The Moral Psychology of Artificial Intelligence.

Moral psychology was shaped around three categories of agents and patients: humans, other animals, and supernatural beings. Rapid progress in artificial intelligence has introduced a fourth category for our moral psychology to deal with: intelligent machines. Machines can perform as moral agents, making decisions that affect the outcomes of human patients or solving moral dilemmas without human supervision. Machines can be perceived as moral patients, whose outcomes can be affected by human decisions, with important consequences for human-machine cooperation. Machines can be moral proxies that human agents and patients send as their delegates to moral interactions or use as a disguise in these interactions. Here we review the experimental literature on machines as moral agents, moral patients, and moral proxies, with a focus on recent findings and the open questions that they suggest.

The evaluation of health, disability and aged care-sector engagement with resources designed to support optimisation of the allied health assistant workforce: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Allied health assistants (AHAs) support allied health professionals (AHPs) to meet workforce demands in modern healthcare systems. In an Australian context historically, AHAs have been sub-optimally utilised. Prior research has identified that AHAs and AHPs working in health, disability and aged care sectors, and the Vocational Education and Training (VET) industry, may benefit from access to resources to support the optimisation of the AHA workforce. As a part of a Victorian department of health funded project, several resources were developed in line with workforce recommendations for use in each of the above sectors. Recommendations and resources covered the broad areas of pre-employment training, workforce planning and governance, consumer-centred therapy and supports, recruitment and induction and workplace training and development. This study aimed to evaluate the engagement with these newly designed resources to support optimisation of AHAs in the Victorian context. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted to evaluate engagement with resources, from the perspective of AHAs, AHPs and allied health leaders (AHLs) in the health, aged care or disability sectors, and educators and managers of allied health assistance training. Thematic analysis was conducted using team-based framework analysis. RESULTS: Thematic framework analysis of the interview data identified four themes; Why participants accessed the resources; How participants engaged with the resources; What (if any) changes in practice occurred as a result of engaging with the resources in a participant's local context, How did participants envision the resources being utilised for AHA workforce optimisation in the future. Responses were mapped to the AHA workforce career pathway at the career preparation, career development and career trajectory tiers. CONCLUSIONS: Appetite for AHA workforce development and optimal utilisation is evident across Victoria, Australia. Readily accessible resources that inform AHA role and scope of practice, delegation practice, or improve the ability for an AHA to state their own development needs, were identified as useful by participants. The potential for these resources to assist in the optimal utilisation and development of AHA workforces across the career continuum differs according to the role, sector and geographical location of the resource user. Further study is needed to investigate the transferability of these resources to national and global contexts.

Delegating care as a double-edged sword for quality of nursing care: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Considering the significance of care delegation in enhancing the quality of nursing care and ensuring patient safety, it is imperative to explore nurses' experiences in this domain. As such, this study aimed to explore the experiences of Iranian nurses regarding the delegation of care. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted between 2022 and 2023, employing the content analysis method with a conventional approach. The study utilized purposeful sampling method to select qualified participants. Data collection was carried out through in-depth and semi-structured interviews utilizing open-ended questions. The data analysis process followed the steps proposed by Graneheim and Lundman (2004) and involved the use of MAXQDA version 12 software. To ensure the trustworthiness of the data, the study employed the four rigor indices outlined by Lincoln and Guba (1985). RESULTS: In the present study, a total of 15 interviews were conducted with 12 participants, the majority of whom were women. The age range of the participants fell between 25 and 40 years. Through qualitative data analysis, eight subcategories and three main categories of "insourcing of care", "outsourcing of care" and "delegating of care to non-professionals" were identified. Additionally, the overarching theme that emerged from the analysis was "delegation of care, a double-edged sword". CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study revealed that the delegation of care occurred through three distinct avenues: to colleagues within the same unit, to colleagues in other units, and to non-professionals. Delegating care was found to have potential benefits, such as reducing the nursing workload and fostering teamwork. However, it was also observed that in certain instances, delegation was not only unhelpful but also led to missed nursing care. Therefore, it is crucial to adhere to standardized principles when delegating care to ensure the maintenance of high-quality nursing care.

