplification (WGA), spermatozoa were subjected to three WGA protocols: Picoplex, ChromInst, and multiple displacement amplification (MDA). In the clinical studies, 641 couples who underwent PGT-A treatment for frozen embryos between January 2016 and December 2021 were included to retrospectively compare the chromosomal and clinical outcomes of cIVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Twenty-six couples were prospectively recruited for cIVF and PGT-A treatment between April 2021 and April 2022; parental contamination was analyzed in biopsied samples; and 12 aneuploid embryos were donated to validate the PGT-A results. RESULTS: Sperm DNA failed to amplify under Picoplex and ChromInst conditions but could be amplified using MDA. In frozen PGT-A cycles, no significant differences in the average rates of euploid, mosaic, and aneuploid embryos per cycle between the cIVF-PGT-A and ICSI-PGT-A groups were observed. The results of the prospective study that recruited couples for cIVF-PGT-A treatment showed no paternal contamination and one case of maternal contamination in 150 biopsied trophectoderm samples. Among the 12 donated embryos with whole-chromosome aneuploidy, 11 (91.7%) presented uniform chromosomal aberrations, which were in agreement with the original biopsy results. CONCLUSIONS: Under the Picoplex and ChromInst WGA protocols, the risk of parental contamination in the cIVF-PGT-A cycles was low. Therefore, applying cIVF to couples with non-male factor infertility who are undergoing PGT-A is feasible.

Development and validation of a conventional in vitro total fertilization failure prediction model.

BACKGROUND: Conventional total fertilization failure (TFF) is a challenging problem for clinicians. The predictive model developed in this study aims to predict the individual probability of conventional in vitro total fertilization failure. METHODS: The prediction model was developed based on 1635 patients who underwent first-attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles from January 2018 to January 2020. Total fertilization failure and normal fertilization occurred in 218 and 1417 cycles, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to develop the prediction model. Performance of our model was evaluated using calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]). RESULTS: Thirteen risk factors for TFF were included in the prediction model, as follows: female age; female body mass index; infertility duration; number of oocytes retrieved; stimulation protocol; infertility etiology; infertility diagnosis; male age; sperm concentration; total sperm motility; normal sperm morphology percentage; swim-up sperm motility; and swim-up sperm concentration. The AUC of our model was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.783-0.846), indicating satisfactory discrimination performance. CONCLUSION: Considering female and male factors (especially sperm parameters), we established a model that predicts the probability of TFF in conventional IVF procedures that will be helpful in the laboratory supporting IVF to facilitate physicians in determining optimal treatment.

Conventional IVF performs similarly in women with and without endometriosis.

PURPOSE: A reduced oocyte competence has been claimed as one of the factors underlying infertility in women with endometriosis. This idea has justified the hypothesis that intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), rather than conventional IVF (c-IVF), may overcome oocyte impairment and ensure better assisted reproduction technology (ART) outcomes; however, data from the literature are controversial. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare ART success rates following (c-IVF) between women with and without endometriosis in the presence of normozoospermic partners. METHODS: This is a retrospective, matched case-control study of 314 patients who underwent c-IVF cycles between January 2014 and December 2020. Women with endometriosis were matched in a 1:1 ratio with patients undergoing ART for other indications, considering age (± 6 months), number of oocytes retrieved (± 1), and study period. The main outcome measures included total fertilization failure, fertilization rate, embryo quality, cumulative clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. RESULTS: The fertilization rate and the proportion of women with total fertilization failure did not differ between women with and without endometriosis. Similarly, all other embryological variables did not also differ, except for the number of top-quality cleavage stage embryos which was higher in the endometriosis group. Cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar between women with and without endometriosis. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of endometriosis does not negatively affect the performance of c-IVF; thus, c-IVF can be efficiently used in women affected, unless a male factor is also involved. This issue holds clinical relevance to help operators on their insemination technique decision-making.

