Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Perioperative Complications in Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Fluid overload and hypovolemia promote postoperative complications in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. In the present study, postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage were investigated before and after implementation of pulse pressure variation-guided fluid management (PPVGFM) during ovarian cancer surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of n = 243 patients with ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery at the University Hospital Bonn were retrospectively evaluated. Cohort A (CA; n = 185 patients) was treated before and cohort B (CB; n = 58 patients) after implementation of PPVGFM. Both cohorts were compared regarding postoperative complications. RESULTS: Ultrasevere complications (G4/G5) were exclusively present in CA (p = 0.0025). No difference between cohorts was observed regarding severe complications (G3-G5) (p = 0.062). Median positive fluid excess was lower in CB (p = 0.001). This was independent of tumor load [peritoneal cancer index] (p = 0.001) and FIGO stage (p = 0.001). Time to first postoperative defecation was shorter in CB (CB: d2 median versus CA: d3 median; p = 0.001). CB had a shorter length of hospital stay (p = 0.003), less requirement of intensive medical care (p = 0.001) and postoperative ventilation (p = 0.001). CB received higher doses of noradrenalin (p = 0.001). In the combined study cohort, there were more severe complications (G3-G5) in the case of a PFE ≥ 3000 ml (p = 0.034) and significantly more anastomotic leakage in the case of a PFE ≥ 4000 ml (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluid reduction in ovarian cancer surgery according to a PPVGFM is safe and significantly reduces ultrasevere postoperative complications. PFEs of ≥ 3000 ml and ≥ 4000 ml were identified as cutoffs for significantly more severe complications and anastomotic leakage, respectively.

Hyponatraemia-treatment standard 2024.

Hyponatraemia is the most common electrolyte disorder in hospital patients associated with increased morbidity, mortality, hospital stay and financial burden. The speed of a correction with 3% sodium chloride as a 100- to 150-ml intravenous bolus or continuous infusion depends on the severity and persistence of the symptoms and needs frequent biochemical monitoring. The rapid intermittent administration of hypertonic saline is preferred for treatment of symptomatic hyponatraemia. In asymptomatic mild hyponatraemia, an adequate solute intake with an initial fluid restriction (FR) of 500 ml/day adjusted according to the serum sodium (sNa) levels is preferred. Almost half of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) patients do not respond to FR as first-line therapy. At present, urea and tolvaptan are considered the most effective second-line therapies in SIADH. However, the evidence for guidance on the choice of second-line therapy of hypotonic hyponatraemia is lacking. Oral urea is considered to be a very effective and safe treatment. Mild and asymptomatic hyponatraemia is treated with adequate solute intake (salt and protein) and initial FR with adjustments based on sNa levels. Specific treatment with vaptans may be considered in either euvolaemic or hypervolaemic patients with high ADH activity. In order to ensure optimal patient outcome, close monitoring and readiness for administration of either hypotonic fluids or desmopressin may be crucial in the decision-making process for specific treatment and eventual overcorrection consequences. According to the guidelines, gradual correction and clinical evaluation is preferable over rapid normalization of sNa towards the laboratory reference ranges.

Association between health-related hope and distress from restrictions in chronic kidney disease and dialysis.

BACKGROUND: In chronic kidney disease (CKD), the durability of patient adherence to fluid and dietary restrictions may depend on the degree to which they have hope that they will enjoy life. Previous cross-sectional studies have shown that higher hope was associated with lower distress from fluid and dietary restrictions and better adherence in the short term. In this study, we aimed to examine the long-term relationship of hope with distress from fluid and dietary restrictions. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 444 patients with CKD undergoing dialysis in one of five Japanese nephrology centers. Hope as a predictor was measured using an 18-item health-related hope scale. Outcomes were two-item measures of distress from fluid and dietary intake restrictions using the Japanese version of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form, Version 1.3 (higher scores indicate lower levels of distress). Multivariate linear mixed models were used to estimate the association of baseline health-related hope with distress from fluid and dietary restrictions at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 67 years, and 31.1% of them were females. In total, 124, 98, and 222 had non-dialysis CKD, peritoneal dialysis, and hemodialysis, respectively. Higher levels of baseline health-related hope were associated with lower levels of distress from fluid restriction after one year (per 10-point increase, 2.6 points (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 4.1)); whereas the baseline score was not associated with the distress from fluid restriction at 2 years. Similarly, higher levels of baseline health-related hope were associated with lower levels of distress from dietary restriction after one year (per 10-point increase, 2.0 points (95% confidence interval, 0.3 to 3.6)); whereas the baseline score was not associated with the distress from dietary restriction at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related hope, regardless of depression, can potentially mitigate long-term distress from fluid and dietary restrictions in patients with a wide range of CKD severities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000054710.

