Risk Factors Associated with Cutaneous Reactions Following COVID-19 Vaccine Immunisation: A Registry-Based Case-Control Study.

Background: In Malaysia, following extensive COVID-19 vaccination, Hospital Kuala Lumpur reported an increase in cutaneous reactions post-immunisation. To understand this, a case-control study was initiated to identify potential risk factors. Methods: This registry-based, unmatched case-control study encompasses all adverse event following immunisation (AEFI) reports associated with COVID-19 vaccines, received by the Department of Pharmacy at Hospital Kuala Lumpur through the Malaysian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (MADRAC) AEFI reporting forms. Twenty-four potential risk factors were evaluated, including demographic information, medical history, food allergies, COVID-19 vaccination history and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, were evaluated using MADRAC AEFI reporting forms. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Cutaneous reactions were more frequent in middle-aged females, especially after the first COVID-19 vaccine dose. These reactions, primarily mild and generalised, included pruritus and urticaria. Notably, 52% were delayed reactions (more than 4 h post-vaccination). Factors associated with increased risk of cutaneous reaction following COVID-19 immunisation included history of seafood and shellfish allergy (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR]: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.12, 3.96; P = 0.020), history of vaccine allergy (adjOR: 4.07; 95% CI: 1.44, 11.54; P = 0.008), past dermatological diseases (adjOR: 5.48; 95% CI: 2.03, 14.78; P = 0.001), and past medication allergy (adjOR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.36, 3.31; P = 0.001). Conclusion: Self-reported histories of allergies to vaccines, foods or medications were found to increase the likelihood of cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. These reactions, which were predominantly mild, did not hinder the administration of the second vaccine dose. The majority of reactions occurred after the first dose, manifesting as generalised pruritus and urticaria. They were effectively managed with oral antihistamines and low-dose corticosteroids, thereby avoiding the need for hospitalisation.

Initiation Dose of Allopurinol and the Risk of Severe Cutaneous Reactions in Older Adults With CKD: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Allopurinol should be started at lower doses in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to avoid adverse effects. We examined the risk of severe cutaneous reactions in older adults with CKD who were newly prescribed allopurinol at varied doses. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study using linked health care databases. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients in Ontario, Canada (2008-2019) aged ≥66 years, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and who were new users of allopurinol. EXPOSURE: A new prescription for allopurinol >100 mg/d versus a dose ≤100 mg/d. OUTCOME: The primary outcome was a hospital visit with a severe cutaneous reaction within 180 days of starting allopurinol. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization and all-cause mortality. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: The exposure and referent groups were balanced on indicators of baseline health using inverse probability of treatment weighting on the propensity score. Weighted risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression and weighted risk differences (RD) using binomial regression. RESULTS: Of 47,315 patients (median age, 76 years; median eGFR, 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), 55% started allopurinol at >100 mg/d. Starting allopurinol at >100 versus ≤100 mg/d was associated with an increased risk of a severe cutaneous reaction: number of events (weighted), 103 of 25,802 (0.40%) versus 46 of 25,816 (0.18%), respectively (weighted RR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.50-3.37]; weighted RD, 0.22% [95% CI, 0.12%-0.32%]. Starting allopurinol at >100 versus ≤100 mg/d was associated with an increased risk of all-cause hospitalization but not with all-cause mortality. LIMITATIONS: This study was underpowered to detect risk differences in the association of allopurinol dose with outcomes across eGFR categories (ie, 45-59, 30-44, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with CKD who started allopurinol at >100 mg/d versus ≤100 mg/d were twice as likely to visit a hospital with a severe cutaneous reaction in the next 180 days.

Nilotinib-Induced Elephantine Psoriasis In a Patient With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are anticancer drugs that disrupt signal transduction pathways in protein kinases by different mechanisms. This group of pharmacologic agents has significantly improved the outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. However, their effect is not limited to cancer cells, and various complications, particularly cutaneous reactions, have been reported. We report a very rare case of a 35-year-old female with a history of chronic myeloid leukemia who presented with elephantine psoriasis after the treatment with nilotinib. Conclusions: This case highlights a critical side effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Awareness of this subject can be useful for better management of similar patients.

Erythema Multiforme Following Hepatitis A and Pneumococcal Vaccinations.

