Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA). METHODS: This study included 220 patients with RA who were treated with JAKi. Sixty-two patients were naïve to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/JAKi (1st group), 57 patients were failure to one bDMARDs/JAKi (2nd group), and 101 patients were failure to ≥ 2 bDMARDs/JAKi. Of these 101 patients, 25 did not meet the D2T RA criteria (non-D2T RA group) and 76 met the D2T RA criteria (D2T RA group). RESULTS: : DAS28-ESR was improved in all groups at 24 weeks (1st: p<0.01, 2nd: p<0.01, non-D2T RA: p=0.01, D2TRA: p=0.02), and improvement ratio of DAS28-ESR was not different between DT2RA group and 2nd (p=0.73) or non-D2T RA group (p=0.68). Glucocorticoid use (odds ratios: 8.67; 95% CI: 1.23-60.90; P=0.03) and number of past bDMARD/JAKi uses ≥ 3 (odds ratios: 10.55; 95% CI: 1.39-80.30; P=0.02) were risk factors for DAS28-ESR ≥ 3.2 at 24 weeks in the D2T RA group. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical efficacy of JAKi in D2T RA group did not differ from that in 2nd and non-D2T RA groups. Glucocorticoid use and multiple bDMARD/JAKi failure were poor prognostic factors for D2T RA.

Real-World Retention Rate, Effectiveness, and Safety of Netakimab in the Treatment of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: First Year Results of the LIBRA Post-Registration Safety Study.

Netakimab has shown high efficacy in controlled clinical trials in the treatment of AS patients. This article presents results of an observational study of netakimab using in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: : To evaluate retention rates and safety of netakimab in patients with AS in real-world clinical practice. Additionally, the efficacy of netakimab was evaluated at 1-year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: : Patients were recruited for the study from August 2020 to December 2021 at 23 centers in the Russian Federation. The study included patients who were prescribed netakimab therapy before enrollment, so clinical and medical history data for the first visit were entered retrospectively, and following visits at 12, 24, and 52 weeks of therapy were collected within the study. Drug survival rate was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: : The study included 137 (93 men and 44 women) patients with AS. The average age of patients was 42.3 (11.9) years, 34.3% of patients had previously received therapy with bDMARD, mainly TNF inhibitors. At the end of the analyzed period (52 weeks of therapy), 90.4% (95% CI, 85.4-95.7) of patients continued treatment with netakimab. The BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP showed statistically significant decreases in scores from baseline at all time points. Netakimab was well tolerated by patients; AEs, related to therapy according to the investigator's opinion, were reported in 7 (5.1%) patients. Two patients stopped taking netakimab due to AEs (terminal ileitis and chronic colitis). CONCLUSIONS: : In real-world clinical practice, netakimab demonstrated high retention rates, a favorable safety profile, and sustained efficacy throughout the first year of therapy.

Long-Term Retention Rate of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Tofacitinib (TOFA) was the first Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) to be approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, data on the retention rate of TOFA therapy are still far from definitive. Objective: The goal of this study is to add new real-world data on the TOFA retention rate in a cohort of RA patients followed for a long period of time. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study of RA subjects treated with TOFA as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was conducted in 23 Italian tertiary rheumatology centers. The study considered a treatment period of up to 48 months for all included patients. The TOFA retention rate was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) for TOFA discontinuation were obtained using Cox regression analysis. Results: We enrolled a total of 213 patients. Data analysis revealed that the TOFA retention rate was 86.5% (95% CI: 81.8-91.5%) at month 12, 78.8% (95% CI: 78.8-85.2%) at month 24, 63.8% (95% CI: 55.1-73.8%) at month 36, and 59.9% (95% CI: 55.1-73.8%) at month 48 after starting treatment. None of the factors analyzed, including the number of previous treatments received, disease activity or duration, presence of rheumatoid factor and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibody, and presence of comorbidities, were predictive of the TOFA retention rate. Safety data were comparable to those reported in the registration studies. Conclusions: TOFA demonstrated a long retention rate in RA in a real-world setting. This result, together with the safety data obtained, underscores that TOFA is a viable alternative for patients who have failed treatment with csDMARD and/or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Further large, long-term observational studies are urgently needed to confirm these results.

