Clinicians' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to sperm banking in adolescent males with cancer: a mixed-methods study.

PURPOSE: To examine processes, barriers, and facilitators to sperm banking counseling and decision-making for adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer from the perspective of clinicians who completed Oncofertility communication training. We also identify opportunities for improvement to inform future interventions and implementation. METHODS: A survey (N=104) and subsequent focus groups (N=15) were conducted with non-physician clinicians practicing in pediatric oncology who completed Oncofertility communication training. RESULTS: Most survey participants were confident in communicating about the impact of cancer on fertility (n=87, 83.7%) and fertility preservation options (n=80, 76.9%). Most participants reported never/rarely using a sperm banking decision tool (n=70, 67.3%), although 98.1% (n=102) said a decision tool with a family-centered approach would be beneficial. Primary themes in the subsequent focus groups included variable processes/workflows (inconsistent approaches to consult initiation; involvement of adolescents, caregivers, and various clinician types; assessment of puberty/sexual experience), structural and psychosocial barriers (cost and logistics, developmental, cultural, clinical acuity/prognosis), and facilitators (educational materials, alternative options for banking). Opportunities and strategies for improvement (including fertility preservation in existing research protocols; additional staffing/resources; oncologist education and buy-in; and development of decision tools) were informed by challenges identified in the other themes. CONCLUSION: Barriers to adolescent sperm banking remain, even among clinicians who have completed Oncofertility training. Although training is one factor necessary to facilitate banking, structural and psychosocial barriers persist. Given the complexities of offering sperm banking to pediatric populations, continued efforts are needed to mitigate structural barriers and develop strategies to facilitate decision-making before childhood cancer treatment.

Disparities in fertility preservation among patients diagnosed with female breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of specific patient factors with disparities in fertility preservation counseling and utilization of fertility preservation among patients ≤ 40 years old diagnosed with female breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted investigating patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2012 and December 2020 in a multi-site health system. Rates of fertility counseling and utilization of preservation services were compared based on age, race/ethnicity, parity, insurance type, and treatment site. RESULTS: Of the 6,783 patients diagnosed with female breast cancer, 306 (4.5%) were ≤ 40 years old at the time of diagnosis. There was no significant difference between Black or African American and White patients in rates of fertility counseling (12.1% vs 17.4%; p = 0.285) or pursuit of fertility preservation (3.3% vs 4.2%; p = 0.508), nor was a difference observed when compared by insurance type. However, younger patients (< 30 years of age), patients with 1 or no children, and patients treated in the more affluent county were more likely to undergo counseling and pursue fertility preservation than their matched counterparts. CONCLUSION: Age, parity, and location of breast cancer care may impact rates of fertility counseling and preservation among reproductive age women diagnosed with breast cancer. Thus, further attention to age discrimination, a patient's desire for future fertility, need for standardization in fertility preservation counseling, and perhaps implementation of comprehensive fertility coverage mandates across all states could help to improve gaps in fertility counseling and fertility preservation.

Perspectives of Young Women With Gynecologic Cancers on Fertility and Fertility Preservation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Gynecologic cancers standard treatment often requires the removal of some reproductive organs, making fertility preservation a complex challenge. Despite heightened oncofertility awareness, knowledge about fertility attitudes and decisions of young patients with gynecologic cancer is scarce. The aim of this systematic review was to highlight what is currently known about knowledge, attitudes, and decisions about fertility, fertility preservation, and parenthood among these patients. METHODS: Peer-reviewed journals published in English were searched in PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE from January 1, 2000 to July 1, 2020. Childbearing, fertility, fertility preservation, pregnancy, and parenthood attitudes/decisions after gynecologic cancer from women's perspective were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies comprised the review. Most of the women valued fertility preservation procedures that could be regarded as a means to restore fertility. A unique feature identified was that fertility preservation was seen also as a way to restore gender identity perceived to be lost or threatened during diagnosis and treatment. Fertility counseling was suboptimal, with wide variability among studies reviewed. Comparisons between gynecologic cancers and other cancer types about fertility counseling rates were inconclusive. The potential negative impact of impaired fertility on patients' mental health and quality of life was also documented. CONCLUSIONS: Fertility and parenthood were important matters in patients' lives, with the majority of patients expressing positive attitudes toward future childbearing. Results confirm that the inclusion of patients with gynecologic cancer in research studies focusing on this topic still remains low. Additionally, the provision of fertility counseling and referral by health professionals is still suboptimal.

