Current Treatment Options: Uterine Sarcoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: The cornerstone of treatment for uterine sarcoma, regardless of histologic type, remains en bloc surgical resection with total hysterectomy. In the case of incidental diagnosis during another procedure, such as myomectomy, where a hysterectomy was not performed initially, completion hysterectomy or cervical remnant removal is recommended. The completion of additional surgical procedures, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy, remains nuanced. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy remains controversial in the setting of most subtypes of uterine sarcoma, except in the case of hormone-receptor positivity, such as in low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, where it is indicated as part of definitive surgical treatment. In the absence of apparent nodal involvement, we do not recommend performing universal lymphadenectomy for patients with sarcoma. We recommend systemic therapy for patients with extra-uterine or advanced stage disease, high-grade histology, and recurrence. The most active chemotherapy regimens for advanced, high-grade disease remain doxorubicin or gemcitabine and docetaxol combination therapy. A notable exception is low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, where we recommend anti-hormonal therapy in the front-line setting. Radiation therapy is reserved for selected cases where it can aid in palliating symptoms.

ATM, BLM, and CDH1 gene co-mutations in a high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma patient with multiple abdominal cavity metastases: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS) is a rare malignant tumor with poor prognosis. To overcome the limitations of current treatment for advanced patients, the intervention of targeted drug therapy is urgently needed. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old married woman who presented with abdominal distension and lower abdominal pain was admitted to Hebei General Hospital. After surgery, immunohistochemical staining revealed a malignant tumor which was consistent with HG-ESS. Tumor recurrence occurred 2 months after surgery. Then the patient underwent chemotherapy with two courses but responded poorly. Subsequently we observed ATM, BLM, and CDH1 co-mutations by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Then the patient received pamiparib, which resulted in a 10-month progression-free survival (PFS) and is now stable with the administration of sintilimab in combination with pamiparib and anlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the successful use of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) on HG-ESS, we suggest that the selection of effective targeted drugs combined with anti- programmed death-1 (PD-1) drug therapy based on genetic testing may become a new option for the treatment of homologous repair deficient (HR-deficient) HG-ESS.

Expanding the molecular spectrum of gene fusions in endometrial stromal sarcoma: Novel subunits of the chromatin remodeling complexes PRC2 and NuA4/TIP60 as alternative fusion partners.

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are morphologically and molecularly heterogeneous. We report novel gene fusions (EPC1::EED, EPC1::EZH2, ING3::PHF1) identified by targeted RNA sequencing in five cases. The ING3::PHF1-fusion positive ESS presented in a 58-year-old female as extrauterine mesocolonic, ovarian masses, and displayed large, monomorphic ovoid-to-epithelioid cells arranged in solid sheets. The patient remained alive with disease 13 months after surgery. The three ESS with EPC1::EED occurred in the uterine corpus in patients with a median age of 58 years (range 27-62 years). One tumor showed a uniform epithelioid nested morphology, while the other two were composed of monomorphic spindle cells in fascicles with elevated mitotic figures, focal tumor cell necrosis, and lymphovascular invasion. At a median follow-up of 20 months, two patients developed local recurrence, including one with concomitant distant metastasis, while one patient remained free of disease. All three patients were alive at the last follow-up. The EPC1::EZH2-fusion positive ESS presented in a 52-year-old female in the uterus, and displayed uniform spindled cells arranged in short fascicles, with focally elevated mitotic activity but without necrosis. The patient remained free of disease 3 months after surgery. All cases were diffusely positive for CD10; four diffusely express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Our study expands the molecular spectrum of EPC1 and PHF1-related gene fusions in ESS to include additional novel subunits of the PRC2 and/or NuA4/TIP60 complexes. These cases displayed a monomorphic epithelioid or spindled phenotype, spanning low-grade and high-grade cytomorphology, all expressing CD10 and commonly ER and PR, and are prone to local and/or distant spread.

Characteristic of Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma by Algorithm of Potential Biomarkers for Uterine Mesenchymal Tumor.

The benign tumor uterine leiomyoma (UL) develops from the smooth muscle tissue that constitutes the uterus, whereas malignant tumor uterine sarcoma develops from either the smooth muscle tissue or stroma and is different from UL and endometrial cancer. Uterine sarcoma is broadly classified into three types: uterine leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), and carcinosarcoma. Although uterine leiomyosarcoma and ESS are both classified as uterine sarcoma, they significantly differ in terms of their sites of occurrence, symptoms, and treatment methods. Uterine leiomyosarcoma develops from the muscle tissue constituting the wall of the uterus and accounts for approximately 70% of all uterine sarcoma cases. In contrast, ESS develops from the stromal tissue beneath the endometrium and accounts for approximately 25% of all uterine sarcoma cases. ESS is classified as either low grade (LG) or high grade (HG). This case report aimed to highlight the importance of histopathologic examinations based on surgical specimens. Herein, we reported the case of a 45-year-old woman suspected of having submucosal leiomyoma of the uterus based on imaging results. Transvaginal ultrasonography and endometrial biopsy or partial dilation and curettage were performed. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 32-mm mass projecting from the posterior wall of the uterus into the uterine cavity. T2-weighted imaging revealed a low signal within the mass; thus, submucosal UL was suspected. Histopathologic examination of surgical specimens obtained from a patient suspected of having submucosal UL after contrast-enhanced MRI indicated that the patient had ESS. Despite the remarkable advancements in medical imaging technology, the accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI for detecting uterine mesenchymal tumors is limited. Therefore, histopathologic diagnosis based on surgical specimens should be performed when medical grounds for diagnosing a benign tumor on contrast-enhanced MRI are lacking.

High-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas With YWHAE::NUTM2 Gene Fusion Exhibit Recurrent CDKN2A Alterations and Absence of p16 Staining is a Poor Prognostic Marker.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (HGESSs) are aggressive uterine tumors harboring oncogenic fusion proteins. We performed a molecular study of 36 HGESSs with YWHAE::NUTM2 gene fusion, assessing co-occurring genetic events, and showed that these tumors frequently harbor recurrent events involving the CDKN2A locus on chromosome 9p. Using array-based copy number profiling and CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization, we identified homozygous and hemizygous deletions of CDKN2A in 18% and 14% of tumors (n = 22 analyzed), respectively. While all YWHAE-rearranged HGESSs with retained disomy for CDKN2A were immunohistochemically positive for p16INK4 (p16), all tumors with homozygous deletion of CDKN2A showed complete absence of p16 staining. Of the 2 tumors with a hemizygous deletion of CDKN2A, 1 showed diffuse and strong p16 positivity, whereas the other showed complete absence of staining. In the p16-negative case, we did not find intragenic mutations or DNA promoter methylation to explain the p16 protein loss, implicating other mechanisms in the regulation of protein expression. In our cohort, subclonal or complete absence of p16 staining was associated with worse overall survival compared with positive p16 staining (1-year overall survival: 28.6% vs 90.7%, respectively; n = 32; P < .001), with all 7 patients in the p16-negative group having succumbed to their disease within 2 years of diagnosis. Our results suggested CDKN2A alterations as a cooperative driver of tumorigenesis in a subset of HGESSs with the YWHAE::NUTM2 gene fusion and showed p16 to be a potential prognostic marker.

The KAT6B::KANSL1 Fusion Defines a New Uterine Sarcoma With Hybrid Endometrial Stromal Tumor and Smooth Muscle Tumor Features.

Neoplasms harboring a KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion were initially reported as benign (leiomyomas) and malignant (leiomyosarcomas, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas [LG-ESSs]) uterine neoplasms. However, they may represent an emerging entity characterized by clinical aggressiveness contrasting with a rather reassuring microscopic appearance. Here, we aimed to confirm that this neoplasm is a distinct clinicopathologic and molecular sarcoma and identify criteria that should alert pathologists and lead to KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion testing in routine practice. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study, including array comparative genomic hybridization, whole RNA-sequencing, unsupervised clustering, and cDNA mutational profile analyses of 16 tumors with KAT6B::KANSL1 fusion from 12 patients. At presentation, patients were peri-menopausal (median, 47.5 years), and the primary tumors were located in the uterine corpus (12/12, 100%), with an additional prevesical location in 1 (8.3%) of 12 cases. The relapse rate was 33.3% (3/9). All tumors (16/16, 100%) showed morphologic and immunohistochemical features overlapping between leiomyoma and endometrial stromal tumors. A whirling recurrent architecture (resembling fibromyxoid-ESS/fibrosarcoma) was found in 13 (81.3%) of 16 tumors. All tumors (16/16, 100%) exhibited numerous arterioliform vessels, and 13 (81.3%) of 18 had large hyalinized central vessels and collagen deposits. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were expressed in 16 (100%) of 16 and 14 (87.5%) of 16 tumors, respectively. Array comparative genomic hybridization performed on 10 tumors classified these neoplasms as simple genomic sarcomas. Whole RNA-sequencing on 16 samples and clustering analysis on primary tumors found that the KAT6B::KANSL1 fusion always occurred between exons 3 of KAT6B and 11 of KANSL1; no pathogenic variant was identified on cDNA, all neoplasms clustered together, close to LG-ESS, and pathway enrichment analysis showed cell proliferation and immune infiltrate recruitment pathway involvement. These results confirm that the sarcomas harboring a KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion represent a distinct clinicopathologic entity, close to LG-ESS but different, with clinical aggressiveness despite a reassuring morphology, for which the KAT6B/A::KANSL1 fusion is the molecular driver alteration.

Endometrial stromal tumors of the uterus: Epidemiology, pathological and biological features, treatment options and clinical outcomes.

Endometrial stromal tumors (EST) are uterine mesenchymal tumors, which histologically resemble endometrial stroma of the functioning endometrium. The majority of EST are malignant tumors classified as low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). Overall, ESTs are rare malignancies, with an annual incidence of approximately 0.30 per 100'000 women, mainly affecting peri- or postmenopausal women. The most common genetic alteration identified in LG-ESS is the JAZF1-SUZ12 rearrangement, while t(10;17)(q23,p13) translocation and BCOR gene abnormalities characterize two major subtypes of HG-ESS. The absence of specific genetic abnormalities is the actual hallmark of UUS. Unlike HG-ESSs, LG-ESSs usually express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Total hysterectomy without morcellation and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is the first-line treatment of early-stage LG-ESS. Ovarian preservation, fertility-sparing treatment, and adjuvant hormonal therapy ± radiotherapy may be an option in selected cases. In advanced or recurrent LG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction followed by hormonal treatment, or vice versa, are acceptable treatments. The standard treatment for apparently early-stage HG-ESS and UUS is total hysterectomy without morcellation with BSO. Ovarian preservation and adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiotherapy may be an option. In advanced or recurrent HG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy can be considered. Alternative treatments, including biological agents and immunotherapy, are under investigation. LG-ESSs are indolent tumor with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 80-100% and present as stage I-II at diagnosis in two third of patients. HG-ESSs carry a poor prognosis, with a median OS ranging from 11 to 24 months, and 70% of patients are in stage III-IV at presentation. UUS median OS ranges from 12 to 23 months and, at diagnosis, 70% of patients are in stage III-IV. The aim of this review is to assess the clinical, pathological, and biological features and the therapeutic options for malignant ESTs.

Prognostic factors and survival of patients with uterine sarcoma: a German unicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: Uterine sarcoma (US) as a histologically heterogeneous group of tumors is rare and associated with poor prognosis. Prognostic factors based on systematic data collection need to be identified to optimize patients' treatment. METHODS: This unicenter, retrospective cohort study includes 57 patients treated at the University Hospital Freiburg, Germany between 1999 and 2017. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and visualized in Kaplan-Meier curves. Prognostic factors were identified using log-rank test and Cox regression. RESULTS: 44 Leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 7 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), 4 high-grade ESS and 2 undifferentiated US patients were identified. The median age at time of diagnosis was 51.0 years (range 18-83). The median follow-up time was 35 months. PFS for the total cohort was 14.0 (95%-Confidence-Interval (CI) 9.7-18.3) and OS 36.0 months (95%-CI 22.1-49.9). Tumor pathology was prognostically significant for OS with LG-ESS being the most favorable (mean OS 150.3 months). In the multivariate analysis, patients over 52 years showed a four times higher risk for tumor recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 4.4; 95%-CI 1.5-12.9). Progesterone receptor negativity was associated with a two times higher risk for death (HR 2.8; 95%-CI 1.0-7.5). For LMS patients age ≥ 52 years (p = 0.04), clear surgical margins (p = 0.01), FIGO stage (p = 0.01) and no application of chemotherapy (p = 0.02) were statistically significant factors for OS. CONCLUSION: Tumor histology, age at time of diagnosis and progesterone receptor status were prognostic factors for US. Unfavorable OS in LMS patients was associated with advanced FIGO stage, suboptimal cytoreduction and application of chemotherapy.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma-like tumors in male with JAZF1 gene fusions.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a hormone-responsive low-grade sarcoma typically occurring in the uterine corpus in women. Their genetic hallmarks are recurrent gene fusions involving JAZF1, partnering with either SUZ12 gene or less commonly with PHF1. Low-grade ESS-like sarcoma, or endometrioid stromal sarcoma, is exceptionally rare in males and has been reported to date only in two cases, one in the paratesticular area and the other of prostatic stromal origin. We report herein two new cases of low-grade ESS-like sarcoma in male patients, one presenting as a periprostatic/peri-rectal mass with a JAZF1-GLI3 fusion, while the other as a paratesticular mass with a JAZF1-PHF1 fusion. As the GLI3 fusion appeared novel, we searched the transcriptional signature of 35 low-grade ESS from our archives and found a similar JAZF1-GLI3 fusion in a low-grade ESS arising from the uterine corpus, supporting a common pathogenesis. Histopathologically, both cases demonstrate cellular, monotonous proliferation of ovoid to fusiform cells with a background of arteriolar vascular network. Immunohistochemically, the neoplastic cells express ER, PR, and CD10, similar to ESS. One case also expresses diffuse and strong AR. On follow-up, the patient with the periprostatic mass recurred 2 years after initial surgery with peritoneal "sarcomatosis." We describe the salient diagnostic morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features and discuss the differential diagnosis and possible pathogenesis of this unusual entity.

JAZF1, YWHAE and BCOR gene translocation in primary extrauterine low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas.

AIMS: JAZF1 translocation is the most common genetic change in low-grade (LG) endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), and YWHAE and BCOR translocations are common in high-grade (HG) ESS. Primary extrauterine ESS is rare, and there are limited data on molecular alterations in these tumours. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cases of primary extrauterine ESS, comprising eight LG-ESS cases and five HG-ESS cases were collected. Haematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining were used to observe the histomorphology and analyse related protein expression. JAZF1, YWHAE and BCOR rearrangements were explored with fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH). In LG-ESS, the tumour cells resembled normal proliferative-phase endometrial stromal cells; CD10, oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor were expressed in all eight cases. In HG-ESS, the tumour cells had uniform HG round and/or spindle morphology, sometimes with an LG component; CD10 was fully expressed in one case and focally expressed in four cases; BCOR was expressed in all five cases, and cyclin D1 in four of five cases. FISH analysis showed JAZF1 translocation in one of eight LG-ESS cases (12.5%). YWHAE translocation occurred in four of five HG-ESS cases, with a positivity rate of 80%. BCOR translocation was absent in all five cases. CONCLUSIONS: In extrauterine LG-ESS, the rate of JAZF1 rearrangement was significantly lower than in uterine LG-ESS. This result limited the value of JAZF1 translocation for diagnosis. YWHAE rearrangement is a common genetic change in extrauterine HG-ESS. Further studies are required to confirm these findings, especially in LG-ESS.

Uterine sarcomas and rare uterine mesenchymal tumors with malignant potential. Diagnostic guidelines of the French Sarcoma Group and the Rare Gynecological Tumors Group.

The landscape of uterine sarcomas is becoming increasingly complex with the description of new entities associated with recurrent molecular alterations. Uterine sarcomas, as well as soft tissue sarcomas, can be distinguished into complex genomic sarcomas and simple genomic sarcomas. Leiomyosarcoma and pleomorphic type undifferentiated uterine sarcoma belong to the first group. Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, NTRK, COL1A1::PDGFB, ALK, RET, ROS1 associated sarcomas, and SMARCA4 deficient uterine sarcoma belong to the second group. Leiomyosarcoma is the most common uterine sarcoma followed by endometrial stromal sarcomas. Three different histologic subtypes of leiomyosarcomas are recognized with distinct diagnostic criteria and different clinical outcomes, the myxoid and epithelioid leiomyosarcomas being even more aggressive than the fusiform type. The distinction between low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is based first on morphology and immunohistochemistry. The detection of fusion transcripts helps in the diagnosis. Definitely recognized as a separate entity, uterine PEComa is a rare tumor whose diagnostic criteria are being recently defined. Uterine PEComa has a specific algorithm stratifying the tumors into uncertain malignant potential and malignant tumors. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas of the uterine cervix are not restricted to children but can also be observed in adult women and are almost always DICER1 mutated, unlike embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the vagina which are DICER1wild-type, and adenosarcoma which can be DICER1 mutated but with less frequency. As sarcomas associated with fusion transcripts involving the NTRK, ALK, COL1A1::PDGFB genes can benefit from targeted therapy, systematic detection are now relevant especially for patients with high risk of relapse or in recurrent setting. The integration of molecular data with dedicated expert pathology review for histology and clinical data allows better identification of uterine sarcomas in order to better treat them.

Endometrial stromal tumors: Diagnostic updates and challenges.

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine mesenchymal tumors of endometrial stromal origin. They are classified into endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma by the current (2020) WHO classification. Correct diagnosis of endometrial stromal tumors is critical for proper patient management. However, due to infrequent encounters, overlapping morphological features and immunohistochemical profiles, the differential diagnoses among endometrial stromal lesions and their morphologic mimics are often challenging. Partially with our own experience, here we review and summarize the tumor morphology, immunohistochemical phenotype, as well as molecular feature of endometrial stromal tumors and key differential diagnoses, emphasizing the newest developments and their utilization in daily practice.

Primary low-grade extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: analysis of 10 cases with a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the clinical and pathological features of extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (EESS) and explore an effective therapeutic regimen to reduce the recurrence rate in low-grade EESS patients. METHODS: Ten LG-EESS patients who were treated at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Institute and Hospital from June 1999 to June 2019 were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: (1) Patient demographics are summarized in manuscript. Preoperative CA125 examination showed that 8 patients had a median level of 49.5 U/L (15.4-168.0 U/L). (2) All ten patients underwent tumor cytoreductive surgery. Five patients underwent optimal tumor resection and achieved an R0 resection. After the initial surgery, 7 patients who had multiple metastasis were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 patients with vaginal ESS were treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and 6 patients with ER/PR positive received hormone therapy with or without chemotherapy. (2) Most EESS patients had multiple tumors. The omentum was the most commonly affected site, followed by the ovaries. (3) The median follow-up was 94 (range: 27-228) months, and recurrence was observed in 3 patients (n = 10, 30%) who underwent non-optimal surgery and no hormone therapy. The 5-year and 10-year DFS rates were both 70%, as shown in Fig. 2. OS was both 100% at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSION: As a conclusion, EESS is a rare disease and LG-EESS has a good prognosis. Surgery remains the available treatment for patients. LG-EESS has a risk of late recurrence which requires a long-term follow-up. With a limited sample size, our study shows optimal tumor reductive surgery and adjuvant hormone therapy may significantly reduce the risk of recurrence.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with intracaval or intracardiac extension: a retrospective study of eight cases.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to improve the knowledge of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) with intracaval or intracardiac extension and tried to identify the potential risk factors and optimal treatment method influencing prognosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of eight LG-ESS patients with intracaval or intracardiac extension who underwent treatment at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2012 and 2020. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 44 years, ranging from 28 to 56 years. Abnormal uterine bleeding was the most common intimal symptom (3/8), followed by low back discomfort (2/8), edema of the lower limbs (2/8), abdominal pain (1/8), and dyspnea (1/8). All patients underwent resection of the intravascular and extravascular portions of the tumor. Two patients were in stage IIIC, and six were in stage IVB. After surgery, four patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, of whom three also received letrozole. One patient was treated with letrozole alone, and one patient received medroxyprogesterone. The average follow-up time was 34.5 months, ranging from 6 to 98 months. No patients died or relapsed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: LG-ESS with intracaval or intracardiac extension is an uncommon type of tumor which is easily misdiagnosed and can only be diagnosed by histological evaluation after surgery. Complete tumoral excision followed by adjuvant therapy may benefit patient survival time. Long-term follow-up is essential due to the high rate of late recurrence.

Extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: A systematic review and outcome analysis.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is the second most common uterine mesenchymal neoplasm. ESS can arise from extrauterine locations without any uterine involvement and is called extrauterine ESS (EESS). The epidemiological features of EESS are not well-known. Moreover, the factors affecting its outcome have not been systemically studied. The treatment of EESS closely follows that of uterine ESS, comprised of different combinations of surgical management, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. However, the effectiveness of different treatment protocols for EESS has not been studied. Here, we have performed a systematic review of all reported cases of EESS in the English literature. We further performed a meta-analysis of the outcome data and investigated how the patients' age, tumor site, tumor size, and management affect the overall and progression-free survival of the patients. We found that tumor site and mode of treatment significantly affected the overall survival and progression-free survival of the patients. Tumor size significantly affected overall survival but not progression-free survival, while the age at diagnosis did not affect patient outcome. As far as we know, ours is the first systematic study of this rare malignancy with an emphasis on outcome analysis.

Molecular pathogenesis and prognostication of "low-grade'' and "high-grade" endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal cancers. Considerable knowledge has been gained in recent years about the molecular characteristics of these cancers, which helps to classify them in a more meaningful manner leading to improved diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment. According to this classification, ESS is now grouped as low- or high-grade. ESS may have overlapping clinical presentation, morphology, and immunohistochemical profile. Their genetic characteristics allow subdivision of many of them depending on which pathogenetically important fusion genes they carry, but clearly much more needs to be unraveled in this regard. We here provide an overview of the molecular pathogenetic knowledge gained so far on low- and high-grade ESS.

Is Adnexectomy Mandatory at the Time of Hysterectomy for Uterine Sarcomas? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Uterine sarcomas represents only 3% of all the female genital tract ones. The tumoral stage is the most significant prognostic factor. The role of the bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in the surgical management of FIGO stage IA and IB appears still controversial. This review aims to investigate the impact of bilateral adnexectomy in the treatment of uterine sarcoma. Methods: Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Medline, and Medscape databases in February 2022. We applied no language or geographical restrictions, but we considered only English studies. We included the studies containing data about Recurrence Rate (RR), Disease-free Survival (DFS), and Overall Survival (OS). We used comparative studies for meta-analysis. Results: Seventeen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 2 retrospective observational studies, and 15 retrospective comparative studies, And 14 out of the 15 comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. A total of 3743 patients were analyzed concerning the use of adnexectomy with hysterectomy in patients with uterine sarcoma and compared with those who did not. Meta-analysis highlighted a non-significant worsening of the OS in the BSO group compared to the OP group and showed that adnexectomy does not improve the DFS (BSO OR 1.23 (95% CI 0.81-1.85) p = 0.34; I2 = 24% p = 0.22). Conclusions: Most studies selected for our review showed that adnexectomy does not significantly affect the RR, OS, and PFS in treating FIGO stage I uterine sarcomas. Therefore, even if there is a unanimous consensus about bilateral adnexectomy in menopausal patients, preservation of ovarian tissue may be considered in premenopausal women. Nonetheless, there are not enough cases in the literature to recommend this procedure.

MRI features and clinical outcomes of unexpected uterine sarcomas in patients who underwent high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for presumed uterine fibroids.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the MRI features and clinical outcomes of unexpected uterine sarcomas in patients after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation for presumed uterine fibroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15,759 consecutive patients who came for HIFU treatment, from November 2008 to September 2019, for presumed uterine fibroids were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients had completed a pre-HIFU MRI. All MRI images were independently analyzed and interpreted by two radiologists in every center. RESULTS: According to the T2WI MRI features of hyperintensity, accompanied by irregular margins, necrosis or cystic degeneration, multi-lobulated lesion with internal septation, 46 patients were suspected to be uterine sarcomas before HIFU. Eleven patients were histologically diagnosed as uterine sarcomas after laparotomy. Among the 15713 patients who received HIFU treatment for presumed uterine fibroids, 8 patients were found to have occult recurrence during the follow-up period, and 6 were confirmed histologically as uterine sarcomas after laparotomy. The incidence rate of uterine sarcomas was 0.108% (17/15759). Among them, 12 cases were low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) and 5 cases were uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS). No histological dissemination of the sarcoma was detected in patients with unexpected uterine sarcomas. CONCLUSION: Although some MRI features of uterine sarcomas and uterine fibroids overlapped, MRI is valuable in distinguishing between uterine fibroids and uterine sarcomas. HIFU does not seem to cause histological dissemination of the sarcoma, but follow-up visits should be strictly adhered to in order to detect unexpected uterine sarcomas at an early stage and to treat them in a timely manner.

Metastatic endometrial stromal sarcoma: A rare cause of right-sided intracardiac mass.

The endometrial stromal sarcoma (EES) is a rare uterine malignancy and its intracardiac metastasis are exceedingly rare. We report a case of a 53-year-old female patient diagnosed with a metastatic tumor of a ESS in the right side of the heart, who underwent successful surgical resection and initiated chemotherapy with docetaxel and gemcitabine. At a 9-month follow-up, the patient was in New York Heart Association-Class I, without any further complications.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma versus undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a Turkish uterine sarcoma group study-001.

OBJECTIVE: Prognostic factors associated with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS) and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS) have not been distinctly determined due to the repetitive changes in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and outcomes of patients with HGESS with those of patients with UUS. METHODS: A multi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study was conducted including 71 patients, who underwent surgery at 13 centers from 2008 to 2017. An experienced gynecopathologist from each institution re-evaluated the slides of their own cases according to the WHO2014 classification. Factors associated with refractory/progressive disease, recurrence or death were examined using logistic regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival comparisons. RESULTS: The median disease-free survival (DFS) for HGESS and UUS was 12 months and 6 months, respectively. While the median overall survival was not reached in HGESS group, it was 22 months in the UUS group. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that patients with UUS had a significantly poorer DFS than those with HGESS (p = 0.016), although OS did not differ between the groups (p = 0.135). Lymphovascular-space involvement (LVSI) was the sole significant factor associated with progression, recurrence or death for HGESS (Hazard ratio: 9.353, 95% confidence interval: 2.539-34.457, p = 0.001), whereas no significant independent factor was found for UUS. CONCLUSIONS: UUS has a more aggressive behavior than HGESS. While no significant predictor of prognosis was found for UUS, LVSI is the sole independent prognostic factor for HGESS, with patients 9.3 times more likely to experience refractory/progressive disease, recurrence or death.