Time spent on activities that can be delegated and reasons for not delegating among acute care nurses: A mixed-methods study.

AIM: To describe the activities nurses perceived to be delegable to other staff (delegable activities) in order to estimate the time nurses spend on delegable activities and explore nurses' reasons for not delegating these activities. DESIGN: Mixed-methods explanatory sequential. METHODS: In total, 236 nurses from 27 medical and surgical wards of five hospitals in northern Italy completed a web-based survey during a single shift between June and July 2022. Minutes spent on delegable activities, staff member to whom participants could have delegated and reason(s) for not delegating were reported. Chief nurses provided specific wards' characteristics using a paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore delegable activities and reasons for not delegating. Quantitative and qualitative results were merged using joint displays. RESULTS: Participants spent approximately one-quarter of their time performing delegable activities, mainly delegable to nurse aides or nurse clerks, and performed due to a lack/shortage of staff or their concurrent participation in other activities. Participants recognized that activities requiring clinical assessment and decision-making skills cannot be delegated, whereas technical activities and indirect care should be delegated. Organizational, structural and cultural factors, as well as patient characteristics, available staff and experience affected delegation, leading nurses to perform delegable activities to ensure patient care. CONCLUSION: Nurses spend a considerable part of their time on delegable activities due to a lack of staff or support services and suboptimal organization, which could be addressed by optimal staff management, but also to the complexity of the contexts, including individual and cultural factors that should be addressed through policy interventions. IMPACT: This study estimates the time nurses spend on delegable activities in acute care settings. Our findings highlighted the reasons that sustain the decision not to delegate that policymakers, healthcare managers, and nurse educators should consider to promote nurses' delegation skills. REPORTING METHODS: MMR checklist. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: None.

A Comprehensive Approach to User Delegation and Anonymity within Decentralized Identifiers for IoT.

Decentralized Identifiers have recently expanded into Internet of Things devices and are crucial in securing users' digital identities and data. However, Decentralized Identifiers face challenges in scenarios necessitating authority delegation and anonymity, such as when dealing with legal guardianship for minors, device loss or damage, and specific medical contexts involving patient information. This paper aims to strengthen data sovereignty within the Decentralized Identifier system by implementing a secure authority delegation and anonymity scheme. It suggests optimizing verifiable presentations by utilizing a sequential aggregate signature, a Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proof, and a Merkle tree to prevent against linkage and Sybil attacks while facilitating delegation. This strategy mitigates security risks related to delegation and anonymity, efficiently reduces the computational and verification efforts for signatures, and reduces the size of verifiable presentations by about 1.2 to 2 times.

Factors impacting nursing assistants to accept a delegation in the acute care settings: A mixed method study.

AIMS: To investigate the experience of nursing assistants being delegated nursing tasks by registered nurses. DESIGN: Mixed method explanatory sequential design. METHODS: A total of 79 nursing assistants working in an acute hospital in Australia completed surveys that aimed to identify their experience of working with nurses and the activities they were delegated. The survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Interviews with 11 nursing assistants were conducted and analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results were triangulated to provide a richer understanding of the phenomena. RESULTS: Most nursing assistants felt supported completing delegated care activities. However, there was confusion around their scope of practice, some felt overworked and believed that they did not have the right to refuse a delegation. Factors impacting the nursing assistant's decision to accept a delegation included the attitude of the nurses, wanting to be part of the team and the culture of the ward. Nursing assistants who were studying to be nurses felt more supported than those who were not. CONCLUSIONS: Delegation is a two-way relationship and both parties need to be cognisant of their roles and responsibilities to ensure safe and effective nursing care is provided. Incorrectly accepting or refusing delegated activities may impact patient safety. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Highlights the need for implementing strategies to support safe delegation practices between the registered and unregulated workforce to promote patient safety. IMPACT: Describes the experiences of nursing assistants working in the acute care environment when accepting delegated care from nurses. Reports a range of factors that inhibit or facilitate effective delegation practices between nurses and nursing assistants. Provides evidence to support the need for stronger education and policy development regarding delegation practices between nurses and unregulated staff. REPORTING METHOD: Complied with the APA Style JARS-MIXED reporting criteria for mixed method research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Effects of work environments on satisfaction of nurses working for integrated care system in South Korea: a multisite cross-sectional investigation.