How can fertility counseling be implemented for every newly diagnosed pediatric patient facing gonadotoxic treatment?-A single-center experience.

Since the survival rates of pediatric patients undergoing cancer treatment or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have increased rapidly in recent decades, the late effects of treatment are now an important focus of patient care. Access to fertility preservation (FP) procedures as well as their financing differs considerably across Europe. However, some countries in Europe have recently changed the legal basis for financing FP procedures; therefore, the implementation of structures is mandatory to give patients access to FP. In this prospective cohort study, we characterized the process for establishing pediatric fertility counseling, including the development of an in-house standard procedure for recommendations regarding FP with potentially gonadotoxic treatment and valuating data from all FP counseling sessions. All data concerning patient characteristics (pubertal status, disease group) and recommendation of FP measures were prospectively collected and adoption of FP measures analyzed. Prior to the establishment of a structured process for FP in our pediatric oncology and stem cell transplantation center, there was no standardized FP counseling. We demonstrate that with the establishment of an inhouse standard procedure, it is possible to give consistent yet individualized FP counseling to approximately 90% of our patients facing gonadotoxic treatment, counseling over 200 patients between 2017 and 2019. This pilot study could potentially be adapted in other pediatric hematology, oncology, and stem cell transplantation centers to allow a more standardized handling of FP counseling for all patients facing gonadotoxic treatment.

Fertility after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A call to action.

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is increasingly accepted as the best therapeutic option in primary and some secondary peritoneal malignancies. The ramifications of this procedure on fertility are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the current association of CRS/HIPEC with fertility following surgery. METHODS: A review of patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2018 was performed. Female patients were included if they were between ages 18-50 at the time of surgery. Gynecologic and obstetric history before and following CRS/HIPEC was collected by phone interview. RESULTS: Of 48 eligible participants, 21 completed the survey. Sixty-five percent of women underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy before or during CRS. Twenty-nine percent of these women recall fertility counseling before CRS/HIPEC, while 14.3% saw a fertility specialist for consultation, and only one patient proceeded with oocyte cryopreservation before treatment. There were no pregnancies reported following treatment with CRS/HIPEC. CONCLUSION: Few patients after CRS/HIPEC retain child-bearing potential, partly due to the high rate of hysterectomy and oophorectomy at time of surgery. Efforts towards improved preoperative counseling, increased oocyte cryopreservation, and evaluating the safety of preserving reproductive organs at the time of surgery are needed.

A qualitative study examining transgender people's attitudes towards having a child to whom they are genetically related and pursuing fertility treatments in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Advances in biomedical technologies permit transgender individuals not only to achieve gender transition but also to experience parenthood. Little is known about this topic in Greece, which, although a traditionally conservative country, is changing at the legal level towards a greater recognition of transgender people's rights. This study aimed to investigate transgender people's attitudes towards having a child to whom they are genetically related and pursuing fertility treatments in Greece. METHODS: This is a prospective qualitative study conducted with adult individuals who identified as transgender men or transgender women between April 2019 and March 2020. Individual in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 participants. The interviews were carried out in person and were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. We performed a thematic analysis of the data. RESULTS: The thematic data analysis resulted in the identification of themes that represent key barriers to pursuing fertility preservation or the use of assisted reproductive technology. Six major themes were clearly present in the findings (lack of adequate information and counseling, worsening gender dysphoria, increased discrimination against transgender people due to the rise of extreme far-right populism, low parental self-efficacy, high costs, and a less-than-perfect legal framework). Moreover, diverse cases were examined, and minor themes, such as the symbolic value of the uterus and pregnancy, the relationship between the type of gender transition and willingness to pursue fertility treatments, and transgender people's adherence to heteronormative patterns in the context of reproduction, were identified. Various reasons for transgender people's differing degrees of desire for parenthood were identified. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated contextual factors as well as factors related to transgender people themselves as barriers to pursuing transgender parenthood. Most aspects of our findings are consistent with those of previous research. However, some aspects of our findings (regarding aggressive behaviors and economic instability) are specific to the context of Greece, which is characterized by the rise of extreme far-right populism due to the decade-long Greek economic crisis and a deeply conservative traditionalist background. In that regard, the participants highlighted the (perceived as) less-than-perfect Greek legislation on transgender people's rights as a barrier to transgender (biological) parenthood.

