Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 55(1): 15-19, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31503365

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether elective preterm delivery (ED) at 34 weeks is of postnatal benefit to infants with isolated gastroschisis compared with routine obstetric care (RC). METHODS: Between May 2013 and September 2015, all women with a sonographic diagnosis of fetal gastroschisis referred to a single tertiary center, before 34 weeks' gestation, were invited to participate in this study. Eligible patients were randomized to ED (induction of labor at 34 weeks) or RC (spontaneous labor or delivery by 37-38 weeks, based on standard obstetric indications). The primary outcome measure was length of time on total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Secondary outcomes were time to closure of gastroschisis and length of stay in hospital. Outcome variables were compared using appropriate statistical methods. Analysis was based on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Twenty-five women were assessed for eligibility, of whom 21 (84%; 95% CI, 63.9-95.5%) agreed to participate in the study; of these, 10 were randomized to ED and 11 to RC. The trial was stopped at the first planned interim analysis due to patient safety concerns and for futility; thus, only 21 of the expected 86 patients (24.4%; 95% CI, 15.8-34.9%) were enrolled. Median gestational age at delivery was 34.3 (range, 34-36) weeks in the ED group and 36.7 (range, 27-38) weeks in the RC group. One patient in the ED group delivered at 36 weeks following unsuccessful induction at 34 weeks. Neonates of women who underwent ED, compared to those in the RC group, showed no difference in the median number of days on TPN (54 (range, 17-248) vs 21 (range, 9-465) days; P = 0.08), number of days to closure of gastroschisis (7 (range, 0-15) vs 5 (range, 0-8) days; P = 0.28) and length of stay in hospital (70.5 (range, 22-137) vs 31 (range, 19-186) days; P = 0.15). However, neonates in the ED group were significantly more likely to experience late-onset sepsis compared with those in the RC group (40% (95% CI, 12.2-73.8%) vs 0%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates no benefit of ED of fetuses with gastroschisis when postnatal gastroschisis management is similar to that used in routine care. Rather, the data suggest that ED is detrimental to infants with gastroschisis. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Parto inducido a las 34 semanas versus atención obstétrica rutinaria en la gastrosquisis fetal: ensayo controlado aleatorizado OBJETIVO: Evaluar si el parto pretérmino inducido (PI) a las 34 semanas es beneficioso para los recién nacidos con gastrosquisis aislada en comparación con la atención obstétrica rutinaria (AR). MÉTODOS: Entre mayo de 2013 y septiembre de 2015, se invitó a participar en este estudio a todas las mujeres con diagnóstico ecográfico de gastrosquisis fetal remitidas a un mismo centro terciario, antes de las 34 semanas de gestación. Las pacientes elegibles fueron asignadas al azar al PI (inducción del parto a las 34 semanas) o a la AR (parto espontáneo a las 37-38 semanas, en función de los indicios obstétricos estándar). La medida de resultado primaria fue la duración de la nutrición parenteral total (NPT). Las medidas de resultado secundarias fueron el tiempo hasta el cierre de la gastrosquisis y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria. Las variables de resultado se compararon mediante métodos estadísticos apropiados. El análisis se basó en la intención de tratar. RESULTADOS: Se evaluó la elegibilidad de 25 mujeres, de las cuales 21 (84%; IC 95%, 63,9-95,5%) aceptaron participar en el estudio; de ellas, 10 fueron asignadas al azar al PI y 11 a la AR. El ensayo se detuvo después del primer análisis provisional planificado debido a preocupaciones sobre la seguridad de las pacientes y por su intrascendencia; por lo tanto, sólo se reclutaron 21 de las 86 pacientes esperadas (24,4%; IC 95%, 15,8-34,9%). La mediana de la edad gestacional en el momento del parto fue de 34,3 (rango: 34-36) semanas en el grupo de PI y 36,7 (rango: 27-38) semanas en el grupo de AR. Una paciente del grupo de PI tuvo un parto a las 36 semanas, después de una inducción infructuosa a las 34 semanas. Los neonatos de las mujeres que se sometieron a PI, comparados con los del grupo de AR, no mostraron diferencias en la mediana del número de días de NPT (54 (rango: 17-248) vs 21 (rango: 9-465) días; P=0,08), número de días hasta el cierre de la gastrosquisis (7 (rango: 0-15) vs 5 (rango: 0-8) días; P=0,28) y duración de la estancia hospitalaria (70,5 (rango: 22-137) vs 31 (rango: 19-186) días; P=0,15). Sin embargo, la probabilidad de experimentar sepsis de inicio tardío fue mayor en los neonatos del grupo de PI en comparación el grupo de AR (40% (IC 95%, 12,2-73,8%) vs 0%; P=0,03). CONCLUSIÓN: Este estudio demuestra que el PI no presenta ningún beneficio para los fetos con gastrosquisis cuando el tratamiento de la gastrosquisis postnatal es similar al utilizado en la atención rutinaria. Más bien, los datos sugieren que el PI es perjudicial para los lactantes con gastrosquisis.