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for conventional IVF blastocysts.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested that non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT) for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) blastocysts can be used to identify chromosomal ploidy and chromosomal abnormalities. Here, we report the feasibility and performance of niPGT for conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) blastocysts. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. In the preclinical stage, whole genome amplification and NGS were performed using the sperm spent culture medium (SCM). Then, trophectoderm (TE) biopsies and corresponding SCM derived from 27 conventional IVF monopronuclear embryos were collected. In the clinical stage, samples from 25 conventional IVF cycles and 37 ICSI cycles from April 2020-August 2021 were collected for performance evaluation. RESULTS: Preclinically, we confirmed failed sperm DNA amplification under the current amplification system. Subsequent niPGT from the 27 monopronuclear blastocysts showed 69.2% concordance with PGT results of corresponding TE biopsies. In the clinical stage, no paternal contamination was observed in any of the 161 SCM samples from conventional IVF. While maternal contamination was observed in 29.8% (48/161) SCM samples, only 2.5% (4/161) samples had a contamination ratio ≥ 50%. Compared with that of TE biopsy, the performances of NiPGT from 161 conventional IVF embryos and 122 ICSI embryos were not significantly different (P > 0.05), with ploidy concordance rates of 75% and 74.6% for IVF and ICSI methods, respectively. Finally, evaluation of the euploid probability of embryos with different types of niPGT results showed prediction probabilities of 82.8%, 77.8%, 62.5%, 50.0%, 40.9% and 18.4% for euploidy, sex-chromosome mosaics only, low-level mosaics, multiple abnormal chromosomes, high-level mosaics and aneuploidy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our research results preliminarily confirm that the niPGT approach using SCM from conventional IVF has comparable performance with ICSI and might broadening the application scope of niPGT.

The role of ICSI vs. conventional IVF for patients with advanced maternal age-a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the treatment of non-male factor infertile patients aged ≥ 39. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, between March 2018 and December 2019. Sixty-nine patients were recruited, and sixty patients participated in the study. Their ovaries were randomized prior to the beginning of the ovarian stimulation: the oocytes from one side (n = 257) were allocated to the ICSI (ICSI arm), while those of the contralateral side (n = 258) were allocated to conventional insemination (IVF arm). The fertilization rate per oocyte retrieved, number of zygotes (2PN), and cleavage-stage embryos were assessed and compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: The average number of zygotes (3.1 vs. 2.7 p = 0.45), the fertilization rate (72.4% vs. 65.1% p = 0.38), the average number of cleavage-stage (2.8 vs. 2.4 p = 0.29), and the average top-quality embryos (TQE) cleavage-stage embryos (1.7 vs. 1.6 p = 0.94) were comparable between the two groups. The TQE rate per randomized oocyte (41.2% vs. 41% p = 0.8) was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI does not improve the reproductive outcomes of advanced-age patients undergoing conventional insemination for non-male factor infertility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03370068.

Serum and follicular fluid fetuin-B levels are correlated with fertilization rates in conventional IVF cycles.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between serum/follicular fluid fetuin-B levels and fertilization outcomes in conventional IVF cycles. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of conventional IVF treatments including 78 cycles with low fertilization rates (two pronuclei [2PN] rate < 30%; LF group) and 104 cycles performed during the same period with 2PN rate > 70% (high fertilization group, HF). To calculate the required sample size, a two-sample t test power analysis was applied to data from our pilot study, using PASS 11.0 software. Fetuin-B was measured using a commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Serum fetuin-B and follicular fluid fetuin-B were positively correlated (r = 0.703, P < 0.001). Compared to the HF group, the LF group had significantly lower levels of fetuin-B, both in serum (5.81 ± 1.53 vs. 7.19 ± 1.42, P < 0.001) and follicular fluid (5.06 ± 1.29 vs. 6.16 ± 1.52, P < 0.001). The serum fetuin-B level from cycles with polypronuclear (PPN) zygotes was significantly lower when compared to cycles without PPN zygotes (6.82 ± 1.65 vs. 6.10 ± 1.43, P = 0.006). However, serum fetuin-B level was not correlated with preimplantation embryo development or clinical pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Serum fetuin-B level is correlated with fertilization rate in conventional IVF and it may be used as a predictive marker of fertilization in IVF treatment.