Drug retention and safety of TNF inhibitors in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The concerns about the development of adverse events (AEs) in elderly RA patients as a result of age-related changes in drug metabolism and the presence of comorbid illnesses are emphasizing due to increasing prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in old age. However, they tend to be inadequately represented in RA clinical trials because of the exclusion criteria that are commonly applied. The tolerability and safety of TNF inhibitors in elderly patients have not been also evaluated in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the retention rate and safety of TNF inhibitors (TNFI) in elderly RA patients. METHODS: Total 429 RA patients (838 person-years [PYs]) treated with TNFI from a retrospective biologic DMARDs registry. Patients were divided into an elderly (age ≥60 years) and a younger group (<60 years). The drug retention rates of both groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. Potential predictors of TNFI discontinuation in the elderly were examined using Cox regression analysis. The incidence rate (IR) of serious adverse events (SAEs) in the elderly group was compared to that of the young group. RESULTS: Of the patients, 24.9 % (n = 107, 212 PYs) were in the elderly group. Regarding the retention rates of TNFI in 3 years, there was no significant difference between the elderly and younger group (p = 0.33). The major cause of discontinuation in elderly patients was AE (34.3 %), whereas that was drug ineffectiveness (41.7 %) in younger patients. Age (HR 1.09, CI 1.02-1.16) was a predictor of discontinuation, while the presence of comorbidity (HR 0.37, CI 0.15-0.91) had a protective effect against drug discontinuation in the elderly. The IR of SAEs in the elderly (6.13/100 PYs) was higher than in the younger group (5.11/100 PYs). CONCLUSIONS: The retention rate of TNFI in the elderly was comparable with that in younger patients. The major cause of discontinuation in the elderly patients was AEs, while it was drug ineffectiveness in younger patients. The IR of SAEs in the elderly was higher than in the younger patients.

Cycling versus swapping strategies with TNF-α inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis in clinical practice.

The availability of a number of bDMARDs with different mechanism of action increases potential treatment pathways in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In clinical practice, following the failure of one bDMARD, it is normal to consider which options are the best for switching strategy. In most cases this choice involves IL17i and TNFi. The main aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cycling (from TNFi to another TNFi) and swapping (from TNFi to IL17i or vice versa) strategies. In this monocentric retrospective observational study, all PsA patients treated with TNFi or IL17i between January 2016 and January 2022 were enrolled. The prescriptions were clustered in one cycling group (CG), and two swap groups: from TNFi to IL17i (SG1) and from IL17i to TNFi (SG2). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models were applied to compare the drug retention rates and to identify factors affecting treatment persistence. A total of 122 patients were enrolled. The CG, SG1 and SG2 2-years retention rates were 51%, 58% and 34% (p = 0.1), respectively. SG1 strategy (HR 0.53; CI 0.31-0.89; p = 0.02), age (HR 0.98; CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.003), Disease Activity PsA (HR 1.11; CI 1.08-1.13; p < 0.0001), year of switch (HR 1.78; CI 1.39-2.22; p < 0.0001) influenced the retention rate. The findings of this real-world study, even if burdened by bias related to its observational nature, support the hypothesis that in PsA patients swapping from TNFi to IL17i might be more effective than cycling TNFis.

Retention Rate of Ixekizumab in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Real-World Study.