Reply to the comment on "Fluid restriction in management of patent ductus arteriosus in Italy: a nationwide survey".

The Authors Chang Liu B.S and Yuan Shi commented our paper on Fluid restriction in management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in Italy. With our study, we conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey among all Italian Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) to address conservative management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants below 29 weeks' gestational age (GA), with specific regard to fluid restriction (FR). The Authors wondered if the heterogeneity of use of fluid restriction both as a prophylactic tool and as a conservative tool when a hemodynamically significant PDA is diagnosed, was due to economic disparities among areas of the included centers. Conducting a secondary analysis of our data, we observed that if we separately consider the responses of two areas, northern and central-southern Italy, FR is slightly more frequently applied in Central and Southern regions (82%) as compared to Northern regions (78%), although this finding does not reach statistical significance. No correlation between the likelihood to adopt conservative measures and the amount of allowed fluid intake was found. The hypothesis that "less fluid intake resulted in milder clinical and echocardiographic presentations of PDA, and thus a lower rate of pharmacological treatment" cannot be supported by our current study design and might deserve future investigations.

Fluid restriction in management of patent ductus arteriosus in Italy: a nationwide survey.

We aimed at establishing the state of the art in fluid restriction practice in our national setting and providing a foundation for future research efforts. A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted among all 114 Italian Neonatal Units in order to address conservative management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants below 29 weeks' gestational age (GA), with specific regard to fluid restriction. Response rate was 80%. Conservative measures for PDA management are provided in the majority of NICUs and 80% of centers reduce fluid intake in neonates with PDA. No relationship can be found among pharmacologically or surgically treated patients per year and the approach to fluid restriction. The minimum intake administered at regimen when fluid restriction is applied is associated to the ratio between the maximum number of neonates managed pharmacologically and number of admitted < 29 weeks' GA newborns. CONCLUSION: Our survey shows an extreme variability among centers in terms of use of fluid restriction as a prophylactic tool but also in terms of its use (both opportunity and modality) when a hemodynamically significant PDA is diagnosed. This variability, that can be also found in randomized trials and observational studies, suggests that further evidence is needed to better understand its potential beneficial effects and its potential harms such as dehydration, hypotension, decreased end-organ perfusion, and reduced caloric intake. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The lack of demonstrable improvement following the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus has recently paved the way to a more conservative approach. • Fluid restriction is the most commonly applied conservative treatment of PDA. WHAT IS NEW: • Among Italian NICUs an extreme variability in terms of indications, timing and modalities of application of Fluid restriction can be found. • This variability reflects the lack of standardization of this practice and the contrasting evidence on its efficacy.

Pilot Intervention for Mindful Drinking and Eating for Patients on Hemodialysis with Fluid Restrictions: Lessons Learned.

Patients requiring hemodialysis would benefit from evidence-based strategies that improve adherence to fluid restrictions while concurrently improving quality of life (QOL). This pilot study examined the effect of a four-week mindful drinking and eating intervention on interdialytic weight gain and QOL in patients on hemodialysis. Using paired t tests, no significant differences from pre- to post-test were found in interdialytic weight gain, a measure of fluid restriction adherence, or QOL in either the intervention (n = 18) or wait list control (n = 19) group. However, there was positive qualitative feedback from participants in exit interviews, and there were other indications of feasibility (low drop out, engagement in at-home practice according to weekly checklists). Lessons learned from this pilot study about conducting research regarding fluid restrictions for patients on hemodialysis are presented.

Fluid REStriction in Heart Failure vs Liberal Fluid UPtake: Rationale and Design of the Randomized FRESH-UP Study.