Embryological outcomes in cycles with human oocytes containing large tubular smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters after conventional in vitro fertilization.

There have been no studies analyzing the effect of large aggregates of tubular smooth endoplasmic reticulum (aSERT) after conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF). The aim of this study was to investigate whether aSERT can be identified after cIVF and the association between the embryological outcomes of oocytes in cycles with aSERT. This is a retrospective study examining embryological data from cIVF cycles showing the presence of aSERT in oocytes 5-6 h after cIVF. To evaluate embryo quality, cIVF cycles with at least one aSERT-metaphase II (MII) oocyte observed (cycles with aSERT) were compared to cycles with normal-MII oocytes (control cycles). Among the 4098 MII oocytes observed in 579 cycles, aSERT was detected in 100 MII oocytes in 51 cycles (8.8%). The fertilization rate, the rate of embryo development on day 3 and day 5-6 did not significantly differ between cycles with aSERT and control group. However, aSERT-MII oocytes had lower rates for both blastocysts and good quality blastocysts (p < 0.05). aSERT can be detected in the cytoplasm by removing the cumulus cell 5 h after cIVF. However, aSERT-MII oocytes do not affect other normal-MII oocytes in cycles with aSERT.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization in unexplained infertility.

Objective: To compare cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and cost-effectiveness of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) vs. conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF). Design: Retrospective cohort study of cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System. Setting: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member IVF clinics in the United States. Patients: Patients with unexplained infertility who underwent first autologous retrieval cycles between January 2017 and December 2019 with linked fresh and frozen embryo transfers through December 2021. Interventions: ICSI vs. cIVF. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was CLBR, defined as ≤1 live birth from a retrieval cycle and all linked embryo transfers. Secondary outcomes included two pronuclear (2PN) per oocyte retrieved, miscarriage rate, and total number of transferred or frozen embryos per 2PN. Subsamples with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were analyzed. Outcomes were adjusted for age, body mass index, number of oocytes retrieved, length of follow-up, and clinic ICSI use rate. Results: A total of 18,805 patients with unexplained infertility were included. No difference in CLBR was found among cycles without genetic testing (54.4% ICSI vs. 57.5% cIVF) and with PGT-A (47.6% ICSI vs. 51.8% cIVF). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles without genetic testing had a higher miscarriage rate (16.4% vs. 14.4%) but no difference was seen in cycles with PGT-A (13.9% ICSI vs. 13.2% cIVF). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles had a significantly lower ratio of 2PN per oocyte retrieved without genetic testing (59.7% vs. 60.9%) and with PGT-A (63.3% vs. 65.8%). The ratio of embryos transferred or frozen per 2PN was not significantly different in cycles without genetic testing (49.4% vs. 49.6%) or with PGT-A (54.2% vs. 55.2%). Total fertilization failure occurred in 216 patients (4%) who underwent cIVF and in 153 patients (1.1%) who used ICSI.Compared with cIVF alone, an estimated additional $11,011,500 was charged to patients for ICSI without genetic testing and $9,010,500 was charged to patients for ICSI with PGT-A over 2 years by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics. On the basis of total fertilization failure rates, 35 patients would require treatment with routine ICSI to avoid a single cycle of total fertilization failure with cIVF. Conclusions: Routine use of ICSI in unexplained infertility is not warranted due to the additional cost and lack of CLBR benefit.

Feasibility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on frozen-thawed embryos following conventional IVF insemination.