BACKGROUND: Nurses' satisfaction has an impact on organizational and patient outcomes. Integrated care system in South Korea was established in 2015 to improve care quality and decrease caregiving burden. Since then, nurses' satisfaction has increased due to an increase in nursing staffing. However, besides nurse staffing, various work environments still affect nurse satisfaction. METHODS: Individual online surveys were conducted with participants to determine their personal characteristics, work environments, and hospital characteristics. We used mixed-effects linear regression equation contained both fixed and random effects. RESULTS: This study included 2,913 nurses from 119 hospitals. Their average job satisfaction was less than 6 points out of 10 points. Age, shift type, perceived workload, and delegation criteria were significant factors influencing nurses' satisfaction. There was no significant factor among hospital characteristics. The satisfaction level of nurses was high for no-night rotating shift, low perceived workload, and clear delegation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses' satisfaction is affected by several work environmental factors. Low nurse satisfaction has a substantial impact on both patients and nurses. Therefore, nurse managers and hospitals should determine factors influencing their satisfaction and develop strategies to improve their satisfaction.

Delegation of insulin administration: a survey of community nursing teams in England.

In community nursing, the administration of insulin for people with type 2 diabetes can be delegated by registered nurses to healthcare support workers. Although a voluntary framework in England provides national guidance, little is known about its uptake. The project aim was to determine the roll-out, characteristics and support needs in relation to the delegation of insulin administration in community settings. An online survey was disseminated to community nursing services in England via social media and nursing networks. Of the 115 responding organisations, 81% (n=93) had an insulin delegation programme, with most initiated since 2018. From these services, 41% (n=3704) of insulin injections were delegated daily, with benefits for patients, staff and services reported, along with some challenges. Delegation of insulin administration is an established and valued initiative. Awareness of the national voluntary framework is increasing. National guidance is considered important to support governance arrangements and safety.

The Art of Delegation.

The nurse staffing crisis requires nurses and administrators to think differently about how to get things done. Delegation is key to doing more work with fewer registered nurses (RNs) and retaining current RN staff. Responsibility for effective delegation does not rest solely with the RN but begins with the institution, and includes both the delegator and delegatee. While effective delegation has often been referred to as an art, knowing the science behind delegation can aid in honing a skill necessary for top of license practice.

Trustworthiness as information: Satisfying the understanding condition of valid consent.

Within medical ethics, there is widespread agreement that morally valid consent includes an understanding condition. Disagreement centers on what is meant by that understanding condition. Tom Dougherty proposed that this understanding condition should be divided into the two mutually exclusive categories of descriptive information and contextual information. Further, Dougherty argues that each type of information is necessary to satisfy the understanding condition. In contrast, I argue that when the deontic aspect of valid consent is in view, each type of information can be sufficient to satisfy the understanding condition on its own. Moreover, by analyzing delegation, which is conceptually related to consent since both are morally transformative actions, I show that delegation often depends not on descriptive or contextual information but on trust. So, I argue that trustworthiness can also be a type of information that does the same work as descriptive and contextual information in satisfying the understanding condition for valid consent.

User Testing of the Veteran Delegation Tool: Qualitative Inquiry.

BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers, or care partners, provide critical support to care recipients when managing health care. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) priorities identify care partners as vital in supporting veterans' care management. The Veteran Delegation Tool (VDT) is VHA's Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant solution for care partners to comanage veterans' care through VHA's electronic health portal. Human-centered design approaches in VDT development are needed to inform enhancements aimed at promoting uptake and sustained use. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this prospective descriptive quality improvement project was to use a human-centered design approach to examine VDT use perceptions and practical experiences. METHODS: This project was conducted using a 4-phase approach: frame, discover, design, and deliver. The frame phase designed the protocol and prepared the VDT system for testing. This paper reports on the discover phase, which used semistructured and follow-up interviews and user testing to examine VDT's benefits, facilitators, and barriers. The discover phase data informed the design and deliver phases, which are underway. RESULTS: Veterans (24/54, 44%), care partners (21/54, 39%), and individuals who represented dual roles (9/54, 17%)-namely veteran care partner (4/54, 7%), veteran clinical provider (2/54, 4%), and care partner provider (3/54, 6%)-participated in semistructured interviews in the discover phase. A subsample of these participants (3/54, 6%) participated in the follow-up interviews and user testing. Analysis of the semistructured interviews indicated convergence on the respondents' perceptions of VDT's benefits, facilitators, and barriers and recommendations for improving VDT. The perceived benefits were authorized access, comanagement of care needs on the web, communication with the clinical team, access to resources, and ease of burden. Perceived barriers were nonrecognition of the benefits of VDT, technical literacy access issues, increased stress in or burden on care partners, and personal health information security. Participant experiences across 4 VDT activity domains were upgrade to My HealtheVet Premium account, registration, sign-in, and use. User testing demonstrated users' challenges to register, navigate, and use VDT. Findings informed VDT development enhancements and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Care partners need Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant access to electronic health portals to assist with care management. VDT is VHA's solution, allowing communication among delegates, veterans, and clinical care teams. Users value VDT's potential use and benefits, while access and navigation improvements to ensure uptake and sustained use are needed. Future efforts need to iteratively evaluate the human-centered phases, design and deliver, of VDT to target audiences. Continued efforts to understand and respond to care partners' needs are warranted.

Integrative review: Factors impacting effective delegation practices by registered nurses to assistants in nursing.

AIM: To identify the evidence on factors that impact delegation practices by Registered Nurses to Assistants in Nursing in acute care hospitals. DESIGN: An integrative review. DATA SOURCES: Database searches were conducted between July 2011 and July 2021. REVIEW METHODS: We used the 12-step approach by Kable and colleagues to document the search strategy. The (Whittemore & Knafl. 2005. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553) integrative review framework method was adopted and the methodological quality of the studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs critical appraisal instruments. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. Delegation between the Registered Nurse and the Assistant in Nursing is a complex but critical leadership skill which is impacted by the Registered Nurse's understanding of the Assistant in Nursing's role, scope of practice and job description. Newly qualified nurses lacked the necessary leadership skills to delegate. Further education on delegation is required in pre-registration studies and during nurses' careers to ensure Registered Nurses are equipped with the skills and knowledge to delegate effectively. CONCLUSION: With increasing numbers of Assistants in Nursing working in the acute care environment, it is essential that Registered Nurses are equipped with the appropriate leadership skills to ensure safe delegation practice.

Delegation of insulin administration to non-registered healthcare workers in community nursing teams: A qualitative study.

AIMS: To explore stakeholder perspectives on the benefits and/or disadvantages of the delegation of insulin injections to healthcare support workers in community nursing services. DESIGN: Qualitative case study. METHODS: Interviews with stakeholders purposively sampled from three case sites in England. Data collection took place between October 2020 and July 2021. A reflexive thematic approach to analysis was adopted. RESULTS: A total of 34 interviews were completed: patients and relatives (n = 7), healthcare support workers (n = 8), registered nurses (n = 10) and senior managers/clinicians (n = 9). Analysis resulted in three themes: (i) Acceptance and confidence, (ii) benefits and (iii) concerns and coping strategies. Delegation was accepted by stakeholders on condition that appropriate training, supervision and governance was in place. Continuing contact between patients and registered nurses, and regular contact between registered nurses and healthcare support workers was deemed essential for clinical safety. Services were reliant on the contribution of healthcare support workers providing insulin injections, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Benefits for service and registered nurses included: flexible team working, increased service capacity and care continuity. Job satisfaction and career development was reported for healthcare support workers. Patients benefit from timely administration, and enhanced relationships with the nursing team. Concerns raised by all stakeholders included potential missed care, remuneration and task shifting. CONCLUSION: Delegation of insulin injections is acceptable to stakeholders and has many benefits when managed effectively. IMPACT: Demand for community nursing is increasing. Findings of this study suggest that delegation of insulin administration contributes to improving service capacity. Findings highlight the essential role played by key factors such as appropriate training, competency assessment and teamwork, in developing confidence in delegation among stakeholders. Understanding and supporting these factors can help ensure that practice develops in an acceptable, safe and beneficial way, and informs future development of delegation practice in community settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A service user group was consulted during the design phase prior to grant application and provided comments on draft findings. Two people with diabetes were members of the project advisory group and contributed to the study design, development of interview questions, monitoring study progress and provided feedback on study findings.