AIMS: It is common practice for clinicians to advise fluid restriction in patients with heart failure (HF), but data from clinical trials are lacking. Moreover, fluid restriction is associated with thirst distress and may adversely impact quality of life (QoL). To address this gap in evidence, the Fluid REStriction in Heart failure vs liberal fluid UPtake (FRESH-UP) study was initiated. METHODS: The FRESH-UP study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial to investigate the effects of a 3-month period of liberal fluid intake vs fluid restriction (1500 mL/day) on QoL in outpatients with chronic HF (New York Heart Association Classes II--III). The primary aim is to assess the effect on QoL after 3 months using the Overall Summary Score of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Thirst distress, as assessed by the Thirst Distress Scale for patients with HF, KCCQ Clinical Summary Score, each of the KCCQ domains and clinically meaningful changes in these scores, the EQ-5D-5L, patient-reported fluid intake and safety (ie, death, HF hospitalizations) are secondary outcomes. The FRESH-UP study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04551729). CONCLUSION: The results of the FRESH-UP study will add substantially to the level of evidence concerning fluid management in chronic HF and may impact the QoL of these patients.

Fluid Restriction After Transsphenoidal Surgery for the Prevention of Delayed Hyponatremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Delayed hyponatremia is the primary cause of readmission after transsphenoidal surgery, with a reported incidence of 9% to 30.7%. Studies have failed to identify consistent predictive factors for postoperative hyponatremia; thus, it is difficult to determine patients that are at a high risk. Fluid restriction is one approach for the prevention of hyponatremia. We have performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature to evaluate the impact of fluid restriction on hyponatremia and hospital readmissions. METHODS: Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched from inception to May 2021, using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study question format: Do patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery and followed a postoperative fluid restriction regimen differ in terms of hyponatremia and readmission rates? Studies that implemented fluid restriction and reported hyponatremia and/or readmission rates were included for analysis. Data were pooled by meta-analysis and analyzed using fixed effect and random effect models. RESULTS: A total of 143 manuscripts representing 103 unique studies were identified, with 5 studies included for analysis, yielding a pooled cohort of 1586 patients: 594 on fluid restriction protocols and 992 control patients. Fluid restriction protocols ranged from 1.0 to 2.5 L and varied in the length time between postoperative days 1 to 15. Patients on fluid restriction had a decreased risk of hyponatremia (risk ratio: 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57; P < .00001) and readmission due to hyponatremia (risk ratio: 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.63; P = .0038). CONCLUSION: Postoperative fluid restriction after transsphenoidal surgery represents an effective method for the prevention of hyponatremia and hospital readmission and has the potential to decrease health care costs.

Efficacy of Furosemide, Oral Sodium Chloride, and Fluid Restriction for Treatment of Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis (SIAD): An Open-label Randomized Controlled Study (The EFFUSE-FLUID Trial).

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: First-line therapy for syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) is fluid restriction. Additional treatment for patients who do not respond to fluid restriction are water restriction with furosemide or water restriction with furosemide and salt supplementation. However, the efficacy of these treatments has never been tested in a randomized controlled study. The objective of this study was to investigate whether, combined with fluid restriction, furosemide with or without sodium chloride (NaCl) supplementation was more effective than fluid restriction alone in the treatment of hyponatremia in SIAD. STUDY DESIGN: Open-label randomized controlled study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients with serum sodium concentrations ([Na+]) ≤ 130mmol/L due to SIAD. INTERVENTION(S): Random assignment to 1 of 3 groups: fluid restriction alone (FR), fluid restriction and furosemide (FR+FM), or fluid restriction, furosemide, and NaCl (FR+FM+NaCl). Strictness of fluid restriction (<1,000 or<500mL/d) was guided by the urine to serum electrolyte ratio. Furosemide dosage was 20 to 40mg/d. NaCl supplements were 3g/d. All treatments were continued for 28 days. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was change in [Na+] at days 4, 7, 14, and 28 after randomization. RESULTS: 92 patients were recruited (FR, n=31; FR+FM, n=30; FR+FM+NaCl, n=31). Baseline [Na+] was 125±4mmol/L, and there were no significant differences between groups. Mean [Na+] on day 4 in all treatment groups was significantly increased from baseline by 5mmol/L (P<0.001); however, the change in [Na+] was not significantly different across groups (P=0.7). There was no significant difference in percentage of patients or time to reach [Na+] ≥ 130 or≥135mmol/L across the 3 groups. Acute kidney injury and hypokalemia (potassium≤3.0mmol/L) were more common in patients receiving furosemide. LIMITATIONS: Open-label treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SIAD, furosemide with NaCl supplement in combination with fluid restriction did not show benefits in correction of [Na+] compared with treatment with fluid restriction alone. Incidences of acute kidney injury and hypokalemia were increased in patients receiving furosemide. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at the Thai Clinical Trial Registry with study number TCTR20170629004.