Objective: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is commonly employed in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to minimize the risk of foreign sperm DNA contamination. Cryopreserved embryos from patients with recurrent miscarriage or repeated implantation failure, who have undergone conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF), can be thawed and biopsied for PGT. Therefore, we aimed to assess the accuracy and effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on frozen embryos using conventional IVF (c-IVF) insemination methods. Methods: From January 2021 to November 2023, our center conducted 107 thawed cryopreserved embryo biopsy cycles to screen for PGT-A. Among them, 58 cycles used c-IVF insemination, and 49 used ICSI insemination. Basic patient clinical information, laboratory data, PGT test results, and clinical outcome data were collected. To minimize the confounding effects of patient characteristics and embryo quality on PGT-A outcomes, clinical outcomes, and contamination assessment, these variables were included in the analysis. We then evaluated the blastocyst euploidy rate, clinical outcomes, and accuracy of PGT-A results between the two groups and analyzed potential contamination in the c-IVF insemination group. Results: A total of 320 blastocysts underwent PGT-A testing, with 179 blastocysts from c-IVF insemination and 141 from ICSI insemination. Considering participants' baseline characteristics and embryological outcomes, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding infertility type, average age, body mass index, percentage of PGT-A indications, or quality of embryonic development. Regarding PGT-A results, all 320 biopsy samples were successfully analyzed, showing no statistical variance in chromosomal euploidy, abnormality, or mosaicism rates between the two insemination methods. No parental contamination was detected in the c-IVF insemination group. When assessing clinical outcomes, parameters such as biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates did not exhibit significant discrepancies between the two groups, and no misdiagnoses were reported during the study period. Conclusion: Embryo transfer and PGT-A results are not affected by potential parental contamination in frozen-thawed embryos conceived via c-IVF. PGT-A guided embryo transfer in thawed embryos conceived by c-IVF is a viable and clinically effective approach.

Oocyte degeneration in a cohort adversely affects clinical outcomes in conventional IVF cycles: a propensity score matching study.

Background: Oocyte degeneration was mostly described in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles; there is no report showing the relationship between oocyte degeneration and clinical outcomes in conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. This retrospective study using the propensity score (PS) matching method aimed to explore whether the presence of oocyte degeneration in conventional IVF cycles would affect the sibling embryo development potential and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients with at least one oocyte degenerated after short-term insemination and stripping were defined as the degeneration (DEG) group, while patients with no oocyte degenerated were defined as the non-degeneration (NONDEG) group. The PS matching method was used to control for potential confounding factors, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was made to evaluate whether the presence of oocyte degeneration would affect the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Results: After PS matching, basic characteristics were similar between the two groups, oocyte yield was significantly higher in the DEG group than the NON-DEG group (P < 0.05), mature oocyte number, 2 pronuclear (2PN) embryo number, 2PN embryo clearage rate, "slow" embryo number, "accelerated" embryo number, rate of cycles with total day 3 embryo extended culture, number of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, transferred embryo stage, transferred embryo number, and live birth rate in fresh embryo transfer cycles were all similar between the two groups (P > 0.05), but the 2PN fertilization rate, available embryo number, high-quality embryo number, "normal" embryo number, frozen embryo number, blastocyst formation rate, and no available embryo cycle rate were all significantly lower in the DEG group than the NON-DEG group (P < 0.05). The cumulative live birth rate was also significantly lower in the DEG group than in the NON-DEG group (70.2% vs. 74.0%, P = 0.0019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis further demonstrated that the presence of oocyte degeneration in conventional IVF cycles adversely affects the CLBR both before (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.92) and after (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93) PS matching. Conclusion: Our findings together revealed that the presence of oocyte degeneration in a cohort of oocytes may adversely affect subsequent embryo development potential and clinical outcomes in conventional IVF cycles.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection does not improve the outcome of IVF treatments in patients with advanced maternal age or low oocyte number: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was introduced to achieve fertilization in cases of severe male factor infertility. However, ICSI is often used in cases of non-male factor infertility, such as advanced maternal age or low oocyte number, but the clinical benefit of the method in these indications has not been proven. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted in a university clinic between 2018 and 2020. Patients with ≥40 years of age and/or ≤4 oocytes with non-sever male factor infertility were randomized into conventional IVF or ICSI groups. Fertilization rate, embryo quality, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were compared. RESULTS: A total of 336 IVF cycles (169 conventional IVF and 167 ICSI) were involved in the study. The fertilization rate was higher in the conventional IVF group compared to the ICSI group (IVF: 61.7%, ICSI: 53.4%, P=0.001). Embryo development and morphology did not show considerable difference between groups. Implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate were 13.1%, 24.3% and 11.4% in the conventional IVF and 10.4%, 19.0%, 12.0% in the ICSI group. The differences were not significant. Subgroup analysis showed a significantly better clinical outcome following conventional IVF when advanced maternal age was accompanied by low oocyte number (Implantation: 11.7% vs 2.6%, P=0.027; Clinical pregnancy: 18.5% vs 4%, P=0.020). DISCUSSION: A significantly higher fertilization rate, a tendency for higher clinical pregnancy rate was found in conventional IVF treatments compared to ICSI. When advanced maternal age was associated with low oocyte number, ICSI resulted in a substantially lower chance of fertilization and clinical pregnancy. These data suggest that ICSI offers no advantage over conventional IVF in terms of fertilization, embryo quality, implantation and pregnancy rates for couples with advanced maternal age or with low oocyte number.