We aimed to examine the drug retention rate (DRR) of the interleukin-17 inhibitor ixekizumab in a real-world monocentric cohort of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients and to assess the predictors of drug discontinuation. Consecutive PsA patients who underwent treatment with ixekizumab from October 2019 to February 2023 were enrolled in this observational, retrospective, monocentric study. Clinical records were assessed at baseline and throughout the follow-up period. We collected sociodemographic data, smoking habits, body mass index, the presence of Human Leukocyte Antigen B27, comorbidities, disease involvement and duration, previous therapy, discontinuation of ixekizumab, reasons for discontinuation, and adverse events (AEs). DRR was evaluated as time to drug discontinuation and assessed through Kaplan-Meier curves. Baseline factors predicting drug discontinuation were investigated through logistic regression models. Eighty PsA patients were included in this study. Ixekizumab was administered at a dose of 160 mg by subcutaneous injection at baseline, followed by 80 mg every four weeks thereafter. Ixekizumab had a 38-month-cumulative DRR of 43.8%, accounting for both inefficacy and AEs. When considering only inefficacy, the DRR was 62.6%. Comorbidities (p = 0.665), obesity (p = 0.665), smoking (p = 0.884), disease duration ≤ 2 years (p = 0.071), axial (p = 0.131) and skin involvement (p = 0.460), and previous therapies, including conventional synthetic (p = 0.504) and biological (p = 0.474) Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs), as well as the number of previous bDMARDs or targeted synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (tsDMARDs), did not significantly affect the DRR (p = 0.349). Multivariate analysis found no independent predictors of drug discontinuation. The most frequent AEs leading to discontinuation were skin reactions; no severe infections were observed. In our real-world study, comorbidities, disease duration, and previous therapies did not affect the DRR of ixekizumab. Ixekizumab had a favorable safety profile, with no severe AEs observed.

Four-year effectiveness, safety and drug retention rate of secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis: a real-life Italian multicenter cohort.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate over a 48-month follow-up period the: 1) long-term effectiveness and safety; 2) drug retention rate (DRR); 3) impact of comorbidities and bDMARDs line on MDA and DAPSA remission/low disease activity (LDA) of secukinumab in a multicenter Italian cohort of PsA patients. METHODS: Consecutive PsA patients receiving secukinumab were followed prospectively in Italian centers between 2016 and 2023. Disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities and follow-up duration were recorded. Treatment response was evaluated at 6 and 12 months after initiation, and every year up to 48 months (T48). DRR was assessed according to clinical and demographic features, comorbidities and bDMARDs line. Adverse events (AE) were recorded. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-five patients [42.5% male] were enrolled; 32.9% naïve received secukinumab; 74.2% had ≥ 1 comorbidity. Overall, secukinumab yielded improved outcomes at T48: naïve maintained lower disease activity vs. non-naïve [DAPSA 4.0 (1.4-8.1) vs. 6.0 (2.2-10.4);p = 0.04]; 76.9% naïve and 66.2% non-naïve achieved MDA; MDA no comorbidities vs. 1-3 comorbidities 78.8% vs. 73.3% (p < 0.05), and MDA no comorbidities vs. > 3 comorbidities 78.8% vs. 48.7% (p < 0.001). DAPSA-REM and DAPSA-LDA rates were higher in naïve patients, albeit similar between those without comorbidities vs. 1-3 comorbidities, and slightly lower in those with > 3 comorbidities. Treatment was discontinued in 233 patients due to loss of effectiveness, and in 41 due to AE. The overall DRR at T48 was 66%, with differences according to bDMARDs line (p < 0.001), use of combined csDMARDs (p = 0.016), BMI (p = 0.037) and mono/oligoarthritis vs. polyarthritis (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab proved safe and effective, and patients achieved sustained remission with a notable drug retention rate at 4 years.