Erythema multiforme (EM) is a rare cell-mediated immune response characterized by target or iris patches or plaques that present symmetrically on the extremities. This condition may be associated with pruritus but is usually self-limited and spontaneously resolves within 5 weeks of onset; prodromal symptoms are rare. Several known cases have been linked to vaccination, but many vaccines used in pediatric care have been reported as causative agents of EM. This case study offers an association of EM following administration of the hepatitis A and pneumococcal vaccines.

Histopathological evaluation of cutaneous reactions to tattoos: Study at a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: Tattooing has been around for many years and is becoming an increasingly common fashion trend. As there are often few regulatory laws regarding the practice, an increase in the incidence of cutaneous reactions to tattoo inks is noted. These include allergic reactions, granulomatous dermatitis, infections, lichenoid dermatoses, and sometimes malignancy. The present study examines the histopathological changes seen in patients with cutaneous reactions to tattoo ink. METHOD: A prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months in the dermatology clinic of a tertiary care center in western India. The study population included 22 patients with cutaneous reactions over the tattoos. Punch biopsy specimens were sent to study the pattern of histopathological response. RESULTS: All 22 patients studied were between the ages of 17 and 35 years. The mean duration of development of reaction was 8.1 months. Most of the reactions were seen in black ink tattoos performed by amateurs. Perivascular and spongiotic dermatitis suggestive of allergic response was the most common feature on histopathology. Granulomatous response and lichenoid response were seen in five and three biopsies, respectively. CONCLUSION: Legalization is needed for this practice to prevent tattoo reactions. Histopathological evaluation is important as tattoo reactions may be associated with skin infections and malignancies.

Cutaneous reactions to pediatric cancer treatment: Part I. Conventional chemotherapy.

Chemotherapies often cause side effects of the skin, nails, and mucosal surfaces. These mucocutaneous toxicities contribute to morbidity and affect quality of life. Identification and management of these drug-induced eruptions is vital to allow for continuation of essential therapies. This review demonstrates the wide range of chemotherapy-induced cutaneous toxicities in children and includes clues for diagnosis as well as tips for counseling and management.

Drug-Induced Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: A Review.

Drug-induced reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a part of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), often a life-threatening condition. DRESS is an uncommon reaction; however, it is more prevalent than Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) and is left undiagnosed due to its atypical clinical presentation. So far, no standard criteria or investigational tool assists in early and accurate diagnosis. The administration of systemic corticosteroids remains the widely used first line of management. However, new studies have revealed other potential treatment armamentariums. Because of the potential life-threatening outcome, every physician who deals with acute cases should be familiar with the clinical presentation and be able to start the necessary measurements. Recent studies revealed important information in the pathogenesis and management of the disorder were summarized in this review.

Granuloma annulare after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A case report and a literature review.

INTRODUCTION: During the Cov-19 pandemic, many studies reported a broad spectrum of cutaneous reactions presenting as erythematous rashes or pernio-like, urticaria-like or vesicular/bullous patterns associated with Cov-19-infection and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. METHODS: The authors documented the clinical and histopathological features of an unexpected case of granuloma annulare (GA) arising a few days after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and reviewed all GAs reported in the literature following the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and Cov-19-infection. CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old woman developed a single reddish lesion on the left deltoid region, where the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine seven days earlier was injected. The clinicians performed a punch skin biopsy, and histology revealed an interstitial GA. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the potential, though rare, GA occurrence as a possible adverse event after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This additional case, like what happens after the administration of other vaccines, supports the idea that GA may result from the immune system activation following the vaccination. However, notwithstanding, they should encourage their patients to obtain immunization to assist the public health systems in overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic.

Prevalence and Description of the Skin Reactions Associated with Adhesives in Diabetes Technology Devices in an Adult Population: Results of the CUTADIAB Study.