Compensating for Sensing Failures via Delegation in Human-AI Hybrid Systems.

Given the increasing prevalence of intelligent systems capable of autonomous actions or augmenting human activities, it is important to consider scenarios in which the human, autonomous system, or both can exhibit failures as a result of one of several contributing factors (e.g., perception). Failures for either humans or autonomous agents can lead to simply a reduced performance level, or a failure can lead to something as severe as injury or death. For our topic, we consider the hybrid human-AI teaming case where a managing agent is tasked with identifying when to perform a delegated assignment and whether the human or autonomous system should gain control. In this context, the manager will estimate its best action based on the likelihood of either (human, autonomous) agent's failure as a result of their sensing capabilities and possible deficiencies. We model how the environmental context can contribute to, or exacerbate, these sensing deficiencies. These contexts provide cases where the manager must learn to identify agents with capabilities that are suitable for decision-making. As such, we demonstrate how a reinforcement learning manager can correct the context-delegation association and assist the hybrid team of agents in outperforming the behavior of any agent working in isolation.

A scoping review of registered nurses' delegating care and support to unlicenced care and support workers.

AIM: To scope the international literature about registered nurses delegated models of care to unlicenced workers, identify gaps and reflect upon how the evidence relates to nursing in multiple contexts. DESIGN: Scoping review of the peer reviewed literature from the year 2000 onwards, using the PRISMA-ScR checklist. METHODS: The study searched the following databases in February 2022: CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, and SCOPUS, and included keywords, Boolean operators and subject headings relevant to registered nurses delegating the provision of care to unlicenced workers. RESULTS: A total of 49 articles met the eligibility criteria for this study, and relevant data were extractedThree models of delegation were highlighted within the literature: direct, indirect and a mixture of both. The data highlighted that direct delegation mainly occurred in acute contexts, with delegation decreasing with increasing patient acuity and/or complexity but the threshold of when this would occur was not clear. There was one intervention study that measured patient outcomes which could aid in the determination of what is effective delegation. For studies that did report on it (n = 6), there were few examples of better patient outcomes in cases where care was delegated from registered nurses to unlicenced workers. CONCLUSIONS: The scoping review highlighted heterogeneity in practice areas and methods of delegation practice. A key gap in literature is the absence of studies focusing on patient outcomes, with a clear baseline to measure and identify effective delegation practices. Additionally, the legal and logistical implications presented in both direct and indirect delegation practices is not evident in the literature. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Decisions related to delegation are often made at the service level and prescribed to those who work within the service, suggesting that models of indirect delegation are in fact not delegation at all, rather a re-distribution of nurses' work. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Delegation is a vital component of the scope of practice of registered nurses. This review has highlighted unique differences in delegation by practice context, where the proliferation of unlicensed workers in certain contexts places a vastly different professional and legal burden on the registered nurse.