Long-term efficacy, safety, and cumulative retention rate of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment for patients with Behcet's uveitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and cumulative retention rate of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy for patients with Behcet's uveitis (BU) using meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science and PubMed databases for eligible studies up to December 1, 2022. The quality of each identified study was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's case series literature quality assessment tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 software with a random-effects model. RESULTS: Twelve studies comprising 1156 patients with BU were included in our analysis. We found that 85.0% of patients achieved ocular inflammation remission after receiving anti-TNF-α treatment, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 78.7% to 90.5%. Additionally, 77.4% (95% CI: 57.5%-92.5%) experienced an improvement in visual acuity (VA). Moreover, the pooled dose reduction of glucocorticoids (GCs) was 11.08 mg (95% CI: -13.34 mg to -8.83 mg). Throughout the follow-up period, the cumulative retention rate of the medication was 67.3% (95% CI: 53.7%-79.6%). Serious adverse events occurred in 5.8% (95% CI: 3.1%-8.9%) of cases, with the three most common types being severe infusion or injection reactions (2.7%; 95% CI: 0.8%-5.4%), tuberculosis (1.3%; 95% CI: 0.0%-3.9%), and bacterial pneumonia (1.3%; 95% CI: 0.1%-3.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed that ocular inflammation remission rates were 89.3% (95% CI: 81.2%-95.5%) for adalimumab treatment and 83.7% (95% CI: 75.3%-90.8%) for infliximab treatment. The drug retention rate after adalimumab therapy was 70.3% (95% CI: 62.0%-78.0%) compared to 66.4% (95% CI: 48.6%-82.2%) for infliximab treatment. Furthermore, the incidence of severe infusion or injection reactions was 2.2% (95% CI: 0.1%-5.8%) following adalimumab treatment and 3.5% (95% CI: 0.7%-7.7%) following infliximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF-α therapy represents an effective treatment for BU patients with favorable safety profile and high drug retention rate and a potential advantage of adalimumab over infliximab in terms of ocular inflammation remission, drug retention, and the incidence of severe infusion or injection reactions.

Effectiveness and Safety of Biosimilars in Pediatric Non-infectious Uveitis: Real-Life Data from the International AIDA Network Uveitis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Since many biological drug patents have expired, biosimilar agents (BIOs) have been developed; however, there are still some reservations in their use, especially in childhood. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors BIOs as treatment for pediatric non-infectious uveitis (NIU). METHODS: Data from pediatric patients with NIU treated with TNF inhibitors BIOs were drawn from the international AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) registries dedicated to uveitis and Behçet's disease. The effectiveness and safety of BIOs were assessed in terms of frequency of relapses, risk for developing ocular flares, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), glucocorticoids (GCs)-sparing effect, drug survival, frequency of ocular complications, and adverse drug event (AE). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (77 affected eyes) were enrolled. The BIOs employed were adalimumab (ADA) (89.4%), etanercept (ETA) (5.3%), and infliximab (IFX) (5.3%). The number of relapses 12 months prior to BIOs and at last follow-up was 282.14 and 52.43 per 100 patients/year. The relative risk of developing ocular flares before BIOs introduction compared to the period following the start of BIOs was 4.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.38-5.98, p = 0.004). The number needed to treat (NNT) for ocular flares was 3.53. Median BCVA was maintained during the whole BIOs treatment (p = 0.92). A significant GCs-sparing effect was observed throughout the treatment period (p = 0.002). The estimated drug retention rate (DRR) at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up were 92.7, 83.3, and 70.8%, respectively. The risk rate for developing structural ocular complications was 89.9/100 patients/year before starting BIOs and 12.7/100 patients/year during BIOs treatment, with a risk ratio of new ocular complications without BIOs of 7.1 (CI 3.4-14.9, p = 0.0003). Three minor AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: TNF inhibitors BIOs are effective in reducing the number of ocular uveitis relapses, preserving visual acuity, allowing a significant GCs-sparing effect, and preventing structural ocular complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05200715.

Four-year real-world experience of secukinumab in a large Italian cohort of axial spondyloarthritis.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate in a real-life Italian multicenter cohort of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) (1) the 4-year effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, (2) the drug retention rate (DRR), and (3) the impact of the line of bDMARDs treatment, subtype of axSpA, and sex on achieving low disease activity (LDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA). Methods: Consecutive axSpA patients receiving secukinumab between 2016 and 2023 were prospectively evaluated. Data on disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities, and follow-up duration were collected. Treatment response was evaluated at 6 and 12 months after initiation and yearly up to 48 months (T48). DRR and effectiveness outcomes were evaluated according to bDMARDs treatment, axSpA subtype, and sex. Infections and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: We enrolled 272 patients (48.2% male; median age, 51; 39.7% HLA-B27+; 40.4% nr-axSpA), of whom 30.9% were naïve to secukinumab. Overall, secukinumab yielded improvement in effectiveness outcomes; the naïve patients maintained lower disease activity vs. the non-naïve ones. At T48, the LDA and VLDA rates were higher in naïve patients and in male individuals. Treatment was discontinued in 104 patients due to primary/secondary loss of effectiveness and in 34 patients due to AEs. The DRR at T48 was 67.4% in the whole population, regardless of treatment line, axSpA subtype, and sex. Conclusions: Secukinumab was safe and effective in all axSpA patients irrespective of treatment line, disease subtype, and sex. The patients achieved sustained 4-year remission and DRR.