Assuntos
Gastrosquise/diagnóstico , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Gastrosquise/diagnóstico por imagem , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Adulto Jovem
2.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 45(3): 137-144, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29734172

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Fetuses with "high-risk" sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) have a mortality rate of 40-50%. While fetal surgery may benefit select fetuses prior to 27 weeks' gestation, many fetuses die due to consequences of rapid tumor growth after 27 weeks. Here we report our experience applying "preemptive" delivery to fetuses who manifest signs of decompensation between 27 and 32 weeks. METHODS: A retrospective review of SCT fetuses delivered between 2010 and 2016 at ≤32 weeks' gestation was performed. Patients who decompensated prior to 27 weeks and were treated with fetal surgery or neonatal palliation were excluded. RESULTS: Forty-two SCT fetuses were evaluated, and 11 were preemptively delivered in response to impending fetal or maternal decompensation. Nine (81.8%) survived. One death was due to pulmonary hypoplasia in a neonate with significant intra-abdominal tumor burden, and the other was due to in utero tumor rupture. There were no deaths related to prematurity in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Many fetuses with SCT manifest signs of decompensation between 27 and 32 weeks. In the absence of fetal hydrops prior to 27 weeks or tumor rupture in utero, early delivery is associated with favorable outcomes. Our single-center experience supports a management algorithm change to incorporate "preemptive" delivery for selected cases.


Assuntos
Doenças Fetais/cirurgia , Região Sacrococcígea/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Teratoma/cirurgia , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Doenças Fetais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Fetais/patologia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Região Sacrococcígea/diagnóstico por imagem , Região Sacrococcígea/patologia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Teratoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Teratoma/patologia , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal
3.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 13: 1015622, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36313741

RESUMO

Survivors of preterm birth struggle with multitudes of disabilities due to improper in utero programming of various tissues and organ systems contributing to adult-onset diseases at a very early stage of their lives. Therefore, the persistent rates of low birth weight (birth weight < 2,500 grams), as well as rates of neonatal and maternal morbidities and mortalities, need to be addressed. Active research throughout the years has provided us with multiple theories regarding the risk factors, initiators, biomarkers, and clinical manifestations of spontaneous preterm birth. Fetal organs, like the placenta and fetal membranes, and maternal tissues and organs, like the decidua, myometrium, and cervix, have all been shown to uniquely respond to specific exogenous or endogenous risk factors. These uniquely contribute to dynamic changes at the molecular and cellular levels to effect preterm labor pathways leading to delivery. Multiple intervention targets in these different tissues and organs have been successfully tested in preclinical trials to reduce the individual impacts on promoting preterm birth. However, these preclinical trial data have not been effectively translated into developing biomarkers of high-risk individuals for an early diagnosis of the disease. This becomes more evident when examining the current global rate of preterm birth, which remains staggeringly high despite years of research. We postulate that studying each tissue and organ in silos, as how the majority of research has been conducted in the past years, is unlikely to address the network interaction between various systems leading to a synchronized activity during either term or preterm labor and delivery. To address current limitations, this review proposes an integrated approach to studying various tissues and organs involved in the maintenance of normal pregnancy, promotion of normal parturition, and more importantly, contributions towards preterm birth. We also stress the need for biological models that allows for concomitant observation and analysis of interactions, rather than focusing on these tissues and organ in silos.


Assuntos
Trabalho de Parto Prematuro , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Adulto , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/etiologia , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/metabolismo , Placenta/metabolismo , Miométrio , Biomarcadores/metabolismo
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 32(3): 434-441, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28922969