Objective: The use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) devices adhering to the skin can lead to skin reactions. The objective was to determine the prevalence and consequences of skin reactions at CGM or CSII sites in a large unbiased population. Research Design and Methods: This is a cross-sectional multicenter study. All adult patients with diabetes seen in consultation over a period of 7 months and using or having used a system with skin adhesives (in the last 10 years) were included and filled out a self-assessment questionnaire. Results: Among 851 patients, skin reaction was reported in 28% with CGM and 29% with CSII. Patients reporting reactions were more frequently women using CGM and CSII, and CGM users had type 1 more often than type 2 diabetes (P < 0.001). Manifestations were similar for reactions to CGM and CSII: redness and pruritus in 70%-75% of patients with reactions, pain in 20%-25%, and vesicles and desquamation in 12%-15%. Manifestations occurred within the first 24 h of first use in 22%-24% of patients with reactions to CGM and CSII, but after more than 6 months in 38% and 47% of patients with reactions to CGM and CSII, respectively. Device use was definitively stopped in 12% of patients with reactions to CGM (3.2% of all users) and 7% with reactions to CSII (2.1% of all users). Conclusions: Skin reactions were common, with similar presentations in CGM and CSII users. Manifestations suggested skin irritation rather than allergies. These reactions rarely led to the definitive discontinuation of the use of the device.

Cutaneous Adverse Events After COVID-19 Vaccination.

Purpose: The morphology and timing of cutaneous reactions after Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines have been well described; however, data on the rates and risk factors are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the incidence of cutaneous adverse reactions (CARs) after COVID-19 vaccination in Thailand, describe the rash characteristics according to the doses or types of vaccine, and assess the risk factors for developing CARs. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective observational study of adults who received COVID-19 vaccination and provided informed consent. Cutaneous diagnoses were made by expert dermatologists with supporting skin biopsies, as needed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression to examine the independent risk of developing a CAR. Results: Between July 2021 and January 2022, 7505 participants were vaccinated. Vaccine-related CARs occurred in 92 patients with an overall risk of 1.2%. CARs occurred after the first (n=41), second (n=23), third (n=27), and fourth (n=1) doses. Among the 92, 75 (81%) developed CARs within 7 days and 61 (66%) resolved within 7 days. Urticaria, injection site reaction, and a delayed (≥ 3 days post vaccine) local reaction were the three most common CARs occurring in 59 cases (64%). In total, 51 (55%) patients received only symptomatic and supportive treatment. Underlying urticaria and psoriasis were the independent factors for developing a CAR: adjusted odd rations of 15.63 (6.02-40.57, p < 0.001) and 5.36 (1.57-18.36, p = 0.007), respectively. A total of 6/34 (17%) and 4/31 (12%) patients developed urticarial and psoriasis flare post vaccine. Our study found superficial perivascular and intraepidermal eosinophil infiltration, which may be unusual pathological findings in vaccine-induced pemphigus foliaceous. Conclusion: CARs after COVID-19 vaccination had a low incidence and were mostly mild in severity and transient in nature. Underlying urticaria and psoriasis were risk factors for CAR development.

Metronidazole induced cutaneous adverse drug reaction- a systematic review of descriptive studies.

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of research studies on metronidazole-related cutaneous symptoms have recently been published. Our objective was to identify and evaluate descriptive studies that described metronidazole-related skin manifestations, therapeutic interventions, and consequences. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, and grey literature databases from inception to April 2022 without any constraints, as well as a snowball search in Google and a search in Google Scholar. Descriptive articles describing metronidazole-related cutaneous manifestations were considered for the review. Two distinct reviewers carried out the research selection, data extraction, and quality assessment; any discrepancies were resolved by consensus with the third reviewer. RESULTS: About 24 out of 4648 descriptive studies, including 26 patients (20 Female patients and 6 male patients), were included in this review. The included studies comprised a range of ages from 16 to 78 years old. Metronidazole was indicated for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, sepsis, anti-infection therapy, perforated appendicitis, rosacea, vaginal discharge, dysentery, acne rosacea, trichomonal vaginitis, lichen planus, liver abscess, facial rosacea, intestinal amoebiasis, and gingivitis. Fixed drug eruption was the most common skin manifestation which was reported in 7 cases included in this review. Cutaneous manifestations were ameliorated by cessation of the offending drug and by apportioning antihistamines, topical steroids, parenteral corticosteroids, emollients, and topical moisturizers. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and healthcare professionals should be cognizant of the potential cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) induced by metronidazole to mitigate fatal circumstances. The management of the CADRs appears to respond effectively with immediate drug discontinuation and supportive therapy.

Keratosis Pilaris-like Eruption during Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Literature Review and Report of a Case Related to Imatinib.