Effectivity of conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) when male factor is absent: a perspective point of view.

An objective and individualized approach of in vitro fertilization techniques tends to decrease costs and improve the experience of infertile couples during treatment. The use of available technologies to diagnose and treat infertility based on scientific evidence seems to be the best practice, which is the guideline that motivates this review on the available techniques for laboratory oocyte insemination. Conventional IVF, the pioneering technique, was initially used in the treatment of tubal obstruction infertility, successfully expanding the treatment of infertile couples presenting with several other factors. However, it was less effective in cases of severe male factor infertility. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, which was developed in 1992, proved to be the method of choice for treating couples with severe male factor infertility. Since then, it has been increasingly used regardless of the infertility factor. This review discusses the effectiveness of conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) when the male factor is absent in all aspects, as technical and clinical outcomes, associated risks, adjustments for using with other technologies and costs. Finally we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each one, with all aspects reviewed.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs. conventional in vitro fertilization in patients with non-male factor infertility.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) and cost effectiveness of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF) for non-male factor infertility. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics. PATIENT(S): A total of 46,967 patients with non-male factor infertility with the first autologous oocyte retrieval cycle between January 2014 and December 2015. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were CLBR, defined as up to 1 live birth from an autologous retrieval cycle between 2014 and 2015, and linked fresh and frozen embryo transfers through 2016. The secondary outcomes included miscarriage rate, 2 pronuclei per oocyte retrieved, and the total number of transferred and frozen embryos. Analyses were performed on subsamples with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). A cost analysis was performed to determine the costs accrued by ICSI. RESULT(S): Among cycles without PGT-A in patients with non-male factor infertility, the CLBR was 60.9% for ICSI cycles vs. 64.3% for cIVF cycles, a difference that was not significantly different after adjustment for covariates (adjusted risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.00). With PGT-A, no difference in CLBR was found between ICSI and cIVF cases after adjustment (64.7% vs. 69.0%, respectively; adjusted risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.01). The patients were charged an estimated additional amount of $37,476,000 for ICSI without genetic testing and an additional amount of $7,213,500 for ICSI with PGT-A over 2 years by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics. CONCLUSION(S): In patients with non-male factor infertility, ICSI did not improve CLBR. Given the additional cost and the lack of CLBR benefit, our data show that the routine use of ICSI in patients with non-male factor infertility is not warranted.

The aneuploidy testing of blastocysts developing from 0PN and 1PN zygotes in conventional IVF through TE-biopsy PGT-A and minimally invasive PGT-A.