Fertility Counseling and Preservation for Breast Cancer Patients.

Fertility preservation includes all the necessary steps that have to be taken in order to implement a woman's aim for preserving and enhancing her future chances of having her own biological offspring.There are two available choices for patients to maintain their fertility.The first category includes all the preventive methods following the principle of reduction of gonadotoxicity, in terms of using fewer toxic drugs to the ovaries and similarly milder radiation regimens. It also includes the administration of agents that would keep the ovaries suppressed, to minimize the harmful effects of systemic therapy on the oocytes.The second includes necessary artificial reproductive technology procedures for collecting and freezing either gametes (oocytes) or zygotes (embryos). This can be accomplished with immature oocyte pickup followed by in vitro maturation (IVM). Alternatively, mature oocytes can be collected after minimal ovarian stimulation with very small doses or no medication at all, or through a natural cycle.Beyond that, promising is the modern option of ovarian tissue cryopreservation for future transplantation, while the option of oocyte donation is actually an option for childbearing, not for fertility.

Fertility-related experiences after breast cancer diagnosis in the Sister and Two Sister Studies.

BACKGROUND: Commonly used chemotherapies can be toxic to the ovaries. To the authors' knowledge, the majority of studies evaluating receipt of fertility counseling for women in their reproductive years have been performed in specific settings, thereby limiting generalizability. METHODS: A nationwide sample of US women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 45 years completed a survey assessing the prevalence of fertility counseling. Age-adjusted log-binomial regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% CIs for fertility counseling. RESULTS: Among 432 survivors diagnosed between 2004 and 2011, 288 (67%) had not discussed the effects of treatment on fertility with a health care provider before or during treatment. Fertility discussion was associated with younger age (PR, 3.49 [95% CI, 2.66-4.58] for aged <35 years vs ≥40 years) and lower parity (PR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.29-2.53] for parity 1 vs 2). Approximately 20% of respondents reported that they were interested in future fertility (87 of 432 respondents) at the time of their diagnosis, but not all of these individuals (66 of 87 respondents) received counseling regarding the impact of treatment on their fertility, and few (8 of 87 respondents) used fertility preservation strategies. Among 68 women with a fertility interest who provided reasons for not taking steps to preserve fertility, reasons cited included concern for an adverse impact on cancer treatment (56%), lack of knowledge (26%), decision to not have a child (24%), and cost (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Across multiple treatment settings, the majority of women of reproductive age who are diagnosed with breast cancer did not discuss fertility with a health care provider or use fertility preservation strategies. Discussing the potential impact of cancer treatment on future fertility is an important aspect of patient education.

Fertility counseling before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Fertility counseling before cancer treatment has been advocated by clinical guidelines, though little is known about its long-term impact on the unique reproductive concerns of female adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. The goal of this study was to measure the association between fertility counseling by fertility specialists before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns. METHOD: A cross-sectional analysis was performed among 747 AYA survivors aged 18-40 years who had been recruited from cancer registries and physician and advocacy group referrals between 2015 and 2017. Participants self-reported information on past fertility counseling at cancer diagnosis, cancer type and treatment, and current reproductive concerns, as measured using the multidimensional Reproductive Concerns After Cancer scale. Multivariable log-binomial regression models tested associations between fertility counseling and reproductive concerns. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 33.0 years (standard deviation, 5.1 years), and the mean period since diagnosis was 7.7 years (standard deviation, 5.0 years). Seventy-three percent of participants were white, and 24% were Hispanic. Fertility counseling was reported by 19% of survivors; moderate to high overall reproductive concerns were reported by 44% of participants. In adjusted analysis, fertility counseling was significantly associated with moderate to high reproductive concerns (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.45) and not modified by exposure to fertility-threatening treatments (Pinteraction = .23). CONCLUSION: A large proportion of AYA cancer survivors across cancer types and treatment exposures reported moderate to high reproductive concerns, suggesting that there is a need to address these cancer-specific reproductive health concerns after treatment. Higher concerns, even with counseling, suggests the need to improve the quality of fertility counseling throughout the cancer continuum.

The psychological importance of fertility preservation counseling and support for cancer patients.