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) blocking BCR-ABL activity has revolutionized the therapeutic management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Adverse cutaneous reactions (ACRs) are common nonhematologic adverse events associated with the use of BCR-ABL TKIs. A characteristic pattern of eruption resembling keratosis pilaris (KP) has been described in patients treated with these drugs, especially nilotinib and dasatinib. The pathogenesis of this ACR is still unknown. This type of reaction appears to be uncommon with imatinib. Here, we report the case of an elderly patient with an asymptomatic KP-like eruption, which appeared one month after starting treatment with imatinib for CML. The case presentation is accompanied by a review of similar reactions in patients with CML treated with BCR-ABL inhibitors, attempting to make an excursus on the molecular targets of such drugs and possible mechanisms underlying this ACR.

Cutaneous Allergic reactions to pine processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea Pityocampa): a complicated cutaneous reaction in an infant and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Thaumetopoea Pityocampa (TP) are frequent in the Mediterranean region especially affecting forest workers in pinewood areas. The common symptoms include swelling, rash or burns like any form of dermatitis. The reactions can be triggered by mechanical, chemical or allergic factors and the `allergic` reaction is caused by sensitization to a hair protein named `thaumetopoein`. This protein triggers the IgE mediated reaction resulting in the mast cell degranulation causing urticaria. Different kinds of allergic reactions like urticaria or anaphylaxis have been reported previously commonly in adults, especially in forest workers while severe reactions without direct contact are rare in pediatric population. CASE: A 28 month old healthy boy was admitted to Near East University Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Outpatient Clinic in March with complaints of pain, hyperemia and swelling on the left hand. His complaints had started the day before his admission just after walking around in their garden which is surrounded by pine trees. On admission, his physical examination revealed serious edema and hyperemia on his left hand limiting his finger movements with a few bullae on the skin. His temperature was 38 C and the other vital parameters were normal. Based on hyperemia, swelling and high acute phase reactants he was hospitalized with the differential diagnosis of soft tissue inflammation and cellulitis. The case was treated with iv antihistamines, systemic steroids and antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Pine processionary (PP) is an important irritant and allergen especially in endemic areas like Cyprus which is a Mediterranean Country. It must be kept in mind in case of local or generalized urticaria, dermatitis, bullae and other allergic reactions even if there had been no direct contact with PP. Systemic involvement with fever and elevated acute phase reactants in infancy may necessitate hospitalization and intravenous treatment. Hereby, we reported an infant who presented with fever in addition to severe cutaneous lesions following the exposure to TP without direct contact. This is the first case reported from North Cyprus.

Delayed Cutaneous Adverse Reaction of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine in a Breastfed Female Infant: A Coincidence or a Rare Effect?

The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vector vaccine (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK) was developed at Oxford University and is considered safe for the administration in lactating mothers. Nevertheless, as a novel vaccine, there are gaps in the knowledge regarding possible adverse events in breastfeeding infants of vaccinated mothers. This case report provides first-time data on a possible delayed, cutaneous, adverse reaction in a breastfed, 16-month-old female infant after the first administration of the AstraZeneca vaccine to her 33-year-old mother. Even though, no clinical adverse effects were observed in the mother, her daughter had a 2-day rash in the lower extremities and face. The infant's cutaneous rashes might be a coincidental event. However, all skin lesions were analogous to previous descriptions and photographs of dermatologic reactions, which resolved spontaneously with no medical intervention, in people who had been vaccinated with other COVID-19 vaccines. Our aim is that this short report contributes to the enhancement of parental awareness about the possibility of similar skin rashes in breastfed children when the mothers receive a vaccination and the importance of reporting those adverse reactions to the competent authorities.

Supportive Oncodermatology in Pediatric Patients.

Cutaneous reactions to targeted therapies are varied and common. Pediatric dermatology literature is emerging on the specific types and prevalence of cutaneous reactions to targeted therapies that hone in on membrane-bound receptors, intracellular signaling targets, and antiangiogenesis agents, as well as targeted immunotherapies. Data regarding the timing, severity, and treatment algorithms are most plentiful for BRAF, MEK, and EGFR inhibitors.