Association between health-related hope and adherence to prescribed treatment in CKD patients: multicenter cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In chronic kidney disease (CKD), patients' adherence to prescriptions for diet and for medications might depend on the degree to which they have hope that they will enjoy life, and that hope could vary with the stage of CKD. The aims of this study were to quantify both the association of CKD stage with health-related hope (HR-Hope), and the association of that hope with psychological and physiological manifestations of adherence. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving 461 adult CKD patients, some of whom were receiving dialysis. The main exposure was HR-Hope, measured using a recently-developed 18-item scale. The outcomes were perceived burden of fluid restriction and of diet restriction, measured using the KDQOL, and physiological manifestations of adherence (systolic and diastolic blood pressure [BP], and serum phosphorus and potassium levels). General linear models and generalized ordered logit models were fit. RESULTS: Participants at non-dialysis stage 4 and those at stage 5 had lower HR-Hope scores than did those at stage 2 or 3 (combined). Those at non-dialysis stage 5 had the lowest scores. HR-Hope scores of participants at stage 5D were similar to those of participants at stage 4, but they were lower than the scores of participants at stage 2 or 3 (combined). Higher HR-Hope scores were associated with lower perceived burdens of fluid restriction and of diet restriction (adjusted ORs per ten-point difference were 0.82 and 0.84, respectively). Higher HR-Hope scores were associated with lower systolic BP (adjusted mean difference in systolic BP per ten-point difference in HR-Hope scores was - 1.87 mmHg). In contrast, HR-Hope scores were not associated with diastolic BP, serum phosphorus levels, or serum potassium levels. CONCLUSIONS: Among CKD patients, HR-Hope is associated with disease stage, with psychological burden, and with some physiological manifestations of adherence.

The effect of low central venous pressure on hepatic surgical field bleeding and serum lactate in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the effect of fluid restriction alone versus fluid restriction + low central venous pressure (CVP) on hepatic surgical field bleeding, intraoperative blood loss, and the serum lactate concentration in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. METHODS: One hundred forty patients undergoing partial hepatectomy with intraoperative portal triad clamping were randomized into a fluid restriction group (Group F) or fluid restriction + low CVP group (Group L). Both groups received limited fluid infusion before the liver lesions were removed. Ephedrine was administered if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to <90 mmHg for 1 min. When the urine output was <20 ml/h or the SBP was <90 mmHg for 1 min more than three times, an additional 200 ml of crystalline solution was quickly infused within 10 min. In addition to fluid restriction, patients in Group L received continuous nitroglycerin and esmolol infusion to maintain a low CVP. The duration of portal triad clamping, frequency of additional fluid infusion, frequency of ephedrine administration, intraoperative blood loss, extent of liver resection, and bleeding score of the hepatic surgical field were recorded. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed before anesthesia (T1), after liver dissection and immediately before liver resection (T2), 10 min after removal of the liver lesion (T3), and before the patient was discharged from the postanesthesia care unit (T4). RESULTS: Being in the fluid restriction Group (Group F) (odds ratio = 5.04) and cirrhosis (odds ratio = 3.28) were risk factors for hepatic surgical field bleeding. Factors contributing to intraoperative blood loss were the operation time, duration of portal triad clamping, and extent of resection. No significant between-group difference was observed for blood loss or blood transfusion. The serum lactate concentration peaked at T3 in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining a lower CVP during hepatectomy provides an optimal surgical field but has no significant effect on intraoperative blood loss. Moreover, lower CVP does not increase the serum lactate concentration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: "A comparative study of the effect fluid restriction and low CVP pressure on the oozing of blood in liver wounds and blood lactate in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy" was prospectively registered as a trial (registration number: ChiCTR-INR-17014172, date of registration: 27 December 2017).

Urea treatment in fluid restriction-refractory hyponatraemia.