Infertility associated with cancer can have significant psychological impacts for cancer patients and survivors, necessitating appropriate fertility-related psychological support. This literature review details the psychological impact of infertility in cancer patients and survivors, and discusses fertility counseling as described in current international guidelines; as either the provision of fertility information or psychosocial support. Fertility counseling has a role in assisting with fertility treatment decision-making, but also in supporting patients with the emotional distress associated with potential infertility at the time of cancer diagnosis, and infertility in survivorship. The necessity of psychological support for fertility patients is outlined, alongside recommendations for adolescent and young adult patients, and family members of cancer patients involved in fertility and oncological care. Moving forward, clear guidelines for fertility counseling of cancer patients in the context of fertility preservation may be beneficial, in removing ambiguity as to whom conducts counseling, what counseling involves, and what level of psychosocial support may be most effective in supporting cancer patients longitudinally.

Challenges of fertility preservation in non-oncological diseases.

Clinicians should provide fertility counseling to all patients receiving gonadotoxic treatment. International scientific societies have mainly focused on oncological patients, and fewer efforts have been made to apply these recommendations to women diagnosed with benign disease (eg benign hematological diseases, autoimmune diseases, and gynecological or genetic disorders). However, these indications account for 8%-13% of the demand for fertility preservation. The risk of premature ovarian failure due to treatment, or to the disease itself, can be considered fairly high for many young women. Counseling and adequate management of these women require particular attention due to the severe health conditions that are associated with some of these diseases. In this review, we address specific issues related to providing adequate fertility counseling and management for women who have been diagnosed with the major non-oncological indications, based on the literature and on our clinical experience.

Health care provider perceptions of fertility preservation barriers and challenges with transgender patients and families: qualitative responses to an international survey.

PURPOSE: To examine provider perceptions of practice behaviors and barriers related to fertility counseling, fertility preservation, and family building among transgender patients. METHODS: Participants were medical and mental health professionals who treat adult and youth transgender patients. Recruitment occurred online and in person, via professional listservs for transgender professionals, conferences, and gender clinics. From August-November 2017, 110 participants representing nine countries responded to four open-ended questions included on a survey related to provider practice behaviors and perceived barriers to fertility counseling, fertility preservation, and family building with transgender patients. Thematic coding analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS: Multiple themes were identified including the following: access and cost issues; urgency for gender-affirming treatment; patient maturity and inability to make future-oriented decisions; and provider-related challenges pertaining to knowledge, role, and general lack of information in the nascent field of transgender reproductive health. CONCLUSION(S): This study yielded insights into practice behaviors, challenges, and perceived barriers to fertility counseling with transgender individuals and can serve as a basis for intervention development to optimize clinical practices with this population.

What is the Role of the Oncology Nurse in Fertility Preservation Counseling and Education for Young Patients?

Oncology nurses are uniquely positioned to offer fertility preservation counseling and education for cancer patients of reproductive age, yet there is a dearth of research that focuses on current practice and perceptions of nursing role. In 2013, the American Society of Clinical Oncology extended the duties of fertility preservation counseling among patients of reproductive age undergoing cancer treatment to include registered nurses and other allied health professionals as active partners in the counseling and education process. This study used a cross-sectional descriptive survey to assess current practices, role perceptions, and barriers to fertility preservation counseling among registered nurses working in an academic care setting with outpatient and inpatient services. There were significant gaps in current practices and perceptions of roles regarding fertility preservation counseling. Many nurses expressed the perception that fertility preservation counseling was important, but it was outside the scope of their practice to perform this education. This preliminary work defined need for an interdisciplinary fertility preservation team, communication surrounding educational practice norms, and designated oncofertility navigator.

Fertility-Preserving Treatments and Patient- and Parental Satisfaction on Fertility Counseling in a Cohort of Newly Diagnosed Boys and Girls with Childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of fertility-preserving (FP) treatments and fertility counseling that was offered in a cohort of newly diagnosed children with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). METHODS: In this observational study, boys and girls with cHL aged ≤ 18 years with scheduled treatment according to the EuroNet-PHL-C2 protocol were recruited from 18 sites (5 countries), between January 2017 and September 2021. In 2023, a subset of Dutch participants (aged ≥ 12 years at time of diagnosis) and parents/guardians were surveyed regarding fertility counseling. RESULTS: A total of 101 boys and 104 girls were included. Most post-pubertal boys opted for semen cryopreservation pre-treatment (85% of expected). Invasive FP treatments were occasionally chosen for patients at a relatively low risk of fertility based on scheduled alkylating agent exposure (4/5 testicular biopsy, 4/4 oocyte, and 11/11 ovarian tissue cryopreservation). A total of 17 post-menarchal girls (20%) received GnRH-analogue co-treatment. Furthermore, 33/84 parents and 26/63 patients responded to the questionnaire. Most reported receiving fertility counseling (97%/89%). Statements regarding the timing and content of counseling were generally positive. Parents and patients considered fertility counseling important (94%/87% (strongly agreed) and most expressed concerns about (their child's) fertility (at diagnosis 69%/46%, at present: 59%/42%). CONCLUSION: Systematic fertility counseling is crucial for all pediatric cHL patients and their families. FP treatment should be considered depending on the anticipated risk and patient factors. We encourage the development of a decision aid for FP in pediatric oncology.

Examining the Role of Nutrition in Cancer Survivorship and Female Fertility: A Narrative Review.

Female cancer survivors have a higher chance of experiencing infertility than females without a history of cancer diagnosis. This risk remains high despite advances in fertility treatments. There is a need to augment fertility treatments with cost-effective methods such as nutritional guidance to improve fertility chances. The aim of this review article is to connect the current literature on cancer survivorship nutrition and fertility nutrition, focusing on the importance of integrating nutritional guidance into fertility counseling, assessment, and treatment for female cancer survivors. Consuming a healthful diet comprising whole grains, soy, fruits, vegetables, seafood, and unsaturated fats has improved both female fertility and cancer survivorship. Similarly, maintaining a healthy body weight also improves female fertility and cancer survivorship. Therefore, dietary interventions to support female cancer survivors with fertility challenges are of immense importance. The period of follow-up fertility counseling and assessment after cancer treatment may provide a unique opportunity for implementing nutritional guidance for female cancer survivors. Dietary interventions are a promising strategy to improve pregnancy chances and overall quality of life among female cancer survivors; thus, researchers should investigate perceptions regarding fertility, barriers, and challenges to changing nutrition-related behaviors, and preferences for nutritional guidance to support fertility treatments in this population.

Reproductive Health Assessment and Reports of Fertility Counseling in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with Sickle Cell Disease After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) place patients at risk for reproductive health issues. The purpose of this study was to assess reproductive health and reports of fertility counseling in patients with SCD who received a transplant. This was a secondary analysis of gonadal hormone production, future infertility risk assessment, and parent-proxy/patient reports of fertility counseling in SCD transplant recipients who are currently pubertal and were enrolled in the Atlanta sites of the Sickle Cell Transplant Evaluation of Long-term and Late Effects Registry (STELLAR) between May 2017 and October 2023. Clinical information was abstracted from medical records and reproductive health survey data from the STELLAR database. Descriptive statistics were reported as median (interquartile range [IQR]) or percentages. There were 20 females and 12 males in the study population. Females were median (IQR) 19.6 (9.4) years old and males 20.8 (11.4) years old at the time of the study. Transplants most commonly occurred in the decade 2010 to 2019 at 10.7 (4.8) years old for females and 11.1 (4.1) years old for males. Most participants received bone marrow stem cells (95.0% females, 100.0% males) from matched sibling donors (90.0% females, 100.0% males). Participants received one of seven HCT conditioning regimens with cyclophosphamide equivalent doses ranging from 3388 to 9706 mg/m2. The majority of females (90.0%) had diminished ovarian reserve with low anti-Mullerian hormone levels, and 61.1% had premature ovarian insufficiency with two follicle-stimulating hormone levels (FSH) ≥40 mIU/mL post-HCT. All males had normal testosterone levels, but 63.6% had elevated FSH levels suggestive of impaired spermatogenesis post-HCT. Parent proxies (for patients <18 years old) and patients ≥18 years old completed surveys 9.0 years (5.2) and 7.9 years (9.3) since HCT in females and males respectively. Twenty-five percent of parent proxies and 45% of patients reported that they had not been informed by a healthcare provider of the risk of infertility post-transplant. There are high rates of gonadal dysfunction post-HCT, but many parent proxies and patients do not recall being told of the risk for future infertility. More effective methods of education are warranted to ensure SCD patients and their families clearly understand the risk for reproductive health issues post-HCT.

Evaluation of oncofertility care in childhood cancer patients: the EU-Horizon 2020 twinning project TREL initiative.

Background: The 5-year survival rate of childhood cancer exceeds 80%, however, many survivors develop late effects including infertility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of oncofertility care at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos (VULSK) within the framework of the EU-Horizon 2020 TREL project. Methods: All parents or patients aged 12-17.9 years treated from July 1, 2021 until July 1, 2022 were invited to complete an oncofertility-care-evaluation questionnaire. After completing the questionnaire, patients were triaged to low-risk (LR) or high-risk (HR) of gonadal damage using a risk stratification tool (triage). Data was assessed using descriptive statistics. Results: Questionnaires were completed by 48 parents and 13 children triaged as 36 (59%) LR and 25 (41%) HR patients. Most HR respondents (21/25, 84%) were not counseled by a fertility specialist. Six boys (4 HR, 2 LR) were counseled, none of the girls was counseled. Three HR boys underwent sperm cryopreservation. Only 17 (27.9%, 9 HR, 8 LR) respondents correctly estimated their risk. All counseled boys (n = 6) agreed the risk for fertility impairment had been mentioned as compared to 49.1% (n = 27) of uncounseled. All counseled respondents agreed they knew enough about fertility (vs. 42%). Conclusions: Respondents counseled by a fertility specialist were provided more information on fertility than uncounseled. HR patients were not sufficiently counseled by a fertility specialist. Based on the current experience oncofertility care at VULSK will be improved.

A multidisciplinary pediatric oncofertility team improves fertility preservation and counseling across 7 years.

BACKGROUND: Oncofertility is a developing field of increasing importance, particularly in pediatric oncology, where most patients are likely to survive long-term and have not yet had the opportunity to have children. AIMS: We performed a quality improvement initiative to increase our rates of fertility preservation counseling and referral through the implementation of a pediatric oncofertility team, and we report outcomes 7 years following implementation of our initiative. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compare our baseline oncofertility survey to 44 post-intervention survey respondents and electronic medical record documentation for 149 patients treated in 2019. Ninety-five percent of post-intervention survey respondents recalled fertility counseling (baseline 70%, p = .004) and 89.3% were appropriately referred for fertility preservation (baseline 50%, p = .017). Counseling was documented in 60.4% of charts; 81% of patients analyzed by chart review were appropriately referred for fertility preservation. Fertility preservation outcomes differed by sex assigned at birth. CONCLUSION: Creation of an oncofertility team produced improvements in fertility counseling and fertility preservation referral across an extended period of time.

Look at the future -perceptions of fertility counseling and decision-making among adolescents and their parents in the context of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-experience of one major center for pediatric stem cell transplantation.

Introduction: Increasing survival rates after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in childhood should put focus on improving the quality of life as adults. An essential aspect is fertility and its preservation. In order to take advantage of the possibility of fertility preservation, fertility counseling should be provided to patients and their parents prior to gonadotoxic therapies. Methods: The aim of this survey was to analyze the impact of fertility counseling in pediatric stem cell transplantation in patients and their parents using questionnaires designed for the study questions. Fifty-one parents and 7 adolescent patients were interviewed between February 2019 and October 2021 about the counseling, their perceptions of fertility issues, and the nature of decision- making concerning fertility preservation. The study included patients with malignant (e.g., leukemia, lymphoma, neuroblastoma) and nonmalignant diseases (e.g., thalassemia, sickle cell disease, immunodeficiency) who received counseling on fertility preservation before HSCT based on an in-house standard and analysed the impact for both groups. Results: Two-thirds of the study participants were concerned about having children and grandchildren respectively; for half of all respondents, the topic of fertility and fertility preservation proved to be hopeful. Forty percent of the study participants were burdened by the risk of possible fertility limitations after HSCT. Concerns about fertility was particularly significant for parents whose children were advised to undergo fertility preservation. Parents of children <12 years found deciding on appropriate measures more difficult. Parents with children >7 years involved their children in the decision. All study participants agreed that fertility counseling had not negatively affected the parent-child relationship. More than 90% of all study participants were in favor of addressing fertility, its potential limitations and fertility preservation measures before HSCT. There was no significant difference between the malignant and the non-malignant cohort in all study questions. Discussion: Overall, the standardized fertility counseling provided in our center of pediatric stem cell transplantation resulted in high satisfaction among patients and their parents. Multiple counseling on infertility risk, including the younger patients in the decision-making and further options after gonadotoxic therapy may increase the satisfaction of the counseled patients and their parents.