Zygotes without a pronuclear (0PN) or with one pronuclear (1PN) were defined as abnormal fertilization in conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF). The removal of 0PN and 1PN zygotes from conventional IVF cycles has always been controversial. This study aimed to investigate the chromosomal aneuploidy rates of 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts in conventional IVF cycles and to assess the concordance rate between TE-biopsy PGT-A and miPGT-A. TE biopsies and culture media with blastocoel fluid (CM-BF) samples were whole-genome amplified by multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle-based single-cell ChromInst method. Next generation sequencing was performed for comprehensive chromosomal screening on a NextSeq550 sequencer using the NextSeq 500/550 High Output kit v2. The aneuploidy rates of 0PN-derived blastocysts were 19.7% for TE-biopsy PGT-A, and 36.1% for miPGT-A; the concordance rate for ploidy was 77.0%; and the sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 75.5%, respectively. The aneuploidy rates of 1PN-derived blastocysts were 37.5% and 37.5% by TE-biopsy PGT-A and miPGT-A, respectively; the concordance rate between TE biopsies and CM-BF samples was 83.3%; and the sensitivity and specificity were 77.8% and 86.7%, respectively. Regarding TE-biopsy PGT-A, there were no significant differences in aneuploidy rates among 0PN-, 1PN- and 2PN-derived blastocysts (PGT-M cycles) (19.7% vs. 37.5% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.226), but the aneuploidy rate of 1PN-derived blastocysts was slightly higher than the other two groups. An increase in aneuploidy rates was observed for 0PN/1PN-derived day 6 blastocysts compared to 0PN/1PN-derived day 5 blastocysts (TE-biopsy PGT-A: 35.7% vs. 19.3%, P = 0.099; miPGT-A: 39.3% vs. 35.1%, P = 0.705). The present study is the first that contributes to understanding the chromosomal aneuploidies in 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts in conventional IVF cycles using TE-biopsy PGT-A and miPGT-A. The clinical application value of 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts in conventional IVF should be assessed using TE-biopsy PGT-A or miPGT-A due to the existence of chromosomal aneuploidies.. In terms of consistency, the miPGT-A using blastocoel fluid enriched culture medium is promising as an alternative to TE-biopsy PGT-A for aneuploidy testing of 0PN- or 1PN-derived blastocysts in conventional IVF.

Machine-learning algorithm incorporating capacitated sperm intracellular pH predicts conventional in vitro fertilization success in normospermic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To measure human sperm intracellular pH (pHi) and develop a machine-learning algorithm to predict successful conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) in normospermic patients. DESIGN: Spermatozoa from 76 IVF patients were capacitated in vitro. Flow cytometry was used to measure sperm pHi, and computer-assisted semen analysis was used to measure hyperactivated motility. A gradient-boosted machine-learning algorithm was trained on clinical data and sperm pHi and membrane potential from 58 patients to predict successful conventional IVF, defined as a fertilization ratio (number of fertilized oocytes [2 pronuclei]/number of mature oocytes) greater than 0.66. The algorithm was validated on an independent set of data from 18 patients. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Normospermic men undergoing IVF. Patients were excluded if they used frozen sperm, had known male factor infertility, or used intracytoplasmic sperm injection only. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Successful conventional IVF. RESULT(S): Sperm pHi positively correlated with hyperactivated motility and with conventional IVF ratio (n = 76) but not with intracytoplasmic sperm injection fertilization ratio (n = 38). In receiver operating curve analysis of data from the test set (n = 58), the machine-learning algorithm predicted successful conventional IVF with a mean accuracy of 0.72 (n = 18), a mean area under the curve of 0.81, a mean sensitivity of 0.65, and a mean specificity of 0.80. CONCLUSION(S): Sperm pHi correlates with conventional fertilization outcomes in normospermic patients undergoing IVF. A machine-learning algorithm can use clinical parameters and markers of capacitation to accurately predict successful fertilization in normospermic men undergoing conventional IVF.

Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mild ovarian stimulation has emerged as an alternative to conventional IVF with the advantages of being more patient-friendly and less expensive. Inadequate data on pregnancy outcomes and concerns about the cycle cancellation rate (CCR) have prevented mild, or low-dose, IVF from gaining wide acceptance. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: To evaluate parallel-group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on IVF where comparisons were made between a mild (≤150 IU daily dose) and conventional stimulation in terms of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients described as poor, normal and non-polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) hyper-responders to IVF. SEARCH METHODS: Searches with no language restrictions were performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane central, Pre-Medicine from January 1990 until April 2020, using pre-specified search terms. References of included studies were hand-searched as well as advance access articles to key journals. Only parallel-group RCTs that used ≤150 IU daily dose of gonadotrophin as mild-dose IVF (MD-IVF) and compared with a higher conventional dose (CD-IVF) were included. Studies were grouped under poor, normal or hyper-responders as described by the authors in their inclusion criteria. Women with PCOS were excluded in the hyper-responder group. The risk of bias was assessed as per Cochrane Handbook for the included studies. The quality of evidence (QoE) was assessed according to the GRADE system. PRISMA guidance was followed for review methodology. OUTCOMES: A total of 31 RCTs were included in the analysis: 15 in the poor, 14 in the normal and 2 in the hyper-responder group. Live birth rates (LBRs) per randomisation were similar following use of MD-IVF in poor (relative risk (RR) 0.91 (CI 0.68, 1.22)), normal (RR 0.88 (CI 0.69, 1.12)) and hyper-responders (RR 0.98 (CI 0.79, 1.22)) when compared to CD-IVF. QoE was moderate. Cumulative LBRs (5 RCTs, n = 2037) also were similar in all three patient types (RR 0.96 (CI 0.86 1.07) (moderate QoE). Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly less with MD-IVF than CD-IVF in both normal (RR 0.22 (CI 0.10, 0.50)) and hyper-responders (RR 0.47 (CI 0.31, 0.72)), with moderate QoE. The CCRs were comparable in poor (RR 1.33 (CI 0.96, 1.85)) and hyper-responders (RR 1.31 (CI 0.98, 1.77)) but increased with MD-IVF among normal responders (RR 2.08 (CI 1.38, 3.14)); all low to very low QoE. Although fewer oocytes were retrieved and fewer embryos created with MD-IVF, the proportion of high-grade embryos was similar in all three population types (low QoE). Compared to CD-IVF, MD-IVF was associated with less gonadotrophin use and lower cost. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: This updated review provides reassurance on using MD-IVF not only for the LBR per cycle but also for the cumulative LBR, with moderate QoE. With risks identified with 'freeze-all' strategies, it may be time to recommend mild-dose ovarian stimulation for IVF for all categories of women i.e. hyper, poor and normal responders to IVF.

Comparing fertilization rates from intracytoplasmic sperm injection to conventional in vitro fertilization among women of advanced age with non-male factor infertility: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in improving fertilization rates compared to conventional in vitro fertilization rates (IVF) among women aged ≥38 years with a non-male factor diagnosis. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women aged ≥38 years with a non-male factor diagnosis receiving IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): A systematic review of databases including PubMed and Embase was performed. Study protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Studies were selected if they compared fertilization rates from ICSI with those from conventional IVF among women aged ≥38 years with a non-male factor infertility diagnosis. A random effects model was used. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were applied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization rate. RESULTS: Seven studies including 8796 retrieved oocytes (ICSI: 4,369; IVF: 4,427) with mean female age ≥38 years met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in fertilization rates between ICSI and conventional IVF (relative risk [RR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.06; P = .8). Heterogeneity was observed between studies (I2 = 58.2; P < .05). Heterogeneity was significant (I2 = 57.1; P < .05) when cycles with prior fertilization failure were excluded; however, when analysis was restricted to poor responders (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97-1.05; P = .6), heterogeneity was no longer significant (I2 = 0.0; P = .5). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in fertilization rates between conventional IVF and ICSI. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of ICSI in this population, controlling for other indications such as preimplantation genetic testing.