Drug Retention Rates of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Therapy-Induced Lymphopenia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether drug-induced lymphocytopenia is associated with drug retention rates of JAKi (tofacitinib or baricitinib) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Patients with RA who were initiated with tofacitinib (n = 38) or baricitinib (n = 74) between July 2015 and July 2022 and continued for at least 4 months were enrolled in this study. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) value was obtained pre-treatment and monthly after initiation of JAKi (up to 4 months). Associations between ALC nadir at an early phase (up to 4 months) from JAKi initiation and drug retention rates were analysed. RESULTS: 112 patients (87 females; age, 71.2 ± 14.0 years; disease duration, 9.2 ± 10.5 months; DAS28-CRP, 3.60 ± 1.12; DAS28-ESR, 4.43 ± 1.29; CDAI, 17.9 ± 12.9; C-reactive protein, 3.07 ± 3.43 mg/dL; and lymphocyte count, 1361.9 ± 538.7 per µL) treated with tofacitinib or baricitinib were retrospectively analysed. Lymphocytopenia (>10% decline in lymphocyte count to pre-treatment basal levels) was observed in a quarter of RA patients treated with JAKi (tofacitinib; 16 baricitinib; 14). RA patients with lymphopenia were associated with the lower drug retention rates of tofacitinib compared to those without lymphocytopenia. The reduced drug retention rates in patients with lymphocytopenia were attributed to the discontinuation of tofacitinib due to AEs. Whereas lymphocytopenia was not associated with lower drug retention rates of baricitinib. Pre-treatment absolute lymphocyte counts did not affect the drug retention rates of JAKi in patients with RA. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that lymphopenia during the first 4 months from the initiation of JAKi is associated with reduced drug retention rates in patients with RA due to AEs, which is exclusively associated with the use of tofacitinib.

Drug Retention Rates and the Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Elderly Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: We examined the real-world drug retention rate and safety data of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This study enrolled 133 RA patients (≥65 years) with sufficient clinical data who were initiated with JAKis during the study period. These patients were divided into two groups: the very elderly group (≥ 75 years) and the elderly group (65 ≤ years < 75). The drug retention rates of JAKis were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The discontinuation rates of JAKis were as follows: lack of effectiveness 27 (20.3%), adverse events (AEs) 29 (21.8%), and remission 2 (1.5%). There was no significant difference in the overall drug retention rate between the very elderly group (≥75 years) and the elderly group. Furthermore, the overall drug retention rates of JAKis were not affected by gender, methotrexate use, and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibody (ACPA) status. The discontinuation rates of JAKis due to AEs were comparable both in the very elderly group (≥75 years) and the elderly group (65 ≤ years < 75). Whereas chronic lung disease and hypoalbuminemia were independently associated with discontinuation rates due to AEs, the overall drug retention rates were significantly lower in patients treated with the approved dose of JAKis than in those treated with a reduced or tapered dose. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the overall drug retention rate of JAKis in very elderly patients (≥75 years) was comparable with that in elderly patients (65 ≤ years < 75). The discontinuation rates of JAKis due to AEs were also comparable both in very elderly group patients and elderly patients.