Work situation of rheumatologists and residents in times of COVID-19 : Findings from a survey in Germany.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The work situation is an important dimension of professional life and wellbeing, and a policy lever to strengthen recruitment and retention. This study aims to explore the work situation of physicians and residents in internal medical rheumatology, considering the impact of the coronavirus pandemic COVID-19. METHODS: A questionnaire-based online survey was conducted in early 2021 at the Hannover Medical School, supported by the German Society of Rheumatology. Target groups were all rheumatology physicians and residents in Germany. The main areas of investigation included work hours, task delegation, and collaboration; workload and mental health issues; discrimination and sexual harassment experiences; and the impact of COVID-19. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for the standardized items and qualitative content analysis for the free-text information. RESULTS: The respondents (n = 101) expressed positive attitudes towards cooperation and task delegation to medical assistants, especially those specialized in rheumatology, while attitudes towards cooperation with GPs pointed to blockades. There was a strong mismatch between actual and desired work hours both in the group of women and in the group of men. 81% rated their workload as high or very high; every sixth rheumatologist has suffered from stress or burnout syndromes at least once in the past. Experiences of gender discrimination and sexual harassment/violence were frequently reported, mostly by women. COVID-19 was an amplifier of stress, with major stressors being digitalization and increased demand for communication and patient education. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need to improve the work situation of rheumatologists and reduce stress and mental health risks.

Observations in the Field Concerning Home Dialysis.

This article describes observations and findings related to home dialysis therapy. Dialyzing at home provides many benefits, giving patients more flexibility and autonomy. Ensuring proper education and training, and home adaptation is critical for patient safety. Survey findings related to group training, home visits, medical records, and the use of patient care technicians in home dialysis are reviewed. Implications for nephrology nursing in each scenario are discussed, including survey guidance for transitional care dialysis.

The registered nursing associate: an overview.

Registered nursing associates have obtained a nursing associate foundation degree that has been endorsed by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) through an approved educational institution. This usually involves 2 years of higher-level study, enabling the registered nursing associate to undertake more complex and significant tasks than a healthcare assistant would, but without the scope of a registered nurse. It is not the intention to replace the registered nurse with a registered nursing associate. The role is used and regulated in England, with the aim of addressing a skills gap between healthcare assistants/support workers and registered nurses - it can also provide a progression route into graduate-level nursing. This article, the first in a series, provides an overview of the registered nursing associate role.

Contextual factors influencing the delegation of tasks to Multi-skilled Community Health Workers in Haiti / Facteurs contextuels influençant la délégation de tâches aux Agents de Santé Communautaire Polyvalents en Haïti

Introduction: In Haiti, the delegation of tasks to Multi-skilled Community Health Workers (locally called ASCP) is a strategy implemented by the Ministry of Public Health and Population to improve universal health coverage. Purpose of research: To contribute to the successful implementation of this strategy, this article reports on a case study of its implementation in the northern health department of Haiti. More specifically, this article provides information on the contextual factors that facilitate or hinder the implementation of task delegation to ASCP. Results: The results obtained show notable progress in the implementation of task delegation to ASCP in the northern health department of Haiti. These mainly concern the following activities: selection, training, and deployment of ASCPs, endowment of work materials, supervision, collection and analysis of data on the results obtained. In September 2019, 215 ASCPs were active in the department. This corresponds to 44.3% of the 485 ASCPs planned to cover the department's needs. Several contextual factors hindering or facilitating the implementation of this intervention were also identified with 35 resource persons during semi-structured interviews. These relate to the planning and monitoring of the implementation of the intervention (cited by 12 out of 35 people), the institutional context (10/35), and political (17/35), structural (30/35) and environmental factors (7/35). Conclusions: This study highlights several contextual factors that need to be considered to ensure the successful implementation of the delegation of tasks to ASCP in Haiti and possibly in other contexts.

Introduction: En Haïti, la délégation des tâches aux Agents de Santé Communautaire Polyvalents (ASCP) est une stratégie mise en œuvre par le Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population en vue d'améliorer la couverture sanitaire universelle. But de l'étude: Afin de contribuer à la mise en œuvre réussie de cette stratégie, cet article rend compte d'une étude de cas portant sur son implantation dans le département sanitaire du nord d'Haïti. Plus spécifiquement, cet article renseigne sur les facteurs contextuels qui influencent la mise en œuvre de la délégation de tâches aux ASCP. Résultats: D'une manière générale, les résultats obtenus montrent des avancées notables dans la sélection, formation, dotation en matériels de travail, supervision et déploiement des ASCP. En septembre 2019, 215 ASCP étaient en activité dans le département sanitaire du nord d'Haïti, ce qui correspond à 44,3 % des 485 ASCP prévus pour couvrir les besoins du département. Plusieurs facteurs contextuels entravant ou facilitant la mise en œuvre de cette intervention ont été également identifiés auprès de 35 personnes-ressources lors d'entrevues semi-dirigées. Ceux-ci ont trait à la planification et au suivi de l'implantation de l'intervention (cités par 12 personnes sur 35), à l'environnement institutionnel (10/35) et à des facteurs d'ordre politique (17/35), structurel (30/35) et environnemental (7/35). Conclusions: Cette étude met en lumière plusieurs facteurs contextuels qu'il convient de prendre en compte pour assurer le succès de l'implantation de la délégation de tâches aux ASCP en Haïti et, éventuellement, dans d'autres contextes.