Methotrexate related cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, there is an increased number of reports being published on Methotrexate (MTX) related cutaneous manifestations. We aimed to identify and critically appraise descriptive studies describing the MTX related skin manifestations, treatment approach, and their outcomes. METHODOLOGY: An extensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from inception to April 2021 without any restrictions along with the bibliographic search of included studies, grey literature search, and a snowball search was performed in Google and Google Scholar to identify the relevant literature. Descriptive studies reporting MTX related cutaneous manifestations were considered for the review. The study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers and any disagreements were settled by consensus with the third reviewer. RESULTS: 31 out of 8,365 descriptive studies including 38 patients (22 females and 16 males) aged between 12 and 78 years prescribed for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriasis were included in this review. Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), papular eruption, vasculitis, erosions of psoriasis, ulcerated psoriatic plaques, local reactions, keratinocyte dystrophy, erythema multiforme, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, Steven Johnson syndrome and photosensitive dermatitis were the majority of MTX induced cutaneous reactions. Immediate withdrawal of MTX, providing appropriate care with anti-inflammatory, topical steroids, and supplementation with folic acid were reported to be effective for the management of the MTX related cutaneous manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and healthcare professionals should be aware of possible acute cutaneous drug reactions induced by MTX to avoid further consequences and fatal conditions. Immediate withdrawal of MTX and supportive care were reported as an efficacious therapeutic management of acute cutaneous drug reactions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020220038.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers in dermatology: a narrative review.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used for cardiovascular diseases, especially for patients who can't tolerate the side effects of cough and angioedema caused by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). However, the evidence of using ARBs in dermatology is mostly anecdotal and limited to case reports or small case series. Here we present a narrative review focusing on the therapeutic use of ARBs in dermatology and adverse cutaneous reactions due to the administration of ARBs.

Angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in dermatology: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are commonly used for cardiovascular diseases. The evidence supporting the use of ACEI in dermatology is limited. AREAS COVERED: This review article was divided into three parts. The first part discusses ACEI in clinical use in dermatology. The second part reveals the relationship between angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and immune diseases, and further discusses the possible relationship between ACEI in clinical use in these diseases and ACE. The third part focuses on cutaneous adverse reactions of ACEI. EXPERT OPINION: The use of ACEI in dermatology is mainly based on its properties as regulation of renin angiotensin system (RAS), but currently, with limited clinical use. The association of ACE and several diseases are well discussed, including COVID-19, psoriasis, sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and vitiligo. The main cutaneous adverse effects of ACEI include angioedema, psoriasis and pemphigus. Plausible factors for these adverse reactions include accumulation of vasoactive mediators, preventing angiotensin from binding to AT1 receptor and AT2 receptor and presence of circulating antibodies.

Local bullous reaction as a cutaneous reaction after mRNA-boosted vaccination in a post-COVID patient.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The spectrum of symptomatic infection ranges from mild to critical with multiple severe complications. Many vaccines have been developed to prevent COVID-19 disease, including an mRNA vaccine. Different adverse effects were reported as delayed large local reactions, swelling, erythema, urticarial, and morbilliform rashes. Among these, bullous reactions from the vaccine are considered rare. Here, we described a local bullous reaction after an mRNA booster vaccination in a post-COVID patient.

Cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccines: A review.

Background: The increasing number of reports on cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination has led to growing concerns among certain groups. Objective: We reviewed the published reports of cutaneous lesions after COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We conducted a literature search for original and review articles published between January 1, 2020, and September 27, 2021. Results: Eleven cutaneous reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccines were determined; the most prevalent reactions were local injection site reactions, delayed local reactions, urticaria, angioedema, and morbilliform eruptions. There were more reports on skin reactions following the administration of messenger RNA-based vaccines than on those following the administration of adenoviral vector or inactivated whole-virus vaccines, in part, due to their higher administration rate. Most reported skin reactions occurred after the first vaccine dose. Limitations: A reporting bias could not be excluded, and skin biopsy results were not available for most included individuals. Moreover, given that the included trials focused on vaccine efficacy, there was a lack of details concerning cutaneous reactions and participant information. Conclusion: Not all cutaneous reactions observed after COVID-19 vaccination are hypersensitivity reactions. Different cutaneous reactions may reflect underlying immune responses to the vaccines. A large majority of COVID-19 vaccination reactions were mild and self-limiting, and people should be encouraged to complete their vaccination regimen.