Multidisciplinary management of anti-PP1Pk or anti-P alloimmunization during pregnancy: A new case with anti-P and a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell alloimmunization is the first cause of fetal and neonatal anemia. Alloimmunizations with anti-PP1Pk or anti-P can cause recurrent miscarriages and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy. We report on a pregnant patient immunized with anti-P and a history of recurrent miscarriages. CASE REPORT: This P2k (GLOB:-1; P1PK:-1,3) patient had a first pregnancy marked by a caesarean at 38 weeks of gestation (WG) for non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Then, she had three early spontaneous miscarriages. The fifth pregnancy began with a high titer of anti-P at 128. Early initiation of treatment with Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIg) and plasma exchanges (PE) starting at 5 WG permitted us to reduce the titer of anti-P below 32. A healthy infant was delivered by caesarean at 38 WG without anemia at birth and no exchange transfusion was required. DISCUSSION AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: The P and Pk antigens are expressed on placental, trophoblastic, and embryonic cells. This explains why P1k (GLOB:-1; P1PK:1,3), P2k (GLOB:-1; P1PK:-1,3), or Tj(a-)/p (GLOB:-1; P1PK:-1,-3) patients are prone to recurrent abortions in the first trimester of pregnancy. A literature review demonstrated 87% (68/78) of miscarriages in p patients. However, publication biases are possible with the most severe cases being reported. CONCLUSION: Immunizations to P and PP1Pk antigens differ from others in their physiopathology and precocity. The association of PE and IVIg seems to be an effective treatment in the management of anti-PP1Pk or anti-P fetomaternal incompatibilities.

In utero treatment of severe fetal anemia resulting from fetomaternal red blood cell incompatibility: a comparison of simple transfusion and exchange transfusion.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in utero exchange transfusions (IUET) and in utero simple transfusions (IUST) for the treatment of fetal anemia resulting from red blood cell fetomaternal incompatibility. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study from January 2006 through December 2011. The two techniques were compared for effectiveness, complications, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: 36 patients had 87 IUETs and 85 patients 241 IUSTs. Gestational age at the first transfusion was similar in both groups (IUET: 27±3.8 weeks; IUST: 27±4.7 weeks; NS) as was the initial fetal hemoglobin level (IUET: 6.4±2.8g/dL; IUST: 6.0±2.5g/dL; NS). No significant differences were noted for postprocedure complications or efficacy. The daily drop in hemoglobin level was similar in both groups (IUET: 0.41±0.23g/dL/day; IUST: 0.44±0.17g/dL/day; NS) as were the time intervals between two procedures. Gestational age at birth was earlier in the IUET group (34.4±1.3 weeks vs 35.5±1.8 weeks; p<0.001), but the postnatal transfusions or exchange transfusions rates and the duration of intensive phototherapy did not differ. No significant differences were noted for the overall survival rates (IUET: 100%; IUST: 96.4%; p>0.99). CONCLUSION: IUET does not appear to provide any benefits compared with IUST, neither to be associated with a higher complication rate. The choice of the technique depends on availability of packed blood cells with high hematocrit (70-80%).