OBJECTIVE: Hyponatraemia in hospitalized patients is common and associated with increased mortality. International guidelines give conflicting advice regarding the role of urea in the treatment of SIADH. We hypothesized that urea is a safe, effective treatment for fluid restriction-refractory hyponatraemia. DESIGN: Review of urea for the treatment of hyponatraemia in patients admitted to a tertiary hospital during 2016-2017. Primary end-point: proportion of patients achieving a serum sodium ≥130 mmol/L at 72 hours. PATIENTS: Urea was used on 78 occasions in 69 patients. The median age was 67 (IQR 52-76), 41% were female. Seventy (89.7%) had hyponatraemia due to SIADH-CNS pathology (64.3%) was the most common cause. The duration was acute in 32 (41%), chronic in 35 (44.9%) and unknown in the rest. RESULTS: The median nadir serum sodium was 122 mmol/L (IQR 118-126). Fluid restriction was first-line treatment in 65.4%. Urea was used first line in 21.8% and second line in 78.2%. Fifty treatment episodes (64.1%) resulted in serum sodium ≥130 mmol/L at 72 hours. In 56 patients who received other prior treatment, the mean sodium change at 72 hours (6.9 ± 4.8 mmol/L) was greater than with the preceding treatments (-1.0 ± 4.7 mmol/L; P < 0.001). Seventeen patients (22.7%) had side effects (principally distaste), none were severe. No patients developed hypernatraemia, overcorrection (>10 mmol/L in 24 hours or >18 mmol/L in 48 hours), or died. CONCLUSIONS: Urea is safe and effective in fluid restriction-refractory hyponatraemia. We recommend urea with a starting dose of ≥30 g/d, in patients with SIADH and moderate to profound hyponatraemia who are unable to undergo, or have failed fluid restriction.

Fluid restriction negatively affects energy intake and growth in very low birthweight infants with haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus.

AIM: We explored if fluid restriction in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants with a haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) affected energy and protein intakes and growth. METHODS: Retrospectively, we identified 90 VLBW infants that were admitted to Umea University Hospital, Sweden, between 2009 and 2012: 42 with and 48 without haemodynamically significant PDA (hsPDA). Anthropometric, fluid, energy and protein intake data during the first 28 days of life were expressed as z-scores. RESULTS: In the 42 infants diagnosed with hsPDA, fluid intake was restricted after diagnosis, resulting in a decrease in energy and protein intake. No decrease was observed in the other 48 infants in the cohort. Multivariate analysis showed that the z-score of weight change depended on both ductus arteriosus status and energy intake; thus, infants with hsPDA did not grow as expected with the energy provided to them. CONCLUSION: Energy and protein intake was diminished in prematurely born infants with hsPDA when fluid was restricted after diagnosis. The initial reduction in intakes may have contributed to the lower postnatal growth observed in these infants.

Fluid distribution timetable on adherence to fluid restriction of patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing haemodialysis: Single-blind, Randomized-Controlled Pilot Study.

AIM: To determine the effects of a fluid distribution timetable on adherence to fluid restriction of patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing haemodialysis. BACKGROUND: Fluid restriction is necessary among patients with chronic kidney disease. However, treatment adherence remains a challenge. DESIGN: Single-blind, randomized-controlled pilot study. METHODS: From September - December 2016, 24 consecutively-selected patients with end-stage renal disease from a single dialysis clinic were randomly assigned using computer-generated sequences of randomly permuted blocks stratified according to gender to receive the fluid distribution timetable or standard care. Adherence to fluid restriction was measured using two indicators-thirst and interdialytic weight gain- and were compared using One-way RM-MANOVA and MANCOVA. Secondary outcomes included baseline patient demographic and clinical characteristics and were compared according to treatment allocation. Both groups were followed-up for 4 weeks, assessing outcome measures during the second haemodialysis session for each week. RESULTS: At baseline, the demographic and clinical characteristics and indicators of adherence to fluid restriction were comparable between the two groups. Thirst scores, however, were statistically lower in the treatment group than the control group on the fourth week follow-up. There was also a remarkable decrease from baseline thirst and interdialytic weight gain scores in the treatment group, with partial eta-squared of 0.43 and 0.39, respectively. CONCLUSION: The fluid distribution timetable was an effective adjunct treatment strategy in promoting adherence to fluid restriction. However, since this is just a pilot study, further investigation must be conducted to determine the effects of fluid distribution timetable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03582592.

Use of an Educational Intervention to Improve Fluid Restriction Adherence in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Fluid restriction is a major lifestyle change for patients with end stage renal disease who are on hemodialysis. Educating patients about fluid management supports self-management of their prescribed fluid restrictions. Using a pre-test/post-test design, this project aimed to educate 17 patients on chronic hemodialysis about the management of fluid restrictions for improved renal fluid adherence. Post-intervention assessments revealed increased knowledge of hemodialysis treatment and improved renal fluid adherence. Findings suggest that educational interventions help patients improve knowledge of dietary and fluid management, thereby aiding in adherence to fluid restrictions.

Investigation and management of moderate to severe inpatient hyponatraemia in an Australian tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatraemia is the most common electrolyte disturbance amongst hospitalised patients. Both American and European guidelines recommend fluid restriction as first line treatment for SIADH, however differ on second line recommendations. The objective of this study was to examine investigation and management of hyponatraemia in hospitalised patients in an Australian tertiary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective audit was conducted of electronic medical records and laboratory data of inpatients with serum sodium (Na) ≤125 mmol/L, admitted over a 3 month period to the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. The main outcomes measured included: demographic characteristics, investigations, accuracy of diagnosis, management strategy, change in Na and patient outcomes. RESULTS: The working clinical diagnosis was considered accurate in only 37.5% of cases. Urine Na and osmolality were requested in 72 of 152 patients (47.4%) and in 43 of 70 euvolaemic patients (61.4%). Thyroid function tests (67.1%) and morning cortisol (45.7%) were underutilized in the euvolaemic group. In the SIADH cohort, fluid restriction resulted in a median (IQR) 7.5 mmol/L (4-10.5) increase in Na after 3 days; no treatment resulted in a median 0 mmol/L (- 0.5-1.5) change. Oral urea was utilized in 5 SIADH patients where Na failed to increase with fluid restriction alone. This resulted in a median 10.5 mmol/L (3.5-13) increase in Na from baseline to day 3. There were no cases of osmotic demyelination. The median length of stay was 8 days (4-18.5). Mortality was 11.2% (17 patients). There was a weak but significant correlation between nadir serum Na and mortality (R = 0.18, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Inpatient hyponatraemia is often inadequately investigated, causing errors in diagnosis. Treatment is heterogeneous and often incorrect. In cases with hyponatraemia refractory to fluid restriction, oral urea presents an effective alternative treatment.

Euvolemic hyponatremia in cancer patients. Report of the Hyponatremia Registry: an observational multicenter international study.

PURPOSE: Hyponatremia secondary to SIADH is frequent in cancer patients and potentially deleterious. The aim of this sub-analysis of the Hyponatremia Registry database is to analyze current diagnostic and therapeutic management practices in cancer patients with SIADH. METHODS: We analyzed 358 cancer patients who had serum sodium concentration ([Na+]) ≤ 130 mEq/L and a clinical diagnosis of SIADH from 225 sites in the USA and EU. RESULTS: Precise diagnostic testing was performed in only 46%. Almost 12% of all patients did not receive any hyponatremia treatment. The most frequent therapies were fluid restriction (20%), isotonic saline (14%), fluid restriction/isotonic saline (7%), tolvaptan (8%), and salt tablets (7%). Hypertonic saline was used in less than 3%. Tolvaptan produced the greatest median rate of [Na+] change (IQR) (3.0 (4.7) mEq/L/day), followed by hypertonic saline (2.0(7.0) mEq/L/day), and fluid restriction/isotonic saline (1.9(3.2) mEq/L/day). Both fluid restriction and isotonic saline monotherapies were significantly less effective (0.8(2.0) mEq/L/day and 1.3(3.0) mEq/L/day, respectively) and were associated with clinically relevant rates of treatment failure. Only 46% of patients were discharged with [Na+] ≥ 130 mEq/L. Overly rapid correction of hyponatremia occurred in 11.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Although essential for successful hyponatremia management, appropriate diagnostic testing is not routinely performed in current practice. The most frequently employed monotherapies were often ineffective and sometimes even aggravated hyponatremia. Tolvaptan was used less often but showed significantly greater effectiveness. Despite clear evidence that hyponatremia is associated with poor outcome in oncology patients, most patients were discharged still hyponatremic. Further studies are needed to assess the beneficial impact of hyponatremia correction with effective therapies.