Cooperation between health professionals in primary care for the management of musculoskeletal disorders a narrative review / Modèles de partage des tâches impliquant les kinésithérapeutes pour la prise en charge des troubles musculosquelettiques en soins primaires: une revue narrative

Introduction: The current medical shortage and increasing healthcare needs lead to the overcrowding of primary care services. In an effort to cope with this, task sharing models of care have been implemented between healthcare professionals. Varied terms are used to describe these models. In France, "cooperation protocol" pathways have been established between general practitioners and physiotherapists. Objective: The aim of this narrative review is to define the terms used to describe models of task sharing involving physiotherapists for musculoskeletal care and to describe these models and their impact in order to suggest evolution prospects of French experimentations. Results: Delegation, task shifting, substitution, supplementation and advanced practice terms were found in the literature. A clear distinction is suggested between substitution and supplementation. Advanced practice physiotherapy is internationally defined and recognized. Advanced practice physiotherapy models of care seem to improve care access and quality of care without increasing costs. In France, two cooperation protocols have been implemented between general practitioners and physiotherapists for musculoskeletal disorders. Regarding the obstacles to their deployment, these models could evolve considering the international and formally defined framework of advanced practice physiotherapy. Conclusions: Task sharing models of care involving physiotherapists could be promising strategies to improve access to care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Further studies are needed to better define the models, their objectives and to evaluate their impact in the French context.

Introduction: L'engorgement des services de soins primaires et l'augmentation de la demande de soins conduisent à des difficultés croissantes d'accès aux soins de premier recours pour les patients souffrant de troubles musculosquelettiques. Pour y faire face, plusieurs modèles de partage de tâches entre les professionnels de santé sont mis en place. Dans la littérature, différentes notions sont employées pour décrire ces modèles. En France, ces expérimentations peuvent prendre la forme de « protocoles de coopération ¼ établis entre les médecins généralistes et les kinésithérapeutes. Objectif: Cette revue narrative vise à définir les notions employées pour décrire les modèles de partage de tâches impliquant les kinésithérapeutes dans la prise en charge des troubles musculosquelettiques à l'international, puis à décrire ces modèles et leur impact pour aboutir à des perspectives d'évolution des expérimentations françaises. Résultats: Les notions de « délégation ¼, de « transfert ¼, de « substitution ¼, de « supplémentation ¼ et de « pratique avancée ¼ sont employées dans la littérature. À la différence des termes « délégation ¼ et « transfert ¼, une distinction claire est retrouvée entre la substitution et la supplémentation. La pratique avancée en kinésithérapie est quant à elle, définie et reconnue à l'international. Elle permettrait d'améliorer l'accès et la qualité des soins, sans augmentation des coûts. En France, deux protocoles nationaux de coopération entre les médecins généralistes et les kinésithérapeutes existent pour les troubles musculo-squelettiques. En tenant compte des freins à leur déploiement rencontrés sur le terrain, ces modèles gagneraient à être repensés en s'inspirant du cadre international de la pratique avancée en kinésithérapie. Conclusions: Les modèles de partage de tâches impliquant les kinésithérapeutes en soins primaires semblent être des leviers d'amélioration de l'accès aux soins pour les patients souffrant de troubles musculosquelettiques. Davantage d'études permettant de mieux définir les modèles, leurs objectifs et d'en évaluer l'efficacité dans le contexte français restent nécessaires.