Real-life drug retention rate and safety of rituximab when treating rheumatic diseases: a single-centre Swiss retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, rituximab (RTX) is licenced for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) but is frequently used off-label to treat other auto-immune diseases (AID), especially connective tissue diseases (CTD). We aimed to characterise the use of RTX in AID in a real-life Swiss setting and compare RTX retention rates and safety outcomes between patients treated for RA, CTD and AAV. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who started RTX in the Rheumatology Department for RA or AID. The RTX retention rate was analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Occurrences of serious adverse events (SAE), low IgG levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were reported. RESULTS: Two hundred three patients were treated with RTX: 51.7% had RA, 29.6% CTD, 9.9% vasculitis and 8.9% other AIDs. The total observation time was 665 patient-years. RTX retention probability at 2 years (95%CI) was similar for RA and CTD 0.65 (0.55 to 0.73), 0.60 (0.47 to 0.72) and lower for vasculitis 0.25 (0.09 to 0.45). Survival curves for RTX retention matched closely (p = 0.97) between RA and CTD patients but were lower for patients with vasculitis due to a higher percentage of induced remission. Patients with vasculitis (95%) and CTD (75%) had a higher rate of concomitant glucocorticoid use than RA (60%). Moderate to severe hypogammaglobulinaemia was observed more frequently in patients with vasculitis (35%) than with RA (13%) or CTD (9%) and was associated with an increased risk of presenting a first infectious SAE (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.91). The incidence rate of SAE was 23.3 SAE/100 patient-years (36% were infectious). When searched, ADAs were observed in 18% of the patients and were detected in 63% of infusions-related SAE. 10 patients died during RTX treatment and up to 12 months after the last RTX infusion, 50% from infection. CONCLUSION: RTX retention rates are similar for patients with RA and CTD but lower for those with vasculitis due to more frequent remission. Patients treated with RTX for vasculitis present more SAE and infectious SAE than patients with RA and CTD, potentially due to a higher use of concomitant glucocorticoids and the occurrence of hypogammaglobulinaemia.

Apremilast retention rate in clinical practice: observations from an Italian multi-center study.

OBJECTIVE: There are few real-world setting studies focused on apremilast effectiveness (i.e., retention rate) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The main aim of this retrospective observational study is the assessment of apremilast 3-year retention rate in real-world PsA patients. Moreover, the secondary objective is to report the reasons of apremilast discontinuation and the factors related to treatment persistence. METHODS: In fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers, all PsA consecutive patients who received apremilast were enrolled. Anamnestic data, treatment history, and PsA disease activity (DAPSA) at baseline were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox analysis computed the apremilast retention rate and treatment persistence-related risk factors. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The 356 enrolled patients (median age 60 [interquartile range IQR 52-67] yrs; male prevalence 42.7%) median observation period was 17 [IQR 7-34] months (7218 patients-months). The apremilast retention rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 85.6%, 73.6%, and 61.8%. The main discontinuation reasons were secondary inefficacy (34% of interruptions), gastro-intestinal intolerance (24%), and primary inefficacy (19%). Age and oligo-articular phenotype were related to treatment persistence (respectively hazard ratio 0.98 IQR 0.96-0.99; p = 0.048 and 0.54 IQR 0.31-0.95; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Almost three-fifths of PsA patients receiving apremilast were still in treatment after 3 years. This study confirmed its effectiveness and safety profile. Apremilast appears as a good treatment choice in all oligo-articular PsA patients and in those ones burdened by relevant comorbidities. Key Points • Apremilast retention rates in this real-life cohort and trials are comparable. • The oligo-articular phenotype is associated with long-lasting treatment (i.e., 3 years). • No different or more prevalent adverse events were observed.

Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in axial spondyloarthritis: a 24-month prospective, multicenter real-life study.

Objectives: To evaluate, in a multicentric Italian cohort of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients on Secukinumab (SEC) followed for 24 months: (1) the long-term effectiveness and safety of SEC; (2) the drug retention rate and low disease activity (LDA) measured as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) < 4/Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) < 2.1 and very low disease activity (VLDA) measured as BASDAI < 2/ASDAS < 1.3; (3) any differences in outcomes according to line of biological treatment (naïve/non-naïve), gender (male/female), subtype of axSpA [radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA)/non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA)]. Methods: Consecutive axSpA patients treated with SEC were evaluated prospectively. Disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities, and follow-up duration were collected. Disease activity/functional/clinimetric scores and biochemical-values were recorded at baseline (T0), 6 (T6), 12 (T12), and 24 (T24) months. Effectiveness was evaluated over-time with descriptive statistics; multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of drug discontinuation and LDA at T6. Infections and adverse events were recorded. Results: A total 249 patients (47.8% male; median age 51) were enrolled; 40.9% had HLA-B27; 53.8% had r-axSpA, and 46.2% nr-axSpA. SEC was prescribed in 28.9% naïve and in 71.1% non-naïve patients. SEC effectiveness was shown as an improvement in several outcomes, such as ASDAS [T0 = 3.5 (2.9-4.4) versus T24 = 1.9 (1.2-2.4); p = 0.02] and BASDAI [T0 = 6.5 (5.0-7.5) versus T24 = 2.8 (1.8-4.0); p = 0.03]. At T24, naïve patients showed better physical functioning and lower disease activity than non-naïve. After 24 months of treatment, 90.7% of naïve and 75.3% of non-naïve patients achieved LDA (BASDAI < 4). Treatment was discontinued in 24.5% patients, mainly due to primary/secondary loss of effectiveness, and in 6.8% due to adverse events. Retention rate at T24 was 75% in the whole population, with some difference depending on gender (p = 0.002). Conclusion: In a real-life clinical setting, SEC proved to be safe and effective in axSpA, mainly in naïve-patients, with a notable drug retention rate. No differences were observed between r-axSpA and nr-axSpA.

Five-years drug survival of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Comparison between renal and non-renal involvement.

OBJECTIVE: The EULAR recommendations underline the use of MMF for Lupus Nephritis (LN) but also for the treatment of moderate/severe non-renal manifestations (NLN). This study aims at evaluating the 5-years drug retention rate (DRR) of MMF in a SLE cohort in a real-life scenario. Secondly, we investigated the MMF influence to control chronic damage progression. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal study including all the SLE patients starting MMF in our Lupus Clinic (from 2008 to 2020). The DRR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: We evaluated 162 SLE patients (M/F 22/140). The most frequent indications for prescribing MMF were LN (101 patients, 62.3%) and musculoskeletal manifestations (39, 24.1%) followed by NPSLE (10, 6.2%) and other manifestations (12, 7.4%). We registered a median treatment duration of 30 months (IQR 55). At 60 months follow-up we observed a DRR of 61.1% for LN patients, which was similar to that registered for patients without renal involvement (60.5%). The DRR was higher in the subgroup of patients with joint involvement (75.4%, P non-significant). During the overall observation period, 92 patients (59.2%) discontinued MMF. The main cause of withdrawal was the achievement of remission, observed in 20 patients (21.7%). Moreover, MMF resulted able to control chronic damage progression, as demonstrated by the lack of significant increase in the median SDI values (baseline: 0.6, IQR 1; last: 0.93, IQR 1). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggested that MMF is a safe and effective drug for SLE manifestations other than LN, especially for joint involvement. Moreover, it was able to control the chronic damage progression.

Ten-Year Retention Rate of Infliximab in Patients with Behçet's Disease-Related Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 10-year drug retention rate of infliximab (IFX) in Behçet's disease (BD)-related uveitis, the effect of a concomitant use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on drug survival and differences according to the lines of biologic treatment. METHODS: Cumulative survival rates were studied using the Kaplan-Meier plot, while the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare survival curves. RESULTS: Forty patients (70 eyes) were eligible for analysis. The drug retention rates at 12-, 24-, 60- and 120-month follow-up were 89.03%, 86.16%, 75.66% and 47.11% respectively. No differences were identified according to the use of concomitant DMARDs (p = 0.20), while a statistically significant difference was observed in relation to the different lines of IFX treatment (p = 0.014). Visual acuity improved from baseline to the last follow-up visit (p = 0.047) and a corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: IFX retention rate in BD-uveitis is excellent and is not affected by concomitant DMARDs.

Long-term retention rates of adalimumab and infliximab in non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis.