An integrative review of the methodology and findings regarding dietary adherence in end stage kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Dietary modification is an important component of the management of end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The diet for ESKD involves modifying energy and protein intake, and altering sodium, phosphate, potassium and fluid intake. There have been no comprehensive reviews to date on this topic. The aims of this integrative review were to (i) describe the methods used to measure dietary adherence (ii) determine the rate of dietary adherence and (iii) describe factors associated with dietary adherence in ESKD. METHODS: The Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched using the search terms 'adherence' and 'end stage kidney disease'. Of the 787 potentially eligible papers retrieved, 60 papers of 24,743 patients were included in this review. Of these papers, 44 reported the rate of dietary adherence and 44 papers described factors associated with adherence. RESULTS: Most of the evidence regarding dietary adherence is derived from studies of hemodialysis patients (72% of patients). The most common method of measuring dietary adherence in ESKD was subjective techniques (e.g. food diaries or adherence questionnaires). This was followed by indirect methods (e.g. serum potassium, phosphate or interdialytic weight gain). The weighted mean adherence rate to ESKD dietary recommendations was 31.5% and 68.5% for fluid recommendations. Adherence to protein, sodium, phosphate, and potassium recommendations were highly variable due to differences in measurement methods used, and were often derived from a limited evidence base. Socioeconomic status, age, social support and self-efficacy were associated with dietary adherence. However, factors such as taste, the impact of the diet on social eating occasions; and dietetic staffing also appear to play a role in dietary adherence. CONCLUSION: Dietary adherence rates in people with ESKD are suboptimal. Further research is required on dietary adherence in patients with ESKD from different social, educational, economic and ethnic groups. This research may identify other factors which may impact upon adherence, and could be used to inform the design of future strategies to improve dietary adherence. Future research that reports not just the rate of adherence to individual components of the nutrient prescription but also the overall quality of the diet would be useful.

Dietary and fluid restriction perceptions of patients undergoing haemodialysis: an exploratory study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the perspectives of patients undergoing haemodialysis in Singapore on an imposed dietary and fluid restriction regime. BACKGROUND: Adherence to prescribed dietary and fluid restriction constructs the fundamental basis of self-care with improved morbidity and mortality. However, most patients have struggled to adhere in this aspect. Existing studies have presented limited understanding on the facilitators and barriers of dietary and fluid adherence among haemodialysis patients. DESIGN: An exploratory qualitative study. METHODS: A purposive sample of 14 patients undergoing haemodialysis was recruited from a renal unit of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Data were collected through face-to-face individual interviews and subsequently analysed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) Pessimism, (2) Existing struggles, (3) Perceived quality of support, and (4) Immensity of self-discipline. CONCLUSIONS: The imposed dietary and fluid restriction is a constant struggle and a cause of suffering among haemodialysis patients in Singapore. Nonetheless, they are generally submissive to their fluid restrictions for the sake of survival or to meet the expectations of their loved ones. The imposed dietary restrictions are generally neglected. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings from this study can provide useful information in reviewing existing educational strategies, policies and nursing care. This is especially important because most patients exhibit high reliance on healthcare professionals.

Cultural factors influencing dietary and fluid restriction behaviour: perceptions of older Chinese patients with heart failure.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the cultural factors related to dietary and fluid restriction behaviours among older Chinese patients. BACKGROUND: Excess dietary sodium and fluid intake are risk factors contributing to the worsening and rehospitalisation for heart failure in older patients. Managing the complex fluid and diet requirements of heart failure patients is challenging and is made more complicated by cultural variations in self-management behaviours in response to a health threat. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured in interviews and framework analysis. METHODS: The design of this study is qualitative descriptive. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 heart failure patients. Data were analysed through content analysis. RESULTS: Seven cultural themes emerged from the qualitative data: the values placed on health and illness, customary way of life, preference for folk care and the Chinese healthcare system, and factors related to kinship and social ties, religion, economics and education. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary change and management in response to illness, including heart failure, is closely related to individuals' cultural background. Healthcare providers should have a good understanding of cultural aspects that can influence patients' conformity to medical recommendations. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Heart failure patients need support that considers their cultural needs. Healthcare providers must have a good understanding of the experiences of people from diverse cultural backgrounds.