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The risk of stillbirth associated with maternal obesity increases with gestational age; however, it is unclear if earlier delivery reduces the overall perinatal mortality rate. Our objective was to compare the risk of perinatal mortality associated with each additional week of expectant management to that of immediate delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton non-anomalous births in Texas between 2006 and 2011. Analyses were stratified based on maternal pre-pregnancy BMI class. For each BMI class, we calculated the rate of neonatal death and stillbirth at each week of gestation from 34 to 41 weeks. A composite risk of perinatal mortality associated with 1 week of expectant management was estimated combining the stillbirth rate of the current week and the neonatal death rate of the following week. This was compared with the rate of neonatal death of the current week. RESULTS: After all exclusions, 2,149,771 births remained for analysis. In the normal weight group, stillbirth risk increased from 0.8 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 5.7 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, whereas the neonatal death risk decreased from 76.5 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 30.4 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, there were no differences between expectant management and delivery for any gestational week. In the obese group, stillbirth risk increased from 1.8 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 10.5 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, whereas the neonatal death risk decreased from 67.7 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 26.2 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, the perinatal mortality risk favored delivery at 39 weeks (RR: 1.17; 99% CI: 1.01-1.36) and not thereafter. In contrast, in the morbidly obese group, stillbirth risk increased from 8.8 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 83.7 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, whereas the neonatal death risk decreased from 63.6 per 10,000 births at 34 weeks to 15.5 per 10,000 births at 42 weeks, the perinatal mortality risk favored delivery from 38 weeks (RR: 1.53; 99% CI: 1.16-2.02) through 41 weeks (RR: 5.39; 99% CI: 1.83-15.88). CONCLUSION: The findings reported here suggest that delivery by 38 weeks in gestation minimizes perinatal mortality in pregnancies complicated by maternal morbid obesity.


Assuntos
Obesidade/mortalidade , Obesidade/terapia , Morte Perinatal/etiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/mortalidade , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Conduta Expectante , Adulto , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Obesidade/complicações , Mortalidade Perinatal , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Natimorto/epidemiologia , Texas/epidemiologia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 233: 30-37, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30553135

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial with intent-to-treat analysis, at 19 tertiary-care hospitals in France and 1 in Geneva, Switzerland. Inclusion criteria were women age ≥18 years, PPROM at 280/7 to 316/7 weeks' gestation, singleton pregnancy. Exclusion criteria were maternal/fetal indications for immediate delivery. All participants received prophylactic antibiotics (amoxicillin + gentamicin) and two doses of corticosteroids. Women in expectant management delivered at 34 weeks, sooner if medically indicated. Women in active management delivered 24 h after the second steroid dose. The primary outcome measure was a composite of neonatal death/severe adverse events: periventricular leukomalacia, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, oxygen requirement at 36 weeks, and necrotizing enterocolitis. The secondary outcome was clinical chorioamnionitis. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely, due to recruitment difficulties. Of 360 women assessed, 139 (40% of calculated sample size) were randomized: 70 to expectant management, 69 to active management. Mean gestational age at PPROM was similar in both groups (30 ± 1.3 vs. 30.2 ± 1.2 weeks, respectively). There were 35 cases of medical/suspected complications requiring delivery in expectant management vs. 4 in active management. Mean latency between PPROM and delivery was 11.7 ± 9.8 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 days, respectively; P < 0.0001 (median 8.4 (1.8-44.2) vs. 2.7 (1.9-4.3)). There were more caesarean deliveries in active than expectant management (80% vs. 60%, respectively; P < 0.01). There were 2 chorioamnionitis cases, both in expectant management. One baby died in expectant management; 2 in active management (one with heart defect). There was no significant difference in sepsis rates. The combined neonatal death/severe adverse events measure was 12.9% for expectant management and 13.0% for active management (OR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.33-2.93, P = 0.97). CONCLUSION: For PPROM at 28-32 weeks, and with antenatal antibiotic and steroid therapy, there were no observed differences in neonatal health when comparing expectant management to early delivery. As expected, expectant management resulted in higher gestational age and birth weight. However, our study was underpowered to draw firm and reliable conclusions.


Assuntos
Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/terapia , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Conduta Expectante , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Término Precoce de Ensaios Clínicos , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Tocolíticos/administração & dosagem
6.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(10): 1273-9, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26313609

RESUMO

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is the most common liver disease during pregnancy, characterized by otherwise unexplained pruritus in late second and third trimester of pregnancy and elevated bile acids and/or transaminases. ICP is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes for the fetus and the later development of hepatobiliary disease for the mother. Bile acids should be monitored throughout pregnancy since fetal risk is increased at serum bile acids >40 µmol/l. Management of ICP consists of treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid, which reduces pruritus. Early elective delivery is common practice but should be performed on an individualized basis as long as strong evidence supporting this practice is lacking. Mothers should be followed-up for normalization of liver function tests 6-12 weeks after delivery. Future research in large-scale studies is needed to address the impact of ursodeoxycholic acid and early elective delivery on fetal outcome.


Assuntos
Colagogos e Coleréticos/uso terapêutico , Colestase Intra-Hepática/terapia , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Prurido/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Ácidos e Sais Biliares/sangue , Colestase Intra-Hepática/sangue , Colestase Intra-Hepática/complicações , Feminino , Morte Fetal/etiologia , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido , Inibidores da Síntese de Ácido Nucleico/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/sangue , Nascimento Prematuro/etiologia , Prurido/etiologia , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Vitamina K/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa