RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hinge fractures in varus-producing distal femoral osteotomies (DFOs) lead to decreased axial and torsional stability. The purpose of this study was to assess (1) which hinge width has a high risk of hinge fracture in DFO for lateral opening wedge (LOW) and medial closing wedge (MCW) osteotomies, (2) which osteotomies allow for greater correction before risking a fracture, (3) whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) allows accurate hinge width planning. METHODS: Thirty porcine femoral bones were divided into two groups: LOW, MCW with hinge widths of 5 mm, 7.5 mm, and 10 mm as subgroups. Osteotomies were performed in a PSI-navigated fashion. A force parallel to the longitudinal bone axis was applied in a uniaxial testing machine until a fracture occurred. RESULTS: The maximum correction was 6.7 ± 1.1° for LOW and 13.4 ± 1.9° for MCW (ß0 < 0.001, ß1 = 0.002, ß2 = 0.02, ß3 = 0.005). The relative error of the planned hinge width compared with the actual hinge width was -3.7 ± 12.3% for LOW (P = 0.25) and 12.3 ± 13.1% for MCW (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the hinge width allows for greater correction in MCW osteotomies. For LOW osteotomies, a smaller hinge width seems to be advantageous because it allows a greater correction without the risk of hinge fracture. With PSI-guided LOW osteotomies, the planned hinge width could be achieved intraoperatively with greater accuracy than with MCW osteotomies. However, the MCW osteotomy appears to be the preferred option when larger corrections are desired because a larger correction angle can be achieved without the risk of intraoperative hinge fracture.
RESUMO
Late-discovered developmental hip dysplasia deformities often necessitate complex surgical treatments and meticulous preoperative planning. The selection of osteotomies is contingent upon the patient's age and the specific structural deformity of the hip. In our anatomical hip model, derived from the data of a 12-year-old patient, we performed virtual osteotomies that are commonly recommended for such cases. We precisely constructed geometric models for various osteotomies, including the Dega, Pemberton, Tönnis, Ganz, Chiari pelvic, and Pauwels femoral osteotomies. We employed Autodesk Inventor for the finite element analysis of the hip joint and the corrective osteotomies. In comparing one-stage osteotomies, we noted that the Dega and Ganz pelvic osteotomies, especially when combined with the Pauwels femoral osteotomy, yielded the most favorable outcomes. These combinations led to enhanced femoral head coverage and reduced intra-articular pressure. Furthermore, we calculated the femoral head-to-acetabulum volume ratio for both the Dega and Pauwels osteotomies. The encouraging results we obtained advocate for the integration of finite element analysis in virtual osteotomies of the pelvis and femur as a preoperative tool in the management of developmental hip dysplasia.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Intraoperative hinge fractures in distal femur osteotomies represent a risk factor for loss of alignment and non-union. Using finite element analysis, the goal of this study was to investigate the influence of different hinge widths and osteotomy corrections on hinge fractures in medial closed-wedge and lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomies. METHODS: The hinge was located at the proximal margin of adductor tubercle for biplanar lateral open-wedge and at the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle for biplanar medial closed-wedge distal femur osteotomies, corresponding to optimal hinge positions described in literature. Different hinge widths (5, 7.5, 10 mm) were created and the osteotomy correction was opened/closed by 5, 7.5 and 10 mm. Tensile and compressive strain of the hinge was determined in a finite element analysis and compared to the ultimate strain of cortical bone to assess the hinge fracture risk. RESULTS: Doubling the correction from 5 to 10 mm increased mean tensile and compressive strain by 50% for lateral open-wedge and 48% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. A hinge width of 10 mm versus 5 mm showed increased strain in the hinge region of 61% for lateral open-wedge and 32% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. Medial closed-wedge recorded a higher fracture risk compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies due to a larger hinge cross-section area (60-67%) for all tested configurations. In case of a 5 mm hinge, medial closed-wedge recorded 71% higher strain in the hinge region compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies. CONCLUSION: Due to morphological features of the medial femoral condyle, finite element analysis suggests that lateral-open wedge osteotomies are the preferable option if larger corrections are intended, as a thicker hinge can remain without an increased hinge fracture risk.