The aim of the present study was to compare long-term adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) retention rates in patients with intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. Additional aims are as follows: (i) to identify any difference in the causes of treatment discontinuation between patients treated with ADA and IFX; (ii) to assess any impact of demographic features, concomitant treatments, and different lines of biologic therapy on ADA and IFX retention rates; and (iii) to identify any correlation between ADA and IFX treatment duration and the age at uveitis onset, the age at onset of the associated systemic diseases, and the age at the start of treatment. Clinical, therapeutic, and demographic data from patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis treated with ADA or IFX were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to assess survival curves. One hundred eight patients (188 eyes) were enrolled; in 87 (80.6%) patients, uveitis was associated with a systemic disease. ADA and IFX were administered in 62 and 46 patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates (p value = 0.22). Similarly, no differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates in relation to gender (p value = 0.61 for males, p value = 0.09 for females), monotherapy (p value = 0.08), combination therapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (log-rank p value = 0.63), and different lines of biologic therapy (p value = 0.79 for biologic-naïve patients; p value = 0.81 for subjects previously treated with other biologics). In conclusion, ADA and IFX have similar long-term retention rates in patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic features do not affect their long-term effectiveness.

Two-year abatacept retention rate in clinical practice in the French ACTION cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Abatacept retention rates were evaluated in the French cohort in the prospective ACTION study (2010-2013), which included patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis managed in everyday clinical practice and started on intravenous abatacept therapy. METHODS: Two-year abatacept retention rates were evaluated in 455 patients classified according to treatment line, body mass index (BMI), and status for rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA). RESULTS: After 2 years, the overall abatacept retention rate was 44%. The retention rate was non-significantly higher in the patients with vs. without a history of unresponsiveness to at least one biologic (48.1% vs. 41.8%, respectively). No significant retention rate differences were found across BMI categories (444 patients; <25, 45.5%; ≥25 to <30, 48.9%; and ≥30, 36.6%). Neither were any significant differences demonstrated according to RF and ACPA status (RF+ and ACPA+, 45.7%; RF+ or ACPA+, 43.8%; and FR- and ACPA-, 39.1%). CONCLUSION: The 44% 2-year retention rate in the French ACTION cohort supports the usefulness of abatacept therapy. In this study, retention was not associated with treatment line, BMI, or antibody status.

Anakinra Drug Retention Rate and Predictive Factors of Long-Term Response in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult Onset Still Disease.

Background and Objective: Only a few studies have reported long-term efficacy of interleukin (IL)-1 inhibition in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). Herein we report on the effectiveness of anakinra (ANA), expressed in terms of drug retention rate (DRR), and evaluate the predictive factors of drug survival in a cohort of patients with sJIA and AOSD. Patients and Methods: This is a multicenter study reviewing retrospectively the medical records from 61 patients with sJIA and 76 with AOSD, all treated with ANA in 25 Italian tertiary referral centers. Results: The cumulative retention rate of ANA at 12-, 24-, 48-, and 60-month of follow-up was 74.3%, 62.9%, 49.4%, and 49.4%, respectively, without any significant differences between sJIA and AOSD patients (p = 0.164), and between patients treated in monotherapy compared with the subgroup coadministered with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) (p = 0.473). On the other hand, a significant difference in DRR was found between biologic-naïve patients and those previously treated with biotechnologic drugs (p = 0.009), which persisted even after adjustment for pathology (p = 0.013). In the regression analysis, patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) {hazards ratio (HR) = 3.029 [confidence interval (CI) 1.750-5.242], p < 0.0001} and those previously treated with other biologic agents [HR = 1.818 (CI 1.007-3.282), p = 0.047] were associated with a higher HR of ANA discontinuation. The median treatment delay was significantly higher among patients discontinuing ANA (p < 0.0001). Significant corticosteroid-sparing (p = 0.033) and cDMARD-sparing effects (p < 0.0001) were also recorded. Less than one-third of our cohort developed AEs, and 85% were deemed mild in nature, with 70% of them involving the skin. Conclusions: Our findings display an overall excellent DRR of ANA on the long run for both sJIA and AOSD, that may be further optimized by closely monitoring patient's safety issues and employing this IL-1 inhibitor as a first-line biologic as early as possible. Moreover, ANA allowed a significant drug-sparing effect and showed an overall good safety profile.